BEFOR THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT PESHAWER

Revive petition_______

Muhammad Zubair S/O Mir Aman R/O Muhallah Khumari khail Cl Sher kaly
Tehsil Razzar District Swabi

……………………Petitioner 
 
                                      Versus
 
1.  Medical Director, Burn and trauma center Hayatabad Medical
complex, Phase-IV, Hayatabad Peshawer.
2. Selection committee, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Through Medical
director.
3. Palwasha Reema Personal assistant Burn and trauma center,
Hayatabad medical complex, Phase-IV, Hayatabad Peshawar.
……………………Respondents
 
 
Revision Petition under section 476 / A cr. p.c for  set aside the
order Dt . 27 – 03 – 09 and grant the superdari of vehicle car No
LEA – 1467  Toyota Corrolla to the petitioner being the legal owner
of the above said car under the relevant provision of law
 
May it please your honour ,
 
1.    That the petitioner is a law abiding citizen of Pakistan and has
very good antecendent in his credit and never involve in any
criminal case.
2.    That the petitioner purchased a car No LEA . 1467 from the
respondent No 1 with the consideration of  Rs 360 , 000 / - and
paid the total amount at the spot in the presence of the witnesses
transfer deed . Authority Letter . Bahmee Muaheeda . are annexed
with this petition .  As annexture A . B. C.
3.    That the above said car was bank leasing and the petitioner
issued cheques to the name of the bank and handed over
that cheques to the respondent No. 1 and took possession of the
car on the same day i.e. 1 – 2 – 08 .
4.    That the petitioner deposited the bank installments of the above
said car regularly , copies of installment recipts As
annex. D . are annexed with the plaint.
5.    That the above said car was in the used of the petitioner , but
unfortunately a road accident took place on 24 – 8 –
08 . at sargodha and car was detained  in the police station satellite
town sargodha .
6.    That the car was on the name of the respondent No . 1 so the
petitioner approach the respondent No 1  and requested him to
allow the superdari to the petitioner , which request was accepted
by the respondent .
7.    That the respondent No 1alongwith the petitioner approached the
honourable court of sargodha for the superdari of the above said
car ,  but the respondent No 1 detectfully and after traping the
petitioner took the car from the police station on superdari without
any lawful excuse  .
8.    That when the petitioner came to know about the high handed
ness of the respondent No 1. he tried his level best to trace the
respondent No 1. but the respondent No 1. did not join or contact
or to receive the call of the petitioner .
9.    That the respondent No 1 again sold out the above said car or
play drama to another person namely Rana Shahid Mehmood son
of Abar Ali Khan , while the respondent No 1 was legally not
empower to do such kind of unlawful act .
 10.                    That an occurance took place between the respondent No 1
and the Rana Shahid Mehmood , so the police took the possession
of the car under section 550 cr. p. c.
11.                    That when the petitioner came to know about the high
handed ness of the respondent No 1 he filed an application
for superdari of the above said car . and the respondent No 1 also
filed an application of superdari  before the respondent No 2.
12.                    That the respondent No 2 after hearing both the parites ,
ordered to approach the honourable civil court for the appropriate
order , which is against the law and facts. 
 
Under the circumstances it is most respectfully prayer that respondent
no 2 be directed  that pass an order and direct the respondent no 1to
deliver the said vehicle to the petitioner as he is the real honour of the
car
 
 
                                                                               Petitioner
Through : -
 
                                            Muhammad Abid Mughal,
                                            Advocate High Court,