- in the course of his employment the provincial fiscal. O
as such, - or by any other person in a - ALTERNATIVE REMEDY: his remedy being a separate civil action after proper reservation is made therefor. fiduciary capacity, or for a willful (People vs. Lipana, 72 Phil. 166, 170) violation of duty; - (c) When the accused has concealed, - EXCEPTION: But the offended party may rightly removed, or disposed of his personal intervene by interposing an appeal from the order property, or is about to do so; dismissing the action upon a question of law. - (d) When the accused resides outside the (People vs. Maceda, 73 Phil. 679, 681) Philippines. (Sec. 2, Rule 127, Revised Rules RULE: When the court found the accused guilty of criminal of Criminal Procedure) negligence, but failed to enter judgment of civil liability, the RULE: Writ of attachment, etc. may be issued in criminal cases. private prosecutor has a right to appeal for purposes of the - Within the criminal action, with which the civil action civil liability of the accused. is impliedly instituted, the offended party may obtain the preliminary writ of attachment. The appellate court may remand the case to the trial court for - The court (in which the civil action is pending) is, the latter to include in its judgment, the civil liability of the accused. (People vs. Ursua, 60 Phil. 252, 254-255) after the filing of the information in the criminal case, - not ipso facto deprived of the power to issue RULE: When a judgment convicting the accused is appealed, preliminary and auxiliary writs, such as - the offended party has the right to be heard during - preliminary injunction, the appeal. (People vs. Villegas, G.R. No. 45039, - attachment, C.A., IV L.J. 635) - appointment of receiver, - fixing amounts of bonds, RULE: If the Solicitor General asks for the reversal of the appealed judgment and the acquittal of the accused, - and other processes of similar nature, - the offended party has also the right to be heard. - which do not go into the merits of the case. (People vs. Villegas, G.R. No. 45039, C.A., IV L.J. 635) (Ramcar, Inc. vs. De Leon, 78 Phil. 449, 452-453; Babala vs. Abano, 90 Phil. 827, 828-829) RULE: Before the expiration of the 15-day period for appealing, RULE: The provisional remedies in civil actions insofar as they - the trial court can amend the judgment of are applicable may be availed of in connection with civil conviction by adding a provision for the civil liability of the accused, action deemed instituted with the criminal action. (Sec. 1, - and this notwithstanding/INSPITEOF that the Rule 127, Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure) judgment became final because the accused had commenced the service of his sentence. (People vs. RULE: From the judgment of conviction in criminal case, two Rodriguez, 97 Phil. 349, 351) appeals may be taken. - This ruling applies even though an appeal from the - Every criminal case involves two actions: judgment of conviction has already been - one criminal and perfected. (People vs. Co Ko Tong, C.A., 51 O.G. 6337) - civil. - From a judgment of conviction, two appeals may, RULE: Reservation of the right to institute separate civil action accordingly, be taken. is necessary in the following cases: - The accused may seek a review of said judgment as regards both actions. 1. In any of the cases referred to in Art. 32, Civil Code. - RULE: Similarly, the complainant may appeal with 2. In cases of defamation, fraud, and physical injuries. respect only to the civil action. - The words "defamation," "fraud" and "physical - The right of either to appeal or not to appeal is not injuries" are used in their ordinary sense. The term dependent upon the other. (People vs. Coloma, "physical injuries" means bodily injury, not the crime [Unrep.] 105 Phil. 1287) of physical injuries. It includes attempted homicide, frustrated homicide, or even death. (Carandang vs. RULE: If the criminal action is dismissed by the court on motion Hon. Vicente Santiago, 97 Phil. 94,96-97) Estafa is of the fiscal upon the ground of insufficiency of evidence, the included in the term "fraud." Where fraud is the basis offended party has no right to appeal, for both the civil and the criminal actions, they are, according to law, to proceed independently. In the - The reason for the rule is that the continuation of the same way that the civil suit can be tried, the criminal offended party's intervention in a criminal action prosecution has to run its course. (Rojas vs. People, depends upon the continuation of such action by No. L-22237, May 31, 1974, 57 SCRA 243, 249)