Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
com)
FEB UGM 06/ 193754/ EK/ 16243
I. COMPANY PROFILE
Nucor chose to enhance the scope of the company for corporate performance
reasons. In order to gain higher degree of control, Nucor established a functional
diversification which concerns an expansion of backwards range activities towards
supplier (vertical integration) and acts directly as distributor. The breadth of scope
along functional dimension was followed by narrow scope along geographic
dimension which can be seen from its geographic concentration solely in United
States. Since Nucor’s business-units have the same basic resource; steel, it has
high level of relatedness.
Strategic Management
Nidya Judhi Astrini <nidyajudhi_astrini@yahoo.com)
FEB UGM 06/ 193754/ EK/ 16243
portion of its output in the form of end products internally. As a vertical integrated
firm, Nucor’s business units take this role largely.
In every country, tax policies are unavoidable. Nucor deals with taxes in United
States such as states, federal, and local taxes. Even though taxes heavily affect
their bottom line, they do not always negatively affect a business, especially when
those taxes are meant to protect local company. In international perspective, Nucor
also deals with international trade law. Markets are attractive when currency is
weak. This was the case for the steel industry during the economic downturn in
2001. Imports soared to record highs, while exports were very low.
Nucor targets small rural towns in order to have a very loyal community base. It
avoids building in major cities to maintain relationships more directly with its
community. Nucor faces problems with the increasing age of baby-boomers
because it led to a nationwide decrease in blue-collar workers. Technology has
major impact to steel industry. While some steel industries outsource their
production due to high pace of technology, Nucor took the opposite approach.
Nucor was the first to pioneer mini-mill technology of small factory production of a
specific product and eventually increase its capacity utilization.
Nucor’s primary inbound logistics are scrap metal and electricity. Nucor has
established a raw materials strategy to control directly and indirectly through joint
ventures with various partners. Their first material control occurred in 1968 when
they decided to move to steel business to provide raw material for Vulcraft. In
August 2005, Vulcraft Structural Products, Vulcraft Decking, Nucor Building Systems
Products, NUCON Light Gauge Framing, and Nucor Fastener Products were being
supplied by groups of Nucor Bar, Beam, Plate, and Sheet Mills. The groups of Mills
used scrap steels until 99% from both post-consumer (17%) and post-industrial
recycled content (83%). Post-industrial scrap steel acquired through joint-ventures.
Nucor’s battle with energy prices was solved by using mini-mill technology.
Strategic Management
Nidya Judhi Astrini <nidyajudhi_astrini@yahoo.com)
FEB UGM 06/ 193754/ EK/ 16243
Since Nucor has broke traditional way of equalizing freight, domestic markets
relocate around Nucor’s plants in order to receive substantial cost reductions and
use JIT. From international approach, Nucor does not give many services.
Since the divisions did their own manufacturing, selling, accounting, engineering,
and personal management, corporate staff only consisted of less than forty-five
people. The offices were simple, routine, and business-like. To be successful with
integration, corporate managers required new functional skills to expand their
knowledge structures to address new complementary perspectives since there are
unique functional capabilities specific to each stage in the industry chain. Nucor
has worked through a difficult time in the industry to become the world’s 10th-
largest steelmaker and the biggest steelmaker in the US. Their key success is their
excellency in managing knowledge and people. Nucor philosophy of self-
empowerment has encouraged them to hire people that want to make decisions on
their own, responsible for what they do, and have an attitude of pride and
excitement in their accomplishment.
Strategic Management
Nidya Judhi Astrini <nidyajudhi_astrini@yahoo.com)
FEB UGM 06/ 193754/ EK/ 16243
In a market that has low product differentiation, in which customers demand the
lowest possible price, fierce rivalry ensues because of the price competition. Nucor
was the dominant player in the US economy, but fierce price competition from
abroad increased competition among firms. The biggest threat is added production
of cheap foreign steel. New entry into the US market is not likely because of the
enormous capital expenditures required and because of the unfavorable labor
conditions. Price increases in scrap steel which was caused by increased demand
domestically and abroad have added pressure on Nucor in keeping their supply
costs low. Because the majority of Nucor’s sales are on a bid framework, buyers
have tremendous bargaining power. Unlike the other sections of the model so far,
the threat of substitutes is relatively low. Essentially, no other metal can offer equal
benefits per cost that steel currently can. Aluminum is probably the biggest
substitute product to steel for most applications but it is not as strong as steel.
The year 2005 is a good year for Nucor. Their net income rose significantly but
their liabilities continue to grow in a stable rate. Nucor revenue was above average
even though still under the United States Steel Corp. Nucor has the biggest number
of ROE and market capitalization among its rivals. After February 2005, Nucor’s
stock price jumped dramatically.
Nucor’s key strengths are its corporate philosophy, cost control, and innovative
leadership. One of Nucor’s key strategic strengths is its philosophy of empowering
its workers and reducing the inefficient bureaucracy that plagues corporate
America. Another one of Nucor’s key strengths is its focus on cost control. To be
competitive in a market with little product differentiation, price is the main
competitive factor. One of Nucor’s core competencies is that its expertise in
keeping costs low.
Dependency on scrap steel and energy prices and the inherent volatility in these
markets pose to be the biggest weaknesses of Nucor. Huge capital requirements
for expansion and technological modernization are another weakness of Nucor.
As the US, steel economy continues to be beat down by cheap foreign steel, many
companies that have continued to thrive, namely Nucor, have tremendous
opportunities to capitalize on. As many US steel manufacturing companies fall into
bankruptcy, Nucor can acquire them, increase production capacity, and increase
Strategic Management
Nidya Judhi Astrini <nidyajudhi_astrini@yahoo.com)
FEB UGM 06/ 193754/ EK/ 16243
The biggest threat the firm will encounter going forward is unequivocally the
erosion of their market share and profitability resulting from growing imports of
cheaper foreign steel. Another threat that looms in the steel industry is the heavy
correlation between economic growth and the demand for steel.
V. STRATEGY FORMULATION
Nucor faces a problem with excess capacity of steel production on a global scale.
The high capacity has created a price war for steel, as well as steel dumping into
the U.S. market which has diminished profit over the last couple of decades.
Another problem they face is lack of innovation of technology. In order for Nucor to
maintain, and continue to post profits, in the future they must identify areas to
increase technology to lower production costs and increase throughput.
a. Strategy Alternatives
1. Stay domestic and maintain its technological advances and cost reductions
2. Works internationally
Based on several factors, our team suggests that Nucor works globally rather than
stay domestic and maintain its technological advances and cost reductions.
The decreasing number of baby-boomers workforce also hurts Nucor. Jobs in steel
plants are considered uninteresting for the young generation and labor wages in US
are high compared with China and Korea. Exporting steels from US to another
country might result on high cost and risky distribution since Nucor does not have
any plants outside US.
Strategic Management
Nidya Judhi Astrini <nidyajudhi_astrini@yahoo.com)
FEB UGM 06/ 193754/ EK/ 16243
The risk which arises because of US market cyclical characteristics can be overcome
by spreading the risk into larger market base and the excessive capacity can be
allocated to several different countries. The price war in a global market is not as
stiff as in local market. Nucor has the choice to outsource the research and
development of the technology to its partner.
Nucor’s marketing pitch such as environmentally friendly, workers safety, and its
unique incentive pay might attract both consumers and workforces outside US.
Each plants in several different country will enable Nucor to serve consumers in a
better way.
Nucor needs to find cheaper global suppliers and make joint-ventures with them to
ensure the availability of raw materials which will be included in supplier’s balance
sheet rather than Nucor’s balance sheet. It will help Nucor to maintain low
inventory.
Nucor must pay attention to the latest technology which will be useful in steel
industry and be prepared to take the risk by implementing that technology. Make
the entire value chain from raw material control until distribution process as the
center of gravity.
VII.CONCLUSION
Overall, the steel industry is a very tough industry to compete in and be successful.
It is vital that Nucor is in a position to acquire other companies and form joint
ventures. Nucor currently has done a remarkable job moving itself to an industry
leader. Their proven organizational style, management, employees, and active
pursuit of growth have allowed them to emerge as a global industry leader.
However, that is not to say there will not be more major challenges for Nucor.
Nucor is currently faced with increasing competition from both domestic and
international rivalries. It is critical that Nucor continues to grow and increase global
Strategic Management
Nidya Judhi Astrini <nidyajudhi_astrini@yahoo.com)
FEB UGM 06/ 193754/ EK/ 16243
REFERENCES
ACCS. 2005. Dimensions of Corporate Strategy: Framing The Real Issues. Vallendar,
Germany.
Peyrefitte, J., Golden, P., and Brice Jr, J. 2002. Vertical Integration and Economic
Performance: A Managerial Capability Framework.
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/0025-1747.htm
http://www.nucor.com/indexinner.aspx?finpage=aboutus
Strategic Management