One order of Judaism, hold the religion By Tamar Morad tags: Hebrew, Jewish

community  Might publicly funded 'charter' schools that teach Hebrew and Jewish culture,
but steer clear of God, be an answer to assimilation? One billionaire hopes so.
When the Ben Gamla Charter School opened its doors this fall to 400 students in South
Florida, it burst open the gates of controversy among American Jewry about how the Jewish
community should be educating its children − and what a potential proliferation of language-
based charter schools means for the America they live in.

Charter schools are privately run but funded by tax money. Dual-language English-Hebrew
charter schools - Ben Gamla, in Hollywood, some 20 miles north of Miami, is the only one in
existence to date - would offer Hebrew as well as Jewish culture, history and literature
(including Bible) to students in kindergarten through 8th grade, without teaching ritual and
religious studies.

Doing the latter would put the school on the wrong side of the constitution's church-state
divide. Proponents of such schools say they could offer an alternative to the high and rapidly
rising tuitions of most Jewish day schools. Others herald it as a solution for many non-
Orthodox Jewish families averse to sending their children to religious schools.
 When there was resistance in Broward County, where Ben Gamla is located, the
school board took the unusual step of hiring an academic consultant to monitor the school, so
as to ensure it didn't breach the church-state divide.

Across the country, opposition has rapidly emerged, in many cases expressing itself via
dozens of blogs - Ben Gamla founder Peter Deutsch estimates there are more than 50. And
leaders in Jewish education and influential onlookers are watching the fray carefully and
debating quietly among themselves. Meanwhile, Deutsch says he has received dozens of calls
from community leaders nationwide expressing interest in setting up similar schools, from
such disparate locations as northern New Jersey, Atlanta, Detroit and Orange County,
California.

That's certainly what Jewish philanthropist Michael Steinhardt is hoping for. The "birthright
Israel" program he helped co-found, which offers a free trip to Israel to every interested young
Jew, is also an attempt to engage young Jews with few ties to Judaism and Israel. Through the
nonprofit organization he is launching, Areivim Philanthropic Group, Steinhardt, who made
his billions as a hedge-fund pioneer and in other Wall Street activities, is Advertisement
drawing up plans for a series of Hebrew charter schools.

In 2003, he announced that he is putting forth $10 million of his own money and challenged
other Jewish philanthropists to provide another $90 million for Jewish educational initiatives,
including charter schools. Today the fund is nearly at its $100 million goal; other donors
include Eugene Appelbaum, Bill Davidson and Harold Grinspoon.

A new statistic is fueling Steinhardt's push for charter schools. After pouring more than $125
million into Jewish educational projects in the last 12 years, Steinhardt was startled earlier this
year when the research group he funds at Brandeis University, the Steinhardt Social Research
Institute, found that only 3 percent of non-Orthodox Jews in the U.S. attend Jewish day
schools.

"I can't pour enough scorn on the professional Jewish world for the fact that it has stood by
and watched the Jewish population assimilate and not come up with any serious way to stop
it," he says.
Jonathan Sarna calls that statement "ridiculous." The Brandeis University professor of
American Jewish history notes that "compared to where we were 40 or 50 years ago in Jewish
education, it's night and day. Then, it was unfathomable that there would be Jewish day
schools in every major Jewish community in the country, and in many cities there are multiple
choices. From a historian's perspective, this has happened in the blink of an eye."

But assimilation too has come fast and powerful, says Steinhardt. "The Orthodox believe in
Jewish literacy, and most of the rest of us couldn't care less... Rabbis and other creatures have
a monopoly on Judaism. This is a turnoff in a world that is increasingly secular and that has
turned away from religion. Jews are simply turning away from Judaism."

The charter school model he is imagining is one in which Hebrew and Jewish culture would
be taught on-site and religious instruction would be optional and off-site, though he is
considering other permutations too. Hebrew charter schools, he says, "are the only serious
possibility we have of there ever being a substantial proportion of the Jewish population that
knows how to speak Hebrew and be literate enough about Judaism."

Law vs. policy

In the background of the debate is a wide-sweeping national discussion about whether charter
schools in general are the appropriate response to a failing public school system. Voices on
both sides of the Hebrew charter school debate are closely watching developments with other
charters, including a current episode in which several Catholic schools in Washington D.C.
with declining enrollment are weighing becoming charter schools, and another in which a
Harlem church sued the State of New York after it turned down the church's request to start a
charter school.

Making the matter even more complex is the fact that each state has its own charter
regulations, which make establishing schools and receiving funds for them easier or harder -
so the establishment of one school in Florida hardly provides a guide for what is to be
expected in other states.

Opponents say the schools won't work - or shouldn't work - because they'll breach the church-
state divide. Leon Botstein, president of Bard College, is one of them. He worked with
Steinhardt in developing the curriculum for what was to be a private, secular Jewish school in
Manhattan.

Botstein believes there is a "huge need" for secular Jewish education. But, he says, "I'm a firm
believer in the separation of church and state, and I think charter schools will inevitably cross
that line, so I'm opposed to them."

But Botstein's private-school idea, which he and Steinhardt had hoped would become the
"Jewish Dalton," the top-notch Manhattan prep school, and for which Steinhardt invested
more than $1 million trying to get it started, fell apart after getting mired in debate about its
mission.

It was a complex one: Steinhardt and Botstein intended to teach Hebrew, Jewish culture and
Bible, and anticipated admitting non-Jews as well as Jews. The concept, says Botstein, was to
"mainstream the Jewish intellectual tradition − to make Judaism relevant in secular life and
relevant to non-Jews."

Yet Sarna says Jews who say those are opposed to charter schools on legal grounds, the
church-state line, aren't focused on the right issue.

"When they cry out 'unconstitutional,' and then the conservative U.S. Supreme Court we have
now doesn't strike down these kinds of schools, many people in the Jewish community run the
risk of getting egg on their faces," he says. "This is a public-policy issue, not a legal one."

Good for the Jews?

Even if Hebrew charter schools did pass muster with church-state watchdogs and emerge
victorious in a public policy debate, there is little agreement about what contribution they
would make to educating Jewish kids about Judaism. Yossi Prager is on the fence on this
subject.

Nevertheless, Prager, the executive director for North America of the Avi Chai Foundation,
which funds day schools and other Jewish educational initiatives, is a key voice in this debate.
"Hebraic charter schools could help to educate a wider swath of Jewish children who would
otherwise go to regular public schools, by giving them at least Hebrew language and some
exposure to Jewish culture," says Prager. "The concern is that these schools could potentially
draw students away from day schools." (At Ben Gamla, 80 percent of students came from
public schools, 20 percent from day schools.)

Since a charter school could not legally replicate a serious day school education - and would
be a "very poor alternative," Prager says - the question becomes, "Can charter schools be
formulated or situated so that they attract large numbers of non-day school families without
drawing many students from day schools." Right now, he concludes, more market research
must be done to determine demand.

In South Florida at least, with a Jewish population of some 700,000, there is "tremendous"
demand, says Peter Deutsch, a former U.S. congressman from the region, and Ben Gamla's
founder. He says he could fill as many as 10,000 desks at Ben Gamla-like schools in the
region, and he has applied for four more charters.

The area's burgeoning Israeli population is part of the source of that demand: 37 percent of
Ben Gamla's students cites Hebrew as their first language. Some families are day-school
refugees who decamped because of high tuitions. Others with disabled children say area day
schools weren't able to provide them with the educational support they needed. ?(Public
schools are required to provide such support?).

Charter schools "make the public schools better because they force competition, and a school
like Ben Gamla will give some kind of education about Judaism to Jewish kids who would
otherwise get no Jewish education," says Deutsch. "It's a win-win."

A trend would be "transformative," he says. "Just look the numbers: The major Jewish
foundations combined might spend a few hundred million in a decade nationwide. We could
get $250 million from the government over 10 years - and that's just for four schools in South
Florida."

Perhaps the most common objection to such schools is the claim that it's impossible to
separate Jewish religion from Jewish culture, and that the attempt to parse them apart is just a
waste of time and resources and invites unwanted scrutiny.

Marvin Schick, an expert on constitutional law and a senior consultant to Avi Chai, noted in a
recent article for the New York Jewish Week that Ben Gamla "is being scrutinized by an army
of watchdogs, including the ever-alert guardians of the Constitution, public education officials
and Jewish church-state vigilantes."

Jewish charters, he was told, "will require an enormous amount of monitoring." Schick thinks
the community is better off figuring out a way to improve stagnant enrollment in day schools.

The bigger picture is even more unnerving, says Sarna, who believes that a proliferation of
Hebrew charter schools will be bad for America. "I'm more sympathetic to charter schools
with a focus on music or other specialties. Cultural-immersion schools beg for trouble
because the purpose of public education is to create a society in which people of all stripes
come together. It hasn't totally succeeded but it still can. What worries me is that we could
have Arabic schools for Muslims, Hebrew schools for Jews, Armenian schools for
Armenians, and then we'll end up with a balkanized America. And that's not good for any of
us."

While people are lining up on both sides of the issue, both in South Florida specifically, and
among Jewish educators generally in the rest of the country, many influential voices, such as
those of Sarna and Prager, still have mixed feelings about the benefits of Hebrew charter
schools.

"I have grave doubts that the religion-less Judaism that Ben Gamla School can teach will be a
long-lasting solution for Jews," says Sarna. "Culture is not a strong bond, like religion. But I
can see the argument that perhaps better a Jewish culture school than no Jewish education at
all. Therefore, I would not publicly criticize an effort for Hebrew charter schools. But I don't
want to see Jews as the pioneers of a policy that is not ideal for us and not so good for
society."