Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
While abundant marketing literature certain ends. A recent study found that
focuses on customer satisfaction motivation was stressing at the point
and service quality online, only of to having an experience like fun or
few researches has analysed the socializing with others that ultimately
relative importance of various helps in discovering why people goes
shopping experience components. for online shopping.
This study would provide several
contributions to the e-marketing and As customer experience is
retailing literature that both brings associated with pleasure, arousal,
new knowledge and extends existing and achieving a specific end while
knowledge, by developing a clear shopping, it is more often compared
understanding of what contributes with the terms “hedonic” and
online shopping experience. Based “utilitarian” in several studies.
on the existing literature, individual According to Handa and Gupta (2014),
factors influencing online shopping hedonic classifications are related to
experience and their impact on intrinsically motivated intentions,
intention to repurchase has been while utilitarian classifications are
ascertained. In particular, five main related to extrinsic motivational
types of consumer factors such as aspects. As such, pleasurable
motivation, convenience, service motivations bring individuals to
quality, website and accessibility has the interface by influencing their
been identified. This paper provides experiences and keep them involved
a better understanding based on the in the interaction emotionally.
mixed findings across different studies.
P1. Therefore it is proposed that
Motivation motivation influences the online
shopping experience.
Several studies have examined
the facet of motivation with respect to
Convenience
online shopping environments (Novak
et al., 2000). For instance, motivation Numerous shopping studies have
is a most constructive aspect that identified convenience as a discrete
supports the investigation of customer drive for online store choice (Jiang,
engagement (Mehta, sharma and Yang and Jun, 2013; Liu & Forsythe,
swamy, 2013). In particular, Hill, 2010). Convenience shoppers are often
Beatty and Walsh (2013) have found characterized as selecting things based
that shopping motivations consist of on time or effort savings. Consumers
three various dimensions such as wish acquire greater experience in online
to obtain a product, desire to satisfy shopping because it reduces the
needs, and goal of accomplishing burden of visiting the store in person
2017 Swapana, Padmavathy 21
Accessibility
In online shopping context, Figure1. Conceptual Framework
accessibility plays a vital role since
consumers prefer the medium that
RESEARCH IMPLICATION AND
demonstrates an accessible user
FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS
interface (Overmars & Poels, 2015).
In recent years, people often consider The proposed conceptual model
buying things from online if they feel in this paper suggest a number of
hard in fighting crowds or finding that research avenues. As this study
their product is no longer available associates online shopping with
in retail stores because of the ease of experiential aspects, there are
accessibility in online shopping (Khare numerous opportunities for theoretical
and Rakesh, 2015). Here, consumers and empirical research in this area.
have more advantageous benefits in The links proposed in the model offers
terms of searching through filtering several ways for a detailed assessment
product category, price, color,size, etc. of specific relationships and their
outcomes.
While shopping in online,
consumers expects and prefers the site The first step towards theory
that has no accessibility violations. building involves furnishing customer
As many online retailers provide engagement. There is a need to keep
accessible technologies like voice the customers involved emotionally by
recognition software, screen reader, acknowledging fun and pleasure. While
2017 Swapana, Padmavathy 23
Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung, Rose, S., Hair, N., & Clark, M. (2011).
Y. F. (2000). Measuring the Online customer experience:
Customer Experience in Online A review of the business-to-
environments: A Structural consumer online purchase
modeling approach. Marketing context. International Journal
Science 19(1), 22–42. of Management Reviews, 13(1),
24-39.
Overmars, S., & Poels, K. (2015).
Online product experiences: Thamizhvanan, A., & Xavier, M. J.
The effect of simulating stroking (2013). Determinants of customers’
gestures on product understanding online purchase intention: an
and the critical role of user empirical study in India. Journal
of Indian Business Research,
control. Computers in Human
5(1), 17-32.
Behavior, 51, 272-284.
Tong, X. (2010). A cross-national
Pahnila, S., & Warsta, J. (2010). Online
investigation of an extended
shopping viewed from a habit
technology acceptance model
and value perspective. Behaviour
in the online shopping
& Information Technology,
context. International Journal
29(6), 621-632.
of Retail & Distribution
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Management, 38(10), 742-759.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1991). Refinement Tsao, W. C., & Tseng, Y. L. (2011). The
and reassessment of the SERVQUAL impact of electronic-service quality
scale. Journal of retailing, 67(4), on online shopping behaviour. Total
420. Quality Management & Business
Excellence, 22(9), 1007-1024.
26 Sona Global Management Review January - June