Project Name Wilmont’s Pharmacy Drone Case

Revision Number 1.0

Date 18-Sep-19

Current Costs Current Cost of quality

Research & Design $50,000
Machine costs $200,000
Training $75,000
Total $325,000

Furture cost of failures Future Cost of quality

Research & Design Rework $60,000
New Machine costs $300,000
Training $85,000
Track Testing $50,000
Testing $5,000
Total $500,000

Quality Saves: ($175,000)

Project Name Wilmont’s Pharmacy Drone Case
Revision Number 1.0
Date 21-Sep-20

Current Costs Current Cost of quality Future Cost of quality

Research & Design $50,000
Machine costs $200,000
Training $75,000
Total $325,000

Furture cost of failures

Research & Design Rework $60,000
New Machine costs $300,000
Training $85,000
Track Testing $50,000
Testing $5,000
Total $500,000

Quality Saves: ($175,000)

 ProjectWilmont’s
Name Pharmacy Drone Case
Revision
1.0Number
Date ######

Likelihood Rating Scale

Likelihood Rating
Description
Scale
5 Nearly>80%
Certain
Probability of occurring
4 Likely50-80% chance of occurring
3 Possible
21-49% chance of occurring
2 Unlikely
1-20% chance of occurring
1 Rare <1% chance of occurring

Impact Rating Scale

Description
Impac
t
Ratin Cost Schedule Scope Quality
g
Scale
Meeting
5 > >4
requirements Project may not be completed in
Very 250,00 weeks
agreed with time
High 0 delay
Wilmont
Meeting
< >2
4 requirements Project may not meet all
200,00 weeks
High agreed with requirements
0 delay
Wilmont
Meeting
3 <
> 1 week requirements
Mod 150,00 Performance is reduced
delay agreed with
erate 0
Wilmont
Meeting
<
2 < 1 week requirements
100,00 Some compensation is required
Low delay agreed with
0
Wilmont
Meeting
1
< 1 day requirements
Very May require correction
50,000 delay agreed with
Low
Wilmont

Dates
Risk Responsible
Priority WBS Risk Description Open
ID Person
The service contract and payment
1 1 1.1.3 Katie plan is not finalised within the 1-Sep-19
required time frame

Budget is set at 1.75 million and the

1.2.1,
2 2 Neha cost estimates may run over since 1-Sep-19
1.1.3
the requirements are unclear

Project is not completed in time by

3 1 1.2.1 Neha 1-Sep-19
November 30
System must communicate with
4 3 1.3.1 Eileen other infrastructure system across 1-Sep-19
internet
New package release systems tests
5 3 1.3.4 William find flaw in design and are not 1-Sep-19
completed in time

6 1 1.2.1 Ashish Delay in drones/materials arriving 1-Sep-19

Participating pharmacies are unable

7 3 1.5.1 Gerald 1-Sep-19
to use the drones properly

Role Name
DroneTech
Proje
Jordan
ct
Kemple
Spon
r
sor
Proje
ct
Neha
Mana
ger
Flight

Oper
Gerald
ation
Hasper
s
Mana
ger
Dron
e
Syste William
ms Holt
Engin
eer
Corp
orate
Katie
O’Ryan
Attor
ney
Dron
e
Syste
Ashish
ms
Nehra
Tech
nicia
n
Eileen
IT
Seymo
POC
ur
 Risk Assessment Matrix
Consequence

Insignifican
Likelihood Critical Major Moderate Minor t

Almost
Certain Extreme Extreme High Medium Medium

Likely Extreme High High Medium Medium

Possible High High Medium Medium Low

Unlikely High Medium Medium Low Low

Rare High Medium Low Low Low

Project Risk Register

Dates Analysis Impact
 Impact Likelihood Prior to After
Closed Severity
Rating Rating Mitigation Mitigation

> 4 week < 1 week

5 3 15
delay delay

5 2 10

> 4 week < 1 week

5 3 15
delay delay

4 1 4

3 2 6

5 2 10

3 1 3
 Mitigation Strategy Contingency Status

Get more details from Wilmont so that

the service contract can be completed 150000
in time
Communicate the cost estimates
based on current requirements to both
Jordan Kempler and the client. Use low
budgeting technique without taking
from quality or performance
Add schedule contingency in plan to
allow design to be complete. Add 150000
additional staff
Ensure security policies and
procedures are being used to protect
data
Add schedule contingency in plan to
allow design to be complete. Add
additional staff
Use expedited shipping. Confirm
availability with suppliers during design
Set up training sessions for the staff at
participating pharmacies so that they
can learn to use the new technology
properly