Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Chapter 1
Introduction: This chapter will provide you the necessary knowledge in MTB-MLE—
especially its background and how it was implemented in the K-12 curriculum.
Moreover, this chapter of your module will equip you with additional learning on our
national languages and how these languages used in instruction.
Learning Outcomes
c. Discuss cultural rootedness as one of the reasons behind the use of mother
tongue
Learning Content
BASIC TERMINOLOGIES
Multilingual Education).
There are local and international researches that suggest that children learn to
read, write, and speak faster when they use their L1 (First language) and eventually
grasp a second and or third language easily if taught in L1. It is the same in
acquiring competencies specifically in Science and Math. Because of these, the
Department of Education (DepEd) recognized the advantages of teaching children
utilizing their first language.
DepEd instituted MTB-MLE through Department Order 94, having the following
major languages as medium of instruction in 2012-2013: Tagalog; Kapampangan;
Pangasinense; Iloko; Bikolano ; Cebuano; Hiligaynon; Waray; Tausug;
Maguinadanaoan; Maranao; Chabacano, Ivatan; Sambal; Akianon; Kinaray-a, Yakan,
and Sinurigaonon.
In region 2 Ilokano still is the dominant native language being spoken by the
majority followed by Ibanag which is known to be the Lingua Franca of Cagayan
Valley. Originally, Ibanag is excluded from the original languages as a medium of
instruction for MTB-MLE. However, because of the initiative of the former Vice
President Binay, Ibanag was included. The pilot implementation of the Mother
Tongue-Based Multi-Lingual Education (MTB-MLE) program of the Department of
Education (DepEd) using Ibanag as the medium of instruction started in around 34
public schools in Cagayan and Isabela. The said program rolled out in 15
municipalities and two cities—San Pablo, Cabagan, Tumauini, Santo Tomas, Santa
Maria, Gamu, Naguilian, Reina Mercedes and the City of Ilagan in Isabela, and
Pamplona, Abulug, Aparri, Camalaniugan, Lallo, Iguig, Solana and Tuguegarao City
in Cagayan.
ACTIVITY 1
Learning outcomes:
The Stages
Through his observations of his children, Piaget developed a stage theory of
intellectual development that included four distinct stages:
The infant knows the world through their movements and sensations
Children learn about the world through basic actions such as sucking,
grasping, looking, and listening
Infants learn that things continue to exist even though they cannot be seen
(object permanence)
They are separate beings from the people and objects around them
They realize that their actions can cause things to happen in the world around
them
During this earliest stage of cognitive development, infants and toddlers acquire
knowledge through sensory experiences and manipulating objects. A child's entire
experience at the earliest period of this stage occurs through basic reflexes, senses,
and motor responses.
The cognitive development that occurs during this period takes place over a
relatively short period of time and involves a great deal of growth. Children not only
learn how to perform physical actions such as crawling and walking; they also learn
a great deal about language from the people with whom they interact. Piaget also
broke this stage down into a number of different substages. It is during the final
part of the sensorimotor stage that early representational thought emerges.
Piaget believed that developing object permanence or object constancy, the
understanding that objects continue to exist even when they cannot be seen, was an
important element at this point of development.
By learning that objects are separate and distinct entities and that they have an
existence of their own outside of individual perception, children are then able to
begin to attach names and words to objects.
Ages: 2 to 7 Years
Children begin to think symbolically and learn to use words and pictures to
represent objects.
Children at this stage tend to be egocentric and struggle to see things from
the perspective of others.
While they are getting better with language and thinking, they still tend to
think about things in very concrete terms.
The foundations of language development may have been laid during the previous
stage, but it is the emergence of language that is one of the major hallmarks of the
preoperational stage of development.3
Children become much more skilled at pretend play during this stage of
development, yet continue to think very concretely about the world around them.
At this stage, kids learn through pretend play but still struggle with logic and taking
the point of view of other people. They also often struggle with understanding the
idea of constancy.
For example, a researcher might take a lump of clay, divide it into two equal pieces,
and then give a child the choice between two pieces of clay to play with. One piece
of clay is rolled into a compact ball while the other is smashed into a flat pancake
shape. Since the flat shape looks larger, the preoperational child will likely choose
that piece even though the two pieces are exactly the same size.
Ages: 7 to 11 Years
During this stage, children begin to thinking logically about concrete events
While children are still very concrete and literal in their thinking at this point in
development, they become much more adept at using logic.2 The egocentrism of
the previous stage begins to disappear as kids become better at thinking about how
other people might view a situation.
While thinking becomes much more logical during the concrete operational state, it
can also be very rigid. Kids at this point in development tend to struggle with
abstract and hypothetical concepts.
During this stage, children also become less egocentric and begin to think about how
other people might think and feel. Kids in the concrete operational stage also begin
to understand that their thoughts are unique to them and that not everyone else
necessarily shares their thoughts, feelings, and opinions.
The Concrete Operational Stage in Cognitive Development
Ages: 12 and Up
At this stage, the adolescent or young adult begins to think abstractly and reason
about hypothetical problems
The final stage of Piaget's theory involves an increase in logic, the ability to use
deductive reasoning, and an understanding of abstract ideas.3 At this point, people
become capable of seeing multiple potential solutions to problems and think more
scientifically about the world around them.
The ability to thinking about abstract ideas and situations is the key hallmark of the
formal operational stage of cognitive development. The ability to systematically plan
for the future and reason about hypothetical situations are also critical abilities that
emerge during this stage.
It is important to note that Piaget did not view children's intellectual development as
a quantitative process; that is, kids do not just add more information and knowledge
to their existing knowledge as they get older. Instead, Piaget suggested that there is
a qualitative change in how children think as they gradually process through these
four stages.4 A child at age 7 doesn't just have more information about the world
than he did at age 2; there is a fundamental change in how he thinks about the
world.
Schema Theory
General concept of schema theory, one of the cognitivist learning theories, was
firstly introduced in 1932 through the work of British psychologist Sir Frederic
Bartlett) (some suggest it was first introduced in 1926 by Jean Piaget) and was
further developed mostly in 1970s by American educational psychologist Richard
Anderson). Schema theory describes how knowledge is acquired, processed and
organized. The starting assumption of this theory is that “very act of comprehension
involves one’s knowledge of the world”4). According to this theory, knowledge is a
network of mental frames or cognitive constructs called schema (pl. schemata).
Schemata organize knowledge stored in the long-term memory.
The term schema is nowadays often used even outside cognitive psychology and
refers to a mental framework humans use to represent and organize remembered
information. Schemata (“the building blocks of cognition”) present our personal
simplified view over reality derived from our experience and prior knowledge, they
enable us to recall, modify our behavior, concentrate attention on key information),
or try to predict most likely outcomes of events. According to David Rumelhart).
Schemata also expand and change in time, due to acquisition of new information,
but deeply installed schemata are inert and slow in changing. This could provide an
explanation to why some people live with incorrect or inconsistent beliefs rather then
changing them. When new information is retrieved, if possible, it will be assimilated
into existing schema (ta) or related schema(ta) will be changed (accommodated) in
order to integrate the new information. For example: during schooling process a
child learns about mammals and develops corresponding schema. When a child
hears that a porpoise is a mammal as well, it first tries to fit it into the mammals
schema: it's warm-blooded, air-breathing, is born with hair and gives live birth. Yet it
lives in water unlike most mammals and so the mammals schema has to be
accommodated to fit in the new information.
According to Brown, when reading a text, it alone does not carry the meaning a
reader attribute to it. The meaning is formed by the information and cultural and
emotional context the reader brings through his schemata more than by the text
itself. Text comprehension and retention therefore depend mostly on the schemata
the reader possesses, among which the content schema should be one of most
important, as suggested by Al-Issa).
Schema theory emphasizes importance of general knowledge and concepts that will
help forming schemata. In educational process the task of teachers would be to help
learners to develop new schemata and establish connections between them. Also,
due to the importance of prior knowledge, teachers should make sure that students
have it.
“The schemata a person already possesses are a principal determiner of what will be
learned from a new text.”
Social Learning Theory, theorized by Albert Bandura, posits that people learn from
one another, via observation, imitation, and modeling. The theory has often been
called a bridge between behaviorist and cognitive learning theories because it
encompasses attention, memory, and motivation.
Key Concepts
People learn through observing others’ behavior, attitudes, and outcomes of those
behaviors. “Most human behavior is learned observationally through modeling: from
observing others, one forms an idea of how new behaviors are performed, and on
later occasions this coded information serves as a guide for action.” (Bandura).Social
learning theory explains human behavior in terms of continuous reciprocal
interaction between cognitive, behavioral, and environmental influences.
Reciprocal Determinism
Bandura believed in “reciprocal determinism”, that is, the world and a person’s
behavior cause each other, while behaviorism essentially states that one’s
environment causes one’s behavior[2], Bandura, who was studying adolescent
aggression, found this too simplistic, and so in addition he suggested that behavior
causes environment as well[3]. Later, Bandura soon considered personality as an
interaction between three components: the environment, behavior, and one’s
psychological processes (one’s ability to entertain images in minds and language).
Social learning theory has sometimes been called a bridge between behaviorist and
cognitive learning theories because it encompasses attention, memory, and
motivation. The theory is related to Vygotsky’s Social Development Theory and
Lave’s Situated Learning, which also emphasize the importance of social learning.
Cummins’ Approaches
GOALS
Theories
• Threshold Theory
• Language attributes are not apart in the cognitive system, but transfer readily
and are interactive.
• Lessons learned in one language can readily transfer into the other language.
Parts
• The thoughts that accompany talking, reading, writing and listening come
from the same central engine. There is on integrated source of thought.
• People have the capacity to store easily many languages, and can also
function in many languages with ease.
• Speaking, listening, reading or writing any of the languages helps the whole
cognitive system to develop. However, if made to operate in an insufficiently
developed language, the system will not function at its best. Operating in a
poorly developed L2, will result in poor quality and quantity of what they learn
in complex curriculum materials. Oral and written form may appear weak and
impoverished.
• When one or both languages are not functioning fully cognitive functioning
and academic performance may be negatively affected.
Thresholds Theory
• Balanced Bilinguals
• Limited Bilinguals
Context embedded
Comprehension
Speaking
Pronunciation
Vocabulary
Grammar
Cognitive/Academic Language Proficiency (CALP)
Context reduced
Analysis
Synthesis
Meanings
Creative Compositions
BICS/CALP
Limitations
BICS/CALP
• Pointing to objects
• Head nods
• Hand gestures
• Intonation
Quadrants
Q1
Q4