0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
22 просмотров4 страницы
The student disagrees with the SOGIE bill from sociological, anthropological, and political science perspectives. From a sociological perspective, the student believes the bill could cause the breaking of laws and God's word by redefining gender roles. From an anthropological view, the student disagrees with allowing changes to birth certificates or restricting religious teachings. Politically, the student agrees with fighting discrimination but has concerns the bill may disrespect religious freedom and affect other laws.
The student disagrees with the SOGIE bill from sociological, anthropological, and political science perspectives. From a sociological perspective, the student believes the bill could cause the breaking of laws and God's word by redefining gender roles. From an anthropological view, the student disagrees with allowing changes to birth certificates or restricting religious teachings. Politically, the student agrees with fighting discrimination but has concerns the bill may disrespect religious freedom and affect other laws.
The student disagrees with the SOGIE bill from sociological, anthropological, and political science perspectives. From a sociological perspective, the student believes the bill could cause the breaking of laws and God's word by redefining gender roles. From an anthropological view, the student disagrees with allowing changes to birth certificates or restricting religious teachings. Politically, the student agrees with fighting discrimination but has concerns the bill may disrespect religious freedom and affect other laws.
GRADE 11- OUR LADY OF THE HOLY ROSARY In sociology aspects, I (agree/ disagree) to this bill because...
As a catholic for my own point of view and opinion I disagree, I am not
against LGBTQIA but it can be the cause of the breaking of other laws and the word of our lord because we all know that man is only for woman and woman is only for man. We can respect them and not judge them because that is our own decision as a person, we can give them freedom but do not overdo it by forgetting to follow the word of the Lord. It is a person's choice to respect LGBTQIA but not to the point where we forget God. Because they are no longer demanding anti- discrimination but their power to be free to do what they want to do just like in the implementation that gays can use the Cr that is only for women, it also lacks the privacy of women because no matter what they say and do they still remain men, women will also lose the right to complain if they do not agree with it. Many people experience discrimination in our country not just LGBTQIA. SOGIE bill is no longer about discriminating against LGBTQIA but they are seeking special treatment and power. In Anthropology aspects, I (agree/ disagree) to this bill because...
I disagree because no matter what happens, you are still a man
and a woman, even if it is possible to change your appearance and feelings, but the most important thing is that we treat them well as a person and also and do not judge their personality. But in SOGIE BILL some actions of LGBTQIA are no longer respecting other laws just like you cannot put on the birth certificate the gender of a newborn child and still have to wait for it to have its own thinking, In a decade of years it used to be the gender of a newborn is stated because we believe that there are only two genders created by our Lord, but now there is a lot of gender fighting LGBTQIA and also Pastors and Teachers in public places such as schools are forbidden to teach Homosexuality, Same Sex Relationship ship and Marriage. it proves that it lacks religious freedom in public places to preach the word of God. In Political Scientist aspects, I (agree/ disagree) to this bill because... I agree with what governments say and LGBTQIA fighting for, they fighting for equal treatment to all people regardless of their gender because we are all created by the lord, But we cannot avoid that other governments do not agree accordingly because as a member of politics we should think carefully if it is really worth it, this law shows that there is no respect for our Lord because it can lead to committing a crime just like other senator said. Many laws can be affected once it is implemented Many people experience the discrimination, do they also need to filed a case like this? so that everyone can hear them? It’s up to the person if you have respect for your neighbor, you will not judge them and let them express themselves. Let us always think and expand our knowledge on how to handle such a situation like discrimination.
The LGBTQIA+ Community and Betrayal: Heterophobia vs. Homophobia And How the Alphabet Mob Is Erasing Heterosexuality and Trying to Bully Us “Straights” into the “Closet” From Tolerance to Equality to Heterophobia
Injustice to Hero’s Mother Before June of 1872, tragedy struck the Rizal family. Doña Teodora was suddenly arrested on a malicious charge that she and her brother, Jose Alberto, tried to poison the latter’s perfidious wife. Jose Alberto, a rich Biñan Illustrado, had just returned from a business trip in Europe. During his absence his wife abandoned their home and children. When he arrived in Biñan, he found her living with another man. Infuriated by her infidelity, he planned to divorce her. Doña Teodora, to avert family scandal, persuaded him to forgive his wife. The family trouble was amicably settled, and Jose Alberto lived again with his wife. However the evil wife with the connivance of the Spanish lieutenant of the Guardia Civil, filed a case in court accusing her husband and Doña Teodora of attempting to poison her. This lieutenant happened to have an ax to grind against the Rizal’s family, because at one time Don Francisco (Rizal’s father) refused to give him fodder for his ho