You are on page 1of 8

Digitally signed

by Joseph Zernik
Human Rights Alert DN: cn=Joseph
Zernik, o, ou,
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750 email=jz12345@e
Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net arthlink.net, c=US
Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Date: 2011.01.29
17:02:19 +02'00'
Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

11-01-28 William M. Windsor v. Maid of the Mist Corporation, at al. (10-A690) in the Supreme
Court of the United States: a) Suggested request for a valid record of denial, certified
by Justice Thomas, and b) Records provided on January 28, 2011 by Mr Windsor.
Attached are:

1) Suggestion left on Mr Windsor web site, for a request in William M. Windsor v. Maid of the Mist Corporation, at al.
(10-A690) for service of a valid record,certified by Justice Thomas, of the denial of the application.

2) Records provided by Mr Windsor, of notices he received by mail from the US Supreme Court:

Page# Date Caption/Number Language Signature

4. January William M. Windsor “The application for a stay in the Sincerely,


13, 2011 v. Maid of the Mist above-entitled case has been William K. Suter, Clerk
Corporation, at al. presented to Justice Thomas, who on []
No. 10-A690 January 13, 2011, denied the By Danny Bickell
application.” Staff Attorney
6. January In Re William M. Windsor “The petition for a writ of mandamus Sincerely,
18, 2011 No. 10-690 is denied” []
William K. Suter, Clerk
7. January In Re ·William Windsor “The petition for a writ of mandamus Sincerely,
18, 2011 No. 10-632 is denied.” []
William K. Suter, Clerk
8. January In Re William Windsor “The petition for a writ of mandamus Sincerely,
18, 2011 No. 10-633 is denied.” []
William K. Suter, Clerk
z Page 2/3 January 29, 2011

11-01-28 William M. Windsor v. Maid of the Mist Corporation, at al. (10-A690) in the Supreme
Court of the United States, suggested request, posted on Mr Windsor’s web site:
http://www.lawlessamerica.com
January 29, 2011
RE: William M. Windsor v. Maid of the Mist Corporation, at al. (10-A690) - Suggested request, to be filed
with Justice Clarence Thomas for a valid and effectual, certified records of the denial.
Dear Mr Windsor:
Thanks for providing on January 28, 2011, the attached records, dated January 13-18, 2011, which you have
recently received by mail from the Supreme Court of the United States.
I am no attorney, but I have substantial experience in fraud detection in the State of California and the US
courts. [i ]
Conditions in the office of Clerk William Suter of the US Supreme Court, including the issuance of invalid
letters of “denial”, combined with denial of access to court records, were subject of the recent request for
impeachment of Clerk Suter. In my opinion conditions in the office of Clerk Suter amount to fraud on the
people. [ii ]
The strongest evidence of fraud by the office of Clerk Suter, among the records, which you have provided on
January 28, 2011, is in the letter by Staff Attorney Danny Bickell, dated January 13, 2011. The letter
purported to notice the January 13, 2011 denial by Justice Clarence Thomas of your Application under
William M. Windsor v. Maid of the Mist Corporation, at al. (10-A690).
In order to produce further, stronger evidence of the suspected fraud by the Office of Clerk Suter in the case,
referenced above, I suggest that you file request under the same caption, as described below, with Justice
Clarence Thomas (and serve it on all parties) for Due Process service of a valid and effectual record, certified
by Justice Thomas, of the denial of your application.
The suggested request is not likely to gain you, in person, any remedy. However, it I believe that in filing such
request, whether Justice Thomas and Clerk Suter respond or not, and by advertising their response, or lack
there of, you would be providing an important service for the People.
Conditions, which were created by the justices and the clerk of the US Supreme Court today, amount in my
opinion to what is called "Shell Game Fraud", or “Confidence Trick”:
Maybe Justice Thomas indeed denied your application, may not… maybe there is a valid record of the denial,
certified by Justice Thomas, may there is none... what form the records is in, nobody is permitted to know....

Joseph Zernik, PhD

Human Rights Alert (NGO)


z Page 3/3 January 29, 2011

_________
Outline of the Suggested Request in William M. Windsor v. Maid of the Mist Corporation, at al. (10-
A690):
• The suggested request may be styled along the lines of: "Request for service of valid and effectual record
of the January 13, 2011, denial of the application, certified by Justice Thomas".
• In the request you may explain that the letter dated January 13, 2011, by Staff Attorney Danny Bickell
appears invalid on its face:
o Danny Bickell is not a sworn Deputy Clerk, upon information and belief (Danny Bickell himself
admitted that fact to Dr Joseph Zernik in a phone conversation in April 2010).
o Danny Bickell did not sign the January 13, 2011, as "Deputy Clerk", either.
o Therefore, the January 13, 2011, letter should not be deemed by the Justice Thomas as a valid notice
by the office of Clerk Suter of the US Supreme Court.
• Furthermore, no valid record, certified by Justice Thomas was attached to the January 13, 2011, letter by
Danny Bickell.
• Therefore, you are requesting Due Process notice and service by Clerk of the Court William Suter on
parties in William M. Windsor v. Maid of the Mist Corporation, at al. (10-A690) of the valid and effectual
record of denial of the application, certified by Justice Thomas.
You may further explain the following regarding "valid and effectual record of denial of the application,
certified by Justice Thomas.":
• There are several forms that such a valid and effectual record, certified by Justice Thomas, may be in:
o Written Order, hand signed by Justice Thomas;
o Hand inscription by Justice Thomas on the face of the Application under William M. Windsor v. Maid
of the Mist Corporation, at al. (10-A690), pursuant to the Rules of the Supreme Court.
o An electronic record including some form of digital signature by Justice Thomas.
o Some other form, yet to be discovered by the People, and known only to the justices and the clerk.
Therefore, you request service on the parties of whatever form of record is deemed today by Justice Thomas
and Clerk William Suter as valid and effectual, good faith and credit record of the denial of the application,
certified by Justice Thomas.
LINKS

i
11-01-06 Joseph Zernik, PhD, Biographical Sketch
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/H
ii
11-01-25 Request for Impeachment of US Supreme Court Clerk WILLIAM SUTER s
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/47539382/H
Supreme Court of the United States
Office of the Clerk
Washington, DC 20543-0001
William IL Suter
Clerk of the Court
(202) >1 7!l-~~Oll
January 13, 2011

Mr. William M. Windsor


P.O. Box 68\236
Marietta, GA 30068

Re: William M. Windsor


v. Maid of the Mist Corporation, at al.
Application No. 10A690

Deal' Mr. \Vindsor:

The application for a stay in the above-entitled case has been


presented to Justice Thomas, who on January 13, 2011, denied the
application.

This letter has been sent to those designated on the attached


notification list.

Sincerely,

William K. Suter, Clerk

Danny Bickell
Staff Attorney
Supreme Court of the United States
Office of the Clerk
Washington, DC 20543-0001
Willinm IC Suter
Clerk of the CUllIt
(202) iJ7H-3011
NOTIFICATION LIST

Ml'. William M. Windsor


P.O. Box 681236
Marietta, GA 30068

Mr. Carl H. Anderson, Jr.


Hawkins & Parnell
4000 SunTl'ust Plaza
303 Peachtree Street, NE
Atlanta, OA 30308·3243
Supreme Court of the United States
Office of the Clerk
Washington, DC 20543-0001
William l{. Suter
Clerk 0[' the Court
(202) iJ79-3011
January 18, 2011

Mr. William M. Windsor


P.O. Box 681236
Marietta, GA 30068

Re: In Re ·William Windsor


No. 10-632

Dear Mr. Vi.Tindsor:

rrhc Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case:

The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

Sincerely,

W~/:.~
William K. Suter, Clerk
Supreme Court of the United States
Office of the Clerk
Washington, DC 20543-0001
William K Suter
elm·l, of tho CoU!·t
(202) 479-3011
January 18, 2011

Mr. William M. Windsor


P.O. Box 681236
Marietta, GA 30068

Re: In Re William M. Windsor


No. 10-690

Dear Mr. vVindsor:

The Court today entered tho following order in the above-entitled case:

The petition for a writ of mandam us is denied.

Sincerely,

W~/:.p;;-
William K. Suter, Clerk
Supreme Court of the United States
Office of the Clerk
Washington, DC 20543-0001
William I(. Suter
Clerk of the Court
(202) 479·::101]
January 18, 2011

Mr. \Villiam 1\11. Windsor


P.O. Box 681236
Marietta, GA 30068

Re: In Re William Windsor


No. 10-633

Dear Mr. vVindsor:

The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case:

The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

Sincerely,

fj)~/::~
William K. Suter, Clerk