SAN BEDA UNIVERSITY

College of Law
COURSE SYLLABUS

COURSE CODE:
COURSE TITLE: SALES AND LEASE
COURSE CREDIT: 3 UNITS
COURSE PREREQUISITE/S:
FACULTY: ________________________________
EMAIL ADDRESS: ____________@sanbeda.edu.ph
TERM/ACADEMIC YEAR: FIRST SEMESTER SCHOOL YEAR 2020-2021
DAY/TIME/ROOM/SECTION:
COURSE DELIVERY MODE: FULL ONLINE
CONSULTATION DAY/TIME:

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

A comprehensive study of the laws on the contracts of sales and lease which
examines the concept, documents, rights and obligations of parties, actions for
breach, remedies of the parties and extinguishment.

COURSE GOALS: Expected College of Law Graduate Attributes (ELGAs)

Know and fully understand the laws and their applications, master the provisions,
develop critical and analytical thinking, effective in written and oral
communication, logical reasoning, and sound judgment, exercise of proper
professional and ethical responsibilities

LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES (LOs):

1. Knowledge/Remembering: define, list, recognize

2. Comprehension/Understanding: describe, explain, identify, recognize
3. Application/Applying: choose, demonstrate, implement, perform
4. Analysis/Analyzing: analyze, categorize, compare, differentiate
5. Evaluation/Evaluating: assess, critique, evaluate, rank, rate
6. Synthesis/Creating: construct, design, formulate, organize, synthesize

Upon completion of the Course Title course, the student is expected to be able to:

Expected College of
Law Graduate LEARNING OUTCOMES (LOs)
Attributes (ELGAs)
Critical and analytical LO1. Explain how the law governs the contracts, their validity and the
thinking rights and obligations of the parties.
Effective in written and LO2. Analyze the practical and policy implications of current and
oral communication proposed statutes, regulations, judicial rulings, legal arguments, and
Logical reasoning strategies in preparing a Legal Case.
Sound judgment LO3. Assess client concerns and translating them into responsive legal
Exercise of proper arguments and strategies.
professional and ethical LO4. Utilize legal research tools to gather information that aids in the

1
 responsibilities analysis of legal issues in submitting the Research Paper.
ASSESSMENT/GRADING SYSTEM:

The student will be graded according to the following:

Percentage
(Weight is based
Scope of Work
Requirements (Based on the Learning Outcomes) on the
(Individual)
importance of
the LO)
LO1 Class recitations, Quizzes, Case Digests, Individual
LO2 and discussion Individual
LO3 Individual
LO4 - - Research Paper, Case Study

Class standing before Midterms Individual 16.67%

Midterm Exams Individual 16.67%
Class Standing after Midterms Individual 33.33%
Final Exams Individual 33.33%
TOTAL 100

LEARNING PLAN:

Design or the structure of the course that includes content/topics to be covered;

learning resources to be used; weekly schedule of the topics to be taken up; and
the learning methods to be utilized that are most likely to lead students towards
the goals and learning outcomes that were defined.

LEARNING
WEEK/
METHODS
TOPIC/CONTENT LEARNING DATE
(activities designed or
(arrangement or sequence of RESOURCES (Schedule of
deployed by the
the major topics is based on a (print and non-print each Topic,
teacher to bring about,
logical order) materials and online/ Assign, Exam
or create the
open-access resources) for the entire
conditions for
semester)
learning)

Course Introduction
Course overview Syllabus Aug. 10-15, Lecture
Course assignments 2020 Discussion
Course requirements, grading
system

Module 1:

I. Contract of Sale, Concepts • Syllabus Aug. 24-29, Recitation

(Articles 1458, 1638, 1466- • Textbooks (Chapter 1) 2020 Case study &
1468, New Civil Code) • Supreme Court reporting
Decisions (SCRA) Discussion/lecture
Quiz
Cases:
1. Pulumbarit, Sr. vs. Court of
Appeals, 772 SCRA 244,
G.R. Nos. 153745-46

2
 LEARNING
WEEK/
METHODS
TOPIC/CONTENT LEARNING DATE
(activities designed or
(arrangement or sequence of RESOURCES (Schedule of
deployed by the
the major topics is based on a (print and non-print each Topic,
teacher to bring about,
logical order) materials and online/ Assign, Exam
or create the
open-access resources) for the entire
conditions for
semester)
learning)
October 14, 2015
2. Akang vs. Municipality of
Isulan, Sultan Kudarat
Province, 699 SCRA 745,
G.R. No. 186014 June 26,
2013
3. Quiroga vs. Parsons, 38 Phil
501
4. CIR vs. Arnoldus Carpentry,
159 SCRA 199
5. Heirs of Fausto C. Ignacio
vs. Home Bankers Savings
and Trust Company, 689
SCRA 173, G.R. No. 177783
January 23, 2013
6. Far East Bank and Trust
Company vs. Philippine
Deposit Insurance
Corporation, G.R. No.
172983, July 22, 2015)

II. Object of Sale (Articles

1306, 1459-1465, New Civil
Code)

Case:
Department of Agrarian Reform,
Quezon City vs. Carriedo, 781
SCRA 301, G.R. No. 176549
January 20, 2016)

III. Price (Articles 1469-1474,

New Civil Code)

Case:
Mapalo vs. Mapalo, 17 SCRA
114; Swedish Match vs. Court of
Appeals, 20 October 2004)

Module 2:

I. Formation / Perfection of • Syllabus Aug. 31-Sept. Recitation

Contract of Sale (Articles • Textbooks (Chapter 1) 5, 2020 Case study &
1475-1488, 1325-1326, 1319, • Supreme Court reporting
1874, 1581, 1403New Civil Decisions (SCRA) Discussion/lecture
Code) Quiz

Cases:
1. Limson vs. CA, 357 SCRA

3
 LEARNING
WEEK/
METHODS
TOPIC/CONTENT LEARNING DATE
(activities designed or
(arrangement or sequence of RESOURCES (Schedule of
deployed by the
the major topics is based on a (print and non-print each Topic,
teacher to bring about,
logical order) materials and online/ Assign, Exam
or create the
open-access resources) for the entire
conditions for
semester)
learning)
209; San Miguel Properties
vs. Huang, 336 SCRA 2000
2. Atkins, Kroll & Co. vs. Cua
Hian Tek, 102 Phil 948
3. Sanchez vs. Rigos, 45 SCRA
368
4. Ang Yu Asuncion vs. CA,
December 2, 1994
5. Bible Baptist Church vs. CA,
26 November 2004
6. Osmeña III vs. Power Sector
Assets and Liabilities
Management Corporation,
771 SCRA 559, G.R. No.
212686 September 28, 2015
7. Repuela vs. Estate of Spouses
Larawan and Bacus, G.R. No. Sept. 7-12,
219638, December 7, 2016 2020
8. Arcaina vs. Ingram, G.R. No.
196444, February 15, 2017
9. Sepe vs. Heirs of Kilang, G.R.
no. 199766, April 10, 2019
10. Trotin vs. Bongo, G.R.
No. 212840, August 28, 2019
11. Heirs of Alido vs.
Campano, G.R. No. 226065,
July 29, 2019
12. Racelis vs. Spouses
Javier, G.R. No. 189609,
January 29, 2018
13. Ayala Land, Inc. vs. ASB
Realty Corporation, G.R. No.
210043, September 26, 2018

II. Parties to the Contract of

Sale (Articles 1489-1494, New
Civil Code)

Cases:
1. Fullido vs. Grilli, 785 SCRA
278, G.R. No. 215014
February 29, 2016
2. Melecio Domingo v. Spouses
Genaro Molina and Elena
Molina, substituted by Ester
Molina, G.R. No. 200274,

4
 LEARNING
WEEK/
METHODS
TOPIC/CONTENT LEARNING DATE
(activities designed or
(arrangement or sequence of RESOURCES (Schedule of
deployed by the
the major topics is based on a (print and non-print each Topic,
teacher to bring about,
logical order) materials and online/ Assign, Exam
or create the
open-access resources) for the entire
conditions for
semester)
learning)
April 20, 2016

5
 LEARNING
WEEK/
METHODS
TOPIC/CONTENT LEARNING DATE
(activities designed or
(arrangement or sequence of RESOURCES (Schedule of
deployed by the
the major topics is based on a (print and non-print each Topic,
teacher to bring about,
logical order) materials and online/ Assign, Exam
or create the
open-access resources) for the entire
conditions for
semester)
learning)

Module 3:

I. Obligations of the Seller • Syllabus Sept. 14-19, Recitation

(Articles 1163, 1495-1506, • Textbooks (Chapter 1) 2020 Case study &
1521-1544, New Civil Code) • Supreme Court reporting
Decisions (SCRA) Discussion/lecture
Cases: Quiz
1. Banzon vs. Cruz, 45 SCRA
475
2. EDCA Publishing vs. 184
SCRA 614
3. Phil. Suburban Development
Corp. vs. Auditor General, 63
SCRA 397
4. Rosaroso vs. Soria, 699 SCRA
232, G.R. No. 194846 June
19, 2013
5. Skunac Corporation vs.
Sylianteng, 723 SCRA 625,
G.R. No. 205879 April 23,
2014
6. Manigque-Stone vs. Cattleya
Land, Inc., 802 SCRA 173,
G.R. No. 195975 September 5,
2016
7. Spring Homes Subdivision
Co., Inc. vs. Tablada, Jr., 815
SCRA 114, G.R. No. 200009
January 23, 2017
8. Edu vs.Gomez, 129 SCRA
601; Duran vs. IAC, 138
SCRA 489
9. Spouses Manlan vs. Spouses
Beltran, G.R. No. 222530,
October 16, 2019
10. Spouses Salitico vs. Heirs
of Resurreccion, G.R. No.
240199, April 10, 2019

6
 LEARNING
WEEK/
METHODS
TOPIC/CONTENT LEARNING DATE
(activities designed or
(arrangement or sequence of RESOURCES (Schedule of
deployed by the
the major topics is based on a (print and non-print each Topic,
teacher to bring about,
logical order) materials and online/ Assign, Exam
or create the
open-access resources) for the entire
conditions for
semester)
learning)

Module 4:

I. Conditions and Warranties • Syllabus Sept. 28-Oct. Recitation

(Articles 1545-1581, New Civil • Textbooks (Chapter 1) 3, 2020 Case study &
Code) • Supreme Court reporting
Decisions (SCRA) Discussion/lecture
Cases: Quiz
1. JM Tuazon & Co., Inc. vs.
CA, 94 SCRA 413
2. Escaler vs. CA, 138 SCRA 1;
Moles vs. IAC, 169 SCRA 777
3. Nutrimix Feeds Corporation
vs. CA, 25 October 2004
4. Philippine Steel Coating
Corp. vs. Quinones, G.R. No.
194533, February 15, 2017
5. Spouses Batalla vs. Prudential
Bank, G.R. No. 200676,
March 25, 2019
6. Jurado vs. Spouses Chai, G.R.
No. 236516, March 25, 2019

Module 5:

I. Documents of Title (Articles • Syllabus Oct. 3-Oct. 9, Recitation

1507-1520, New Civil Code) • Textbooks (Chapter 1) 2020 Case study &
• Supreme Court reporting
Decisions (SCRA) Discussion/lecture
Quiz

Mid-Term Examinations Oct. 12-17,

2020

7
 LEARNING
WEEK/
METHODS
TOPIC/CONTENT LEARNING DATE
(activities designed or
(arrangement or sequence of RESOURCES (Schedule of
deployed by the
the major topics is based on a (print and non-print each Topic,
teacher to bring about,
logical order) materials and online/ Assign, Exam
or create the
open-access resources) for the entire
conditions for
semester)
learning)

Module 6:

I. R ig hts and Ob liga tions • Syllabus Oct. 19-24, Recitation

of the V endee (A rt icles • Textbooks (Chapter 1) 2020 Case study &
158 2-1 59 3, N ew C ivil • Supreme Court reporting
Decisions (SCRA) Discussion/lecture
Code)
Quiz
• Repub lic Act N o. 65 52

Cas es :
1. Arra Realty Corporation vs.
Spouse Arguelles, 20
September 2004
2. Laforteza vs. Machuca, 333
SCRA 643
3. Vda. De Mistica vs. Naguiat,
418 SCRA 73
4. Fedman Development
Corporation vs. Agcaoili, G.
R. No. 165025; August 31,
2011
5. Heirs of Cardenas vs. The
Christian and Missionary Oct. 26-31,
Alliance of the Philippines, 2020
Inc. G.R. No. 222614, March
20, 2019
6. Malabanan vs. Spouses
Montano, G.R. No. 187225,
March 6, 2019
7. EEG Development
Corporation vs. Heirs of De
Castro, G.R. No. 219694,
June 26, 2019
8. Pablo Uy vs. Heirs of Julita
Uy, G.R. No. 227460,
December 5, 2019
9. Spouses Carlos vs. Tolentino,
G.R. No. 234533, June 27,
2018
10. Villamil vs. Spouses
Erguiza, G. R. No. 195999,
June 20, 2018

8
 LEARNING
WEEK/
METHODS
TOPIC/CONTENT LEARNING DATE
(activities designed or
(arrangement or sequence of RESOURCES (Schedule of
deployed by the
the major topics is based on a (print and non-print each Topic,
teacher to bring about,
logical order) materials and online/ Assign, Exam
or create the
open-access resources) for the entire
conditions for
semester)
learning)

II. Act ions fo r B rea ch of

Cont ra ct of S a le (A rt icles
159 4-1 59 9, N ew C ivil
Code)

• Repub lic Act N o. 41 22

Cas es :
1. Levi Hermanos, Inc. vs.
Gervacio, 69 Phil 52
2. Zayas vs. Luneta Motor
Company, 117 SCRA 726
3. Tajanlangit vs. Southern
Motors, Inc. 101 Phil 606
4. Cruz vs. Filipinas Investment
& Finance Corp., 23 SCRA
791
5. PCI Leasing and Finance,
Inc. vs. Giraffe-X Creative
Imaging, Inc., 527 SCRA 405,
G.R. No. 142618 July 12,
2007
6. Nolasco vs. Cuerpo, G. R. No.
210215, December 9, 2015
7. Moldex Realty vs. Saberon,
G.R. No. 176289, April 8,
2013
8. Spouses Domingo vs. Spouses
Manzano, G.R. No. 201883,
November, 16, 2016
9. Gregorio vs. Crisologo, G.R.
No. 210215, December 9,
2015
10. Delta Dev. And Management
Services vs. Enriquez, G.R.
No. 168646, January 12,
2011
11. Heirs of Macalalad vs. Rural
Bank of Pola, Inc. G.R. No.
200899, June 20, 2018
12. Mendoza vs. Spouses
Palugod, G. R. No. 220517,
June 20, 2018

9
 LEARNING
WEEK/
METHODS
TOPIC/CONTENT LEARNING DATE
(activities designed or
(arrangement or sequence of RESOURCES (Schedule of
deployed by the
the major topics is based on a (print and non-print each Topic,
teacher to bring about,
logical order) materials and online/ Assign, Exam
or create the
open-access resources) for the entire
conditions for
semester)
learning)

Module 7:

I. Extinguishment of Sale • Syllabus Nov. 3 -7, Recitation

(Articles 1600-1623, New Civil • Textbooks (Chapter 1) 2020 Case study &
Code) • Supreme Court reporting
Decisions (SCRA) Discussion/lecture
Cases: Quiz
1. Cebu State College of Science
and Technology (CSCST) vs.
Misterio, 759 SCRA 1, G.R.
No. 179025 June 17, 2015
2. Catangcatang vs. Legayada,
84 SCRA 51
3. Alonzo vs. IAC, 150 SCRA
259; Lee Chuy Realty
Corporation vs. Court of
Appeals, December 4, 1995
4. Anecita Gregorio v. Crisologo
Vda. De Culig, G.R. No.
180559; January 20, 2016

Module 8:

I. Assignment of Credits and • Syllabus Nov. 9-14, Recitation

Other Incorporeal Rights • Textbooks (Chapter 1) 2020 Case study &
(Articles 1624-1635 (New Civil • Supreme Court reporting
Code) Decisions (SCRA) Discussion/lecture
Quiz
Case:
Liam vs. United Coconut
Planters Bank, 793 SCRA 383,
G.R. No. 194664 June 15, 2016

II. General Provisions and Nov. 16-21,

Barter or Exchange (Articles 2020
1636-1641 (New Civil Code)

10
 LEARNING
WEEK/
METHODS
TOPIC/CONTENT LEARNING DATE
(activities designed or
(arrangement or sequence of RESOURCES (Schedule of
deployed by the
the major topics is based on a (print and non-print each Topic,
teacher to bring about,
logical order) materials and online/ Assign, Exam
or create the
open-access resources) for the entire
conditions for
semester)
learning)

Module 9:

I. Lease (Articles 1642-1679, • Syllabus Nov. 23-Dec. Recitation

New Civil Code) • Textbooks (Chapter 1) 5, 2020 Case study &
• Supreme Court reporting
Cases: Decisions (SCRA) Discussion/lecture
1. Malasarte vs. CA, 178 SCRA Quiz
310; Chua Tee Dee vs. CA,
GR 135721, 27 May 2004
2. Tagbilaran Integrated Sellers
Association vs. CA, 444 SCRA
193
3. Spouses Ricardo and Elena C.
Golez v. Meliton Nemeño,
G.R. No. 178317, September
23, 2015
4. Golez vs. Nemeño, 771 SCRA
306, G.R. No. 178317
September 23, 2015
5. Spouses Modomo vs. Spouses
Layug, G.R. No. 197722,
August 14, 2019
6. Booklight, Inc. vs. Tiu, G.R.
No. 213650, June 17, 2019
7. D.M. Ragasa Enterprises, Inc.
vs. Banco de Oro, Inc., G.R.
No. 190512, June 20, 2018
8. Mulle vs. Philippine National
Bank, G.R. No. 215922,
October 1, 2018

Module 10:

I. Special Provisions (Articles • Syllabus Dec. 7-11, Recitation

1680-1688, Family Code) • Textbooks (Chapter 1) 2020 Case study &
• Supreme Court reporting
Decisions (SCRA) Discussion/lecture
Quiz

11
 LEARNING
WEEK/
METHODS
TOPIC/CONTENT LEARNING DATE
(activities designed or
(arrangement or sequence of RESOURCES (Schedule of
deployed by the
the major topics is based on a (print and non-print each Topic,
teacher to bring about,
logical order) materials and online/ Assign, Exam
or create the
open-access resources) for the entire
conditions for
semester)
learning)

12
 LEARNING
WEEK/
METHODS
TOPIC/CONTENT LEARNING DATE
(activities designed or
(arrangement or sequence of RESOURCES (Schedule of
deployed by the
the major topics is based on a (print and non-print each Topic,
teacher to bring about,
logical order) materials and online/ Assign, Exam
or create the
open-access resources) for the entire
conditions for
semester)
learning)

Final Examinations Dec. 12-17,

2020

TEXTBOOK/REFERENCE BOOK:

1. Persons and Family Relations Law by Melencio S. Sta. Maria

2. Civil Code Volume 1, Persons and Family Relations
By Edgardo L. Paras
3. Family Code of the Philippines by Judge Ed Vincent S. Albano

13
POLICIES:
Policies and values that the teacher might want to communicate through the
syllabus concerning attendance, participation, academic integrity (e.g.
plagiarism, cheating, fabrication), missing assignments, missed exams, recording
classroom activities, online behavior during synchronous sessions, etc.

1. Attendance will be checked every meeting.

2. Students who are called to recite but absent shall get a grade of 60.
3. Students who missed a quiz will get a grade of 60.
4. Students are prohibited from recording the online class as this is a violation of the
Copyright of the Professor.

Prepared by:

Signature
_________________________
Faculty, College of Law

Approved by:

Signature
Atty. Marciano G. Delson
Dean, College of Law

Date Prepared by the Faculty

14