Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2.1 INTRODUCTION
With the spread of the internet, the world economy has become increas-
ingly close-knit, and the information and knowledge gap between coun-
tries and regions has narrowed markedly. As Thomas L. Friedman says
in his book The World Is Flat, a newly competitive country or region can
appear anywhere in the world. Under these conditions, it is commonly rec-
ognized that the competitiveness of a country or region depends largely on
its power to bring about innovation, and that much of that power comes
from universities.
In the discussion below, we will explain how university-industry collab-
oration (UIC) in Japan is contributing to the national and regional inno-
vation systems, mainly focusing on the example of Kyushu University.
University-industry collaboration is steadily expanding across Japan,
primarily through joint research and sponsored research, but also through
technology transfer and university start-ups. These contributions made by
Japanese universities through UIC are being highlighted in various poli-
cies set out by the government, such as the Science and Technology Basic
Plan. More and more achievements are being made. However, compared
with the USA which has great university-industry collaboration, the level
of UIC in Japan, and universities’ awareness of UIC, are both low. In the
next section we will discuss the contributions made through university-
industry collaboration by Japanese universities as a whole to the national
and regional innovation systems in Japan.
29
Government
Japan
7.7 19.1 71.4 1.7
(2005)
University
USA
12.2 13.6 70.1 4.1 Industry
(2004)
France
17.1 19.2 62.5 1.3
(2004)
UK
10.3 23.4 63.0 3.3
(2004)
EU-25 1.2
13.4 22.4 63.0
(2003)
Applied research
Company 6.3 19.6 74.1
Development
Non-profit research
20.3 35.8 43.9
organization
Like Japan, the USA boasts high levels of research in universities and in
industry. In this section, we compare the two countries with respect to
three types of UIC: joint/sponsored research, technology transfer and
university start-ups. This will allow us to clarify the background behind
50 000 160
45 000 140
Research expenditure 40 000
120
(million US$) 35 000
Japan/USA (%)
30 000 100
25 000 80
20 000 60
15 000
40
10 000
5000 20
0 0
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
Japan (million US$) 30 131 30 592 32 229 32 091 32 084 32 334 32 823 32 631 32 740 34 074 33 824
USA (million US$) 20 560 21 630 23 250 25 670 27 870 29 960 34 960 38 500 41 200 42 300 45 300
Japan/USA (%) 146.6 141.4 138.6 125.0 115.1 107.9 93.9 84.8 79.5 80.6 74.7
3500 14.0
3000 12.0
Research expenditure
Japan/USA (%)
2500 10.0
(million US$)
2000 8.0
1500 6.0
1000 4.0
500 2.0
0 0.0
FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
Japan (million US$) 262 323 371 403
USA (million US$) 2700 2880 2960 3180
Japan/USA (%) 9.7 11.2 12.5 12.7
(%)
100
80
60 98.8
93.0
40
20
7.0
0 1.2
Japan USA
From government and 98.8 93.0
others
From industry 1.2 7.0
Tokyo Institute of
53% 47%
Technology
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Note: Joint application means the application is the result of joint research with industry.
1. Before the National University Corporation Act was put into effect
in 2004, the right to any intellectual property invented within a
58.0
15 000
Japan/USA (%)
56.0
52.0
5000
50.0
0 48.0
2003 2004 2005 2006
Japan (number of 8078 8833 10 202 10 048
invention disclosure)
USA (number of 15 510 16 811 17 382 18 874
disclosure)
Japan/USA (%) 52.1 52.5 58.7 53.2
2500
2044
Licensing income (million US$)
2000
1500 1385
1000
500
29 10.7
0
2004 2005
Japan USA
Source: Data from Kyushu University (2008) and Kyushu University website.
IMAQ
Planning Group
Liaison Group
Design Group
Asia DLO
700 25 000
500 16 050
15 000
400 12 380
10 600
300
10 000
6890
6190
200
5000
100 179 243 329 388 567 579
0 0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Fiscal year
600 90000
64 030 70000
400 60000
48 980
50000
300 38 920
40000
200 30000
16 220 17 980
20000
100
10000
337 337 408 445 515 560
0 0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Fiscal year
1 1 1
University of Tokyo 1
2 2 2
Osaka University 2
3 3 3
Kyoto University 3
4 4 4
Tohoku University 4
5 5
Tokyo Institute of Technology 5
6 6 6
Kyushu University 6
7
8
8
9 9 9
Nagoya University 9
11 11
Hokkaido University
invention disclosures, patent applications and licenses (285, 294 and 205,
respectively in FY 2007) and by revenues from licensing ($194 600 in FY
2007) has also been increasing.
In addition, the university created a cumulative total of 53 business
ventures by 2007, ranking sixth among all Japanese universities.
As mentioned earlier, Kyushu University has a proud history as one of the
seven imperial universities. Today it is one of Japan’s major research-oriented
universities. Therefore, as shown in preceding sections, Kyushu University
has been among the highest-ranking universities in Japan in terms of the total
amount of research funding received from the government, businesses and so
on. In particular, in view of intensifying competition among universities due
to the incorporation of the national universities and ever-expanding UIC in
recent years, Kyushu University has made strenuous efforts to strengthen its
ties with business enterprises (specifically, to win joint/sponsored research
contracts). As a result, the university’s joint/sponsored research has grown
markedly in recent years, outpacing many of Japan’s major universities. This
suggests that the university’s contribution to the innovation system owes
largely to its growing volume of joint/sponsored research.
On the other hand, the volume of technology transfer by Kyushu
University is relatively small. Although the university is striving to
increase the numbers of inventions, patent applications and the amount
of licensing income and so on, they are not very large as compared with
other universities in Japan. This is due to Kyushu University’s strategy of
With the aim of understanding the condition of joint research with busi-
ness enterprises, Kyushu University carried out a questionnaire survey of
researchers in major postgraduate courses in natural science. The survey
covered a total of 181 joint research and sponsored research projects
carried out jointly by 155 researchers in the Faculty of Engineering/
Faculty of Information Science and Electrical Engineering (ISEE)2 and in
business enterprises.3
Unknown
1.7%
SMEs
26.1%
Large
company
72.3
N = 119
Aomori 0.8%
Kumamoto
Kyoto 0.8% 0.8%
Oita 1.7%
Saitama, 0.8%
Mie 1.7%
Unknown
Nagasaki
0.8%
1.7%
Hiroshima
2.5%
Hyogo 5.9%
Tokyo
Osaka 5.9% 44.5%
Kanagawa
6.7%
Fukuoka
Aichi 8.4%
16.8%
N = 119
(%)
0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0
Training of 30.3
company personnel
Co-publications 10.1
Monitoring 7.6
N = 119
Recruitment 6.7
Other 4.2
Figure 2.16 The reasons for companies collaborating with the university
(%)
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0
Products 36.1
Other 0.8
N = 119
NA 1.7
prise, ‘Inspiration of new research field’ ranks top (61.3 per cent), followed
by ‘Funding from the company for research’ (56.3 per cent) and ‘Benefits
for students’ education’ (46.2 per cent) (Figure 2.17).
It is evident that many university researchers consider working in close
is now carried out between the business enterprise and the university
(organization – organization). We will introduce organization-level coop-
eration as a tool that is effective in the cooperation of Japanese universities
with companies, particularly in the promotion of joint research.
Organization-level cooperation is a needs-oriented joint research system
whereby IMAQ gathers and organizes university teaching staff who wish
to respond to the needs of a client (for example, a business enterprise). It
is also a management-oriented system that has introduced measures to
eliminate clients’ uneasiness about the management of intellectual prop-
erty and the control of research progress (Box 2.1). This new scheme has
dramatically improved clients’ satisfaction.
As a result, the number of joint research projects based on this scheme is
increasing markedly every year. The amount of funding per joint research
project is also increasing. The main clients are large companies.
Another salient characteristic of organization-level cooperation is that
it utilizes project management, in which management of progress and
intellectual property of projects are implemented in a consistent manner.
Also, various new ideas are incorporated to prevent the research from
Cooperating
Kyushu Univ.
Companies
R&D R&D
Researcher Laboratory Group Group
Cooperative Council
• Planning collaborations
• Managing respective
Stimulation
collaborations Strengthening
of scientific • Evaluating results of respective R&D activities
research activities collaborations
• Handling intellectual properties
• Receiving public funds etc.
Secretariat of the
Collaboration Council
Source: Adapted from Art, Science and Technology Center for Cooperative Research
(KASTEC) website.
1. Plan
3. Cooperative Council
Nissan Chemical:
Chairman, president and board members; general
manager and several persons of the department in charge
of university-industry cooperation (Advanced Materials
and Planning Division); several persons of indirect depart-
ments, including the Intellectual Property Department;
about 30 researchers (from research laboratories, factory
development departments and so on.)
● Meetings: the Cooperative Council meeting was held a total
of eight times during the period from 2005 to September
2008 (about semi-annually).
● Main agenda: confirmation of requests from each party
and of matters to be discussed by both parties; report on
the progress of each party; presentation of the content
of research (by Kyushu University, about seven to eight
researchers at each presentation); special lectures (on the
content of research in advanced fields by researchers of
Kyushu University).
within the university and collated research themes compatible with the
topic requested by Nissan Chemical. The company was then presented
with a proposal. Nissan Chemical judged that, relative to other uni-
versities, Kyushu University’s response was the most appropriate for
their needs, and the university’s research level was the highest in the
● The university conducts joint research for the future, not for the
present. Although the university’s research has resulted in many
fields and that they must seek new profitable fields of business. Thus it has
become increasingly difficult for large companies to carry out research in
every phase of their business fields, from basic and exploratory research
to applied research and development (that is, from upstream research
through to downstream research). Under these conditions, many com-
panies are downscaling or abolishing their central research institutes that
were dedicated to basic research, and are turning to applied research and
development in fields other than their core business. Collaboration with
some external organization is considered a promising substitute for the
central research institute. In particular, there is a growing expectation of
UIC (joint/sponsored research). It may be said that we are entering an age
of open innovation.
Needless to say, collaboration with universities in applied R & D is also
common. However, for Japanese business enterprises which have strong
capabilities in applied research for the development of new products and
new businesses, expectations of universities primarily concern the univer-
sities’ superior capacity to conduct basic research and explore new fields.
This was made clear by the questionnaire survey described earlier; it has
been reconfirmed through interviews with companies that have signed an
organization-level cooperation agreement with Kyushu University.
On the other hand, there are two major concerns business enterprises
have about universities in Japan: the ability of university researchers to
manage the progress of their research; and the mismatch between the com-
pany’s needs and the researchers’ motivations. In addition, researchers in
different fields of research and in different laboratories at Japanese univer-
sities have a strong sense of independence. Under these conditions, inter-
disciplinary research can hardly be hoped for. In other words, companies
feel uneasy about whether university researchers will carry out the joint/
sponsored research within the specified period, and whether researchers
will bring about the results anticipated by the companies. Thus, compa-
nies’ uneasiness is closely connected with researchers’ abilities to manage
research progress, and with the environment in universities which is not
conducive to interdisciplinary research.
The framework of organization-level joint research of Kyushu
University is one that removes companies’ uneasiness. In fact, it is highly
rated by business enterprises that have a cooperative relationship with
the university. IMAQ coordinates the UIC to ensure that the needs of the
company are met. In addition, IMAQ – which has made various arrange-
ments to break through the barriers of conventional joint research – plays
a role in increasing companies’ satisfaction.
When it comes to assigning teachers/researchers of the university to a
particular joint research project, IMAQ makes it a rule to select those
who are interested in the need and topic proposed by the company. Thus,
IMAQ pays due attention to the interests and volition of individual teach-
ers/researchers. In addition, in the course of the project, the researchers
have an opportunity to exchange views with other researchers in different
fields. Some researchers say this is very enlightening. As a result of all this,
the company will be much more satisfied with the research and at the same
time, university researchers find that the research is meaningful to them.
As already mentioned, joint/sponsored research between companies
and universities plays the major central role in UIC in Japan. The positive
stance on the part of universities has significantly helped to promote UIC.
As a result, the level of university-industry joint research is improving each
year. Under these conditions, the organization-level cooperation devel-
oped by Kyushu University is positioned as a framework which removes
the limitations of conventional joint research and sponsored research
and which allows for a higher quality of UIC. Comprehensive coopera-
tion implemented by other universities is oriented in the same direction.
However, the organization-level joint research of Kyushu University is
evidently at an advanced new stage. It may be said that, from the stand-
point of contributing to innovation in the country (mainly in industry),
it is a highly effective and efficient framework. Thus as observed in the
example of Kyushu University, to promote UIC in an efficient and effec-
tive manner, universities in Japan have endeavored to implement various
innovative schemes. These are mainly led by an organization for UIC.
They have started to achieve excellent results.
Public agency
5.7% Unknown
3.7%
Individuals
5.7% Large
company
Other 19.8%
organization
4.0%
Government,
1.7%
SME
56.0%
N = 289
Shikoku Region
0.6%
Overseas 0.7%
Hokkaido Region
0.7% Unkown
18.5%
Chugoku
Region 1.3%
Kyushu
Chubu Region Region
1.5% 63.4%
Kinki Region
2.3%
this way it contributes to the innovation system in the Kyushu area. Thus
the university has enhanced the functions of its technological consulta-
tions and has established an organization for utilizing university resources
to meet the specific needs of consulting companies. In addition, the uni-
versity has developed a system which permits utilizing external resources,
and is making arrangements for improving its problem-solving ability to
better respond to the technological consultations that it does accept (see
Section 2.4.2).
2.5 CONCLUSION
NOTES
REFERENCES
Art, Science and Technology Center for Cooperative Research, Kyushu University
(TLO Kyushu) (2004), Bulletin ‘LINK’, 12, September.
Art, Science and Technology Center for Cooperative Research, Kyushu University
(2007), Yearbook No. 13.
Art, Science and Technology Center for Cooperative Research (KASTEC) (n.d.),
Kyushu University website: http://www.astec.kyushu-u.ac.jp/eng/html/liaison
construction.html, last accessed May 2010.
Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) (various years),
Licensing Activity Survey, Deerfield, IL, USA: AUTM. Intellectual Property
Management Center of Kyushu University, homepage.
Ijichi, T. and S. Nagaoka (2007), ‘Management of IPRs for upstream research
inventions in universities and national R&D institutes in Japan: results from the
IIR IP Survey 2006, Hitosobashi University, Institute of Innovation Research.