LAB-STT-ZZ-XX-RP-C-0010 - Flood Risk Assessment - C01 PDF

Head Office:
Becket House
1 Lambeth Palace Road
London SE1 7EU
Tel: 020 7401 0020
ORIGINATOR
STRUCTEMP LLP
Structural and Temporary Works Consulting
106 Weston Street London SE1 3QB
Tel: +44 (0) 796 0307039, e-mail: contact@structemp.co.uk
www.structemp.co.uk
DRAWING TITLE
LEIGH ACADEMY, BLACKHEATH

Flood Risk Assessment and SuDS Strategy
Name Signature Date

S4 - (RIBA 6) Suitable For
ATH 21/09/2020 NTS @ A4
Designed by Stage Approval
SCALE & FORMAT SUITABILITY CODE
Drawn by ATH 21/09/2020
Checked SDU 21/09/2020 LAB-STT-ZZ-XX-RP-C-
21/09/2020
0010
Approved SDU 21/09/2020 DATE OF 1ST ISSUE FILE NAME
LAB STT ZZ XX RP C 0010 C01

ORIGINATOR/I VOLUME/ LEVEL/
PROJECT TYPE ROLE SEQUENCE NUMBER REV
SSUER ZONE/AREA LOCATION
THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS :
Page 00- Cover Page

Page 01 - Revision
Page 02 - Flood Risk Assessment and SuDS Strategy
C01 21/09/2020 Issue for Stage 6 Approval
REV Date Revision Title
ALL REVISIONS
Status selected by BYUK Lead Approver on: 01/08/2018 11:38
d
ve
ro
Flood Risk
Assessment
and
pp
SuDS Strategy
Leigh Academy,
Old Dover Road,
Blackheath
-A
SE3 8SY
22nd June 2018
Ref: LAB-CLY-ZZ-XX-RP-C-0010
A
Prepared on Behalf of:
Bouygues UK Ltd
us
at
Clancy Consulting Limited

Queens House
123-129 Queens Road
Norwich
NR3 1PL
St
t: +44 (0)1603 305190

e: enquiries@clancy.co.uk
www.clancy.co.uk
THE RELEASE OF THIS DOCUMENT BY BOUYGUES UK SHALL ON NO ACCOUNT RELIEVE THE CONSTULTANT/SUB-CONTRACTOR FROM HIS CONTRACTUAL DUTIES
d
ve
ro
pp
-A
A
us
at
St
LAB-CLY-ZZ-XX-RP-C-0010
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
d
FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT
Leigh Academy, Old Dover Road, Blackheath SE3 8SY
ve
Report Reference: LAB-CLY-ZZ-XX-RP-C-0010
Prepared for: Bouygues UK Ltd
Prepared by: Clancy Consulting Limited
ro
19 Upper King St
Norwich
NR3 1RB
pp
Revision List
REVISION REASON FOR ISSUE DATE OF ISSUE
A Draft Issued for Comment 19th June 2018

-A
Updated Report Reference
B 22nd June 2018
and Section 4
Prepared by: Jack Cozens

Technician
for and on behalf of CLANCY CONSULTING LTD
A
Checked by: James Savage BSc. (hons) GMICE MIET

Civil/Structural Engineer
us
Approved by: Greg Scott B.Eng.(Hons), C.Eng., M.I.Struct.E

.Director
CAVEAT
at
This document has been prepared for the titled project, or named part thereof, and should not be
relied upon or used for any other project or part as the case may be, without an independent check
being made on it. Clancy Consulting shall not be liable for the consequences of using this document
other than for the purpose for which it was commissioned, and any user and any other person using
or relying on this document for such other purpose, agrees and will be such use or reliance be taken to
St
confirm this agreement to indemnify Clancy Consulting for all loss or damage resulting therefrom
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
d
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ve
1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 4
2.0 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT....................................................................................................... 6
3.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS ................................................................................................................ 7
4.0 FLOOD POTENTIAL ........................................................................................................................... 9
ro
5.0 DRAINAGE ......................................................................................................................... 14
6.0 NPPF AND LOCAL POLICY............................................................................................... 20
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................... 22
pp TABLE OF FIGURES
-A
Figure 1 - Risk of Flooding from Rivers and Seas (EA) ............................................................................. 5
Figure 2 - Site Location Plan (Google Maps)............................................................................................... 7
Figure 3 - Risk of Flooding from Surface Water (EA) ............................................................................... 10
Figure 4 – Groundwater Flood Events (SFRA) ......................................................................................... 11
Figure 5 - BREEAM Checklist for Achieving Avoidance from Flooding ................................................. 12
Figure 6 - Risk of Flooding from Reservoirs (EA) ..................................................................................... 13
A
Figure 7 - Existing Public Sewer Plan (TW) ............................................................................................... 14
APPENDICES
us
Appendix A Topographical Survey
Appendix B CCTV Survey and Thames Water Asset Plan
Appendix C Drainage Strategy and Calculations

at
St
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
1.0 INTRODUCTION
d
1.1 General
ve
1.1.1 This report has been prepared on instructions received from Bouygues UK Ltd.
1.1.2 This report relates to the proposed works at Leigh Academy, Blackheath to redevelop
the existing site to provide a new 1150 pupil secondary school with sixth form.
ro
1.1.3 This report sets out the results of a flood risk assessment required in support of the
BREEAM assessment for this development. The assessment has been carried out in
accordance with the general principals set out in National Planning Policy Framework
and Technical Guidance to the National Planning Policy Framework published in March
2012.
pp
1.1.4 This report is prepared solely for the benefit of the Client. This report may not be
assigned without prior written permission from Clancy Consulting.
1.2 Background Information
1.2.1 In 2001 the Department for Transport Local Government Regions (DTLR) published
-A
Planning Policy Guidance Note 25 (PPG25), which explains how flood risk should be
taken into consideration during the planning and development process.
PPG25 was replaced by Planning Policy Statement 25: Development and Flood Risk
published in March 2010. This latest Policy Statement has been introduced to place
more emphasis on the increased flood risk from climate change.
PPS25 specifies a sequential test which local planning authorities should apply to all
future proposed development sites. An exception test may also be applied to provide a
method of managing flood risk while still allowing necessary development to
A
occur.
1.2.2 In March 2012, the Government released National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)
aiming to make the planning system less complex and more accessible, to protect the
environment and promote sustainable growth.
us
NPPF accompanied with the Technical Guidance published also in March 2012
supersedes PPS25 although the principles set out in the new publication remain similar
in terms of the flood risk aspect.
The flood risk Practice Guide was published on-line in March 2014.
at
1.2.3 The following zones define the levels of flood risk: Zone 1: Low Probability.
This zone comprises land assessed as having a less than 1 in 1000 annual probability
of river or sea flooding in any one year. (<0.1%) Zone 2: Medium Probability
This zone comprises land assessed as having between 1 in 100 and 1 in 1000 annual
St
probability of river flooding (1%-0.1%) or between a 1 in 200 and 1 in 1000 annual

probability of sea flooding (0.5% - 0.1%) in any year.
Zone 3a: High Probability
This zone comprises land assessed as having between 1 in 100 or greater annual
4
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
probability of river flooding (>1%) or a 1 in 200 or greater annual probability of
d
flooding from the sea (>0.5%) in any year.
Zone 3b: Functional Flood Plain
This zone comprises land where water has to flow or be stored in times of flood.
ve
Strategic Flood Risk Assessments should identify this zone.
1.2.4 As part of its general obligations under the Water Resources Act 1991, The
Environment Agency has carried out surveys of its existing defences against flooding
and has published a series of nationwide 'Indicative Floodplain Maps' based upon
information from historic flood events and basic hydraulic modelling. In general terms,
these maps give a good indication of the areas likely to be affected by flooding. More
ro
recently, the Environment Agency have published the 'Flood Map' on their website
which is based on improved hydraulic modelling and detailed local data. The map
indicates Zones 2 and 3 with Flood Zone 1 being all the land falling outside the Zones
2 and 3.
pp
1.2.5 The EA Flood Map for the area of the proposed development indicates that the
development lies in or close to an area of flood risk zone 1.
Site location
-A
A
us
at
St
Figure 1 - Risk of Flooding from Rivers and Seas (EA)
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
2.0 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT
d
2.1 The report has been structured to follow the general principals set out in the
ve
Technical Guidance published in March 2012.
2.2 The methodology for this FRA has comprised a desktop study and liaison with the
Environment Agency (EA), liaison with Greenwich London Borough Council drainage team
and reference has also been made to relevant plans including plans showing the location of
local sewers.
ro
2.3 Sources of information
− Flood maps from the Environment Agency published on line (EA)
− Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Greenwich Council October 2011 (SFRA)
pp
− British Geological Survey (BGS)
− MLM Site Investigation
− Royal Greenwich Local Plan Core Strategy

-A
− Thames Water (TW)
A
us
at
St
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
3.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS
d
3.1 Location and Site Description
ve
3.1.1 The site is located as detailed as below.
OS X (Eastings) 540891
OS Y (Northings) 177172
ro
Nearest Post Code SE3 8SY
Lat (WGS84) N51:28:33 (51.475971)
Long (WGS84) E0:01:38 (0.027333)
pp
LR 51.475971, 0.027333
National Grid TQ408771 / TQ4089177172
mX 3042
mY 6672473
-A
Site location
A
us
Figure 2 - Site Location Plan (Google Maps)
3.1.2 The overall site is approximately 130m long by 130m wide (2ha) and is a brownfield
site. There is an existing building on the site, which is due to be demolished. Access
to the site is from 2 locations:
at
- Access road from Lizban Street north west of the site.
- The existing Car Park entrance from Old Dover Road to the south of the site.
St
3.1.3 The Site slopes from south to north as existing ground levels vary between
48.6mAOD in the south east corner and 46.0mAOD in the north west corner. A copy
of the Topographical Survey can be found in Appendix A.
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
3.1.4 The site is bounded by the following:
d
- North: Blackheath Rugby Football Club Ground
ve
- West: Residential Dwellings
- South: Old Dover Road
- East: Residential gardens and dwellings.
3.2 Geology
ro
3.2.1 A Geo-environmental Assessment was undertaken on this site in October 2017 by
MLM Consulting Ltd.
3.2.2 The existing ground condition is highlighted below. The primary strata below the site
pp
is Harwich Formation. The Harwich Formation encountered on this site comprises
coarse soils typically a silty, sandy fine to coarse gravel.
-A
3.2.3 Made ground was encountered on this site at depths between 0.35 and 1.40m bgl
and comprised macadam or concrete paving slab surfacing over dark brown silty
sands and gravels. In situ SPT Testing was undertaken and the results suggested the
A
made ground is generally compact. It is worth noting that the made ground may
extend to greater depths in areas of the site which have been subject to
redevelopment.
3.2.4 No Ground Water was encountered during the investigation works.
3.3 Development Proposal

us
3.3.1 The proposal is to redevelop the existing site to provide a new 1150 pupil secondary
school with sixth form.
at
St
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
4.0 FLOOD POTENTIAL
d
4.1 Development Proposal
ve
4.1.1 As the development is for an education building the NPPF classification of this
development is ‘more vulnerable’.
4.2 Potential for Flooding
ro
4.2.1 The site is located within a zone 1 area in terms of flooding from the River Thames.
4.2.2 There are, therefore, four potential sources of flooding at the site which will be
addressed in more detail in this report, i.e.
(i) From surface water overland flow off site.
pp
(ii) From high groundwater levels.
(iii) From artificial sources such as reservoirs.
(iv) From the surcharging of drains or sewers on the site.

-A
4.3 Existing Historical Flooding Information
4.3.1 We have reviewed the Royal Borough of Greenwich Local Flood Risk Management
Strategy. There are no known incidents at the development site.
4.4 Flood Risk Probabilities
(i) Flooding from Surface Water – Overland flow
4.4.1 During extreme rainfall events or due to poor drainage gully maintenance there will
A
times when gully capacity is exceeded which will lead to surface flow within the
surrounding roads. Mapping for this form of flooding is shown on the Environment
Agency web site.
us
at
St
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
Site location
d
ve
ro
pp
-A
Figure 3 - Risk of Flooding from Surface Water (EA)
4.4.2 There is predicted to be surface water flooding during extreme rainfall events in the
roads surrounding the site, but the building itself is currently shown to be free from flood
risk up to the 0.1% probability event. Site Generated surface flooding is to be dealt with
by proposed on-site drainage. The Environment Agency classifies this site as low
flood risk from surface water.
A
us
at
St
10
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
(ii) Flooding from Groundwater
d
4.4.3 The geological sheet for this area indicates that there are no superficial deposits
recorded. The bedrock geology consists of a Harwich Formation which consists of sand
ve
and gravel.
Site location
ro
pp
-A
Figure 4 – Groundwater Flood Events (SFRA)
4.4.4 Using figure 4 above, it is shown that the site is within an area that has not been subject
A
to groundwater flooding. This figure is not accurate enough to determine the risk.
4.4.5 Viewing the local borehole logs on the BGS website, it states that no ground water
was encountered during the drilling of a 10m deep borehole approximately 250m
away from the site.
us
4.4.6 Further to the above desk study, a site investigation was completed by MLM Group.
This also discovered that there was no ground water encountered during drilling up to
depths of 20m. The site is classed as low flood risk from ground water flooding.
at
St
11
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
d
ve
ro
pp
-A
A
Figure 5 - BREEAM Checklist for Achieving Avoidance from Flooding
4.4.7 Based upon the desk study evidence above, the risk of flooding due to ground water
can be considered low for this proposed development.
us
at
St
12
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
d
(iii) Flooding from Artificial Sources - Reservoirs
4.4.8 Artificial sources of flooding are potentially from man-made structures and
ve
infrastructure. The Environment Agency have modelled the potential effect of
flooding from failures in retaining structures containing reservoirs.
4.4.9 It should be noted that reservoir flooding is extremely unlikely to happen. There has
been no loss of life in the UK from reservoir flooding since 1925. All large reservoirs
are inspected and supervised by reservoir panel engineers. As the enforcement
ro
authority for the Reservoirs Act 1975 in England, the Environment Agency ensure that
reservoirs are inspected regularly, and essential safety work is carried out. The risk
of flooding from reservoirs at this site is extremely low.
Site location
pp
-A
A
Figure 6 - Risk of Flooding from Reservoirs (EA)

us
(iv) Flooding from Drainage on site
4.4.10 Flooding could occur if the on-site drainage system becomes blocked of the rainfall
event exceeds the design capacity. Details of the drainage system are discussed in
Chapter 5.
at
St
13
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
5.0 DRAINAGE
d
5.1 Existing Drainage
ve
5.1.1 The Thames Water drainage mapping shows that there are public drainage systems
within and surrounding the site. The blue dashed line on the plan indicates that this
local drainage system is for surface water, the red dot dash line is a foul water sewer,
and the solid red line is a combined foul and surface sewer. The full plan can be seen
in Appendix B.
ro
pp
-A
A
Figure 7 - Existing Public Sewer Plan (TW)
5.1.2 A CCTV Survey has been conducted on site and the following assessments were
made:
us
- Drainage from the sport stand to the north of the site is collected via a gravity
system and discharges into the local Thames Water sewer which coincides with
the blue line running along the north of the site. Refer to Appendix B for the CCTV
Survey Report and Plan Layout.
- A combined drainage pipe was found running south from the existing car park
at
towards Old Dover Road. This system discharges into the existing Thames Water
Foul sewer, which appears to be MH 9101B which can be seen on the Asset
Plan.
5.1.3 The existing surface and foul water drainage is collected on site into a below ground
St
piped system and discharged to the Thames Water system.
14
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
5.2 Proposed Drainage
d
5.2.1 The London Plan – Policy 5.13 Sustainable Drainage
ve
ro
pp
-A
5.2.2 Surface Water Disposal Hierarchy
The disposal of surface water should be considered in the following order of priority;
1. Infiltration into the subsoil via soakaways or permeable paving.
2. Discharge to a water course or the sea.

A
3. Discharge to a surface water sewer.
4. Discharge to a combined sewer.
If it is not possible to discharge to a soakaway, then surface water should be

controlled with the use of Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) and considered
us
using the SuDS Hierarchy.

at
St
15
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
d
5.2.3 SuDS Hierarchy
ve
ro
pp
-A
5.2.4 Disposal of Surface Water
Infiltration
From the BGS mapping and ground investigations, soakaways would be viable within
the Harwich Formation Strata found onsite. An infiltration rate of 10x10-6 is assumed
at this stage which was taken from the original FRA which was completed in
November 2017 by HSP Consulting Engineers Ltd.
A
While infiltration is likely to be possible, there are also other constraints that need to
be considered;
Ground contamination and made ground – Due to the presence of made ground on
site, these soils may be an indicator of the potential presence of contaminants,
particularly charcoal fragments which could contain hydrocarbons.
us
Space on the site – traditional soakaways should be located at least 5m from

proposed structures. Care must be taken with regards to the coordination with the
landscape plan as soakaways are not to be placed under areas trees are proposed.
Water Couse
at
There are no watercourses within practical distance of the site and this would entail
crossing third party land.
Surface water Sewer

St
The CCTV and Thames Water Asset plan highlights that the existing site drains to the
local Thames Water sewer system.
16
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
d
5.2.5 SuDS Strategy
ve
Control at Source.
One of the most effective means of reducing surface water flows and run-off is to
control the rainfall at source with the use of increased soft landscaping, green roofs,
permeable paving.
Permeable paving will be possible for this site. Permeable paving can be used to filter
ro
and improve water quality as well as provide a storage reservoir for storm water
during extreme rainfall events. A type A infiltration permeable paving system will be
constructed in the demonstration area north west of the building in accordance with
the Interpave Guide to the Design, Construction and Maintenance of Concrete Block
pp
Permeable Pavements, Edition 6.
The proposed development will not be increasing the impermeable area, so any
SuDS measures will contribute to improvements in local flood risk in accordance with
local policy.
5.2.6 Any new drainage should be designed in accordance with the building regulations to
-A
allow for easy access for maintenance and blockage clearance.
5.2.7 It is usual practice for all paving to slope away from the building as any surface water
which is unable to enter the below ground system will then collect on site within
paved or landscaped areas.
5.3 Drainage Strategy
5.3.1 Existing and Proposed Areas

A
us
at
St
Figure 8 – Existing Areas Plan (Clancy Consulting Ltd)
17
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
d
ve
Existing Levels Sketch (Clancy Consulting Ltd)
ro
pp
-A
Figure 9 – Proposed Area Plan (Clancy Consulting Ltd)

A
Refer to calculations and areas shown on CCL Sketches 01 & 02 shown in Appendix
C.
Existing Site
us
Total Site Area = 20,000m2 (2.0ha) Approx.

Total Impermeable Area = 16,700m2 (1.67ha)
Total Permeable Area = 3,300m2 (0.33ha)
Percentage Impermeable = 84%
Proposed Site
at
Total Site Area = 16,000m2 (1.6ha) Approx.

Total Impermeable Area = 11,000m2 (1.1ha)
Total Permeable Area = 5,000m2 (0.5ha)
Percentage Impermeable = 69%
St
18
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
d
5.3.2 Surface Water Design Strategy
As described previously in this report the method of discharge for surface water on this
ve
site will be via infiltration. Surface water will be collected via pipes and inspection
chambers via gravity and discharge into several soakaways spread across the site.
Calculations along with the design strategy drawings can be seen in Appendix C.
Landscaped Areas – to be drained via infiltration in to the newly formed areas.
Main Buildings Roof/Car Park and Paths Run Off – This will be collected and discharged
ro
via infiltration using geo-cellular soakaways at 0.8m deep.
The required soakaway volume has been estimated by Tedds for all storm events up to
and including the 1 in 100 year plus 40% climate change. An assumed infiltration rate
of 10x10-6 has been used. Further testing will be required to determine the actual figure.
pp
The estimated soakaway sizes at a 1 in 100 year plus 40% climate change storm event
and using the assumed infiltration rate can be seen below. Please refer to Appendix C
for calculations. Refer to CCL Drainage Drawing 4401 and 4402 for soakaway locations.
-A
A
us
at
St
19
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
6.0 NPPF AND LOCAL POLICY
d
6.1 Planning Policy Requirements
ve
The proposal site has been classified as being within Flood Zone 1.
NPPF considers residential development as “more vulnerable” development in

respect of flood risk.
The NPPF (Technical Guide) Table 3, Flood Risk Vulnerability and Flood Zone
ro
Compatibility matrix indicates that “more vulnerable” development proposals in Flood
Zone 1 are appropriate.
pp
6.2 Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy – Polices E2 and E3
-A
A
us
at
St
20
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
d
6.3 Exception test
ve
The site is in an area of flood zone 1, therefore no exception test is required.
6.4 Residual Risks, Flood Mitigation, Resistance and Resilience of Proposed

Building
6.4.1 The site has been shown to be at low to very low risk from all forms of flooding.
ro
6.4.2 The residual risk will be from failure of drainage systems on site. A detailed
maintenance strategy and regime should be developed during the detailed design
stage.
pp
-A
A
us
at
St
21
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
d
7.1 This report gives details of the flood risk assessment, which has been carried out in
ve
relation to the proposed redevelopment at Leigh Academy.
7.2 The site is in flood zone 1. The development is at low risk from all sources of flooding.
7.3 To ensure the low probability of flooding from groundwater potential is maintained,
suitable water proofing has been specified by the architect.
ro
7.4 The development will not significantly impact on the discharges to the drainage system.
Surface water flow will be reduced with the use of sustainable drainage systems.
7.5 Surface Water will be discharged via infiltration into the ground using soakaways.
Soakaways have been designed for all storm events up to and including the 1 in 100
pp
year plus 40% climate change.
7.6 The residual risks associated with any event in excess of that modelled will be managed
to direct water away from the building.
-A
A
us
at
St
22
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
d
ve
ro
APPENDIX A
pp Topographical Survey
-A
A
us
at
St
23
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
d
ve
ro
APPENDIX A
pp Topographical Survey
-A
A
us
at
St
23
e d
o v
p r
Ap
-
A
u s
a t
S t
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
d
ve
ro
pp
-A
APPENDIX B
Existing Information
CCTV Survey Drawing
Thames Water Asset Plan

A
us
at
St
24
Utilities may continue outside of the survey area. Any paint marks outside of the area are for
investigative purposes only and may not represent the full extent of the sub-surface utilities.
Only sub-surface utility information is provided. Above ground utility information may be shown
where it assists with positional referencing.
Where logic indicates a utility exists but which cannot be positively confirmed with the
technology, an assumed route (AR) is recorded.
N
ClearView Surveys does not procure statutory or private source utility information (Unless
INDICATIVE
requested at time of order) as part of its detection service nor does it record any such
information in a utility survey unless otherwise requested. Statutory plans should be consulted
d
to supplement this survey.
Vertical & Horizontal Position - Vertical position (depth) is indicative to the top of the
utility/feature and is recorded as DTS (depth to top of service) and should not be taken as
exact. Where depth information from the technology is unclear, depth is not shown. Drains
may have been detected using threading and the depth indicated could be between the top
and the bottom of the drain. Horizontal position is indicative to the centre of the utility/feature
and should not be taken as exact.
Warranty - Biodegradable paints are used to mark-out the position of the utilities. Before long
paint markings may become illegible depending on ground, weather and traffic conditions. No
warranty is given in respect of the durability of the paint markings and that they are a complete
representation of the sub-surface utilities therefore this drawing should be used as the primary
reference for the survey results.
This drawing does not provide an absolute representation of the sub-surface. Utilities have
been detected using non-invasive technologies only and the performance can be adversely
affected by ground, weather and site conditions outside of ClearView Surveys control therefore
some utilities may be undetectable. While ClearView Surveys uses reasonable endeavours to
detect all utilities, it does not warrant that 100% detection will be achieved and that
approximate depth penetration of the technologies will be greater than two metres.
e
Sewer and manhole details shown on this drawing have been obtained by observation and
measurement from the surface and as such cannot be guaranteed. Where precise sewer
details will be critical to the project design ClearView Surveys would recommend that entry into
the chamber be undertaken using a specialist team, appropriately qualified for confined space
entry. These teams can be supplied on request.
Irrespective of the information provided by a utility survey and statutory plans,

excavation work should be undertaken with extreme caution and in accordance with
HSE Guidelines - HSG47 Avoiding Danger from Underground Services
v
36
1. The correct identification of the utility types can not be 100% guaranteed,
therefore these should be independently verified prior to use in any design
or building works.
2. All pipe diameters and levels are assumed to be correct, but due to non
entry of the inspection chambers, these should be verified before any
works commence.
3. All utility depths are in metres.
4. All pipe/duct sizes are in millimeters.
5. Information provided should not be altered. It should not be used for any
purpose other than for which it was intended and should not be issued to
other parties without prior agreement of ClearView Surveys.
6. All dimensions should be checked on site before any
fabrication,construction or excavation.
7. CCTV Drainage Pipe positions are indicative only and are in an
o
approximate position.
8. Base Topo Supplied By Client. Accuracy of this cannot be guaranteed as
it was not undertaken by ClearView Surveys.
r
STREET FURNITURE LEVELS & DEPTHS INSPECTION CHAMBERS
BB Belisha Beacon A Approximate AC Access Cover
BL Basement Light BD Back Drop Depth BH Borehole
Bin Litter Bin BDL Back Drop Level CDC Concrete Drainage Channel
BO Bollard CD Chamber Depth EIC Electric Inspection Cover
MH.B BS Bus Stop CL Cover Level ER Earth Rod
CPO Concrete Post DPC Damp Proof Course FWIC Foul Water Inspection Cover
CL=45.75 EC Electric Cupboard EL Eaves Level FWPS Foul Water Pumping Station
IL=43.85 EFP Electric Feeder Pillar FFL Finished Floor Level FH Fire Hydrant
EP Electric Pole FRL Flat Roof Level GIC Gas Inspection Cover
>COMB> >COMB> 250Ø FB Flower Bed IBDL Internal Back Drop GM Gas Meter
ID Invert Depth
MH.C >COMB> >COMB> >COMB> >COMB> FHM Fire Hydrant Marker
IL Invert Level
GV Gas Valve
FL Flood Light G Gully
25
ID=3.12d MH.B Drops Into Run >COMB> >COMB> >COMB> >COMB>
FP Flag Pole OD Outlet Depth IC Inspection Cover
0
(MH Position Serving Upstream
>COMB> OL Outlet Level
Ø
>COMB> FPO Fence Post KI Kerb Inlet
p
>COMB> >COMB>
PWL Parapet Wall Level
Approximate) >COMB> JB Junction Box
RL Ridge Level
LHP London Hydraulic Power
GB Grit Box MDC Metal Drainage Channel
250Ø S/A Due To GMK Gas Marker Post SD Sump Depth MW Monitoring Well
SFD Soffit Depth
B>
GPO Gate Post NFI No Further Information
Encrustation IBO Illuminated Bollard SFL Soffit Level RE Rodding Eye
OM
LH Lamp Hole SiltL Silt Level SDIC Service Duct Inspection Cover
SL Sump Level
Unsure What LP Lamp Post SV Stop Valve
C
SSL Structural Slab Level
>
LPO Lockable Post SWCP Surface Water Catch Pit
Main Sewer Upstream Serves MK Marker TFL Top Of Fence Level SWIC Surface Water Inspection Cover
Reached Possibly Redundant. MPO Metal Post THL Threshold Level SWSA Surface Water Soakaway
NP TWL Top Of Wall Level TCIC Traffic Control Inspection Cover
Jetting Required To PB
Name Plate
Post Box WL Water Level TIC Telecom Inspection Cover
Prove.
B>
PM Parking Meter UIC Unidentified Inspection Cover
FENCES & WALLS
OM
RPO Reflector Post UTR Unable To Raise
RS Road Sign BW Block Wall WIC Water Inspection Cover
>C
SI Sign BRP Brick Pier WM Water Meter
STN Survey Station BRTW Brick Retaining Wall WWO Water Wash Out
Tap Attached to Wall/Building etc BRW Brick Wall WSV Water Stop Valve
TCB Telephone Call Box BWF Barbed Wire Fence
TL Traffic Light CBF Close Board Fence
p
TL
TLCB Traffic Light Control Box CIF Corrugated Iron Fence SURFACES
B>
TP Telegraph Pole CLF Chain Link Fence BPav Brick Paving
OM
TPO Timber Post CPF Chestnut Paling Fence Conc Concrete
CRW Concrete Retaining Wall CPav Crazy Paving
C
PIPES & CABLES CW Concrete Wall CPS Concrete Paving Slabs
>
DBC Directly Buried Cable CWF Chicken Wire Fence FB Flower / Shrub Border
DP Down Pipe DIL Dilapidated KFC Kidney Flint Cobbles
eot End Of Trace HR Hand Rail T Tiles
FWP Foul Water Pipe IWF Interwoven Fence Tmac Tarmac
B>
GP Gas Pipe LF Lattice Fence TPav Tactile Paving
ONV Outlet Not Visible MF Miscellaneous Fence TS Trench Scar
OM
RWP Rain Water Pipe MRF Metal Railing Fence
SP Stand Pipe
C
OBF Open Board Fence
>
SVP Soil Vent Pipe PCF Post & Chain Fence MEASUREMENTS
UTT Unable To Trace PNF Panel Fence d Depth (m)
VP Vent Pipe PRF Post & Rail Fence Ø Diameter (mm)
WP Waste Pipe PWF Post & Wire Fence Ext.Ø External Diameter (mm)
RTW Retaining Wall H Object Height (m)
>
MB
STW Stone Wall
SRTW Stone Retaining Wall
O
WMF Wire Mesh Fence
>C
A
B>
OM
>C
UTILITY KEY
$ Service Traced On Site

$ Route Assumed
$ (R) Record Information
E Electric
ELV Electric (LV)
S/A Due To Obstruction/ EHV Electric (HV)
T BT
Debris/Soil Waste C Communications
W Water
C
G Gas
O Oil
H Heating
e s
A Air
a c
V Vent
rr
DR > Drainage
Te
SW > Storm Drainage
FW > Foul Drainage
CW > Combined Drainage
-
U Unidentified
EC Earthing Cable
TS Traffic Signal
GA
C
Gauge Line
OF Offset Fill
FO Fibre Optic
F Fuel Line
VR Vapour Recovery
GPR Linear Radar Feature
C
A
Gully
SW
C
Branch 1 )
SW (R
Serves Gully
)
SW (R
SW (R)
FW (R)
SW (R) MH
C
CL=46.63 FW (R)
SW
MH SW (R) )
CL=46.45 FW (R
SW (R)
)
(R
S/A Due To Bend/Silt/
SW
Camera Starting To Flip S/A Due To
When Attempting To Go Heavy Debris
C
s
Around Bend
Foul From Private
150Ø
Br-1
House Dropping Into
FW (R)
)
(R
MH.FW2
SW
>COMB
> 250Ø Br-2
>
Ø >SW
100
>COMB
C
> 100Ø
B> MH.A FW (R
>
M >SW
>CO CL=46.37 )
IL=44.57 > FW (R MH
B>
>SW ) MH
M CL=46.45
>CO Gully FW (R
)
CL=46.49
MH.FW2 > FW (R) FW (R) FW (R) Rev Date Notes By
MB FW (R)
CL=46.49
>CO Gully
C
1 13/06/18 Record Information Added From Client DWG DG
IL=45.41
u
Reached
>
Ø MB
MH.FW2 100 >CO
Serving Squash MH
FW (R)
Centre And CL=46.38
Private House MH
FW
CL=46.62
FW (R)
(R)
t
MH
CL=46.60
FW (R)
FW
1
(R)
FW (R)
FW
(R)
FW (R)
a
FW
(R)
FW (R)
t
FW (R)
FW (R)
MH
CL=46.99
MH
CL=47.00 FW (R)
FW (R)
FW (R)
FW (R) FW (R)
S
MH CLIENT
CL=46.48
Bouygues
FW (R)
SITE
(R)
Leigh Academy
SW
Old Dover Road, Blackheath
FW (R)
London, SE3 8SY
FW
DRAWING TITLE
(R)
SW (
CCTV Drainage Survey

PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATE
R)
(R)
10995 10995-F May 2018

SW
SURVEYED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

GK DG AG
FW (R)
SCALE SHEET SIZE SHEET
1:100 A0 1 OF 5
SW (
(R)
R)
SW
SW (
FW (R)
(R)
R)
SW
UNIT 301, OLD BARN FARM ROAD

WOOLSBRIDGE INDUSTRIAL PARK
THREE LEGGED CROSS, WIMBORNE, BH21 6SP
T 01202 828281
F 01202 824777
SW
(R)
E info@clearviewsurveys.co.uk
SW
W www.clearviewsurveys.co.uk
N
INDICATIVE
d
e

v
or building works.
works commence.
o
r
BS Bus Stop CL Cover Level ER Earth Rod
EC Electric Cupboard EL Eaves Level FWPS Foul Water Pumping Station
EFP Electric Feeder Pillar FFL Finished Floor Level FH Fire Hydrant
FB Flower Bed IBDL Internal Back Drop GM Gas Meter
FHM Fire Hydrant Marker ID Invert Depth GV Gas Valve
FL Flood Light IL Invert Level G Gully
FPO Fence Post OL Outlet Level KI Kerb Inlet
p
JB Junction Box PWL Parapet Wall Level LHP London Hydraulic Power
GB Grit Box RL Ridge Level MDC Metal Drainage Channel
GMK Gas Marker Post SD Sump Depth MW Monitoring Well
GPO Gate Post SFD Soffit Depth NFI No Further Information
IBO Illuminated Bollard SFL Soffit Level RE Rodding Eye
LP Lamp Post SL Sump Level SV Stop Valve
LPO Lockable Post SSL Structural Slab Level SWCP Surface Water Catch Pit
MK Marker TFL Top Of Fence Level SWIC Surface Water Inspection Cover
MPO Metal Post THL Threshold Level SWSA Surface Water Soakaway
NP Name Plate TWL Top Of Wall Level TCIC Traffic Control Inspection Cover
PB Post Box WL Water Level TIC Telecom Inspection Cover
RPO Reflector Post FENCES & WALLS UTR Unable To Raise
p
TL
CPF Chestnut Paling Fence Conc Concrete
s
TPO Timber Post
e
ra c
Ter
SP Stand Pipe OBF Open Board Fence
STW Stone Wall
WMF Wire Mesh Fence
A
UTILITY KEY

$ Route Assumed
E Electric
ELV Electric (LV)
EHV Electric (HV)
T BT
C Communications
W Water
G Gas
O Oil
H Heating
A
Stand
Air
V Vent
DR > Drainage
SW > Storm Drainage
FW > Foul Drainage
-
U Unidentified
Base of Stack Reached EC

TS
Earthing Cable
Traffic Signal
GA Gauge Line
OF Offset Fill
FO Fibre Optic
F Fuel Line
VR Vapour Recovery
RWP Serving Stand
Base of Stack Reached
>SW
>
>SW>
Ø
>SW>
00
>S
RWP From Stand >SW>

1
W>
RWP Assumed Dropping Into

-1
>SW>
Br
Drops Into MH.SW.3 MH.SW.2 >SW>

>SW>
>SW>
150Ø
SW (R)
MH.SW2
SW (R) CL=47.36
MH
SW (R) IL=45.66
CL=47.45
)
SW (R)
(R
SW (R)
SW
FW (R)
A
FW (R) SW
SW (R) FW (R)
MH.SW4 Lifted, SW Asked By Client To
No Branches In MH. SW (R) MH.SW3 FW (R) SW
MH
Lift While Onsite To
FW (R) CL=47.73
SW (R) UTR (Seized)
FW (R) See If Serving
SW
SW (R) FW (R) Houses Upstream
FW
FW (R)
FW
) FW (R) Of MH
SW (R FW (R)
(R)
(R)
FW (R)
FW (R)
FW (R)
FW (R)
FW (R)
SW
s
SW
SW
Rev Date Notes By
u
SW
t
SW
2
a SW
FW
(R)
FW
(R
)
t SW
FW
(R)
FW
(R)
MH
CL=46.99
SW
FW
(R)
FW
(R)
S
CLIENT
SW
FW Bouygues
(R
)
FW SITE
(R)
Leigh Academy
SW
London, SE3 8SY
FW
(R) DRAWING TITLE
FW 10995 10995-F May 2018
(R
)
MH GK DG AG
CL=47.37
FW SCALE SHEET SIZE SHEET
(R
) 1:100 A0 2 OF 5
FW
(R
)
FW MH
(R)
CL=47.01
FW (R)
(R) UNIT 301, OLD BARN FARM ROAD

FW FW WOOLSBRIDGE INDUSTRIAL PARK
(R THREE LEGGED CROSS, WIMBORNE, BH21 6SP
)
(R) T 01202 828281
FW
MH F 01202 824777
CL=46.99 FW
SW (
(R)
R)
SW
N
INDICATIVE
SW (
d
(R)
SW
R)
(R)
SW (
SW
R)
e
MH Steel Plate entry. These teams can be supplied on request.
SW (R)
CL=46.76 Irrespective of the information provided by a utility survey and statutory plans,
SW (R)
v
or building works.
MH entry of the inspection chambers, these should be verified before any
CL=47.02 works commence.
SW (R)
o
SW (R)
SW
(R
)
r
SW (R)
SW (R)
SW
(R
)
SW (R)
IL Invert Level
SW
FL Flood Light G Gully
SW (R)
(R
p
)
(R
SW
SiltL Silt Level
SW
LH Lamp Hole SDIC Service Duct Inspection Cover
(R
MH
)
SW
MPO Metal Post THL Threshold Level SWSA Surface Water Soakaway
CL=46.83 NP Name Plate TWL Top Of Wall Level TCIC Traffic Control Inspection Cover
(R
WL Water Level TIC Telecom Inspection Cover
SW (R)
PB Post Box
)
BW Block Wall WIC Water Inspection Cover
SW
RS Road Sign
(R
)
SW (R)
SW (R)
TL
MH TPO Timber Post CPF Chestnut Paling Fence Conc Concrete
CL=46.93 CRW Concrete Retaining Wall CPav Crazy Paving
SW (R)
SW (R)
SW (R)
STW Stone Wall
WMF Wire Mesh Fence
SW (R)
SW (R)
UTILITY KEY

$ Route Assumed
E Electric
ELV Electric (LV)
EHV Electric (HV)
T BT
C Communications
SW (R)
W Water
G Gas
O Oil
H Heating
A Air
V Vent
SW (R)
DR > Drainage
SW > Storm Drainage
FW > Foul Drainage
-
U Unidentified
EC Earthing Cable
TS Traffic Signal
GA Gauge Line
OF Offset Fill
FO Fibre Optic
F Fuel Line
SW (R)
VR Vapour Recovery
SW (R)
SW (R)
SW (R)
SW (R)
A SW (R)
SW (R)
SW (R)
FW (R)
SW (R)
MH
CL=46.77
s (R)
SW
SW
(R
FW (R)
(R)
)
SW
SW (R)
(R) SW (R)
SW
(R) )
SW (R) SW (R MH Position
SW R) Approximate
SW (
MH
CL=46.92 SW (R) SW (R)
Rev Date Notes By
FW (R)
SW (
FW
R) 1 13/06/18 Record Information Added From Client DWG DG
SW (R)
u
SW (R)
FW (R)
SW (R)
SW (R)
MH
CL=46.95
FW (R)
SW (R)
SW (R)
SW (R)
a
MH.FW1
3
CL=46.93
IL=45.13
Branch 1 Gully
FW (R)
Serving Open Ø
100
SW (R)
Ground Br-1SW>
>
t
Gully Reached
SW (R)
MH
FW (R)
CL=47.00
SW (R)
MH FW (R)
FW (R)
CL=47.04 FW (R)
SW (R)
SW (R)
S
CLIENT
FW
MH (R
CL=46.98
) Bouygues
SW (R) MH
CL=46.90 FW
SW (R) (R SITE
SW (R) )
SW (R)
Leigh Academy
SW Old Dover Road, Blackheath
(R)
London, SE3 8SY
Area Needs Jetting And FW
SW (R
(R) )
Survey When Returning SW MH DRAWING TITLE
(R CL=46.93
To Jet And Survey Main SW
(R)
) PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATE
FW 10995 10995-F May 2018
225Ø Run SW (R
SW (R)
(R) ) SURVEYED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
MH GK DG AG
CL=47.05
FW 1:100 A0 3 OF 5
(R
)
FW
(R
)
MH.D
225Ø
CL=47.15
IL=44.19
MH
>COM
CL=47.12
B>
T 01202 828281
F 01202 824777
CL=46.99 FW
(R
) Utilities may continue outside of the survey area. Any paint marks outside of the area are for
MH FW (R)
CL=47.00 FW (R) MH Only sub-surface utility information is provided. Above ground utility information may be shown
FW (R)
MH CL=46.94
CL=47.02 FW (R)
FW technology, an assumed route (AR) is recorded.
FW (R) (R
N
)
INDICATIVE
d
FW Vertical & Horizontal Position - Vertical position (depth) is indicative to the top of the
(R
) exact. Where depth information from the technology is unclear, depth is not shown. Drains
SW
(R)
FW Warranty - Biodegradable paints are used to mark-out the position of the utilities. Before long
(R
) warranty is given in respect of the durability of the paint markings and that they are a complete
MH representation of the sub-surface utilities therefore this drawing should be used as the primary
CL=
FW been detected using non-invasive technologies only and the performance can be adversely
(R
) some utilities may be undetectable. While ClearView Surveys uses reasonable endeavours to
SW
e
(R)
FW measurement from the surface and as such cannot be guaranteed. Where precise sewer
(R
) the chamber be undertaken using a specialist team, appropriately qualified for confined space
MH entry. These teams can be supplied on request.
CL=47.24 Irrespective of the information provided by a utility survey and statutory plans,
SW
(R)
(R)
SW
v
FW (R)
(R)
MH 1. The correct identification of the utility types can not be 100% guaranteed,
SW
CL=47.20 therefore these should be independently verified prior to use in any design
or building works.
works commence.
(R)
SW
o
FW (R)
(R)
SW
r
FW (R)
(R)
SW
FW (R)
OD Outlet Depth
(R)
FP Flag Pole IC Inspection Cover
p
PWL Parapet Wall Level
SW
JB Junction Box LHP London Hydraulic Power
MH GB Grit Box RL Ridge Level MDC Metal Drainage Channel
SW (R) CL=47.01 GMK Gas Marker Post SD
SFD
Sump Depth
Soffit Depth
MW Monitoring Well
SW (R)
GPO Gate Post NFI No Further Information
(R)
FW (R) IBO Illuminated Bollard SFL Soffit Level RE Rodding Eye
SW (R) FW (R) LH Lamp Hole SiltL Silt Level SDIC Service Duct Inspection Cover
SW
MH SL Sump Level
SW (R) FW (R)
LP Lamp Post SV Stop Valve
FW (R)
MH CL=47.27 LPO Lockable Post SSL Structural Slab Level SWCP Surface Water Catch Pit
CL=47.31 FW (R) MK Marker TFL Top Of Fence Level SWIC Surface Water Inspection Cover
FW (R) MPO Metal Post THL Threshold Level SWSA Surface Water Soakaway
(R)
NP TWL Top Of Wall Level TCIC Traffic Control Inspection Cover
FW (R)
Name Plate
SW (R)
FW (R)
SW
MH PM Parking Meter UIC Unidentified Inspection Cover
MH CL=47.20 MH RPO Reflector Post FENCES & WALLS UTR Unable To Raise
FW (R) BW Block Wall
MH CL=47.04 CL=46.51 RS Road Sign WIC Water Inspection Cover
)
SW (R
CL=47.00 STN Survey Station BRTW Brick Retaining Wall WWO Water Wash Out
p
TL
STW Stone Wall
WMF Wire Mesh Fence
A
UTILITY KEY

$ Route Assumed
E Electric
ELV Electric (LV)
EHV Electric (HV)
T BT
C Communications
W Water
G Gas
O Oil
H Heating
A Air
V Vent
DR > Drainage
SW > Storm Drainage
FW > Foul Drainage
-
U Unidentified
EC Earthing Cable
TS Traffic Signal
GA Gauge Line
OF Offset Fill
FO Fibre Optic
F Fuel Line
VR Vapour Recovery
MH
CL=46.59
MH
CL=47.01
SW (R)
A
SW (R)
FW (R)
SW (R)
FW (R)
MH
CL=47.02
s
FW (R)
FW
FW (R)
SW(R(R)
MH FW (R)
FW (R)
)
CL=47.03
FW (R)
FW (R)
Rev Date Notes By

u
FW (R)
t
FW (R)
FW (R)
a
4
t
FW (R)
MH
MH CL=47.04
CL=47.08
FW (R)
MH
S
CL=47.02
CLIENT
Bouygues
)
(R SITE
FW
Leigh Academy
London, SE3 8SY
)
(R
FW
DRAWING TITLE
10995 10995-F May 2018
)
(R SURVEYED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
FW GK DG AG
1:100 A0 4 OF 5
)
(R
FW MH
CL=47.12

T 01202 828281
F 01202 824777
>COMB
>
N
INDICATIVE
>COMB
d
>
MH
CL=47.65 paint markings may become illegible depending on ground, weather and traffic conditions. No
>COM
B>
>COM
B>

>COM
B>
v
>COM
B>
or building works.
works commence.
>COM
B>
o
>COM
B>
>COM
r
B>
>
COMB
>
OL Outlet Level
>COMB
FPO Fence Post KI Kerb Inlet
p
>
THL Threshold Level
>COMB
MPO Metal Post SWSA Surface Water Soakaway
NP Name Plate TWL Top Of Wall Level TCIC Traffic Control Inspection Cover
>
>COMB
p
TL
>
>COM
B>
125
STW Stone Wall
>COM
WMF Wire Mesh Fence
B>
A
129
>COM
UTILITY KEY
B>
$ Route Assumed
E Electric
ELV Electric (LV)
EHV Electric (HV)
T BT
C Communications
W Water
>COM
G Gas
O Oil
H Heating
A Air
V Vent
B>
DR > Drainage
SW > Storm Drainage
FW > Foul Drainage
-
U Unidentified
131
EC Earthing Cable
TS Traffic Signal
GA Gauge Line
>COM
OF Offset Fill
FO Fibre Optic
F Fuel Line
VR Vapour Recovery
B>
MH
CL=47.91
>COM
B>
225Ø
MH.E
141
225Ø
ID=3.26d
(MH Position
>COM
Approximate)
B>
A
>COM
B>
>COM
B>
>COM
s
B>
Main Sewer Reached
Rev Date Notes By

tu
ta
5
S
CLIENT
Bouygues
SITE
Leigh Academy
London, SE3 8SY
DRAWING TITLE
10995 10995-F May 2018
GK DG AG
1:100 A0 5 OF 5

T 01202 828281
F 01202 824777
Asset Location Search! Sewer Map - ALS/ALS Standard/2017_3634380 ! 1503

Tennis Courts
! ! !
! Tennis Courts 1 ! 30 5 FAIRL AW
N % Ps
!
! ! %52
22 9
=
.
%
47
0501
48
% Po sts 229
49
%
! !
!
300
300 375 ! ! !
!
44
! !
45
Tennis Courts
100
7403 ! ! ! ! !
2
41
Icough
7404
! !
%
!
1 to 3
4
!
!
1 to 12
6403A 741A !
! !
117 to 13
! !
! ! !
Co u rt
d
5
1 to 20
!
1
Club
12 5 to 13
! !
22 9
! ! !
22 9
!
30 0
! !
6
!
37 5
31
%
! ! ! Play Area
32
33
30 5
! ! !
HASS
6
CO UT
!
5
"
30 0
! !
%
El ! !
FURZ
E ND
12a
ta
H
Su b S !
29
! ! !
28
! !
URS T
! !
! ! ! ! 1
E AN
! !
12 4a
EFIE
! ! !
21 to 40
21
97 to 11 6
!.
22
ve
23
! ! !
ROAD
8401A 1401
ROA
!
LD
.
7402 ! !
!
10
! 44.0m = ! !
ROAD
741B !
D
2
13 to 28
7401 !
15
! !
150
! ! ! ! 0401 !
19
! ! Childrens !
10 9 to 12
!
13
! Nursery ! ! ! !
12
11
225
Rectory Field !
13
12
14
!
300
! !
15 0
!! (Cricket, Football and Tennis Ground) ! !

30 0
! !
22 5
%
22 9
%
35 3
4 !
22 9
9 7a
30 0
! ! Sports Court
%
18
%
Fairlawn Court
Pavilion
2
!
7
Blaker Court
St Jo
!
2
!
4
30 5
!
1
!
hn's
%
2
8301B
44.2m 33
OAD
R!
1
Hall
EN
29 to 44
LYVE D 27 ! ! !
1
7306 ! ! ! !
! 20
! !
!
93 to 10
7305 14 ! !
ro
osts ! !
23
"
7 ! ! !
1301
Byron Terra
22 5 ! ! ! ! 1302
1
"
225 =
8
!
41 to 60
77 to 96
!
731A
! ! 36 0301 ! ! !
! ! !
15 0
31
44 a
"
"
!
26 !
RE CTOR
ce
! !
21 ! ! ! ! ! !
26
30 0 10 0 ! !
92 a
16 ! CW
! es
!! ! ! ! 9 11
% Terrac Un d
!
! !
!! 30 0 T 8302 831B
! ! ! ! !
Y FIEL D
S TRE E ! Mast (Telecommunication) ! Play Area
!
44
LIZBAN s
Terra ce Stand !
FW
35
15 0
Po sts
2
22
7302A 831C ! ! !
%
45.0m
45 to 56
! 7304 ! !
22 9
!
5
7303 ! !
46
! ! ! ! FW !
%
61 to 80
44.4m % 15 0
!
! ! ! !
C RE SC
10 0
57 to 76
!to!48! 37 to 42 ! ! ! ! !
7301B ! ! 43 ! !
30 5 ENT
81 to 92
Chy
%
! 45.8m
32
CF !
39
! ! 831A ! ! !
34
1a ! ! !
pp
! ! Blackheath Bluecoat ! !
!
23
! Church of England ! ! !
"
!
School
!
36
! ! ! ! !
! ! !
1211
30 0
17 to 27
%
! ! ! 8201B 22 9
=
24
38
! 2 2
! 1203 15 15
51 a
%
! ! 0203 229 2
!
25
FB Pond LB . . THE GL
! ! ! !
I
=
REYNOLDS PLA
%
! ! !
15 2
1210
SU NFIE LD
School ! .
BOWATER
.
300
5 to 15
24
! ! 15 15
%
! (dis)
.
! 2 2
.
!
11
Brunsw
15
36
15
7202 7204 ! 6
! !
2
2
12
! ! ! ! ! to to
44
S PLACE
CF
19
22 9
31
%
! 1
i ck
PLACE
! ! ! !
3c 3b 3a 1c
!
Terra ce
8202B
CE
! 12
300
30
8
%
2
! ! to to
12
10 0
13
! ! 0202 7 25
! ! !
d Bdy
2
! !
.
!
2
El Sub Sta CW 7203
50
-A
! ! 9
15
! ! ! ! !152 22
1b
FW
Boro Const & War
I
300
22 13 to 18 19 to 24
30 0
%
2a
" 9 !
10 0
u n fie
! ! ! %
1a
l ds
.
15 2 !.
De f
CW Boys 020451
"
2
!! 2 1201
%
di st 1 to !
.
C hu ! !
%
rch ! 5 CW Brigade
1
15
CF Hall !
CR
1
2
.
to
"
11
CW
! 46.9m %E
S !
15
7201A ! ! ! ! ! 0201
! O ! 56
!
L
2
6 to ! ! ! 8203B 1202
6
! Mil lm 11 10 1 ! ! ! ! !S C !
30 0
450 an Cou Th
Briti e 12 T
4 to 1
09
%
rt A ! 61
107
sh O
1 0310
1
E
(P H ak K 98 to
CLOSE
OL D7105 !
%
109 ) ! !
! DOVER " !
300
ROA 1 !
15 0
%
300
! D
1
CF !
%
50 a 11 LB !
9
%
! 45 0 46.3m ! !
L
!
RUSS EL
= 7104 12 1 !
9
12 3
3
!
5
50 De Havilland Terrace 12 3a !
!
U
"
3
%
12 5
1
"
11
7a
60 37 5 12 9 ! !
7
! ! 8101A !
68 ! 13 1 ! ! "
6107 70a 70 c ! ROM ! ! FW
! AN R
7
72a " !! !
225
OAD
DELACOURT ROA
! 72c !
b S ta
14 1
6
El Su CF
!! ! " CW
300
!
%
300
!! 153 Def
%
! 15 7 225
28b 9101B 15 7a
28
! 15 9a
!
! ! 48.0m Stone ! "
159 !
! !
30
!78
23
74 150 "
!= 16 9 1
7 3
01
! !
SU N LANE
! Filling Station
!
! !
21
20
10 0 !!
D
2 171 !!
! 18 918
= ! " 9a19 1
7103 171a a 19 1
!
! !
U
305
%
" 20 1
A
16 3 47.8m !
!! !! 111A
!
10
!
! ! ! 151 1101B !!
! ! !
15
102 1103A = 46.7m 1102B

=
21
! ! 47.2m
!
%
30 5 !
!
U
%
Sto ne 30 5
! 13 7 .
Shelter
25
! ! ! D
!
ROA ! 134
! HILL 13 0
RS
The Sun
! and OTE !
305
5
HO ! 14 2
%
Slo Shelter46.3m S 2
p in g the Sands 125
(PH)
! 12 !
ma !!
so
n ry 11 2 Hider Court
! ! !
! !
110
ay
! !
HE RV
! 0001 305 1002

bw
! 1001
! !
I
12 0
!
Su
! !
%
305
EY R
45.0m
37 5
103
The !
101
%
100
! Cottage
us
123
121
%
OAD
94 96
! !
! !
92 !
99
97
90 !
id ge !
tb r
125
129
! 8003 9001
Foo 37 5
8002 !
38 1
12 0a
%
%
1
%
Su
11 6
b wa ! !
11 2
%
19
y 4
SM
!
114
%
87
85
8004 !
! !
!
5
The width of the displayed area is 500 m and the centre of the map is located at OS coordinates 540941,177264
The position of the apparatus shown on this plan is given without obligation and warranty, and the accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Service pipes are not shown but their presence should be anticipated. No liability of
any kind whatsoever is accepted by Thames Water for any error or omission. The actual position of mains and services must be verified and established on site before any works are undertaken.
Based on the Ordnance Survey Map with the Sanction of the controller of H.M. Stationery Office, License no. 100019345 Crown Copyright Reserved.
at
St
Thames Water Utilities Ltd, Property Searches, PO Box 3189, Slough SL1 4W, DX 151280 Slough 13 Page 6 of 15
T 0845 070 9148 E searches@thameswater.co.uk I www.thameswater-propertysearches.co.uk
ALS Sewer Map Key
e d
v
Public Sewer Types (Ope rated & Maintained by Tham es Water) Sewer Fittings Other Symbols
o
A feature in a sewer that does not affect the flow in the pipe. Example: a vent Symbols used on maps which do not fall under other general categories
Foul: A sewer designed to convey waste water from domestic and is a fitting as the function of a vent is to release excess gas.
/ Public/Private Pumping Station
industrial sources to a treatment works.
r
Air Valve
Change of characteristic indicator (C.O.C.I.)
Surface Water: A sewer designed to convey surface water (e.g. rain Dam Chase
water from roofs, yards and car parks) to rivers or watercourses. Invert Level
p
Fitting
Summit
M
Meter
Combined: A sewer designed to convey both waste water and surface
water from domestic and industrial sources to a treatment works. Areas
p
Vent Column
Lines denoting areas of underground surveys, etc.
Trunk Surface Water Trunk Foul

Operational Controls Agreement
A feature in a sewer that changes or diverts the flow in the sewer. Example:
A
A hydrobrake limits the flow passing downstream. Operational Site
Storm Relief Trunk Combined
Control Valve
Chamber
Drop Pipe
-
P P Vent Pipe Bio-solids (Sludge)
Tunnel
Ancillary
Proposed Thames Surface Proposed Thames Water Weir Conduit Bridge

Water Sewer Foul Sewer
A
Foul Rising Main
Gallery End Items Other Sewer Types (Not Ope rated or M aintained by Tha mes Water)
End symbols appear at the start or end of a sewer pipe. Examples: an

Undefined End at the start of a sewer indicates that Thames Water has no Foul Sewer Surface Water Sewer
Surface Water Rising Combined Rising Main knowledge of the position of the sewer upstream of that symbol, Outfall on a
Main surface water sewer indicates that the pipe discharges into a stream or river.
s
Combined Sewer Gulley
Proposed Thames Water
Sludge Rising Main Rising Main Outfall
W Culverted Watercourse Proposed
u
Vacuum Undefined End
Abandoned Sewer
t
Inlet
a
Notes:
1) All levels associated with the plans are to Ordnance Datum Newlyn. 6) The text appearing alongside a sewer line indicates the internal diameter of
t
the pipe in milimetres. Text next to a manhole indicates the manhole
2) All measurements on the plans are metric.
reference number and should not be taken as a measurement. If you are
3) Arrows (on gravity fed sewers) or flecks (on rising mains) indicate direction of unsure about any text or symbology present on the plan, please contact a
flow. member of Property Insight on 0845 070 9148.
4) Most private pipes are not shown on our plans, as in the past, this information has
S
not been recorded.
5) ‘na’ or ‘0’ on a manhole level indicates that data is unavailable.
Thames Water Utilities Ltd, Property Searches, PO Box 3189, Slough SL1 4W, DX 151280 Slough 13 Page 11 of 15
T 0845 070 9148 E searches@thameswater.co.uk I www.thameswater-propertysearches.co.uk
22nd June 2018
Leigh Academy
d
ve
ro
pp
-A
APPENDIX C
Proposed Drainage Strategy Drawings
and Calculations
A
us
at
St
25
Responsibility is not accepted for errors made by others in scaling from this drawing.
Internal courtyard - paved space All construction information should be taken from figured dimensions only.
with flush kerb line details 0mm 50mm 100mm

delineating different colours of KEY
d
paving. Area of raised decking with Red Line Boundary
surrounding steps and raised area of Tenanted land excluded from
artificial grass. application
Square movable planters enable the
HARD LANDSCAPE
e
space to be flexable for use by the
North
school. Tarmac
Proposed tree planting and hedge

Concrete Paving (Silver grey)
v
to provide a visual buffer to the
neighbouring sports stand
Concrete Paving (Graphite)
Proposed Growing Area

Green dashed line indicates existing vehicle Courtyard raised decking
Location for growing beds to allow
o
entrance (includes surface finishes) to be retained
pupils the opportunity to plant & Parking
upto secure boundary line BLACKHEATH RUGBY CLUB
sow vegetables with a variety of
Electrical Charging Point
r
flowers
Tenanted land excluded from the scope of SPORTS STAND
- Chargemaster FNCF
343.8 sq m
the development site with Guarding - Black
Sliding Gate
- Product to be confirmed by client
Retaining Wall - Approx. 500-600mm high 47.000
46.592 47.000
47.275 Existing boundary treatment to be
p
along boundary of squash club. Proposed MUGA retained - subject to final
BLACKHEATH
1:12 Ramp
SQUASH CLUB MUGA
Tarmac surface with court line condition inspection.
Proposed Informal Play area to provide small sensory markings surrounded with 3m high Proposed 2.4m High Weld
planting bed (location for a small pupil weather 47.000
47.275 47.000
47.370 fence (and two double access gates) Mesh Secure Line
station) and surface area for outdoor science
p
3125m2
Proposed 3m High Weld Mesh
experiments. INTERNAL
2,780.9 sq m
1654m2sq m
1,653.6
Courts :- MUGA fencing
COURTYARD 3x Basketball Courts (15x28m)
Proposed native vegetation planting to the 1194m2 3x Netball courts (9.7x10.1m) Proposed 1.2m High Bow-Top
HARD Fencing
boundary to form part of the ecological habitat. INFORMAL 4x Tennis Courts (10.97x23.77m)
Inclusion of tree planting to provide visual buffer SPACE 2nr 5v5 Football Pitch (20x30m) Proposed single 1.2m wide gate
A
for neighbouring properties. Proposed double 3m wide gate
127.9 sq m
Proposed overflow parking area within re-inforced SOFT LANDSCAPE
grass grids. Green dash outline indicates extent Existing Tree
of existing games court that is to be
FFL +47.450 Proposed Tree
-
Area of wildflower and fruit tree planting to create small
1,977.1 sq m
1756m2
HARD re-used as part of MUGA
BIN
naturalised orchard. This area could also provide ecological STORE INFORMAL construction Proposed Hedge
PLAY
enhancments such as bird / bat box, insect hotels and bee 47.275
47.000 Proposed Hard Informal Play, Native and Buffer Planting
hives dressed with tarmac surface and
DISA
B feature painted lining
PARK LED Ornamental Shrub Planting
ING
PAR SED
ENTRANCE
20% of parking spaces allocated for electric vehicles
KING
47.000
47.275
PO
COURTYARD
Grass
A
PRO
Proposed staff and visitor cycle parking

RIES
2500m2sq m
1,944.7
Wildflower
LIVE
21.8 sq m
D DE
Proposed tree planting to aid with

Retain existing pedestrain access form Boys PRO Reinforced Grass Grids
N
PO screening for neighbouring

ES A
PARK SED 3 ,977.7

3590m2
Brigade Hall - tbc IN G sq m residential properties
BUS
47.000
47.275
No
Artificial Grass
s
En
try
Proposed location for new sub station Coutyard Planter

K
Street Design - Grenadier movable

E LIN
planter on lockable casters

CYCL
u
AN &
0.3 sq m
SOFT P1 11 Issue to BYUK for costing S3 08.06.18
Existing parking area to be retained (including fencing),
I
ESTR
INFORMAL P01.2 10 Draft Issue for Comment S2 06.06.18

provision of new shrub planting at the site entrance to SPACE P01.1 9 Draft Planning Issue - Amendments to client comments on S0 23.05.18
t
PED
PAR ING
14th May 18 meeting

KING
screen parking area from the road Status Rev DESCRIPTION APP DATE
T
EXIS
CLIENT DESIGNED BY STL

Bouygues UK DRAWN BY CB
CHECKED BY IC
Exisitng pedestrian / cyclist entrance to be retained APPROVED BY GMK
a
ORIGINATOR NO
151900
t
Access control point CONSULTANT
www.stridetreglown.com © Stride Treglown Limited 2018

PROJECT
Site Leigh Academy Blackheath
S
Entrance Old Dover Rd, London SE3 8SY
Existing
school sign
CYCLE PROVISION replaced
Proposed Pupil cycle
• 144 Spaces for Pupil Cycle Parking = 72 cycle stands with shelter
parking within secure area DRAWING TITLE
• 26 Spaces for Visitor and Cycle Parking = 13 Cycle Stands with shelter
(12 Visitor Spaces / 14 Staff Spaces)
Landscape General Arrangements Plan
Exact layout and sizes to be agreed with cyle stand & shelter suplier
SUITABILITY STATUS SCALE

LEVELS
• Refer to Strategic Levels Plan for furhter information S3 : SUITABLE FOR REVIEW & 1 : 500 @ A1
Drawing 151900-STL-XX-00-DR-L-ZZZZ-09130 COMMENT
PROJECT | ORIGINATOR | ZONE | LEVEL | TYPE | ROLE | NUMBER REVISION
LAB-STL-ZZ-XX-DR-L-9001 P1
Responsibility is not accepted for errors made by others in scaling from this drawing.
Internal courtyard - paved space All construction information should be taken from figured dimensions only.
with flush kerb line details 0mm 50mm 100mm

delineating different colours of KEY
d
paving. Area of raised decking PROPOSED
with AREAS
Red Line Boundary
surrounding steps and raised area of Tenanted land excluded from
artificial grass. application
Square movable planters enable the 2
HARDTotal Site -Area
LANDSCAPE Refer to=LAB-STL-ZZ-XX-DR-L-9001
16,000m
e
space to be flexable for use by the
approx.
North
school. Tarmac
(1.6ha)
Proposed tree planting and hedge
Concrete Paving (Silver grey)
v
to provide a visual buffer to the
neighbouring sports stand Permeable Areas = 5000m2
Concrete Paving (Graphite)
(0.5ha)
Proposed Growing Area
Green dashed line indicates existing vehicle Courtyard raised decking
Location for growing beds to allow
o
entrance (includes surface finishes) to be retained
pupils the opportunity to plant & Impermeable Areas = 11000m2
upto secure boundary line BLACKHEATH RUGBY CLUB Parking
sow vegetables with a variety of approx.
Electrical Charging Point
r
flowers (1.1ha)
Tenanted land excluded from the scope of SPORTS STAND
- Chargemaster FNCF
the development site with Guarding - Black
Sliding Gate
- Product to be confirmed by client
Retaining Wall - Approx. 500-600mm high 285.5 sq m 47.000
46.592 47.000
47.275 Existing boundary treatment to be
p
along boundary of squash club. Proposed MUGA retained - subject to final
BLACKHEATH
1:12 Ramp
SQUASH CLUB MUGA
Tarmac surface with court line condition inspection.
Proposed Informal Play area to provide small sensory markings surrounded with 3m high Proposed 2.4m High Weld
planting bed (location for a small pupil weather 47.000
47.275 47.000
47.370 fence (and two double access gates) Mesh Secure Line
station) and surface area for outdoor science
p
Proposed 3m High Weld Mesh
experiments. INTERNAL Courts :- MUGA fencing
23.4 sq m COURTYARD 3x Basketball Courts (15x28m)
Proposed native vegetation planting to the 3x Netball courts (9.7x10.1m) Proposed 1.2m High Bow-Top
HARD Fencing
boundary to form part of the ecological habitat. INFORMAL 4x Tennis Courts (10.97x23.77m)
Inclusion of tree planting to provide visual buffer SPACE 2nr 5v5 Football Pitch (20x30m) Proposed single 1.2m wide gate
A
for neighbouring properties. Proposed double 3m wide gate
Proposed overflow parking area within re-inforced SOFT LANDSCAPE - Refer to LAB-STL-ZZ-XX-DR-L-9140
grass grids. Green dash outline indicates extent Existing Tree
of existing games court that is to be
FFL +47.425 Proposed Tree
-
Area of wildflower and fruit tree planting to create small HARD re-used as part of MUGA
BIN
naturalised orchard. This area could also provide ecological STORE INFORMAL construction Proposed Hedge
PLAY
enhancments such as bird / bat box, insect hotels and bee 47.275
47.000 Proposed Hard Informal Play, Native and Buffer Planting
hives dressed with tarmac surface and
DISA
B feature painted lining
PARK LED Ornamental Shrub Planting
ING
PAR SED
ENTRANCE
20% of parking spaces allocated for electric vehicles
KING
47.000
47.275
PO
COURTYARD
Grass
A
PRO
Proposed staff and visitor cycle parking

RIES
Wildflower
LIVE
D DE
Proposed tree planting to aid with

PRO Reinforced Grass Grids
N
PO screening for neighbouring

ES A
PARK SED
IN G
residential properties
BUS
47.000
47.275
No
Artificial Grass
s
En
try
Proposed location for new sub station Coutyard Planter

K
Street Design - Grenadier movable

E LIN
planter on lockable casters

CYCL
u
P2 12 Updated issue to BYUK for Costing S3 13.06.18
AN &
SOFT P1 11 Issue to BYUK for costing S3 08.06.18

Existing parking area to be retained (including fencing),
I
ESTR
INFORMAL P01.2 10 Draft Issue for Comment S2 06.06.18

provision of new shrub planting at the site entrance to SPACE P01.1 9 Draft Planning Issue - Amendments to client comments on S0 23.05.18
t
PED
PAR ING
14th May 18 meeting

KING
screen parking area from the road Status Rev DESCRIPTION APP DATE
T
EXIS
CLIENT DESIGNED BY STL

Bouygues UK DRAWN BY CB
CHECKED BY IC
Exisitng pedestrian / cyclist entrance to be retained APPROVED BY GMK
a
ORIGINATOR NO
151900
t
Access control point CONSULTANT
www.stridetreglown.com © Stride Treglown Limited 2018

PROJECT
Site Leigh Academy Blackheath

CYCLE PROVISION
S
Entrance Old Dover Rd, London SE3 8SY
• 144 Spaces for Pupil Cycle Parking = 72 cycle stands with shelter Existing JOB NUMBER : 8/1752
• 26 Spaces for Visitor and Staff Cycle Parking = 13 cycle stands with school sign
DRAWING NUMBER : SK02
shelter (12 Visitor Spaces / 14 Staff Spaces) replaced
Proposed Pupil cycle TITLE : Proposed Areas
• Exact layout and sizes to be agreed with cycle stand & shelter parking within secure area DRAWING TITLE
suplier.
• BREEAM requirements for ratio of covered and non covered cycle
Landscape General Arrangements
DRAWN BY : JRS Plan
stands to be confirmed. DATE : 15/06/18
REVISION: P1
SUITABILITY STATUS SCALE
LEVELS
• Refer to Strategic Levels Plan for further information S3 : SUITABLE FOR REVIEW & 1 : 500 @ A1
Drawing 151900-STL-XX-00-DR-L-ZZZZ-09130 COMMENT
PROJECT | ORIGINATOR | ZONE | LEVEL | TYPE | ROLE | NUMBER REVISION
LAB-STL-ZZ-XX-DR-L-9001 P2
Project Job no.
Leigh Academy 8/1752
Clancy Consulting Ltd Calcs for Start page no./Revision
Queens House, Soakaway 1 1
123-129 Queens Road,
Calcs by Calcs date Checked by Checked date Approved by Approved date
Norwich, NR1 3PL.
GS 13/06/2018
d
PLANE INFILTRATION SYSTEM DESIGN
ve
In accordance with CIRIA C753 SUDS
Tedds calculation version 2.0.03
Design rainfall intensity

Location of catchment area; London
Impermeable area drained to the system; A = 3125.0 m2
Return period; Period = 100 yr
ro
Ratio 60 min to 2 day rainfall of 5 yr return period; r = 0.440
5-year return period rainfall of 60 minutes duration; M5_60min = 20.0 mm
Increase of rainfall intensity due to global warming; pclimate = 40 %
Infiltration blanket details
pp
Depth of infiltration blanket; d = 800 mm
Porosity; n = 0.9
Soil infiltration rate; f = 10.010-6 m/s
Table equations
Rainfall intensity; i = M100 / D
Minimum base area required; Ab = A  i  D / (n  d + f  D)
-A
Duration, D Growth M5 rainfalls Growth 100 year Intensity, i Blanket
(min) factor Z1 (mm) factor Z2 rainfall, (mm/hr) area (m2)
M100 (mm)
5; 0.39; 10.8; 1.92; 20.8; 249.87; 90;
10; 0.54; 15.0; 1.99; 29.9; 179.44; 129;
15; 0.65; 18.1; 2.01; 36.5; 145.93; 156;
30; 0.82; 22.9; 2.02; 46.2; 92.31; 195;
60; 1.00; 28.0; 1.99; 55.6; 55.61; 230;
A
120; 1.19; 33.4; 1.94; 64.9; 32.46; 256;

240; 1.39; 39.0; 1.90; 74.0; 18.51; 268;
360; 1.53; 42.8; 1.87; 80.0; 13.33; 267;
600; 1.70; 47.6; 1.83; 87.1; 8.71; 252;
us
1440; 2.07; 58.1; 1.76; 101.9; 4.25; 201;

Min area of blanket req'd; Ab_max = 268 m2
Time to empty blanket to half volume - Eq.25.6(1); ts50 = n  d / (2  f) = 10hr
PASS - Infiltration system discharge time less than or equal to 24 hours
at
St
Project Job no.
Norwich, NR1 3PL.
GS 12/06/2018
d
ve

ro
pp
Porosity; n = 0.9
Table equations
-A
M100 (mm)
5; 0.39; 10.8; 1.92; 20.8; 249.87; 57;
10; 0.54; 15.0; 1.99; 29.9; 179.44; 81;
15; 0.65; 18.1; 2.01; 36.5; 145.93; 99;
30; 0.82; 22.9; 2.02; 46.2; 92.31; 124;
60; 1.00; 28.0; 1.99; 55.6; 55.61; 145;
A
120; 1.19; 33.4; 1.94; 64.9; 32.46; 162;

240; 1.39; 39.0; 1.90; 74.0; 18.51; 170;
360; 1.53; 42.8; 1.87; 80.0; 13.33; 169;
600; 1.70; 47.6; 1.83; 87.1; 8.71; 159;
us
1440; 2.07; 58.1; 1.76; 101.9; 4.25; 127;

at
St
Project Job no.
Norwich, NR1 3PL.
GS 12/06/2018
d
ve

ro
pp
Porosity; n = 0.9
Table equations
-A
M100 (mm)
5; 0.39; 10.8; 1.92; 20.8; 249.87; 103;
10; 0.54; 15.0; 1.99; 29.9; 179.44; 148;
15; 0.65; 18.1; 2.01; 36.5; 145.93; 180;
30; 0.82; 22.9; 2.02; 46.2; 92.31; 225;
60; 1.00; 28.0; 1.99; 55.6; 55.61; 264;
A
120; 1.19; 33.4; 1.94; 64.9; 32.46; 294;

240; 1.39; 39.0; 1.90; 74.0; 18.51; 308;
360; 1.53; 42.8; 1.87; 80.0; 13.33; 307;
600; 1.70; 47.6; 1.83; 87.1; 8.71; 289;
us
1440; 2.07; 58.1; 1.76; 101.9; 4.25; 231;

at
St
Project Job no.
Leigh Academy
Norwich, NR1 3PL.
JS 19/06/2018
d
ve

ro
pp
Porosity; n = 0.9
Table equations
-A
M100 (mm)
5; 0.39; 10.8; 1.92; 20.8; 249.87; 72;
10; 0.54; 15.0; 1.99; 29.9; 179.44; 103;
15; 0.65; 18.1; 2.01; 36.5; 145.93; 125;
30; 0.82; 22.9; 2.02; 46.2; 92.31; 156;
60; 1.00; 28.0; 1.99; 55.6; 55.61; 184;
A
120; 1.19; 33.4; 1.94; 64.9; 32.46; 205;

240; 1.39; 39.0; 1.90; 74.0; 18.51; 214;
360; 1.53; 42.8; 1.87; 80.0; 13.33; 214;
600; 1.70; 47.6; 1.83; 87.1; 8.71; 202;
us
1440; 2.07; 58.1; 1.76; 101.9; 4.25; 161;

at
St
Project Job no.
Norwich, NR1 3PL.
GS 12/06/2018
d
ve

ro
pp
Porosity; n = 0.9
Table equations
-A
M100 (mm)
5; 0.39; 10.8; 1.92; 20.8; 249.87; 34;
10; 0.54; 15.0; 1.99; 29.9; 179.44; 49;
15; 0.65; 18.1; 2.01; 36.5; 145.93; 60;
30; 0.82; 22.9; 2.02; 46.2; 92.31; 75;
60; 1.00; 28.0; 1.99; 55.6; 55.61; 88;
A
120; 1.19; 33.4; 1.94; 64.9; 32.46; 98;

240; 1.39; 39.0; 1.90; 74.0; 18.51; 102;
360; 1.53; 42.8; 1.87; 80.0; 13.33; 102;
600; 1.70; 47.6; 1.83; 87.1; 8.71; 96;
us
1440; 2.07; 58.1; 1.76; 101.9; 4.25; 77;

at
St
Project Job no.
Norwich, NR1 3PL.
GS 12/06/2018
d
ve

ro
pp
Porosity; n = 0.9
Table equations
-A
M100 (mm)
5; 0.39; 10.8; 1.92; 20.8; 249.87; 48;
10; 0.54; 15.0; 1.99; 29.9; 179.44; 68;
15; 0.65; 18.1; 2.01; 36.5; 145.93; 83;
30; 0.82; 22.9; 2.02; 46.2; 92.31; 103;
60; 1.00; 28.0; 1.99; 55.6; 55.61; 122;
A
120; 1.19; 33.4; 1.94; 64.9; 32.46; 136;

240; 1.39; 39.0; 1.90; 74.0; 18.51; 142;
360; 1.53; 42.8; 1.87; 80.0; 13.33; 141;
600; 1.70; 47.6; 1.83; 87.1; 8.71; 133;
us
1440; 2.07; 58.1; 1.76; 101.9; 4.25; 106;

at
St
e d
o v
p r
Ap
-
A
u s
a t
S t
e d
o v
p r
Ap
-
A
u s
a t
S t

LAB-STT-ZZ-XX-RP-C-0010 - Flood Risk Assessment - C01 PDF

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

LAB-STT-ZZ-XX-RP-C-0010 - Flood Risk Assessment - C01 PDF

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Head Office:

LEIGH ACADEMY, BLACKHEATH

Name Signature Date

LAB STT ZZ XX RP C 0010 C01

Page 00- Cover Page

C01 21/09/2020 Issue for Stage 6 Approval

REV Date Revision Title

22nd June 2018

Prepared on Behalf of:

Clancy Consulting Limited

t: +44 (0)1603 305190

Prepared for: Bouygues UK Ltd

Prepared by: Clancy Consulting Limited

REVISION REASON FOR ISSUE DATE OF ISSUE

A Draft Issued for Comment 19th June 2018

Prepared by: Jack Cozens

Checked by: James Savage BSc. (hons) GMICE MIET

Approved by: Greg Scott B.Eng.(Hons), C.Eng., M.I.Struct.E

2.0 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT....................................................................................................... 6

3.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS ................................................................................................................ 7

4.0 FLOOD POTENTIAL ........................................................................................................................... 9

6.0 NPPF AND LOCAL POLICY............................................................................................... 20

7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................... 22

Figure 7 - Existing Public Sewer Plan (TW) ............................................................................................... 14

Appendix A Topographical Survey

Appendix B CCTV Survey and Thames Water Asset Plan

Appendix C Drainage Strategy and Calculations

1.2 Background Information

probability of river flooding (1%-0.1%) or between a 1 in 200 and 1 in 1000 annual

probability of river flooding (>1%) or a 1 in 200 or greater annual probability of

Figure 1 - Risk of Flooding from Rivers and Seas (EA)

2.0 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT

− Flood maps from the Environment Agency published on line (EA)

− Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Greenwich Council October 2011 (SFRA)

− MLM Site Investigation

− Royal Greenwich Local Plan Core Strategy

3.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS

Lat (WGS84) N51:28:33 (51.475971)

Long (WGS84) E0:01:38 (0.027333)

National Grid TQ408771 / TQ4089177172

Figure 2 - Site Location Plan (Google Maps)

- Access road from Lizban Street north west of the site.

3.1.4 The site is bounded by the following:

- South: Old Dover Road

- East: Residential gardens and dwellings.

3.2.4 No Ground Water was encountered during the investigation works.

3.3 Development Proposal

4.0 FLOOD POTENTIAL

4.2 Potential for Flooding

(i) From surface water overland flow off site.

(iii) From artificial sources such as reservoirs.

(iv) From the surcharging of drains or sewers on the site.

4.4 Flood Risk Probabilities

(i) Flooding from Surface Water – Overland flow

(ii) Flooding from Groundwater

Figure 4 – Groundwater Flood Events (SFRA)

Figure 5 - BREEAM Checklist for Achieving Avoidance from Flooding

Figure 6 - Risk of Flooding from Reservoirs (EA)

(iv) Flooding from Drainage on site

Figure 7 - Existing Public Sewer Plan (TW)

piped system and discharged to the Thames Water system.

5.2 Proposed Drainage

1. Infiltration into the subsoil via soakaways or permeable paving.