Coverage for midterms

Week 1
I. Jurisdiction
a. Courts and its Jurisdiction in Criminal cases
b. Republic Act 7691 amending BP 129
c. Venue in Criminal Cases is Jurisdictional
1. Isip v. People, G.R. No.. 170298, June 26, 2007
2. Landbank of the Philippines v. Belisata, G.R. No. 170298, June 26, 2007
d. SC Administrative Circular No. 09-94
e. The 1991 Revised Rules on Summary Procedure
f. Republic Act No. 8493 (r1he Speedy Trial Act of e. SC Circular No. 38-98 (Implementing
Rules to RA 8493)
g. Pres. Dec. No. 1606, as amended (Sandiganbayan Law)
h. RA 8249 (Amendments to Sandi-anbavart Law)
i. Rep. Act No. 6770 (Ombudsman Law)

II. Substantive Rights

a. Const. (1987), art. III; Const. (1987), art. VIII

b. sec. Rule 115, 2000 Rules on Criminal Procedure
c. Republic Act No. 7438; DOJ-NPS Manual, Par-, XI, secs. 1, 2
d. JJWA, secs. 60-61; DOJ Inquest and Preliminary Investigation Procedure a. c. DOJ
Department Order No. 70 ["2000 NPS Rule on Appeal"]
e. DOJ Circular No. 61 (1993) ["New Rules on Inquest"]
f. DOJ National Prosecution Service Manual for Prosecutors (see reserved section)
g. Special Rules and Procedures

III. Venue in Criminal Cases is Jurisdictional

3. Isip v. People, G.R. No.. 170298, June 26, 2007
4. Landbank of the Philippines v. Belisata, G.R. No. 170298, June 26, 2007
a. Jurisdiction to Issue Hold Departure Orders
5. Mondejar v. Buban, A.M. No. MTJ-01-1349, July 12, 2001
b. Jurisdiction determined by the allegations of the Complaint
6. Foz v. People, October 9, 2009, G.R. No. 167764
c. Jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan
7. People v. Sandiganbayan, August 25, 2009, G.R. No. 167304
8. Serrana v. Sandiganbayan, January 22, 2008, G.R. 162059
9. Esquivel v. Ombudsman, September 17, 2002, G.R. 137237
d. Jurisdiction of the Ombudsman
10. Department of Justice v. Liwag, February 11, 2005, G.R. No. 149311
11. Lazatin v. Desierto, June 5, 2009, G.R. No. 147097
12. Presidential Ad-Hoc Fact Finding Committee v. Desierto, July 24, 2007
13. Castro v. Deloria, January 27, 2009, G.R. No. 163586
e. Review of Decisions of the Ombudsman
14. Antonino v. Desierto, December 18, 2008, G.R. No. 144492
f. Procedure before the Ombudsman
15. Sesbreno v. Aglugub, February 28, 2005, A.M. No. MTJ 05-1581
 g. Power of the Secretary of Justice over Prosecutors
16. Punzalan v. de la Pena, July 21, 2004, G.R. No. 158543
h. Role of the Office of the Solicitor General in Criminal Cases
17. People v. Duca, October 9, 2009, G.R. No. 171175
Week 2

I. Preliminary Investigation
1. Community Rural Bank v. Talavera, 455 SCRA 34
2. Serag v. Court of Appeals, 473 SCRA 590
3. Soriano v. People, G.R. No.162336, February 1, 2010
4. Samuel Lee v. KBC Bank, G.R. No. 164673, January 15, 2011
5. Okabe v. Gutierrez, May 27, 2004, G.R.No. 150185

II. Prosecution of Offenses

a. Rule 110, sec. 13;
6. People v. Fernandez, 183 SCRA 511 (1990)
7. People v. Lopez, 3YZ SCRA 684 (1999)
b. Cause of accusation
c. Rule 110, sec. 9
8. People v. Chan Toco, 12 Phil. 262 (1908)
9. BolitaaL-i v. CFI-Batangas, 115 SCRA 729 (1982)
10. N/latilde v. Jabson, 68 SCRA 456 (1975)
d. Prosecution of Civil Action
11. People v. Gallo, G.R. No. 124736, resolution dated September 29, 1999
12. Vasquez v. CA, 314 SCR , 460 (1999);
13. People v. Llanto, G.R. No. 14645S, January 20, 2003
e. Date, place and time of commission
f. Rule 110, secs. 10, 11
14. People v. Lizada, G.R. Nos. 143468-71, January 24, 2003
15. People v. Ladrillo, 320 SCRA 61 (1999)
g. Definition
h. when required Rule 112, sec. 1; DOJ-N PS Manual, Part III, secs. 1, 2, 3, 7
i. RJCL, secs. 13, 8
16. Hashim v. Boncan, 71 Phil. 216 (1941)
17. Tandoc v. Resultan, 175 SCRA 37 (1989)
18. Doromal v. Sandiganbayan, 177 SCRA 354 (1989)
19. Cojuangco v. Sa-ndiganbayan, 190 SCPA 226 (1990)
20. Webb v. De Leon, 247 SCRA 652 (1995)
j. Persons authorized to conduct − Rule 112, sec. 2
k. DOJ-NPS Manual, sec. 6; RA 6770, secs. 11 (4)(a), 15
21. Velasco v. Casaclang, 294 SCRA 396 (1998);
22. Balgos v. Sandiganbayan, 176 SCR-A 287 (19S9)
l. Scope
23. Padcran-a v. Drilon, 196 SCRA 86 (1991)
m. Procedure in cases where preliminary investigation required A. In
cases

Week 3
I. Arrest
a. Definition
b. Warrantless Arrest
 1. Saraum vs People (781 SCRA)
2. Comerciante vs People (763 SCRA 587)
3. Antiquera vs People (712 SCRA)
4. People vs Vasquez (714 SCRA)

Week 4
I. Bail
a. RULE 114-BAIL- Petition for bail/ Motion to reduce bail
b. Nature and Definition
c. Definition
d. persons covered or required to post bail
e. Rule 114, secs. 1, 3;
1. Feliciano v. Pasicol-ani, 2 SCRA SISS (1961)
2. Defensor-Santiago v. Vasquez, 217 SCRA 663 (1993")
3. Cortes v. Catral, 279 SCRA 1 (1997)
4. People v. TvIanallo. 400 SCRA 129 (2003)
f. Nature
g. Matter of right
5. People v. Donato, 198 SCRA 130 (1991)
h. Arraignment not pre-requisite to bail
6. Lavides v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 129670, February 1, 2000
7. Serapio v. Sandiganbavan, 396 SCRA 443 (2003)
i. Discretionary − Const. (1987), art. 111', sec. 13
j. Rule 114, secs. 5, 6, 7, 8, 24
k. RjCL, sec. 17
8. Teehankee v. Director of Prisons, 76 Phil. 756 (1946)
9. People v. San Diego, 26 SCRA 522 (1988)
10. Ocampo v. Bernabe, 77 Phil. 55 (1946)
11. Siazon v. Judge, 4 SCRA 184 (1971)
12. I,Jamolo v. Narisima, 252 SCRA 613 (1995)
l. Duties of judges
13. Cortes v. Ca ral, 279 SCRA 1 (1997)
14. People v. Tuppal, 395 SCRA 72 (2003)
15. Enrile v. Perez, G.R. NTo, 147785
m. Corporate surety - Rule 114, secs. 1. 2, 10, 13,
n. Cash deposit - Rule 114, secs. 1, 2, 14, 21;
o. Property Bond - Rule 1, 2, 11, 12, 13, 21, 22;
p. Recognizance - Rule 114, secs. 1, 2, 15, 16;
q. Amount of bail; when not required
r. Guidelines - Rule 114, sec. 9;
16. Villasenor v. Abano, 0e, 41 SCRA1 (1971)
17. Dela Camara v. Ena 21 SCRA 321 (1967)
s. When not required or reduced

Week 5
I. Rights of the Accused
1. Crisostomo v. Sandiganbayan, 456 SCRA 45
2. Andrado v. People, 452 SCRA 685
3. Olivarez v. Court of Appeals, 465 SCRA 465
4. Libuit v. People, 469 SCRA 510
5. Magtolis v. Salud, 469 SCRA 439
 6. Herrera v. Alba, 460 SCRA 197
7. Yulo v. People, 452 SCRA 705
8. Petition for Radio and Television Coverage of the Multiple Murder Cases
Against Maguindanao Governor Ampatuan, June 2011
a. Advertisements

Week 6
I. Arraignment and Plea
a. Motion for Bill of Particular
b. Bill of Particulars
c. Motion for Production and Inspection of Documents
d. Motion to Suspend Arraignment
i. Arraignment Nature and purpose − Rule 116, sec. 1(a), (b), (e) DOJ-NPS Manual, Part
V11
1. People v. Alicando, 251 SCRA 293 (1995)
2. cople v. Estornaca, 256 SC1'\_A 421 (1996)
e. Procedure; appointment of counsel de officio
f. Rule 116, secs. 1(a', (f)
g. Motion for Bill of Particulars − Rule 116, sec. 9
3. People v. Gutierrez, 91 Phil. 876 (1952)
4. People v. Abad Santos, 76 Phil. 744 (1946)
5. People v. Arlegui, 128 SCRA 556 (1984)
h. Motion for Production and Inspection of Material Evidence in possession of the Prosecution
−Rule 116, sec. 10
6. People v. Roldan, 99 SCRA 422 (1980)
i. Suspension of arraignment - Rule 116, sec. 11
j. Rule 111, secs. 6, 7
k. DOJ Department Order No. 70 (Series of 2000)
l. Program for Juveniles in "on,11 ct with Law −Rj1CL, secs. 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
m. Plea A. Nature and purpose
n. procedure - Rule 116, sec. 1(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g)
o. RJCL, sec. 27
p. SC AM No. 03-1-09-SC, Part. B(2), DOJ-NPS M-nual Part VII
q. Types of pleas
r. Presumption of innocence − Const. (1987), art. III, sec. 14(2)
7. People v. Alba 305 SCR R 811 '11999)
s. Refusal to enter plea; conditional plea − Rule 116, sec. 1(c)
8. People v. Strong, 63 SC13--k 113 970
t. Plea of guilt but with exculpatory evidence − Rule 116, sec. i(d),,-
u. Withdrawal of improvident plea of guilt − Rule 116, sec. 5
9. People v. De Ocampo Gonzaga, 127 SCRAb 158 (1984)
v. Guilty
i. to a lesser offense
Plea − Rule 116, sec. 2
Rule 118, sec. 1(a)
SC AM No. 03-1-09-SC, Part B(5)
10. People v. Villarama, 210 SCRA 246 (1992)
11. People v, Mamarion, 412 SCRA 438 (2003)
ii. Plea of guilty to non-capital offense - Rule 118, sec. 4
iii. Plea of guilty to capital offense*
w. Rep. Act No. 9346
 x. Rule 116; sec. 3
11. People v. Sevilleno, 305 SCRA 519 (1999)
12. People v. Laki:-idanum, 304 SCRA 429 (1999)
13. People v. Alica_ndo, 251 SCRA 293 (1995)
14. People v. Serna, 130 SCRA 550 (1984)
15. People v. Tiongson, 13 )0 SCRA 614 (1984)
16. People v. Can ay FZ_. , 152 SCR 401 (1937)
17. People Effects of improvident plea
18. People v. 1~vlo!Lna, G.K. Nos. 14112933, December 14, 2001

II. PRE TRIAL

a. Nature and purpose
i. Rule 118, sec. 1
ii. SC AM No. 03-1-09-SC, Part B(5), (6)
b. Matters covered by Pre-trial
c. Effect of pre-trial agreement and pre-trial order − Rule 118, secs. 1, 2, 4
19. People v. Abelita, 210 SCRA 446
20. People v. Uy, 327 SCRA 335 (2000)
d. Effect of non-appearance − Rule 118, sec. 3
21. Fine v. CA, 162 SCRA 446 (198S)

Week 7
Allowance meeting for quizzes and Recap of matters discussed
Week 8
Allowance meeting for quizzes and Recap of matters discussed

COVERAGE FOR FINAL EXAMINATIONS (8 weeks)

Week 1
I. Motion to Quash
a. Period of filing −Rule 117, secs. 1, 8
b. Effects of sustaining the motion - Rule 117, secs. 5, 6
c. Provisional dismissal
d. Rule 117, sec. 8
1. People v. Lacson, G.R. No. 149453, May 28, 2002
2. People v. Lacson, G.R. No. 149453, April 1, 2003
3. People v. Lacson, G.R. No. 149453, October 7, 2003
4. Condrada v. People, 398 SCRA 482 (2003)
Week 2
I. Trial
a. Order and Procedure Notice of trial
b. Speedy and continuous trial −Rule 119, secs. 1; 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9,'_0; 17-,JCL,. sec. 29
c. Cf. RA 8493, sec. 7 [par. 21; DOT-N-PS Manual, Part IX
d. Sce also (11) Public Defender's duty where accused is detained
e. Prisoner
f. Rule (2) − Order of trial
- Generally \
- 119, sec.
g. Rule 119, Sec. 20
 h. Rule 119, secs. 11, 21
i. DOjjj-N_PS Manual, Part IX, sec. 4, 12, 15, 16f
j. Trial of several accused
k. discharge of accused to be state witness
l. Rule 119, secs. 16, 17, 18
m. RA 6981
n. PD 1732 (October 13, 1980)
1. People v. Ocimar, 212 SCRA 711 (1992)
2. People v. Ramirez, 169 SCRA 711 (1989)
3. People v. Moreno, 208 SCRA 86 (1992)
o. Consolidation of trials of related offenses −Rule 119, sec. 22
p. Examination of witnesses outside or in advance of trial
q. Witnesses for the prosecution −Rule 119, secs. 15, 14
r. Witnesses for the accused −Rule 119, secs. 12, 13, 14
s. Examination of Child Witnesses 1. Child Witness Rule (CWR), secs. 8, 9, 10, 11,
12,13,14,15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 31
t. Demurrer to the evidence - Rule 119, sec. 23
4. Ocampo v. CA, 180 SCRA 27 (1989)
5. Onas v. Sandiganbayan, 178 SCRA 261 (1989)

Week 3
I. Judgment
a. Definition and form - Rule 120, sec. 1
1. People v. Lizada, G.R. Nos. 143468-71, January 24, 2003
2. People v. Pablo, 98 SCRA 289 (1980)
3. People v. Escober, 157 SCRA 541 (1988)
4. People v. Toling, 91 SCRA 382 (1979)
b. Types of judgments and remedies against such judgment
c. Acquittal − Rule 120, sec. 2 [par. 2]
d. Const. (1987), art. III, sec. 21
e. Rule 117, secs. 7
5. Galman v. Sandiganbayan, 144 SCRA 43 (1986)
f. Rule 65, sec. 1, 1997 Rules on Civil Procedure
6. Manantari v. CA, 350 SCRA 387 (2001)
g. Conviction − Rule 120, sec. 2 [par. 11; - Rules 121, 122-125
h. Rule 119, sec. 24
i. Judgment in particular instances
- judgment for two or more offenses − Rule 120, sec. 3
- Judgment in case of variance between allegation and proof − Rule 120, sec. 4
7. Pcop]2 %-. GuQvara, SCRA 7 1 0 (19Sq)
8. Sayson v. People, 166 SCRA 680 (19SS)
9. Vino v. People, 17S SCR 626 (19S9)
j. Guidelines for Promulgation
k. Finality of judgment - Rule 120, sec. 8
l. Rule 120, sec. 7 [second sentence] (in death penalty cases)
Week 4
I. New Trial, Motion for Reconsideration
a. Before finality of judgment
- Motion for New Trial
b. Rule 124, secs. 114, 15
1. People v. A Imendras
 2. People v. Datu, G.R. No. 136796, February 19, 2003
3. People v. Ebias, G.R. No. 127130, October 121 2000
4. People v. Alicando, 251 SCRA 293 (1995)11
5. People v. Del Mundo, 262 SCRFA 266 (1-996)
6. Agulto v. CA, 181 SCRA 80 (1990)
7. Alegre v. Reyes, 161 SCRA 226 (1988)
8. Valdez v. Aguilizan, 133 SCRA 150 (1984)
9. People v. Amparado, 156 SCRA 712 (1987)
c. Motion for Reconsideration

Week 5
I. Appeal
a. Rule 121, secs. 1, 3, 4, 5, 6
b. Rule 124, sec. 16
1. People v. Enriquez, 90 Phil. 423
c. Rule 119, sec. 24
d. Generally Rule 122, secs. 1, 2, 3, 6, 9
e. Rules 123, 124, 125
2. People v. Molina, G.R. Nos. 141129-33, December 14, 2001
f. Specific Procedures on Appeal
- Death penalty cases
f. Rule 122, sec. 11- Withdrawal of appeal
g. Rule 122, sec. 12
3. People v. Salliling, 249 SCRA 185 (1995)
h. Effects of death of accused pending appeal
4. Villegas v. CA, 271 SCRA 148 (1997)
i. After finality of judgment
5. Echegaray v. Secretary of justice, G.R. No. 132601
6. Resolutions dated January January 4 and 19, 1999
7. People v. Parazo, G.R. No. 121176, July 8, 1999
8. People v. Gallo, G.R. No. 124736, September 29, 1999
j. Effect of failure to appeal a patently wrong judgment
9. People v. Barro Sr., 338 SCRA 312 (2000)

Week 6
I. Search and Seizure
a. Nature, scope and definition
b. Const. (1987), art. III, secs. 2, 3
c. Rule 126, secs. 1, 13
1. Stonehill v. Diokno, 20 SCRA 383 (1967)
2. Katz v. U.S., 389 U.S. 347 (1967)
3. People v. Marti, 193 SCRA 57 (1991)
d. Constitutional and statutory boundaries
e. limitations on State action
- Nature of right protected
- waiver of protected right
4. Villanueva v. Querubin, 48 SCRA 349 (1972)
5. People v. Marti, 193 SCRA 57 (1991)
6. /TO a. Gua-,/zon v. De Villa, 181 SCRA 623
f. Rule 126, sec. 1
7. People v. Aruta, 2SS SCRA 626
 g. Venue of application
h. jurisdiction of court − Rule 126, sec. 2
i. BP 129 (as amended by RA 7691), sec. 21
j. interim Rules (January 11, 1983)
8. Malaloan v. CA, 232 SCRA 249 (1994)
9. People v. CA, 2911 SCRA 400 (1' )
k. Requisites for issuance − Rule 126, sec. 1
l. Const. (1987), art. III, sec. 2
10. Paper Industries Corporation of the Philippines v. Asuncion, 307 SCRA 253
(1999)
m. Concept of probable cause in search warrants
11. People v. Estrada, 296 SCRA 383 (1998)
12. People v. Syjuco, 64 Phil. 667 (1937)
13. Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 613 (1983)
14. Stonehill v. Diokno, 20 SCRA 15 (1967)
15. Columbia Pictures Inc. v. CA, 237 SCRA 367 (1994)
16. Cf. Columbia Pictures Entertainment hic. v. CA, 262 SCRA 219 (1996)
n. Determining probable cause Determining Person responsible − Const. (1987), art. 111, sec. 2
o. Rule 126, sec. 4
p. Process - Rule 126, sec. 5
17. Roan v. Gonzales, 145 SCI 687
18. Alih v. Castro, 15I SCRA
q. Description of things to be seized
19. K'rip v. MaPalintal, 306 SCRA 70 (1999)
r. Description of place to be searched
20. Paper Industries Corporation of the Philippines v. Asuncion, 307 SCRA 253
(1999)
s. Property that may be seized −Rule 126, sec. 3
t. Form and content of warrant
u. lifetime −Rule 126, sec. 1
21. Bache v. Ruiz, 37 SCRA 823
22. Mustang Lumber v. CA, 257 SCRA 430 (1996)
v. Validity of warrant
23. People v. Estrada, 296 SCRA 383
24. People v. CA, 291. SCRA400 (1998)
w. Warrantless a. Search incident to lawful arrest −Rule 126, sec. 13
25. Cf. (1) United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259 (1990)
26. People v. Padilla, 269 SCRA 402 (1997)
27. People v. Chua Ho San, 308 SCRA 432 (1999)
28. Office of the Court Administrator v. Barron, 297 SCRA 376 (1998)
29. Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969)
30. Nolasco v. Pano, 147 SCRA 509 (1987)
31. Cf. Nolasco v. Pano, 139 SCRA 152 (1985)
32. Posadas v. CA, 188 SCRA 2 8 (1 )
33. 99IrIE- Malacat v. CA, 283 SC' 159
y. Consented search
34. People eople v. Malasigui, 63 Phil. 221 (1936)
35. Alvarez v. CFI, 64 Phil. 48 (1937)
z. peaceful submission not consent to search
36. Garcia v. Locsin, 65 Phil. 6891 (1938)
i. Effect of voluntary surrender
 37. People v. Agbot, 106 SIMA 325 (1981);
ii. Effect of posting bail - Rule 126, sec. 14, C,f. Rule 114, sec. 26
iii. Stop and frisk
- automobile roadblocks, and "other less intrusive searches"
38. Teary v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)
39. Delav, are v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648 (1979)
40. Calballes v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 136292,
41. J,L, i u ary 15, 2r,,n? −valnionte v, De Villa, 178 SCRA 211 1
42. TVIfinahliv. CA, 2SOSCRA 400 (1997)
43. Malacat v. CA, 283 SCRA 159 (1998)
44. People Lasema, 278 SCRA 561,
iv. Vehicles pursuit Pursuit" S
45. Carol! v. US, 267 U.S. 132 (1;25)
46. Papa v. Imago, 22 SCRA 857
47. Obra v. CA, 317 SCRA 594 (1999)
v. In plain sight
vi. "Private searches"
48. People v. Marti, 193 SCRA 57 (1991)
49. Waterous Drug Corporation v. NLRC, 2S0 SCRA. 735 (1997)
vii. "Extraordinary circumstances"
50. People v. De Gracia, 233 SCRA 716 (19014)
viii. Procedure for service of warrant
ix. post-service procedure
x. Service of warrant
xi. Time of search - Rule 126, sec. 9
xii. Two-witness rule - Rule 126, sec. 8
50. People v. Gesmundo, 219 SCRA 743 (1993)
xiii. Breaking of door or N%-indow to effect search I
xiv. Post-service procedure
51. People v. Gesmundo, 219 SCRA 743 (1993)
xv. Issuance of Receipt - Rule 126, sec. 11
52. People v. Lacbanes, 270 SCRA 193 (1997)
xvi. Delivery of property and inventory
xvii. return and proceedings on the return − Rule 126, sec. 12
53. People v. Gesmundo, 219 SCRA 743
xviii. Remedies against unreasonable search and seizure Motion to quash search warrant or
suppress evidence
ix. Rule 126, sec. 14
xx. RA 8493, sec. 2(d) (cf. Rule 118, sec. 2[dj;)
54. Stonehill v. Dickno 20 SCRA 3 M (1967)
55. c_ n - Bache v. Ruiz, 37 SCRA 823 (1971' )
56. Rakes v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 (1978)
57. Paper Industries Corporation of the Philippines v. Asuncion, 307 SCRA 253
(1999)
xxi. Return of property illegally seized
58. Uy Kheytin v. Villareal, 42 Phil. 892 (1920)
59. o Niagoncia v. Palacio, 80 Phil. 170 (1948)
60. Collector v. Villaluz, 71 SCRA 356 (1976)
61. Mata v. Bavona, 128 SCRA 388 (1984)
xxii. RULE 113 - ARREST Pertinent Pleadings
- Petition for Habeas Corpus
 - Motion for Judicial Determination of Probable Cause
- Civil Suit for Damages I Nature and Definition
- Definition Rule 113, secs. 1, 2
62. David et aL v. Gloria Macapagall-Arro-yo et al., G.R. No. 171396 (April
2006)
63. Sanchez v. Demetriou, 227 SCRA 627 (1993)
64. People v. SequElo, 264 SCRA 79 (1996)
65. Defensor-Santiago v. Vasquez, 217 SCRA 663 (1993)
66. Cojuangco v. Sandiganbayan, 300 SCRA 367 (1998)
- Diplomatic and parliamentary immunities from arrest
- Const. (1987), art. VI, sec. 11
- Rev. Pen. Code, art. 145
- Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, Arts. 31, 37; - Visiting Forces Agreement,
Art. VII
67. People v. Siao, 327 SCRA 231 (2000)
Types
- With warrant of arrest
- When and how warrant issued − Const. (1987), art. III, sec. 2
- Rule 112, sec. 6
- b. Requisites for issuance Const. (1987), art. III, sec. 2
68. Placer v. Vill, nueva, 126