Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
This has reference to your letter dated November 29, 2006 requesting
clarification on the alleged conflicting opinion of the BIR: the one issued by the
BIR-San Pablo and the one issued by the BIR-National Office appertaining to the
same set of facts.
It is represented that Jen & Janette Junkshop (J & J for brevity), is engaged in
the business of buying scrap metal from business enterprises located within the
Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA). One of the enterprises that sells scrap
metals imposes the 12% VAT in addition to the 12% VAT which the Bureau of
Customs collects prior to the release of the same to the customs territory. In sum, J&J
is paying a total of 24% value-added tax everytime it hauls from PEZA for the same
specific items.
Thus, to clear all conflicts, and considering that J & J is an importer in this
case, the payment of the value-added tax on importation should be made by J & J
directly to the Bureau of Customs as the agency tasked to collect the VAT on
importation. Resultantly, Ibiden is not anymore required to impose VAT on every
sale of metal scrap. Ibiden, however, should be furnished a copy of the receipt of the
payment of the VAT with the Bureau of Customs.
This will be therefore serve as your authority to request Ibiden to refrain from
imposing VAT on the sale of scrap to J & J since the Bureau of Customs is also
collecting the same before the goods are purchased and released.
This ruling is being issued on the basis of the foregoing facts as represented.
However, if upon investigation, it will be disclosed that the facts are different, then
this ruling shall be considered null and void.
Copyright 2016 CD Technologies Asia, Inc. and Accesslaw, Inc. Philippine Taxation Encyclopedia First Release 2016 2