Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 6

10/9/2020 Why film and TV get Paris so wrong - BBC Culture

Home News Sport Reel Worklife Travel Future Culture M

Menu 

FILM | TELEVISION

Why film and TV get Paris so wrong

   

(Credit: Netflix)

By Addison Nugent 8th October 2020

Netflix’s Emily in Paris is the latest work to portray the French capital as a
postcard-pretty playground for an American. Where do these fantasies come from,
asks Addison Nugent.

Article continues below

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20201007-why-film-and-tv-get-paris-so-wrong 1/6
10/9/2020 Why film and TV get Paris so wrong - BBC Culture
“The best of America dris to Paris. The American in Paris is the best American,” F
Scott Fitzgerald once wrote. Aer 10 years of living as a US immigrant in the French
capital, I am still not sure exactly what he meant, but I am sure that he did not envision
Emily Cooper, the heroine of Netflix’s new show Emily in Paris.

More like this:

–      Hollywood’s smartest teen movies

–      The reality series dividing viewers

–      Ten TV shows to watch in October

Set a century aer Fitzgerald took up residence in the city of lights, Sex and the City
creator Darren Starr’s new series is the latest work to deploy the ‘American in Paris’
trope which, no matter how many attempts they make, screenwriters just can’t seem to
nail. It centres around a young US marketing consultant (played by Audrey Hepburn
lookalike, Lily Collins), sent to live in Paris aer her firm acquires a French agency.
What ensues is a parade of every Hollywood cliché about life in the French capital
imaginable, including rude chain-smoking colleagues and romance on every corner.
Watching the series’ 10 episodes I was le with the question: how is Hollywood still
getting Paris so wrong?

Netflix’s Emily in Paris focuses on a young American who moves to the French capital and lives out
her romantic fantasy – aggressive red beret and all (Credit: Netflix)

Growing up, I obsessively consumed every Hollywood film based in Paris. I sang along
with Fred Astaire as he danced down the Champs-Élysées to the tune of Bonjour Paris!
in Funny Face (1957); cried with Nicole Kidman in Moulin Rouge (2001); and gazed in
wonder at Audrey Tautou’s magical Parisian life in Amélie (2001) – which although
French, provides the kind of chocolate-box Hollywood imagining of the capital that
presumably made it a worldwide hit. In many ways, when I finally arrived in Paris at
the age of 21, beaming ear-to-ear in my first cab ride from the airport, I was a lot like
Emily Cooper who, clearly, was fed the same Hollywood myth.

In the show’s opening episodes, we see how she, like so many of us Americans before
her, is instantly deflated when confronted by the fact that Paris isn’t how it appears in
the movies. Adventure does not wait on every corner. Parisians are generally reserved
and it’s very difficult to make friends. Being an American in Paris can be extremely
lonely.

For the most part, American directors paint their depictions


of Paris and its culture through either nostalgic or rose-
coloured glasses – Dr Alice Craven
https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20201007-why-film-and-tv-get-paris-so-wrong 2/6
10/9/2020 Why film and TV get Paris so wrong - BBC Culture

However, instead of learning to adapt to the beautifully complicated if somewhat


disappointing reality of the French capital, Emily sets about obsessively moulding it to
her expectations via her Instagram account. The show’s name actually refers to Emily’s
Instagram handle, which plays a woefully central role in the series. Instead of giving her
21.7k followers (a statistic that flashes across the screen multiple times) a glimpse of the
real Paris, she filters her experience to match her American fans’ assumptions.

This could be a chance for the show to satirise the prettified American view of Paris, but
really it just plays into it; like his heroine, Starr gives us a city that is a total fantasy
world. Emily becomes an influencer, attends lavish champagne-soaked parties, and
meets hunky Parisian men at every turn. “For the most part, American directors paint
their depictions of Paris and its culture through either nostalgic or rose-coloured glasses
[...]” says Dr Alice Craven, Professor in Film Studies at The American University of
Paris. “Audiences, particularly American ones, want to relish the beauty of the city of
lights and therefore welcome the misty tints given to the city by these directors.” Again
and again, on-screen depictions of Paris, from 1995 Meg Ryan vehicle French Kiss to the
climax of Sex and the City, which saw Carrie Bradshaw find her fairytale ending there
with Mr Big, have used it as a twinkling backdrop for romantic fantasies.

But where did our rose-tinted vision of the French capital come from?

How the lie developed

It arguably stems from the interwar period when young writers, artists and
philosophers of the so-called ‘Lost Generation’ – a term coined by novelist Gertrude
Stein – flocked to Paris. In the 1920s bohemian titans like Stein, Ernest Hemingway,
Salvador Dalí, F Scott and Zelda Fitzgerald, Man Ray, TS Eliot and Jean Rhys formed a
creative coterie – partying together at jazz clubs, exchanging ideas, and generally living
the expat dream we now associate with Paris.

Many of the misconceptions about the city swirling around in the US imagination are
not really misconceptions at all – it’s just they are 100 years out of date. When
Americans hop off the plane at Charles de Gaulle, clutching a copy of Ernest
Hemingway’s A Moveable Feast, the author’s seminal memoir about his time writing
and gallivanting in the French capital in the 1920s, they may be led to expect to scribble
notes at Café de Flore, engage in tense intellectual conversations at the Place de l’Opéra,
and sip wine with the city’s literati at Les Deux Magots. 

The classic musical An American in Paris (1951) cemented Hollywood’s love affair with the French
capital (Credit: Alamy)

However as soon as they realise Café de Flore is now solely a hangout for American
tourists, Place de l’Opéra is a congested hellscape, and a bottle of wine at Les Deux
Magots costs a minimum €38 (£34.70), their Parisian dreams are shattered.

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20201007-why-film-and-tv-get-paris-so-wrong 3/6
10/9/2020 Why film and TV get Paris so wrong - BBC Culture
“Hemingway’s ‘Lost Generation’ may have come and gone, but there’s still a real 21st-
Century expat story worthy of being told,” says Vanessa Grall, founder of lifestyle
website Messy Nessy Chic and author of Don’t Be a Tourist in Paris. “The gap is wide
open for narratives that give Paris the truly breakthrough performance it deserves, but
instead, we continue to be fed ones that repeatedly stereotype the city as an Instagram
background for soul-searching fashionistas.”

This anachronistic vision of Paris is a central theme in Woody Allen’s 2011 film
Midnight in Paris in which protagonist Gil (played by Owen Wilson), a Hollywood
scriptwriter bent on becoming a serious novelist, is transported back to the Jazz Age via
a magic taxi and experiences the city as it was in the 1920s. For much of the film, Gil is
tempted to stay in the past permanently with his new literati friends (including  Stein,
Fitzgerald, Hemingway, and more) because apparently, he’d entirely forgotten about
World War Two or was willing to endure the horrors of the Nazi Occupation just to tag
along with Ernest Hemingway during his Moveable Feast days.

In the end, Gil decides to move to Paris but remain in the present. Something that he, as
a millionaire scriptwriter, can certainly afford to do, but the average writer cannot these
days, easily at least. You see, there was a reason that Hemingway could afford to rent an
apartment and an office space while sipping endless bottles of wine and slurping
oysters in Saint Germain: aer World War One, the Franc was massively devalued,
down to 25 to the dollar, so an American could live off a meagre salary and treat Paris
like a beautiful playground. This, dear reader, is no longer the case.

Emily’s outfits bear little relation to the film An American


in Paris; instead her look is very much a rich American
millennial tourist in Paris.
Paris is now a wildly expensive city, named (along with Hong Kong and Singapore) the
most expensive city in the world in 2019. Rent is astronomical, and Emily in Paris is
almost realistic in the type of housing it affords its heroine: instead of putting her in an
inexplicably gigantic flat, an estate agent announces that she will be living in the
‘servant’s quarters’: better known as chambres des bonnes, matchbox-sized flats found
on the top floor of apartment buildings where rich families’ household staff used to
reside. I have lived in more of these over-priced cupboards than I care to mention – the
walls are paper-thin, you have to go up a separate ‘servants’ staircase to get to them, and
worst of all, everyone on the floor shares a communal toilet.

Except, the cute flat with a separate bedroom and living room where Emily lives is not, I
repeat not, an authentic chambre de bonne. In fact, when the camera pans out to Emily
beaming in her window you can actually see the real chambres des bonnes located one
floor up.

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20201007-why-film-and-tv-get-paris-so-wrong 4/6
10/9/2020 Why film and TV get Paris so wrong - BBC Culture

Woody Allen’s time-travelling 2011 film Midnight in Paris knowingly riffed on the anachronistic
vision of Paris set in the cultural imagination (Credit: Alamy)

The classic Gene Kelly/Leslie Caron musical An American in Paris (1951) has the right
idea. In the film’s delightful first scene we see the camera pan up a classic Le Bank
building stopping at Kelly’s postage-stamp-sized room. We watch his wannabe artist
hero Jerry sleepily go about the process of converting his chambre de bonne from
bedroom to living room – a familiar morning ritual for everyone who has ever lived on
the dernier étage.

Patricia Field, the famed Sex and the City costume designer who once again teamed up
with Starr for Emily in Paris, has said that she was inspired by An American in Paris
when designing the costuming. However film fans will find Emily’s outfits bear little
relation to An American in Paris’ lavish costuming; instead her look is very much a rich
American millennial tourist in Paris. I cross the Pont Alexandre III (where Emily and
her colleagues film a perfume commercial seen in the show’s trailer) every day on my
way to work and if I passed Emily in her black-and-white checkered suit and aggressive
red beret, I would automatically assume her quilted Chanel bag was filled with daddy’s
credit cards. In one scene, Emily’s even wearing a buttoned shirt with the Eiffel Tower
on it that sells for a cool €333 (£304): the rich girls’ version of the ‘Paris Je t’aime’ shirts
peddled on every street corner.

From Sex and the City to Le Divorce, the 2003 Merchant Ivory comedy-drama starring
Kate Hudson and Naomi Watts, there is a penchant for costume designers to dress their
characters ‘on theme’. American on-screen heroines wear outlandish gowns, head-to-
toe Chanel, and prominent berets as they traipse through iconic le-bank locales. Paris
is, of course, a fashionable place but the choice to consistently make clothing a central
focus in American portrayals of the city points to a deeply shallow understanding of it,
as two-dimensional as Emily’s precious Instagram feed; unreal as the MGM sound
stages in Funny Face and An American in Paris.

In these films and indeed in Emily in Paris, Paris serves as nothing more than a
beautiful backdrop. Sure, the show does get a few small things right: there is dog
excrement all over the streets, a fact Emily finds out when she ruins a pair of designer
boots; the water does cut off constantly in old buildings; and the French do oen
respond with a nonplussed ‘Pas possible’ when asked to do something they would
rather not. However, just like her 2000s forebear Carrie Bradshaw, Emily does not allow
Paris or a different culture to shape her; she tries to shape it into an American
idealisation. This notion that somehow Paris is for Americans seems to be Hollywood’s
overriding message through the years – whereas if the American in Paris is really the
best American, to return to Fitzgerald, it is because they give themselves up to the city
in all its beautiful, flawed glory.

Emily in Paris is available on Netflix now

Love film and TV? Join BBC Culture Film and TV Club on Facebook, a community for
cinephiles all over the world.

If you would like to comment on this story or anything else you have seen on BBC Culture,
head over to our Facebook page or message us on Twitter.

And if you liked this story, sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter, called The
Essential List. A handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Culture, Worklife and
Travel, delivered to your inbox every Friday.

   

 SHARE

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20201007-why-film-and-tv-get-paris-so-wrong 5/6
10/9/2020 Why film and TV get Paris so wrong - BBC Culture

LOADING

Explore the BBC


Home News

Sport Reel

Worklife Travel

Future Culture

Music TV

Weather Sounds

Terms of Use About the BBC

Privacy Policy Cookies

Accessibility Help Parental Guidance

Contact the BBC Get Personalised Newsletters

Advertise with us AdChoices / Do Not Sell My Info

Copyright © 2020 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20201007-why-film-and-tv-get-paris-so-wrong 6/6

Вам также может понравиться