1
Mass
Communication:
A Critical Approach
00
“Black people, I love you. I love us. Our lives matter.” After a jury acquitted
The Evolution of Mass
Communication
George Zimmerman in the shooting death of unarmed black teen Trayvon
Martin on July 13, 2013, Alicia Garza used these words in a Facebook post
00
describing her anger and heartbreak. When Garza’s friend Patrisse Cullors
Mass Media and the Process
of Communication saw the post and shared it along with the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter,
these same words inspired a new chapter in civil rights activism: Garza and
00
How We Study the Media
Cullors brought in friend Opal Tometi, and the three women, all in their late
twenties or early thirties, cofounded the Black Lives Matter movement.1
00
A Closer Look at the The organization built an online presence using the hashtag
Cultural Model: Surveying
#BlackLivesMatter on social media sites such as Twitter and Tumblr as
the Cultural Landscape
a way to connect people and share information (including videos) about
00
violence against black men and women—especially by police. Following
A Closer Look at the Social
Scientific Model: Gathering
the shooting death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, in 2014, the
Data “hashtag activism” of the Black Lives Matter movement moved offline
as more than five hundred people descended on Ferguson to protest the
00
Critiquing Media shooting. By the close of 2016, there were thirty-eight Black Lives Matter
local chapters.
◀ #BlackLivesMatter grew from a social media hashtag into an international movement that emphasizes both online and in-person
activism. Credit to come
3
and what these changes might mean for the present and future are all ideas
that we consider in mass communication research.
Thinking about these ideas can generate many compelling questions. For ex-
ample, how do media both reflect and shape society? Who owns and controls the
different parts of the mass media? What responsibilities do the owners of mass
media corporations have to the public? What responsibilities do we, as members
of the public, have in the way we use mass media? Do digital developments like
social media and online streaming of music and video represent uncharted media
territory, an extension of existing media forms, or both? In this book, we take up
these questions and many more by examining the history and business of mass
media as well as scholarly research into how media and people interact.
At their best, media, in all their forms, try to help us understand the events and
trends affecting us. At their worst, they can erode the quality of our lives in numer-
ous ways. For one thing, media’s appetite for telling and selling stories can lead
them to misrepresent those events or exploit them (and the people they most
affect) for profit. Many critics disapprove of how media—particularly TV, cable, and
web sites and social media outlets—seem to hurtle from one event to another, of-
ten dwelling on trivial, celebrity-driven content rather than on meaningful analysis
of more important events. Critics also fault media for failing to fulfill their respon-
sibility as a watchdog for democracy—which sometimes calls for challenging our
leaders and questioning their actions. Finally, the formation and growth of media
industries, commercial culture, and new technologies—smartphones, laptop com-
puters, digital television—have some critics worrying that we are now spending
more time consuming media than interacting with one another.
Like anything else, mass media have their good sides and bad sides, their
useful effects and destructive ones. And that’s why it is so important for us to
acquire media literacy—an understanding of the media that are powerfully
shaping our world (and being shaped by it). Only by being media literate can we
have a say in the roles that media play around us.
In this chapter, we will take steps to strengthen that literacy by:
• exploring ways of critiquing the mass media, and reflecting on the impor-
tance of doing so
Consider, for example, that a smartphone that fits into the palm
of a person’s hand offers every earlier form of communication
anywhere there is a Wi-Fi or cellular signal. One could use the phone
to initiate a call or video chat (oral communication), send a text or an
e-mail (written communication), read a book (print communication),
watch a television program on a service like Hulu (electronic
communication), and then send a tweet about the program (digital
communication). As shown throughout this book, older forms of
communication don’t go away but are adapted and converged, or
joined together, with newer forms and technologies.
Resistance to Authority
Since mass-produced printed materials could spread information and ideas
faster and farther than ever before, writers could use print to disseminate
views that challenged traditional civic doctrine and religious authority. This
paved the way for major social and cultural changes, such as the Protestant
Reformation and the rise of modern nationalism. People who read contradictory
views began resisting traditional clerical authority. With easier access to infor-
mation about events in nearby places, people also began seeing themselves
not merely as members of families, isolated communities, or tribes but as par-
ticipants in larger social units—nation-states—whose interests were broader
than local or regional concerns.
Spreading Literacy
Although print media secured authority figures’ power, the mass publication of
pamphlets, magazines, and books also began democratizing knowledge—making
Focus on Individualism
The print revolution also nourished the idea of individualism.
People came to rely less on their local community and their
commercial, religious, and political leaders for guidance on
how to live their lives. Instead, they read various ideas and
arguments, and came up with their own answers to life’s great
questions. By the mid-nineteenth century, individualism had
spread into the realm of commerce. There, it took the form
of increased resistance to government interference in the
affairs of self-reliant entrepreneurs. Over the next century,
individualism became a fundamental value in American society.
Media Convergence
Although it has its roots in the electronic era, the phenomenon of media
convergence is one of the defining characteristics of the digital turn. This
term has two very different meanings. According to one meaning, media
convergence is the technological merging of content in different mass media.
For example, magazine articles and radio programs are also accessible on the
Internet; and songs, TV shows, and movies are now available on computers,
iPods, and cell phones.
Such technological convergence is not entirely new. For instance, in the late
1920s, the Radio Corporation of America (RCA) purchased the Victor Talking
Machine Company and introduced machines that could play both
radio and recorded music. However, contemporary media convergence is much
broader because it involves digital content across a wider array of media.
The term media convergence can also be used to describe a particular
business model in which a company consolidates various media holdings—
such as cable connections, phone services, television transmissions, and
Internet access—under one corporate umbrella. The goal of such consolidation
is not necessarily to offer consumers more choices in their media but to
better manage resources, lower costs,
and maximize profits. For example, a
company that owns TV stations, radio
outlets, and newspapers in multiple
markets—as well as in the same cities—
can deploy one reporter or producer to
create three or four versions of the same
story for various media outlets. Thus, the
company can employ fewer people than
if it owned only one media outlet.
Although it’s easy to see how a con-
verged business model benefits media
owners—more profits to those companies
that downsize their workforce while in-
creasing their media holdings in a variety
of markets—this model presents some
disadvantages for society. For one thing, it
limits the range of perspectives from which
messages are delivered, as media content ▲The convergence of online
becomes concentrated in fewer hands. media into one simple device
is still a new media concept for
In every chapter in this book, we will discuss how both kinds of conver- many people—an enormous
gence have changed the way mass media work and how we use each medium. shift from the multiple
single-purpose devices most
For example, in later chapters we will see that the music industry is still coming Americans grew up with.
to grips with digital downloading, streaming music services, and online radio; Tony Cenicola/The New York Times/
Redux Pictures
that convergence and other factors of the digital turn played a key role in dam-
aging the business model of traditional news media, resulting in massive news-
room cuts across the country; and that online piracy and copyright infringement
remain major challenges for large music and movie companies.
13
Today, we still debate these sorts of questions. At the turn of the twentieth
century, for example, newly arrived immigrants to the United States who
spoke little English gravitated toward vaudeville shows and silent films, which
they could enjoy without having to understand English. These popular events
occasionally became a flash point for some groups. For example, the Daughters
of the American Revolution, local politicians, religious leaders, and police vice
squads feared that these “low” cultural forms would undermine what they saw
as traditional American values.
Today, with the reach of print, electronic, and digital communications and
the amount of time people spend consuming them (see Figure 1.1), mass
media now play an even more controversial role in society. For instance,
some people are frustrated by the overwhelming amount of information
available. Others decry what they view as mass media’s overly commercial
and sensationalistic quality. In their view, too many talk shows exploit personal
problems for commercial gain, and too many TV shows and video games
feature graphic violence.
People also keep grappling with the dual question, To what extent do mass
media shape our values and behaviors, and to what extent do our values and
behaviors shape the media? Researchers have continued searching for answers
to this question. For example, some have designed studies to determine whether
watching violent TV shows makes viewers more likely to commit violent acts.
Magazines
1.7%
Other
Newspapers 3.0%
2.2%
Other connected TV
devices 33.8%
3.6%
Radio
12.0%
Online (laptop
and desktop)
18.0%
Mobile (nonvoice)
25.7%
Data from: “Average Time Spent with Major Media per Day in the United States as of April 2016 (in Minutes),” http://
www.statista.com/statistics/276683/media-use-in-the-us/.
▲By analyzing news coverage of such tragedies as the mass shooting in an Orlando nightclub in
2016, the cultural model shows how media content shapes attitudes and beliefs. These in turn play a
role in the ongoing political debate over issues such as gun control. Credit to come
As cultural forms, the media help us make sense of daily life and articulate
our values. When we listen to music, read a book, watch television, or scan the
Internet, we assign meaning to that song, book, TV program, or Web site. And
different people often assign different meanings to the same media content.
Take the Harry Potter book series. Some readers see the series as an innocent
coming-of-age children’s story. Others interpret it as more adult literature,
containing pointed metaphors about good and evil that parallel current political
events. Still others construe the series as a tool for luring children into a life
of witchcraft. And there are others who use the books as a form of creative
entertainment, inventing Harry Potter parodies in almost every imaginable
media form.
We describe this model for understanding media content as cultural
because it recognizes that individuals assign diverse meanings to messages
depending on personal characteristics, such as gender, age, educational level,
ethnicity, occupation, and religious beliefs. According to this model, audiences
actively affirm, interpret, refashion, select, or reject the messages flowing
through various media channels. One manifestation of this active audience in
the digital age is the Internet meme. Coined by British evolutionary biologist
Richard Dawkins, the term meme has come to mean a digital experience—a
video, a sound recording, even just a catchphrase—that is passed electronically
from one consumer to another—sometimes with new variations (remakes,
remixes, mash-ups, and so forth)—often very quickly. This widespread, rapid
transmission is frequently referred to as viral and includes brief cultural
touchstones, such as an image of actor Sean Bean from the HBO series Game
of Thrones paired with the catchphrase “Brace Yourself, Winter Is Coming,”
modified by users in literally hundreds of ways. Unlike network celebrities and
corporate brands, the meme is a product of an interactive culture in dialogue
with itself.
make these
Thus, the cultural approach to studying the media critically analyzes
two 1
media content, the ways in which audiences interpret that content, parand the
circumstances of how the media produce such content.
This form of research also considers the role of power in mass media. For
example, it might evaluate which groups have more or less ability to get their
messages heard and seen, and how that translates into financial, political, and
cultural rewards.
and reason and viewing the world as a rational place. In this orderly place,
tific knowledge, there seem to be fewer qualms about using the latest technol-
ogy, such as computers and smartphones.
and count the content of various types of media. For instance, they total
up the number of news stories that contain specific types of information
regarding the topic in question (such as how to prevent cancer), count song
lyrics containing references to a topic (e.g., sex), or total up the number
of occurrences of certain behaviors (e.g., violent acts) shown in a set of
movies.
But content analysis is only one way to gather data using the social
science approach. Researchers also conduct experiments using randomly
assigned subjects (college students are popular test subjects) to test
people’s self-reported recall of or reactions to media content. To illustrate,
experimenters might use devices such as eye trackers to record what part
of a page or screen each viewer is watching.8 As noted earlier in the chapter,
social science researchers can also gather data through surveys they’ve
designed or use data from the many surveys the federal government funds
and makes available.
Critiquing Media
To acquire media literacy, we can read the findings of cultural
and social science researchers who have studied various aspects
of the media. However, both models have their limits; thus, it’s
important to view their conclusions with a critical eye. We can
also learn to critique media content ourselves in a methodical,
disciplined way. Whatever approach we use to develop media
literacy, it’s helpful to always keep in mind the benefits of a
critical perspective.
obsession with what celebrities look like at the beach. In each case, we
will need to thoroughly familiarize ourselves with the show, program, or
magazines in question and start thinking about what messages they seem
to be conveying. As we begin this process, we will also need to transcend
our own preferences and biases. For instance, we may like or dislike hip-
hop, R&B, pop music, or country, but if we want to criticize the messages
in one or more of these musical genres intelligently, we need to understand
what they have to say and consider why their messages appeal to particular
audiences.
Familiarization and a certain amount of self-conscious detachment, then,
are the preliminaries of a rigorous process that moves beyond matters of
taste or, worse, a cynical, wholesale dismissal of culturally significant ex-
periences. Becoming truly media literate requires mastering this critical
process and applying it to everyday encounters with the communication
media. The process encompasses five steps: Description, Analysis, Interpre-
tation, Evaluation, and Engagement (see “The Critical Process behind Media
Literacy” on page 00).
26
of the rifle with the large tagline “Consider Your use a weapon, and if so, under what circumstances?
Man Card Reissued.” The Bushmaster was the How are women represented in this movie, and how
same civilian assault rifle used by the shooter who does the hero treat them?
massacred twenty-eight people at the Newtown
INTERPRETATION Does your analysis of the hero’s
elementary school in 2012.
behavior support or contradict the idea that masculinity is
How do we find a way out of this cultural cy-
defined in the ways described in this case study?
cle? “Make gender—specifically the idea that men
are gendered beings—a central part of the national
EVALUATION Lists of top “guy movies” tend to
conversation about rampage killings,” Katz says.
reflect the characteristics of what an ideal manly hero
“It means looking carefully at how our culture de-
should look and act like. What does this suggest about
fines manhood, how boys are socialized, and how
how the lists’ creators define what it means to be mas-
pressure to stay in the ‘man box’ not only con-
culine? Is there much variation in how masculinity is
strains boys’ and men’s emotional and relational
portrayed from movie to movie (to the extent that you are
development, but also their range of choices when
familiar with these movies or can look up plot summaries
faced with life crises.”5
online)? What might the portrayal of women in “guy mov-
ies” tell us about how the ideal manly type is “supposed”
APPLYING THE CRITICAL PROCESS to interact with women?
27
28
we consume; what messages we draw from those media; and how those
messages affect our actions, the quality of our lives, and the health of our
democracy. We also need to ask questions, such as the following:
• Why might some people continue clinging to either/or thinking about media
(such as high-brow versus low-brow books or movies) when so many boundar-
ies in our society have blurred? Does this either/or thinking reflect a desire to
keep people in their “proper” socioeconomic class?
• What does it mean that public debate and news about everyday life now
seem more likely to come from Facebook, John Oliver, or bloggers than
from the New York Times or the NBC Nightly News?9 Can we no longer
distinguish real news from entertainment? If so, does this affect how
well informed we are?
• How can we hone our awareness of the economic interests fueling the
30
• Social scientists use content analysis to gather 3. What are the hallmarks of the digital turn, and
data—they code and count the content of vari- what makes it different from earlier stages of
ous types of media. They also conduct experi- mass media development?
ments to generate data, and gather data through
surveys. 4. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the
skyscraper and map models of culture?
• Citizens can examine the findings of cultural and
social scientific research on media to follow a 5. How might we tell whether a piece of media
critical process, which consists of describing, research comes from someone working under
analyzing, interpreting, evaluating, and engaging the cultural or the social scientific model?
31