Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
No. 10-3000
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
vs.
Defendant-Appellants.
__________________
Appellants Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ and Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, hereinafter
"Appellants" respectfully request this honorable court to take judicial notice of the
2. 12.23.10 Order by Judge Robreno denying Appellees' request for TRO against
the fact that the Appellee Lisa Liberi is still on probation under the supervision of
These documents are relevant to the determination of the current appeal for
following reasons:
Above document was obtained recently from the court reporter. It is relevant to the
current Appeal. Appellants are stating that Judge Robreno has assumed jurisdiction
over this case in error, based on fraudulent statements by Appellee Lisa Liberi.
Judge Robreno erroneously decided that there is diversity in this case, stating in his
order that Liberi is a resident of PA. In her prior pleadings Liberi claimed that she
is not a convicted forger from CA, that she is a different person. She gave her
Attorney Philip J Berg's business address as her address and based on that he ruled
that she is a resident of PA and the case can proceed in diversity. During the
12.20.2010 hearing Liberi admitted that she is indeed a convicted felon from CA,
that she was convicted recently, in 2008. Taitz submitted a copy of Liberi's
criminal conviction and terms of probation, showing that she is not allowed to live
in any other state but CA or NM. As such, an order by Judge Robreno was made in
error. It needs to be reversed and the case needs to be dismissed due to lack of
B. Order by Judge Robreno, denying Appellee's request for TRO is relevant to the
1. Judge Robreno states in the order that Liberi conceded to the fact that she indeed
Judge Robreno found no evidence of any crimes and denied the TRO motion
3. Judge Robreno found Appellees Liberi, Ostella and Berg to be evasive and not
appeal.
felon Lisa Liberi, showing that she is not allowed to reside in any other state, but
CA and NM, is brought with a proper purpose of showing that coupled with
Liberi's admission, she cannot be a resident of PA and that District Judge Eduardo
D. Letter from the District Attorney of San Bernardino County, CA was brought
with the proper purpose of showing that Appellee Lisa Liberi is in fact still on
be held shortly on 02.23.2011 and it makes his further representation of the parties
SUMMARY
Due to all of the above the Appellants request judicial notice of the above
documents.
01.30.2011
duly licensed with this court as well as the Supreme Court of CA, Supreme Court
I am over 18 years old, do not suffer from any mental impairment and have a
1. Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the transcript of the 12.20.2010 hearing in
reporter.
2. Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of the order by judge Robreno in Liberi v
Taitz 09-1898 which was posted on the electronic docket and available on pacer.
Appellee in this case Lisa Liberi is a true and correct copy of such summary posted
4. Letter of the District Attorney of the San Bernardino County Ca, attesting to
Liberi's current probation status is a true and correct copy of such letter sent to me
Philip J. Berg is a true and correct copy of such announcement posted on the web
I certify under penalty of perjury and under the laws of the state of CA that all
01.30.2011
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above pleadings
was served by ECF on 01.31.2011 on the following parties:
Neil Sankey
The Sankey Firm, Inc. a/k/a The Sankey Firm
Sankey Investigations, Inc.
2470 Stearns Street #162
Simi Valley, CA 93063
Phone: (805) 520_3151and (818) 366_0919
Cell Phone: (818) 212_7615
FAX: (805) 520_5804 and (818) 366_1491
Email: nsankey@thesankeyfirm.com
Ed Hale
Caren Hale
Plains Radio
KPRN
Bar H Farms
1401 Bowie Street
Wellington, Texas 79095
Phone: (806) 447_0010 and (806) 447_0270
Email: plains.radio@yahoo.com and
Email: barhfarms@gmail.com and ed@barhfarms.net