Former Imperial Laundry Investigation Exhibit A - Maxie

FORMER IMPERIAL LAUNDRY INVESTIGATION
1802 EAST CALIFORNIA AVENUE

FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
KLEINFELDER PROJECT # 20203368.001A
MAY 15, 2020
Copyright 2020 Kleinfelder

All Rights Reserved
ONLY THE CLIENT OR ITS DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES MAY USE THIS DOCUMENT AND ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC
PROJECT FOR WHICH THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED.
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page i of iv May 15, 2020

© 2020 Kleinfelder www.kleinfelder.com
A Report Prepared for:
Ms. Kristina Chamberlin

City of Fresno – PARCS Department
1515 East Divisadero Street
Fresno, CA 93721
FORMER IMPERIAL LAUNDRY INVESTIGATION

1802 EAST CALIFORNIA AVENUE
FRENSO, CA 93706
Prepared by:
Stacy Mann
Staff Toxicologist
Reviewed by:
William F. Schmierer, PG
Project Geologist
KLEINFELDER
2882 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Phone: 916.366.1701
May 15, 2020

Kleinfelder Project No.: 20203368.001A
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page ii of iv May 15, 2020

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1
2 SITE BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................... 2
3 PRE FIELD INVESTIGATION .......................................................................................... 3

3.1 PERMIT ................................................................................................................. 3
3.2 UTILITY CLEARANCE .......................................................................................... 3
4 GROUNDWATER WELL INSTALLATION AND SAMPLING .......................................... 4

4.1 GROUNDWATER WELL LOCATION ................................................................... 4
4.2 DRILLING METHOD ............................................................................................. 4
4.3 WELL INSTALLATION .......................................................................................... 4
4.4 WELL SURVEYING .............................................................................................. 5
4.5 WELL SAMPLING ................................................................................................. 5
4.6 SOIL CUTTINGS, DECON/PURGE WATER ........................................................ 5
4.7 LABORATORY ANALYSES .................................................................................. 6
5 SOIL SAMPLING .............................................................................................................. 7

5.1 SOIL BORING LOCATIONS ................................................................................. 7
5.2 DRILLING METHOD ............................................................................................. 7
5.3 SOIL BORING LOCATION SURVEYING.............................................................. 7
5.4 SOIL BORING SAMPLING.................................................................................... 8
5.5 SOIL CUTTINGS AND BORING DESTRUCTION ................................................ 8
5.6 LABORATORY ANALYSES .................................................................................. 8
6 VMP INSTALLATION AND SAMPLING .......................................................................... 9

6.1 VAPOR MONITORING POINT LOCATIONS ........................................................ 9
6.2 DRILLING METHOD ............................................................................................. 9
6.3 VMP INSTALLATION .......................................................................................... 10
6.4 VMP SURVEYING .............................................................................................. 10
6.5 VMP SAMPLING ................................................................................................. 10
6.6 LABORATORY ANALYSES ................................................................................ 11
7 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ....................................................................................... 12

7.1 GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS ........................................................................ 12
7.2 GROUNDWATER RESULTS .............................................................................. 12
7.3 SOIL SAMPLE RESULTS ................................................................................... 13
7.4 SOIL VAPOR RESULTS ..................................................................................... 14
7.5 INVESTIGATION DERIVED WASTE .................................................................. 16
8 SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 17
9 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................... 19
10 LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................. 20
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page iii of iv May 15, 2020

REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................... 22
FIGURES
1 Site Location Map

2 Historical Valley Gas and Imperial Laundry PCE and TCE Concentrations in
Groundwater
3 Historical Valley Gas and Imperial Laundry MTBE, Gasoline, and BTEX Concentrations
in Groundwater
4 Soil TPH Concentrations
5 Soil – Select VOC Concentrations
6 Soil Vapor – Select Shallow Chlorinated VOC Concentrations
7 Soil Vapor – Select Shallow VOC Concentrations
8 Soil Vapor – Select Deep Chlorinated VOC Concentrations
9 Soil Vapor – Select Deep VOC Concentrations
10 Groundwater Elevation Contour Map
TABLE
1 Well Construction Details and Water Level Measurements

2 Soil Boring and Vapor Monitoring Point Survey Data
3 Select Groundwater Analytical Results
4 Soil TPH Analytical Results
5 Select Soil VOC Analytical Results
6 Select Soil Vapor Analytical Results
APPENDICES
A City of Fresno Monitoring Well Permit

B Groundwater Sampling Field Sheets
C VMP Construction and Boring Logs
D Soil Vapor Field Sheets
E Laboratory Analytical Results
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page iv of iv May 15, 2020

1 INTRODUCTION
___________________________________________________________________________________
This report documents an investigation of the Former Imperial Laundry, previously located at
2165 South Elm Avenue in Fresno, California. The property on which the former laundry is
located has been redeveloped and is currently occupied by the City of Fresno PARCS
department Maxie L. Parks Community Center land (Community Center), located at 1802 East
California Avenue in Fresno, California (Site). This investigation has been performed to evaluate
groundwater, soil, and soil vapor for the presence of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). The
investigation was performed consistent with the Workplan for Site Assessment, City of Fresno –
PARCS Department Property 2165 South Elm Street, Fresno, California 93706 (Krazan,
Associates, Inc. [Krazan] 2019) (Work Plan). The Site location is shown on Figure 1.
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 1 of 22 May 15, 2020

2 SITE BACKGROUND
___________________________________________________________________________________
The Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) issued a Request for
Investigation of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil and Groundwater in a letter dated May 1,
2019 to the City of Fresno requesting investigation of the Site (CVRWQCB. 2019a). The request
for investigation was triggered by the presence of tetrachloroethene (PCE) detected in the
groundwater monitoring well network of the adjacent Valley Gas release site.
Krazan prepared the Work Plan dated July 23, 2019 to address the CVRWQCB’s request for an
investigation. The CVRWQCB approved the Work Plan in a letter dated September 23, 2019
(CVRWQCB. 2019b). This investigation report documents the implementation and results of the
July 2019 Work Plan.
The Site consists of the current Maxie L. Park Community Center and an adjacent park with
grass, play structures, and community gardens. The Community Center is comprised of one
large building with the interior divided into multiple sections including: a gymnasium (basketball
court); private offices; locker-rooms; storage areas; kitchen; and, classrooms.
Historical records indicate that a dry-cleaning facility formerly operated on the Site just south of
the location of the current Community Center. Based on the review of Sanborn Fire Insurance
Maps (Sanborn Maps) and Polk Guide directories of Fresno businesses and residences, a dry
cleaning facility is shown at the Site on a 1958 Sanborn Map and laundry and/or cleaning
businesses are listed in the Polk Guides between 1959 and 1965 (CVRWQCB, 2019a). The
Former Imperial Cleaners was previously located at 2165 South Elm Avenue and is a potential
source of vapor intrusion. The Former Imperial Cleaners property is now a part of the
Community Center property. Elevated concentrations of PCE have been detected in the
groundwater monitoring network associated with the adjacent gas station located at 2139 East
Elm Avenue (Valley Gas), approximately 250 feet northwest of the former dry cleaning facility
(Figures 2 and 3).
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 2 of 22 May 15, 2020

3 PRE FIELD INVESTIGATION
___________________________________________________________________________________
3.1 PERMIT
Prior to beginning the investigation, a monitoring well permit was applied for and issued by the
City of Fresno. The permit is included as Appendix A.
3.2 UTILITY CLEARANCE
Prior to conducting the field work, the groundwater monitoring well location, soil boring
locations, and vapor monitoring probe (VMP) locations were marked with white paint, and
Underground Service Alert (USA) was notified. A subcontracted private utility locator was also
used to clear each location to avoid damaging underground utilities. In addition, all borings
were hand augered to at least five feet below ground surface (bgs) for utility clearance.
Additionally, the private utility locator scanned the area with ground penetrating radar in attempt
to find an abandoned sanitary sewer line running north and south through the Site. The utility
locator could not locate the abandoned sanitary sewer line.
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 3 of 22 May 15, 2020

4 GROUNDWATER WELL INSTALLATION AND SAMPLING
___________________________________________________________________________________
4.1 GROUNDWATER WELL LOCATION
One groundwater monitoring well (IL-MW-1) was drilled, installed, and developed at the Site
from February 18 through 21, 2020. The location of the well was placed at the location
proposed in the Work Plan. The groundwater well location is shown on Figures 2 and 3.
Monitoring well IL-MW-1 was installed outside the approximate footprint of the former dry
cleaner and at an estimated downgradient location from the former dry cleaner. Groundwater
within the vicinity of the Site has varied historically from approximately 90 feet bgs to
approximately 100 feet bgs, based on water levels collected at the adjacent Valley Gas facility.
Based on the Work Plan, the monitoring well was screened from 85 feet bgs to 120 feet bgs.
4.2 DRILLING METHOD
Subsequent to hand auger clearance of the upper 5 feet of the borehole, the boring was
advanced using a Geoprobe rig, and continuously cored from 10 to 40 feet bgs. Select soil
samples were retained from this interval. The borehole was then over-drilled to 120 feet bgs
using a CME-55 truck-mounted drill rig utilizing 8-inch diameter hollow stem augers, operated
by Geo-Ex Subsurface Exploration (Geo-Ex).
4.3 WELL INSTALLATION
The groundwater monitoring well was constructed utilizing 2-inch diameter Schedule 40
polyvinyl chloride (PVC) well casing and screen. The screened interval consisted of 35 feet of
0.010-inch-diameter slotted screen emplaced from 85 to 120 feet bgs. A 6-inch long threaded
cap was attached to the bottom of the well screen and placed at a depth of approximately 121
feet bgs. A sand pack consisting of rounded, washed, bagged #2/12 Monterey sand was placed
into the annular space to a depth of approximately 4 feet above the screened interval. A 3-foot
thick seal, consisting of hydrated bentonite pellets was placed above the filter pack. The
remaining annular space of the well was filled with a 6-sack sand cement slurry by use of tremie
pipe. A flush-mounted, traffic-rated well vault was installed to provide access to the well head.
The well vault was set at existing Site grade.
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 4 of 22 May 15, 2020

Approximately 48 hours following the drilling of the monitoring well, the well was developed
using a small diameter low-flow electric-powered submersible pump and a surge block/bailer.
The development was conducted until the well produced a relatively sand-free, low-turbidity
groundwater. The low-flow pump extracted groundwater at a rate of approximately 1 gallon per
minute, and a total of approximately 95 gallons of water was pumped in order to obtain a
turbidity test reading of 4.86 NTU (Nephelometric Turbidity Unit). Groundwater generated
during the well development was stored in labeled 55-gallon drums and staged on Site.
4.4 WELL SURVEYING
The installed on-Site well and monitoring wells associated with the adjacent Valley Gas Release
Site wells were surveyed by Morrow Surveying on February 24, 2020. Valley Gas wells MW-7
and MW-8 were not surveyed due to inaccessibility during surveying. Access was not granted to
MW-7 due to its location on private property, and a car was parked on MW-8. Well construction
details and surveyed coordinates are presented in Table 1. Valley Gas wells were surveyed as
well as the new Imperial Laundry well for consistency to measure groundwater flow direction
and gradient.
4.5 WELL SAMPLING
Groundwater elevations were measured by Kleinfelder prior to collecting samples on February

24, 2020. Groundwater samples were collected from IL-MW-1 a minimum of 48-hours after well
development. Sampling was performed by Confluence Environmental on February 24, 2020.
The monitoring well was purged using a truck-mounted pump and approximately three well
casing volumes (approximately 12.5 gallons) were purged from the monitoring well. The
groundwater samples were collected in laboratory provided bottles following the well purging.
Groundwater field data sheets are included as Appendix B.
4.6 SOIL CUTTINGS, DECON/PURGE WATER
All soil cuttings and purged groundwater produced during the drilling, installation, development,
and sampling of the groundwater monitoring well were placed in labeled 55-gallon drums and
staged on Site for analytical testing and future disposal.
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 5 of 22 May 15, 2020

4.7 LABORATORY ANALYSES
The IL-MW-1 soil and groundwater samples were submitted to APPL Labs of Clovis, California
for analysis of total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) diesel and motor oil by United States
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Method 8015B and TPH as gasoline and VOCs by
USEPA Method 8260B.
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 6 of 22 May 15, 2020

5 SOIL SAMPLING
___________________________________________________________________________________
5.1 SOIL BORING LOCATIONS
Six soil borings were drilled at the Site on February 19, 2020. The locations of the soil borings
were drilled in the locations proposed in the Work Plan. These locations were chosen relative to
the approximate location of the former dry cleaner and along the approximate location of an
abandoned sanitary sewer line. The soil boring locations are shown on Figures 4 and 5. Boring
IL-MW-1 was performed outside the approximate footprint of the former dry cleaner. Borings
SB-1 and SB-2 were performed inside the approximate footprint of the former dry cleaner.
Borings SB-3, SB-4, and SB-5 were drilled along the approximate location of an abandoned
sanitary sewer line.
5.2 DRILLING METHOD
Soil boring IL-MW-1 was hand augered to a depth of approximately 5 feet bgs to clear any
underground utilities. The borehole was then advanced to a depth of 40 feet bgs using a direct-
push, track-mounted Geoprobe 7822DT operated by Geo-Ex. The boring was further advanced
using a CME-55 truck-mounted drill rig utilizing 8-inch diameter hollow stem augers operated by
Geo-Ex. This boring was drilled to a depth of approximately 120 feet bgs for the purposes of
installing a monitoring well. Soil borings SB-1 through SB-5 were hand augered to a depth of
approximately 3.5 to 5 feet bgs due to refusal of cemented soils. These borings were further
advanced with a direct-push, track-mounted Geoprobe 7822DT operated by Geo-Ex. Soil
borings SB-1 and SB-2 were advanced to 40 feet bgs. Soil borings SB-3, SB-4, and SB-5 were
advanced to a depth of 10 feet bgs pursuant to the Work Plan. Boring logs and well
construction details are included as Appendix C.
5.3 SOIL BORING LOCATION SURVEYING
The soil boring locations were surveyed by Morrow Surveying on February 24, 2020. Soil boring
survey coordinates are presented in Table 2.
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 7 of 22 May 15, 2020

5.4 SOIL BORING SAMPLING
Soil samples were collected in 5-foot intervals from a depth of 5 feet bgs to a depth of 40 feet
bgs at locations IL-MW-1, SB-1, and SB-2. Soil samples were collected at depths of 5 and 10
feet bgs in soil borings SB-3 through SB-5. Samples were collected in 1.25-inch OD acrylic
sampling tube. The 5-foot samples were collected, capped, and stored until the entire boring
was completed. Upon completion of the boring, samples were split open and photo ionization
detector (PID) readings of the soil were recorded. The soils were also logged in accordance
with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) and recorded by a Kleinfelder staff engineer.
Based on the PID readings, two samples were retained from each soil boring and submitted for
laboratory analytical testing.
5.5 SOIL CUTTINGS AND BORING DESTRUCTION
All soil cuttings produced during the drilling and sampling of the soil borings were placed in
labeled 55-gallon drums and staged on Site for analytical testing and future disposal. Soil
borings SB-1 through SB-5 were backfilled with a neat cement grout via tremie pipe to the
ground surface in accordance with City of Fresno.
The soil samples were submitted to APPL Labs of Clovis, California for analysis of total
petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) diesel and motor oil by USEPA Method 8015B, TPH gasoline by
USEPA Method 8260B Modified, and VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B.
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 8 of 22 May 15, 2020

6 VMP INSTALLATION AND SAMPLING
___________________________________________________________________________________
To evaluate impacts to shallow soil gas, six VMPs (VMP-1 through VMP-6) were installed and
sampled. VMPs were installed on February 19, 2020. VMPs were sampled on February 24 and
25, 2020. VMP samples were analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method TO-15 and for helium (leak
check) using the Modified ASTM D-1946 method.
6.1 VAPOR MONITORING POINT LOCATIONS
Nine VMP samples were collected at six total locations at the Site on February 24 and 25, 2020.
The locations were chosen based on the proposed locations in the Work Plan. Locations VMP-
1, VMP-2, VMP-5, and VMP-6 were outside of the approximate footprint of the former dry
cleaner. Locations VMP-3 and VMP-4 are inside of the approximate footprint of the former dry
cleaner. VMP locations are shown in Figures 6 through 9.
Sample depth rationale for the VMP samples are stated below. Due to the encountered hardpan
layer from approximately four to 12 feet, depths of the vapor monitoring points were modified
from the proposed depths in the Work Plan.
• Dual completion sample points were installed at VMP-1, VMP-2, VMP-4, and VMP-6 at
depths above 5 feet bgs (shallow) and at approximately 15 feet bgs (deep). The shallow
sample was placed above 5 feet bgs in these locations due to cemented soils,
“hardpan,” from a depth of approximately 5 to 10 feet bgs. The deep soil vapor probes
were installed at approximately 15 feet bgs or refusal. VMP-4 was moved from the
proposed location in the Work Plan, slightly to the east, to align with the impacts to soil
observed in SB-2.
• Sample points below 5 feet bgs were not installed at VMP-3 and VMP-5 due to low PID
readings from nearby soil borings.
6.2 DRILLING METHOD
The VMP soil borings were installed using a Geoprobe 7822DT, operated by Geo-Ex.
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 9 of 22 May 15, 2020

6.3 VMP INSTALLATION
Stainless steel mesh screens measuring ½” OD x ½” long were installed at shallow depths
ranging from approximately 3.25 to 4.75 feet bgs at each of the six VMP locations and deep
depths ranging from approximately 14.5 to 15.5 feet bgs at locations VMP-1, VMP-2, VMP-4,
and VMP-6. The screens were compression fit to nylaflow tubing (¼” O.D. x 0.17” ID), extending
above the ground surface. The above ground tubing was coiled up and the hole was completed
in a 6” diameter hole filled with sand from 0 to 6 inches bgs. A new compression plastic valve
and hose barb assembly was fitted to each VMP to facilitate later sampling. The VMP
construction details are presented on the boring logs provided in Appendix C. The VMPs were
left in place for future sample.
6.4 VMP SURVEYING
The VMP locations were surveyed by Morrow Surveying on February 24, 2020. Survey
coordinates and elevations are presented in Table 2.
6.5 VMP SAMPLING
Soil vapor samples were collected from the VMPs pursuant to the Advisory – Active Soil Gas
Investigations (California Environmental Protection Agency [Cal/EPA] et al, 2015), a minimum of
48-hours after installation. Sampling was performed by Confluence Environmental on February
24 and 25, 2020. All VMP locations were purged prior to sampling from approximately 8
minutes to 18 minutes depending on the VMP construction details. at a flow rate of
approximately 150 to 200 milliliters per minute (mL/min). Once purged, a one-liter Summa
canister was connected to a flow regulator in order to collect the vapor samples. A shut-in test
was performed to detect any leaks in the sampling set-up and was performed for approximately
one minute. Additionally, a helium shroud was placed over the entire sampling set up and a
helium monitor was continuously run during the sampling process to detect any additional leaks.
Sample times consisted of approximately 5 minutes to collect the vapor samples. The samples
were collected at a rate of 200 mL/min, which reduced the Summa canister pressures from
approximately -27.5 to -30 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) down to -4.9 to -6 mmHg. Soil Vapor
field data sheets are included as Appendix D.
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 10 of 22 May 15, 2020

The VMP samples was submitted to Eurofins Air Toxics of Folsom, California for analysis of
VOCs by USEPA Method TO-15.
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 11 of 22 May 15, 2020

7 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
___________________________________________________________________________________
Analytical results for groundwater, soil, and soil vapor samples are discussed in the subsections
below. Soil and soil vapor results were compared to Department of Toxic Substance Control
(DTSC) Screening Levels (DTSC-SLs) (DTSC, 2019). If there was no DTSC SL for that analyte,
it was then compared to USEPA Screening Levels (USEPA RSLs) (USEPA, 2019).
Groundwater results were compared to California Health & Safety Code §116365 Maximum
Contaminant Levels (MCLs). If there was not a California MCL for that analyte, it was then
compared to San Francisco Board Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFBRWQCB)
Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) (SFBRWQCB, 2019).
Analytical laboratory results are included as Appendix E.
7.1 GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS
Groundwater elevations are presented in Table 2 and shown on Figure 10. Groundwater flow
direction is generally to the north/northeast. The groundwater flow direction appears consistent
with historical flow directions for the adjacent Valley Gas facility.
7.2 GROUNDWATER RESULTS
The groundwater analytical laboratory results from 1L-MW-1 are summarized in Table 3.
Historic and current groundwater data at and around the Site are presented in Figures 2 and 3.
Gasoline was reported at a concentration of 29,000 micrograms per liter (µg/L), which is above
the SFBRWQCB screening level of 760 micrograms per liter (µg/L) for gasoline. However, the
laboratory technician noted that chromatogram of this sample was mainly a dominant peak,
which is not indicative of petroleum hydrocarbons.
Benzene was detected at a concentration on 62 µg/L, which is above the MCL of 1.0 µg/L for
benzene. Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) was detected at a concentration of 37,000 µg/L,
which is above the MCL of 13 µg/L for MTBE. Xylenes was detected at a concentration of 300
µg/L, which is above the SFBRWQCB ESL of 20 µg/L for xylenes.
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 12 of 22 May 15, 2020

Chloromethane was detected at a concentration of 25 µg/L, which does not exceed the
SFBRWQCB MCL of 190 µg/L for chloromethane. Ethylbenzene and toluene were detected at
concentrations of 11 µg/L and 18 µg/L, which do not exceed the respective MCLs of 300 µg/L
and 150 µg/L.
Concentrations of 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, 4-ethyltoluene, and N-

propylbenzene were detected at 24 µg/L, 22 µg/L, 58 µg/L, and 0.69 µg/L, respectively. None of
these analytes have MCLs or SFBRWQCB ESLs associated with them.
7.3 SOIL SAMPLE RESULTS
The analytical laboratory results for the soil samples are summarized in Tables 4 and 5. Table 4
includes the analytical results for TPH and Table 5 includes the analytical results for VOCs. Soil
sample results are also presented on Figures 4 and 5. Figure 4 presents TPH analytical results
and Figure 5 presents VOC analytical results.
Gasoline was detected in SB-2-25 and SB-2-30 at concentrations of 6,900,000 µg/kg and
2,800,000 µg/kg, respectively. These detections exceed the USEPA RSLs of 520,000 µg/kg and
82,000 for µg/kg for either aliphatic or aromatic fractions of gasoline. However, the laboratory
technician noted that chromatogram of this sample was mainly a dominant peak, which is not
indicative of petroleum hydrocarbons.
Diesel was detected in SB-2-25 and SB-2-30 at concentrations of 2,600,000 µg/kg and 280,000
µg/kg, respectively. These detections exceed the USEPA RSLs of 96,000 µg/kg and 97,000
µg/kg for either aliphatic or aromatic fractions of diesel. However, the laboratory technician
noted that the chromatogram of these samples were mainly lower boiling hydrocarbons.
Concentrations of 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene were detected in SB-2-25, SB-2-30, and SB-3-10 at

concentrations of 200,000 µg/kg, 35,000 µg/kg, and 10 µg/kg, respectively. These detected
concentrations do not exceed the USEPA RSL of 300,000 µg/kg for 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene.
Concentrations of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene were detected in SB-2-25 and SB-2-30 at 60,000

µg/kg and 10,000 µg/kg, respectively. An estimated concentration of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene
was detected in SB-3-10 at 10 J µg/kg (the J indicates an estimated concentration between the
method detection limit and the laboratory reporting limit). These concentrations do not exceed
the USEPA RSL of 270,000 µg/kg for 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene.
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 13 of 22 May 15, 2020

Concentrations of 1,3-dichlorobenzene were detected in SB-2-25, SB-2-30, and SB-3-10 at
79,000 µg/kg, 14,000 µg/kg, and 3.2 J µg/kg, respectively. Neither a DTSC-SL or UDEPA RSL
are associated 1,3-dichlorobenzene.
Ethyl benzene was detected in SB-2-25 and SB-2-30 at concentrations of 43 µg/kg and 81
µg/kg, respectively. These detections do not exceed the USEPA RSL of 5,800 µg/kg for ethyl
benzene.
N-propylbenzene was detected in SB-2-25 and SB-2-30 at concentrations of 13,000 µg/kg and
1,800 µg/kg, respectively. These detections do not exceed the USEPA RSL of 3,800,000 µg/kg
for N-propylbenzene.
Toluene was detected in SB-2-30 at an estimated concentration of 1.2 J µg/kg, which does not
exceed the DTSC-SL of 1,100,000 µg/kg for toluene.
Xylenes were detected in SB-2-25 and SB-2-30 at concentrations of 3,400 µg/kg and 600 µg/kg,
respectively. These detections do not exceed the USEPA RSL of 580,000 µg/kg for xylenes.
7.4 SOIL VAPOR RESULTS
The analytical laboratory results for the soil vapor samples are summarized in Table 6. VMP
results are presented on Figures 6 through 9. Results for shallow soil samples (5 feet or less)
are presented on Figures 6 and 7. Results for the deep soil samples (approximately 15 feet bgs)
are presented on Figures 8 and 9.
Concentrations of PCE were detected in samples VMP-1-15’, VMP-5-4’9”, and VMP-6-15’ at

120 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3), 91 µg/m3, and 11 µg/m3, respectively. These
detections exceed the DTSC-SL of 0.014 µg/m3 for PCE.
Ethyl benzene was detected in VMP-6-15’ at a concentration of 280 µg/m3, which exceeds the
USEPA RSL of 22 µg/m3.
Hexane was detected in VMP-2-14’8” at a concentration of 5.4 µg/m3, which exceeds the
USEPA RSL of 0.033 µg/m3.
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 14 of 22 May 15, 2020

Chloroform was detected in VMP-6-15’ at a concentration of 7.6 µg/m3, which exceeds the
USEPA RSL of 0.0036 µg/m3.
Cyclohexane was detected in VMP-2-14’8” at a concentration of 84 µg/m3, which exceeds the

USEPA RSL of 30 µg/m3.
Concentrations of toluene were detected in samples VMP-4-4’, VMP-6-3’6”, and VMP-6-15’ at

25 µg/m3, 31 µg/m3, and 14 µg/m3, respectively. These detections exceed the DTSC-SL of 9.3
µg/m3 for toluene.
Cumeme (isopropylbenzene) was detected in VMP-4-4” and VMP-4-14’1” at concentrations of

20 µg/m3 and 5,600 µg/m3, respectively, which exceeds the USEPA RSL of 13 µg/m3 for
cumene.
Propylbenzene was detected in VMP-4-14’ and VMP-4-14’1” at concentration of 46 µg/m3 and

18,000 µg/m3, which exceeds the USEPA RSL of 30 µg/m3 for propylbenzene.
Concentrations of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene were detected in VMP-4-4’ and VMP-4-14’11” at 120

µg/m3 and 41,000 µg/m3, respectively. These detections exceed the USEPA RSL of 1.9 µg/m3
for 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene.
Concentrations of 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene were detected in VMP-4-4’ and VMP-4-14’11” at 140

µg/m3 and 100,000 µg/m3, respectively. These detections exceed the USEPA RSL of 1.9 µg/m3
for 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene.
Concentrations of 1,3-dichlorobenzene were detected in VMP-5-4’9” and VMP-6-15’ at 12 µg/m3

and 35 µg/m3, respectively. An estimated concentration of 1,3-dichlorobenzene was detected in
VMP-3-3’3” at 8.0 J µg/m3. These detections and estimated detections exceed the DTSC-SL of
0.051 µg/m3 for 1,3-dichlorobenzene.
Carbon disulfide was detected in VMP-6-15’ at a concentration of 26 µg/m3, which exceeds the
USEPA RSL of 22 µg/m3 for carbon disulfide.
Concentrations of m,p-xylene were detected in VMP-4-4’, VMP-4-4’11”, VMP-6-3'6" and VMP-6-

15’ at 15 µg/m3, 10,000 µg/m3, 6.4 µg/m3 and 6.6 µg/m3, respectively, and o-xylene was
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 15 of 22 May 15, 2020

detected at 5.5 µg/m3 in VMP-6-15’. These detections exceed the DTSC-SL of 3 µg/m3 for
xylenes.
Hexane, cyclohexane, and toluene were detected in at least one other VMP sample below their
respective DTSC-SL or USEPA RSL. Heptane was detected in one sample VMP below its
USEPA RSL. Ethanol and 4-ethyltoluene were detected in two VMP samples each, but neither
has been assigned a DTSC-SL or USEPA RSL.
7.5 INVESTIGATION DERIVED WASTE
Used disposable personal protective equipment (PPE) and other disposable equipment was
placed into plastic trash bags and disposed of in a municipal refuse dumpster for ultimate
disposal at a municipal landfill. Investigation derived waste (IDW) including soil cuttings, purge
water, and decontamination water has been profiled, placed in sealed, labeled 55-gallon drums,
and will be disposed of as non-hazardous waste at Instrat, Inc.
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 16 of 22 May 15, 2020

8 SUMMARY
___________________________________________________________________________________
The Former Imperial Laundry Investigation included the following findings:
• A geophysical survey was unable to identify the presence of an abandoned sanitary

sewer line running north and south through the Site.
• Groundwater around the Site is at depths of approximately 90 feet bgs, as measured in

monitoring wells on and north of the Site.
• Site shallow lithology is generally underline by Silty Sands, Silts, and Clays. An
approximate eight-foot-thick variable hard pan layer exists across the Site from generally
from four feet bgs to 12 feet bgs.
• The highest impacts to soil and soil vapor appear to be below the hard pan layer.
• The analytical results from soil, soil vapor, and groundwater samples indicate the Site is
impacted with petroleum hydrocarbons and low concentrations of chlorinated solvents.
• In general, the highest impacts to soil and vapor samples appear to be at the east side
of the former footprint of the drycleaner, at a location that would have been the rear of
the former building. Additionally, although some samples in this area are below
laboratory reporting limits, those samples exhibit elevated detection limits.
• Deep soils and groundwater may be impacted directly under the Community Center
building. These deeper impacts may be impacting indoor air quality within the
Community Center building.
• Compounds of potential concern (COPCs) were detected in groundwater, soil, and soil
vapor above their respective DTSL-SLs, USEPA RSLs, and/or SFBRWQCB ESLs.
• Based on the findings, a specific source for chlorinated solvents near the Former
Imperial Laundry has not been identified. Impacts identified from the former dry cleaner
may be from historic Stoddard Solvent use.
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 17 of 22 May 15, 2020

• A specific source area of chlorinated solvents, specifically PCE, has not been identified
on the Site.
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 18 of 22 May 15, 2020

9 RECOMMENDATIONS
___________________________________________________________________________________
Based on the results of the investigation the following recommendations are proposed as the
next steps:
• Conduct a Cone Penetrometer Test and Membrane Interface Probe (CPT/MIP)

investigation to define the vertical and lateral extent of impacts at the Site. This
information would be used for targeted investigation, remediation and monitoring in the
future.
• Collect groundwater samples from IL-MW-1 and the Valley Gas facility monitoring well
network and analyze for an expanded list of VOCs.
A meeting between the City of Fresno, RWQCB, and Consultant should occur to discuss a long-
term strategy and future action for the Site.
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 19 of 22 May 15, 2020

10 LIMITATIONS
___________________________________________________________________________________
This report was prepared in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily
exercised by other members of Kleinfelder’s profession practicing in the same locality, under
similar conditions and at the date the services are provided. Our conclusions, opinions and
recommendations are based on a limited number of observations and data. It is possible that
conditions could vary between or beyond the data evaluated. Kleinfelder makes no other
representation, guarantee or warranty, express or implied, regarding the services,
communication (oral or written), report, opinion, or instrument of service provided.
This report may be used only by City of Fresno – PARCS Department and the registered design
professional in responsible charge and only for the purposes stated for this specific engagement
within a reasonable time from its issuance, but in no event later than two (2) years from the date
of the report.
The scope of services described here is not intended to be inclusive, to identify all potential
concerns, or to eliminate the possibility of other environmental problems. Within current
technology, no level of assessment can show conclusively that a property or its structures are
completely free of hazardous substances. Therefore, Kleinfelder cannot offer a certification that
the property is free of environmental liability. Kleinfelder will assume no responsibility or liability
whatsoever for any claim, loss of property value, damage, or injury which results from pre-
existing hazardous materials being encountered or present on the project site, or from the
discovery of such hazardous materials.
Kleinfelder offers various levels of investigative and engineering services to suit the varying
needs of different clients. It should be recognized that definition and evaluation of geologic and
environmental conditions are a difficult and inexact science. Judgments leading to conclusions
and recommendations are generally made with incomplete knowledge of the subsurface
conditions present due to the limitations of data from field studies. Although risk can never be
eliminated, more-detailed and extensive studies yield more information, which may help
understand and manage the level of risk. Since detailed study and analysis involves greater
expense, our clients participate in determining levels of service that provide adequate
information for their purposes at acceptable levels of risk. More extensive studies, including
subsurface studies or field tests, should be performed to reduce uncertainties. Acceptance of
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 20 of 22 May 15, 2020

this report will indicate that City of Fresno – PARCS Department has reviewed the document
and determined that it does not need or want a greater level of service than provided.
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 21 of 22 May 15, 2020

REFERENCES
___________________________________________________________________________________
California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA), California Department of Toxic

Substances Control (DTSC), California Water Resources Control Boards, 2020. Draft
Supplemental Guidance: Screening and Evaluating Vapor Intrusion, Draft for Public
Comments. February.
California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA), Department of Toxic Substances

Control (DTSC), Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB), San
Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFBRWQCB). 2015. Advisory
Active Soil Gas Investigations. July.
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB), 2019a. Request for
Investigation of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil and Groundwater, Former Imperial
Laundry, 2165 S. Elm Avenue, Fresno, Fresno County. May 1.
_______, 2019b. Workplan for Site Assessment, City of Fresno – PARCS Department Property,
2165 South Elm Street, Fresno. September 23.
Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), 2014. Human Health Risk Assessment Note
5 – Indoor Air Action Levels for Trichloroethylene (TCE). August.
_______, 2019. Human Health Risk Assessment Note 3 – DTSC-Modified Screening Levels
(DTSC-SLs). April.
Krazan and Associates, Inc. (Krazan), 2019. Workplan for Site Assessment, City of Fresno –
PARCS Department Property, 2165 South Elm Street, Fresno, California 93706.0 July
23.
San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFBRWQCB), 2019. Groundwater
Environmental Screening Levels.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2009. National Primary Drinking Water
Regulations. May.
_______, 2019. Regional Screening Levels (TR = 1E-06, THQ = 1.0). November.
20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 22 of 22 May 15, 2020

FIGURES
PLOTTED: 5/15/2020, KHagan
Site
Location
The information included on this graphic representation has been compiled from a variety of
sources and is subject to change without notice. Kleinfelder makes no representations or
warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of
such information. This document is not intended for use as a land survey product nor is it
designed or intended as a construction design document. The use or misuse of the information
contained on this graphic representation is at the sole risk of the party using or misusing the information.
SITE LOCATION
L:\2020\20203368.001A - Former Imperial Cleaners\2.0 Technical Information\2.8 GIS
Explanation
£
Approximate Site
Boundary
Basemap: USGS The National Map
Inset: National Geographic World Map
map service via ESRI
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
Locations are Approximate
PROJECT: 20203368 FIGURE

SITE LOCATION MAP
DRAWN: MAY 2020
1
DRAWN BY: KFH
SACRAMENTO, CA
FORMER IMPERIAL LAUNDRY

CHECKED BY: WS CITY OF FRESNO, PARCS DEPARTMENT PROPERTY
2165 SOUTH ELM STREET
FILE NAME: FRESNO, CA 93706
F1_SLM.mxd
MW-10 Date Results (µg/L)

PCE 10/31/2018 100
A
!
MW-10 TCE 10/31/2018 9.2
A
!
MW-12
A
!
MW-11

PCE 10/31/2018 30
MW-9 Date Results (µg/L) TCE 10/31/2018 0.79
A
!
PCE 10/31/2018 < 0.50 MW-5
TCE 10/31/2018 < 0.50 A
!
MW-9

PCE 10/31/2018 < 0.50
TCE 10/31/2018 < 0.50 ENUE
O R NIA AV MW-6 Date Results (µg/L)
CA L IF
ST PCE 10/31/2018 0.58
EA A
!
MW-7 Date Results (µg/L) TCE 10/31/2018 < 0.50
MW-6
PCE 10/31/2018 < 0.50
TCE 10/31/2018 < 0.50 A
!
MW-7*
PCE 10/31/2018 < 0.50 A
! A
!
MW-8* MW-4
TCE 10/31/2018 < 0.50
MW-3 MAXIE L. PARKS
A
! COMMUNITY CENTER
VALLEY GAS
MW-3 Date Results (µg/L) MW-2 Date Results (µg/L)
PCE 10/31/2018 < 0.50
A
! PCE 10/31/2018 5.7
MW-2
TCE 10/31/2018 < 0.50 A
! TCE 10/31/2018 < 0.50
MW-1R
SO
UT
H
MW-1R Date Results (µg/L)
A
EL
PCE 10/31/2018 440
!
M
IL-MW-1
AV
TCE 10/31/2018 < 0.50
E
NU
E
Notes:
µg/L = micrograms per liter IL-MW-1 Date Results (µg/L)
PCE= tetrachloroethene PCE 2/24/2020 < 0.50
TCE = trichloroethene
* = approximate location TCE 2/24/2020 < 0.50
FIGURE
£
The information included on this graphic
Explanation PROJECT NO: 20203368
representation has been compiled from a
variety of sources and is subject to change
HISTORICAL VALLEY GAS AND IMPERIAL LAUNDRY
A
! DRAWN: MAY 2020 PCE AND TCE CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUNDWATER
without notice. Kleinfelder makes no
Monitoring Well Location representations or warranties, express or
0 125
SACRAMENTO, CA
implied, as to accuracy, completeness,

Approximate Location of Former Dry Cleaner DRAWN BY: KFH
2
timeliness, or rights to the use of such
Feet Assessor's Parcel Boundary
information. This document is not intended
for use as a land survey product nor is it
Locations are Approximate designed or intended as a construction CHECKED BY: WS CITY OF FRESNO, PARCS DEPARTMENT PROPERTY
design document. The use or misuse of the
information contained on this graphic FILE NAME: 2165 SOUTH ELM STREET
Aerial: ESRI World Imagery (Clarity) representation is at the sole risk of the www.kleinfelder.com F2_GW_PCETCE.mxd FRESNO, CA 93706
party using or misusing the information.

MTBE 10/31/2018 160 MW-5 Date Results (µg/L)
A
! MTBE 10/31/2018 0.72
Gasoline 10/31/2018 180 MW-10
Gasoline 10/31/2018 < 50
Benzene 10/31/2018 < 0.50
Benzene 10/31/2018 < 0.50
Toluene 10/31/2018 < 0.50
Toluene 10/31/2018 < 0.50
Ethyl benzene 10/31/2018 < 0.50
MW-9 Date Results (µg/L) Ethyl benzene 10/31/2018 < 0.50
Total Xylenes 10/31/2018 < 0.50
MTBE 10/31/2018 4,400 A
!
MW-12 Total Xylenes 10/31/2018 < 0.50
A
! Gasoline 10/31/2018 3,300**
MW-11
Benzene 10/31/2018 < 0.50
Toluene 10/31/2018 < 0.50 MW-4 Date Results (µg/L)
Ethyl benzene 10/31/2018 < 0.50 MTBE 10/31/2018 2,300
Total Xylenes 10/31/2018 < 0.50 Gasoline 10/31/2018 2,400
Benzene 10/31/2018 < 0.50

A
! Toluene 10/31/2018 < 0.50
MW-5 Ethyl benzene 10/31/2018 < 0.50
MTBE 10/31/2018 51,000 A
! Total Xylenes 10/31/2018 27
Gasoline 10/31/2018 43,000** MW-9
Benzene 10/31/2018 < 0.50
Toluene 10/31/2018 < 0.50 MW-6 Date Results (µg/L)
Ethyl benzene 10/31/2018 < 0.50 MTBE 10/31/2018 < 0.50
ENUE
Total Xylenes 10/31/2018 < 0.50
O R NIA AV Gasoline 10/31/2018 < 50
CA L IF
ST Benzene 10/31/2018 < 0.50
EA A
! Toluene 10/31/2018 < 0.50
MW-3 Date Results (µg/L) MW-6
Ethyl benzene 10/31/2018 < 0.50
MTBE 11/1/2018 5,200
A
! Total Xylenes 10/31/2018 < 0.50
Gasoline 11/1/2018 46,000 MW-7*
Benzene 11/1/2018 130
Toluene 11/1/2018 180 A
! A
! MW-2 Date Results (µg/L)
Ethyl benzene 11/1/2018 < 0.50 MW-8* MW-4 MTBE 10/31/2018 2,400
Total Xylenes 11/1/2018 400 A
! MW-3 Gasoline 10/31/2018 6,400
VALLEY GAS
MAXIE L. PARKS
Benzene 10/31/2018 180
A
! COMMUNITY CENTER Toluene 10/31/2018 850
MW-8 Date Results (µg/L) MW-2 Ethyl benzene 10/31/2018 59
MTBE 10/31/2018 < 0.50 A
! Total Xylenes 10/31/2018 630
MW-1R
SO
Gasoline 10/31/2018 < 50
UT
Benzene 10/31/2018 < 0.50
H
A
EL
Toluene 10/31/2018 < 0.50 IL-MW-1 Date Results (µg/L) ! IL-MW-1 Date Results (µg/L)
M
Ethyl benzene 10/31/2018 < 0.50 MTBE 2/24/2020 37,000 IL-MW-1 MTBE 2/24/2020 37,000
AV
Notes:
E
µg/L = micrograms per liter Total Xylenes 10/31/2018 < 0.50 Gasoline 2/24/2020 29,000*** Gasoline 2/24/2020 29,000**
NU
MTBE = methyl tert butyl ether
E
* = approximate location Benzene 2/24/2020 62 Benzene 2/24/2020 62
** = gasoline value due to MTBE
*** = The laboratory technician noted that the
Toluene 2/24/2020 18 Toluene 2/24/2020 18
chromatogram of this sample is mainly a Ethyl benzene 2/24/2020 11 Ethyl benzene 2/24/2020 11
dominant peak(s) which is not indicative of
petroleum hydrocarbons. Total Xylenes 2/24/2020 300 Total Xylenes 2/24/2020 300
FIGURE
£
Explanation representation has been compiled from a PROJECT NO: 20203368 HISTORICAL VALLEY GAS AND IMPERIAL LAUNDRY
variety of sources and is subject to change
MTBE, GASOLINE, AND BTEX
A
! DRAWN: MAY 2020
without notice. Kleinfelder makes no
Monitoring Well Location representations or warranties, express or
0 125 CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUNDWATER
SACRAMENTO, CA
implied, as to accuracy, completeness,

Approximate Location of Former Dry Cleaner DRAWN BY: KFH
3
information. This document is not intended
Feet Assessor's Parcel Boundary for use as a land survey product nor is it
CHECKED BY: WS
designed or intended as a construction
design document. The use or misuse of the CITY OF FRESNO, PARCS DEPARTMENT PROPERTY
information contained on this graphic FILE NAME: 2165 SOUTH ELM STREET
Aerial: ESRI World Imagery (Clarity) representation is at the sole risk of the www.kleinfelder.com F3_GW_VOC.mxd
party using or misusing the information. FRESNO, CA 93706
MAXIE L. PARKS
COMMUNITY CENTER
VALLEY GAS
D
"
SB-3-10' SB-3
Analyte Result (µg/kg)
Diesel < 1,000
Gasoline < 1,000
Motor Oil < 10,000
SB-4-10'
Diesel < 1,000 D
"
Gasoline < 1,000 SB-4
Motor Oil < 10,000 A
! IL-MW-1
1L-MW-1-31'
Diesel < 1,000
Gasoline < 1,000 SB-2 D
"
Motor Oil < 10,000 D
" SB-1
1L-MW-1-35'
Analyte Result (µg/kg) D
" SB-5
Diesel < 1,000
Gasoline < 1,000
Motor Oil < 10,000
SB-5-10'
SB-1-27' SB-2-25'
Analyte Result (µg/kg) Analyte Result (µg/kg)
Diesel < 1,000
Diesel < 1,000 Diesel 2,600,000 **
Gasoline < 1,000
Gasoline < 1,000 Gasoline 6,900,000 *
Motor Oil < 10,000
Motor Oil < 10,000 Motor Oil < 100,000
SB-1-35' SB-2-30'
Analyte Result (µg/kg) Analyte Result (µg/kg)

Diesel < 1,000 Diesel 280,000 **
Gasoline < 1,000 Gasoline 2,800,000 *
Motor Oil < 10,000 Motor Oil < 10,000
Explanation
D
" Soil Boring
A
! Monitoring Well
£
Notes:
Approximate Location of Former Dry Cleaner µg/kg = micrograms per kilogram
Assessor's Parcel Boundary * = The laboratory technician has noted that the
chromatogram of this sample is mainly a dominant
Aerial: © Google Earth image dated 8/23/2018.
peak(s) which is not indicative of petroleum hydrocarbons
** = The laboratory technician has noted that the
0 20 40 chromatogram of this sample is mainly lower boiling
Feet
hydrocarbons
PROJECT: 20203368
SOIL - TPH CONCENTRATIONS FIGURE
The information included on this graphic DRAWN: MAY 2020
SACRAMENTO, CA
representation has been compiled from a variety

of sources and is subject to change without notice.
Kleinfelder makes no representations or warranties,
express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness,
timeliness, or rights to the use of such information.
This document is not intended for use as a land
survey product nor is it designed or intended as a
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
KFH
WS FORMER IMPERIAL LAUNDRY
CITY OF FRESNO, PARCS DEPARTMENT PROPERTY
4
construction design document. The use or misuse
of the information contained on this graphic
FILE NAME: 2165 SOUTH ELM STREET
representation is at the sole risk of the party using
or misusing the information. www.kleinfelder.com F4_Soil_TPH.mxd FRESNO, CA 93706
PLOTTED: 5/15/2020, KHagan Explanation
D
" Soil Boring
A
! Monitoring Well
£
Approximate Location of Former Dry Cleaner
Assessor's Parcel Boundary
0 20 40
Feet
SB-3-10'
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 10
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 3.2 J
4-Ethyltoluene 3.2 J
MAXIE L. PARKS
Ethyl benzene < 5.0 COMMUNITY CENTER
MTBE < 5.0
N-Propylbenzene < 5.0
Toluene < 5.0
Xylenes < 5.0
VALLEY GAS
SB-4-10'
Analyte Result (µg/kg) D
"
SB-3
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene < 5.0
4-Ethyltoluene < 5.0
Ethyl benzene < 5.0
MTBE < 5.0
Toluene < 5.0
Xylenes < 5.0
D
"
SB-4
A
! IL-MW-1
1L-MW-1-31'
Ethyl benzene < 5.0
MTBE < 5.0 SB-2 D
"
D
" SB-1
Toluene < 5.0
Xylenes < 5.0 D
" SB-5
1L-MW-1-35'
Ethyl benzene < 5.0
MTBE < 5.0
Toluene < 5.0 SB-1-27' SB-2-25'
Xylenes < 5.0 Analyte Result (µg/kg) Analyte Result (µg/kg)
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene < 5.0 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 200,000
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 5.0 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 60,000
SB-5-10' 4-Ethyltoluene < 5.0 4-Ethyltoluene 79,000

Analyte Result (µg/kg) Ethyl benzene < 5.0 Ethyl benzene 43
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene < 5.0 MTBE < 5.0 MTBE < 5.0
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 5.0 N-Propylbenzene < 5.0 N-Propylbenzene 13,000
4-Ethyltoluene < 5.0 Toluene < 5.0 Toluene < 5.0
Ethyl benzene < 5.0 Xylenes < 5.0 Xylenes 3,400
MTBE < 5.0 SB-1-35' SB-2-30'
N-Propylbenzene < 5.0 Analyte Result (µg/kg) Analyte Result (µg/kg)
Toluene < 5.0 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene < 5.0 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 35,000
Xylenes < 5.0 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 5.0 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 10,000
4-Ethyltoluene < 5.0 4-Ethyltoluene 14,000
Ethyl benzene < 5.0 Ethyl benzene 81
MTBE < 5.0 MTBE < 5.0
Notes: N-Propylbenzene < 5.0 N-Propylbenzene 1,800
J = Estimated Toluene < 5.0 Toluene 1.2 J
µg/kg = micrograms per kilogram
MTBE = methyl tert butyl ether Xylenes < 5.0 Xylenes 600
PROJECT: 20203368
SOIL - SELECT VOC CONCENTRATIONS FIGURE
SACRAMENTO, CA

DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
KFH
5
or misusing the information. www.kleinfelder.com F5_Soil_VOC.mxd FRESNO, CA 93706
SS-1
3
Analyte Result (µg/m )
PCE < 350
TCE < 270
MAXIE L. PARKS
cis-1,2-DCE < 200 COMMUNITY CENTER
trans-1,2-DCE < 200 *
!
VC < 130 SS-1
*
!
VALLEY GAS SS-2
SS-2
3
PCE 21
TCE < 5.5 SS-3
cis-1,2-DCE < 4.0 Analyte Result (µg/m )
3
trans-1,2-DCE < 4.0 PCE 48

VC < 2.6 TCE 3.4 J
cis-1,2-DCE < 4.0
SS-4 trans-1,2-DCE < 4.0
3 VC < 2.6
PCE 32 *
!
SS-3
TCE < 5.5 VMP-2-3'5"
3
trans-1,2-DCE < 4.0 *

! PCE < 9.1
SS-4
VC < 2.6
,
! ,
! TCE < 7.2
VMP-2
VMP-1 cis-1,2-DCE < 5.3
VMP-3-3'3" trans-1,2-DCE < 5.3
3 VC < 3.4
,
!
PCE < 9.1 ,
! VMP-4
TCE < 7.2 VMP-3
VMP-4-4'
3
trans-1,2-DCE < 5.3 PCE < 22

VC < 3.4 TCE < 18
cis-1,2-DCE < 13
VMP-5-4'9" trans-1,2-DCE < 13
3 VC < 8.4
,
! ,
!
PCE 91 VMP-5 VMP-6
TCE < 6.9 VMP-6-3'6"
3
trans-1,2-DCE < 5.1 PCE < 8.5

VC < 3.3 TCE < 6.8
cis-1,2-DCE < 5.0

trans-1,2-DCE < 5.0
VC < 3.2
Explanation
*
! Sub-slab Vapor Monitoring Point
,
! Soil Vapor Monitoring Point
£
Notes:
Approximate Location of Former Dry Cleaner J = Estimated
Assessor's Parcel Boundary µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meters
PCE = tetrachloroethene
cis-1,2-DCE = cis-1,2-dichloroethene
0 20 40 trans-1,2-DCE = trans-1,2-dichloroethene
Feet
VC = vinyl chloride
PROJECT: 20203368
SOIL VAPOR - SELECT SHALLOW FIGURE
SACRAMENTO, CA

CHLORINATED VOC COMPOUNDS
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
KFH
6
or misusing the information. www.kleinfelder.com F6_SV_ShallowCl.mxd FRESNO, CA 93706
SS-1
3
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene < 250
1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 310
4-Ethyltoluene < 250
MAXIE L. PARKS
1,3-Butadiene < 110 COMMUNITY CENTER
Benzene < 160 *
!
SS-1
*
!
VALLEY GAS SS-2
SS-3
3
SS-2 Analyte Result (µg/m )
3 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 4.2 J
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 3.7 J 1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 31
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.1 J 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 5.0
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 5.0 4-Ethyltoluene < 5.0
4-Ethyltoluene < 5.0 1,3-Butadiene 4.2 J
1,3-Butadiene < 4.5 Benzene 5.4
Benzene 5.9 J
VMP-2-3'5"
3
SS-4 Analyte Result (µg/m )
3 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene < 6.6
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 3.3 J *
! 1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 8.1
SS-3
1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 31 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 6.6
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 5.0 4-Ethyltoluene < 6.6
4-Ethyltoluene < 5.0 *
! Ethyl benzene < 5.8
SS-4
1,3-Butadiene < 4.5 ,
! ,
! Isopropylbenzene < 6.6
Benzene 2.8 J VMP-2 MTBE < 19
VMP-1
Propylbenzene < 6.6
VMP-3-3'3" VMP-4 ,
!
3 ,
! VMP-4-4'
VMP-3 3
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene < 6.6 Analyte Result (µg/m )
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8.0 J 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 140
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 6.6 1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 20
4-Ethyltoluene < 6.6 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 120
Ethyl benzene < 5.8 4-Ethyltoluene 160
Isopropylbenzene < 6.6 Ethyl benzene < 14
MTBE < 19 Isopropylbenzene 20
Propylbenzene < 6.6 ,
! VMP-5 VMP-6 ,
! MTBE < 48
Propylbenzene 46
VMP-5-4'9" VMP-6-3'6"
3 3
Analyte Result (µg/m ) Analyte Result (µg/m )
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene < 6.3 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene < 6.2

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 12 1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 7.6
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 6.3 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 6.2
4-Ethyltoluene < 6.3 4-Ethyltoluene < 6.2
Ethyl benzene < 5.6 Ethyl benzene < 5.5
Isopropylbenzene < 6.3 Isopropylbenzene < 6.2
Explanation MTBE < 19 MTBE < 18
Propylbenzene < 6.3 Propylbenzene < 6.2
*
! Sub-slab Vapor Monitoring Point
,
£
Notes:
0 20 40 J = Estimated
Feet
µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meters
PROJECT: 20203368
SOIL VAPOR - SELECT SHALLOW FIGURE
SACRAMENTO, CA

VOC CONCENTRATIONS
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
KFH
7
or misusing the information. www.kleinfelder.com F7_SV_ShallowOth.mxd FRESNO, CA 93706
MAXIE L. PARKS
COMMUNITY CENTER
VALLEY GAS
VMP-2-14'8"
3
VMP-1-15' Analyte Result (µg/m )
3
Analyte Result (µg/m ) PCE < 140
PCE 120 ,
! ,
! TCE < 120
VMP-2
TCE < 28 VMP-1 cis-1,2-DCE < 85
cis-1,2-DCE < 20 trans-1,2-DCE < 85
trans-1,2-DCE < 20 VC < 55
VC < 13 ,
!
,
! VMP-4
VMP-3
VMP-4-14'11"
3
PCE < 2,100
TCE < 1,700
cis-1,2-DCE < 1,200
trans-1,2-DCE < 1,200
VC < 800
,
! ,
!
VMP-5 VMP-6
VMP-6-15'
3
PCE 11
TCE < 6.3
cis-1,2-DCE < 4.6

trans-1,2-DCE < 4.6
VC < 3.0
Explanation
,
£
Notes:
Approximate Location of Former Dry Cleaner J = Estimated
Assessor's Parcel Boundary µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meters
cis-1,2-DCE = cis-1,2-dichloroethene
0 20 40 trans-1,2-DCE = trans-1,2-dichloroethene
Feet
VC = vinyl chloride
PROJECT: 20203368
SOIL VAPOR - SELECT DEEP FIGURE
SACRAMENTO, CA

CHLORINATED VOC CONCENTRATIONS
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
KFH
8
or misusing the information. www.kleinfelder.com F8_SV_DeepCl.mxd FRESNO, CA 93706
MAXIE L. PARKS
COMMUNITY CENTER
VALLEY GAS
VMP-2-14'8"
3
VMP-1-15' 1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 130
3
Analyte Result (µg/m ) 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 100
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene < 25 ,
! ,
! 4-Ethyltoluene < 100
VMP-2
1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 31 VMP-1 Ethyl benzene < 93
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 25 Isopropylbenzene < 100
4-Ethyltoluene < 25 MTBE < 78
Ethyl benzene < 22
VMP-4
,
! Propylbenzene < 100
,
!
Isopropylbenzene < 25 VMP-3
MTBE < 21
VMP-4-14'11"
Propylbenzene < 25
3
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 100,000
1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 1,900
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 41,000
4-Ethyltoluene 75,000
,
! VMP-6 ,
! Ethyl benzene < 1,400
VMP-5
Isopropylbenzene 5,600
MTBE < 1,100
Propylbenzene 18,000
VMP-6-15'
3
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 35
Ethyl benzene 5.4
Explanation Isopropylbenzene < 5.7
MTBE < 17
,
Propylbenzene < 5.7
£
Notes:
0 20 40 J = Estimated
Feet
µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meters
PROJECT: 20203368
SOIL VAPOR - SELECT DEEP FIGURE
SACRAMENTO, CA

VOC CONCENTRATIONS
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
KFH
9
or misusing the information. www.kleinfelder.com F9_SV_DeepOth.mxd FRESNO, CA 93706
!
A
MW-10
189.13'
!
A
MW-12
!
A 189.07'
MW-11
189.07'
!
A
MW-5*
! 187.53'
A
MW-9
189.17'
189.25'
IA AV ENUE
L I FO RN
C A
ST MW-6
EA ! 188.94'
18
A
9'
189.5'
MW-4
! 189.66'
A
MW-3 MAXIE L. PARKS

189.57'A! COMMUNITY CENTER
VALLEY GAS
189.75' !
A
MW-2
A 189.73'
!
MW-1R
SO
189.83'
THU
!
EL
A
M
IL-MW-1
AV
189.96'
EN
UE
£
PROJECT NO: 20203368 FIGURE
Explanation representation has been compiled from a
variety of sources and is subject to change GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR MAP
189.5' Groundwater Elevation Contour without notice. Kleinfelder makes no DRAWN: MAY 2020
A Monitoring Well Location
!
10
representations or warranties, express or
0 125 Approximate Location of Former Dry Cleaner
MW-9 Well Name implied, as to accuracy, completeness,
DRAWN BY: KFH
SACRAMENTO, CA

Feet 189.17' Groundwater Elevation Assessor's Parcel Boundary information. This document is not intended
for use as a land survey product nor is it
designed or intended as a construction CHECKED BY: WS CITY OF FRESNO, PARCS DEPARTMENT PROPERTY
design document. The use or misuse of the
* Groundwater elevation not used in the interpolation of groundwater elevation contours information contained on this graphic FILE NAME: 2165 SOUTH ELM STREET
Aerial: ESRI World Imagery (Clarity) Elevations are North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88)
representation is at the sole risk of the
party using or misusing the information.
www.kleinfelder.com F10_GW_contours.mxd FRESNO, CA 93706
TABLES
Table 1
Monitoring Well Construction Details and Water Level Measurments
Former Imperial Laundry
Fresno, California
Screened Depth to Groundwater

Well Depth TOC Elevation (feet
Monitoring Well Interval (feet Latitude Longitude Water Elevation
(feet bgs) NAVD88)
bgs) (feet) (feet NAVD88)
Former Imperial Laundry Monitoring Well
IL-MW-1 120 85-120 282.93 36.72034434 -119.7907868 92.97 189.96
Valley Gas Monitoring Wells
MW-1R 128 98-128 281.95 36.72055956 -119.7911776 92.12 189.83
MW-2 125 95-125 282.95 36.72066318 -119.7910092 93.22 189.73
MW-3 127 97-127 283.04 36.72079074 -119.7911226 93.47 189.57
MW-4 129 99-129 282.95 36.72092784 -119.7910484 93.29 189.66
MW-5 120 95-120 282.88 36.72187140 -119.7909501 95.35 187.53
MW-6 120 95-120 282.62 36.72129422 -119.7903533 93.68 188.94
MW-9 120 95-120 282.90 36.72173954 -119.7924007 93.73 189.17
MW-10 120 95-120 284.98 36.72269775 -119.7934226 95.85 189.13
MW-11 120 95-120 284.68 36.72226948 -119.7941579 95.61 189.07
MW-12 113.5 92-113.5 285.39 36.72237061 -119.7923715 96.32 189.07
Notes:
bgs= below ground surface
TOC = Top of Casing
NAVD88 = North American Vertical Datum of 1988
Monitoring wells surveyed February 24, 2020 by Morrow Surveying of West
Sacramento, CA North American Datum 1983
Table 2
Soil Boring and Vapor Monitoring Point Survey Data
Former Imperial Laundry
Fresno, California
Ground Surface Elevation

Sample Location Latitude Longitude
(Feet NAVD88)
SB-1 36.72019216 -119.7906529 282.75

SB-2 36.72020518 -119.7902977 282.59
SB-3 36.72059061 -119.7908411 283.47
SB-4 36.72037736 -119.7909253 282.68
SB-5 36.72013888 -119.7908232 282.36
VMP-1 36.72028743 -119.7907633 283.11
VMP-2 36.72029794 -119.7903545 283.52
VMP-3 36.7201955 -119.7905614 282.83
VMP-4 36.72021183 -119.7902982 282.43
VMP-5 36.72001216 -119.7907522 281.54
VMP-6 36.72000992 -119.790320 281.83
NAVD88= North American Vertical Datum of 1988

Table 3
Select Groundwater Analytical Results
Former Imperial Cleaners
1802 East California Avenue
Fresno, CA
Sample ID IL-MW-1
Sample Date 2/24/2020 SFBRWQCB ESL -
VOCs USEPA Method 8260B (µg/L) MCL (µg/L) MCL (µg/L)
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 24 -- --
1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 0.50 -- 600
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 22 -- --
4-Ethyltoluene 58 -- --
Benzene 62 1.0 1.0
Chloromethane 25 -- 190
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene < 0.50 6.0 6.0
Ethyl benzene 11 300 30
MTBE 37,000 13 13
N-Propylbenzene 0.69 -- --
Tetrachloroethene < 0.50 5.0 5.0
Toluene 18 150 40
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene < 0.50 10 10
Trichloroethene < 0.50 -- 5.0
Vinyl Chloride < 0.50 0.50 0.50
Xylenes 300 -- 20
TPH USEPA Methods 8260B and 8015B (µg/L)
Gasoline 29,000* -- 760
Diesel < 50 -- 200
Motor Oil < 500 -- --
Bold = detection
Blue = exceeds screening level
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level, California Health & Safety Code §116365,
Department of Toxic Substances Control HERO Note 3 Screening Levels Table 4, April
2019
SFBRWQCB ESL - MCL = San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board
Environmental Screening Levels, Groundwater MCL, 2019.
µg/L = micrograms per liter
* = The laboratory technician has noted that the chromatogram of this sample is mainly
a dominant peak(s) which is not indicative of pertroleum hydrocarbons
MTBE = methyl tertiary butyl ether
MCL = maximum contaminant level
VOCs = volatile organic compounds
TPH = total petroleum hydrocarbons
USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency
< = Analyte was not detected above the laboratory reporting limit listed
Table 4
Soil TPH Analytical Results
Fresno, CA
Gasoline Diesel Motor Oil
Sample ID Sample Date USEPA Methods 8015B and 8260B (µg/kg)

IL-MW-1-31 2/18/2020 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 10,000
IL-MW-1-35 2/18/2020 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 10,000
SB-1-27 2/18/2020 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 10,000
SB-1-35 2/18/2020 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 10,000
SB-2-25 2/18/2020 6,900,000* 2,600,000** < 100,000
SB-2-30 2/18/2020 2,800,000* 280,000 ** < 10,000
SB-3-10 2/18/2020 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 10,000
SB-4-10 2/18/2020 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 10,000
SB-5-10 2/18/2020 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 10,000
DTSC-SL - Residential Soil (µg/kg) -- -- --
520,000/ 96,000/ 230,000,000/
USEPA RSL - Residential Soil (µg/kg) 82,000 97,000 24,000,000
Bold = detection
DTSC-SL = Department of Toxic Substances Control Screening Levels for Residential
Soil, April 2019. Note that the DTSC-SL for motor oil is for TPH carbon range C17
through C32 (aromatic high)
USEPA - United States Environmental Protection Agency
USEPA RSL = United States Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening
Levels, Residential Soil, TR = 1E-06, THQ = 1.0, November 2019. RSL values shown for
gasoline, diesel, and motor oil are Aliphatic / Aromatic Low, Medium, and High,
respectively.
TPH = total petroleum hydrocarbons
* = The laboratory technician has noted that the chromatogram of this sample is
mainly a dominant peak(s) which is not indicative of petroleum hydrocarbons
** = The laboratory technician has noted that the chromatogram of this sample is
mainly lower boiling hydrocarbons
Table 5
Select Soil VOC Analytical Results
Fresno, CA
Sample ID IL-MW-1-31 IL-MW-1-35 SB-1-27 SB-1-35 SB-2-25 SB-2-30 SB-3-10 SB-4-10 SB-5-10 DTSC-SL - USEPA RSL -
Sample Date 2/18/2020 2/18/2020 2/18/2020 2/18/2020 2/18/2020 2/18/2020 2/18/2020 2/18/2020 2/18/2020 Residential Soil Residential Soil
Analyte USEPA Method 8260B (µg/kg) (µg/kg) (µg/kg)
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 200,000 35,000 10 < 5.0 < 5.0 -- 300,000
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 60,000 10,000 3.2 J < 5.0 < 5.0 -- 270,000
1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 -- --
4-Ethyltoluene < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 79,000 14,000 3.2 J < 5.0 < 5.0 -- --
Benzene < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 330 1,200
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 18,000 160,000
Ethyl benzene < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 43 81 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 -- 5,800
MTBE < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 -- 47,000
N-Propylbenzene < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 13,000 1,800 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 -- 3,800,000
Tetrachloroethene < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 590 24,000
Toluene < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 1.2 J < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 1,100,000 4,900,000
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 130,000 1,600,000
Trichloroethene < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 -- 940
Vinyl Chloride < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 8.2 59
Xylenes < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 3,400 600 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 -- 580,000
Notes:
Bold = detection
DTSC-SL = Department of Toxic Substances Control Screening Levels for Residential Soil, April 2019.
USEPA RSL = United States Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels, Residential Soil, TR = 1E-06, THQ = 1.0, November 2019.
J = estimated concentration between method detection limit and laboratory reporting limit
MTBE = methyl tertiary butyl ether
USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency
VOCs = volatile organic compounds
Table 6
Select Soil Vapor Analytical Results
Fresno, CA
Sample ID VMP-1-15' VMP-2-3'5" VMP-2-14'8" VMP-3-3'3" VMP-4-4' VMP-4-14'11" VMP-5-4'9" VMP-6-3'6" VMP-6-15' EPA RSL -
Sample Date 2/25/2020 2/25/2020 2/25/2020 2/24/2020 2/25/2020 2/25/2020 2/25/2020 2/25/2020 2/25/2020 DTSC SL - Residential Residential Air
Analyte TO-15 (µg/m3) Ambient Air (µg/m3) (µg/m3)
Vinyl Chloride < 13 < 3.4 < 55 < 3.4 < 8.4 < 800 < 3.3 < 3.2 < 3.0 0.00029 0.0051
Ethanol < 39 < 10 < 160 < 10 31 < 2,400 < 9.7 < 9.5 16 -- --
Carbon Disulfide < 64 < 17 < 270 < 17 < 41 < 3,900 < 16 < 16 26 -- 22
trans-1,2-DCE < 20 < 5.3 < 85 < 5.3 < 13 < 1,200 < 5.1 < 5.0 < 4.6 2.5 --
Hexane < 18 14 280 < 4.7 12 < 110 < 4.5 17 20 -- 22
cis-1,2-DCE < 20 < 5.3 < 85 < 5.3 < 13 < 1,200 < 5.1 < 5.0 < 4.6 0.25 --
Chloroform < 25 < 6.6 < 100 < 6.6 < 16 < 1,500 < 6.3 < 6.2 7.6 -- 0.0036
Cyclohexane < 18 8.8 84 < 4.6 < 11 < 1,100 < 4.4 5.0 12 -- 30
Heptane < 21 < 5.5 < 88 < 5.5 < 14 < 1,300 < 5.3 5.6 < 4.8 -- 13
TCE < 28 < 7.2 < 120 < 7.2 < 18 < 1,700 < 6.9 < 6.8 < 6.3 -- 0.014
Toluene < 19 5.1 < 81 < 5.1 25 < 1,200 6.1 31 14 9.3 156
PCE 120 < 9.1 < 140 < 9.1 < 22 < 2,100 91 < 8.5 11 0.014 0.33
Ethyl benzene < 22 < 5.8 < 93 < 5.8 < 14 < 1,400 < 5.6 < 5.5 5.4 -- 0.033
m,p-Xylene < 22 < 5.8 < 93 < 5.8 15 10,000 < 5.6 6.4 6.6 -- 3.0
o-Xylene < 22 < 5.8 < 93 < 5.8 < 14 < 1,400 < 5.6 < 5.5 5.5 -- 3.0
Cumene (isopropylbenzene) < 25 < 6.6 < 100 < 6.6 20 5,600 < 6.3 < 6.2 < 5.7 -- 13
Propylbenzene < 25 < 6.6 < 100 < 6.6 46 18,000 < 6.3 < 6.2 < 5.7 -- 30
4-Ethyltoluene < 25 < 6.6 < 100 < 6.6 160 75,000 < 6.3 < 6.2 < 5.7 -- --
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 25 < 6.6 < 100 < 6.6 120 41,000 < 6.3 < 6.2 < 5.7 -- 1.9
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene < 25 < 6.6 < 100 < 6.6 140 100,000 < 6.3 < 6.2 < 5.7 -- 1.9
1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 31 < 8.1 < 130 8.0 J < 20 < 1,900 12 < 7.6 35 0.051 --
Notes:
bold = detection
TCE = Trichloroethene
µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
SIM = Selective Ion Monitoring
DTSC SL = Department of Toxic Substances Control Screening Levels for Ambient Air, Residential Air, April 2019.
EPA RSL = Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels, Residential Air, TR = 1E-06, THQ = 1.0, November 2019.
SFBRWQCB ESL = San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board Environmental Screening Levels. Vapor ESL, Residential Indoor Air, Rev. 2 2019.
APPENDIX A
CITY OF FRESNO MONITORING WELL PERMIT
___________________________________________________________________________________
APPENDIX B
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD SHEETS
___________________________________________________________________________________
APPENDIX C
VMP CONSTRUCTION AND BORING LOGS
___________________________________________________________________________________
PLOTTED: 03/03/2020 09:16 AM BY: AAhTye
SAMPLE/SAMPLER TYPE GRAPHICS UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (ASTM D 2487)
WELL-GRADED GRAVELS,
GEOPROBE SAMPLER CLEAN Cu >_4 and GW GRAVEL-SAND MIXTURES WITH
GRAVEL 1_< Cc_< 3
GRAVELS (More than half of coarse fraction is larger than the #4 sieve)
LITTLE OR NO FINES
WITH
GROUND WATER GRAPHICS <5% POORLY GRADED GRAVELS,
WATER LEVEL (level where first observed) FINES Cu <4 and/ GP GRAVEL-SAND MIXTURES WITH
or 1>Cc > 3 LITTLE OR NO FINES
WATER LEVEL (level after exploration completion) WELL-GRADED GRAVELS,
WATER LEVEL (additional levels after exploration) GW-GM GRAVEL-SAND MIXTURES WITH
Cu >_4 and LITTLE FINES
OBSERVED SEEPAGE 1<_ Cc_< 3 WELL-GRADED GRAVELS,
GRAVELS GW-GC GRAVEL-SAND MIXTURES WITH
NOTES WITH LITTLE CLAY FINES
The report and graphics key are an integral part of these logs. All data 5% TO
and interpretations in this log are subject to the explanations and 12% POORLY GRADED GRAVELS,
limitations stated in the report. FINES GP-GM GRAVEL-SAND MIXTURES WITH
COARSE GRAINED SOILS (More than half of material is larger than the #200 sieve)
Cu <4 and/ LITTLE FINES
Lines separating strata on the logs represent approximate boundaries
or 1>Cc > 3 POORLY GRADED GRAVELS,
only. Actual transitions may be gradual or differ from those shown.
GP-GC GRAVEL-SAND MIXTURES WITH
No warranty is provided as to the continuity of soil or rock conditions LITTLE CLAY FINES
between individual sample locations.
Logs represent general soil or rock conditions observed at the point of SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SILT-SAND
GM MIXTURES
exploration on the date indicated.
In general, Unified Soil Classification System designations presented GRAVELS

on the logs were based on visual classification in the field and were WITH > CLAYEY GRAVELS,
12% GC GRAVEL-SAND-CLAY MIXTURES
modified where appropriate based on gradation and index property testing.
FINES
Fine grained soils that plot within the hatched area on the Plasticity
Chart, and coarse grained soils with between 5% and 12% passing the No. CLAYEY GRAVELS,
GC-GM GRAVEL-SAND-CLAY-SILT MIXTURES
200 sieve require dual USCS symbols, ie., GW-GM, GP-GM, GW-GC,
GP-GC, GC-GM, SW-SM, SP-SM, SW-SC, SP-SC, SC-SM.
If sampler is not able to be driven at least 6 inches then 50/X indicates WELL-GRADED SANDS,
number of blows required to drive the identified sampler X inches with a CLEAN Cu >_6 and SW SAND-GRAVEL MIXTURES WITH
140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. SANDS 1<_ Cc_< 3 LITTLE OR NO FINES
SANDS (Half or more of coarse fraction is smaller than the #4 sieve)
WITH
ABBREVIATIONS <5% POORLY GRADED SANDS,
WOH - Weight of Hammer FINES Cu <6 and/ SP SAND-GRAVEL MIXTURES WITH
WOR - Weight of Rod or 1>Cc > 3 LITTLE OR NO FINES
WELL-GRADED SANDS,
SW-SM SAND-GRAVEL MIXTURES WITH
Cu >_6 and LITTLE FINES
1_< Cc_< 3 WELL-GRADED SANDS,
OFFICE FILTER: FRESNO
SANDS SW-SC SAND-GRAVEL MIXTURES WITH

WITH LITTLE CLAY FINES
5% TO
12% POORLY GRADED SANDS,
FINES SP-SM SAND-GRAVEL MIXTURES WITH
LITTLE FINES
gINT TEMPLATE: E:KLF_STANDARD_GINT_LIBRARY_2020.GLB [__KLF_GEO-LEG1 (GRAPHICS KEY) WITH USCS]
Cu <6 and/
or 1>Cc > 3 POORLY GRADED SANDS,
SP-SC SAND-GRAVEL MIXTURES WITH
LITTLE CLAY FINES
SILTY SANDS, SAND-GRAVEL-SILT

SM MIXTURES
SANDS
WITH > CLAYEY SANDS,
12% SC SAND-GRAVEL-CLAY MIXTURES
PROJECT NUMBER: 20203368.001A
FINES
CLAYEY SANDS, SAND-SILT-CLAY
SC-SM MIXTURES
INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE SANDS, SILTY OR

ML CLAYEY FINE SANDS, SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY
(Half or more of material is
FINE GRAINED SOILS
INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY

SILTS AND CLAYS CL CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS
the #200 sieve)
(Liquid Limit INORGANIC CLAYS-SILTS OF LOW PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY

smaller than
less than 50) CL-ML CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS
ORGANIC SILTS & ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF
OL LOW PLASTICITY
INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR
MH DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR SILT
SILTS AND CLAYS
INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT
(Liquid Limit CH CLAYS
50 or greater)
ORGANIC CLAYS & ORGANIC SILTS OF
OH MEDIUM-TO-HIGH PLASTICITY
gINT FILE: Klf_gint_master_2020
PROJECT NO.: PLATE

GRAPHICS KEY
20203368.001A
DRAWN BY:
FORMER IMPERIAL CLEANERS B-1
CHECKED BY: 2165 S. ELM STREET
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
DATE:
PLOTTED: 03/03/2020 09:17 AM BY: AAhTye
GRAIN SIZE
DESCRIPTION SIEVE SIZE GRAIN SIZE APPROXIMATE SIZE
Boulders >12 in. (304.8 mm.) >12 in. (304.8 mm.) Larger than basketball-sized
Cobbles 3 - 12 in. (76.2 - 304.8 mm.) 3 - 12 in. (76.2 - 304.8 mm.) Fist-sized to basketball-sized
coarse 3/4 -3 in. (19 - 76.2 mm.) 3/4 -3 in. (19 - 76.2 mm.) Thumb-sized to fist-sized
Gravel
fine #4 - 3/4 in. (#4 - 19 mm.) 0.19 - 0.75 in. (4.8 - 19 mm.) Pea-sized to thumb-sized
coarse #10 - #4 0.079 - 0.19 in. (2 - 4.9 mm.) Rock salt-sized to pea-sized
Sand medium #40 - #10 0.017 - 0.079 in. (0.43 - 2 mm.) Sugar-sized to rock salt-sized
fine #200 - #40 0.0029 - 0.017 in. (0.07 - 0.43 mm.) Flour-sized to sugar-sized
Fines Passing #200 <0.0029 in. (<0.07 mm.) Flour-sized and smaller
SECONDARY CONSTITUENT MOISTURE CONTENT CEMENTATION

AMOUNT DESCRIPTION FIELD TEST DESCRIPTION FIELD TEST
Absence of Crumbles or breaks
Term Secondary Secondary Dry moisture, dusty, Weakly with handling or slight
of Constituent is Constituent is dry to the touch finger pressure
Use Fine Grained Coarse Grained
Crumbles or breaks
Damp but no
Moist Moderately with considerable finger
Trace <5% <15% visible water
pressure
With 5 to <15% 15 to <30% Visible free water, Will not crumble or

Wet usually soil is below Strongly break with finger
Modifier 15% 30% water table pressure
CONSISTENCY - FINE-GRAINED SOIL REACTION WITH

HYDROCHLORIC ACID
UNCONFINED
SPT - N60 Pocket Pen
CONSISTENCY COMPRESSIVE VISUAL / MANUAL CRITERIA
(# blows / ft) (tsf) DESCRIPTION FIELD TEST
STRENGTH (Qu)(psf)
Thumb will penetrate more than 1 inch (25 mm). Extrudes
Very Soft <2 PP < 0.25 <500 None No visible reaction
between fingers when squeezed.
Thumb will penetrate soil about 1 inch (25 mm).
Soft 2-4 0.25 PP <0.5 500 - 1000 Some reaction,
Remolded by light finger pressure.
Weak with bubbles
Thumb will penetrate soil about 1/4 inch (6 mm). forming slowly
Medium Stiff 4-8 0.5 PP <1 1000 - 2000
Remolded by strong finger pressure.
Violent reaction,
Stiff 8 - 15 1 PP <2 2000 - 4000 Can be imprinted with considerable pressure from thumb. with bubbles
Strong
forming
immediately
Thumb will not indent soil but readily indented with
Very Stiff 15 - 30 2 PP <4 4000 - 8000
thumbnail.
Hard >30 4 PP >8000 Thumbnail will not indent soil.
FROM TERZAGHI AND PECK, 1948; LAMBE AND WHITMAN, 1969; FHWA, 2002; AND ASTM D2488
APPARENT / RELATIVE DENSITY - COARSE-GRAINED SOIL PLASTICITY
MODIFIED CA CALIFORNIA RELATIVE DESCRIPTION LL FIELD TEST
APPARENT SPT-N60
SAMPLER SAMPLER DENSITY
DENSITY (# blows/ft) A 1/8-in. (3 mm.) thread cannot be rolled at any water
gINT TEMPLATE: E:KLF_STANDARD_GINT_LIBRARY_2020.GLB [AE_KLF_GEO-LEG2 (SOIL DESC KEY)]
(# blows/ft) (# blows/ft) (%) Non-plastic NP

content.
Very Loose <4 <4 <5 0 - 15 The thread can barely be rolled and the lump or thread
Low (L) < 30
cannot be formed when drier than the plastic limit.
Loose 4 - 10 5 - 12 5 - 15 15 - 35 The thread is easy to roll and not much time is required to
reach the plastic limit. The thread cannot be rerolled after
Medium (M) 30 - 50
Medium Dense 10 - 30 12 - 35 15 - 40 35 - 65 reaching the plastic limit. The lump or thread crumbles when
drier than the plastic limit.
Dense 30 - 50 35 - 60 40 - 70 65 - 85 It takes considerable time rolling and kneading to reach the

plastic limit. The thread can be rerolled several times after
High (H) > 50
Very Dense >50 >60 >70 85 - 100 reaching the plastic limit. The lump or thread can be formed
without crumbling when drier than the plastic limit.
FROM TERZAGHI AND PECK, 1948
STRUCTURE ANGULARITY
DESCRIPTION CRITERIA DESCRIPTION CRITERIA

Alternating layers of varying material or color with layers at Particles have sharp edges and relatively plane sides with unpolished
Stratified Angular
least 1/4-in. thick, note thickness. surfaces.
Alternating layers of varying material or color with the layer
Laminated
less than 1/4-in. thick, note thickness. Subangular Particles are similar to angular description but have rounded edges.
Breaks along definite planes of fracture with
Fissured
little resistance to fracturing. Particles have nearly plane sides but have well-rounded corners and
Subrounded
Slickensided Fracture planes appear polished or glossy, sometimes striated. edges.
Cohesive soil that can be broken down into small angular lumps Rounded Particles have smoothly curved sides and no edges.
Blocky
which resist further breakdown.
Inclusion of small pockets of different soils, such as small lenses
Lensed
of sand scattered through a mass of clay; note thickness.
PROJECT NO.: PLATE

SOIL DESCRIPTION KEY
20203368.001A
DRAWN BY: AA
CHECKED BY: SPP 2165 S. ELM STREET
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
DATE:
PLOTTED: 03/03/2020 02:23 PM BY: AAhTye
Date Begin - End: 2/18/2020 - 2/19/2020 Drilling Company: GeoEx MONITORING WELL LOG IL-MW-1
Logged By: A. AhTye Drill Crew: T. Scott
Hor.-Vert. Datum: Not Available Drilling Equipment: Geoprobe 7722DT and CME-55
Plunge: -90 degrees Drilling Method: See Drilling Method Column
Weather: Not Available Exploration Diameter:

FIELD EXPLORATION MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION
(NR=No Recovery)
PID / FID (ppmv)

Completion Method:
Sample Number
Drilling Method
Flush mount cap in concrete
Graphical Log
Sample Type
Surface Condition: Bare Earth

Depth (feet)
FID (ppmv)
Recovery
Lithologic Description
Sandy Lean CLAY (CL): low plasticity, brown, moist, `
strong cemented
5
Sandy SILT (ML): brown, moist, strong cemented
10
Silty SAND (SM): fine-grained, brown, moist

15 2" SCH 40 Solid PVC Riser
0
Grout
20
0
gINT TEMPLATE: E:KLF_STANDARD_GINT_LIBRARY_2020.GLB [_KLF_ENVIRONMENTAL LOG]
Sandy SILT (ML): low plasticity, olive brown, moist, trace

clay
25
0
30
0 moist to wet, iron oxide staining
Silty SAND (SM): fine-grained, light gray, moist
Lean CLAY (CL): low plasticity, olive brown, moist

PROJECT NO.: PLATE

MONITORING WELL LOG IL-MW-1
20203368.001A
DRAWN BY: AA
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
DATE:
PAGE: 1 of 4

(NR=No Recovery)
PID / FID (ppmv)

Completion Method:
Sample Number
Drilling Method
Graphical Log
Sample Type

Depth (feet)
FID (ppmv)
Recovery
0 Silty SAND (SM): fine-grained, grayish brown, moist
Lean CLAY (CL): medium plasticity, brown, moist
0 Sandy SILT (ML): brown, moist

40
45
50
2" SCH 40 Solid PVC Riser
Grout
55
60
Sandy Lean CLAY (CL): low plasticity, brown, moist
65
PROJECT NO.: PLATE

20203368.001A
DRAWN BY: AA
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
DATE:
PAGE: 2 of 4

(NR=No Recovery)
PID / FID (ppmv)

Completion Method:
Sample Number
Drilling Method
Graphical Log
Sample Type

Depth (feet)
FID (ppmv)
Recovery
Grout
75
2" SCH 40 Solid PVC Riser
Hydrated Bentonite
80
85
90
Sand
95 2" SCH 40 Slotted 0.010

PVC Screen
100
PROJECT NO.: PLATE

20203368.001A
DRAWN BY: AA
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
DATE:
PAGE: 3 of 4

(NR=No Recovery)
PID / FID (ppmv)

Completion Method:
Sample Number
Drilling Method
Graphical Log
Sample Type

Depth (feet)
FID (ppmv)
Recovery
110
2" SCH 40 Slotted 0.010
PVC Screen
Sand
115
120
GROUNDWATER LEVEL INFORMATION:

The exploration was terminated at approximately 120 ft. below ground surface. Groundwater was observed at approximately 102 ft. below ground
surface during drilling.
GENERAL NOTES:
A PID (ppmv) was used for environmental field screening calibrated
on February 18, 2019.
The monitoring well was backfilled with sand and grout
125
130
135
PROJECT NO.: PLATE

20203368.001A
DRAWN BY: AA
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
DATE:
PAGE: 4 of 4
Date Begin - End: 2/18/2020 - 2/18/2020 Drilling Company: GeoEx BORING LOG SB-1
Hor.-Vert. Datum: Not Available Drilling Equipment: Geoprobe 7822DT

FIELD EXPLORATION
(NR=No Recovery)
PID / FID (ppmv)

Sample Number
Drilling Method
Graphical Log
Sample Type

Depth (feet)
Recovery
Sandy SILT (ML): brown, moist, trace clay
strong cemented
5
10
olive brown
15
0 Sandy SILT (ML): grayish brown, moist
incresed fine sand
20
0
brownish gray, decreased fine sand

25
0
Silty SAND (SM): brownish gray, moist, fine
Lean CLAY (CL): medium plasticity, olive brown, moist

30
Lean CLAY (CL): medium plasticity, olive brown, moist
Sandy SILT (ML): brown, moist

PROJECT NO.: PLATE

BORING LOG SB-1
20203368.001A
DRAWN BY: AA
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
DATE:
PAGE: 1 of 2

FIELD EXPLORATION
(NR=No Recovery)
PID / FID (ppmv)

Sample Number
Drilling Method
Graphical Log
Sample Type

Depth (feet)
Recovery
brownish gray
brown
0
40

The exploration was terminated at approximately 40 ft. below ground surface. Groundwater was not observed during drilling or after completion.
GENERAL NOTES:
The boring was backfilled with grout
45
50
55
60
65
PROJECT NO.: PLATE

BORING LOG SB-1
20203368.001A
DRAWN BY: AA
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
DATE:
PAGE: 2 of 2

FIELD EXPLORATION
(NR=No Recovery)
PID / FID (ppmv)

Sample Number
Drilling Method
Graphical Log
Sample Type

Depth (feet)
Recovery
Sandy SILT (ML): low plasticity, brown, moist
non-plastic, strong cemented

5
10
gray, weak cemented, increased sand
78 not visibly cemented, decreased sand
15
187
20
320
25
685
30
575
PROJECT NO.: PLATE

BORING LOG SB-2
20203368.001A
DRAWN BY: AA
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
DATE:
PAGE: 1 of 2

FIELD EXPLORATION
(NR=No Recovery)
PID / FID (ppmv)

Sample Number
Drilling Method
Graphical Log
Sample Type

Depth (feet)
Recovery
792 Sandy SILT (ML): low plasticity, brown, moist
brown, increased sand
620
40

GENERAL NOTES:
45
50
55
60
65
PROJECT NO.: PLATE

BORING LOG SB-2
20203368.001A
DRAWN BY: AA
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
DATE:
PAGE: 2 of 2

FIELD EXPLORATION
(NR=No Recovery)
PID / FID (ppmv)

Sample Number
Drilling Method
Graphical Log
Sample Type

Depth (feet)
Recovery
5
0 increased sand
olive brown, decreased sand
0
10

GENERAL NOTES:
15
20
25
30
PROJECT NO.: PLATE

BORING LOG SB-3
20203368.001A
DRAWN BY: AA
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
DATE:
PAGE: 1 of 1

FIELD EXPLORATION
(NR=No Recovery)
PID / FID (ppmv)

Sample Number
Drilling Method
Graphical Log
Sample Type

Depth (feet)
Recovery
5
0
weak cemented
0
10

GENERAL NOTES:
15
20
25
30
PROJECT NO.: PLATE

BORING LOG SB-4
20203368.001A
DRAWN BY: AA
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
DATE:
PAGE: 1 of 1

FIELD EXPLORATION
(NR=No Recovery)
PID / FID (ppmv)

Sample Number
Drilling Method
Graphical Log
Sample Type

Depth (feet)
Recovery
5
0 moderate cemented
0
10

GENERAL NOTES:
15
20
25
30
PROJECT NO.: PLATE

BORING LOG SB-5
20203368.001A
DRAWN BY: AA
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
DATE:
PAGE: 1 of 1
Date Begin - End: 2/18/2020 - 2/19/2020 Drilling Company: GeoEx BORING LOG VMP-1
Hor.-Vert. Datum: Not Available Drilling Equipment: Hand Auger and Geoprobe 7722DT

FIELD EXPLORATION
(NR=No Recovery)
PID / FID (ppmv)

Sample Number
Drilling Method
Graphical Log
Sample Type

Depth (feet)
Recovery
Sandy SILT (ML): brown, moist Sand
strong cemented
5
Hydrated Bentonite
not visibly cemented
10
Bentonite Chips
Sand
15
Soil Vapor Probe

GENERAL NOTES:
The boring was backfilled with sand, vapor probe, and bentonite
20
25
30
PROJECT NO.: PLATE

BORING LOG VMP-1
20203368.001A
DRAWN BY: AA
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
DATE:
PAGE: 1 of 1

FIELD EXPLORATION
(NR=No Recovery)
PID / FID (ppmv)

Sample Number
Drilling Method
Graphical Log
Sample Type

Depth (feet)
Recovery
Hydrated Bentonite
Bentonite Chips
Sand
Soil Vapor Probe
Hydrated Bentonite
10
Bentonite Chips
Sand
Soil Vapor Probe
15

The exploration was terminated at approximately 14.67 ft. below ground surface. Groundwater was not observed during drilling or after completion.
GENERAL NOTES:
20
25
30
PROJECT NO.: PLATE

BORING LOG VMP-2
20203368.001A
DRAWN BY: AA
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
DATE:
PAGE: 1 of 1
Hor.-Vert. Datum: Not Available Drilling Equipment: Hand Auger

FIELD EXPLORATION
(NR=No Recovery)
PID / FID (ppmv)

Sample Number
Drilling Method
Graphical Log
Sample Type

Depth (feet)
Recovery
Hydrated Bentonite
Bentonite Chips
Sand
Soil vapor probe
5
GENERAL NOTES:
10
15
20
25
30
PROJECT NO.: PLATE

BORING LOG VMP-3
20203368.001A
DRAWN BY: AA
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
DATE:
PAGE: 1 of 1

FIELD EXPLORATION
(NR=No Recovery)
PID / FID (ppmv)

Sample Number
Drilling Method
Graphical Log
Sample Type

Depth (feet)
Recovery
Hydrated Bentonite
Bentonite Chips
Sand
Soil Vapor Probe
strong cemented
5
Hydrated Bentonite
10
Bentonite Chips
Sand
Soil Vapor Probe

15

GENERAL NOTES:
20
25
30
PROJECT NO.: PLATE

BORING LOG VMP-4
20203368.001A
DRAWN BY: AA
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
DATE:
PAGE: 1 of 1
Hor.-Vert. Datum: Not Available Drilling Equipment: Hand Auger

FIELD EXPLORATION
(NR=No Recovery)
PID / FID (ppmv)

Sample Number
Drilling Method
Graphical Log
Sample Type

Depth (feet)
Recovery
Hydrated Bentonite
Bentonite Chips
Sand
Soil Vapor Probe
5
GENERAL NOTES:
10
15
20
25
30
PROJECT NO.: PLATE

BORING LOG VMP-5
20203368.001A
DRAWN BY: AA
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
DATE:
PAGE: 1 of 1

FIELD EXPLORATION
(NR=No Recovery)
PID / FID (ppmv)

Sample Number
Drilling Method
Graphical Log
Sample Type

Depth (feet)
Recovery
Hydrated Bentonite
Bentonite Chips
Sand
strong cemented Soil Vapor Probe
Hydrated Bentonite
10
Bentonite Chips
Sand
15
Soil Vapor Probe

GENERAL NOTES:
20
25
30
PROJECT NO.: PLATE

BORING LOG VMP-6
20203368.001A
DRAWN BY: AA
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
DATE:
PAGE: 1 of 1
APPENDIX D
SOIL VAPOR FIELD SHEETS
___________________________________________________________________________________
APPENDIX E
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS
___________________________________________________________________________________
908 North Temperance Ave. ∇ Clovis, CA 93611 ∇ Phone 559-275-2175 ∇ Fax 559-275-4422
State Certification Number: CA1312 (WW & DW)

NELAP Certification Number: CA00046 (HW)
March 4, 2020
Kleinfelder
2882 Prospect Park Dr Ste 200
Attn: Bill Schmierer

Subject: Report of Data: Case 91507
Results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody. This
analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Dear Mr. Schmierer:
One water samples for project “20203368” were received February 24, 2020. Written results are being
provided on this March 4, 2020, for the requested analyses. All holding times were met.
For the EPA 8015B TPH-e analysis, the sample was extracted according to EPA method
3510C.
For the EPA 8260B analysis, the sample was purged according to EPA method 5030B.
No unusual problem or complication was encountered with this sample set.
If you have any questions or require further information, please contact us at your convenience.
Thank you for choosing APPL, Inc.
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, both
technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. These test results meet
all requirements of NELAC. Release of the hard copy has been authorized by the Laboratory
Manager or her designee, as verified by the following signature.
Paula McCartney, Laboratory Director

APPL, Inc.
PM/lac
Enclosure
cc: File
91507 Schmierer.doc
EPA 8015B TPH DIESEL MO
Kleinfelder APPL Inc.
2882 Prospect Park Dr STE 200 908 North Temperance Avenue
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Clovis, CA 93611

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91507
Sample ID: 1L-MW-1 APPL ID: BA07578
Sample Collection Date: 02/24/20 QCG: #TPHO-200227A-250372
Extraction Analysis
Method Analyte Result PQL MDL Units Date Date
EPA 8015B-e DIESEL FUEL Not detected 50.0 25.00 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8015B-e MOTOR OIL Not detected 500 106.0 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8015B-e SURROGATE: OCTACOSANE (S) 70.5 28-142 % 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8015B-e SURROGATE: ORTHO-TERPHENYL ( 78.5 45-145 % 02/27/20 02/27/20
Quant Method: TPHD0214.M

Run #: 214156
Instrument: Apollo
Sequence: 200214
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: SSE
Printed: 03/02/20 12:14:56 PM
APPL-F1-SC-NoMC-REG MDLs
EPA 8260B

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91507
Sample Collection Date: 02/24/20 QCG: #8260-200227AT-250344
Extraction Analysis
EPA 8260B 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE Not detected 0.5 0.13 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE Not detected 0.5 0.14 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE Not detected 0.5 0.10 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE Not detected 0.5 0.20 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE Not detected 1.0 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE Not detected 0.5 0.25 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B 1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 24 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE Not detected 0.5 0.14 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B 1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 22 0.5 0.12 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B 4-ETHYLTOLUENE 58 0.5 0.20 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B BENZENE 62 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B BROMOBENZENE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B BROMODICHLOROMETHANE Not detected 0.5 0.14 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B BROMOFORM Not detected 0.5 0.14 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B BROMOMETHANE Not detected 1.0 0.24 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B CARBON TETRACHLORIDE Not detected 0.5 0.10 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B CHLOROBENZENE Not detected 0.5 0.21 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B CHLOROETHANE Not detected 0.5 0.21 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B CHLOROFORM Not detected 0.5 0.07 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B CHLOROMETHANE 25 0.5 0.25 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B DIBROMOMETHANE Not detected 0.5 0.20 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE Not detected 1.0 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B ETHYL BENZENE 11 0.5 0.23 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B FREON-113 Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B METHYLENE CHLORIDE Not detected 5.0 0.35 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B MTBE 5400 E 1.0 0.26 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B N-PROPYLBENZENE 0.69 0.5 0.21 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B TETRACHLOROETHENE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
E = The reported value exceeds linear range. Quant Method: T0226W.M

Run #: 0227T25
Instrument: Thor
Sequence: T200226
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/09/20 3:27:02 PM
EPA 8260B

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91507
Sample Collection Date: 02/24/20 QCG: #8260-200227AT-250344
Extraction Analysis
EPA 8260B TOLUENE 18 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B TRICHLOROETHENE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE Not detected 0.5 0.24 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B VINYL CHLORIDE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B XYLENES 300 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B SURROGATE: 1,2-DICHLOROETHAN 97.8 70-125 % 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B SURROGATE: 4-BROMOFLUOROBEN 95.6 72-133 % 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B SURROGATE: DIBROMOFLUOROME 93.3 78-125 % 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B SURROGATE: TOLUENE-D8 (S) 96.0 73-124 % 02/27/20 02/27/20
E = The reported value exceeds linear range. Quant Method: T0226W.M

Run #: 0227T25
Instrument: Thor
Sequence: T200226
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/09/20 3:27:02 PM
EPA 8260B

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91507
Sample Collection Date: 02/24/20 QCG: #8260D-200228AT-250365
Extraction Analysis
EPA 8260B MTBE 37000 1000.0 260.00 ug/L 02/28/20 02/28/20

EPA 8260B SURROGATE: 1,2-DICHLOROETHAN 103 70-125 % 02/28/20 02/28/20
EPA 8260B SURROGATE: DIBROMOFLUOROME 100 78-125 % 02/28/20 02/28/20
Quant Method: T0226W.M

Run #: 0228T12
Instrument: Thor
Sequence: T200226
Dilution Factor: 1000
Initials: CMO
Printed: 03/09/20 4:17:07 PM
EPA 8260B GRO WATER

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91507
Sample Collection Date: 02/24/20 QCG: #GRO86-200227AT-250350
Extraction Analysis
EPA 8260B GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS 18000 E ++ 20 8.6 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
E = The reported value exceeds linear range. Quant Method: TSUR0226.M

++(G5) The analyst has noted that the chromatogram of this sample is mainly a dominant Run #: 0227T25
peak(s) which is not indicative of petroleum hydrocarbons. Instrument: Thor
Sequence: T200226
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/04/20 12:29:32 PM
EPA 8260B GRO WATER DILUTION

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91507
Extraction Analysis
EPA 8260B GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS 29000 ++ 1000 430.0 ug/L 03/04/20 03/04/20
++(G5) The analyst has noted that the chromatogram of this sample is mainly a dominant Quant Method: TGAS0219.M
peak(s) which is not indicative of petroleum hydrocarbons. Run #: 0304T08
Instrument: Thor
Sequence: T200226
Dilution Factor: 50
Initials: CMO
Printed: 03/04/20 12:31:03 PM
Method Blank
APPL Inc.
Blank Name/QCG: 200227W-07577 - 250372 908 North Temperance Avenu
Batch ID: #TPHO-200227A Clovis, CA 93611
Sample Type Analyte Result PQL MDL Units Extraction Date Analysis Date
BLANK DIESEL FUEL Not detected 50.0 25.00 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK MOTOR OIL Not detected 500 106.0 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK SURROGATE: OCTACOSANE (S) 80.5 28-142 % 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK SURROGATE: ORTHO-TERPHENYL ( 84.5 45-145 % 02/27/20 02/27/20
Quant Method:TPHD0214.M
Run #:214152
Instrument: Apollo
Sequence: 200214
Initials: SSE
GC SC-Blank-REG MDLs
Printed: 03/02/20 12:14:55 PM
Laboratory Control Spike Recovery
APPL ID: 200227W-07577 LCS - 250372 APPL Inc.

Batch ID: #TPHO-200227A 908 North Temperance Avenue
Clovis, CA 93611
Compound Name Spike Level SPK Result SPK % Recovery

ug/L ug/L Recovery Limits
DIESEL FUEL 2000 1510 75.5 61-143
MOTOR OIL 2000 1530 76.5 40-140
SURROGATE: OCTACOSANE (S) 150 123 82.0 28-142

SURROGATE: ORTHO-TERPHENYL (S) 150 117 78.0 45-145
Primary SPK
Quant Method : TPHD0214.M
Extraction Date : 02/27/20
Analysis Date : 02/27/20
Comments:
Instrument : Apollo
Run : 214153
Initials : SSE
Printed: 03/02/20 12:14:57 PM

APPL Standard LCS
Method Blank
EPA 8260B
APPL Inc.
Batch ID: #8260-200227AT Clovis, CA 93611
BLANK 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE Not detected 0.5 0.13 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20

BLANK 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE Not detected 0.5 0.14 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE Not detected 0.5 0.10 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE Not detected 0.5 0.20 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE Not detected 1.0 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE Not detected 0.5 0.25 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK 1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE Not detected 0.5 0.14 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK 1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE Not detected 0.5 0.12 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK 4-ETHYLTOLUENE Not detected 0.5 0.20 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK BENZENE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK BROMOBENZENE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK BROMODICHLOROMETHANE Not detected 0.5 0.14 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK BROMOFORM Not detected 0.5 0.14 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK BROMOMETHANE Not detected 1.0 0.24 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK CARBON TETRACHLORIDE Not detected 0.5 0.10 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK CHLOROBENZENE Not detected 0.5 0.21 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK CHLOROETHANE Not detected 0.5 0.21 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK CHLOROFORM Not detected 0.5 0.07 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK CHLOROMETHANE Not detected 0.5 0.25 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK DIBROMOMETHANE Not detected 0.5 0.20 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE Not detected 1.0 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK ETHYL BENZENE Not detected 0.5 0.23 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK FREON-113 Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK METHYLENE CHLORIDE Not detected 5.0 0.35 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK MTBE Not detected 1.0 0.26 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK N-PROPYLBENZENE Not detected 0.5 0.21 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
Quant Method:T0226W.M
Run #:0227T07
Instrument:Thor
Sequence: T200226
Initials:DPO
Printed: 03/09/20 3:27:12 PM
Method Blank
EPA 8260B
APPL Inc.
Batch ID: #8260-200227AT Clovis, CA 93611
BLANK TETRACHLOROETHENE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20

BLANK TOLUENE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK TRICHLOROETHENE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE Not detected 0.5 0.24 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK VINYL CHLORIDE Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK XYLENES Not detected 0.5 0.15 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK SURROGATE: 1,2-DICHLOROETHAN 104 70-125 % 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK SURROGATE: 4-BROMOFLUOROBEN 96.8 72-133 % 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK SURROGATE: DIBROMOFLUOROMET 101 78-125 % 02/27/20 02/27/20
BLANK SURROGATE: TOLUENE-D8 (S) 100 73-124 % 02/27/20 02/27/20
Run #:0227T07
Instrument:Thor
Sequence: T200226
Initials:DPO
Printed: 03/09/20 3:27:12 PM
Method Blank
EPA 8260B
APPL Inc.
Batch ID: #8260D-200228AT Clovis, CA 93611
BLANK MTBE Not detected 1.0 0.26 ug/L 02/28/20 02/28/20

BLANK SURROGATE: 4-BROMOFLUOROBEN 104 72-133 % 02/28/20 02/28/20
Quant Method:TSUR0226.M
Run #:0228T09
Instrument:Thor
Sequence: T200226
Initials: CMO
Printed: 03/09/20 4:17:17 PM
EPA 8260B

Batch ID: #8260-200227AT 908 North Temperance Avenue
Clovis, CA 93611

1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 10.00 10.7 107 73-124
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 10.00 10.9 109 67-125
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 10.00 8.04 80.4 71-127
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 10.00 10.7 107 74-121
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 10.00 11.0 110 62-132
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 10.00 9.93 99.3 70-125
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 10.00 10.3 103 75-125
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 10.00 10.1 101 70-129
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 10.00 9.68 96.8 68-123
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 10.00 10.3 103 77-125
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 10.00 10.8 108 75-125
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 10.00 10.2 102 69-129
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 10.00 9.79 97.9 71-126
4-ETHYLTOLUENE 10.00 10.3 103 75-125
BENZENE 10.00 10.5 105 68-124
BROMOBENZENE 10.00 9.78 97.8 65-130
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 10.00 11.2 112 69-124
BROMOFORM 10.00 10.5 105 67-125
BROMOMETHANE 10.00 11.8 118 71-131
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 10.00 11.6 116 70-122
CHLOROBENZENE 10.00 10.4 104 72-125
CHLOROETHANE 10.00 11.1 111 78-125
CHLOROFORM 10.00 10.4 104 69-122
CHLOROMETHANE 10.00 10.9 109 71-124
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 10.00 9.72 97.2 72-123
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10.00 9.44 94.4 70-125
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 10.00 10.5 105 70-125
DIBROMOMETHANE 10.00 10.4 104 66-126
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE 10.00 10.2 102 68-131
ETHYL BENZENE 10.00 10.4 104 70-123
FREON-113 10.00 10.9 109 74-138
Primary SPK
Quant Method : T0226W.M
Comments: Analysis Date : 02/27/20

Instrument : Thor
Run : 0227T01
Initials : DPO
Printed: 03/09/20 3:26:47 PM

APPL Standard LCS
EPA 8260B

Batch ID: #8260-200227AT 908 North Temperance Avenue
Clovis, CA 93611

METHYLENE CHLORIDE 10.00 10.2 102 78-118
MTBE 10.00 10.0 100 72-125
N-PROPYLBENZENE 10.00 10.4 104 75-125
TETRACHLOROETHENE 10.00 9.75 97.5 62-136
TOLUENE 10.00 10.5 105 69-122
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 10.00 10.3 103 68-126
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10.00 9.47 94.7 62-127
TRICHLOROETHENE 10.00 11.1 111 70-128
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 10.00 10.0 100 66-132
VINYL CHLORIDE 10.00 9.71 97.1 79-138
XYLENES 30.0 31.2 104 73-145
SURROGATE: 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE-D 25.0 25.0 100 70-125

SURROGATE: 4-BROMOFLUOROBENZE 25.0 24.5 98.0 72-133
SURROGATE: DIBROMOFLUOROMETH 25.0 24.8 99.2 78-125
SURROGATE: TOLUENE-D8 (S) 25.0 24.4 97.6 73-124
Primary SPK

Instrument : Thor
Run : 0227T01
Initials : DPO
Printed: 03/09/20 3:26:47 PM

APPL Standard LCS
EPA 8260B

Batch ID: #8260D-200228AT 908 North Temperance Avenue
Clovis, CA 93611

MTBE 10.00 10.0 100 72-125

SURROGATE: DIBROMOFLUOROMETH 25.0 26.0 104 78-125
SURROGATE: TOLUENE-D8 (S) 25.0 25.4 102 73-124
Primary SPK

Instrument : Thor
Run : 0228T06
Initials : CMO
Printed: 03/09/20 4:16:52 PM

APPL Standard LCS
Method Blank
EPA 8260B GRO WATER
APPL Inc.
Batch ID: #GRO86-200227AT Clovis, CA 93611
BLANK GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS Not detected 20 8.6 ug/L 02/27/20 02/27/20
Quant Method:TGAS0219.M
Run #:0227T07
Instrument: Thor
Sequence: T200226
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/04/20 12:29:32 PM
Method Blank
APPL Inc.
BLANK GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS Not detected 20 8.6 ug/L 03/04/20 03/04/20
Run #:0304T06
Instrument: Thor
Sequence: T200226
Initials: CMO
Printed: 03/04/20 12:31:03 PM
EPA 8260B GRO WATER

Batch ID: #GRO86-200227AT 908 North Temperance Avenue
Clovis, CA 93611

GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS 300 280 93.3 78-122
Primary SPK
Quant Method : TGAS0219.M
Comments:
Instrument : Thor
Run : 0227T03
Initials : DPO
Printed: 03/04/20 12:29:32 PM

APPL Standard LCS

Clovis, CA 93611

GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS 300 272 90.7 78-122
SURROGATE: 4-BROMOFLUOROBENZE 25.0 25.0 100 85-114
Primary SPK
Comments:
Instrument : Thor
Run : 0304T05
Initials : CMO
Printed: 03/04/20 12:31:04 PM

APPL Standard LCS
908 North Temperance Ave. ∇ Clovis, CA 93611 ∇ Phone 559-275-2175 ∇ Fax 559-275-4422
State Certification Number: CA1312 (WW & DW)

NELAP Certification Number: CA00046 (HW)
March 13, 2020
Kleinfelder
2882 Prospect Park Dr Ste 200

Subject: Report of Data: Case 91457
Results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody. This
analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Dear Mr. Schmierer:
Twelve soil samples for project “20203368” were received February 19, 2020. Written results are
being provided on this March 13, 2020, for the requested analyses. All holding times were met.
For the EPA 8015B TPH-e analysis, the samples were extracted according to EPA method
3550B.
For the EPA 8260B analysis, the samples were purged according to EPA method 5035. Three
surrogates recovered above the upper control limit in one sample. The high recovery may be
attributed to the matrix.
No unusual problem or complication was encountered with this sample set.
If you have any questions or require further information, please contact us at your convenience.
Thank you for choosing APPL, Inc.
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, both
technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. These test results meet
all requirements of NELAC. Release of the hard copy has been authorized by the Laboratory
Manager or her designee, as verified by the following signature.
Paula McCartney, Laboratory Director

APPL, Inc.
PM/lac
Enclosure
cc: File
Page 1 of 55 91457 Schmierer.doc

TPH Diesel Soil EPA 8015B
2882 Prospect Park Dr. STE 200 908 North Temperance Avenue

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Sample ID: 1L-MW-1-31 APPL ID: BA07237
Sample Collection Date: 02/18/20 QCG: #TPHDS-200221A-250213
Extraction Analysis
EPA 8015B-e DIESEL FUEL Not detected 1000 500.0 ug/kg 02/21/20 02/24/20
EPA 8015B-e MOTOR OIL Not detected 10000 3510.0 ug/kg 02/21/20 02/24/20
EPA 8015B-e SURROGATE: ORTHO-TERPHENYL ( 105 58-128 % 02/21/20 02/24/20

Run #: 214124
Instrument: Apollo
Sequence: 200214
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: SSE
Printed: 02/25/20 3:59:27 PM
Page 2 of 55

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 214125
Instrument: Apollo
Sequence: 200214
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: SSE
Printed: 02/25/20 3:59:27 PM
Page 3 of 55

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Sample ID: SB-1-27 APPL ID: BA07239
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 214126
Instrument: Apollo
Sequence: 200214
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: SSE
Printed: 02/25/20 3:59:27 PM
Page 4 of 55

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 214127
Instrument: Apollo
Sequence: 200214
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: SSE
Printed: 02/25/20 3:59:27 PM
Page 5 of 55

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis
EPA 8015B-e DIESEL FUEL 2600000 ++ 10000 5000.0 ug/kg 02/21/20 02/25/20
EPA 8015B-e SURROGATE: ORTHO-TERPHENYL ( 90.9 58-128 % 02/21/20 02/25/20
++(T2M) The analyst has noted that the chromatogram of this sample is mainly lower Quant Method: TPHD0214.M
boiling hydrocarbons. Run #: 214148
Instrument: Apollo
Sequence: 200214
Dilution Factor: 10
Initials: SSE
Printed: 02/25/20 3:59:27 PM
Page 6 of 55

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis
EPA 8015B-e DIESEL FUEL 280000 ++ 1000 500.0 ug/kg 02/21/20 02/24/20
++(T2M) The analyst has noted that the chromatogram of this sample is mainly lower Quant Method: TPHD0214.M
boiling hydrocarbons. Run #: 214129
Instrument: Apollo
Sequence: 200214
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: SSE
Printed: 02/25/20 3:59:27 PM
Page 7 of 55

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 214130
Instrument: Apollo
Sequence: 200214
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: SSE
Printed: 02/25/20 3:59:27 PM
Page 8 of 55

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 214131
Instrument: Apollo
Sequence: 200214
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: SSE
Printed: 02/25/20 3:59:27 PM
Page 9 of 55

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 214132
Instrument: Apollo
Sequence: 200214
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: SSE
Printed: 02/25/20 3:59:27 PM
Page 10 of 55
EPA 8260B MEOH SOIL -GRO

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Sample Collection Date: 02/18/20 QCG: #GRO86-200221BT-250184
Extraction Analysis
EPA 8260B-M GASOLINE Not detected 1.0 0.50 mg/Kg 02/22/20 02/22/20
EPA 8260B-M SURROGATE: 4-BROMOFLUOROBEN 93.2 79-119 % 02/22/20 02/22/20
Quant Method: TGAS0219.M

Run #: 0221T33
Instrument: Thor
Sequence: T200219B
Dilution Factor: 50
Initials: DPO
Printed: 02/26/20 11:52:01 AM
Page 11 of 55

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 0221T34
Instrument: Thor
Sequence: T200219B
Dilution Factor: 50
Initials: DPO
Printed: 02/26/20 11:52:01 AM
Page 12 of 55

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 0221T35
Instrument: Thor
Sequence: T200219B
Dilution Factor: 50
Initials: DPO
Printed: 02/26/20 11:52:01 AM
Page 13 of 55

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 0221T36
Instrument: Thor
Sequence: T200219B
Dilution Factor: 50
Initials: DPO
Printed: 02/26/20 11:52:01 AM
Page 14 of 55

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis
EPA 8260B-M GASOLINE 6900 ++ 100.0 5.00 mg/Kg 02/25/20 02/25/20

EPA 8260B-M SURROGATE: 4-BROMOFLUOROBEN 101 79-119 % 02/25/20 02/25/20
Instrument: Thor
Sequence: T200224
Initials: DPO
Printed: 02/26/20 11:52:01 AM
Page 15 of 55

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis
EPA 8260B-M GASOLINE 2800 ++ 10.0 5.00 mg/Kg 02/25/20 02/25/20

Instrument: Thor
Sequence: T200224
Initials: DPO
Printed: 02/26/20 11:52:01 AM
Page 16 of 55

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 0221T37
Instrument: Thor
Sequence: T200219B
Dilution Factor: 50
Initials: DPO
Printed: 02/26/20 11:52:01 AM
Page 17 of 55

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 0221T38
Instrument: Thor
Sequence: T200219B
Dilution Factor: 50
Initials: DPO
Printed: 02/26/20 11:52:01 AM
Page 18 of 55

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 0221T39
Instrument: Thor
Sequence: T200219B
Dilution Factor: 50
Initials: DPO
Printed: 02/26/20 11:52:01 AM
Page 19 of 55
EPA 8260B SOIL

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Sample Collection Date: 02/18/20 QCG: #8260S-200221AL-250311
Extraction Analysis
EPA 8260B 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE Not detected 5.0 0.99 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE Not detected 5.0 0.81 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE Not detected 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE Not detected 5.0 0.79 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B 1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE Not detected 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE Not detected 5.0 0.95 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE Not detected 5.0 0.72 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B 4-ETHYLTOLUENE Not detected 5.0 2.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B BENZENE Not detected 5.0 0.63 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B BROMOBENZENE Not detected 5.0 0.76 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B BROMODICHLOROMETHANE Not detected 5.0 0.69 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B BROMOFORM Not detected 5.0 0.80 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B BROMOMETHANE Not detected 10.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B CARBON TETRACHLORIDE Not detected 5.0 0.80 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B CHLOROBENZENE Not detected 5.0 0.49 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B CHLOROETHANE Not detected 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B CHLOROFORM Not detected 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B CHLOROMETHANE Not detected 5.0 1.82 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE Not detected 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE Not detected 5.0 0.93 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE Not detected 5.0 0.85 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B DIBROMOMETHANE Not detected 5.0 0.87 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE Not detected 10.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B ETHYLBENZENE Not detected 5.0 1.01 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B FREON 113 Not detected 10.0 0.83 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B METHYLENE CHLORIDE Not detected 50.0 4.58 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B MTBE Not detected 5.0 0.89 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B N-PROPYLBENZENE Not detected 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B TETRACHLOROETHENE Not detected 5.0 0.54 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
Quant Method: L0221S.M

Run #: 0221L17
Instrument: Loki
Sequence: 200221
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:33:43 PM
Page 20 of 55
EPA 8260B SOIL

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis
EPA 8260B TOLUENE Not detected 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE Not detected 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE Not detected 5.0 0.93 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B TRICHLOROETHENE Not detected 5.0 0.98 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE Not detected 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B VINYL CHLORIDE Not detected 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B XYLENES Not detected 5.0 2.35 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20

Run #: 0221L17
Instrument: Loki
Sequence: 200221
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:33:43 PM
Page 21 of 55
EPA 8260B SOIL

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 0221L18
Instrument: Loki
Sequence: 200221
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:33:43 PM
Page 22 of 55
EPA 8260B SOIL

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 0221L18
Instrument: Loki
Sequence: 200221
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:33:43 PM
Page 23 of 55
EPA 8260B SOIL

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 0221L19
Instrument: Loki
Sequence: 200221
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:33:43 PM
Page 24 of 55
EPA 8260B SOIL

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 0221L19
Instrument: Loki
Sequence: 200221
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:33:43 PM
Page 25 of 55
EPA 8260B SOIL

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 0221L20
Instrument: Loki
Sequence: 200221
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:33:43 PM
Page 26 of 55
EPA 8260B SOIL

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 0221L20
Instrument: Loki
Sequence: 200221
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:33:43 PM
Page 27 of 55
EPA 8260B SOIL

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis
EPA 8260B 1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 2800 E 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B 4-ETHYLTOLUENE 2600 E 5.0 2.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B ETHYLBENZENE 43 5.0 1.01 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B N-PROPYLBENZENE 1200 E 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
E = The reported value exceeds linear range. Quant Method: L0221S.M

Run #: 0221L21
Instrument: Loki
Sequence: 200221
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:33:43 PM
Page 28 of 55
EPA 8260B SOIL

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis
EPA 8260B XYLENES 480 E 5.0 2.35 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B SURROGATE: 4-BROMOFLUOROBEN 112 82-121 % 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B SURROGATE: TOLUENE-D8 (S) 104 71-127 % 02/21/20 02/21/20
E = The reported value exceeds linear range. Quant Method: L0221S.M

Run #: 0221L21
Instrument: Loki
Sequence: 200221
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:33:43 PM
Page 29 of 55
EPA 8260B MEOH

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Sample Collection Date: 02/18/20 QCG: #8260S-200226AT-250322
Extraction Analysis
EPA 8260B-M 1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 200000 250.0 75.00 ug/Kg 02/27/20 02/27/20

EPA 8260B-M 4-ETHYLTOLUENE 79000 250.0 100.00 ug/Kg 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B-M N-PROPYLBENZENE 13000 250.0 105.00 ug/Kg 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B-M XYLENES 3400 250.0 95.00 ug/Kg 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B-M SURROGATE: 1,2-DICHLOROETHAN 106 70-125 % 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B-M SURROGATE: DIBROMOFLUOROME 106 78-125 % 02/27/20 02/27/20
EPA 8260B-M SURROGATE: TOLUENE-D8 (S) 102 73-124 % 02/27/20 02/27/20

Run #: 0226T45
Instrument: Thor
Sequence: T200226
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:37:42 PM
Page 30 of 55
EPA 8260B SOIL

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis
EPA 8260B 4-ETHYLTOLUENE 430 E 5.0 2.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B ETHYLBENZENE 81 5.0 1.01 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B N-PROPYLBENZENE 590 E 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
J = Estimated value. Quant Method: L0221S.M

E = The reported value exceeds linear range. Run #: 0221L22
# = Recovery (or RPD) is outside QC limits. Instrument: Loki
Sequence: 200221
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:33:43 PM
Page 31 of 55
EPA 8260B SOIL

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis
EPA 8260B TOLUENE 1.2 J 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B XYLENES 1500 E 5.0 2.35 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B SURROGATE: 1,2-DICHLOROETHAN 138 # 59-120 % 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B SURROGATE: DIBROMOFLUOROME 140 # 74-122 % 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B SURROGATE: TOLUENE-D8 (S) 195 # 71-127 % 02/21/20 02/21/20

E = The reported value exceeds linear range. Run #: 0221L22
# = Recovery (or RPD) is outside QC limits. Instrument: Loki
Sequence: 200221
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:33:43 PM
Page 32 of 55
EPA 8260B MEOH

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Sample Collection Date: 02/18/20 QCG: #8260S-200221BT-250321
Extraction Analysis

EPA 8260B-M 4-ETHYLTOLUENE 14000 25.0 10.00 ug/Kg 02/22/20 02/22/20
EPA 8260B-M N-PROPYLBENZENE 1800 25.0 10.50 ug/Kg 02/22/20 02/22/20
EPA 8260B-M XYLENES 600 25.0 9.50 ug/Kg 02/22/20 02/22/20
EPA 8260B-M SURROGATE: 1,2-DICHLOROETHAN 101 70-125 % 02/22/20 02/22/20
EPA 8260B-M SURROGATE: DIBROMOFLUOROME 100.0 78-125 % 02/22/20 02/22/20
EPA 8260B-M SURROGATE: TOLUENE-D8 (S) 95.0 73-124 % 02/22/20 02/22/20

Run #: 0221T40
Instrument: Thor
Sequence: T200219B
Dilution Factor: 50
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:37:42 PM
Page 33 of 55
EPA 8260B SOIL

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 0221L23
Instrument: Loki
Sequence: 200221
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:33:43 PM
Page 34 of 55
EPA 8260B SOIL

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 0221L23
Instrument: Loki
Sequence: 200221
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:33:43 PM
Page 35 of 55
EPA 8260B SOIL

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 0221L24
Instrument: Loki
Sequence: 200221
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:33:43 PM
Page 36 of 55
EPA 8260B SOIL

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 0221L24
Instrument: Loki
Sequence: 200221
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:33:43 PM
Page 37 of 55
EPA 8260B SOIL

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis
EPA 8260B 1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 10 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B 1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 3.2 J 5.0 0.97 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
EPA 8260B 4-ETHYLTOLUENE 3.2 J 5.0 2.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20

Run #: 0221L25
Instrument: Loki
Sequence: 200221
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:33:43 PM
Page 38 of 55
EPA 8260B SOIL

Project: 20203368 ARF: 91457
Extraction Analysis

Run #: 0221L25
Instrument: Loki
Sequence: 200221
Dilution Factor: 1
Initials: DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:33:43 PM
Page 39 of 55
Method Blank
APPL Inc.
Blank Name/QCG: 200221S-07237 - 250213 908 North Temperance Avenu
Batch ID: #TPHDS-200221A Clovis, CA 93611
BLANK DIESEL FUEL Not detected 1000 500.0 ug/kg 02/21/20 02/24/20
BLANK MOTOR OIL Not detected 10000 3510.0 ug/kg 02/21/20 02/24/20
BLANK SURROGATE: OCTACOSANE (S) 89.1 47-140 % 02/21/20 02/24/20
BLANK SURROGATE: ORTHO-TERPHENYL ( 97.4 58-128 % 02/21/20 02/24/20
Quant Method:TPHD0214.M
Run #:214121
Instrument: Apollo
Sequence: 200214
Initials: SSE
Printed: 02/25/20 3:59:27 PM
Page 40 of 55
APPL ID: 200221S-07237 LCS - 250213 APPL Inc.

Batch ID: #TPHDS-200221A 908 North Temperance Avenue
Clovis, CA 93611

ug/kg ug/kg Recovery Limits
DIESEL FUEL 200000 181000 90.5 64-122
MOTOR OIL 200000 165000 82.5 50-150
SURROGATE: OCTACOSANE (S) 15000 14000 93.3 47-140

SURROGATE: ORTHO-TERPHENYL (S) 15000 14600 97.3 58-128
Primary SPK
Quant Method : TPHD0214.M
Comments:
Instrument : Apollo
Run : 214122
Initials : SSE
Printed: 02/25/20 3:59:27 PM

APPL Standard LCS
Page 41 of 55
Method Blank
APPL Inc.
Batch ID: #GRO86-200221BT Clovis, CA 93611
BLANK GASOLINE Not detected 1.0 0.30 mg/Kg 02/22/20 02/22/20

Run #:0221T32
Instrument:Thor
Sequence: T200219B
Initials:DPO
Printed: 02/26/20 11:52:26 AM
Page 42 of 55
Method Blank
APPL Inc.
BLANK GASOLINE Not detected 1.0 0.30 mg/Kg 02/25/20 02/25/20

Run #:0224T67
Instrument:Thor
Sequence: T200224
Initials:DPO
Printed: 02/26/20 11:52:26 AM
Page 43 of 55

Batch ID: #GRO86-200221BT 908 North Temperance Avenue
Clovis, CA 93611

mg/Kg mg/Kg Recovery Limits
GASOLINE 15.0 14.6 97.3 79-122
Primary SPK

Instrument : Thor
Run : 0221T30
Initials : DPO
Printed: 02/26/20 11:51:31 AM

APPL Standard LCS
Page 44 of 55

Clovis, CA 93611

mg/Kg mg/Kg Recovery Limits
GASOLINE 15.0 15.0 100 79-122
Primary SPK

Instrument : Thor
Run : 0224T47
Initials : DPO
Printed: 02/26/20 11:51:31 AM

APPL Standard LCS
Page 45 of 55
Method Blank
EPA 8260B SOIL
APPL Inc.
Batch ID: #8260S-200221AL Clovis, CA 93611
BLANK 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE Not detected 5.0 0.99 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20

BLANK 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE Not detected 5.0 0.81 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE Not detected 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE Not detected 5.0 0.96 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE Not detected 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE Not detected 5.0 0.79 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK 1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE Not detected 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE Not detected 5.0 0.95 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE Not detected 5.0 0.77 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE Not detected 5.0 0.72 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK 4-ETHYLTOLUENE Not detected 5.0 2.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK BENZENE Not detected 5.0 0.63 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK BROMOBENZENE Not detected 5.0 0.76 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK BROMODICHLOROMETHANE Not detected 5.0 0.69 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK BROMOFORM Not detected 5.0 0.80 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK BROMOMETHANE Not detected 10.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK CARBON TETRACHLORIDE Not detected 5.0 0.80 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK CHLOROBENZENE Not detected 5.0 0.49 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK CHLOROETHANE Not detected 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK CHLOROFORM Not detected 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK CHLOROMETHANE Not detected 5.0 1.82 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE Not detected 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE Not detected 5.0 0.93 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE Not detected 5.0 0.85 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK DIBROMOMETHANE Not detected 5.0 0.87 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE Not detected 10.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK ETHYLBENZENE Not detected 5.0 1.01 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK FREON 113 Not detected 10.0 0.83 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK METHYLENE CHLORIDE Not detected 50.0 4.58 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK MTBE Not detected 5.0 0.89 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK N-PROPYLBENZENE Not detected 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
Quant Method:L0221S.M
Run #:0221L16
Instrument:Loki
Sequence: 200221
Initials:DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:34:06 PM
Page 46 of 55
Method Blank
EPA 8260B SOIL
APPL Inc.
Batch ID: #8260S-200221AL Clovis, CA 93611
BLANK TETRACHLOROETHENE Not detected 5.0 0.54 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20

BLANK TOLUENE Not detected 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE Not detected 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE Not detected 5.0 0.93 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK TRICHLOROETHENE Not detected 5.0 0.98 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE Not detected 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK VINYL CHLORIDE Not detected 5.0 1.00 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK XYLENES Not detected 5.0 2.35 ug/Kg 02/21/20 02/21/20
BLANK SURROGATE: 1,2-DICHLOROETHAN 98.4 59-120 % 02/21/20 02/21/20
Quant Method:L0221S.M
Run #:0221L16
Instrument:Loki
Sequence: 200221
Initials:DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:34:06 PM
Page 47 of 55
Method Blank
EPA 8260B MEOH
APPL Inc.
Batch ID: #8260S-200221BT Clovis, CA 93611

BLANK SURROGATE: DIBROMOFLUOROMET 99.1 78-125 % 02/22/20 02/22/20
BLANK SURROGATE: TOLUENE-D8 (S) 94.8 73-124 % 02/22/20 02/22/20
Run #:0221T32
Instrument:Thor
Sequence: T200219B
Initials:DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:37:56 PM
Page 48 of 55
Method Blank
EPA 8260B MEOH
APPL Inc.
Batch ID: #8260S-200226AT Clovis, CA 93611

BLANK SURROGATE: DIBROMOFLUOROMET 99.8 78-125 % 02/26/20 02/26/20
BLANK SURROGATE: TOLUENE-D8 (S) 97.1 73-124 % 02/26/20 02/26/20
Run #:0226T29
Instrument:Thor
Sequence: T200226
Initials:DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:37:56 PM
Page 49 of 55
EPA 8260B SOIL

Batch ID: #8260S-200221AL 908 North Temperance Avenue
Clovis, CA 93611

ug/Kg ug/Kg Recovery Limits
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 50.0 42.6 85.2 65-135
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 50.0 45.1 90.2 65-135
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 50.0 43.6 87.2 62-135
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 50.0 43.9 87.8 65-135
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 50.0 45.1 90.2 75-125
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 50.0 44.9 89.8 60-145
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 50.0 46.6 93.2 65-125
4-ETHYLTOLUENE 50.0 44.0 88.0 75-125
BENZENE 50.0 43.2 86.4 65-135
BROMOBENZENE 50.0 41.0 82.0 55-130
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 50.0 44.6 89.2 60-135
BROMOFORM 50.0 44.7 89.4 45-150
BROMOMETHANE 50.0 43.1 86.2 10-180
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 50.0 42.6 85.2 55-145
CHLOROBENZENE 50.0 42.1 84.2 65-130
CHLOROETHANE 50.0 42.4 84.8 20-175
CHLOROFORM 50.0 43.8 87.6 65-135
CHLOROMETHANE 50.0 43.1 86.2 40-140
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 50.0 43.3 86.6 55-135
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 50.0 45.9 91.8 65-135
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 50.0 43.9 87.8 63-135
DIBROMOMETHANE 50.0 43.2 86.4 65-135
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE 50.0 49.5 99.0 15-155
ETHYLBENZENE 50.0 45.2 90.4 78-127
FREON 113 50.0 47.5 95.0 71-135
Primary SPK
Quant Method : L0221S.M

Instrument : Loki
Run : 0221L14
Initials : DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:33:25 PM

APPL Standard LCS
Page 50 of 55
EPA 8260B SOIL

Batch ID: #8260S-200221AL 908 North Temperance Avenue
Clovis, CA 93611

METHYLENE CHLORIDE 50.0 46.0 92.0 40-155
MTBE 50.0 48.0 96.0 65-135
N-PROPYLBENZENE 50.0 42.5 85.0 75-125
TETRACHLOROETHENE 50.0 40.2 80.4 55-150
TOLUENE 50.0 45.6 91.2 60-135
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 50.0 42.2 84.4 55-145
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 50.0 47.8 95.6 55-140
TRICHLOROETHENE 50.0 42.9 85.8 70-130
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 50.0 44.7 89.4 10-215
VINYL CHLORIDE 50.0 44.4 88.8 45-140
XYLENES 150 137 91.3 70-135

Primary SPK
Quant Method : L0221S.M

Instrument : Loki
Run : 0221L14
Initials : DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:33:25 PM

APPL Standard LCS
Page 51 of 55
EPA 8260B MEOH

Batch ID: #8260S-200226AT 908 North Temperance Avenue
Clovis, CA 93611

1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 500 531 106 75-125
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 500 552 110 75-125
4-ETHYLTOLUENE 500 459 91.8 75-125
N-PROPYLBENZENE 500 535 107 75-125
XYLENES 1500 1590 106 73-145

Primary SPK

Instrument : Thor
Run : 0226T26
Initials : DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:37:28 PM

APPL Standard LCS
Page 52 of 55
EPA 8260B MEOH

Batch ID: #8260S-200221BT 908 North Temperance Avenue
Clovis, CA 93611

4-ETHYLTOLUENE 10.00 9.53 95.3 75-125
N-PROPYLBENZENE 10.00 9.33 93.3 75-125
XYLENES 30.0 28.9 96.3 73-145

SURROGATE: TOLUENE-D8 (S) 25.0 24.1 96.4 73-124
Primary SPK

Instrument : Thor
Run : 0221T26
Initials : DPO
Printed: 03/10/20 4:37:28 PM

APPL Standard LCS
Page 53 of 55
Page 54 of 55
Page 55 of 55
3/4/2020
Mr. Bill Schmierer
Kleinfelder
2882 Prospect Park Dr.
Suite 200
Rancho Cordova CA 95670
Project Name:
Project #: 20203368
Workorder #: 2002687A
Dear Mr. Bill Schmierer
The following report includes the data for the above referenced project for sample(s)
received on 2/26/2020 at Air Toxics Ltd.
The data and associated QC analyzed by TO-15 are compliant with the project
requirements or laboratory criteria with the exception of the deviations noted in the
attached case narrative.
Thank you for choosing Eurofins Air Toxics Inc. for your air analysis needs. Eurofins Air
Toxics Inc. is committed to providing accurate data of the highest quality. Please feel free
to contact the Project Manager: Kelly Buettner at 916-985-1000 if you have any
questions regarding the data in this report.
Regards,
Kelly Buettner
Project Manager
Page 1 of 48
WORK ORDER #: 2002687A
Work Order Summary
CLIENT: Mr. Bill Schmierer BILL TO: Mr. Bill Schmierer

Kleinfelder Kleinfelder
2882 Prospect Park Dr. 2882 Prospect Park Dr.
Suite 200 Suite 200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
PHONE: 916-366-1701 P.O. #
FAX: PROJECT # 20203368
DATE RECEIVED: 02/26/2020 CONTACT: Kelly Buettner
DATE COMPLETED: 03/04/2020
RECEIPT FINAL
FRACTION # NAME TEST VAC./PRES. PRESSURE
01A VMP-3-3'-3'' TO-15 7.5 "Hg 15 psi
02A VMP-2-3-5' TO-15 7.5 "Hg 15 psi
03A VMP-2-14'8'' TO-15 6.5 "Hg 15 psi
04A VMP-4-14'11'' TO-15 6.0 "Hg 15 psi
05A VMP-4-4' TO-15 7.0 "Hg 15 psi
06A VMP-6-15' TO-15 4.0 "Hg 15 psi
07A VMP-6-3'6'' TO-15 6.0 "Hg 15 psi
08A VMP-5-4'9'' TO-15 6.5 "Hg 15 psi
09A VMP-1-15' TO-15 6.5 "Hg 15 psi
10A Lab Blank TO-15 NA NA
10B Lab Blank TO-15 NA NA
10C Lab Blank TO-15 NA NA
11A CCV TO-15 NA NA
11B CCV TO-15 NA NA
11C CCV TO-15 NA NA
12A LCS TO-15 NA NA
12AA LCSD TO-15 NA NA
12B LCS TO-15 NA NA
12BB LCSD TO-15 NA NA
12C LCS TO-15 NA NA
12CC LCSD TO-15 NA NA
CERTIFIED BY: DATE: 03/04/20
Technical Director
Certification numbers: AZ Licensure AZ0775, FL NELAP – E87680, LA NELAP – 02089, NH NELAP - 209218, NJ NELAP - CA016,
NY NELAP - 11291, TX NELAP - T104704434-18-13, UT NELAP – CA009332019-11, VA NELAP - 460197, WA NELAP - C935
Name of Accreditation Body: NELAP/ORELAP (Oregon Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program)
Accreditation number: CA300005-011, Effective date: 10/18/2019, Expiration date: 10/17/2020.
Eurofins Air Toxics, LLC certifies that the test results contained in this report meet all requirements of the NELAC standards
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Eurofins Air Toxics, LLC.
180 BLUE RAVINE ROAD, SUITE B FOLSOM, CA - 95630
(916) 985-1000 . (800) 985-5955 . FAX (916) 351-8279
Page 2 of 48
LABORATORY NARRATIVE
EPA Method TO-15
Kleinfelder
Workorder# 2002687A
The laboratory performed analysis via EPA Method TO-15 using GC/MS in the full scan mode.
Receiving Notes
There were no receiving discrepancies.
Analytical Notes
Dilution was performed on samples VMP-2-14'8'', VMP-4-14'11'', VMP-4-4' and VMP-1-15' due to
matrix interference.
Definition of Data Qualifying Flags

Ten qualifiers may have been used on the data analysis sheets and indicates as follows:
B - Compound present in laboratory blank greater than reporting limit (background subtraction not
performed).
J - Estimated value.
E - Exceeds instrument calibration range.
S - Saturated peak.
Q - Exceeds quality control limits.
U - Compound analyzed for but not detected above the reporting limit, LOD, or MDL value. See
data page for project specific U-flag definition.
UJ- Non-detected compound associated with low bias in the CCV
N - The identification is based on presumptive evidence.
M - Reported value may be biased due to apparent matrix interferences.
CN - See Case Narrative.
File extensions may have been used on the data analysis sheets and indicates
as follows:
a-File was requantified
b-File was quantified by a second column and detector
r1-File was requantified for the purpose of reissue
Page 3 of 48
Summary of Detected Compounds
EPA METHOD TO-15 GC/MS FULL SCAN
Client Sample ID: VMP-3-3'-3''

Lab ID#: 2002687A-01A
Rpt. Limit Amount Rpt. Limit Amount
Compound (ppbv) (ppbv) (ug/m3) (ug/m3)
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1.3 1.3 J 8.1 8.0 J
Client Sample ID: VMP-2-3-5'

Lab ID#: 2002687A-02A
Hexane 1.3 4.0 4.7 14
Cyclohexane 1.3 2.6 4.6 8.8
Toluene 1.3 1.4 5.1 5.1
Client Sample ID: VMP-2-14'8''

Lab ID#: 2002687A-03A
Hexane 22 81 76 280
Cyclohexane 22 24 74 84

Lab ID#: 2002687A-04A
m,p-Xylene 320 2400 1400 10000
Cumene 320 1100 1500 5600
Propylbenzene 320 3600 1500 18000
4-Ethyltoluene 320 15000 1500 75000
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 320 8300 1500 41000
Client Sample ID: VMP-4-4'

Lab ID#: 2002687A-05A
Page 4 of 48

Lab ID#: 2002687A-05A
Ethanol 13 16 25 31
Hexane 3.3 3.4 12 12
Toluene 3.3 6.7 12 25
m,p-Xylene 3.3 3.5 14 15
Cumene 3.3 4.1 16 20
Propylbenzene 3.3 9.4 16 46
4-Ethyltoluene 3.3 32 16 160
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 3.3 24 16 120

Lab ID#: 2002687A-06A
Ethanol 4.7 8.3 8.8 16
Carbon Disulfide 4.7 8.5 14 26
Hexane 1.2 5.8 4.1 20
Chloroform 1.2 1.6 5.7 7.6
Cyclohexane 1.2 3.4 4.0 12
Toluene 1.2 3.8 4.4 14
Tetrachloroethene 1.2 1.6 7.9 11
Ethyl Benzene 1.2 1.2 5.0 5.4
m,p-Xylene 1.2 1.5 5.0 6.6
o-Xylene 1.2 1.3 5.0 5.5
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1.2 5.8 7.0 35

Lab ID#: 2002687A-07A
Hexane 1.3 4.8 4.4 17
Heptane 1.3 1.4 5.2 5.6
Page 5 of 48

Lab ID#: 2002687A-07A
Toluene 1.3 8.3 4.7 31
m,p-Xylene 1.3 1.5 5.5 6.4

Lab ID#: 2002687A-08A
Toluene 1.3 1.6 4.9 6.1
Tetrachloroethene 1.3 13 8.8 91

Lab ID#: 2002687A-09A
Tetrachloroethene 5.2 17 35 120
Page 6 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-01A
File Name: p022720 Date of Collection: 2/24/20 1:05:00 PM

Dil. Factor: 2.69 Date of Analysis: 2/28/20 12:33 AM
Freon 12 1.3 Not Detected 6.6 Not Detected
Chloromethane 13 Not Detected 28 Not Detected
Vinyl Chloride 1.3 Not Detected 3.4 Not Detected
1,3-Butadiene 1.3 Not Detected 3.0 Not Detected
Bromomethane 13 Not Detected 52 Not Detected
Chloroethane 5.4 Not Detected 14 Not Detected
Ethanol 5.4 Not Detected 10 Not Detected
Freon 113 1.3 Not Detected 10 Not Detected
1,1-Dichloroethene 1.3 Not Detected 5.3 Not Detected
Acetone 13 Not Detected 32 Not Detected
2-Propanol 5.4 Not Detected 13 Not Detected
Carbon Disulfide 5.4 Not Detected 17 Not Detected
3-Chloropropene 5.4 Not Detected 17 Not Detected
Methylene Chloride 13 Not Detected 47 Not Detected
Methyl tert-butyl ether 5.4 Not Detected 19 Not Detected
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.3 Not Detected 5.3 Not Detected
Hexane 1.3 Not Detected 4.7 Not Detected
1,1-Dichloroethane 1.3 Not Detected 5.4 Not Detected
2-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone) 5.4 Not Detected 16 Not Detected
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.3 Not Detected 5.3 Not Detected
Tetrahydrofuran 1.3 Not Detected 4.0 Not Detected
Chloroform 1.3 Not Detected 6.6 Not Detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.3 Not Detected 7.3 Not Detected
Cyclohexane 1.3 Not Detected 4.6 Not Detected
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.3 Not Detected 8.5 Not Detected
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 1.3 Not Detected 6.3 Not Detected
Benzene 1.3 Not Detected 4.3 Not Detected
Heptane 1.3 Not Detected 5.5 Not Detected
Trichloroethene 1.3 Not Detected 7.2 Not Detected
1,2-Dichloropropane 1.3 Not Detected 6.2 Not Detected
1,4-Dioxane 5.4 Not Detected 19 Not Detected
Bromodichloromethane 1.3 Not Detected 9.0 Not Detected
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.3 Not Detected 6.1 Not Detected
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 1.3 Not Detected 5.5 Not Detected
Toluene 1.3 Not Detected 5.1 Not Detected
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.3 Not Detected 6.1 Not Detected
Tetrachloroethene 1.3 Not Detected 9.1 Not Detected
2-Hexanone 5.4 Not Detected 22 Not Detected
Page 7 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-01A
File Name: p022720 Date of Collection: 2/24/20 1:05:00 PM

Dibromochloromethane 1.3 Not Detected 11 Not Detected
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) 1.3 Not Detected 10 Not Detected
Chlorobenzene 1.3 Not Detected 6.2 Not Detected
Ethyl Benzene 1.3 Not Detected 5.8 Not Detected
m,p-Xylene 1.3 Not Detected 5.8 Not Detected
o-Xylene 1.3 Not Detected 5.8 Not Detected
Styrene 1.3 Not Detected 5.7 Not Detected
Bromoform 1.3 Not Detected 14 Not Detected
Cumene 1.3 Not Detected 6.6 Not Detected
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.3 Not Detected 9.2 Not Detected
Propylbenzene 1.3 Not Detected 6.6 Not Detected
4-Ethyltoluene 1.3 Not Detected 6.6 Not Detected
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.3 Not Detected 6.6 Not Detected
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1.3 1.3 J 8.1 8.0 J
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1.3 Not Detected 8.1 Not Detected
alpha-Chlorotoluene 1.3 Not Detected 7.0 Not Detected
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 5.4 Not Detected 40 Not Detected
Hexachlorobutadiene 5.4 Not Detected 57 Not Detected
J = Estimated value.
Container Type: 1 Liter Summa Canister
Method
Surrogates %Recovery Limits
Toluene-d8 101 70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 96 70-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene 100 70-130
Page 8 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-02A
File Name: p022721 Date of Collection: 2/25/20 8:41:00 AM

Ethanol 5.4 Not Detected 10 Not Detected
Hexane 1.3 4.0 4.7 14
Toluene 1.3 1.4 5.1 5.1
Page 9 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-02A


Method
Toluene-d8 100 70-130
Page 10 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-03A
EPA METHOD TO-15 GC/MS
File Name: 14030325 Date of Collection: 2/25/20 9:11:00 AM

Dil. Factor: 4.30 Date of Analysis: 3/3/20 09:59 PM
Freon 12 22 Not Detected 110 Not Detected
Vinyl Chloride 22 Not Detected 55 Not Detected
1,3-Butadiene 22 Not Detected 48 Not Detected
Chloroethane 86 Not Detected 230 Not Detected
Ethanol 86 Not Detected 160 Not Detected
1,1-Dichloroethene 22 Not Detected 85 Not Detected
2-Propanol 86 Not Detected 210 Not Detected
Carbon Disulfide 86 Not Detected 270 Not Detected
3-Chloropropene 86 Not Detected 270 Not Detected
Methyl tert-butyl ether 22 Not Detected 78 Not Detected
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 22 Not Detected 85 Not Detected
Hexane 22 81 76 280
1,1-Dichloroethane 22 Not Detected 87 Not Detected
2-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone) 86 Not Detected 250 Not Detected
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 22 Not Detected 85 Not Detected
Tetrahydrofuran 22 Not Detected 63 Not Detected
Chloroform 22 Not Detected 100 Not Detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 22 Not Detected 120 Not Detected
Cyclohexane 22 24 74 84
Carbon Tetrachloride 22 Not Detected 140 Not Detected
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 22 Not Detected 100 Not Detected
Benzene 22 Not Detected 69 Not Detected
Heptane 22 Not Detected 88 Not Detected
Trichloroethene 22 Not Detected 120 Not Detected
1,2-Dichloropropane 22 Not Detected 99 Not Detected
1,4-Dioxane 86 Not Detected 310 Not Detected
Bromodichloromethane 22 Not Detected 140 Not Detected
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 22 Not Detected 98 Not Detected
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 22 Not Detected 88 Not Detected
Toluene 22 Not Detected 81 Not Detected
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 22 Not Detected 98 Not Detected
Tetrachloroethene 22 Not Detected 140 Not Detected
2-Hexanone 86 Not Detected 350 Not Detected
Page 11 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-03A

Dibromochloromethane 22 Not Detected 180 Not Detected
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) 22 Not Detected 160 Not Detected
Chlorobenzene 22 Not Detected 99 Not Detected
Ethyl Benzene 22 Not Detected 93 Not Detected
m,p-Xylene 22 Not Detected 93 Not Detected
o-Xylene 22 Not Detected 93 Not Detected
Styrene 22 Not Detected 92 Not Detected
Bromoform 22 Not Detected 220 Not Detected
Cumene 22 Not Detected 100 Not Detected
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 22 Not Detected 150 Not Detected
Propylbenzene 22 Not Detected 100 Not Detected
4-Ethyltoluene 22 Not Detected 100 Not Detected
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 22 Not Detected 100 Not Detected
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 22 Not Detected 100 Not Detected
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 22 Not Detected 130 Not Detected
alpha-Chlorotoluene 22 Not Detected 110 Not Detected
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 86 Not Detected 640 Not Detected
Hexachlorobutadiene 86 Not Detected 920 Not Detected

Method
Toluene-d8 99 70-130
Page 12 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-04A

Vinyl Chloride 320 Not Detected 800 Not Detected
1,3-Butadiene 320 Not Detected 700 Not Detected
1,1-Dichloroethene 320 Not Detected 1200 Not Detected
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 320 Not Detected 1200 Not Detected
Hexane 320 Not Detected 1100 Not Detected
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 320 Not Detected 1200 Not Detected
Tetrahydrofuran 320 Not Detected 930 Not Detected
Chloroform 320 Not Detected 1500 Not Detected
Cyclohexane 320 Not Detected 1100 Not Detected
Carbon Tetrachloride 320 Not Detected 2000 Not Detected
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 320 Not Detected 1500 Not Detected
Benzene 320 Not Detected 1000 Not Detected
Heptane 320 Not Detected 1300 Not Detected
Trichloroethene 320 Not Detected 1700 Not Detected
1,2-Dichloropropane 320 Not Detected 1400 Not Detected
Bromodichloromethane 320 Not Detected 2100 Not Detected
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 320 Not Detected 1400 Not Detected
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 320 Not Detected 1300 Not Detected
Toluene 320 Not Detected 1200 Not Detected
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 320 Not Detected 1400 Not Detected
Tetrachloroethene 320 Not Detected 2100 Not Detected
Page 13 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-04A

Dibromochloromethane 320 Not Detected 2700 Not Detected
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) 320 Not Detected 2400 Not Detected
Chlorobenzene 320 Not Detected 1400 Not Detected
Ethyl Benzene 320 Not Detected 1400 Not Detected
m,p-Xylene 320 2400 1400 10000
o-Xylene 320 Not Detected 1400 Not Detected
Styrene 320 Not Detected 1300 Not Detected
Bromoform 320 Not Detected 3200 Not Detected
Cumene 320 1100 1500 5600
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 320 Not Detected 2200 Not Detected
Propylbenzene 320 3600 1500 18000
4-Ethyltoluene 320 15000 1500 75000
alpha-Chlorotoluene 320 Not Detected 1600 Not Detected

Method
Page 14 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-05A

Ethanol 13 16 25 31
1,1-Dichloroethene 3.3 Not Detected 13 Not Detected
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.3 Not Detected 13 Not Detected
Hexane 3.3 3.4 12 12
1,1-Dichloroethane 3.3 Not Detected 13 Not Detected
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.3 Not Detected 13 Not Detected
Chloroform 3.3 Not Detected 16 Not Detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.3 Not Detected 18 Not Detected
Cyclohexane 3.3 Not Detected 11 Not Detected
Carbon Tetrachloride 3.3 Not Detected 21 Not Detected
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 3.3 Not Detected 15 Not Detected
Benzene 3.3 Not Detected 10 Not Detected
Heptane 3.3 Not Detected 14 Not Detected
Trichloroethene 3.3 Not Detected 18 Not Detected
1,2-Dichloropropane 3.3 Not Detected 15 Not Detected
Bromodichloromethane 3.3 Not Detected 22 Not Detected
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.3 Not Detected 15 Not Detected
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 3.3 Not Detected 13 Not Detected
Toluene 3.3 6.7 12 25
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.3 Not Detected 15 Not Detected
Tetrachloroethene 3.3 Not Detected 22 Not Detected
Page 15 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-05A

Chlorobenzene 3.3 Not Detected 15 Not Detected
Ethyl Benzene 3.3 Not Detected 14 Not Detected
m,p-Xylene 3.3 3.5 14 15
o-Xylene 3.3 Not Detected 14 Not Detected
Styrene 3.3 Not Detected 14 Not Detected
Cumene 3.3 4.1 16 20
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.3 Not Detected 23 Not Detected
Propylbenzene 3.3 9.4 16 46
4-Ethyltoluene 3.3 32 16 160
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 3.3 Not Detected 20 Not Detected
alpha-Chlorotoluene 3.3 Not Detected 17 Not Detected

Method
Toluene-d8 100 70-130
Page 16 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-06A

Ethanol 4.7 8.3 8.8 16
Carbon Disulfide 4.7 8.5 14 26
Hexane 1.2 5.8 4.1 20
Chloroform 1.2 1.6 5.7 7.6
Cyclohexane 1.2 3.4 4.0 12
Toluene 1.2 3.8 4.4 14
Tetrachloroethene 1.2 1.6 7.9 11
Page 17 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-06A

Dibromochloromethane 1.2 Not Detected 9.9 Not Detected
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) 1.2 Not Detected 9.0 Not Detected
Ethyl Benzene 1.2 1.2 5.0 5.4
m,p-Xylene 1.2 1.5 5.0 6.6
o-Xylene 1.2 1.3 5.0 5.5

Method
Toluene-d8 102 70-130
Page 18 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-07A

Ethanol 5.0 Not Detected 9.5 Not Detected
Hexane 1.3 4.8 4.4 17
Heptane 1.3 1.4 5.2 5.6
Toluene 1.3 8.3 4.7 31
Page 19 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-07A

m,p-Xylene 1.3 1.5 5.5 6.4

Method
Toluene-d8 100 70-130
Page 20 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-08A

Toluene 1.3 1.6 4.9 6.1
Tetrachloroethene 1.3 13 8.8 91
Page 21 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-08A


Method
Toluene-d8 100 70-130
Page 22 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-09A
File Name: 17030316 Date of Collection: 2/25/20 12:38:00 PM

Vinyl Chloride 5.2 Not Detected 13 Not Detected
1,3-Butadiene 5.2 Not Detected 11 Not Detected
Hexane 5.2 Not Detected 18 Not Detected
Tetrahydrofuran 5.2 Not Detected 15 Not Detected
Toluene 5.2 Not Detected 19 Not Detected
Tetrachloroethene 5.2 17 35 120
Page 23 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-09A
File Name: 17030316 Date of Collection: 2/25/20 12:38:00 PM

m,p-Xylene 5.2 Not Detected 22 Not Detected
Cumene 5.2 Not Detected 25 Not Detected
Propylbenzene 5.2 Not Detected 25 Not Detected
4-Ethyltoluene 5.2 Not Detected 25 Not Detected
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 5.2 Not Detected 25 Not Detected

Method
Toluene-d8 102 70-130
Page 24 of 48
Client Sample ID: Lab Blank
Lab ID#: 2002687A-10A
File Name: p022705 Date of Collection: NA

Chloromethane 5.0 Not Detected 10 Not Detected
Bromomethane 5.0 Not Detected 19 Not Detected
Chloroethane 2.0 Not Detected 5.3 Not Detected
Acetone 5.0 Not Detected 12 Not Detected
2-Propanol 2.0 Not Detected 4.9 Not Detected
Carbon Disulfide 2.0 Not Detected 6.2 Not Detected
3-Chloropropene 2.0 Not Detected 6.3 Not Detected
Methylene Chloride 5.0 Not Detected 17 Not Detected
Methyl tert-butyl ether 2.0 Not Detected 7.2 Not Detected
2-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone) 2.0 Not Detected 5.9 Not Detected
1,4-Dioxane 2.0 Not Detected 7.2 Not Detected
2-Hexanone 2.0 Not Detected 8.2 Not Detected
Page 25 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-10A

Bromoform 0.50 Not Detected 5.2 Not Detected
Container Type: NA - Not Applicable

Method
Toluene-d8 101 70-130
Page 26 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-10B
File Name: 14030312 Date of Collection: NA

Vinyl Chloride 5.0 Not Detected 13 Not Detected
1,3-Butadiene 5.0 Not Detected 11 Not Detected
Hexane 5.0 Not Detected 18 Not Detected
Tetrahydrofuran 5.0 Not Detected 15 Not Detected
Toluene 5.0 Not Detected 19 Not Detected
Tetrachloroethene 5.0 Not Detected 34 Not Detected
Page 27 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-10B

m,p-Xylene 5.0 Not Detected 22 Not Detected
Cumene 5.0 Not Detected 24 Not Detected
Propylbenzene 5.0 Not Detected 24 Not Detected
4-Ethyltoluene 5.0 Not Detected 24 Not Detected

Method
Page 28 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-10C

Chloromethane 5.0 Not Detected 10 Not Detected
Bromomethane 5.0 Not Detected 19 Not Detected
Chloroethane 2.0 Not Detected 5.3 Not Detected
Acetone 5.0 Not Detected 12 Not Detected
2-Propanol 2.0 Not Detected 4.9 Not Detected
Carbon Disulfide 2.0 Not Detected 6.2 Not Detected
3-Chloropropene 2.0 Not Detected 6.3 Not Detected
Methylene Chloride 5.0 Not Detected 17 Not Detected
Methyl tert-butyl ether 2.0 Not Detected 7.2 Not Detected
2-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone) 2.0 Not Detected 5.9 Not Detected
1,4-Dioxane 2.0 Not Detected 7.2 Not Detected
2-Hexanone 2.0 Not Detected 8.2 Not Detected
Page 29 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-10C

Bromoform 0.50 Not Detected 5.2 Not Detected

Method
Toluene-d8 100 70-130
Page 30 of 48
Client Sample ID: CCV
Lab ID#: 2002687A-11A

Compound %Recovery
Freon 12 97
Freon 114 99
Chloromethane 94
Vinyl Chloride 91
1,3-Butadiene 97
Bromomethane 94
Chloroethane 86
Freon 11 96
Ethanol 79
Freon 113 94
1,1-Dichloroethene 91
Acetone 85
2-Propanol 86
Carbon Disulfide 87
3-Chloropropene 93
Methylene Chloride 88
Methyl tert-butyl ether 91
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 95
Hexane 93
1,1-Dichloroethane 97
2-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone) 92
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 99
Tetrahydrofuran 89
Chloroform 98
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 97
Cyclohexane 92
Carbon Tetrachloride 107
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 94
Benzene 95
Heptane 96
Trichloroethene 98
1,2-Dichloropropane 94
1,4-Dioxane 92
Bromodichloromethane 101
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 101
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 95
Toluene 96
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 100
Tetrachloroethene 102
2-Hexanone 94
Page 31 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-11A

Compound %Recovery
Dibromochloromethane 103
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) 100
Chlorobenzene 100
Ethyl Benzene 100
m,p-Xylene 100
o-Xylene 100
Styrene 102
Bromoform 104
Cumene 100
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 98
Propylbenzene 98
4-Ethyltoluene 100
alpha-Chlorotoluene 98
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 100
Hexachlorobutadiene 102

Method
Toluene-d8 101 70-130
Page 32 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-11B

Compound %Recovery
Freon 12 88
Freon 114 98
Chloromethane 101
Vinyl Chloride 91
1,3-Butadiene 101
Bromomethane 97
Chloroethane 86
Freon 11 100
Ethanol 100
Freon 113 100
Acetone 102
2-Propanol 92
Carbon Disulfide 90
3-Chloropropene 85
Hexane 95
Tetrahydrofuran 84
Chloroform 90
Cyclohexane 92
Benzene 92
Heptane 84
Trichloroethene 90
1,4-Dioxane 86
Toluene 90
2-Hexanone 83
Page 33 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-11B

Compound %Recovery
Chlorobenzene 88
Ethyl Benzene 87
m,p-Xylene 89
o-Xylene 88
Styrene 90
Bromoform 85
Cumene 88
Propylbenzene 85
4-Ethyltoluene 87

Method
Page 34 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-11C

Compound %Recovery
Freon 12 106
Freon 114 101
Chloromethane 100
Vinyl Chloride 102
1,3-Butadiene 109
Bromomethane 102
Chloroethane 106
Freon 11 105
Ethanol 103
Freon 113 97
Acetone 102
2-Propanol 105
Carbon Disulfide 100
3-Chloropropene 99
Hexane 111
Tetrahydrofuran 106
Chloroform 101
Cyclohexane 103
Benzene 100
Heptane 112
Trichloroethene 100
1,4-Dioxane 100
Toluene 102
2-Hexanone 107
Page 35 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-11C

Compound %Recovery
Chlorobenzene 100
Ethyl Benzene 106
m,p-Xylene 106
o-Xylene 107
Styrene 109
Bromoform 98
Cumene 110
Propylbenzene 107
4-Ethyltoluene 112

Method
Page 36 of 48
Client Sample ID: LCS
Lab ID#: 2002687A-12A

Method
Compound %Recovery Limits
Freon 12 96 70-130
Freon 114 97 70-130
Chloromethane 80 70-130
Vinyl Chloride 89 70-130
1,3-Butadiene 96 70-130
Bromomethane 93 70-130
Chloroethane 86 70-130
Freon 11 96 70-130
Ethanol 70 70-130
Freon 113 93 70-130
1,1-Dichloroethene 94 70-130
Acetone 86 70-130
2-Propanol 82 70-130
Carbon Disulfide 84 70-130
3-Chloropropene 87 70-130
Methylene Chloride 90 70-130
Methyl tert-butyl ether 88 70-130
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 87 70-130
Hexane 90 70-130
1,1-Dichloroethane 98 70-130
2-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone) 89 70-130
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 108 70-130
Tetrahydrofuran 86 70-130
Chloroform 101 70-130
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 93 70-130
Cyclohexane 87 70-130
Carbon Tetrachloride 108 70-130
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 88 70-130
Benzene 95 70-130
Heptane 93 70-130
Trichloroethene 106 70-130
1,2-Dichloropropane 93 70-130
1,4-Dioxane 93 70-130
Bromodichloromethane 100 70-130
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 101 70-130
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 88 70-130
Toluene 97 70-130
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 98 70-130
Tetrachloroethene 101 70-130
2-Hexanone 84 70-130
Page 37 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-12A

Method
Dibromochloromethane 102 70-130
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) 97 70-130
Chlorobenzene 96 70-130
Ethyl Benzene 95 70-130
m,p-Xylene 94 70-130
o-Xylene 97 70-130
Styrene 90 70-130
Bromoform 98 70-130
Cumene 95 70-130
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 88 70-130
Propylbenzene 90 70-130
4-Ethyltoluene 90 70-130
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 95 70-130
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 96 70-130
alpha-Chlorotoluene 90 70-130
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 88 70-130
Hexachlorobutadiene 90 70-130

Method
Toluene-d8 101 70-130
Page 38 of 48
Client Sample ID: LCSD
Lab ID#: 2002687A-12AA

Method
Freon 12 98 70-130
Freon 114 99 70-130
1,3-Butadiene 101 70-130
Freon 11 99 70-130
Ethanol 71 70-130
Freon 113 95 70-130
Acetone 92 70-130
2-Propanol 84 70-130
Hexane 93 70-130
Benzene 95 70-130
Heptane 92 70-130
1,4-Dioxane 92 70-130
Toluene 97 70-130
Page 39 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-12AA

Method
o-Xylene 98 70-130
Styrene 90 70-130
Bromoform 99 70-130
Cumene 95 70-130

Method
Toluene-d8 100 70-130
Page 40 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-12B

Method
Freon 12 102 70-130
Freon 114 110 70-130
1,3-Butadiene 108 70-130
Freon 11 114 70-130
Ethanol 103 70-130
Freon 113 112 70-130
Acetone 114 70-130
2-Propanol 101 70-130
Hexane 109 70-130
Benzene 98 70-130
Heptane 95 70-130
1,4-Dioxane 92 70-130
Toluene 95 70-130
Page 41 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-12B

Method
o-Xylene 95 70-130
Styrene 96 70-130
Bromoform 98 70-130
Cumene 95 70-130

Method
Page 42 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-12BB

Method
Freon 12 98 70-130
Freon 114 108 70-130
1,3-Butadiene 107 70-130
Freon 11 112 70-130
Ethanol 102 70-130
Freon 113 111 70-130
Acetone 109 70-130
2-Propanol 101 70-130
Hexane 108 70-130
Benzene 98 70-130
Heptane 93 70-130
1,4-Dioxane 96 70-130
Toluene 95 70-130
Page 43 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-12BB

Method
o-Xylene 93 70-130
Styrene 99 70-130
Bromoform 97 70-130
Cumene 95 70-130

Method
Page 44 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-12C

Method
Freon 12 101 70-130
Freon 114 94 70-130
1,3-Butadiene 102 70-130
Freon 11 100 70-130
Ethanol 92 70-130
Freon 113 92 70-130
Acetone 93 70-130
2-Propanol 106 70-130
Hexane 109 70-130
Benzene 94 70-130
Heptane 110 70-130
1,4-Dioxane 95 70-130
Toluene 98 70-130
2-Hexanone 107 70-130
Page 45 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-12C

Method
m,p-Xylene 104 70-130
o-Xylene 108 70-130
Styrene 111 70-130
Bromoform 102 70-130
Cumene 109 70-130

Method
Toluene-d8 100 70-130
Page 46 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-12CC

Method
Freon 12 110 70-130
Freon 114 105 70-130
1,3-Butadiene 107 70-130
Freon 11 106 70-130
Ethanol 99 70-130
Freon 113 100 70-130
Acetone 98 70-130
2-Propanol 109 70-130
Hexane 114 70-130
Benzene 97 70-130
Heptane 113 70-130
1,4-Dioxane 98 70-130
Toluene 100 70-130
2-Hexanone 107 70-130
Page 47 of 48
Lab ID#: 2002687A-12CC

Method
m,p-Xylene 105 70-130
o-Xylene 108 70-130
Styrene 111 70-130
Bromoform 101 70-130
Cumene 108 70-130

Method
Toluene-d8 100 70-130
Page 48 of 48
3/4/2020
Mr. Bill Schmierer
Kleinfelder
2882 Prospect Park Dr.
Suite 200
Rancho Cordova CA 95670
Project Name:
Project #: 20203368
Workorder #: 2002687B
Dear Mr. Bill Schmierer
The following report includes the data for the above referenced project for sample(s)
received on 2/26/2020 at Air Toxics Ltd.
The data and associated QC analyzed by Modified ASTM D-1946 are compliant with
the project requirements or laboratory criteria with the exception of the deviations noted
in the attached case narrative.
Thank you for choosing Eurofins Air Toxics Inc. for your air analysis needs. Eurofins Air
Toxics Inc. is committed to providing accurate data of the highest quality. Please feel free
to contact the Project Manager: Kelly Buettner at 916-985-1000 if you have any
questions regarding the data in this report.
Regards,
Kelly Buettner
Project Manager
Page 1 of 18
WORK ORDER #: 2002687B
Work Order Summary
CLIENT: Mr. Bill Schmierer BILL TO: Mr. Bill Schmierer

Kleinfelder Kleinfelder
2882 Prospect Park Dr. 2882 Prospect Park Dr.
Suite 200 Suite 200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
PHONE: 916-366-1701 P.O. #
FAX: PROJECT # 20203368
DATE RECEIVED: 02/26/2020 CONTACT: Kelly Buettner
DATE COMPLETED: 03/04/2020
RECEIPT FINAL
FRACTION # NAME TEST VAC./PRES. PRESSURE
01A VMP-3-3'-3'' Modified ASTM D-1946 7.5 "Hg 15 psi
02A VMP-2-3-5' Modified ASTM D-1946 7.5 "Hg 15 psi
03A VMP-2-14'8'' Modified ASTM D-1946 6.5 "Hg 15 psi
05A VMP-4-4' Modified ASTM D-1946 7.0 "Hg 15 psi
10A Lab Blank Modified ASTM D-1946 NA NA
11A LCS Modified ASTM D-1946 NA NA
11AA LCSD Modified ASTM D-1946 NA NA
CERTIFIED BY: DATE: 03/04/20
Technical Director
Certification numbers: AZ Licensure AZ0775, FL NELAP – E87680, LA NELAP – 02089, NH NELAP - 209218, NJ NELAP - CA016,
NY NELAP - 11291, TX NELAP - T104704434-18-13, UT NELAP – CA009332019-11, VA NELAP - 460197, WA NELAP - C935
Name of Accreditation Body: NELAP/ORELAP (Oregon Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program)
Accreditation number: CA300005-011, Effective date: 10/18/2019, Expiration date: 10/17/2020.
Eurofins Air Toxics, LLC certifies that the test results contained in this report meet all requirements of the NELAC standards
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Eurofins Air Toxics, LLC.
180 BLUE RAVINE ROAD, SUITE B FOLSOM, CA - 95630
(916) 985-1000 . (800) 985-5955 . FAX (916) 351-8279
Page 2 of 18
LABORATORY NARRATIVE
Modified ASTM D-1946
Kleinfelder
Workorder# 2002687B
Nine 1 Liter Summa Canister samples were received on February 26, 2020. The laboratory performed
analysis via Modified ASTM Method D-1946 for Helium in air using GC/TCD. The method involves
direct injection of 1.0 mL of sample.
Method modifications taken to run these samples are summarized in the table below. Specific project
requirements may over-ride the EATL modifications.
Requirement ASTM D-1946 ATL Modifications
Calibration A single point A minimum of 5-point calibration curve is performed.
calibration is performed Quantitation is based on average Response Factor.
using a reference
standard closely
matching the
composition of the
unknown.
Reference Standard The composition of any The standards used by ATL are blended to a >/= 95%
reference standard must accuracy.
be known to within
0.01 mol % for any
component.
Sample Injection Volume Components whose The sample container is connected directly to a fixed
concentrations are in volume sample loop of 1.0 mL on the GC. Linear range is
excess of 5 % should defined by the calibration curve. Bags are loaded by
not be analyzed by vacuum.
using sample volumes
greater than 0.5 mL.
Normalization Normalize the mole Results are not normalized. The sum of the reported
percent values by values can differ from 100% by as much as 15%, either
multiplying each value due to analytical variability or an unusual sample matrix.
by 100 and dividing by
the sum of the original
values. The sum of the
original values should
not differ from 100%
by more than 1.0%.
Precision Precision requirements Duplicates should agree within 25% RPD for detections >
established at each 5 X's the RL.
concentration level.
Receiving Notes
There were no receiving discrepancies.
Analytical Notes
There were no analytical discrepancies.
Page 3 of 18
Definition of Data Qualifying Flags
Seven qualifiers may have been used on the data analysis sheets and indicate as follows:
B - Compound present in laboratory blank greater than reporting limit.
J - Estimated value.
E - Exceeds instrument calibration range.
S - Saturated peak.
Q - Exceeds quality control limits.
U - Compound analyzed for but not detected above the detection limit.
M - Reported value may be biased due to apparent matrix interferences.
File extensions may have been used on the data analysis sheets and indicates
as follows:
a-File was requantified
b-File was quantified by a second column and detector
r1-File was requantified for the purpose of reissue
Page 4 of 18
NATURAL GAS ANALYSIS BY MODIFIED ASTM D-1946

Lab ID#: 2002687B-01A
No Detections Were Found.

Lab ID#: 2002687B-02A

Lab ID#: 2002687B-03A

Lab ID#: 2002687B-04A

Lab ID#: 2002687B-05A

Lab ID#: 2002687B-06A

Lab ID#: 2002687B-07A

Lab ID#: 2002687B-08A

Lab ID#: 2002687B-09A
Page 5 of 18

Lab ID#: 2002687B-09A
Page 6 of 18
Lab ID#: 2002687B-01A
File Name: 10022906c Date of Collection: 2/24/20 1:05:00 PM

Rpt. Limit Amount
Compound (%) (%)
Helium 0.13 Not Detected
Page 7 of 18
Lab ID#: 2002687B-02A
File Name: 10022907c Date of Collection: 2/25/20 8:41:00 AM

Rpt. Limit Amount
Compound (%) (%)
Page 8 of 18
Lab ID#: 2002687B-03A

Rpt. Limit Amount
Compound (%) (%)
Page 9 of 18
Lab ID#: 2002687B-04A

Rpt. Limit Amount
Compound (%) (%)
Page 10 of 18
Lab ID#: 2002687B-05A

Rpt. Limit Amount
Compound (%) (%)
Page 11 of 18
Lab ID#: 2002687B-06A

Rpt. Limit Amount
Compound (%) (%)
Page 12 of 18
Lab ID#: 2002687B-07A

Rpt. Limit Amount
Compound (%) (%)
Page 13 of 18
Lab ID#: 2002687B-08A

Rpt. Limit Amount
Compound (%) (%)
Page 14 of 18
Lab ID#: 2002687B-09A
File Name: 10022914c Date of Collection: 2/25/20 12:38:00 PM

Rpt. Limit Amount
Compound (%) (%)
Page 15 of 18
Lab ID#: 2002687B-10A
File Name: 10022903c Date of Collection: NA

Rpt. Limit Amount
Compound (%) (%)
Page 16 of 18
Lab ID#: 2002687B-11A

Method
Helium 98 85-115
Page 17 of 18
Lab ID#: 2002687B-11AA

Method
Helium 98 85-115
Page 18 of 18
Page 1 of 26
Page 2 of 26
Page 3 of 26
Page 4 of 26
Page 5 of 26
Page 6 of 26
Page 7 of 26
Page 8 of 26
Page 9 of 26
Page 10 of 26
Page 11 of 26
Page 12 of 26
Page 13 of 26
Page 14 of 26
Page 15 of 26
Page 16 of 26
Page 17 of 26
Page 18 of 26
Page 19 of 26
Page 20 of 26
Page 21 of 26
Page 22 of 26
Page 23 of 26
Page 24 of 26
Page 25 of 26
Page 26 of 26

Former Imperial Laundry Investigation Exhibit A - Maxie

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Former Imperial Laundry Investigation Exhibit A - Maxie

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

FORMER IMPERIAL LAUNDRY INVESTIGATION

1802 EAST CALIFORNIA AVENUE

MAY 15, 2020

Copyright 2020 Kleinfelder

20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page i of iv May 15, 2020

Ms. Kristina Chamberlin

FORMER IMPERIAL LAUNDRY INVESTIGATION

May 15, 2020

20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page ii of iv May 15, 2020

2 SITE BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................... 2

3 PRE FIELD INVESTIGATION .......................................................................................... 3

4 GROUNDWATER WELL INSTALLATION AND SAMPLING .......................................... 4

5 SOIL SAMPLING .............................................................................................................. 7

6 VMP INSTALLATION AND SAMPLING .......................................................................... 9

7 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ....................................................................................... 12

20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page iii of iv May 15, 2020

1 Site Location Map

1 Well Construction Details and Water Level Measurements

A City of Fresno Monitoring Well Permit

20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page iv of iv May 15, 2020

20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 1 of 22 May 15, 2020

20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 2 of 22 May 15, 2020

3.2 UTILITY CLEARANCE

20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 3 of 22 May 15, 2020

4.1 GROUNDWATER WELL LOCATION

4.2 DRILLING METHOD

4.3 WELL INSTALLATION

20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 4 of 22 May 15, 2020

4.4 WELL SURVEYING

4.5 WELL SAMPLING

Groundwater elevations were measured by Kleinfelder prior to collecting samples on February

4.6 SOIL CUTTINGS, DECON/PURGE WATER

20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 5 of 22 May 15, 2020

20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 6 of 22 May 15, 2020

5.1 SOIL BORING LOCATIONS

5.2 DRILLING METHOD

5.3 SOIL BORING LOCATION SURVEYING

20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 7 of 22 May 15, 2020

5.5 SOIL CUTTINGS AND BORING DESTRUCTION

5.6 LABORATORY ANALYSES

20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 8 of 22 May 15, 2020

6.1 VAPOR MONITORING POINT LOCATIONS

6.2 DRILLING METHOD

20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 9 of 22 May 15, 2020

6.4 VMP SURVEYING

6.5 VMP SAMPLING

20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 10 of 22 May 15, 2020

20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 11 of 22 May 15, 2020

Analytical laboratory results are included as Appendix E.

7.1 GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS

7.2 GROUNDWATER RESULTS

20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 12 of 22 May 15, 2020

Concentrations of 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, 4-ethyltoluene, and N-

7.3 SOIL SAMPLE RESULTS

Concentrations of 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene were detected in SB-2-25, SB-2-30, and SB-3-10 at

Concentrations of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene were detected in SB-2-25 and SB-2-30 at 60,000

20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 13 of 22 May 15, 2020

7.4 SOIL VAPOR RESULTS

Concentrations of PCE were detected in samples VMP-1-15’, VMP-5-4’9”, and VMP-6-15’ at

20203368.001A/SAC20R111699 Page 14 of 22 May 15, 2020

Cyclohexane was detected in VMP-2-14’8” at a concentration of 84 µg/m3, which exceeds the

Concentrations of toluene were detected in samples VMP-4-4’, VMP-6-3’6”, and VMP-6-15’ at

Cumeme (isopropylbenzene) was detected in VMP-4-4” and VMP-4-14’1” at concentrations of