Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Abstract. This research aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of a new instrument
for measuring vocational interest: Padjadjaran Interest Inventory (PII). There were 2,648
participants in this study, consisting of workers, high school, and university students, with
gender proportion of 1,014 (38.3%) males and 1,634 (61.7%) females. This research used
descriptive statistic test, t-test, and MANOVA for gender differences, reliability coefficients
and validity evidence by using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The results showed that
PII has a good psychometric properties: it has good reliability, and valid internal structure;
it is standardized by gender; and it is applicable for large groups with relative ease. PII can
be used for career exploration. Limitation of this study was discussed for future research.
Keywords: career development; interest inventory; vocational interest
1
Address for corespondence: sudarmo.wiyono@unpad.ac.id;
whisnu.yudiana@unpad.ac.id; urip.purwono@unpad.ac.id
ilham1301@mail.unpad.ac.id;
JURNAL PSIKOLOGI 19
YUDIANA, et all
20 JURNAL PSIKOLOGI
PADJADJARAN INTEREST INVENTORY: EVALUATION OF PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
JURNAL PSIKOLOGI 21
YUDIANA, et all
22 JURNAL PSIKOLOGI
PADJADJARAN INTEREST INVENTORY: EVALUATION OF PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
Descriptive statistical analysis was the maximum score is 56. In Activity item
conducted by using Statistical Product and format, ManWo had the lowest mean (20.04)
Service Solution (SPSS) 22.0 for Windows. On and Help had the highest mean (38.82). In
the other hand, the reliability was tested Competence item format, ManWo had the
using the psych package (Revelle, 2017) in R lowest mean (18.89) and Help had the
and CFA programming using lavaan highest mean (34.49). In Occupational item
package on R programming (Rosseel, 2012). format, ManWo had the lowest mean (17.30)
and Man had the highest mean (35.23). In
Procedure all three item formats, there isn’t any
skewness greater than 2 or less than -2. The
Data collection was conducted in the BPIP
same applies for kurtosis, there isn’t any
and Psychological Bureau in Bogor, based
area of the three item formats greater than
on the data collection process in the
2 or less than -2. This shows the normality
psychological test for the purpose of
of data (Field, 2009).
recruitment and employee selection
between 2011 to 2017. PII was used as one
Reliability
of the instruments in the psychological test.
The same procedure was used in data from Cronbach’s alpha was used in 18 interest
TPBK, namely deriving from a areas stated in Table 4. It can be seen that
psychological test for the mapping of estimated reliability for all interest areas is
student potential in the Faculty of relatively high with rvalue > 0.70, with the
Psychology, Universitas Padjadjaran lowest score is Man area in Occupation item
between 2013 to 2017. On the other hand, format (0.81) and the highest score is BusDe
data from the research was sourced from (0.92) in Activity item form. It shows that
eight high schools in Bandung. contents in item formats are homogeneous.
Administration Process was conducted
according to the manual (Yudiana et al., Validity evidence based on the internal
2011) by final-year students of Psychology structure
who already had test method subject.
Validity evidence by second-order confir-
matory factor analysis (CFA) showed that
Result the data fit the hypothesized model. This is
based on Table 5, showing indices of the
Descriptive Statistics goodness of fit. In more detail, RMSEA falls
within a range of 0.05 - 0.08. Almost all
This section elaborates mean score,
values for CFI, GFI, NFI, and NNFI are >
standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis
0.90, except that in DatPr and SosSc the GFI
of PII instrument, as shown in Table 3. The
values are 0.88.
minimum score of each area in PII is 8 and
JURNAL PSIKOLOGI 23
24
Table 3.
Descriptive statistics of interest scale in PII (n=2,648)
Item format
Activity Competence Occupation
Area
M SD Skew Kurtosis M SD Skew Kurtosis M SD Skew Kurtosis
SosF 31.59 9.38 -0.01 -0.32 31.77 8.88 -0.05 -0.04 30.34 8.82 -0.21 -0.24
Man 36.40 8.57 -0.30 0.16 34.35 8.37 -0.19 0.12 35.23 9.12 -0.44 0.15
BusDe 32.07 10.65 -0.07 -0.37 30.98 9.69 -0.04 -0.20 30.47 10.49 -0.09 -0.45
DatPr 30.11 9.80 0.07 -0.52 26.29 8.49 0.34 -0.14 29.06 10.51 -0.06 -0.53
Mec 26.58 11.77 0.31 -0.71 20.54 9.41 0.76 0.14 28.33 12.02 0.10 -0.74
Nat 32.92 10.75 -0.12 -0.53 28.09 9.49 0.08 -0.34 29.08 11.16 -0.02 -0.60
Art 37.26 10.13 -0.44 -0.23 30.98 9.36 -0.07 -0.28 33.27 10.55 -0.21 -0.47
Help 38.32 9.55 -0.47 -0.08 34.39 8.74 -0.16 -0.06 33.19 10.30 -0.28 -0.43
Inf 29.20 9.05 0.05 -0.29 25.74 8.67 0.25 -0.22 28.20 10.09 0.14 -0.44
BusSys 28.80 10.22 0.02 -0.38 25.19 9.49 0.16 -0.45 27.94 10.62 0.03 -0.45
FinAn 30.17 10.91 -0.04 -0.49 26.70 10.03 0.15 -0.38 26.93 10.53 0.10 -0.46
YUDIANA, et all
Scie 33.04 9.56 -0.24 -0.20 27.48 8.85 0.00 -0.34 27.68 10.64 -0.07 -0.64
SosSc 34.58 11.38 -0.28 -0.60 28.19 10.32 0.08 -0.54 33.66 11.56 -0.35 -0.64
QuaC 27.06 9.06 0.13 -0.31 24.68 8.33 0.23 -0.25 22.12 9.19 0.35 -0.50
ManWo 20.04 9.73 0.65 -0.30 18.89 8.66 0.76 0.08 17.30 8.95 0.84 -0.03
PerSer 33.88 10.21 -0.18 -0.40 30.03 8.98 0.02 -0.26 26.02 9.49 0.14 -0.51
ConsRep 24.69 10.04 0.39 -0.37 21.42 8.94 0.59 -0.15 19.18 9.52 0.65 -0.31
BasSer 28.63 9.70 0.06 -0.32 30.09 9.19 -0.08 -0.24 24.14 9.19 0.19 -0.49
JURNAL PSIKOLOGI
PADJADJARAN INTEREST INVENTORY: EVALUATION OF PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
Table 4.
Reliability of interest area of PII
Table 5.
Goodness of fit indices
JURNAL PSIKOLOGI 25
YUDIANA, et all
Table 6.
Summary of factor loading, Average Variance Extracted (AVE) and construct reliability
26 JURNAL PSIKOLOGI
Table 7.
Mean of group differences in each interest area
JURNAL PSIKOLOGI
Man 36.89 (8.81) 36.10 (8.40) 2.32* -0.13 35.10 (8.79) 33.88 (8.06) 3.60 -0.21 35.31 (9.41) 35.18 (8.93) 0.35 -0.02
BusDe 31.81 (10.71) 32.23 (10.60) -0.99 0.06 30.99 (9.95) 30.98 (9.53) 0.04 0.00 30.43 (10.45) 30.49 (10.52) -0.15 0.01
DatPr 34.73 (9.54) 27.25 (8.83) 20.57 -1.15 30.00 (8.99) 23.99 (7.28) 17.96 -1.04 32.54 (10.39) 26.90 (9.99) 13.90 -0.78
Mec 33.07 (11.35) 22.56 (10.12) 24.15 -1.38 24.85 (10.09) 17.86 (7.85) 18.80 -1.09 32.14 (12.25) 25.96 (11.25) 13.03 -0.74
NatOut 33.21 (10.73) 32.75 (10.76) 1.07 -0.06 28.20 (9.56) 28.02 (9.46) 0.47 -0.03 29.14 (11.26) 29.04 (11.10) 0.22 -0.01
Art 34.40 (10.54) 39.03 (9.45) -11.44 0.65 29.62 (9.77) 31.83 (9.00) -5.81 0.33 32.27 (10.86) 33.89 (10.30) -3.86 0.22
Help 34.80 (9.20) 40.50 (9.10) -15.60 0.88 32.16 (8.81) 35.78 (8.41) -10.55 0.59 28.89 (9.77) 35.86 (9.70) -17.93 1.01
Inf 29.53 (9.25) 28.99 (8.92) 1.49 -0.08 26.44 (9.00) 25.30 (8.44) 3.23 -0.18 28.50 (10.43) 28.01 (9.87) 1.21 -0.07
BusSys 30.01 (10.38) 28.05 (10.06) 4.83 -0.27 26.15 (9.71) 24.59 (9.31) 4.12 -0.23 30.07 (10.88) 26.62 (10.24) 8.10 -0.46
FinAn 31.25 (11.06) 29.50 (10.76) 4.02 -0.23 27.62 (10.26) 26.12 (9.85) 3.74 -0.21 28.03 (10.88) 26.25 (10.25) 4.18 -0.24
Scie 32.28 (9.88) 33.52 (9.33) -3.23 0.18 27.01 (9.20) 27.76 (8.61) -2.11* 0.12 28.32 (10.81) 27.27 (10.52) 2.47* -0.14
SosSc 29.90 (10.83) 37.49 (10.73) -17.64 1.00 25.20 (10.05) 30.04 (10.06) -12.03 0.68 28.85 (11.13) 36.64 (10.80) -17.85 1.01
QuaC 29.15 (9.43) 25.77 (8.57) 9.27 -0.53 26.77 (8.67) 23.38 (7.83) 10.13 -0.58 23.87 (9.75) 21.04 (8.65) 7.58 -0.43
ManWo 23.13 (10.00) 18.13 (9.04) 12.97 -0.74 22.63 (9.06) 16.56 (7.53) 17.83 -1.03 20.01 (9.50) 15.62 (8.15) 12.19 -0.70
PerSer 28.69 (9.69) 37.11 (9.13) -22.52 1.26 27.26 (8.88) 31.75 (8.60) -12.89 0.73 24.86 (9.65) 26.74 (9.32) -5.00 0.28
ConsRep 28.58 (10.24) 22.28 (9.12) 16.03 -0.92 25.68 (9.25) 18.77 (7.63) 19.94 -1.15 22.86 (9.85) 16.90 (8.56) 15.88 -0.91
BasSer 27.17 (9.91) 29.53 (9.46) -6.13 0.34 29.03 (9.17) 30.75 (9.14) -4.70 0.27 22.36 (9.32) 25.24 (8.93) -7.85 0.45
Explanation: ** significant with < 0.01 and * significant with < 0.05
PADJADJARAN INTEREST INVENTORY: EVALUATION OF PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
27
YUDIANA, et all
28 JURNAL PSIKOLOGI
PADJADJARAN INTEREST INVENTORY: EVALUATION OF PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
despite that the sample size was quite large individuals with unclear career choices. PII
and varied by age, gender and employment has good psychometric properties, both in
status, they were geographically limited as terms of consistency and the measurement
most of the data was only from one region, fit with the construct being used. In
namely West Java and a small section of addition, this research finds that there are
Jakarta. The l`arge sample size that gender differences in interest preferences
represents Indonesia is essential, that the norming by gender becomes
considering that Indonesia varies in terms important. This research also proves that
of ethnicity in each region. In addition, the PII can be used for individuals within
sample size for the employed status was Super’s career stage of exploration (Super,
relatively limited, and therefore this could 1990). Therefore, PII can help individuals in
be expanded. career choices and assist the process of
The second limitation is related to career counseling in order to make the right
validity evidence. This research still career choice.
focused on validity evidence based on
internal structure. PII resulted significantly Recommendation
higher scores compared to other existing Further research on the psychometric
interest and personality instruments. property should be directed in the
Therefore, further research regarding expansion of sample in relation to norms in
relationship between scores obtained and Indonesia, predicted validity and other
similar instruments is required. This can instruments, and the development of PII
help facilitate the interpretation of scores with a briefer format using item response
resulted from PII. theory. In addition, due to the
The third limitation is related to the advancement of technology, development
considerable number of items and the of web-based PII should be considered as it
existence of relatively low factor loading faces a generation intensely engaging with
items. Development of PII with a more technology. Therefore, PII can have
briefer format without compromising promising development in measuring
quality of the result is essential for the time vocational interests.
efficiency of data collection. Research on
this briefer format corresponds with the References
researches on existing interest inventories
(Tracey, 2010). Item response theory Betz, N. E., Harmon, L. W., & Borgen, F. H.
approach can be used to rule out the low (1996). The relationships of self-efficacy
factor loading items. for the Holland themes to gender,
occupational group membership, and
vocational interests. Journal of
Conclusion
Counseling Psychology, 43(1), 90.
PII is a new interest inventory that can help Bloye, J. E. (2007). Vocational interest and
identify individual interest in future career other non-cognitive factor as predictors of
direction. The advantages of this academic performance in high school.
instrument are that it doesn’t only measure Thesis: University of Johannesburg
individual vocational interest, but also
Elena, M. A. (2014). The role of gender in
individual competence belief to perform
the formation of vocational interests
the career choice. This certainly could assist
and career orientation in adolescence.
JURNAL PSIKOLOGI 29
YUDIANA, et all
Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational Li, X., & Yang, X. (2016). Effects of learning
choices: A theory of personality and work styles and interest on concentration
environments (2nd ed.). New Jersey: and achievement of students in mobile
Prentice Hall. learning. Journal of Educational
Computing Research, 54(7), 922–945. doi:
Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational
10.1177/0735633116639953
choices: A theory of vocational personalities
and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa: Long, L., Adams, R. S., & Tracey, T. J. G.
Psychological Assessment Resources. (2005). Generalizability of interest
structure to China: Application of the
Hooper, D., Coughan, J., & Mullen, M. R.
Personal Globe Inventory. Journal of
(2008). Structural equation modelling:
Vocational Behavior, 66(1), 66–80. doi:
Guidelines for determining model fit.
10.1016/j.jvb.2003.12.004
Journal of Business and Research Methods,
6(1), 53–60. Maree, J. G., & Taylor, N. (2016). Develop-
ment of the maree career matrix: A new
Jansen, M., Lüdtke, O., & Schroeders, U.
interest inventory. South African Journal
(2016). Evidence for a positive relation
of Psychology, 46(4), 462–476. doi:
between interest and achievement:
10.1177/0081246316641558
Examining between-person and
within-person variation in five McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002).
domains. Contemporary Educational Principles and practice in reporting
Psychology, 46, 116–127. doi: 10.1016/ structural equation analyses. Psycho-
j.cedpsych.2016.05.004 logical Methods, 7(1), 64–82.
Kaplan, R. M., & Sacuzzo, D. M. (2005). Miller, K. M. (1958). Manual for the Rothwell
30 JURNAL PSIKOLOGI
PADJADJARAN INTEREST INVENTORY: EVALUATION OF PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
Sharf, R. S. (2006). Applying career develop- Tracey, T. J. G., & Rounds, J. (1997). Circular
ment theory to counseling. Belmont, CA structure of vocational interests.
Thomson: Nelson Education. Washington DC: American Psycho-
logical Association.
Sireci, S. G., & Sukin, T. (2013). Test
validity. In K. F. Geisinger (Ed.), APA Tracey, T. J. G., & Rounds, J. B. (1992).
handbook of testing and assessment in Evaluating the RIASEC circumplex
psychology (pp. 85–100). Washington using high-point codes. Journal of
DC: American Psychological Vocational Behavior, 41, 295–311.
Association. Volodina, A., & Nagy, G. (2016). Vocational
Sodano, S. M., & Tracey, T. J. G. (2008). choices in adolescence : The role of
Prestige in interest activity assessment. gender, school achievement, self-
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(2), 310– concepts, and vocational interests.
317. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.07.002 Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95–96, 58–
73. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2016.07.005
Super, D. E. (1990). A life-span, life-space
approach to career development. Yudiana, W. (2011). Perancangan dan
Dalam: Brown & L. Brooks (Eds.), evaluasi instrumen pengukuran minat
Career choice and development: Applying untuk siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas
contemporary theories to practice (2nd ed., Negeri di kota Bandung. Unpublished
pp. 197–261). San Fransisco: Josey-Bass. manuscript, Padjadjaran University.
Suwartono, C. (2016). Alat tes psikologi Yudiana, W., Purwono, U., & Wiyono, S.
konteks indonesia: Tantangan psikolo- (2011). Technical manual padjadjaran
gi di era MEA. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat, interest iventory. Bandung. Retrieved
3(1), 6. doi: 10.24854/jpu12016-51 from https://www.researchgate.net/
publication/326292604_Technical_Man
Šverko, I. (2008). Spherical model of
ual_Padjadjaran_Interest_Inventory
JURNAL PSIKOLOGI 31