Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Gospel of John
Book of Signs
Introduction
The gospel of John, according to Horst, is ‘the most enigmatic’ among the four gospel, it
is considered as “difficult to understand, so theological, so philosophical, so different”1. The
other three gospels fall under ‘synoptics’. Thus, true to be described as, the gospel of John is
“like water where infant can safely paddle and an elephant can swim”2, the simplicity yet depth
is clearly seen.
In the gospel of John, the prominent Johannine interpreter Raymond Brown, I believe,
divided the gospel into four parts, namely, Prologue (1:1-18), book of Signs (1:19-12:50), book
of Glory (13:1-20:31), and Epilogue (21:1-25). The prologue introduces Jesus as the logos, ‘the
personified Word of God’. The book of signs, which is the focus of this paper, was a series of
“events that clearly illustrate the salvific message of Jesus”3. The book of Glory was centered at
“Jesus’ death as climax of his earthly journey, as glorification, as enthronization”4. Lastly, the
epilogue portrays a “series of resurrection appearances in Galilee”5.
One of the focus of the gospel is ‘the Father’, in which it is seen as an “assertion of Jesus’
claim to be God’s chosen agent, authorized by God to make a definitive revelation of God’s life-
giving purpose.”6 It is more affirmed by the book itself, wherein it states,
“30 Jesus performed many other signs in the presence of his disciples, which are
not recorded in this book. 31 But these are written that you may believe [a] that Jesus
is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his
name.” (John 20:30-31)
From this statement, we can already point out what the “signs” (sēmeia) made by Jesus all about.
1
Horst, Rudolf. A Stroll In the Garden of the Bible: Hopefully a more enjoyable introduction to the Old
and New Testaments. Manila: Logos Publications, Inc., 2008. 147.
2
Ibid.
3
ibid. 150
4
Ibid.
5
Brown, Robert. The Gospel of St. John and the Johnnine Epistles. Minnesota: The Liturgical Press,
1982. 10.
6
Carter, Warren. John: Storyteller, interpreter, and Evangelist. USA: Hendrickson Publishers, Inc., 2006.
25.
The signs, miracles in the synoptic gospel, performed is ‘easily misconstrued’. After
seeing the signs, the crowd wanted to elevate him as the messiah. However, “in the first century
miracle had no universally acknowledged meaning,”7 so there have been some who use
divination to considered as someone who consider them, the rabbi, the emperor and magician, as
‘divine man,’ who are being accused of practicing magic, though they have no criteria that
directly pertain to them. Despite the situation, the hope of the people to have someone “who
would liberate Israel from political oppression and rule the people with righteousness”8 remained
in them.
The signs were seven (7) due to its Jewish background: “The Sabbath was kept as a ‘holy
day’ every seventh day. The period from the Passover to Pentecost lasted seven times seven
days. The major Jewish feasts and rites of purification are made to last seven days. Seven kinds
of gifts are suitable for sacrifice in the Temple. The menorah, the candlestick in the sanctuary,
had seven branches. Seven is the symbolic number to express sacredness and prosperity or good
fortunes. Let us not forget that seven reminds also of the creation of the world with the seventh
as the climax.”9
Most miracle narratives have structure: Setting (location, character, & problem), miracle,
response
"The Book of Signs": 1:19—12:50 (Wedding at Cana; Temple Incident; Dialogue with Nicodemus;
Royal Official's Son; Samaritan Woman at the Well; Healing at the Bethesda Pool; Feeding 5000 & Bread of Life
Discourse; Conflicts in Jerusalem; Man Born Blind & Good Shepherd Discourse; Raising of Lazarus; Anointing at
Bethany; Plots to Kill Jesus; etc.)
I. First week of the messianic ministry: Jesus revealed as the Messiah. The week ends with the first 'sign' at Cana
(1:19—2:11)
II. First Passover with its accompanying events, ending with the second 'sign' at Cana (2:12—4:54)
III. Sabbath 'of the paralytic': Jesus cures the man at the Bethzatha pool (5:1-47)
IV. The Passover 'of the bread of life': miracle of the loaves and the subsequent discourse (6:1-71)
V. The feast of Tabernacles with the cure of the man born blind (7:1—10:21)
VI. The feast of Dedication and the resurrection of Lazarus (10:22—11:54)
Plan of John from "The Gospels and Epistles of John: A Concise Commentary"
(by Raymond E. Brown; emphasizes characters and feasts)
1:19—12:50 PART ONE: THE BOOK OF SIGNS
The Word reveals himself to the world and to his own, but they will not accept him.
PART ONE may be subdivided into four sections:
1. seven days of gradual revelation of Jesus (1:19—2:11)
2. themes in 2:1—4:54
a) the replacement of Old Testament institutions:
CANA - replacement of Jewish purifications (2:1-11)
JERUSALEM - replacement of the Temple (2:13-25)
NICODEMUS - replacement of the birth into the Chosen People (3:1-36)
SAMARITAN WOMAN - replacement of worship in Jerusalem (4:1-42)
Second Cana Miracle closing the section (4:43-54)
b) reaction to Jesus by individuals representing a class:
OFFICIAL JUDAISM (at Jerusalem)
Temple authorities (2:13-25)
Nicodemus the Pharisee (3:1-36)
SAMARITAN (4:1-42)
ROYAL OFFICIAL (Galileans; 4:43-54)
3. themes in 5:1—10:42
a) the replacement of Old Testament feasts:
THE SABBATH - Jesus, the new Moses, replaces the Sabbath ordinance (5:1-47)
PASSOVER - the Bread of Life (revelatory wisdom and the eucharist) replaces the manna (6:1-71)
TABERNACLES - the Source of living water, the Light of the world, replaces the water and light
ceremonies (7:1—10:21)
DEDICATION - Jesus is consecrated in place of the Temple altar (10:22-42)
b) the theme of life (begun in 2:1—4:54) is developed in 5:1—7:52; the theme of light is developed in 8:1—
10:42
(particularly in the healing of man born blind)
4. the Lazarus theme (11:1—12:36)
The raising to life of Lazarus leads directly to the condemnation of Jesus. Lazarus is present at the anointing of
Jesus
for burial (12:1-8), and enthusiasm over the miracle performed in his favor occasions the Palm Sunday scene
(12:9-36).
The raising of Lazarus is the culmination of the life-light themes.
Outline of the Structure of the Gospel from "Sacra Pagina: The Gospel of John"
(by Francis J. Moloney, S.D.B.; emphasizes different structures in different sections)
Book of Signs
17
ibid. 85
18
ibid. 86
19
ibid.
20
ibid.
21
ibid. 88.
22
Ibid. 89.
- “Jesus. second sign enacts God’s purpose for wholeness. Disease was rife in the world
ruled by imperial Rome. Health and wholeness demonstrate the establishment of God’s
reign.”23
23
Carter. 38
24
Koester. 90
25
ibid.
26
Ibid. 92
27
Carter. 38
28
Koester. 92
- According to Carter, Jesus’ actions were perceived from different points of departure,
and, hopefully, “bring them to the perspective of the disciples, who exhibit genuine
faith.”29
- Crowd “followed Jesus because of the signs, …hoped that Jesus would continue doing
signs.”30
- Jesus is considered as “the prophet who is to come into the world” (6:14) Timing, that
invites us for our response, for it was performed during the “Passover, which
commemorated Israel’s deliverance from Egypt from Moses’s leadership.”31 Another
instance is by the traditions of Elisha and Elijah, who were expecting of the appearance
of a miracle-working prophet who is to appear before the day of the Lord. After which,
they wanted Him to be declared as king. “The Messiah was not specifically identified as a
miracle-worker, but there were expectations that the messianic age would be
accompanied by signs like those of the Mosaic period. (Mic 7:15; Isa 48:20-21)”32 It is,
then, evident that as long as someone provides them food, they are ready to acclaim that
person as king, as “Jesus did the work of Elijah and Elisha and fulfilled the promises
concerning the Mosaic prophet identified in Duetoronomy”33 (Moses has written about
Him.) However, “they have failed to recognize the difference between the power that
comes from God above and the power that relies on the favor of the masses below –
something that will be made clear in Jesus’ remarks to Pilate about kingship (18:36-37)
29
ibid. 94.
30
ibid. 94.
31
Ibid. 95
32
Ibid 96
33
Ibid.
Exod. 3:14 – I am who Am
Duet. 31:39 – Behold, behold that I am and there is no other god besides me
Isa. 45:18 – I am and there is no other
o “Shows that Jesus was the one in whom God’s name and identity were
revealed.”34
o Evident to Gentiles and the Jews.
Jn. 18:6 – on the Passover, “both Romans and Jewish soldiers will be sent
to arrest Jesus, and when Jesus tells them, “I am” (egō eimi) they all draw
back and fall to the ground as people do in the presence of the divine.”35
o Greek and Roman mythology have overtones of divinity in ‘I am’, has divine
overtones
- “wanted to receive Him into the boat.” (6:21) receive (lambanein) “emerged in the
previous chapter, where Jesus reproved his opponents by saying, “I have come in my
Father’s name, and you do not receive me,” yet ”if another comes in his own name, you
will receive him. (5:43) Where Jesus’ opponents refused to receive Him, the disciples on
the sea do receive him – precisely as the one who comes in the name of God, the I am.”36
- (6:22-71) “Demanding of the Jesus act on one’s own terms is a form of unbelief… to suit
their own liking… those whose perceptions are shaped by Jesus words can rightly discern
the meaning of the signs, while those who try to fit the signs into other frames of
reference cannot”37
- “He gave them / bread from heaven / to eat.” (6:30-31)
o “he” was confuse of being Moses, instead of God. The verb of the statement was
in past tense, however, God is giving us the bread of life in our daily activity, “It
was not Moses who gave you the bread from heaven; my father gives you the true
bread from heaven,” (6:32) which is what he is currently doing. The object of the
verb does not only pertain to the Israelite people, but to ‘the world’ in particular
o “I am the bread of life” (6:35, 48), not an association to Moses. Life, not merely
by physical attribute, but ones relation to God, meaning eternal life. Death is not
34
Ibid. 98.
35
Ibid.
36
ibid. 99
37
Ibid
considered as threat for those who believe, for they will be raised at the end of
time. And there seems to be an interplay of themes, such as, word (Deut.8:3 – one
does not live by bread alone but by everything that proceeds out of the mouth of
the Lord; Amos8:11 - Amos warned of a famine, not of bread, but of hearing the
word of the Lord) , wisdom (the manna eaten by Israel was the divine Word from
which wisdom flows) and law (Exo16:4 – to gather a portion… to show “whether
they will walk in my law or not,” John6:45 - for all who came to Him will be
taught by God.) “The words bred of life seems to echo the expression law of life,
… the call of Wisdom to “come, eat my bread”(Prov.9:5), an invitation to study
the law(Genesis Rabbah 70:5). The focus of John is not the scriptures as the
bread, but witnesses to Jesus, true and living bread. Scripture promised, but life is
given by Jesus. in Jewish tradition, Euripides acknowledged that the essentials for
life were grain and water, and others affirmed that where bread is lacking, death
soon result. It was affirmed by Democritus, “he was kept alive for several days by
the smell of fresh bread in his nosetrils,”38 (ex. Roman trad. – Demeter ‘goddess
of grain’, those who eat should recognize her as its divine source.
- “The section 6:51c-58 is mostly plausibly understood as alluding to the Eucharist, whose
‘institution’ is omitted from John’s account of the Last Supper. It is remarkable for
interpreting this sacrament not primarily as a memorial of Jesus’ death, but rather as
spiritual food, enabling the mutual indwelling of believer and Jesus, and leading to
everlasting life; compare Ignatius’ description of the one Eucharistic bread as ‘the
medicine of immortality, an antidote that we should not die, but live for ever with Jesus
Christ(Eph.20:2)”39
38
Ibid. 102
39
Edwards, Ruth B. Discovering John: Content, interpretation, reception. Great Britain: Ashford Colour
Press, 2003. 67.
- “Suffering was not always the result of some particular transgression. Instead of trying to
look back to determine what lay behind the (congenital) blindness, Jesus looked ahead to
what he might do with the blindness… that God’s work might be revealed in him.”40
- . Did not understand: 1. Disciples – blindness; 2. neighbors – cure; 3. Authorities –
against healing on the Sabbath (Jesus is a sinner for he contravened Sabbath law, but
lawbreakers should not be able to do miracles and miracle-workers should not break the
law.) a verdict was issued before the investigation was completed which violates legal
tradition
- “If the opening scenes make clear that sin was not manifested in the beggar’s physical
blindness or in Jesus miraculously giving sight on the Sabbath, the final scene shows that
sin was manifested in the blindness of unbelief” (9:39-41)
- “He is a prophet” in relation to the miracle.
- Siloam/ Shiloah (God once sent) to Shiloh, to be a name of a Messiah
- Outside the synagogue, when the beggar recognizes Jesus’ divinity. Non-jews familiar of
various dieties opening the eyes of the blind, but Jesus is seen not as another diety in the
pantheon, but a figure with a distinctive and exclusive role.
- Gate and Good Shepherd.41 Themes: light, water, and shepherding
o I am the gate. Expulsion from the synagogue, only after he has been put out of the
synagogue, does the beggar worshipped him. Yet the promise of salvation does
not eliminate the threat of danger, but sustains his followers.
o Saved – life – relation with God – life everlasting, beyond physical death
o Shepherding was a metaphor for leadership (good shepherd and hired man)
o Shepherd imagery helps convey the prophetic and messianic dimensions of Jesus’
identity
o Shepherd imagery was also used for God… calling Jesus the good Shepherd
underscores his unity with the God who sent him
o good shepherd imagery help integrate the human, messianic and divine
dimensions of Jesus’ identity into a coherent whole… not only by teaching but by
40
Koester. 105
41
ibid. 109
giving his life for others… through his self-sacrifice that God’s love for the world
is made known.
o The people of God find their identity in relation to the gate and the good
shepherd. (voice, evokes a response of belief or unbelief)
- “The healing of the blind beggar and its aftermath demonstrated how difficult it could be
to give a simple answer concerning Jesus’ identity and actions,… insuperable
contradiction: the Messiah was to be a human being, and a human being was not God.”
- Obedience, Jesus’ unity with God, even to the point of laying down his life for others.
Jesus’ works are the works of his father (10:37) and he could not perform them unless
God empowered his to do so.
- Ironic, Jesus’ opponent turn out to be the sinners who oppose God
42
ibid. 118
o 11:9-10, “Jesus alludes to the idea of God appointed a certain period in which
Jesus was to minister, so that during that time he could face the dangers of Jude
with impunity.”43
o 11:12-13, “when Jesus explains that he is going to awaken Lazarus from sleep,
using sleep as a euphemism for death.”44
- “Death palpable as Jesus returns to Bethany in Judea, for when he arrives, Lazarus has
been in the tomb(since death, washed, anointed, and wraped, not embalmed) for four(4)
days.”45
- “I am the resurrection and the life” (11:25a). resurrection - the one “who believes in me,
though he dies, yet shall live(11:25b). life – anyone “who lives and believes in me will
never die”(11:26a) Paradox: will die but will be brought back to life and will never die.
- Understanding of the resurrection varied:
o To everlasting life and everlasting shame (Dan. 12:2)
o Only righteous would be raised to life and wicked would remain dead forever
(2Macc.7:14)
o All to be raised and judged according to their deeds (Jn. 5:28-29)
o Transform the body into glory (Dan. 12:3)
o Bodies of the dead would be restored physically (2Macc7:10-11)
o Hope for the righteous who kept the law of Moses (2Macc7:9)
o Would find life in the world to come
- An idea that people did “never die” because their souls lived on.
- “Treats the person as a whole,… death is real but not final, and promising that through
resurrection the faithful will be brought into life everlasting,”46 which is evident with
Lazarus, that brings hope.
- People – relationship with God – through faith – eternal life
- Martha: “I believe that you are the Christ, the Son of God, he who is coming into the
world.” (11:27)
43
ibid. 117
44
ibid
45
Ibid
46
ibid.
o Identifies Jesus as the fulfillment of the Jewish messianic expectations.
o Divine dimension that does not seem evident.
- Mary: “Lord, if you had been here, my brother would not have died.”
o Conviction that Lazarus died because Jesus was absent, yet no explanation was
given, but also weeps.
o Jesus’ tears show how much he loved Lazarus
o Presumption that Jesus can heal, he could have also prevented the death of
Lazarus, yet the delay calls his love into question
o “He does not show love by exempting his followers from death but by bringing
them through death into life everlasting through resurrection.”47
- Calling Lazarus confirms the integrity of Jesus’ claim
o Primary level of sign’s meaning, Christological
o “I have said this for the sake of the crowd standing here, so that they may believe
that you sent me” (11:42)
o to portray what will happen in the future
o anticipates the final resurrection
o second level of meaning, concerns the believers
o correlation of Jesus words and action, shows he is worthy of trust, that creates a
relationship with God, who sent him
o faith relationship results to life, life everlasting
- frame of references
o Jesus’ words to Martha
o Crowd who reported him to authority as miracle-worker, seen as political threat
o Promising national hero
o By raising the dead, Jesus would gain an impressive popular following
Conclusion
47
Ibid. 122
“30 Jesus performed many other signs in the presence of his disciples, which are
not recorded in this book. 31 But these are written that you may believe [a] that Jesus
is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his
name.” (John 20:30-31)
Truly, what John wanted to emphasize is on the verse above, which denotes a deep
theological understand of obedience and commitment to the will of the father “is
finished.” (19:30)
Bibliography
Brown, Raymond E. The Gospel of St. John and the Johannine Epistles: Introductory
and Commentary. Minnesota: The Liturgical Press. 1982
Flanagan, Neal M. The Gospel according to John and the Johannine Epistles. Minnesota:
The Liturgical Press. 1983.
Horst, Rudolf. A Stroll In the Garden of the Bible: Hopefully a more enjoyable
introduction to the Old and New Testaments. Manila: Logos Publications, Inc.,
2008.
Koester, Craig R. Symbolism in the Fourth Gospel: Meaning, Mystery and Community.
Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2003.
Lewis, Scott M. The Gospel according to John and the Johannine Letters. Minnesota:
The Liturgical Press. 2005.