Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 4

THE LAW ON PERSONS & FAMILY RELATIONS

Course Syllabus

I. INTRODUCTION
II. EFFECT AND APPLICATION OF LAWS

a) When law takes effect

i) NCC 2
ii) Exec. Order 200, June 18, 1987, Sec. 2

▪ Tañada v. Tuvera 136 SCRA 27


▪ Commissioner v Hypermix, G.R. No. 179579, February 1, 2012

b) Ignorance of the law

i) NCC 3

▪ Elegado v. Court of Appeals, 173 SCRA 285

c) Retroactivity of laws

i) NCC 4, cf. NCC 2252 - 2269


ii) Revised Penal Code (RPC) 22
iii) Family Code (FC) 256

▪ Simon v Chan, G.R. No. 157547, February 23, 2011

d) Mandatory or Prohibitory Laws

i) NCC Art. 5 with NCC Art. 17 (3)

▪ Nerwin v PNOC, G.R. No. 167057, April 11, 2012

e) Waiver of rights

i) NCC Art. 6
ii) NCC Art. 2035

▪ DM Consunji vs. CA, G.R. No. 137873, April 20, 2001


▪ Villareal v People, G.R.No.151258, February1, 2012

f) Repeal of laws

i) NCC 7
ii) 1987 Constitution, Art. XVIII Sec. 3
iii) FC 254, 255

▪ Kida v Senate, G.R. No. 196271, February 28, 2012

g) Judicial Decisions

i) NCC 8

▪ Virtucio v Alegarbes, G.R. No. 187451, August 29, 2012


▪ Republic v. Renman Enterprises, GR 199319, Feb. 19, 2014

1
h) Duty to render judgment

i) NCC 9, 10
ii) RPC 5

▪ Barcellano v Barza, GR 165287, September 14, 2011

i) Presumption and Applicability of Custom

i) NCC 11 - 12
ii) 1987 Constitution, Art. XII Sec. 5
iii) Rules of Court Rule 129 (2), (3)

▪ Martinez v. Van Buskirk, 18 Phil. 79

j) Legal periods

i) NCC 13
ii) Rules of Court (ROC) Rule 22
iii) RAC Sec. 31

▪ Internal Revenue v Primetown, GR 162155, August 28, 2007


▪ Montajes v People, G.R. No. 183449, March 12, 2012

k) Applicability of Penal Laws

i) NCC 14, 17(3), RPC Art. 2

l) Binding effect

i) NCC 15
ii) FC 26 par. 2

▪ Van Dorn v. Romillo 139 SCRA 139


▪ Pilapil v. Ibay-Somera 174 SCRA 653
▪ Recio v. Recio 366 SCRA 437
▪ Quita v. CA 300 SCRA 406
▪ Perez v. CA G.R. No. 162580 January 27, 2007
▪ Lavadia v. Heirs of Luna 730 SCRA 376
▪ ATCI Overseas Corp vs. Echin, G.R. No. 178551, Oct. 11, 2010
▪ Tuna Processing Inc. v Phil. Kingford, 185582, Feb. 29, 2012

iii) NCC 16
▪ Amos v Bellis, 20 SCRA 358

iv) NCC 17
▪ Raytheon v Rouzie, GR 162894, February 26, 2008

v) NCC 18
▪ Tamano v Ortiz, G.R. No. 126603, June 29, 1998

2
III. Human Relations (Arts 19-36, NCC)

a) Principle of Abuse of Rights

▪ Pantaleon vs. American Express International, Inc.,G.R. No. 174269,


August 25, 2010
▪ Manaloto vs. Veloso III, G.R. No. 11365, October 6, 2010
▪ Cebu Country Club, Inc. vs. Elizagaque, 542 SCRA 65
▪ Buenaventura vs. CA , et. al., GR No.S 127358, 127449, March 31, 2005
▪ Cudia vs. Superintendent of the Philippine Military Academy, G.R. NO.
211362, February 24, 2015

b) Requisites for Recovery of Damages

▪ De Jesus vs. Syquia, 58 Phil. 866


▪ Ledesma vs. CA, GR No. 54598, April 15, 1988
▪ University of the East vs. Jader, GR. No. 132344, Feb. 7. 2000

c) Principle Against Unjust Enrichment

▪ Allied Banking Corp. vs. Lim Sio Wan, 549 SCRA 504
▪ Zosa vs. Estrella, 572 SCRA 428

d) Independent Civil Actions/Rule 111, Rules of Court

e) Prejudicial Questions
i) Definition
ii) Requisites
▪ Alano vs. CA, GR No. 111244, October 15, 1997
▪ Beltran vs. People, G.R. No. 137567, June 20, 2000
▪ Bobis vs. Bobis, G.R. No. 138509, July 31, 2000
▪ Te vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 126746, November 29, 2000
▪ Sabanal vs. Tongco,. et. al., G.R. No. 124498, October 5, 2001
▪ Joselito Pimentel vs. Ma. Chrysantine Pimentel, GR. No. 172060, Sept. 13,
2010

IV. PERSONS & PERSONALITY

a) Juridical Capacity and Capacity to Act


i) Distinctions
ii) Restrictions on Capacity to Act

b) Natural Persons
i) Beginning of Personality
ii) How Civil Personality is Extinguished
▪ Florendo, Jr. vs. Coloma, 129 SCRA 304

iii) Presumptions on Survivorship


▪ Rule 131 Sec. 5 (jj), Rules of Court as Distinguished from Art. 43

c) Juridical Persons
i) Concept
ii) Classification
iii) Dissolution

d) Citizenship
i) Concept
ii) Theories
iii) Citizens of the Philippines under the 1987 Constitution
iv) Naturalization

3
▪ Qualifications
▪ Disqualifications
v) Republic Act No. 9225 “Citizenship Retention and Re-acquisition Act of
2003”

e) Domicile
i) Definition
ii) Distinguished from Residence
▪ Romualdez - Marcos vs. COMELEC, 248 SCRA 313, 64 SCAD 358
▪ Ugdoracion, Jr. vs. Commission on Election, 552 SCRA 231
▪ Limbona vs. Commission on Election, 555 SCRA 391

iii) Absence from One's Domicile, Effect


iv) Domicile of Juridical Persons

Вам также может понравиться