Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
process
Fatma KRIAa, Moez HAMMAMIb, Mounir BACCARc.
a
Computational Fluid Dynamic and Transfer Phenomena, Mechanical Engineering, Tunisia, Sfax,
fatmakria1984@yahoo.fr
b
Computational Fluid Dynamic and Transfer Phenomena, Mechanical Engineering, Tunisia, Sfax,
hammamimoez2003@yahoo.fr
c
Computational Fluid Dynamic and Transfer Phenomena, Mechanical Engineering, Tunisia, Sfax,
mounir.baccar@enis.rnu.tn
Abstract – The purpose of this numerical study is to predict the molding defects and suggest solutions to remedy
these problems. For this purpose, a fine and precise study of heating/cooling cycles of Rapid Heat Cycle Molding
(RHCM) producing LCD panels is undertaken. Heat transfers in mold and cavity are predicted by the commercial
software analysis Fluent 6.3 in cyclic transient regime. It was found that, for the first proposed geometry of the LCD
panel with sharp corners, there is appearance of hot and cold spots. The detected defects affects the quality of the
finished product by causing shrinkage and productivity by slowing the cooling phase.To remedies these problems, a
modification of the shape of the LCD panel is provided. In fact, by rounding inside and outside sharp corners, it was
demonstrated a reduction in the cycle time, the temperature gap and the quantity of consumed energy. Therefore, the
proposed solution improves the quality of the LCD panel and the productivity of the process.
Keywords: Rapid Heat Cycle Molding / Molding defects / Hot spots / Cold spots / Numerical
simulation.
Cycle number
at outer sharp corners causing the appearance of 2 20,55
24,975
cold spots. For the inner sharp corners, cooling is
21,85
slow generating the appearance of hot spots. To 1 26,03
remedy these problems and avoid the appearance of
0 10 20 30
hot spots and cold spots, we must proceed to the Cooling time(s)
rounding of corners.
3 8,04
9,224
3.2 Modified geometry of LCD panel
Cycle number
P2 P1
2 8,13
9,215
3 78,25
90
Cycle number
P2 P1
2 79,13
90,1
1 213,71
211,825
2 4,7 P1
5,33
Figures three and four compare the results obtained
for the two geometrical configurations P1 and P2 of 1 9,46
9,18
the LCD panel.
0 2 4 6 8 10
Temperature gap(°C)
160
Figure 4. Comparison of the two proposed shapes
Temperature (°C)