Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
by
Hope Anne Castro
A thesis
submitted in partial
fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Master of Arts in Psychology
in the College of Science and Mathematics
California State University, Fresno
August 2017
APPROVED
For the Department of Psychology:
We, the undersigned, certify that the thesis of the following student
meets the required standards of scholarship, format, and style of the
university and the student's graduate degree program for the
awarding of the master's degree.
Page
Participants also completed a measure of the Big Five personality traits and a
measure of social desirability assessing self-deceptive enhancement and
impression management (Goldberg, 1992; Goldberg et al., 2006). Further
discussion focuses on an interpretation of the RI factors that have been found, and
on the relationship of infatuation to models of love and their related personality
traits.
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW
(Hatfield, Rapson, & Martel, 2007). The feelings are two-dimensional, in that
people are either elated due to reciprocated interest, or are filled with anxiety and
despair due to unreciprocated interest. The idea of reciprocated interest implies
that RI can involve a level of physical contact between an infatuated person and
the person of interest. Alternatively, companionate or compassionate styles of love
involve feelings of attachment and security, while infatuation lacks both (Hatfield
et al., 2007).
The course and duration of RI differs across individuals (Hatfield et al.,
2007; Obi-Nwosu, 2012; Tennov, 1998). Some individuals experience RI for long
periods of time, even well into an actual romantic relationship. For others, RI is
simply a set of fleeting physiological changes that disappear quickly. A range of
different features and emotions accompanies RI. Intrusive thoughts, persistent
thoughts of the person of interest, and distressing, anxious ruminations are three of
the main experiences of infatuation (Tennov, 1998). People who are severely
affected by the feelings associated with RI tend to switch between these anxious
ruminations and their normal, everyday experiences. The feelings that are
associated with RI can negatively impact a person’s life, and intrusive thoughts
can be all encompassing (Schupak & Rosenthal, 2009). People experiencing these
thoughts report wanting to be around the person of interest at all times, wondering
where and what he or she is doing, wanting to be in physical contact with him or
her, and changing plans to be closer to him or her (Charny, 1981). This passion
and wanting precedes any actual physical contact with the person of interest.
A strong component of RI is sexual desire. People often long for physical
contact with the person at the center of their infatuations. Without an intense
desire to be emotionally connected to another person, these feelings would simply
be defined as a sexual attraction, which is fundamentally different than a desire to
5
be both emotionally and physically bonded with another person (Eastwick &
Finkel, 2008). Sexual attraction is a driving force for the feelings and behaviors
associated with RI. While infatuated, people often fantasize about having sexual
encounters with the individual they are interested in, but sexual attraction is not a
necessary feature of RI. While sexual desire can be an influential component of
some people’s experiences of RI, it is not sufficient to sustain an infatuation of a
person of interest for an extended period of time. These sexual passions, as well as
other non-sexual intense emotions, are not sustainable, and have a tendency to
fade over time.
Infatuation fades over time for a number of reasons, both physiological and
psychological (Hazan & Diamond, 2000). Physiologically, the highly arousing
feelings associated with RI cannot be maintained over an extended period of time.
An alertness and awareness of the person of interest is all that is sustainable
(Tennov, 1998). Heightened awareness allows the infatuated individual to focus
on everything that is being communicated by the person of interest. The important
factors that are communicated are displayed through body language. Because there
is little, if any, physical interaction between an infatuated individual and the
person he or she is infatuated with, it is advantageous for the infatuated individual
to pick up on these subtle cues in body language.
Body language cues that signal when romantic feelings are unreciprocated
include a lack of eye contact, repetitive movements like rubbing the nose,
clenching teeth, and pursing the lips together. An important factor for deciding to
pursue a real relationship with a person of interest, or moving on to someone else,
is to know whether he or she is interested or not. It is possible that RI is dependent
upon the possibility of an actual relationship forming with a person of interest.
One of the quintessential characteristics of RI is that the infatuated individual
6
for over 30 years, concluded that the element of attachment evolved in human
mating systems as a way for people to be able to tolerate their partners long
enough to carry out necessary parental duties. Evolutionarily, the feelings
associated with being romantically infatuated with another individual are enticing
enough to make humans want to seek out romantic relationships, which is
important for successful reproduction. The attachment that accompanies a love
relationship is what differentiates the chaotic feelings and behaviors of RI from a
stable love relationship characterized by attachment.
Agreeableness
Agreeableness is characterized by an individual’s ability to get along well
with others and is concerned with keeping harmony in social situations.
Individuals who score high in agreeableness are characterized as being
trustworthy, unselfish, polite, willing to make compromises, tend to be more
optimistic, and are considerate of the needs of others. People who score lower in
the agreeableness dimension are said to be cynical, uncooperative, and interested
in placing their own needs before those of others.
Conscientiousness
Conscientiousness is characterized by an individual’s ability to direct his or
her impulses, display more self-discipline, and act in a compliant manner.
Individuals who score high in conscientiousness tend to be more organized,
hardworking, industrious, reliable, like to have a plan, and are more efficient.
Individuals who score low on the conscientiousness dimension tend to be
characterized as being careless, impulsive, impractical, and rash.
9
Emotional Stability
Also called neuroticism, this dimension is characterized by instability of
emotions. People who score low in this dimension are said to be emotionally
stable. Neurotic individuals tend to be characterized by irritability, higher levels of
anxiety, are more vulnerable to stress, and tend to be more temperamental and
discontented. Individuals who are stable can be characterized as less emotionally
reactive, more confident, stable, calm, and free of negative thoughts and feelings.
Openness to Experience
Openness to experience is characterized by an individual’s sense of
adventure, curiosity, and imagination. Individuals higher in openness to
experience tend to be marked by higher levels of curiosity, a wider range of and
ability to display emotions, a greater interest in exploring new things, and more
creativity. Individuals who score lower in this dimension are said to be closed to
experience. They are characterized by more cautious behaviors, do not like
change, and prefer things that are familiar to them.
to the domain of behavior being assessed. Higher ratings indicate that the act is
more central to the domain of behavior. Lower ratings indicate that the act is more
peripheral to the domain of behavior. The most highly prototypical acts are
selected for inclusion in the construction of an “Act Report,” a psychometric tool
that can be used to measure a construct.
In phase three of the Act Frequency Approach, participants complete an
Act Report, and are assessed for their relative level of performance of each
behavior. Each participant rates, on a 7-point scale ranging from “1” strongly
disagree to “7” strongly agree, how often he or she personally performs each
behavior. The ratings for each participant on the Act Report are then summed to
produce a total score. A higher total score indicates that the person displays many
of the behaviors associated with the specified domain of behavior. A lower total
score indicates that the person does not display many of the behaviors associated
with the specified domain of behavior. Those who have higher total scores are said
to be more romantically infatuated, and those who have lower total scores are said
to be less romantically infatuated.
Study 1 of RI led to the development of an Act Report consisting of 78 acts
that circumscribe the domain of RI (see Appendix D). While many other measures
assessing RI contain some of the behaviors in this Act Report, these measures
typically include other areas outside the domain of RI (Hatfield et al., 2012). This
new RI Act Report uniquely assesses the primary components of RI by narrowing
the construct to those specific to infatuation. In the present series of studies,
participants completed the RI Act Report while under the influence of a mood
induction procedure. This technique was used to obtain ratings that approximate
how an individual would respond while infatuated with another person.
12
Mood Induction
Mood induction procedures have been used in psychological research to
place participants in a particular mindset (Westermann, Spies, Stahl, & Hesse,
1996). It is believed that an induced mindset, through specific procedures, will
produce more representative end results. Many different techniques and
procedures for inducing moods have been developed and used in psychological
research (Westermann et al., 1996). The techniques that are used in the
preliminary and present study were developed using multiple mood induction
procedures. An original set of mood induction instructions was created that was
believed would most effectively induce a mood of RI.
Mood induction techniques have been found to effectively induce a variety
of moods such as happiness, fear, sadness, and anger. (Mayer, Allen, &
Beauregard, 1995). Mood induction procedures utilize a variety techniques such as
music, vignettes, and imagination (McClanahan, Gold, Lenney, Ryckman, &
Kulberg, 1990; Westermann et al., 1996). In a musical mood induction,
participants are generally asked to listen to a musical piece that is chosen by a
researcher to represent a particular mood (Pignatiello, Camp, & Rasar, 1986).
Musical pieces are rated by a group of experts prior to the study, in order to assess
the mood each piece elicits. Participants generally tend to report sadder feelings
after they listen to a sad piece of music than before they listened to it (Pignatiello
et al., 1986). Other mood induction procedures have utilized vignettes. Participants
were shown some form of film or written material that had been designed to
stimulate their imagination (Westermann et al., 1996). Participants were asked to
involve themselves in whatever situation is presented. These situations are
designed to elicit a mood of the researcher’s choosing.
13
In this research, it was believed that the feelings and behaviors associated
with RI were too complex to fit with any of the already existing methods. The
imagination technique was used, where participants were asked to read a set of
instructions aimed at inducing a mood that was consistent with being romantically
infatuated. The instructions were adapted from research conducted in the area of
sexual jealousy (Buss, Larsen, Westen, & Semmelroth, 1992). Buss et al.
examined sex differences in sexual jealousy. Participants were asked to imagine
their current romantic partner (or a past partner if not currently in a relationship).
They were then asked to imagine that this individual was forming an emotional
connection with another person. In a second condition they were asked to imagine
that this individual was having sexual encounters with another person. They then
reported how upsetting each scenario made them feel. Results indicated that men
tended to experience higher levels of emotions like anger after imagining a partner
having sexual encounters with another individual, and women were more affected
by imagining a partner making an emotional connection with another individual.
This procedure was useful for the creation of the new set of RI mood
induction instructions, because it showed an effective induction of jealousy using
the imagination technique (Buss et al., 1992). Since participants’ moods were
successfully affected by imagining past or fictional romantic experiences, it was
hypothesized that inducing an infatuated state by imagining being romantically
infatuated would be successful also.
CHAPTER 3: STUDY 1: DEVELOPMENT OF THE ACT
REPORT
Introduction
This is the first out of three studies making up this body of work. Study 1
was designed to assess RI as a construct by developing an original measure, as
discussed below. In addition, the relationship between RI and the Big Five
personality dimensions are examined.
Method
Participants
Undergraduate students enrolled in Introductory Psychology courses
(PSYCH 10) at California State University, Fresno were recruited, using an online
system (SONA), to participate in this study. All participants received one class
credit as compensation for their participation in this study. Data were collected
from a sample of convenience consisting of 163 participants through the three
phases of this study. Each participant was only permitted to participate in one of
the three components of this study.
Phase 1: Act nominations. For the first study, 51 participants (18 males, 33
females) received a consent form, and a pencil and paper including a brief
demographics questionnaire and an act nomination form (see Appendices A, B, &
C). The act nomination form is designed to solicit “acts” that represent a domain
of behavior, which in the case of this study is RI (Buss & Craik, 1983). In this
study we asked the participants to nominate at least five acts or behaviors an
individual who is romantically infatuated may perform. Duplicate behaviors,
15
nominations that were not behaviors, and nominations that were otherwise
unsuitable were removed from the final Act Report.
Participants nominated a total of 268 acts through phase one of the current
study. Men nominated a total of 92 behaviors, and women nominated a total of
176 behaviors. The combined 268 acts were input into a spreadsheet, where they
were individually sorted for similarity by category. The categories ranged from
buying him/her gifts, to texting and calling him/her constantly. Once the acts were
sorted for similarity, the duplicates were deleted to account for redundancy. The
sorted list totaled 117 behaviors, and was presented to a new set of participants in
Phase 2.
RI. The collective descriptive data from this phase was then assessed for a clear
break in means by looking to see if the act list, once ordered by descending means,
showed a clear area where participants’ ratings went from prototypical to not
prototypical. The gap between means of 3.67 and 3.63 was chosen as the cut-off
point. Therefore, a total of 78 acts were retained in the final RI Act Report.
Table 1
Results
Correlations for Males, Females, and Total RI Scores with the Big Five
Personality Dimensions and Social Desirability
Variable Total RI Male RI Female RI
Extraversion .21** -.04** .27**
Agreeableness .16** -.05** .23**
Conscientiousness -.05** .19** -.09**
Emotional Stability -.09** .38** -.20**
Openness to Experience .27** .07** .29**
BIDR.SDE -.37** .12** -.46**
BIDR.IM -.42** .38** -.49**
Note. **p < .01, two-tailed. *p < .05, two-tailed, N = 64.
that the instructional mood induction set for the act performance phase of the
study was not working as expected in Phase 3 of this study. These instructions
were adapted from Larson and Buss’ 1992 study on jealousy. Perhaps the mood
induction was not as effective for RI as it was for Buss’s study on sexual jealousy
because negative emotions, such as anger and jealousy, tend to be perceived as
much more salient to individuals than positive emotions.
We believed putting people in a mentally infatuated state would yield
stronger correlations between RI and the Big Five personality dimensions, based
on previous research indicating that the closer a person is to their infatuated
experiences, the more accurate their reports tend to be (Tennov, 1998). It was
unclear if the participants were following the instructions when completing an
online version of the act performance phase of this study. We believed continuing
this method face-to-face in Study 2 would increase the effectiveness of this
component. We expected to find positive correlations between RI and extraversion
and agreeableness, and negative correlations between emotional stability in
women, if trends were to continue. These hypotheses are consistent with theories
from trait research, and research on interpersonal relationships.
Some of the methodological issues faced during this study were in the
initial act collection phase. These issues included participants nominating feelings,
attitudes and states of mind, instead of behaviors, which is one of the criticisms of
using the Act Frequency Approach. By more explicitly defining what a behavior is
in Phase 1, it is possible that more substantial act nominations would have been
obtained. Participants were only given a brief definition of RI before being asked
to think of a time when they or someone they knew was infatuated with another
individual. They were then asked to write down at least five behaviors they
performed while romantically infatuated, or behaviors they believed to be
21
Introduction
Study 2 was an extension of the Act Performance phase of Study 1. The
primary goal of Study 2 was to explore the underlying factor structure of RI using
a modified mood induction technique. It was hypothesized that gathering a larger
sample using a modified mood induction instructional set would produce
significant correlations between the Big Five personality dimensions and the total
RI score.
Method
Participants
Undergraduate students in Introductory Psychology courses (PSYCH 10) at
California State University, Fresno were gathered using an online pool (SONA) to
participate in this study. All participants received one class credit as compensation
in exchange for their participation. This sample of convenience was made up of a
total 291 participants (88 males, 203 females) who completed this online study.
Study 1 proposed that paper and pencil data collection would be ideal for future
assessments, but online data collection was used due to a short amount of time
allotted for access to the participant pool.
Materials
Table 3
The acts within each factor were summed to obtain a score for each of the
eight RI factors. The eight RI factors were then correlated with the Big Five
personality dimensions and a measure of social desirability. Significant
correlations were found between total RI score and openness to experience (r =
.18), agreeableness (r = .17), and emotional stability (r = -.17). See Appendix H
for further significant correlations found between the Big Five personality
dimensions and the eight factors of RI.
Discussion
With RI being defined as the initial feelings and behaviors that precede a
romantic relationship, different dimensions were found and defined within the
current study. A factor analysis was conducted on the RI Act Report items,
revealing eight reliable and interpretable factors of RI. These eight factors
consisted of: General Infatuation, Self-sacrifice, Monopolizing, Insecurity,
Confidence, Irrationality, Obsession, and Closeness. Significant correlations were
found between the total RI score and openness to experience, agreeableness, and
emotional stability.
It was hypothesized, based on the results found in Study1, that the
following significant correlations would be found: openness to experience would
be positively correlated with the total RI score, emotional stability would be
negatively correlated with the total RI score, and agreeableness would be
positively correlated with the total RI score. As stated previously, openness to
experience is characterized by creativity and inventiveness (Caspi, Roberts, &
Shriner, 2005). This could potentially explain the positive relationship between
total RI scores and openness to experience. Ruminative thoughts and fantasies
may require higher levels of creativity and inventiveness. Additionally, total RI
27
scores were negatively correlated with emotional stability. This too makes sense,
intuitively. The more stable people are emotionally, the less likely they may be to
have the ruminative and intrusive thoughts and emotions associated with RI.
Lastly, total RI scores were positively correlated with the agreeableness
dimension. According to previous research, agreeableness is characterized by
thoughtfulness and kindness (Caspi et al., 2005). Kinder people may be less
willing to put themselves out there for a potential romantic partner, thus increasing
their internalization of the feelings of RI.
CHAPTER 5: STUDY 3
Introduction
This final phase of data collection differs from the previous study in its
mood induction procedure, and delivery of the study materials. For Study 3, the
mood induction procedure was modified and delivered as an audio recording.
Additionally, the online surveys were completed in-person in a computer lab for
the first half of the collection of data, and online for the second half of the
collection of data. Additionally, the order in which the instruments were presented
was rearranged to account for bleed over effects potentially caused by the mood
induction procedure. Finally, the Infatuation and Attachment scales was added to
the procedure in order to assess its similarity with the RI Act Report created in
Study 1 (Langeslag et al., 2013). Further discussion of the methodological
modifications follows.
Method
Participants
Two hundred and thirty-one undergraduates (67 males, 163 females, 1
prefer not to state) at California State University, Fresno participated in this study.
Participants were recruited using the online system SONA to make up this sample
of convenience. Participants were primarily single (N = 140) and Hispanic (N =
105), ranging in age from 18-20 years old (N = 193). Each participant received one
class credit as compensation in exchange for their participation.
29
Materials
you would like to have. Try to feel the passionate emotions you would have
had if you were in an intense state of infatuation with this person [pause 3
seconds].
When you have these feelings in your mind, I would like you to close
your eyes, and go into them deeper. Imagine yourself with this person.
Imagine how you would feel [pause 3 seconds] what they would say [pause
3 seconds] what you would do [pause 3 seconds]. These feelings and
images in your mind can be anywhere on the spectrum of emotions: joyful,
uncomfortable, lustful, angry, etc. Please take a moment to really reflect on
a time when you were infatuated with someone [pause 5 seconds].
When you feel as though you have been brought back to a place of
being romantically infatuated, please begin to rate each of the following
behaviors in the context of your feelings.
Data were collected in two phases in Study 3. In the first phase, participants
were directed to meet in a specified computer lab on their scheduled day and time.
The computer lab used in this study accommodated up to 24 students per session.
Once participants had read and signed the consent form, they were instructed via
an overhead projector to turn on their computer monitors and begin completing the
online surveys. Participants first completed the online demographics
questionnaire, Big Five personality inventory, and the Balanced Inventory of
Desirable Responding. They were then prompted by a break in the online survey
to put on a pair of headphones and play the audio file containing the recorded
online RI mood induction instructions, and complete a set of questions assessing
the effectiveness of the procedure. Once the mood induction instructions had been
heard, participants then completed the RI Act Report, and the Infatuation and
Attachment Scales.
31
In the second phase, participants were directed to the online survey via an
anonymous survey link. Individuals who participated in the in person phase of
Study 3 were prevented from completing the online phase of this study.
Participants first completed the online demographics questionnaire, Big Five
personality inventory, and the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. They
were then prompted by a break in the online survey to play the audio file
containing the recorded online RI mood induction instructions, and complete a set
of questions assessing the effectiveness of the procedure. Once the mood induction
instructions had been heard, participants then completed the RI Act Report, and
the Infatuation and Attachment Scales. The change to online data collection was
necessary due to the low rate of recruitment for in-laboratory studies within the
Department of Psychology.
Participants were asked a series of questions to ensure they were in fact
remembering a time when they were infatuated with someone romantically.
Eighty-six percent of the participants reported that they were currently
remembering a time when they were infatuated with someone. The remaining 14%
who reported not remembering a time when they were infatuated, were asked to
take a few moments to think of a serious romantic relationship that they have had
in the past, that they currently have, or that they would like to have. They were
asked to try to feel the passionate emotions they would have had if they were in an
intense state of infatuation with this person. When they felt as though they had
been brought back to a place of being romantically infatuated, they were told to
press “continue” and begin rating the remaining questions in the context of their
feelings. All participants were then asked if their current feelings and emotions of
RI as a result of the mood induction were the same as their memories of those
feelings and emotions. Seventy-one percent reported that the feelings and
32
emotions were the same, and 29% reported that they were not the same. Lastly,
78% reported that the feelings and emotions were positive, and 21% reported that
they were negative. There was no assessment on whether the 14% who did not
remember a time when they were infatuated had ever experienced RI in the past.
Additionally, there was no way for participants to opt out of these mood induction
check questions if they failed to recall a time when they have been romantically
infatuated in the past.
Each participant completed a Big Five inventory, Balanced Inventory of
Desirable Responding, mood induction instructions, RI Act Report, and
Infatuation and Attachment Scales in that order. The reason the mood induction
instructions were administered after the Big Five inventory and Balanced
Inventory of Desirable Responding, and before the RI Act Report and Infatuation
and Attachment Scales was to ensure that the questions pertaining to assessing
level of RI were answered while the participants were in a romantically infatuated
mood. Once the surveys had been completed, the participants received one credit
as compensation for their participation in the study.
It was hypothesized that based on the results found in Study 2, there would
be a highly interpretable eight factor solution of the 78-item RI Act Report. It was
hypothesized that we would find positive correlations between openness to
experience and agreeableness, and the total RI score. It was hypothesized that we
would find negative correlations between emotional stability and the total RI
score. Lastly, it was hypothesized that we would find significant correlations
between the eight factors of RI and the Big Five personality dimensions, matching
in direction with the total RI score.
33
Results
Sample Comparison
As described above, out of necessity due to low participation rates, the
method of data collection switched from in person in a computer lab in phase one,
to online survey data collection in phase two. To assess whether the in person and
online samples were comparable, all of the possible combinations of bivariate
correlations were tested for online versus in-person data collection. Results
showed that there were no significant differences between the two samples, which
justified combining the two samples for the remaining analyses (see Table 5).
Additionally, the in-person and online samples were compared on total RI
score. Results showed that there was no significant difference between the two
groups, t(227) = -.68, p = .50.
Composite scores were calculated for each of the five factors (see Table 7).
These factors were labeled as follows: General Infatuation, Resources, Fumbling,
Obsessive, and Negative Emotions. There were significant inter-correlations
between the factors suggesting that they more than likely occur together when an
individual is experiencing RI (see Table 8).
Table 7
Number of Items, Means, Standard Deviations, and Alpha Reliabilities for the Five
Factors of RI
Component Number of Items Mean SD
General Infatuation 30 161.46 32.76 .97
Resources 19 82.69 24.63 .95
Fumbling 15 57.82 17.01 .87
Obsessive 10 45.14 14.04 .90
Negative Emotions 4 18.32 5.94 .78
Table 8
Partial correlations between the five factors of RI found and the Big Five
personality traits were examined while controlling for social desirability.
38
Discussion
A factor analysis was conducted on the 78-items of RI from the original
Act Report created in Study 1 of this work. A five factor solution was found, with
the five factors named as follows: General Infatuation, Resources, Fumbling,
Obsessive, and Negative Emotions. The structure of the Act Report data showed
that the five factors accounted for a majority of the cumulative variance within the
RI Act Report. In direct contrast to what was hypothesized, there were no
significant correlations between all of the Big Five personality dimensions and this
new measure of RI (the RI Act Report). Instead, only two of the five dimensions
significantly correlated with the total RI score in Study 3 (i.e., agreeableness and
conscientiousness). Regression analyses were conducted, predicting the Big Five
traits, total RI score, General Infatuation, Resources, Fumbling, Obsession, and
Negative Emotions, with self-deceptive enhancement and impression management
removed. Agreeableness and conscientiousness correlated significantly with the
total RI score, General Infatuation, Resources, Fumbling, and Negative Emotions.
Neuroticism negatively correlated with the factor of Negative Emotions.
Although there were fewer correlations of the total RI score with the Big
Five personality dimensions as was originally predicted, a new measure of RI was
created within this program of research as well as a more direct definition of the
39
construct of RI. Additionally, a unique factor structure was found, indicating that
RI is not a unidimensional construct, but is in fact multidimensional.
Because correlations with all five personality dimensions were not found in
the culmination of these three studies, continued exploration of this topic is
advised. Study 3 further revealed that it is possible that personality plays a role in
an individual’s experience of RI. The total RI score on the original RI Act Report
created in Study 1 was significantly correlated with the existing measure of
infatuation from the Infatuation and Attachment Scales. This, along with the
reliability analyses conducted on the scale, leads us to conclude that RI was
explored in greater detail than in previous studies of this construct.
CHAPTER 6: GENERAL DISCUSSION
to the nature of the research question, it was imperative to include all of the proper
instruments to assess personality, social desirability, and RI. The length of this
study combined with the convenience sample could have potentially negatively
impacted the results. Responses were anonymous, which made falsely rating
items, by clicking quickly through the survey, easy to do. Study 3 attempted to
counteract this limitation by conducting the study in-person, but due to the slow
rate of data collection, the remainder of the responses were collected online via an
anonymous survey link. In future studies, the 78-item Act Report could potentially
be reduced to a more manageable number that still adequately addresses the
construct without losing its multidimensionality.
It is also possible that Goldberg’s IPIP scale for assessing the Big Five
personality dimensions is ineffective for assessing RI correlates with personality
traits. The IPIP Five-Factor markers scale was chosen for use within this study due
to its ease of distribution as well as its validity. It is possible that there is another
measure of personality that would be better suited to finding correlations between
the construct of RI and other topics relating to romantic connections.
When considering the limitations of this study, based on the results, further
exploration of this topic is warranted. This study failed to find a direct correlation
between all of the Big Five personality dimensions and RI as it was defined and
measured within this study. It is possible that the original RI Act Report that was
created in Study 1 of this work was not sufficient in defining and circumscribing
the entire domain of RI. For instance, previous definitions and measures of RI
included the element of attachment that was taken out of the current definition and
measure (Langsleg et al., 2012). This new definition and subsequent measure may
have constrained the potential of their trait expression.
47
The results of these three studies support the notion that there is a
relationship between personality traits and RI as it was defined within this body of
work. The behaviors and emotions associated with RI tend to be experienced more
intensely in people who are highly agreeable, less conscientious, and highly open
to experience. Although RI is not correlated significantly with the dimensions of
extraversion and emotional stability, the correlations that were found are important
to note and further add to this topic. But it is possible that RI is not related to
personality at all, and is just a part of human nature.
REFERENCES
REFERENCES
Aloni, M., & Bernieri, F. J. (2004). Is love blind? The effects of experience and
infatuation on the perception of love. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28,
287-296.
Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1974). A little bit about love. Foundations of
Interpersonal Attraction, 379, 355-381.
Buss, D. M. (1994). The strategies of human mating. American Scientist, 82, 238-
249.
Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1983). The act frequency approach to personality.
Psychological Review, 90, 105-126.
Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences
in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science,
3, 251-255.
Fehr, B., & Russell, J. A. (1991). The concept of love viewed from a prototype
perspective. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 60, 425-438.
Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C.,
Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item
pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of
Research in Personality, 40, 84-96.
Hatfield, E., Bensman, L., & Rapson, R. L. (2012). A brief history of social
scientists’ attempts to measure passionate love. Journal of Social and
Personal Relationships, 29, 143-164.
Hatfield, E., Rapson, R. L., & Martel, L. D. (2007). Passionate love and sexual
desire. Handbook of Cultural Psychology, 760-779.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The place of attachment in human mating.
Review of General Psychology, 4, 186-204.
Lasswell, T. E., & Lasswell, M. E. (1976). I love you but I'm not in love with you.
Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 2, 211-224.
Mayer, J. D., Allen, I. P., & Beauregard, K. (1995). Mood inductions for four
specific moods: A procedure employing guided imagery. Journal of Mental
Imagery, 19, 133-150.
51
McClanahan, K. K., Gold, J. A., Lenney, E., Ryckman, R. M., & Kulberg, G. E.
(1990). Infatuation and attraction to a dissimilar other: Why is love blind?
The Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 433-445.
Paunonen, S. V., & Jackson, D. N. (2000). What is beyond the Big Five? Plenty!
Journal of Personality, 68(5), 821-835.
Pignatiello, M. F., Camp, C. J., & Rasar, L. A. (1986). Musical mood induction:
An alternative to the Velten technique. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95,
295-297.
Schupak, C., & Rosenthal, J. (2009). Excessive daydreaming: A case history and
discussion of mind wandering and high fantasy proneness. Consciousness
and Cognition, 18, 290-292.
Tennov, D. (1998). Love and limerence: The experience of being in love. Lanham,
MD: Scarborough House.
Westermann, R., Spies, K., Stahl, G., & Hesse, F. W. (1996). Relative
effectiveness and validity of mood induction procedures: A meta‐analysis.
European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 557-580.
White, J. K., Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (2004). Big five personality
variables and relationship constructs. Personality and Individual Differences,
37, 1519-1530.
If you decide to participate, we the researchers will direct you to an online survey including
demographic questions, Big-Five Personality Inventory, Social Desirability Scale, audio mood
induction instructions, Romantic Infatuation Questionnaire, and Infatuation and Attachment
Scale. The surveys should take approximately 45 minutes to complete.
Due to participating in this study you may experience fatigue or mild boredom. We cannot
guarantee that you will receive any benefits from this study, but everyone who helps with this
work will be contributing directly to our knowledge of the psychology of romantic infatuation.
Any information that is obtained in connection with this study and that can be identified with you
will remain confidential and will be disclosed only with your permission or as required by law. If
you give us your permission by signing this document, we plan to disclose your information only
to the appropriate authorities.
By participating in this study you may receive extra credit for a current class. There are no
additional costs to you for participating in this study.
Your decision whether or not to participate in this study will not prejudice your future relations
with California State University, Fresno the Department of Psychology. If you decide to
participate, you are free to withdraw your consent and to discontinue participation at any time
without penalty. This research is for educational purposes only.
If you have any questions, please ask us. If you have additional questions at a later time, please
contact the following sources:
-Questions regarding the Nature of the Research: Dr. Michael Botwin (559) 278-5099
-Questions regarding the Rights of Research Subjects: The CSUF Committee on the
Protection of Human Subjects (559) 278-2083. You may have a copy of this consent
form to keep.
______________________________
Signature of Investigator
APPENDIX B: DEMOGRAPHIC QUESTIONNAIRE
56
Please complete the following items:
1.) Age____________
2.) Sex: Male______ Female_______
Please circle the response that best represents you.
3.) What is the status of your current romantic relationship?
(A) Single
(B) Dating Cohabiting
(C) Cohabiting / Living with a Partner
(D) Engaged
(E) Married
(F) Divorced
(G) Widowed
4.) What is your race?
(A) African American
(B) Asian
(C) Hispanic
(D) Native American
(E) White
(F) Other
(G) Chose not to state
5.) Approximately, how often do you think of your current romantic
partner? If you do not currently have a romantic partner how often
do you think about your last romantic partner? If you have never had
a romantic partner, how often do you think about a potential
romantic partner?
(A) never
(B) one to ten times a month
(C) one to five times a week
(D) one to five times a day
(E) more than five times a day
6.) Approximately, how many minutes on an “average” day do you
spend thinking about a significant other, or potential partner?
(A) none
(B) one minute to one hour
(C) one hour to two hours
(D) two hours to three hours
(E) three hours to four hours
(F) five hours to six hours
(G) six hours to seven hours
(H) seven hours to eight hours
(I) more than eight hours
APPENDIX C: ACT NOMINATION SURVEY
58
Individuals who are romantically infatuated are usually obsessed with the other
individual. Romantic infatuation can be defined as having intense, even irrational,
romantic feelings for another individual.
Think of a time when either you or someone you know has been romantically infatuated
with another individual. Please write down at least five behaviors that you or someone
you know performed while romantically infatuated, or behaviors you believe to be
associated with the construct of romantic infatuation.
1.______________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________.
2.______________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________.
3.______________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________.
4.______________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________.
5.______________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________.
6.______________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________.
7.______________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________.
8.______________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________.
9.______________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________.
10._____________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________.
APPENDIX D: ROMANTIC INFATUATION ACT REPORT
60
In this study we are exploring romantic infatuation. Please rate each behavior on
the seven-point scale listed below.
Please, think of a time when you were seriously romantically infatuated with
another individual. Imagine the feelings and emotions you had about that person.
When you have these feelings and emotions in your mind, please begin to rate
each of the following behaviors in the context of your feelings of romantic
infatuation.
Describe yourself as you generally are now, not as you wish to be in the future.
Describe yourself as you honestly see yourself, in relation to other people you
know of the same sex as you are, and roughly your same age. So that you can
describe yourself in an honest manner, your responses will be kept in absolute
confidence.
1 2 3 4 . 5 6 7
Not true ….Somewhat true Very true
____ 35. I have done things that I don't tell other people about.
____ 36. I never take things that don't belong to me.
____ 37. I have taken sick-leave from work or school even though I wasn't really
sick.
____ 38. I have never damaged a library book or store merchandise without
reporting it.
____ 39. I have some pretty awful habits.
____ 40. I don't gossip about other people's business.
APPENDIX G: INFATUATION AND ATTACHMENT SCALES
70
Extraversion .004 .021 .030 .016 -.090 .069 -.223** .105 .049
Agreeableness .168** .315** .000 .072 .000 .244** .037 .182** .176**
Conscientiousness -.053 .056 -.139* -.019 -.109 .030 -.054 -.073 -.080
Emotional Stability -.171** -.012 -.243** -.095 -.333** .065 -.184** -.174** -.124*
Openness to Experience .183** .192** .162** .069 .122 .200** .047 .104 .175**
BIDR.SDE -.237** -.075 -.314** -.050 -.358** .017 -.286** -.169** -.207**
BIDR.IM -.207** -.108 -.238** -.081 -.271** -.021 -.176** -.136* -.236**
Note. **p < .01, two-tailed. *p < .05, two-tailed. (1) General Infatuation, (2) Self-sacrifice, (3) Monopolizing, (4) Insecurity, (5) Confidence,
(6) Irrationality, (7) Obsession, (8) Closeness, N = 291.
72
APPENDIX I: STUDY 3 PARTIAL CORRELATIONS
Partial Correlations Between the Big Five Personality Traits, and the Five Factors of RI, Controlling for Social
Desirability
Big Five RI.Total 1 2 3 4 5
74