Department of Biological Function of Food, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Olsztyn,
Poland
ABSTRACT
Background: Hemp seeds are rich in PUFAs and other bioactives that can attenuate the development of obesity-related
disorders; however, the extent to which their lipid fraction is responsible for this effect is unknown.
Objective: We hypothesized that hemp seed or hemp oil supplementation can attenuate genetically determined
disorders and that the former are more effective in doing so.
Methods: Lean and obese male Zucker rats, aged 8 wk, weighing 174 ± 4.2 g and 223 ± 3.8 g, respectively, were
allocated to 4 groups. The lean (LC) and obese controls (OC) were fed a standard diet, whereas the other 2 obese
groups were fed a modified diet in which hemp oil (4% diet; O + HO) or hemp seeds (12% diet; O + HS) were included.
All diets had the same proportions of protein (18%), fat (8%), and fiber (5%) and a similar carbohydrate proportion
(∼52%). Diets fed to O + HO and O + HS had similar fatty acid profiles. After 4 wk, markers of gut and liver function,
antioxidant status, and lipid metabolism were measured.
Results: The total SCFA concentration in the cecal digesta was lower in OC (64.8 ± 4.21 mol/g) compared with LC
(78.1 ± 2.83 mol/g) (P ≤ 0.05), whereas it was greater in O + HS (89 ± 4.41 mol/g) compared with LC, OC, and
O + HO (69.7 ± 2.68 mol/g) (P ≤ 0.05). Plasma total cholesterol was greater in OC (6.20 ± 0.198 mmol/L) and O + HO
(5.60 ± 0.084 mmol/L) compared with LC (2.71 ± 0.094 mmol/L) (P ≤ 0.05); in O + HS, the concentration did not differ
from the other groups (5.16 ± 0.278 mmol/L). The liver cholesterol concentration was greater in OC (1.79 ± 0.379 mg/g)
compared with the other groups (1.28–1.43 mg/g) (P ≤ 0.05). Hepatic expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated
receptor γ was lower in OC (11.9 ± 0.93 units) compared with LC (17.3 ± 1.3 units) (P ≤ 0.05), whereas it was greater
in O + HS (19.2 ± 1.04 units) compared with OC and O + HO (14.0 ± 1.33 units) (P ≤ 0.05).
Conclusions: Dietary hemp seeds more effectively attenuate metabolic disorders in genetically obese rats than the oil
extracted from them, which suggests that the lipid fraction is only partly responsible for these effects. J Nutr 2020;00:1–
9.
Keywords: hemp seeds, hemp seed oil, gut, metabolic disorders, genetic obesity
2 Opyd et al.
TABLE 1 Diet intake, body weight, and body composition of lean and obese Zucker rats fed a diet containing hemp seed oil or hemp
seeds for 4 wk1
Group2
Index LC OC O + HO O + HS ANOVA P value
Initial body weight, g 174 ± 4.2b 224 ± 5.1a 227 ± 8.8a 219 ± 6.6a ≤0.001
Initial body fat, % 16.3 ± 0.54b 47.1 ± 0.58a 47.7 ± 2.33a 46.4 ± 1.25a ≤0.001
Initial body lean, % 77.6 ± 0.59a 45.3 ± 0.54b 45.5 ± 2.80b 46.3 ± 1.17b ≤0.001
± 0.248b ± 0.854a ± 0.580a ± 0.591a ≤0.001
removed, weighed, and frozen using liquid nitrogen or were used for analyzed using Single Tube TaqManVR Gene Expression Assays (Life
further treatment. Technologies). Amplification was performed using a 7900HT Fast Real-
Disaccharidase activity (lactase, maltase, and sucrase) was assayed in Time PCR System. The mRNA expression levels of Pparα, Pparγ , and
jejunal mucosal samples collected using a microscope slide according to Srebp1c were normalized to Actb and multiplied by 10.
the method of Dahlqvist with previously described modifications (22).
The disaccharidase activity was expressed as mol of glucose liberated
Statistical analysis
from disaccharide per min per gram of protein. The mucosal protein
The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM: however, the chemical
content was determined using the Bradford method with BSA as the
composition of hemp seeds and hemp seed oil is expressed as the
standard.
mean ± SD. One-factor ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range post
Samples of fresh ileal, cecal, and colonic digesta were collected, and
hoc test were used to determine significant differences between groups
the pH values were measured using a microelectrode and pH/ION meter
(P ≤ 0.05). If the variance was not homogenous, the Kruskal–Wallis
(model 301, Hanna Instruments). The ammonia concentration in the
1-factor ANOVA by ranks was used followed by Dunn’s post hoc test
fresh cecal digesta was determined in Conway dishes according to the
(P ≤ 0.05). All calculations were performed using STATISTICA version
method described by Hofirek and Haas (23). The SCFA concentration
12 (StatSoft Corp.).
was determined in cecal digesta after storage at −20◦ C using GC (Shi-
madzu Co.) and a capillary column (SGE BP21, 30 m × 0.53 mm; SGE
Europe Ltd.) as previously described (24). Microbial glycolytic activity
in the colonic digesta (α- and β-glucosidase, α- and β-galactosidase,
and β-glucuronidase) was measured spectrophotometrically using the
Results
rate of p- or o-nitrophenol release from nitrophenylglucosides (Sigma- The chemical composition of hemp seeds and hemp seed oil is
Aldrich) according to the method described by Cholewińska et al. (25). shown in Supplementary Table 1. The main component of the
The enzymatic activity (α- and β-glucosidase, α- and β-galactosidase,
seeds was fat, the proportion of which equaled 33.2% DM.
and β-glucuronidase) was expressed as micromoles of product formed
per hour per gram of digesta.
Hemp seeds were also a good source of crude protein and
The glutathione (GSH) and glutathione disulfide (GSSG) content dietary fiber; the proportions of these components were 26.3%
in the liver tissue was determined spectrophotometrically using the and 27.5% DM, respectively. The fatty acid content of the seeds
method of Rahman et al. (26). Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances and oil was similar and expressed as the percentage of total
(TBARS) were determined in the kidney and liver tissue after storage fatty acids. Both hemp seeds and hemp seed oil were rich in
at −20◦ C using a procedure developed by Botsoglou et al. (27). The PUFAs (76.4% and 76.1%, respectively), especially in linoleic
TBARS content was determined spectrophotometrically at 532 nm and acid (52.3% and 52.8%, respectively), α-linolenic acid (18.1%
expressed as micrograms of malondialdehyde per gram of tissue. Liver and 17.5%, respectively), and γ -linolenic acid (4.4% and 4.3%,
lipids were extracted according to the method of Folch et al. (28) respectively). The total content of MUFAs equaled 9.37% and
with previously described modifications (29). The liver cholesterol and
10.0% for the seeds and oil, respectively, including oleate as the
triglyceride concentrations were determined spectrophotometrically in
the extracted lipid phase using reagents from Alpha Diagnostics Ltd.
main MUFA (7.9% and 8.6%, respectively). The overall content
The plasma concentration of cholesterol (total and its HDL and of SFAs in the seeds and oil was 9.34% and 9.02%, respectively,
LDL fractions), triglycerides, urea, uric acid, creatinine and the plasma including palmitate as the main SFA (5.80% and 5.46% of total
activities of aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), fatty acids, respectively). Interestingly, the fatty acid fraction of
and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were determined using an automatic the seeds and oil also contained a small proportion of a trans
biochemical analyzer (Pentra C200, Horiba Ltd.). fatty acid (TFA, cis-9, trans-12-octadecadienoic acid, 0.11%
and 0.12%, respectively).
The effect of dietary supplementation with hemp seeds and
Gene expression analysis in the liver hemp seed oil on rat BW and body composition is shown in
qRT-PCR was performed according to the previously described method
Table 1. The initial BW and body fat percentage were similarly
(29). Briefy, RNA was extracted from the liver using TRI Reagent
solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s higher, whereas the initial body lean percentage was similarly
instructions. β-actin (Actb) was selected as a reference gene. The levels lower in all 3 obese groups compared with the LC group
of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (Pparα), peroxisome (P ≤ 0.05). The initial body fat percentage was almost 3 times
proliferator-activated receptor γ (Pparγ ), sterol regulatory element- lower in the LC group compared with the obese groups, which
binding protein 1c (Srebp1c), and Actb mRNA expression were did not differ from one another. Moreover, the dietary intake
Effects of dietary hemp seeds and hemp seed oil 3
TABLE 2 Physiological indices of the small intestine, cecum, and colon in lean and obese Zucker rats fed a diet containing hemp
seed oil or hemp seeds for 4 wk1
Group2
Index LC OC O + HO O + HS ANOVA P value
Small intestine
Mass with digesta, g/100 g BW 3.13 ± 0.037b 8.68 ± 0.391a 7.29 ± 0.249a 7.15 ± 0.361a,b ≤0.001
pH of digesta 7.06 ± 0.064a 7.06 ± 0.127a 7.02 ± 0.110a 6.57 ± 0.058b <0.01
Mucosal disaccharidase activity, mol · min−1 · g protein−1
calculated on a daily basis was also similarly higher in the obese was comparable among all groups (P > 0.05). Moreover, both
groups compared with the LC group (P ≤ 0.05). As a result, after the endogenous and exogenous intestinal enzymatic activities
4 wk of experimental feeding, obese rats, irrespective of the diet were affected by the rat phenotype and/or dietary factors
type, gained similarly more body weight and >4 times the body (Table 2). As for the endogenous enzymes of the small intestinal
fat mass compared with the LC group (P ≤ 0.05). Interestingly, mucosa, the sucrase activity was similarly increased in all obese
obese rats from the OC and O + HO groups had negative lean groups (compared with the LC group; P ≤ 0.05), whereas
body gain, whereas dietary hemp seeds significantly increased the maltase and lactase activity did not differ among all
body lean gain (compared with the OC group; P ≤ 0.05) but not groups (P > 0.05). In the cecum, the microbial α-galactosidase
to the level of the LC group where it was still >14 times higher. activity was decreased in the OC and O + HO groups
The final body fat percentage was almost 3 times higher whereas (compared with the LC group; P ≤ 0.05), whereas dietary
the final body lean percentage was >2 times lower in the obese hemp seeds increased the activity to the level of the LC group.
groups compared with those in the LC group. Nevertheless, the When compared with the OC group, supplementation with
final body lean percentage was significantly increased in the hemp seeds increased β-glucosidase and β-galactosidase activity
O + HS group compared with the percentage in the OC group (P ≤ 0.05).
(P ≤ 0.05). The concentration, profile, and pool of SCFAs, being the
The effects of hemp seed and hemp seed oil supplementation main microbial fermentation products in the cecum, are shown
on physiological indices of the small intestine, cecum, and colon in Table 3. The total SCFA concentration was decreased in
in rats are shown in Table 2. In the OC and O + HO groups, the OC group compared with the LC group (P ≤ 0.05).
an increase in the mass of the small intestine with digesta Dietary supplementation with hemp seeds caused a significant
calculated per 100 g of BW was observed (compared with (compared with the LC and OC groups; P ≤ 0.05) increase in
the LC group; P ≤ 0.05), whereas hemp seed supplementation the total SCFA concentration. This was mainly a result of the
prevented a significant increase (P ≤ 0.05). The cecum and increased acetate concentration in the O + HS group compared
colon relative tissue masses were decreased in all 3 obese with that in the other groups, which did not differ from one
groups (compared with the LC group; P ≤ 0.05); dietary another, as well as the increased propionate concentration in
hemp seeds significantly increased the cecum tissue mass, but the O + HS group compared with the concentration in the
not to the level of the LC group (P ≤ 0.05). Neither the rat OC and O + HO groups (all at P ≤ 0.05). The acetate,
phenotype nor the experimental factors influenced the relative propionate, and butyrate percentage was comparable among
cecal and colon digesta masses (P = 0.925 and P = 0.095, all groups (P > 0.05). When compared with both control
respectively). However, dietary hemp seed supplementation groups, dietary hemp seeds decreased the SCFA proportion of
decreased the small intestinal and colonic digesta pH compared putrefactive origin (PSCFA; P ≤ 0.05), which was calculated as
with the pH values of the other groups (P ≤ 0.05), which the sum of isobutyrate, isovalerate, and valerate. The SCFA pool
did not differ from one another, but the cecal digesta pH was decreased in the OC group compared with the pool in the
4 Opyd et al.
TABLE 3 SCFA production in the cecal digesta of lean and obese Zucker rats fed a diet containing hemp seed oil or hemp seeds for
4 wk1
Group2
Index LC OC O + HO O + HS ANOVA P value
SCFA concentration, mol/g digesta
Acetate 48.9 ± 2.40b 41.2 ± 3.14b 44.9 ± 2.49b 59.6 ± 4.10a <0.005
Propionate 15.3 ± 0.554a,b 13.3 ± 1.35b 13.7 ± 0.705b 17.6 ± 0.750a <0.05
± ± ± ±
LC group (P ≤ 0.05), and dietary hemp seeds prevented this the other groups; P ≤ 0.05). The antioxidant status of the
decrease (P ≤ 0.05). liver was comparable between the LC, OC, and O + HO
Markers of liver function, the antioxidant status of the liver, groups (P > 0.05). In contrast, the liver TBARS content,
and the plasma and liver markers of lipid metabolism are shown as a marker of lipid peroxidation, was significantly reduced
in Table 4. The relative liver mass was almost 4 times higher by dietary hemp seeds compared with that of the LC group
in the OC and O + HO groups than the LC group, whereas (P ≤ 0.05). Moreover, dietary supplementation with hemp seeds
dietary hemp seeds decreased it to a level comparable with that increased the liver GSH and the sum of reduced and oxidized
of the LC group. The liver fat and triglyceride contents were glutathione (GSH + GSSG) compared with those of the LC
>3 times higher in all obese groups compared with content group (P ≤ 0.05). The plasma ALT, AST, and ALP activities
in the LC group, whereas the liver cholesterol content was were increased in the OC and O + HO groups compared
significantly increased only in the OC group (compared with with activities in the LC group (P ≤ 0.05), and dietary hemp
TABLE 4 Liver and blood plasma markers of lipid metabolism, antioxidant status, and liver function in lean and obese Zucker rats fed
a diet containing hemp seed oil or hemp seeds for 4 wk1
Group2
Marker LC OC O + HO O + HS ANOVA P value
Liver
Mass, g/100 BW 6.88 ± 0.446b 26.7 ± 2.05a 25.9 ± 2.65a 21.8 ± 1.57a,b ≤0.001
Fat, % 6.89 ± 0.629b 24.7 ± 1.63a 26.0 ± 2.02a 22.8 ± 1.53a ≤0.001
Triglycerides, mg/g 5.92 ± 0.565b 27.5 ± 1.51a 28.7 ± 1.53a 26.1 ± 1.90a ≤0.001
Cholesterol, mg/g 1.43 ± 0.093b 1.79 ± 0.379a 1.28 ± 0.142b 1.28 ± 0.118b <0.05
Antioxidant status
TBARS, g/g 539 ± 22.8a 486 ± 25.6a,b 491 ± 15.7a,b 454 ± 10.8b <0.05
GSH, mol/g 5.84 ± 0.226b 6.00 ± 0.180b 6.34 ± 0.280a,b 6.99 ± 0.262a <0.05
GSSG, mol/g 0.363 ± 0.021 0.363 ± 0.015 0.388 ± 0.025 0.403 ± 0.018 NS
GSH + GSSG, mol/g 6.20 ± 0.237b 6.36 ± 0.189b 6.72 ± 0.297a,b 7.39 ± 0.264a <0.05
GSH/GSSG, mol/g 1.64 ± 0.091 1.66 ± 0.059 1.66 ± 0.080 1.76 ± 0.095 NS
Plasma
Enzyme activity, U/L
AST 72.3 ± 5.12b 255 ± 61.4a 216 ± 34.7a 113 ± 15.1a,b ≤0.001
ALT 41.0 ± 1.96b 263 ± 56.2a 149 ± 12.6a 130 ± 18.5a,b ≤0.001
ALP 235.6 ± 10.9b 593 ± 116.0a 718 ± 80.9a 364 ± 23.2a,b ≤0.001
Lipid profile, mmol/L
Total cholesterol 2.71 ± 0.094b 6.20 ± 0.198a 5.60 ± 0.084a 5.16 ± 0.278a,b ≤0.001
HDL cholesterol 0.984 ± 0.028c 2.19 ± 0.099a 1.71 ± 0.053b 1.62 ± 0.065b ≤0.001
Non-HDL cholesterol 1.73 ± 0.076b 4.01 ± 0.120a 3.89 ± 0.086a 3.54 ± 0.250a,b ≤0.001
Triglycerides 2.42 ± 0.322b 5.14 ± 0.692a 3.42 ± 0.679b 4.01 ± 0.372a,b <0.05
1
All values are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 7–8). Values not sharing the same superscript (a, b, c) within a row are different at P ≤ 0.05. BW, body weight; GSH,
glutathione; GSH/GSSG, glutathione to glutathione disulfide ratio; GSSG, glutathione disulfide; NS, nonsignificant, P >0.05; TBARS, thiobarbituric acid-reacting substances.
2
LC, lean control; OC, obese control; O + HO, obese fed a diet containing hemp seed oil; O + HS, obese fed a diet containing hemp seeds.
8 Opyd et al.
37. Ley RE, Bäckhead F, Turnbaug P, Lozupone CA, Knight RD, Gordon 45. Clarke SD. Polyunsaturated fatty acid regulation of gene transcription:
JI. Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA a molecular mechanism to improve the metabolic syndrome. J Nutr
2005;102:11070–5. 2001;131:1129–32.
38. Waldram A, Holmes E, Wang Y, Rantalainem M, Wilson ID, Tuohy KM, 46. Barak Y, Nelson MC, Ong ES, Jones YZ, Ruiz-Lozano P, Chien KR,
McCartney AL, Gibson GR, Nicholson JK. Top-down systems biology Koder A, Evans RM. PPARγ is required for placental, cardiac, and
modeling of host metabotype-microbiome associations in obese rodents. adipose tissue development. Mol Cell 1999;4:585–95.
J Proteome Res 2009;8:2361–75. 47. Wang L, Waltenberger B, Pferschy-Wenzig EM, Blunder M, Liu X,
39. Capuano E. The behavior of dietary fiber in the gastrointestinal Malainer C, Blazevic T, Schwaiger S, Rollinger JM, Heiss EH, et al.
tract determines its physiological effect. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr Natural product agonists of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
2017;57:3543–64. gamma (PPARγ ): a review. Biochem Pharmacol 2014;92:73–89.