Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
HELD AT MBOMBELA
CASE NO:
In the matter between:
STATE
and
BONGIVELI CC Accused 12
and represented in terms of section 332 (1) of act 51 of 1977 by Vusi Willem Magagula)
and represented in terms of section 332 (1) of act 51 of 1977 by Elmon Mdaka)
GENERAL PREAMBLE
3
the offences set out in the charge sheet and are therefore
personally liable.
attributable to ACCUSED NO 4.
attributable to ACCUSED NO 5.
respectively.
3 TOWNSHIP DEVELOPMENT
5
can be approved.
Jr.
The selling price for the farm was an amount of R15 million and
Pam Golding.
NAAUPOORT.
5.2 Although not being the subject of the charges against the
of SINGWANE Attorneys.
settlement.
6.2 This amount was paid by the DHS through SINGWANE Attorneys
7
7
November 2015. The rental amount for the first twelve months
7.3 During the period January 2011 to June 2013 the lessee paid a
January 2012).
date the DHS transferred R37 500 000.00 into the trust account of
SINGWANE Attorneys.
8
8.2 SINGWANE paid LITTLE RIVER R22 500 000.00 and R15 000 000 to P J van
9.1 After DHS had already paid R37 500 000 set out infra departmental BAC
farm NAAUPOORT.
which he presented that the entire amount of R37 500 000.00 was paid
9.3 The amount of R22 500 000.00 LITTLE RIVER received from DHS was
distributed as follows:
9.3.4 R500 000 to SINGWANE Attorneys and a further amount of R82 244.38.
9.3.5 R6 810 000.00 to IMPACT PLUS TRADING 16 CC. Accused 2 and 3 are the
9.3.6 R3 330 788.81 to TROPICAL PARADISE 663 (PTY) LTD. Accused 1 and 3
Part payment of the purchase amount for the BMW X5 was made
through inter alia two payments of R300 000 each made by SINGWANE
Attorneys as follows:
9.5 During March 2011 Accused 9 purchased an AUDI A5 RS5 model valued
Attorneys.
invoice to the DHS for payment of an amount of R207 000 which DHS
SPECIFIC PREAMBLE B.
11. AND WHEREAS BONGIVELI entered into a sale and purchase agreement
with FREMAX Farms for portion 6 of Rietspruit for an amount of R10 500
000. LITTLE RIVER paid R1 500 000 as deposit for the farm and BONGIVELI
2011.
14. When the said sale and purchase agreement was signed BONGIVELI
was not the owner of farm RIETSPRUIT and DUBE did not have approval
at R1 630 000 00 (One million six hundred and thirty thousand rand).
17. In March 2011 the DHS paid an amount R52 884 384.00 to SINGWANE.
19. AND WHEREAS in April 2011 a simultaneous registration of the farm on the
R32 Million.
20. On 19 April 2011 and 05 May 2011 SINGWANE paid R3 644 100.00 and R2
COUNT 1: FRAUD – read with the provisions of section 103 of the criminal
procedure act, act 51 of 1977, as amended (In terms of section 156 of act 51
The accused are guilty of the fraud in that during or about the period April 2008
unlawfully, falsely and with intention to defraud give forth and pretend to
2. All material facts were truthfully disclosed to the officials of the DHS and Van
Tonder.
And did there and then by the means of the said misrepresentation induce
to consider and enter into a sale agreement for the purchase of portion 82 of
4. The purchase price required by PETRUS JOHANNES VAN TONDER for portion
AND WHEREAS payment of the amount of R37,5 million by the DHS for the
its officials
In the event of a conviction either on the main count or the alternative the state
will request that the accused be dealt with in terms of Section 51 (2) (a) of Act
COUNT 2 FRAUD (In terms of section 156 of Act 51 of 1977 against accused 6
only)
The accused is guilty of fraud in that upon or about 28 December 2010 and at
unlawfully, falsely and with intention to defraud give forth and pretend to
purchase price for farm NAAUPOORT was paid over to the seller PETRUS
TONDER.
fide.
And did there and then by the means of the said misrepresentation induce
TONDER.
of the amount of R37 million for purchase of farm NAAUPOORT was not
carried out and that an amount of R22,5 million was paid to LITTLE RIVER.
15
In the event of a conviction the state will request that the accused be dealt
with in terms of Section 51 (2) (a) of Act 105 of 1997 (minimum sentence is 15
years)
COUNT 3: FRAUD (In terms of section 156 of Act 51 of 1977 against Accused 6
only)
The accused is guilty of fraud in that upon or about 28 February 2011 and at or
unlawfully, falsely and with intent to defraud represent to the officials of the
The said amount of R271 913.53 is for services rendered to the DHS, or
IN THAT during or about March 2011 and at or near Mbombela in the Regional
officials.
COUNT 4: FRAUD (In terms of section 156 of act 51 of 1977 against accused 1,
2, 3, 4 and 5 only)
The accused are guilty of fraud in that during or about the period November
2010 and April 2011 at or near Witbank in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga
the accused did unlawfully, falsely and with intention to defraud give forth and
c. The lease agreement between the LITTLE RIVER on one hand and
And did there and then by the means of the aforesaid misrepresentations
enter into a lease agreement with ROBERT BURWISE representing LITTLE RIVER
and pay an amount of R285 000 to LITTLE RIVER and R450 000 to BROAD MARKET
TRADING.
Whereas in truth and in fact the accused when they thus misrepresented
e. LITTLE RIVER is not the owner farm NAAUPOORT or any portion of the said
farm
f. The lease agreement entered into by and between LITTLE RIVER and
g. The accused are not lawfully entitled to receive rental fees from
SCHEDULE 1
12 of 2004 READ WITH SECTIONS 1, 24 AND 26 (1) (II) OF ACT 12 OF 2004 AND
Offering a benefit (In terms of section 156 of Act 51 of 1977 against Accused 1,
2, 3 and 4)
20
form of an amount of R500 000 to any other person, to wit MDUDUZI BLESSING
SINGWANE whether for the benefit of himself or for the benefit of another
obligation, to wit a reward for paying R22,5 million to LITTLE RIVER contrary to
COUNT 35: CORRUPTION IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 3 (a) (i) (aa) and (iv)
the form of an amount of R500 000 from any other person, to wit ROBERT
LITTLE RIVER (PTY) LTD whether for the benefit of himself or for the benefit of
legal obligation, to wit a reward for paying R22,5million to LITTLE RIVER contrary
PREVENTION OF ORGANISED CRIME ACT, ACT 121 OF 1998 (In terms of section
AND WHEREAS the accused knew or ought reasonably to have known that the
Section 4 read with sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act,
an agreement with each other and or any other person and / or engaged in
arrangements or transactions and /or performed acts with the R22,5 million,
interest which anybody might have had in respect thereof and / or;
WHEREAS the amount referred to in count 36 was and / or formed part of the
AND WHEREAS the accused acquired, were in possession of or used the said
amount of money;
NOW THEREFORE the accused are guilty of contravening Section 6 read with
Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998 (Act 121 of
1998);
knowing or having ought reasonably to have known that the R22,5 million or
any part thereof was or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful activities of
another person.
23
WHEREAS the amount referred to in count 36 was and / or formed part of the
AND WHEREAS the accused assisted any person or persons to benefit from the
said amount;
Section 5 read with Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act,
having ought reasonably to have known that the aforesaid amount of money
AND WHEREAS SINGWANE made two separate payments of R300 000 each to
AND WHEREAS the said vehicle is registered on the names of SIPHO JOEL
BONGO (Accused 9)
AND WHEREAS the said vehicle was de facto owned by BONGANI THOMAS
In that upon or about 15th March 2011 and at or near Mbombela in the
form of an amount of R300 000 to any other person, to wit BONGANI THOMAS
BONGO whether for the benefit of himself or for the benefit of another person,
SINGWANE Attorneys.
In that upon or about 25th May 2011 and at or near Mbombela in the Regional
R300 000 to any other person, to wit BONGANI THOMAS BONGO whether for
the benefit of himself or for the benefit of another person, in order to act,
Attorneys.
COUNT 39: CORRUPTION IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 3 (a) (i) (aa) and (iv)
READ WITH SECTIONS 1, 2, 24, 25 and 26 (1) (a) OF THE PREVENTION AND
benefit
In that upon or about 15th March 2011 and at or near Mbombela in the
the form of an amount of R300 000 from any other person, to wit MDUDUZI
BLESSING SINGWANE whether for the benefit of himself or for the benefit of
legal obligation, to wit instructing and exerting pressure on officials of the DHS
COUNT 40: CORRUPTION IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 3 (a) (i) (aa) and (iv)
READ WITH SECTIONS 1, 2, 24, 25 and 26 (1) (a) OF THE PREVENTION AND
benefit (In terms of section 156 of Act 51 of 1977 against Accused 8 only)
In that upon or about 25th May 2011 and at or near Mbombela in the Regional
of R300 000 to any other person, to wit MDUDUZI BLESSING SINGWANE whether
for the benefit of himself or for the benefit of another person, in order to act,
Attorneys.
AND WHEREAS SINGWANE paid R300 000 to AUDI Sandton dealership for the
AND WHEREAS the said vehicle is registered on the names of SIPHO JOEL
BONGO (Accused 9)
AND WHEREAS the said vehicle was de facto owned by BONGANI THOMAS
In that upon or about 14 April 2011 and at or near Mbombela in the Regional
R300 000 to any other person, to wit BONGANI THOMAS BONGO whether for
the benefit of himself or for the benefit of another person, in order to act,
Attorneys.
COUNT 42: CORRUPTION IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 3 (a) (i) (aa) and (iv)
READ WITH SECTIONS 1, 2, 24, 25 and 26 (1) (a) OF ACT 12 OF 2004 – Accepting
a benefit
In that upon or about 14 April 2011 and at or near Mbombela in the Regional
of R300 000 to any other person, to wit MDUDUZI BLESSING SINGWANE whether
for the benefit of himself or for the benefit of another person, in order to act,
Attorneys.
PREVENTION OF ORGANISED CRIME ACT, ACT 121 OF 1998 (In terms of section
WHEREAS the two amounts of R300 000 each paid by SINGWANE on 15 March
2011 and 25 May 2011, respectively, to BMW Northcliff dealership for purchase
AND WHEREAS the accused knew or ought reasonably to have known that the
4 read with sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998
IN THAT upon or about 15 March 2011 and thereafter upon or about 25 May
accused entered into an agreement with each other and or any other person
the two amounts of R300 000 each, which had or were likely to have had the
effect of:-
interest which anybody might have had in respect thereof and / or;
AND WHEREAS the accused acquired, were in possession of or used the said
amount of money;
Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998 (Act 121 of
1998);
30
knowing or having ought reasonably to have known that the two amounts of
R300 000 or any part thereof was or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful
AND WHEREAS the accused assisted any person or persons to benefit from the
said amount;
Section 5 read with Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act,
having ought reasonably to have known that the aforesaid amount of money
PREVENTION OF ORGANISED CRIME ACT, ACT 121 OF 1998 (In terms of section
WHEREAS the amount of R300 000 paid by SINGWANE on 14 April 2011 to AUDI
activities;
AND WHEREAS the accused knew or ought reasonably to have known that the
4 read with sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998
IN THAT upon or about 14 April 2011 and at or near Mbombela in the Regional
performed acts with the amount of R300 000, which had or were likely to have
interest which anybody might have had in respect thereof and / or;
32
WHEREAS the amount referred to in count 45 was and / or formed part of the
AND WHEREAS the accused acquired, were in possession of or used the said
amount of money;
Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998 (Act 121 of
1998);
knowing or having ought reasonably to have known that the amount of R300
000 or any part thereof was or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful
WHEREAS the amount referred to in count 45 was and / or formed part of the
AND WHEREAS the accused assisted any person or persons to benefit from the
said amount;
Section 5 read with Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act,
having ought reasonably to have known that the aforesaid amount of money
WITH SECTIONS 1, 36, 37, 38(1)(a)(iii), 38(1)(b), 38(1)(c)(ii), 38(1) (d), 38(1)(g)
38(1)(n), 38(2), 44(2), 51(1) and 76(4)(c) (AS AMENDED BY THE PUBLIC FINANCE
IN THAT during the period between the 01 March 2010 and the 30th April 2011
in his capacity as the accounting officer of the DHS, did unlawfully, wilfully
1. The duty to ensure that the DHS had and maintained an appropriate
2. The duty to ensure that the DHS had a system for properly evaluating all
PFMA and/or;
7. The duty to take effective and appropriate disciplinary steps against any
PFMA
10. The duty to promptly report his inability to comply with any of his
and/or
11. The duty to not commit the DHS to any liability for which money had not
PREVENTION OF ORGANISED CRIME ACT, ACT 121 OF 1998 (In terms of section
AND WHEREAS the accused held the position of HOD of the DHS.
AND WHEREAS he declared salary paid by DHS as his single source of income.
R718 335.99
AND WHEREAS deposit for the vehicle was inter alia paid for in two cash
deposits of R200 000 each made on 16 May 2011 by a person whose identity
AND WHEREAS the amount of R400 000 constituted or formed part of proceeds
of unlawful activities;
AND WHEREAS the accused knew or ought reasonably to have known that the
4 read with sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998
IN THAT upon or about 16 May 2011 and at or near Mbombela in the Regional
performed acts with the amount of R400 000, which had or were likely to have
interest which anybody might have had in respect thereof and / or;
WHEREAS the amount referred to in count 47 was and / or formed part of the
AND WHEREAS the accused acquired, were in possession of or used the said
amount of money;
Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998 (Act 121 of
1998);
knowing or having ought reasonably to have known that the amount of R400
000 or any part thereof was or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful
WHEREAS the amount referred to in count 47 was and / or formed part of the
AND WHEREAS the accused assisted any person or persons to benefit from the
said amount;
38
Section 5 read with Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act,
ought reasonably to have known that the aforesaid amount of money was or
PREVENTION OF ORGANISED CRIME ACT, ACT 121 OF 1998 (In terms of section
AND WHEREAS accused declared salary paid by DHS as his single source of
income.
289 378.00
AND WHEREAS the accused made a cash payment of R100 000 for the vehicle
on 02 March 2012.
AND WHEREAS the amount of R100 000 constituted or formed part of proceeds
of unlawful activities;
39
AND WHEREAS the accused knew or ought reasonably to have known that the
4 read with sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998
/or performed acts with the amount of R100 000, which had or were likely to
interest which anybody might have had in respect thereof and / or;
WHEREAS the amount referred to in count 48 was and / or formed part of the
AND WHEREAS the accused acquired, was in possession of or used the said
amount of money;
Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998 (Act 121 of
1998);
knowing or having ought reasonably to have known that the amount of R100
000 or any part thereof was or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful
WHEREAS the amount referred to in count 48 was and / or formed part of the
AND WHEREAS the accused assisted any person or persons to benefit from the
said amount;
5 read with Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998
having ought reasonably to have known that the aforesaid amount of money
PREVENTION OF ORGANISED CRIME ACT, ACT 121 OF 1998 (In terms of section
AND WHEREAS accused 7 declared salary paid by DHS as his single source of
income.
590.40
AND WHEREAS the accused made two cash payments of R100 000 each for
AND WHEREAS the amount of R200 000 constituted or formed part of proceeds
of unlawful activities;
AND WHEREAS the accused knew or ought reasonably to have known that the
4 read with sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998
/or performed acts with the two amounts of R100 000 each, which had or were
interest which anybody might have had in respect thereof and / or;
WHEREAS the amount referred to in counts 49 and 50 was and / or formed part
AND WHEREAS the accused acquired, was in possession of or used the said
amount of money;
43
Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998 (Act 121 of
1998);
knowing or having ought reasonably to have known that the amount of R200
000 or any part thereof was or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful
WHEREAS the amount referred to in counts 49 and 50 was and / or formed part
AND WHEREAS the accused assisted any person or persons to benefit from the
said amount;
5 read with Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998
having ought reasonably to have known that the aforesaid amount of money
COUNT 51: FRAUD – READ WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 103 OF ACT 51 OF
1977 (In terms of section 156 of act 51 of 1977 against accused 6, 10, 11 and
12)
The accused are guilty of the fraud in that during or about the period 10 March
Mpumalanga the accused did unlawfully, falsely and with intention to defraud
Mpumalanga that:
2. All material facts for the purchase of the farm by DHS were truthfully
resources.
And did there and then by the means of the said misrepresentation induce
to consider and enter into a sale agreement for the purchase of Rietspruit farm
5. The accused will acquire, in a convoluted manner, fees for the purchase
AND WHEREAS payment of the amount of R32 million by the DHS to SINGWANE
Attorneys for the purchase of farm RIETSPRUIT was made on the strength of
AND WHEREAS the said amount of R32million was the property of the DHS or in
IN THAT during or about the period 17 March 2011 to 11 April 2011 to and at or
In the event of a conviction either on the main count or the alternative the state
will request that the accused be dealt with in terms of Section 51 (2) (a) of Act
AND WHEREAS SINGWANE paid FREEMAX through Werkmans Attorneys R15 661
000.00
AND WHEREAS the accused paid BONGIVELI and its members amounts of
NOW THEREFORE the accused are guilty of the crime of contravening the
provisions of section 3 (b) (ii) (cc) READ WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1, 2,
ACT 12 OF 2004
47
Schedule 2 whether for the benefit of himself or for the benefit of another
Schedule 2
10)
10)
(iv) READ WITH SECTIONS 1, 2, 24, 25 and 26 (1) (a) OF ACT 12 OF 2004 –
Accepting a benefit
(In terms of section 156 of Act 51 of 1977 against Accused 10, 11 and 12 only)
Schedule 2 from any other person, to wit PFUKA AFRIKA whether for the benefit
PREVENTION OF ORGANISED CRIME ACT, ACT 121 OF 1998 (In terms of section
WHEREAS the amount of R3 644 100.00 and R2 092 681.00 paid by SINGWANE
AND WHEREAS the accused knew or ought reasonably to have known that the
Section 4 read with sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act,
IN THAT upon or about 19 April 2011 and on or about 05 May 2011 and at or
into an agreement with each other and or any other person and / or engaged
644 100.00 and R2 092 681.00, which had or were likely to have had the effect
of:-
interest which anybody might have had in respect thereof and / or;
AND WHEREAS the accused acquired, were in possession of or used the said
amount of money;
NOW THEREFORE the accused are guilty of contravening Section 6 read with
Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998 (Act 121 of
1998);
knowing or having ought reasonably to have known that the amount of R3 644
100.00 and R2 092 681.00, respectively, or any part thereof was or formed part
AND WHEREAS the accused assisted any person or persons to benefit from the
said amount;
Section 5 read with Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act,
having ought reasonably to have known that the aforesaid amount of money