Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 51

IN THE COURT FOR THE REGIONAL DIVISION OF MBOMBELA,

HELD AT MBOMBELA

CASE NO:
In the matter between:

STATE

and

ROBERT BURWISE Accused 1

PATRICK DONALD CHIRWA Accused 2

HARRINGTON SIZWAKHENDABA DHLAMINI Accused 3

LITTLE RIVER TRADING 156 (PTY) LTD,

a company duly incorporated in terms of the Companies

Act No 61 of 1973, as represented in terms of Section

332(2) of Act 51 of 1977 by ROBERT BURWISE Accused 4

BROAD MARKET TRADING 204 (PTY) LTD Accused 5

a company duly incorporated in terms of the Companies

Act No 61 of 1973, as represented in terms of Section

332(2) of Act 51 of 1977 by Harrington S Dhlamini

BLESSING MDUDUZI SINGWANE Accused 6


2

DAVID BOY DUBE Accused 7

BONGANI THOMAS BONGO Accused 8

SIPHO JOEL BONGO Accused 9

VUSI WILLEM MAGAGULA Accused 10

BONGANI LOUIS HENRY SIBIYA Accused 11

BONGIVELI CC Accused 12

(a company duly incorporated in terms of the laws of the republic

and represented in terms of section 332 (1) of act 51 of 1977 by Vusi Willem Magagula)

ELMON LAWRENCE MDAKA Accused13

SIBONGILE MERCY MDAKA Accused 14

PFUKA AFRIKA CC Accused 15


(a company duly registered in terms of the laws of the republic

and represented in terms of section 332 (1) of act 51 of 1977 by Elmon Mdaka)

PROVISIONAL CHARGE SHEET FOR BAIL PURPOSE

GENERAL PREAMBLE
3

WHEREAS at times relevant to the charges-

1 LIABILITY OF THE ACCUSED

1.1 All natural accused persons participated in the commission of

the offences set out in the charge sheet and are therefore

personally liable.

1.2 Accused 4 being a corporate body is liable for the commission

of the offences by virtue of the provisions of Section 332 of Act

51 of 1977 in that the acts or omissions of ACCUSED 1, 2 and 3 in

the exercise of their powers or in the performance of their duties

as directors or servants of ACCUSED NO 4, or in furthering or

endeavouring to further the interests of ACCUSED NO 4, are

attributable to ACCUSED NO 4.

1.3 Accused 5 being a corporate body is liable for the commission

of the offences by virtue of the provisions of Section 332 of Act

51 of 1977 in that the acts or omissions of ACCUSED NO 2 and 3

in the exercise of their powers or in the performance of their

duties as directors or servants of ACCUSED NO 5, or in furthering

or endeavouring to further the interests of ACCUSED NO 5, are

attributable to ACCUSED NO 5.

1.4 Accused 12 being a corporate body is liable for the commission

of the offences by virtue of the provisions of Section 332 of Act

51 of 1977 in that the acts or omissions of ACCUSED NO 10 and

11 in the exercise of their powers or in the performance of their


4

duties as directors or servants of ACCUSED NO 12, or in furthering

or endeavouring to further the interests of ACCUSED NO 12, are

attributable to ACCUSED NO 12.

1.5 Accused 15 being a corporate body is liable for the commission

of the offences by virtue of the provisions of Section 332 of Act

51 of 1977 in that the acts or omissions of ACCUSED NO 13 and

14 in the exercise of their powers or in the performance of their

duties as directors or servants of ACCUSED NO 15, or in furthering

or endeavouring to further the interests of ACCUSED NO 15, are

attributable to ACCUSED NO 15.

2 MPUMALANGA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SETTLEMENT [“DHS”]

2.1 Provincial department of human settlement was responsible for

creation of integrated human settlement within the province of

Mpumalanga. Accused 7 and 8 were officials in the

department of human settlement occupying positions as head

of department [“HOD”] and head of legal services,

respectively.

2.2 Acquisition of goods and services by department of human

settlement is regulated. Accused 7, in his official capacity set

out above, entered into contracts for purchase of portion 82

farm NAAUPOORT and RIETSPRUIT.

3 TOWNSHIP DEVELOPMENT
5

3.1 Establishment of a Township is regulated in terms of ordinance

15 of 1986 (Town Planning and Township Ordinance) which set

out procedures that need to be adhered to before a Township

can be approved.

4 PURCHASE OF THE FARM NAAUPOORT

4.1 Owners of portion 82 of farm NAAUPOORT were PETRUS

JOHANNES van TONDER Sr and PETRUS JOHANNES van TONDER

Jr.

4.2 During 2008 Van TONDER Jr appointed Pam Golding, Witbank

as exclusive agents to market the sale of the farm NAAUPOORT.

The selling price for the farm was an amount of R15 million and

Pam Golding was entitled to R1, 5 million as a commission.

Accused 1 was introduced to Van TONDER Jr by a Pam Golding

official as a potential purchaser of the farm.

4.3 Accused 1 offered to purchase farm NAAUPOORT through

Accused 4 for R16, 5 million, inclusive of commission payable to

Pam Golding.

5.1 Accused 1, 2 and 3 are Directors of PACIFIC BREEZE TRADING

474 (PTY) LTD which paid an amount of R2 500 000 to Van


6

TONDER Jr as part payment for the purchase of the farm

NAAUPOORT.

5.2 Although not being the subject of the charges against the

Accused, the flow of funds between DHS, SINGWANE Attorneys

and PACIFIC BREEZE is relevant purposes of setting out the

modus operandi of the Accused.

5.2.2 On 16 July 2010 department of human settlement

paid an amount of R26 590 000 into the trust account

of SINGWANE Attorneys.

5.2.3 On 21 July 2010 SINGWANE paid R4 165 000.00 to

PACIFIC BREEZE. On 25 August 2010 SINGWANE paid

R15 743 491.98 to PACIFIC BREEZE which effectively

received R19 908 491.98 of the R26 590 000.00 paid

to SINGWANE Attorneys by department of human

settlement.

6.1 A tripartite deed of sale agreement for portion 82 farm

NAAUPOORT provides that the purchase price for the farm is

R37, 500 000.

6.2 This amount was paid by the DHS through SINGWANE Attorneys

as set out further hereunder.

7
7

7.1 Accused 1 presented to JOHN MNGUNI and THEMBA

MAHLANGU that he is the new owner of farm NAAUPOORT and

as such and in his capacity as Director of LITTLE RIVER entered

into a lease of business premises agreement with BABUSISEKILE

BUSINESS ENTERPRISE CC represented by JOHN MNGUNI.

7.2 The lease commenced on 01 December 2010 to endure until 30

November 2015. The rental amount for the first twelve months

was R20 000 00 with an escalation rate of 10% for each

succeeding twelve months thereafter.

7.3 During the period January 2011 to June 2013 the lessee paid a

total amount of R735 000.00 as follows:

7.4.1 R285 000.00 to LITTLE TRADING (03 January 2011 to 03

January 2012).

7.4.2 R450 000.00 to BROAD MARKET TRADING (03 February

2012 to 29 June 2013).

8.1 On 23 December 2010 portion 82 of the farm NAAUPOORT was

registered in the name of Emalahleni Local Municipality. On the same

date the DHS transferred R37 500 000.00 into the trust account of

SINGWANE Attorneys.
8

8.2 SINGWANE paid LITTLE RIVER R22 500 000.00 and R15 000 000 to P J van

TONDER Jr. Van TONDER paid Pam Golding R1 500 000.

9.1 After DHS had already paid R37 500 000 set out infra departmental BAC

made a recommendation to DUBE for the purchase of portion 82 of

farm NAAUPOORT.

9.2 SINGWANE submitted an income and expenditure statement to DHS in

which he presented that the entire amount of R37 500 000.00 was paid

over to Van TONDER Jr.

9.3 The amount of R22 500 000.00 LITTLE RIVER received from DHS was

distributed as follows:

9.3.1 R3 775 000 to Accused 2.

9.3.2 R5 143 000.00 to Accused 3.

9.3.3 R1 200 000.00 to SIZWANGENDABA INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD. Accused 2

and Accused 3 are directors of this company.

9.3.4 R500 000 to SINGWANE Attorneys and a further amount of R82 244.38.

9.3.5 R6 810 000.00 to IMPACT PLUS TRADING 16 CC. Accused 2 and 3 are the

only two members of this close corporation.

9.3.6 R3 330 788.81 to TROPICAL PARADISE 663 (PTY) LTD. Accused 1 and 3

were Directors during the relevant period.

9.3.7 An amount of R880 000.00 to Accused 1.


9

9.4 In March 2011 Accused 9 purchased a BMW X5 valued at R1 384 527.50.

Part payment of the purchase amount for the BMW X5 was made

through inter alia two payments of R300 000 each made by SINGWANE

Attorneys as follows:

 R300 000.00 on 15 March 2011

 R300 000.00 on 25 May 2011

9.5 During March 2011 Accused 9 purchased an AUDI A5 RS5 model valued

at R965 769.24. On 14 April 2011 an amount of R300 000.00 was paid as

part payment for the vehicle into the dealership by SINGWANE

Attorneys.

10. AND WHEREAS SINGWANE submitted an invoice to the DHS in which he

claimed an amount of R667 000 for services rendered in the purchase of

farm NAAUPOORT which DHS paid, SINGWANE submitted another

invoice to the DHS for payment of an amount of R207 000 which DHS

paid when there were no further services rendered entitling him to

payment of this last-mentioned amount.

SPECIFIC PREAMBLE B.

11. AND WHEREAS BONGIVELI entered into a sale and purchase agreement

with FREMAX Farms for portion 6 of Rietspruit for an amount of R10 500

000. LITTLE RIVER paid R1 500 000 as deposit for the farm and BONGIVELI

had to deliver a guarantee issued by a bank or financial institution for


10

payment of the balance of the purchase price on or before 31 May

2011.

12. Accused 15 received a commission of R4 500 000 (four million five

hundred thousand rand). Accused 13 and 14 are members of PFUKA

AFRICA BUSINESS CHANNEL CC.

13. In March 2011 BONGIVELI DHS, Msukaligwa Municipality and BONGIVELI

entered into a sale and purchase agreement for farm RIETSPRUIT.

14. When the said sale and purchase agreement was signed BONGIVELI

was not the owner of farm RIETSPRUIT and DUBE did not have approval

of the departmental BAC to purchase the farm.

15. AND WHEREAS municipal valuer for Msukaligwa local municipality

compiled a valuation roll in which portion 6 of farm RIETSPRUIT is valued

at R1 630 000 00 (One million six hundred and thirty thousand rand).

16. AND WHEREAS FREEMAX paid commission to PFUKA AFRICA in the

amount of R450 000. PFUKA AFRICA paid BONGIVELI:-

I. R40 000 on 08 February 2011.

II. R20 000 on 09 February 2011;

III. R50 000 on 18 February 2011;

17. In March 2011 the DHS paid an amount R52 884 384.00 to SINGWANE.

18. SINGWANE furnished FREEMAX with a guarantee of R15 661 018.59.

FREEMAX released documents necessary for transfer of property for

lodgement with the Deeds office, Nelspruit.


11

19. AND WHEREAS in April 2011 a simultaneous registration of the farm on the

name of BONGIVELI and transfer of ownership of the said farm onto

Msugalikwa Municipality was done by SINGWANE Attorneys. BONGIVELI

became the owner of RIETSPRUIT and simultaneously sold it to DHS for

R32 Million.

20. On 19 April 2011 and 05 May 2011 SINGWANE paid R3 644 100.00 and R2

092 681.00, respectively, to LITTLE RIVER.

21. AND WHEREAS PFUKA AFRICA received commission in the amount of R4

680 000.00, it paid members of BONGIVELI CC as follows:-

I. 14 April 2011 accused 11 R290 403.92.

II. 14 April 2011 accused 10 R250 000

III. 14 April 2011accused 11 R250 000

IV. 21 April 2011 accused 10 R519 975.00.

V. 01 June 2011 accused 11 R100 000;

NOW THEREFORE the accused are guilty of the crimes of:

COUNT 1: FRAUD – read with the provisions of section 103 of the criminal

procedure act, act 51 of 1977, as amended (In terms of section 156 of act 51

of 1977 against accused 1, 2, 3 and 4)

The accused are guilty of the fraud in that during or about the period April 2008

to December 2010 and at or near Emalahleni in the district of Emalahleni and

thereafter at or near Mbombela in the district of Mbombela the accused did

unlawfully, falsely and with intention to defraud give forth and pretend to

officials of the department of human settlement, Mpumalanga that:


12

1. Purchase price for portion 82 of farm NAAUPOORT required by the owner

Johan Van Tonder is R37.5 million.

2. All material facts were truthfully disclosed to the officials of the DHS and Van

Tonder.

3. SIZWANGENDABA PROPERTY DEVELOPERS will present a Township ready for

development to the DHS and Emalahleni Local Municipality.

And did there and then by the means of the said misrepresentation induce

Department of Human Settlement and / or its officials to believe the said

misrepresentations and to act thereupon to their prejudice, actual or potential,

to consider and enter into a sale agreement for the purchase of portion 82 of

farm NAAUPOORT and pay an amount of R37,5million, and to the prejudice of

Johan van Tonder, actual or potential.

Whereas the accused at the time when they made aforesaid

misrepresentation well knew that-

4. The purchase price required by PETRUS JOHANNES VAN TONDER for portion

82 of farm NAAUPOORT is R16,5 million.

5. The accused will receive a secret commission of R22,5million if the farm is

purchased by the DHS at an amount of R37,5million.

6. SIZWANGENDABA PROPERTY DEVELOPERS will not present a Township ready

for development to the purchaser.

ALTERNATIVE TO COUNT 1: THEFT


13

AND WHEREAS payment of the amount of R37,5 million by the DHS for the

purchase of farm NAAUPOORT was made on the strength of

misrepresentations made to the officials of the DHS by the accused.

NOW THEREFORE the accused are guilty of theft

IN THAT upon or about the period 20 December 2010 to 28 December 2010

and at or near Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga, the

accused did unlawfully and intentionally appropriate and steal an

amount of R37,5 million or any part thereof the property of or in lawful

possession of the Provincial Department of Human Settlement and / or

its officials

In the event of a conviction either on the main count or the alternative the state

will request that the accused be dealt with in terms of Section 51 (2) (a) of Act

105 of 1997 (minimum sentence is 15 years)

COUNT 2 FRAUD (In terms of section 156 of Act 51 of 1977 against accused 6

only)

The accused is guilty of fraud in that upon or about 28 December 2010 and at

or near Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused did

unlawfully, falsely and with intention to defraud give forth and pretend to

officials of the Department of Human Settlement, Mpumalanga that:

 An amount of R37,5 million paid by the DHS to SINGWANE Attorneys as

purchase price for farm NAAUPOORT was paid over to the seller PETRUS

JOHANNES VAN TONDER.


14

 SINGWANE executed all instructions and specific mandate of the DHS

regarding payment of the amount of R37,5 million to the seller VAN

TONDER.

 A written communication from SINGWANE Attorneys stating that the

amount of R37,5million was paid over to PETRUS JOHANNES VAN TONDER

is true and correct; or

 Written confirmation of payment of R37,5million to VAN TONDER is bona

fide.

And did there and then by the means of the said misrepresentation induce

Department of Human Settlement or its officials or employees to believe the

said misrepresentations and to act thereupon to their prejudice, actual or

potential or to the prejudice or potential prejudice of PETRUS JOHANNES VAN

TONDER.

Whereas the accused at the time when he made aforesaid misrepresentation

well knew that-

 The written confirmation of payment of R37,5million to VAN TONDER is

false and not bona fide.

 The full instructions of the DHS to SINGWANE Attorneys on the payment

of the amount of R37 million for purchase of farm NAAUPOORT was not

carried out and that an amount of R22,5 million was paid to LITTLE RIVER.
15

In the event of a conviction the state will request that the accused be dealt

with in terms of Section 51 (2) (a) of Act 105 of 1997 (minimum sentence is 15

years)

COUNT 3: FRAUD (In terms of section 156 of Act 51 of 1977 against Accused 6

only)

The accused is guilty of fraud in that upon or about 28 February 2011 and at or

near Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused did

unlawfully, falsely and with intent to defraud represent to the officials of the

Provincial Department of Human Settlement, Mpumalanga that:

 An amount of R271 913.53 is legally due and payable, or

 The said amount of R271 913.53 is for services rendered to the DHS, or

 The amount has not previously been claimed and / or paid

And did by means of the said misrepresentation induce Provincial Department

of Human Settlement or its officials or employees to believe the said

misrepresentations and to act thereupon to their prejudice or potential or to

the prejudice or potential prejudice of Department of Human Settlement to

consider to pay and to pay an amount of R271 913.53

Whereas the accused at the time when he made aforesaid misrepresentation

well knew that-


16

 The amount of R271 913.53 is not legally due and payable

 He previously submitted an invoice for fees in the amount of R669 845.20

which was paid by DHS.

ALTERNATIVE TO COUNT 3: THEFT

IN THAT during or about March 2011 and at or near Mbombela in the Regional

Division of Mpumalanga, the accused did unlawfully and intentionally

appropriate and steal an amount of R271, 913.53 the property of or in lawful

possession of the Provincial Department of Human Settlement and / or its

officials.

COUNT 4: FRAUD (In terms of section 156 of act 51 of 1977 against accused 1,

2, 3, 4 and 5 only)

The accused are guilty of fraud in that during or about the period November

2010 and April 2011 at or near Witbank in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga

the accused did unlawfully, falsely and with intention to defraud give forth and

pretend to JOHN MNGUNI and THEMBA MAHLANGU and / or BABUSISEKILE

BUSINESS ENTERPRISE CC and / or its members or employees or its agents that:-

a. LITTLE RIVER is the owner of the portion 82 NAAUPOORT farm; or

b. Accused disclosed all material facts regarding ownership of portion 82

of farm NAAUPOORT to JOHN MNGUNI and THEMBA MAHLANGU.

c. The lease agreement between the LITTLE RIVER on one hand and

BABUSISEKILE BUSINESS ENTERPRISE CC on the other is bona fide.


17

d. The accused are lawfully entitled to receive rental fees from

BABUSISEKILE BUSINESS ENTERPRISE CC or JOHN MNGUNI and THEMBA

MAHLANGU for their occupation of farm NAAUPOORT.

And did there and then by the means of the aforesaid misrepresentations

induce JOHN MNGUNI and THEMBA MAHLANGU to their prejudice, actual or

potential, to accept the aforesaid false misrepresentations as the truth and

enter into a lease agreement with ROBERT BURWISE representing LITTLE RIVER

and pay an amount of R285 000 to LITTLE RIVER and R450 000 to BROAD MARKET

TRADING.

Whereas in truth and in fact the accused when they thus misrepresented

aforesaid, well knew that-

e. LITTLE RIVER is not the owner farm NAAUPOORT or any portion of the said

farm

f. The lease agreement entered into by and between LITTLE RIVER and

BABUSISEKILE BUSINESS ENTERPRISE CC is not bona fide

g. The accused are not lawfully entitled to receive rental fees from

BAUSISEKILE BUSINESS ENTERPRISE CC or JOHN MNGUNI and THEMBA

MAHLANGU for their occupation of farm NAAUPOORT.

COUNTS 5 - 22: THEFT (Against Accused 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 only)

IN THAT upon or about the dates mentioned in Column B to schedule 1 hereto

and at or near eMalahleni in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga the


18

accused did unlawfully and intentionally appropriate and steal amounts of

money mentioned in Column C to schedule 1 hereto the property of or in lawful

possession of JOHN MNGUNI and THEMBA MAHLANGU.

SCHEDULE 1

COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E

Count Date Amount Name of Recipient Bank Account Number

5 03/01/2011 R40 000 LITTLE RIVER SBSA 032469446

6 31/01/2011 R20 000 LITTLE RIVER SBSA 032469446

7 28/02/2011 R20 000 LITTLE RIVER SBSA 032469446

8 28/03/2011 R20 000 LITTLE RIVER SBSA 032469446

9 29/04/2011 R20 000 LITTLE RIVER SBSA 032469446

10 30/05/2011 R20 000 LITTLE RIVER SBSA 032469446

11 30/06/2011 R20 000 LITTLE RIVER SBSA 032469446

12 29/07/2011 R20 000 LITTLE RIVER SBSA 032469446

13 01/09/2011 R20 000 LITTLE RIVER SBSA 032469446

14 29/09/2011 R20 000 LITTLE RIVER SBSA 032469446

15 29/10/2011 R20 000 LITTLE RIVER SBSA 032469446

16 29/11/2011 R20 000 LITTLE RIVER SBSA 032469446

17 03/01/2012 R25 000 LITTLE RIVER SBSA 032469446

18 03/02/2012 R25 000 BROAD MARKET TRADING SBSA 042347998

19 07/03/2012 R25 000 BROAD MARKET TRADING SBSA 042347998


19

20 10/04/2012 R25 000 BROAD MARKET TRADING SBSA 042347998

21 31/05/2012 R25 000 BROAD MARKET TRADING SBSA 042347998

22 29/06/2012 R25 000 BROAD MARKET TRADING SBSA 042347998

23 30/07/2012 R25 000 BROAD MARKET TRADING SBSA 042347998

24 01/09/2012 R25 000 BROAD MARKET TRADING SBSA 042347998

25 01/10/2012 R25 000 BROAD MARKET TRADING SBSA 042347998

26 31/10/2012 R25 000 BROAD MARKET TRADING SBSA 042347998

27 30/11/2012 R25 000 BROAD MARKET TRADING SBSA 042347998

28 24/12/2012 R25 000 BROAD MARKET TRADING SBSA 042347998

29 30/01/2013 R30 000 BROAD MARKET TRADING SBSA 042347998

30 01/03/2013 R30 000 BROAD MARKET TRADING SBSA 042347998

31 30/03/2013 R30 000 BROAD MARKET TRADING SBSA 042347998

32 31/05/2013 R30 000 BROAD MARKET TRADING SBSA 042347998

33 29/06/2013 R30 000 BROAD MARKET TRADING SBSA 042347998

COUNT 34: CORRUPTION IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 3 (b) (ii) (cc) of Act

12 of 2004 READ WITH SECTIONS 1, 24 AND 26 (1) (II) OF ACT 12 OF 2004 AND

READ FURTHER WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 269A OF ACT 51 OF 1977–

Offering a benefit (In terms of section 156 of Act 51 of 1977 against Accused 1,

2, 3 and 4)
20

In that upon or about 02 February 2011 and at or near Mbombela in the

Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused did wrongfully and

intentionally, directly or indirectly give or offered to give gratification in the

form of an amount of R500 000 to any other person, to wit MDUDUZI BLESSING

SINGWANE whether for the benefit of himself or for the benefit of another

person, in order to act, personally or by influencing another person to act in a

manner that amounts to the illegal, dishonest, unauthorised, incomplete, or

biased exercise, carrying out or performance of any powers, duties, or

functions arising out of a constitutional, statutory, contractual or any legal

obligation, to wit a reward for paying R22,5 million to LITTLE RIVER contrary to

the instructions of the DHS.

COUNT 35: CORRUPTION IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 3 (a) (i) (aa) and (iv)

READ WITH SECTIONS 1, 2, 24, 25 and 26 (1) (a) OF PREVENTION AND

COMBATING OF CORRUPT ACTIVITIES ACT 12 OF 2004 – Accepting a benefit (In

terms of section 156 of Act 51 of 1977 against Accused 6 only)

In that upon or about 02 February 2011 and at or near Mbombela in the

Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused did wrongfully and

intentionally, directly or indirectly accept or offered to accept gratification in

the form of an amount of R500 000 from any other person, to wit ROBERT

BURWISE, PATRICK CHIRWA, HARRIGNTON SIZWAKHENDABA DLHAMINI and

LITTLE RIVER (PTY) LTD whether for the benefit of himself or for the benefit of

another person, in order to act, personally or by influencing another person to


21

act in a manner that amounts to the illegal, dishonest, unauthorised,

incomplete, or biased exercise, carrying out or performance of any powers,

duties, or functions arising out of a constitutional, statutory, contractual or any

legal obligation, to wit a reward for paying R22,5million to LITTLE RIVER contrary

to specific instructions of the DHS.

COUNT 36: MONEY LAUNDERING IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 4 OF

PREVENTION OF ORGANISED CRIME ACT, ACT 121 OF 1998 (In terms of section

156 of Act 51 of 1977 against Accused 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 only)

WHEREAS the amount of R22,5 million paid by SINGWANE to LITTLE RIVER

constituted or formed part of proceeds of unlawful activities;

AND WHEREAS the accused knew or ought reasonably to have known that the

said amount was or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful activities;

NOW THEREFORE the accused are guilty of the offence of contravening

Section 4 read with sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act,

1998 (Act 121 of 1998);

IN THAT during or about period 23 to 28 December 2010 and at or near

Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused entered into

an agreement with each other and or any other person and / or engaged in

arrangements or transactions and /or performed acts with the R22,5 million,

which had or were likely to have had the effect of:-


22

 Concealing or disguising the nature, source, location, disposition or

movement of the said amounts of money or ownership thereof or any

interest which anybody might have had in respect thereof and / or;

 Enabling or assisting any person who has committed an offence to avoid

prosecution and/or to remove or diminish the money acquired directly

as a result of the commission of a crime.

FIRST ALTERNATIVE TO COUNT 36: ACQUSITION OR POSSESSION OR USE

PROCEEDS OF UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 6 READ

WITH SECTIONS 1 AND 8 OF ACT 121 OF 1998

WHEREAS the amount referred to in count 36 was and / or formed part of the

proceeds of unlawful activities of another person or persons;

AND WHEREAS the accused acquired, were in possession of or used the said

amount of money;

NOW THEREFORE the accused are guilty of contravening Section 6 read with

Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998 (Act 121 of

1998);

IN THAT upon or about the period mentioned in count 36 and at or near

Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused did

unlawfully acquire, have in possession of or use the aforesaid amount of money

knowing or having ought reasonably to have known that the R22,5 million or

any part thereof was or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful activities of

another person.
23

SECOND ALTERNATIVE TO COUNT 36: ASSISTING ANOTHER TO BENEFIT FROM

PROCEEDS OF UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 5 READ

WITH SECTIONS 1 AND 8 OF ACT NO. 121 OF 1998

WHEREAS the amount referred to in count 36 was and / or formed part of the

proceeds of unlawful activities;

AND WHEREAS the accused assisted any person or persons to benefit from the

said amount;

NOW THEREFORE the accused are guilty of the offence of contravening

Section 5 read with Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act,

1998 (Act 121 of 1998);

IN THAT upon or about the period mentioned in count 36 and at or near

Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused did

unlawfully assist a person or persons whose identity or identities is or are to the

state unknown to benefit from the proceeds of unlawful activities knowing or

having ought reasonably to have known that the aforesaid amount of money

was or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful activities.

COUNT 37: CORRUPTION IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 3 (b) (ii) (cc) READ

WITH SECTIONS 1, 2, 24 AND 26(1) OF ACT 12 of 2004 – Offering a benefit (In

terms of section 156 of Act 51 of 1977 against Accused 6 only)

AND WHEREAS SINGWANE made two separate payments of R300 000 each to

BMW Northcliff Auto dealership for the purchase of a BMW X5 as follows:-

• 15 March 2011 R300 000.00

• 25 May 2011 R300 000.00


24

AND WHEREAS the said vehicle is registered on the names of SIPHO JOEL

BONGO (Accused 9)

AND WHEREAS the said vehicle was de facto owned by BONGANI THOMAS

BONGO (Accused 8).

NOW THEREFORE the accused is guilty of the crime of contravening the

provisions of section 3 (a) of the Act 12 of 2004

In that upon or about 15th March 2011 and at or near Mbombela in the

Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused did wrongfully and

intentionally, directly or indirectly give or offered to give gratification in the

form of an amount of R300 000 to any other person, to wit BONGANI THOMAS

BONGO whether for the benefit of himself or for the benefit of another person,

in order to act, personally or by influencing another person to act in a manner

that amounts to the illegal, dishonest, unauthorised, incomplete, or biased

exercise, carrying out or performance of any powers, duties, or functions arising

out of a constitutional, statutory, contractual or any legal obligation, to wit

instructing and exerting pressure on officials of the DHS to effect payments to

SINGWANE Attorneys.

COUNT 38: CORRUPTION IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 3 (b) (ii) (cc) READ

WITH SECTIONS 1, 2, 24 AND 26 (1) OF ACT 12 OF 2004 – Offering a benefit

(Against accused 6 only in terms of section 156 of Act 51 of 1977)

In that upon or about 25th May 2011 and at or near Mbombela in the Regional

Division of Mpumalanga the accused did wrongfully and intentionally, directly


25

or indirectly give or offered to give gratification in the form of an amount of

R300 000 to any other person, to wit BONGANI THOMAS BONGO whether for

the benefit of himself or for the benefit of another person, in order to act,

personally or by influencing another person to act in a manner that amounts

to the illegal, dishonest, unauthorised, incomplete, or biased exercise, carrying

out or performance of any powers, duties, or functions arising out of a

constitutional, statutory, contractual or any legal obligation, to wit instructing

and exerting pressure on officials of the DHS to effect payments to SINGWANE

Attorneys.

COUNT 39: CORRUPTION IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 3 (a) (i) (aa) and (iv)

READ WITH SECTIONS 1, 2, 24, 25 and 26 (1) (a) OF THE PREVENTION AND

COMBATING OF CORRUPT ACTIVITIES ACT, ACT 12 OF 2004 – Accepting a

benefit

In that upon or about 15th March 2011 and at or near Mbombela in the

Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused did wrongfully and

intentionally, directly or indirectly accept or offered to accept gratification in

the form of an amount of R300 000 from any other person, to wit MDUDUZI

BLESSING SINGWANE whether for the benefit of himself or for the benefit of

another person, in order to act, personally or by influencing another person to

act in a manner that amounts to the illegal, dishonest, unauthorised,

incomplete, or biased exercise, carrying out or performance of any powers,

duties, or functions arising out of a constitutional, statutory, contractual or any


26

legal obligation, to wit instructing and exerting pressure on officials of the DHS

to effect payments to SINGWANE Attorneys.

COUNT 40: CORRUPTION IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 3 (a) (i) (aa) and (iv)

READ WITH SECTIONS 1, 2, 24, 25 and 26 (1) (a) OF THE PREVENTION AND

COMBATING OF CORRUPT ACTIVITIES ACT, ACT 12 OF 2004 – Accepting a

benefit (In terms of section 156 of Act 51 of 1977 against Accused 8 only)

In that upon or about 25th May 2011 and at or near Mbombela in the Regional

Division of Mpumalanga the accused did wrongfully and intentionally, directly

or indirectly accept or offered to accept gratification in the form of an amount

of R300 000 to any other person, to wit MDUDUZI BLESSING SINGWANE whether

for the benefit of himself or for the benefit of another person, in order to act,

personally or by influencing another person to act in a manner that amounts

to the illegal, dishonest, unauthorised, incomplete, or biased exercise, carrying

out or performance of any powers, duties, or functions arising out of a

constitutional, statutory, contractual or any legal obligation, to wit instructing

and exerting pressure on officials of the DHS to effect payments to SINGWANE

Attorneys.

COUNT 41: CORRUPTION IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 3 (b) (ii) (cc) READ

WITH SECTIONS 1, 2, 24 AND 26(1) OF ACT 12 OF 2004 – Offering a benefit (In

terms of section 156 of Act 51 of 1977 against Accused 6 only)

AND WHEREAS SINGWANE paid R300 000 to AUDI Sandton dealership for the

purchase of an AUDI A5 RS5 vehicle


27

AND WHEREAS the said vehicle is registered on the names of SIPHO JOEL

BONGO (Accused 9)

AND WHEREAS the said vehicle was de facto owned by BONGANI THOMAS

BONGO (Accused 8).

NOW THEREFORE the accused is guilty of the crime of contravening the

provisions of section 3 (a) of the Act 12 of 2004

In that upon or about 14 April 2011 and at or near Mbombela in the Regional

Division of Mpumalanga the accused did wrongfully and intentionally, directly

or indirectly give or offered to give gratification in the form of an amount of

R300 000 to any other person, to wit BONGANI THOMAS BONGO whether for

the benefit of himself or for the benefit of another person, in order to act,

personally or by influencing another person to act in a manner that amounts

to the illegal, dishonest, unauthorised, incomplete, or biased exercise, carrying

out or performance of any powers, duties, or functions arising out of a

constitutional, statutory, contractual or any legal obligation, to wit instructing

and exerting pressure on officials of the DHS to effect payments to SINGWANE

Attorneys.

COUNT 42: CORRUPTION IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 3 (a) (i) (aa) and (iv)

READ WITH SECTIONS 1, 2, 24, 25 and 26 (1) (a) OF ACT 12 OF 2004 – Accepting

a benefit

(In terms of section 156 of Act 51 of 1977 against Accused 8 only)

In that upon or about 14 April 2011 and at or near Mbombela in the Regional

Division of Mpumalanga the accused did wrongfully and intentionally, directly


28

or indirectly accept or offered to accept gratification in the form of an amount

of R300 000 to any other person, to wit MDUDUZI BLESSING SINGWANE whether

for the benefit of himself or for the benefit of another person, in order to act,

personally or by influencing another person to act in a manner that amounts

to the illegal, dishonest, unauthorised, incomplete, or biased exercise, carrying

out or performance of any powers, duties, or functions arising out of a

constitutional, statutory, contractual or any legal obligation, to wit instructing

and exerting pressure on officials of the DHS to effect payments to SINGWANE

Attorneys.

COUNTS 43 – 44: MONEY LAUNDERING IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 4 OF

PREVENTION OF ORGANISED CRIME ACT, ACT 121 OF 1998 (In terms of section

156 of Act 51 of 1977 against Accused 9 only)

WHEREAS the two amounts of R300 000 each paid by SINGWANE on 15 March

2011 and 25 May 2011, respectively, to BMW Northcliff dealership for purchase

of a motor vehicle registered on the names of SIPHO JOEL BONGO constituted

or formed part of proceeds of unlawful activities;

AND WHEREAS the accused knew or ought reasonably to have known that the

said amounts were or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful activities;

NOW THEREFORE the accused is guilty of the offence of contravening Section

4 read with sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998

(Act 121 of 1998);


29

IN THAT upon or about 15 March 2011 and thereafter upon or about 25 May

2011 and at or near Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga the

accused entered into an agreement with each other and or any other person

and / or engaged in arrangements or transactions and /or performed acts with

the two amounts of R300 000 each, which had or were likely to have had the

effect of:-

• Concealing or disguising the nature, source, location, disposition or

movement of the said amounts of money or ownership thereof or any

interest which anybody might have had in respect thereof and / or;

• Enabling or assisting any person who has committed an offence to avoid

prosecution and/or to remove or diminish the money acquired directly

as a result of the commission of a crime.

FIRST ALTERNATIVE TO COUNTS 43 – 44: ACQUSITION OR POSSESSION OR USE

PROCEEDS OF UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 6 READ

WITH SECTIONS 1 AND 8 OF ACT 121 OF 1998

WHEREAS the amounts referred to in counts 43 – 44 were and / or formed part

of the proceeds of unlawful activities of another person or persons;

AND WHEREAS the accused acquired, were in possession of or used the said

amount of money;

NOW THEREFORE the accused is guilty of contravening Section 6 read with

Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998 (Act 121 of

1998);
30

IN THAT upon or about the period mentioned in counts 43 – 44 and at or near

Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused did

unlawfully acquire, have in possession of or use the aforesaid amount of money

knowing or having ought reasonably to have known that the two amounts of

R300 000 or any part thereof was or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful

activities of another person.

SECOND ALTERNATIVE TO COUNTS 43 – 44: ASSISTING ANOTHER TO BENEFIT

FROM PROCEEDS OF UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 5

READ WITH SECTIONS 1 AND 8 OF ACT NO. 121 OF 1998

WHEREAS the amounts referred to in counts 43 and 44 was and / or formed

part of the proceeds of unlawful activities;

AND WHEREAS the accused assisted any person or persons to benefit from the

said amount;

NOW THEREFORE the accused are guilty of the offence of contravening

Section 5 read with Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act,

1998 (Act 121 of 1998);

IN THAT upon or about the period mentioned in counts 43 – 44 and at or near

Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused did

unlawfully assist a person or persons whose identity or identities is or are to the

state unknown to benefit from the proceeds of unlawful activities knowing or

having ought reasonably to have known that the aforesaid amount of money

was or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful activities.


31

COUNT 45: MONEY LAUNDERING IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 4 OF

PREVENTION OF ORGANISED CRIME ACT, ACT 121 OF 1998 (In terms of section

156 of Act 51 of 1977 against Accused 9 only)

WHEREAS the amount of R300 000 paid by SINGWANE on 14 April 2011 to AUDI

Sandton dealership for purchase of a motor vehicle registered on the names

of SIPHO JOEL BONGO constituted or formed part of proceeds of unlawful

activities;

AND WHEREAS the accused knew or ought reasonably to have known that the

said amount was or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful activities;

NOW THEREFORE the accused is guilty of the offence of contravening Section

4 read with sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998

(Act 121 of 1998);

IN THAT upon or about 14 April 2011 and at or near Mbombela in the Regional

Division of Mpumalanga the accused entered into an agreement with any

other person and / or engaged in arrangements or transactions and /or

performed acts with the amount of R300 000, which had or were likely to have

had the effect of:-

• Concealing or disguising the nature, source, location, disposition or

movement of the said amounts of money or ownership thereof or any

interest which anybody might have had in respect thereof and / or;
32

• Enabling or assisting any person who has committed an offence to avoid

prosecution and/or to remove or diminish the money acquired directly

as a result of the commission of a crime.

FIRST ALTERNATIVE TO COUNT 45: ACQUSITION OR POSSESSION OR USE

PROCEEDS OF UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 6 READ

WITH SECTIONS 1 AND 8 OF ACT 121 OF 1998

WHEREAS the amount referred to in count 45 was and / or formed part of the

proceeds of unlawful activities of another person or persons;

AND WHEREAS the accused acquired, were in possession of or used the said

amount of money;

NOW THEREFORE the accused is guilty of contravening Section 6 read with

Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998 (Act 121 of

1998);

IN THAT upon or about the period mentioned in count 45 and at or near

Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused did

unlawfully acquire, have in possession of or use the aforesaid amount of money

knowing or having ought reasonably to have known that the amount of R300

000 or any part thereof was or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful

activities of another person.


33

SECOND ALTERNATIVE TO COUNT 45: ASSISTING ANOTHER TO BENEFIT FROM

PROCEEDS OF UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 5 READ

WITH SECTIONS 1 AND 8 OF ACT NO. 121 OF 1998

WHEREAS the amount referred to in count 45 was and / or formed part of the

proceeds of unlawful activities;

AND WHEREAS the accused assisted any person or persons to benefit from the

said amount;

NOW THEREFORE the accused are guilty of the offence of contravening

Section 5 read with Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act,

1998 (Act 121 of 1998);

IN THAT upon or about the period mentioned in count 45 and at or near

Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused did

unlawfully assist a person or persons whose identity or identities is or are to the

state unknown to benefit from the proceeds of unlawful activities knowing or

having ought reasonably to have known that the aforesaid amount of money

was or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful activities.

COUNT 46: THAT ACCUSED 7 IS GUILTY OF CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 86(1)

OF THE PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT ACT, 1999 (ACT NO 1 OF 1999) READ

WITH SECTIONS 1, 36, 37, 38(1)(a)(iii), 38(1)(b), 38(1)(c)(ii), 38(1) (d), 38(1)(g)

38(1)(n), 38(2), 44(2), 51(1) and 76(4)(c) (AS AMENDED BY THE PUBLIC FINANCE

MANAGEMENT AMENDMENT ACT, 199 (ACT NO 29 OF 1999) AND FURTHER READ

WITH SECTION 217(1) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA.


34

IN THAT during the period between the 01 March 2010 and the 30th April 2011

and at or near Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga Accused 7

in his capacity as the accounting officer of the DHS, did unlawfully, wilfully

and/or in a grossly negligent manner fail to comply with a provision of the

Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act No 1 of 1999) to wit:

1. The duty to ensure that the DHS had and maintained an appropriate

procurement and provisioning system which was fair, equitable,

transparent, competitive and cost-effective as prescribed by section

38(1)(a)(iii) of the PFMA and/or;

2. The duty to ensure that the DHS had a system for properly evaluating all

major capital projects prior to a final decision on the project and/or as

prescribed by section 38(1) (a) (iv) of the PFMA and/or;

3. The duty to ensure the effective, efficient, economical and transparent

use of the resources of the DHS as prescribed by section (38(1)(b) of the

PFMA and/or;

4. The duty to take effective and appropriate steps to prevent

unauthorised, irregular and/or fruitless and wasteful expenditure and

losses resulting from criminal conduct as prescribed by section

38(1)(c)(ii)) of the PFMA and/or;

5. The duty to manage contractual liabilities of the DHS as prescribed by

section 38(1) (d) of the PFMA and/or;

6. The duty to report the irregular expenditure incurred by DHS

Mpumalanga as prescribed by section 38(1) (g) of the PFMA and/or;


35

7. The duty to take effective and appropriate disciplinary steps against any

official in the service of the DHS Mpumalanga as prescribed by section

38(1)) (h) (i) – (iii) and/or;

9. The duty to comply, and to ensure compliance by the DHS Mpumalanga

with the provisions of the PFMA as prescribed by section 38(1)(n) of the

PFMA

10. The duty to promptly report his inability to comply with any of his

responsibilities determined for accounting officers in Part 1 of the Public

Finance Management Act as prescribed by section 40(5) of the PFMA

and/or

11. The duty to not commit the DHS to any liability for which money had not

been appropriated as prescribed by section 38(2) of the PFMA.

COUNT 47: MONEY LAUNDERING IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 4 OF

PREVENTION OF ORGANISED CRIME ACT, ACT 121 OF 1998 (In terms of section

156 of Act 51 of 1977 against Accused 7 only)

AND WHEREAS the accused held the position of HOD of the DHS.

AND WHEREAS he declared salary paid by DHS as his single source of income.

AND WHEREAS accused purchased a Mercedes Benz motor vehicle valued at

R718 335.99

AND WHEREAS deposit for the vehicle was inter alia paid for in two cash

deposits of R200 000 each made on 16 May 2011 by a person whose identity

was withheld and only reflected as “Shoes”.


36

AND WHEREAS the amount of R400 000 constituted or formed part of proceeds

of unlawful activities;

AND WHEREAS the accused knew or ought reasonably to have known that the

said amounts were or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful activities;

NOW THEREFORE the accused is guilty of the offence of contravening Section

4 read with sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998

(Act 121 of 1998);

IN THAT upon or about 16 May 2011 and at or near Mbombela in the Regional

Division of Mpumalanga the accused entered into an agreement with any

other person and / or engaged in arrangements or transactions and /or

performed acts with the amount of R400 000, which had or were likely to have

had the effect of:-

• Concealing or disguising the nature, source, location, disposition or

movement of the said amounts of money or ownership thereof or any

interest which anybody might have had in respect thereof and / or;

• Enabling or assisting any person who has committed an offence to avoid

prosecution and/or to remove or diminish the money acquired directly

as a result of the commission of a crime.

FIRST ALTERNATIVE TO COUNT 47: ACQUSITION OR POSSESSION OR USE

PROCEEDS OF UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 6 READ

WITH SECTIONS 1 AND 8 OF ACT 121 OF 1998


37

WHEREAS the amount referred to in count 47 was and / or formed part of the

proceeds of unlawful activities of another person or persons;

AND WHEREAS the accused acquired, were in possession of or used the said

amount of money;

NOW THEREFORE the accused is guilty of contravening Section 6 read with

Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998 (Act 121 of

1998);

IN THAT upon or about the period mentioned in counts 47 and at or near

Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused did

unlawfully acquire, have in possession of or use the aforesaid amount of money

knowing or having ought reasonably to have known that the amount of R400

000 or any part thereof was or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful

activities of another person.

SECOND ALTERNATIVE TO COUNT 47: ASSISTING ANOTHER TO BENEFIT FROM

PROCEEDS OF UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 5 READ

WITH SECTIONS 1 AND 8 OF ACT NO. 121 OF 1998

WHEREAS the amount referred to in count 47 was and / or formed part of the

proceeds of unlawful activities;

AND WHEREAS the accused assisted any person or persons to benefit from the

said amount;
38

NOW THEREFORE the accused are guilty of the offence of contravening

Section 5 read with Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act,

1998 (Act 121 of 1998);

IN THAT upon or about the period mentioned in count 47 and at or near

Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused did

unlawfully assist a person or persons whose identity or identities is to the state

unknown, to benefit from the proceeds of unlawful activities knowing or having

ought reasonably to have known that the aforesaid amount of money was or

formed part of the proceeds of unlawful activities.

COUNT 48: MONEY LAUNDERING IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 4 OF

PREVENTION OF ORGANISED CRIME ACT, ACT 121 OF 1998 (In terms of section

156 of Act 51 of 1977 against Accused 7 only)

AND WHEREAS accused declared salary paid by DHS as his single source of

income.

AND WHEREAS he purchased a Mercedes Benz E63 motor vehicle valued at R1

289 378.00

AND WHEREAS the accused made a cash payment of R100 000 for the vehicle

on 02 March 2012.

AND WHEREAS the amount of R100 000 constituted or formed part of proceeds

of unlawful activities;
39

AND WHEREAS the accused knew or ought reasonably to have known that the

said amount was or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful activities;

NOW THEREFORE the accused is guilty of the offence of contravening Section

4 read with sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998

(Act 121 of 1998);

IN THAT upon or about 02 March 2012 and at or near Mbombela in the

Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused entered into an agreement

with any other person and / or engaged in arrangements or transactions and

/or performed acts with the amount of R100 000, which had or were likely to

have had the effect of:-

• Concealing or disguising the nature, source, location, disposition or

movement of the said amounts of money or ownership thereof or any

interest which anybody might have had in respect thereof and / or;

• Enabling or assisting any person who has committed an offence to avoid

prosecution and/or to remove or diminish the money acquired directly

as a result of the commission of a crime.

FIRST ALTERNATIVE TO COUNT 48: ACQUSITION OR POSSESSION OR USE

PROCEEDS OF UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 6 READ

WITH SECTIONS 1 AND 8 OF ACT 121 OF 1998

WHEREAS the amount referred to in count 48 was and / or formed part of the

proceeds of unlawful activities of another person or persons;


40

AND WHEREAS the accused acquired, was in possession of or used the said

amount of money;

NOW THEREFORE the accused is guilty of contravening Section 6 read with

Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998 (Act 121 of

1998);

IN THAT upon or about the period mentioned in count 48 and at or near

Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused did

unlawfully acquire, have in possession of or use the aforesaid amount of money

knowing or having ought reasonably to have known that the amount of R100

000 or any part thereof was or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful

activities of another person.

SECOND ALTERNATIVE TO COUNT 48: ASSISTING ANOTHER TO BENEFIT FROM

PROCEEDS OF UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 5 READ

WITH SECTIONS 1 AND 8 OF ACT NO. 121 OF 1998

WHEREAS the amount referred to in count 48 was and / or formed part of the

proceeds of unlawful activities;

AND WHEREAS the accused assisted any person or persons to benefit from the

said amount;

NOW THEREFORE the accused is guilty of the offence of contravening Section

5 read with Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998

(Act 121 of 1998);


41

IN THAT upon or about the period mentioned in count 48 and at or near

Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused did

unlawfully assist a person or persons whose identity or identities is or are to the

state unknown to benefit from the proceeds of unlawful activities knowing or

having ought reasonably to have known that the aforesaid amount of money

was or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful activities.

COUNTS 49 – 50: MONEY LAUNDERING IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 4 OF

PREVENTION OF ORGANISED CRIME ACT, ACT 121 OF 1998 (In terms of section

156 of Act 51 of 1977 against Accused 7 only)

AND WHEREAS accused 7 declared salary paid by DHS as his single source of

income.

AND WHEREAS he purchased a Lexus, LX570 motor vehicle valued at R1 182

590.40

AND WHEREAS the accused made two cash payments of R100 000 each for

the vehicle on 30 July 2012 and 31 July 2012, respectively.

AND WHEREAS the amount of R200 000 constituted or formed part of proceeds

of unlawful activities;

AND WHEREAS the accused knew or ought reasonably to have known that the

said amount was or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful activities;


42

NOW THEREFORE the accused is guilty of the offence of contravening Section

4 read with sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998

(Act 121 of 1998);

IN THAT upon or about 30 – 31 July 2012 and at or near Mbombela in the

Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused entered into an agreement

with any other person and / or engaged in arrangements or transactions and

/or performed acts with the two amounts of R100 000 each, which had or were

likely to have had the effect of:-

• Concealing or disguising the nature, source, location, disposition or

movement of the said amounts of money or ownership thereof or any

interest which anybody might have had in respect thereof and / or;

• Enabling or assisting any person who has committed an offence to avoid

prosecution and/or to remove or diminish the money acquired directly

as a result of the commission of a crime.

FIRST ALTERNATIVE TO COUNTS 49 – 50: ACQUSITION OR POSSESSION OR USE

PROCEEDS OF UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 6 READ

WITH SECTIONS 1 AND 8 OF ACT 121 OF 1998

WHEREAS the amount referred to in counts 49 and 50 was and / or formed part

of the proceeds of unlawful activities of another person or persons;

AND WHEREAS the accused acquired, was in possession of or used the said

amount of money;
43

NOW THEREFORE the accused is guilty of contravening Section 6 read with

Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998 (Act 121 of

1998);

IN THAT upon or about the period mentioned in counts 49 and 50 and at or

near Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused did

unlawfully acquire, have in possession of or use the aforesaid amount of money

knowing or having ought reasonably to have known that the amount of R200

000 or any part thereof was or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful

activities of another person.

SECOND ALTERNATIVE TO COUNTS 49 – 50: ASSISTING ANOTHER TO BENEFIT

FROM PROCEEDS OF UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 5

READ WITH SECTIONS 1 AND 8 OF ACT NO. 121 OF 1998

WHEREAS the amount referred to in counts 49 and 50 was and / or formed part

of the proceeds of unlawful activities;

AND WHEREAS the accused assisted any person or persons to benefit from the

said amount;

NOW THEREFORE the accused is guilty of the offence of contravening Section

5 read with Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998

(Act 121 of 1998);


44

IN THAT upon or about the period mentioned in counts 49 and 50 and at or

near Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused did

unlawfully assist a person or persons whose identity or identities is or are to the

state unknown to benefit from the proceeds of unlawful activities knowing or

having ought reasonably to have known that the aforesaid amount of money

was or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful activities.

COUNT 51: FRAUD – READ WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 103 OF ACT 51 OF

1977 (In terms of section 156 of act 51 of 1977 against accused 6, 10, 11 and

12)

The accused are guilty of the fraud in that during or about the period 10 March

2011 to 11 April 2011 and at or near Ermelo in the Regional Division of

Mpumalanga and thereafter at or near Mbombela in the Regional Division of

Mpumalanga the accused did unlawfully, falsely and with intention to defraud

give forth and pretend to officials of the department of human settlement,

Mpumalanga that:

1. BONGIVELI own farm Rietspruit; and/ or,

2. All material facts for the purchase of the farm by DHS were truthfully

disclosed to the officials of the DHS.

3. BONGIVELI paid for acquisition of farm Rietspruit from its own

resources.

And did there and then by the means of the said misrepresentation induce

Department of Human Settlement and / or its officials to believe the said


45

misrepresentations and to act thereupon to their prejudice, actual or potential,

to consider and enter into a sale agreement for the purchase of Rietspruit farm

and pay an amount of R32 million to BONGIVELI, and to the prejudice of

FREEMAX and its Directors and / or servants, actual or potential.

Whereas the accused at the time when they made aforesaid

misrepresentation well knew that-

4. BONGIVELI did not own farm Rietspruit.

5. The accused will acquire, in a convoluted manner, fees for the purchase

of the farm from DHS.

6. The transfer and registration of ownership will be executed in a manner

that will enable BONGIVELI to acquire ownership of Rietspruit from

money paid by the DHS to SINGWANE Attorneys.

ALTERNATIVE TO COUNT 51: THEFT

AND WHEREAS payment of the amount of R32 million by the DHS to SINGWANE

Attorneys for the purchase of farm RIETSPRUIT was made on the strength of

misrepresentations made to the officials of the DHS by the accused.

AND WHEREAS the said amount of R32million was the property of the DHS or in

lawful possession of its officials.

NOW THEREFORE the accused are guilty of theft

IN THAT during or about the period 17 March 2011 to 11 April 2011 to and at or

near Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga, the accused did


46

unlawfully and intentionally appropriate and steal an amount of R32 million or

any part thereof the property of or in lawful possession of the Provincial

Department of Human Settlement and / or its officials

In the event of a conviction either on the main count or the alternative the state

will request that the accused be dealt with in terms of Section 51 (2) (a) of Act

105 of 1997 (minimum sentence is 15 years)

COUNTS 52 – 59: CORRUPTION IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 3 (b) (ii) (cc)

READ WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1, 2, 24 AND 26 (1) OF ACT 12 OF 2004

– Offering a benefit (Against accused 13, 14 and 15)

AND WHEREAS SINGWANE paid FREEMAX through Werkmans Attorneys R15 661

018.59 for the purchase price of farm Rietspruit, inclusive of commission.

AND WHEREAS Werkmans paid Accused 15 commission in an amount of R4 680

000.00

AND WHEREAS the accused paid BONGIVELI and its members amounts of

money mentioned in Column C to Schedule 2 hereto

NOW THEREFORE the accused are guilty of the crime of contravening the

provisions of section 3 (b) (ii) (cc) READ WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1, 2,

24 AND 26 (1) OF PREVENTION AND COMBATING OF CORRUPT ACTIVITIES ACT,

ACT 12 OF 2004
47

In that upon or about the dates mentioned in Column B to Schedule 2 hereto

and at or near Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga the

accused did wrongfully and intentionally, directly or indirectly give or offered

to give gratification in the form of an amount of money mentioned in Column

C to Schedule 2 to any other person, to wit persons mentioned in Column D to

Schedule 2 whether for the benefit of himself or for the benefit of another

person, in order to act, personally or by influencing another person to act in a

manner that amounts to the illegal, dishonest, unauthorised, incomplete, or

biased exercise, carrying out or performance of any powers, duties, or

functions arising out of a constitutional, statutory, contractual or any legal

obligation, to wit reward for appointing accused 15 as agent.

Schedule 2

Column A Column B Column C Column D

Count Date Amount Recipient

52 08/02/2011 R40 000 BONGIVELI

53 09/02/2011 R20 000 BONGIVELI

54 18/02/2011 R50 000 BONGIVELI

55 14/04/2011 R290 403.92 BONGANI SIBIYA (Accused 11)

56 14/04/2011 R250 000 WILLEM MAGAGULA (Accused

10)

57 21/04/2011 R250 000 BONGANI SIBIYA (Accused 11)


48

58 21/04/2011 R519 975.00 WILLEM MAGAGULA (Accused

10)

59 01/06/2011 R100 000 BONGANI SIBIYA (Accused 11)

COUNTS 60 – 67: CORRUPTION IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION OF 3 (a) (i) and

(iv) READ WITH SECTIONS 1, 2, 24, 25 and 26 (1) (a) OF ACT 12 OF 2004 –

Accepting a benefit

(In terms of section 156 of Act 51 of 1977 against Accused 10, 11 and 12 only)

In that upon or about the dates mentioned in Column B to Schedule 2 and at

or near Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused did

wrongfully and intentionally, directly or indirectly accept or offered to accept

gratification in the form of an amounts of money mentioned in Column C to

Schedule 2 from any other person, to wit PFUKA AFRIKA whether for the benefit

of himself or for the benefit of another person, in order to act, personally or by

influencing another person to act in a manner that amounts to the illegal,

dishonest, unauthorised, incomplete, or biased exercise, carrying out or

performance of any powers, duties, or functions arising out of a constitutional,

statutory, contractual or any legal obligation, to wit reward for appointing

PFUKA AFRIKA as an agent.

COUNTS 68 – 69: MONEY LAUNDERING IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 4 OF

PREVENTION OF ORGANISED CRIME ACT, ACT 121 OF 1998 (In terms of section

156 of Act 51 of 1977 against Accused 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 only)


49

WHEREAS the amount of R3 644 100.00 and R2 092 681.00 paid by SINGWANE

on 19 April 2011 and 05 May 2011, respectively, to LITTLE RIVER constituted or

formed part of proceeds of unlawful activities;

AND WHEREAS the accused knew or ought reasonably to have known that the

said amounts were or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful activities;

NOW THEREFORE the accused are guilty of the offence of contravening

Section 4 read with sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act,

1998 (Act 121 of 1998);

IN THAT upon or about 19 April 2011 and on or about 05 May 2011 and at or

near Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused entered

into an agreement with each other and or any other person and / or engaged

in arrangements or transactions and /or performed acts with the amount of R3

644 100.00 and R2 092 681.00, which had or were likely to have had the effect

of:-

• Concealing or disguising the nature, source, location, disposition or

movement of the said amounts of money or ownership thereof or any

interest which anybody might have had in respect thereof and / or;

• Enabling or assisting any person who has committed an offence to avoid

prosecution and/or to remove or diminish the money acquired directly

as a result of the commission of a crime.


50

FIRST ALTERNATIVE TO COUNTS 68 – 69: ACQUSITION OR POSSESSION OR USE

PROCEEDS OF UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 6 READ

WITH SECTIONS 1 AND 8 OF ACT 121 OF 1998

WHEREAS the amounts referred to in counts 68 – 69 were and / or formed part

of the proceeds of unlawful activities of another person or persons;

AND WHEREAS the accused acquired, were in possession of or used the said

amount of money;

NOW THEREFORE the accused are guilty of contravening Section 6 read with

Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998 (Act 121 of

1998);

IN THAT upon or about the period mentioned in counts 68 – 69 and at or near

Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused did

unlawfully acquire, have in possession of or use the aforesaid amount of money

knowing or having ought reasonably to have known that the amount of R3 644

100.00 and R2 092 681.00, respectively, or any part thereof was or formed part

of the proceeds of unlawful activities of another person.

SECOND ALTERNATIVE TO COUNTS 68 – 69: ASSISTING ANOTHER TO BENEFIT

FROM PROCEEDS OF UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 5

READ WITH SECTIONS 1 AND 8 OF ACT NO. 121 OF 1998

WHEREAS the amounts referred to in counts 68 and 69 was and / or formed

part of the proceeds of unlawful activities;


51

AND WHEREAS the accused assisted any person or persons to benefit from the

said amount;

NOW THEREFORE the accused are guilty of the offence of contravening

Section 5 read with Sections 1 and 8 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act,

1998 (Act 121 of 1998);

IN THAT upon or about the period mentioned in counts 68 – 69 and at or near

Mbombela in the Regional Division of Mpumalanga the accused did

unlawfully assist a person or persons whose identity or identities is or are to the

state unknown to benefit from the proceeds of unlawful activities knowing or

having ought reasonably to have known that the aforesaid amount of money

was or formed part of the proceeds of unlawful activities.

Вам также может понравиться