00

00
(a

060
a

a
Reference Calculation Output

C DESIGN INFORMATION

BS 5400: Characteristic strength of concrete, fcu = 30 N/mm2

Part 4:1990 Characteristic strength of reinforcement, fy = 460 N/mm2
Table 13 Thickness of Abutment stem = 1100 mm
RDA Bridge Width of Abutment stem = 7440 mm
Design Thickness of Wing Wall = 500 mm
Manual;1997 Severe environment condition, for driving rain
and Nominal cover = 45 mm
Employee's
Requirement
Reference Calculation Output

D LOAD CASES

Horizontal forces are critical for abutment wall and hence only the effects of load
Combination 4.0 is considered for the r/f design of abutment stem. Load
Combination 1.0 is considered to check the crack width and stresses at
servicebility lmit state

Consider the 1m width of the abutment wall for structural analysis and design.
Effect of the wingwalls are ignored in the abutment design.Wing walls are
designed seperately according to their loading condition and cantilever action.

D-1 LOAD COMBINATIONS

BS5400: LOAD COMBINATION 1

Part 2 1978
LOADING CASE 1-1 (with HA Live loads)
4.4.4
(Dead + Soil pressure +HA primary loads)
Following loadings will be considered.
- Dead and superimposed dead loads
From super- structure (bridge beams, deck slab, diaphragms, guard rail,
wearing surface)
From sub- structure (self weight of abutment, wing walls, back wall,
corbel)
- Soil pressure and HA surcharge pressure
- HA primary live load

LOADING CASE 1-2 (with HB Live loads)

(Dead + Soil pressure +HA primary loads+HB primary live loads)
Following loadings will be considered.
- Dead and superimposed dead loads
From super- structure (bridge beams, deck slab, diaphragms, guard rail,
wearing surface)
From sub- structure (self weight of abutment, wing walls, back wall,
corbel)
- Soil pressure and HB surcharge pressure
- HA primary live load
- HB primary live load

LOAD COMBINATION 4

LOADING CASE 4-1 (with HA Live loads)

(Dead + Soil pressure + HA Primary + HA Secondary)
Following loadings will be considered.
- Dead and superimposed dead loads

From super- structure (bridge beams, deck slab, diaphragms, guard rail,
wearing surface)
From sub- structure (self weight of abutment, wing walls, back wall,
corbel)
- Soil pressure and HA surcharge pressure
- HA primary live load
- HA secondary live load
Reference Calculation Output

LOADING CASE 4-2 (with HB Live loads)

(Dead + Soil pressure + HA Primary + HB Primary + HB Secondary)
Following loadings will be considered.
- Dead and superimposed dead loads

From super- structure (bridge beams, deck slab, diaphragms, guard rail,
wearing surface)
From sub- structure (self weight of abutment, wing walls, back wall,
corbel)
- Soil pressure and HB surcharge pressure
- HA primary live load
- HB primary live load
- HB secondary live load
Reference Calculation Output

E ABUTMENT STEM
E-1 LOADS ON ABUTMENT STEM
Following Figure illustrates loads considered on substructure for structural analysis

Dead (Corbel)
Dead
Primary live loads
Superimposed dead
(From approach slab)
BEARING C. L.

Dead
Superimposed dead
Primary live loads
Dead (From superstructure)
(Back wall)
Secondary
live loads

H=6800
HA Surcharge Pressure
HB Surcharge Pressure

Soil Pressure
Dead
(Abutment Stem)
H/2
H/3

Soil Pressure Distribution HA Surcharge Pressure

HB Surcharge Pressure 1100

2600 1900

Fig 3. Forces on Abutment wall

DESIGN SECTION

Fig 4. Design section of Abutment Wall

Reference Calculation Output
E-2 DESIGN LOADS

E-2-1 DESIGN LOAD EFFECTS AT ABUTMENT BOTTOM LEVEL

Ref. Effects Design Load per 1m

Section III
Chapter
G-4-1 Design Bending moment. My 1099 kNm/m
Load Case 4-2
Table 09

Design Sheare Force 373 kN/m

Design vertical load 518 kN/m

E-2-2 DESIGN LOAD EFFECTS AT 2.0 m FROM ABUTMENT BOTTOM LEVEL

Ref. Effects Design Load per 1m

Section III
Chapter
G-4-2 Design Bending moment. My 494 kNm/m
Load Case 4-2
Table 10

Design Sheare Force 238 kN/m

Reference Calculation Output
E-3 SUMMARY OF RESULTS

AT ABUTMENT BOTTOM LEVEL

Vertical r/f Horizontal r/f
Effect Required Equivalent Provision Required Equivalent Provision
2 2 2
mm /m mm /m mm /m mm2/m
Bending 2939 3272 T25@150 - - -

Secondary - - - 1232 1340 T16@150

Thermal 960.244 1340 T16@150 1259 1340 T16@150

AT 2.0 m FROM ABUTMENT BOTTOM LEVEL

Vertical r/f Horizontal r/f
Effect Required Equivalent Provision Required Equivalent Provision
2 2 2
mm /m mm /m mm /m mm2/m

Bending 1261 1340 T16@150 - - -

Secondary - - - 1232 1340 T16@200

Thermal 1340 1340 T16@150 1259 1340 T16@150

Actual Provision
Vertical r/f Horizontal r/f
Inner surface Outer surface Inner surface Outer surface

AT BOTTOM
T25@150
LEVEL
T16@150 T16@125
AT 2.0 m ABOVE
T16@150
BOTTOM LEVEL
Reference Calculation Output
F WING WALLS AND CHAMFERS
F-1 DESIGN LOADS

Design Loads were carried out according to the following wing wall arrangements
6500

(+22.317) 0.698% (+22.272)

1160
(+21.041)

SLOPE 1:1.5

(+18.115)

(+15.615)
1100

2000

Fig 6. Left Wing Wall

6500
(+22.260) (+22.305)
0.698%
5
1145

5
5 (+21.031)

SLOPE 1:1.5

(+18.115)

(+15.615)
1100

2000

Fig 7. Right Wing Wall

Reference Calculation Output
H-2 DESIGN LOADS

H-2-1 DESIGN LOAD EFFECTS FOR RIGHT WING WALL AND RIGHT CHAMFER

Design Load Effects

Ref. Effects
Total Per m length

Bending moment due to 1168 kNm

cantilever action , Ma

Shear Force 354 kN

H-1 Bending Moment due to Lateral 559 kNm 210 kNm/m

H-1-1 loads, Mb1

Bending Moment in the left

chamfer due to Lateral loads , 694 kN 261 kNm/m
Mc

F-2-2 DESIGN LOAD EFFECTS FOR LEFT WING WALL AND LEFT CHAMFER

Design Load Effects

Ref. Effects
Total Per m length

Bending moment due to 1167 kNm

cantilever action,Ma

Shear Force 354 kN

H-1 Bending Moment due to Lateral 556 kNm 210 kNm/m

H-1-2 loads, Mb1

Bending Moment in the left

chamfer due to Lateral loads, 689 kN 260 kNm/m
Mc
Reference Calculation Output
F-2 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
F-2-1 LEFT WING WALL AND LEFT CHAMFER

B C

Section III
Chapter H-
5

Vertical r/f Horizontal r/f

Element Effect Required Equivalent Provision Required Equivalent Provision
mm2/m mm2/m mm2/m mm2/m
Bending - - - 1232 1340 T16@150

A Secondary 531 754 T12@150 - - -

Thermal 527.223 754 T12@150 713.0676 754 T12@150

Bending Provided as in the abutment stem 1229 1340 T32@150

B Secondary - - - - - -

Thermal 527 754 T12@150 527 754 T12@150

Bending Provided as in the abutment stem 573 754 T12@150

Minimum
1796 2094 T20@150
(0.15%bd)
C
Secondary Provided as in the abutment stem Provided as in the abutment stem

Thermal - - - - - -

Actual Provision
Vertical r/f Horizontal r/f
Inner surface Outer surface Inner surface Outer surface

A T12@150 T12@150 T16@150 T12@150

B T12@150 T12@150 T16@150 T12@150

C T25@150 T16@150 T20@150 T16@150

Reference Calculation Output

F-2-2 RIGHT WING WALL AND RIGHT CHAMFER

C B

Section III
Chapter G-
2

Vertical r/f Horizontal r/f

Element Effect Required Equivalent Provision Required Equivalent Provision
2 2 2
mm /m mm /m mm /m mm2/m
Bending - - - 1229 1340 T16@150

A Secondary 536.4 754 T12@150 - - -

Thermal 527.223 754 T12@150 527 754 T12@150

Bending Provided as in the abutment stem 1232 1340 T32@150

B Secondary - - - - - -

Thermal 527 754 T12@150 527 754 T12@150

Bending Provided as in the abutment stem 560 754 T12@150

Minimum
(0.15%bd)
C
Secondary Provided as in the abutment stem Provided as in the abutment stem

Thermal - - - - - -

Actual Provision
Vertical r/f Horizontal r/f
Inner surface Outer surface Inner surface Outer surface

A T12@150 T12@150 T16@150 T12@150

B T12@150 T12@150 T16@150 T12@150

C T25@150 T16@150 T20@150 T16@150