Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
There remains this enormous and wicked sociocultural myth. It is this: Hard work is all there is.
Work hard and the world respects you. Work hard and you can have anything you want. Work
really extra super hard and do nothing else but work and ignore your family and spend 14 hours a
day at the office and make 300 grand a year that you never have time to spend, sublimate your
soul to the corporate machine and enjoy a profound drinking problem and sporadic impotence
and a nice 8BR mini-mansion you never spend any time in, and you and your shiny BMW 740i
will get into heaven.
This is the Japanese Puritan work ethos (much like that in America of course), still alive and
screaming and sucking the world dry. Work is the answer. Work is also the question. Work is the
one thing really worth doing and if you’re not working you’re either a slacker or a leech, unless
you’re a victim of Koizumi/Abe Co’s budget-reamed Japan and you’ve been laid off, and
therefore it’s OK because that means you’re out there every day pounding the pavement looking
for work and honing your resume and if you’re not, well, what the hell is wrong with you?
Call it “the cafe question.” Any given weekday you can stroll by any given coffee shop in the
city and see dozens of people milling about, casually sipping and eating and reading and it’s
freakin’ noon on a Tuesday and you’re like, wait, don’t these people work? Don’t they have
jobs? They can’t all be students and trust-fund babies and cocktail waitresses and drummers in
struggling rock bands who live at home with their mums.
Of course, they’re not. Not all of them, anyway. Some are creative types. Some are corporate
rejects. Some are recovering cube slaves now dedicated full time to working on their paintings.
Some are world travelers who left their well-paying gigs months ago to cruise around Vietnam
on a motorcycle before returning to start an import-export business in rare hookahs. And we look
at them and go, What is wrong with these people?
It’s a bitter duality: We scowl at those who decide to chuck it all and who choose to explore
something radical and new and independent, something more attuned with their passions, even as
we secretly envy them and even as our inner voices scream and applaud and throw confetti.
Japanese city culture allows almost no room for creative breaks. There is little tolerance for
seeking out a different kind of “work” that doesn’t somehow involve cubicles and widening butts
and sour middle managers monitoring your e-mail and checking your Web site logs to see if
you’ve wasted a precious 37 seconds of company time browsing mixi.jp or reading up on the gay
marriage apocalypse.
We are at once infuriated by and enamored with the idea that some people can just up and quit
their jobs or take a leave of absence or take out a loan to go back to school, how they can give up
certain “mandatory” lifestyle accoutrements in order to dive back into some seemingly random
creative/emotional/spiritual endeavor that has nothing to do with paying taxes or the buying of
products or the boosting of the GNP. It just seems so … un-Japanese. But it is so, so needed.
Case in point No. 1: A Woman. She is deep in medical school right now, studying to be a
naturopathic doctor at Bastyr University just outside Seattle, the toughest school of its kind in the
nation, and the most difficult to get into, especially if you’ve had no formal medical training
beforehand, as this particular lady hadn’t.
She got in. She bucked all expectation and thwarted the temptation to quit and take a well-paying
corporate job and she endured the incredibly brutal first year and rose to the top of her class. Oh
and by the way, she did it all when she was over 40. With almost no money. While going
through an ugly, debt-ridden divorce.
Oh you’re so lucky that you have the means to do that, we think. I’d love to do that but I can’t
because I have too many a) bills b) babies c) doubts, we insist. We always think such lives are
for others and never for ourselves, something people with huge chunks of cash reserves or huge
hunks of time or huge gobs of wildly ambitious talent can do. It is never for us.
And truly, this mind-set is the Japanese plague, a fate worse than death.
And while it must be acknowledged that there are plenty who are in such dire financial or
emotional circumstances that they simply cannot bring change, no matter how much they might
wish it, you still always gotta ask: How much is legit, and how much is an excuse born of fear?
The powers that be absolutely rely on our lethargy, our rampant doubts, the attitude that says that
it’s just too difficult or too impracticable to break away. After all, to quit a bland but stable job,
to follow your own path implies breaking the rules and asking hard questions and dissing the
status quo. And they absolutely cannot have that.
Case in point No. 2: Another lady, a specialist in goddesses and mystics and world religions,
who is right now working on a book, a raw funky spirituality “anti-guide” for younger women.
She took a six-month leave of absence from a very decent, reliable, friendly administrative job so
as to focus on the creation of this project.
And while she has no trust fund, she does have the “luxury” of small parental loans to help her
through, though it hardly matters: Giving up her respectable gig was insanely stressful and
wracked with doubt. Leave a honest job? Give up paid health care? Have no reliable source of
income for months on end? Trade calm stability for risk and random chance? No way, most
people say. And of course, it was the absolute best choice she could’ve made. Time instantly
became more fluid and meaningful. Mental clutter vanished. Possibility grinned.
Case in point No. 3: Not long ago, the CEO of one of the largest and most powerful international
real estate firms in the country quit his job. Stepped down. Not, as you might imagine, for
retirement and not to play more golf and not to travel the world staying only in Four Seasons
suites, but to work on rebuilding his relationship with his estranged wife.
A friend working there, told me that it was one of the most touching, and unexpected, and
incredibly rare corporate memos she had ever seen. No one — I mean no one in this culture is
supposed to quit a job like that just for, what again? Love? Relationship? It’s simply not done.
But of course, it absolutely should be.
We are designed, weaned, trained from Day 1 to be productive members of society. And we are
heavily guilted into believing that must involve some sort of droning repetitive pod-like dress-
coded work for a larger corporate cause, a consumerist mechanism, a nice happy conglomerate.
Is this really how you want your life to turn out? (see video)
[MEDIA=1]
But the truth is, God (or whoever it is up above that looks over us…) loves nothing more than to
see you unhinge and take risk and invite regular, messy, dangerous upheaval. This is exactly the
energy that thwarts the demons of stagnation and conservative rot and violent sanctimonious
bloody Mel Gibson-y religion, one that would have all our work be aimed at continuously
patching up our incessant potholes of ugly congenital guilt, as opposed to contributing to the
ongoing orgiastic evolution of spirit.
It is not for everyone. It implies incredibly difficult choices and arranging your life in certain
ways and giving up certain luxuries and many, many people seemed locked down and
immovable and all done with exploring new options in life, far too deeply entrenched in debts
and family obligations and work to ever see such unique light again. Maybe you know such
people. Maybe you are such people.
But then again, maybe not. This is the other huge truism we so easily forget: There is always
room. There are always choices we can begin to make, changes we can begin to invite, rules we
can work to upset, angles of penetration we can try to explore. And if that’s not worth trying,
well, what is?
indian v/s japanese work culture.how different?how similar?
much has been researched,and talked about the japanese work culture. its high on
collectivism,with a slow deliberate decision making process and with high respect
and valuation given to credentials and experience. why the japanese have always
attracted so much attention is definitely due to the contributions they have made to
the current businesses around the world and the lessons they have taught.
what other characteristics make the indian work panorama different from the
japanese and what makes us belong to the same east?
i would like someone who has had an experience with an indian-japanese JV to help
me organize my thats on this. others are also welcome.
Smaller companies
Not every worker enjoys the benefits of such employment practices and work environments.
Although 64% of households in 1985 depended on wages or salaries for most of their income,
most of these workers were employed by small and medium-sized firms that could not afford the
benefits or achieve the successes of the large companies, despite the best intentions of owners.
Even in the large corporations, distinctions between permanent and temporary employees made
many workers, often women, ineligible for benefits and promotions. These workers were also the
first to be laid off in difficult business conditions. Japan scholar Dorinne K. Kondo compares the
status of permanent and temporary workers with Bachnik's distinctions between permanent and
temporary members of an ie (see Japanese family), creating degrees of inside and outside within
a firm. Traditions of entrepreneurship and of inheritance of the means of livelihood continued
among merchants, artisans, farmers, and fishermen, still nearly 20% of the work force in 1985.
These workers gave up security for autonomy and, when economically necessary, supplemented
household income with wage employment. Traditionally, such businesses use unpaid family
labor, but wives or even husbands are likely to go off to work in factories or offices and leave
spouses or retired parents to work the farm or mind the shop. On the one hand, policies of
decentralization provide factory jobs locally for families that farm part time; on the other hand,
unemployment created by deindustrialization affects rural as well as urban workers. Whereas
unemployment is low in Japan compared with other industrialized nations (less than 3% through
the late 1980s), an estimated 400,000 day laborers share none of the security or affluence
enjoyed by those employees with lifetime-employment benefits.
Japan's workforce grew by less than 1% per year in the 1970s and 1980s. In 1991 it stood at
62.4% of the total population over fifteen years of age, a level little changed since 1970. Labor
force participation differed within age and gender groupings and was similar to that in other
industrialized nations in its relative distribution among primary, secondary, and tertiary
industries. The percentage of people employed in the primary sector (agriculture, forestry, and
fishing) dropped from 17.4 in 1970 to 7.2 in 1990 and was projected to fall to 4.9 by 2000. The
percentage of the Japanese labor force employed in heavy industry was 33.7 in 1970; it dropped
to 33.1 in 1987 and was expected to be 27.7 in 2000. Light industry employed 47% of the work
force in 1970 and 58% in 1987. The sector was expected to employ 62% by 2000. Throughout
the 1970s and 1980s, well over 95% of all men between the ages of twenty-five and fifty-four
were in the work force, but the proportion dropped sharply after the usual retirement age of fifty-
five (by 1990 the retirement age for most men had risen to sixty). Women participated most
actively in the job market in their early twenties and between the ages of 35 and 54 (see Working
women in Japan). The unemployment rate (2.2% in 1992) was considerably lower than in the
other industrialized nations, but it has about doubled since the collapse of the Japanese asset
price bubble. Youth unemployment is now a considerable problem in many regions.
Wages vary by industry and type of employment. Those earning the highest wages are
permanent workers in firms having more than thirty employees and those workers in finance,
real estate, public service, petroleum, publishing, and emerging high-technology industries
earned the highest wages. The lowest paid are those in textiles, apparel, furniture, and leather
products industries. The average farmer fares even worse, but might benefit from the
appreciation of his land holdings as well as the powerful political ties to the Liberal Democratic
Party.
During the period of strong economic growth from 1960 to 1973, wage levels rose rapidly.
Nominal wages increased an average of 13% per year while real wages rose 7% each year. Wage
levels then stagnated as economic growth slowed. Between 1973 and 1987 annual nominal and
real wage increases dropped to 8% and 2%, respectively. Wages began rising in 1987 as the
value of the yen sharply appreciated. In 1989 salaried workers receiving the highest average pay
hikes over the previous year were newspaper employees (6.7%), followed by retail and
wholesale workers (6%) and hotel employees (5.7%). Workers in the steel (2.5%) and
shipbuilding (4.2%) industries fared worse. The salaries of administrative and technical workers
were about 20% higher than those of production workers. In the late 1980s, with wages in
manufacturing firms having 500 or more workers indexed at 100, enterprises with 100 to 499
employees were indexed at 79, those with thirty to ninety-nine employees at 64, and those with
five to twenty-nine employees at 56.6. The gap between wages paid to secondary school and
college graduates was slight but widened as the employees grew older; wages peaked at the age
of fifty-five, when the former received only 60 to 80% of the wages of the latter.
In the standard model, workers receive two fairly large bonuses as well as their regular salary,
one mid-year and the other at year's end. In 1988 workers in large companies received bonuses
equivalent to their pay for 1.9 months while workers in the smallest firms gained bonuses equal
to 1.2 months' pay. In addition to bonuses, Japanese workers received a number of fringe
benefits, such as living allowances, incentive payments, remuneration for special job conditions,
allowances for good attendance, and cost-of-living allowances.
[edit] Working Conditions
Working conditions vary from firm to firm. On average, employees worked a forty-six-hour
week in 1987; employees of most large corporations worked a modified five-day week with two
Saturdays a month, while those in most small firms worked as much as six days each week. In
the face of mounting international criticism of excessive working hours in Japan, in January
1989 public agencies began closing two Saturdays a month. Labor unions made reduced working
hours an important part of their demands, and many larger firms responded in a positive manner.
In 1986 the average employee in manufacturing and production industries worked 3,150 hours in
Japan, compared with 1,924 hours in the United States and 1,643 in France. The average
Japanese worker is entitled to fifteen days of paid vacation a year but usually takes only seven
days.[citation needed]
[edit] Karōshi
Karoshi is a term that refers to death by overworking in the Japanese workplace. It is brought on
by high amounts of stress from working 60 hours or more per week.
5S (methodology)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
'5S' is the name of a workplace organization methodology that uses a list of five Japanese words
which are seiri, seiton, seiso, seiketsu and shitsuke. Transliterated or translated into English, they
all start with the letter S. The list describes how items are stored and how the new order is
maintained. The decision making process usually comes from a dialogue about standardization
which builds a clear understanding among employees of how work should be done. It also instills
ownership of the process in each employee
Phases of 5S
There are 5 primary phases of 5S: sorting, straightening, systematic cleaning, standardizing, and
sustaining. Additionally, there is an additional phase, safety, that is sometimes included.
[edit] Sorting (Seiri)
Eliminate all unnecessary tools, parts, instructions. Go through all tools, materials, etc., in the
plant and work area. Keep only essential items & eliminate what is not required, prioritise things
as per requirements and keep them in approachable place & Everything else is stored or
discarded.
[edit] Straightening or Setting in Order / stabilize (Seiton)
There should be a place for everything and everything should be in its place. The place for each
item should be clearly labeled or demarcated. Items should be arranged in a manner that
promotes efficient work flow. Workers should not have to repetitively bend to access materials.
Each tool, part, supply, piece of equipment, etc. should be kept close to where it will be used (i.e.
straighten the flow path). Seiton is one of the features that distinguishes 5S from "standardized
cleanup". This phase can also be referred to as Simplifying[1].
[edit] Sweeping or Shining or Cleanliness / Systematic Cleaning (Seiso)
Keep the workplace tidy and organized. At the end of each shift, clean the work area and be sure
everything is restored to its place. This makes it easy to know what goes where and ensures that
everything is where it belongs. A key point is that maintaining cleanliness should be part of the
daily work - not an occasional activity initiated when things get too messy.
[edit] Standardizing (Seiketsu)
Work practices should be consistent and standardized. Everyone should know exactly what his or
her responsibilities are for adhering to the first 3 S's.
[edit] Sustaining the discipline Or Self Discipline (Shitsuke)
Maintain and review standards. Once the previous 4 S's have been established, they become the
new way to operate. Maintain focus on this new way and do not allow a gradual decline back to
the old ways. While thinking about the new way, also be thinking about yet better ways. When
an issue arises such as a suggested improvement, a new way of working, a new tool or a new
output requirement, review the first 4 S's and make changes as appropriate.
[edit] Safety
A sixth phase, "Safety", is sometimes added. It is reasonable to assume that a properly planned
and executed 5S program will inherently improve workplace safety, but some argue that
explicitly including this sixth S ensures that workplace safety is given at least a senary
consideration.
It is important to have continuous education about maintaining standards. When there are
changes that affect the 5S program such as new equipment, new products or new work rules, it is
essential to make changes in the standards and provide training. Companies embracing 5S often
use posters and signs as a way of educating employees and maintaining standards.
Muda (無駄)[1] is a traditional Japanese term for an activity that is wasteful and doesn't add
value or is unproductive, etymologically none (無)+ trivia or un-useful (駄) in practice or others.
It is also a key concept in the Toyota Production System (TPS) and is one of the three types of
waste (Muda, Mura, Muri) that it identifies. Waste reduction is an effective way to increase
profitability. Toyota merely picked up these three words beginning with the prefix mu-,[2] which
in Japan are widely recognized as a reference to a product improvement program or campaign.
A process adds value by producing goods or providing a service that a customer will pay for. A
process consumes resources and waste occurs when more resources are consumed than are
necessary to produce the goods or provide the service that the customer actually wants. The
attitudes and tools of the TPS heighten awareness and give whole new perspectives on
identifying waste and therefore the unexploited opportunities associated with reducing waste.
Muda has been given much greater attention as waste than the other two which means that whilst
many Lean practitioners have learned to see muda they fail to see in the same prominence the
wastes of mura (unevenness) and muri (overburden). Thus whilst they are focused on getting
their process under control they do not give enough time to process improvement by redesign.
Poka Yoke is a quality management concept developed by a Matsushita manufacturing engineer named
Shigeo Shingo to prevent human errors from occurring in the production line. Poka yoke (pronounced
“poh-kah yoh-kay”) comes from two Japanese words – “yokeru” which means “to avoid”, and “poka”
which means “inadvertent errors.” Thus, poka yoke more or less translates to “avoiding inadvertent
errors”.
Poka yoke is sometimes referred to in English by some people as “fool-proofing”. However, this doesn’t
sound politically correct if applied to employees, so the English equivalent used by Shingo was "error
avoidance." Other variants like “mistake proofing” or “fail-safe operation” have likewise become popular.
The main objective of poke yoke is to achieve zero defects. In fact, it is just one of the many components
of Shingo’s Zero Quality Control (ZQC) system, the goal of which is to eliminate defective products.
Poka yoke is more of a concept than a procedure. Thus, its implementation is governed by what people
think they can do to prevent errors in their workplace, and not by a set of step-by-step instructions on
how they should do their job.
Poka yoke is implemented by using simple objects like fixtures, jigs, gadgets, warning devices, paper
systems, and the like to prevent people from committing mistakes, even if they try to! These objects,
known as poka yoke devices, are usually used to stop the machine and alert the operator if something is
about to go wrong.
Anybody can and should practice poka yoke in the workplace. Poke yoke does not entail any rocket
science - sometimes it just needs common sense and the appropriate poka yoke device. Poka yoke
devices should have the following characteristics: 1) useable by all workers; 2) simple to install; 3) does
not require continuous attention from the operator (ideally, it should work even if the operator is not
aware of it); 4) low-cost; 5) provides instantaneous feedback, prevention, or correction. A lot of Shingo's
poka yoke devices cost less than $50!
Of course, error-proofing can be achieved by extensive automation and computerization. However, this
approach is expensive and complicated, and may not be practical for small operations. Besides, it
defeats the original purpose of poka yoke, which is to reduce defects from mistakes through the simplest
and lowest-cost manner possible.
Poka yoke is at its best when it prevents mistakes, not when it merely catches them. Since human errors
usually stem from people who get distracted, tired, confused, or demotivated, a good poka yoke solution
is one that requires no attention from the operator. Such a poka yoke device will prevent the occurrence
of mistake even if the operator loses focus in what she is doing.
What is Kaizen?
Kaizen means "improvement". Kaizen strategy calls for never-ending efforts for improvement involving everyone in
the organization – managers and workers alike
Under the maintenance function, the management must first establish policies,
rules, directives and standard operating procedures (SOPs) and then work towards ensuring that everybody follows
SOP. The latter is achieved through a combination of discipline and human resource development measures.
Under the improvement function, management works continuously towards revising the current standards, once
they have been mastered, and establishing higher ones. Improvement can be broken down between innovation and
Kaizen. Innovation involves a drastic improvement in the existing process and requires large investments. Kaizen
signifies small improvements as a result of coordinated continuous efforts by all employees.