Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1. A manufacturing firm has three types of 6. With good internal control procedures, a
inventories: (1) raw materials, (2) work-in- perpetual inventory record provides better
process, and (3) finished goods. Raw control over inventory because it always
materials are goods acquired in an shows the amount of inventory that should
undeveloped state that compose a major be in the warehouse (except for theft). A
part of a finished product. Work-in-process periodic inventory record shows only the
inventory is the partly finished products. amount of inventory that was on hand at the
Finished goods are the completed products beginning of the period. With the periodic
waiting for sale. method, the inventory account is not
adjusted until the next physical count is
2. The cost of inventory consists of all the
taken, usually at the end of an accounting
costs involved in buying and preparing
period.
merchandise for sale. For a manufacturing
company, inventory cost for raw materials 7. Purchase discounts and purchase returns
generally includes the purchase price paid are accounted for differently with the two
for the materials, freight costs, and receiving methods. With the periodic method, both
and storage costs. The cost of work-in- discounts and returns are accounted for by
process inventory includes the cost of raw using separate accounts (Purchase
materials, the cost of production labor, and Discounts and Purchase Returns); these are
some share of the cost of the manufacturing contra accounts to the purchases account.
overhead required to keep the factory With the perpetual method, discounts and
running. The cost of finished goods returns are accounted for by crediting
inventory is the total of the materials, labor, Inventory directly. Since a perpetual
and manufacturing overhead costs used in inventory account always shows the amount
the production process for those items. of inventory that should be on hand, when
inventory is returned to suppliers, the
3. It is more difficult to account for the
inventory account must be decreased.
inventory of a manufacturing firm than for a
merchandising firm because the former has 8. The costs of transporting inventory into a
three different types of inventories: raw firm are not treated in the same way as the
materials, work-in-process, and finished costs of transporting inventory out. The
goods. In addition, the work-in-process and costs of transporting inventory into the firm
finished goods inventories are composed of are treated as an addition to the costs of
raw materials, labor, and manufacturing inventory, whereas costs of transporting
overhead. Often, it is difficult to measure the inventory out of the firm are delivery
amount of labor and manufacturing expenses (operating expenses). The reason
overhead that should be included in the for the different treatments is that the total
inventory amounts. cost of inventory is the amount paid for the
inventory plus those costs necessary to get
4. The buyer owns merchandise being shipped
it ready for sale. For example, if a company
under the terms FOB shipping point; thus,
located in San Francisco buys inventory in
the buyer would generally pay the shipping
Chicago, that inventory will not be worth
costs and be responsible for any other
anything to the firm until it is in San
ownership costs during shipping.
Francisco and ready for sale. Thus, the total
5. The cost of inventory is transferred from an cost of the inventory is the sum of the
asset to an expense when the inventory is purchase price and the shipping costs
sold. Until sold, inventory is a current asset (freight in).
on the balance sheet. When sold, it
9. Missing a purchase discount raises the cost
becomes part of the cost of goods sold on
of inventory. Increased inventory cost
the income statement.
259
260 Chapter 8
ultimately means higher cost of goods sold 15. The LIFO inventory costing alternative
and lower net income. results in paying the lowest taxes when
prices are rising. With LIFO, the most
10. With a perpetual system, Inventory is
current costs (and the most expensive when
already adjusted to its ending balance
prices are rising) flow to the income
(unless there is theft or shrinkage) because
statement.
the inventory account is adjusted with the
recording of every sale and purchase 16. A firm cannot always use one inventory
transaction. With a periodic system, the costing alternative for tax purposes and
inventory account must be adjusted at the another for financial reporting purposes; the
end of the period because no adjustments IRS has ruled that firms using LIFO for tax
have been made to the inventory account purposes generally must use it for financial
throughout the period. The closing process, reporting purposes as well.
under a periodic method, involves closing
17. It is necessary to know which inventory cost
Net Purchases to Inventory and then
flow alternative firms are using before
adjusting Inventory to the appropriate
comparing their financial records because
amount. Through this process, the
the costing method can indicate how closely
purchases and purchase-related accounts
the reported inventory amounts reflect
are closed, the inventory account is adjusted
current inventory costs. For example, a firm
to its ending balance, and the cost of goods
using LIFO during inflationary periods will
sold amount ends up in the cost of goods
probably have very old inventory costs on its
sold account.
balance sheet, but its income statement will
11. Even though perpetual inventory records quite accurately reflect the amount of real
should always reflect the amount of net income earned. On the other hand, a
inventory actually on hand, the inventory still firm that uses FIFO will show relatively
needs to be counted to discover the extent accurate current costs of inventory on the
of theft, spoilage, and clerical errors. Also, a balance sheet, but its income statement will
physical count is a good way to identify show net income that is unrealistically high
which inventory is obsolete, broken, because the cost of goods sold does not
damaged, or slow selling. consist of current costs. In trying to compare
two firms, one using FIFO and one using
12. The only adjusting entry required to account
LIFO, the differences in the inventory and
for inventory with the perpetual method is
net income amounts might result more from
the entry to reflect any shortage or overage
how inventory costs are handled than from
from theft, obsolescence, and accounting
differences in amounts of inventory on hand
errors. All other entries to the inventory
or the profitability of the company.
account are made when merchandise is
purchased, sold, or returned, or when 18. The inventory turnover ratio reveals how fast
discounts are granted. inventory is sold—how long inventory is
being held before it is sold. Holding other
13. When goods being held on consignment are
things constant, the inventory turnover ratio
included in the ending inventory balance,
can provide a preliminary indication of how
inventory is overstated. When ending
well the organization is managing its
inventory is overstated, cost of goods sold is
inventory.
understated, and the result is an
overstatement of both gross margin and net 19.* When inventory is not recorded as a
income. purchase but is included in the inventory
balance, the amount of net income is
14. “Movement of goods” refers to the flow of
overstated. As shown here, an
the actual inventory through the firm; “cost
understatement of the purchase amount
flow” refers to the flow of the costs of the
results in an understatement of cost of
inventory. A firm may have a FIFO physical
goods sold and a corresponding
flow pattern for the inventory, but may use
overstatement of both gross margin and net
FIFO, LIFO, or average cost for costing the
income.
inventory.
Beginning inventory xxx (OK)
+ Net purchases xxx (understated)
Chapter 8 261
= Cost of goods amount that could be realized from the sale of the
available for sale xxx (understated) merchandise. Writing inventory down to its
– Ending inventory xxx (OK) net realizable value before its sale is the
= Cost of goods sold xxx (understated) conservative approach because it
Gross margin xxx (overstated) recognizes losses on inventory when they
Net income xxx (overstated) occur instead of when the inventory is sold.
It also guarantees that inventories will not be
*Relates to expanded material.
carried on the books at amounts that exceed
20.* When inventory is sold and shipped but not their future economic benefits.
recorded as a sale, net income will be
23.* Inventory is always valued at the lower of
understated. As shown below, when sales
cost or market. If the replacement price of
are understated and net cost of goods sold
inventory drops significantly below the cost,
is correct, the gross margin and net income
it must be written down to market
will be understated.
(replacement cost) so that the normal profit
Sales revenue xxx (understated) can be realized when the merchandise is
Cost of goods sold: finally sold. This approach is required under
Beginning inventory xxx (OK) generally accepted accounting principles
+ Net purchases xxx (OK) because it writes off any expired economic
= Cost of goods benefits of assets in a timely manner.
available for sale xxx (OK)
24.* When firms cannot count their inventory,
– Ending inventory xxx (OK)
they may use various methods to estimate
= Cost of goods sold xxx (OK)
the value of inventory. If a company uses
Gross margin xxx (understated
the perpetual method of accounting for
because
inventory and is preparing monthly or
of sales)
quarterly financial statements, the perpetual
Net income xxx (understated
inventory balance is assumed to be correct.
because
However, with the periodic method an
of sales)
estimate must be made. The most common
21.* Although the costs of the units on hand and method of estimating inventory is the gross
sold after each transaction are the same margin method. This method uses beginning
under FIFO perpetual and FIFO periodic, inventory, purchases, sales, and the
computation of average cost and LIFO historical gross margin percentage to
under a perpetual system changes every estimate cost of goods sold and ending
time a purchase is made. With a perpetual inventory.
system, the exact timing of these purchases
*Relates to expanded material.
is tracked throughout the period; with a
periodic system, the computations are made
only at the end of the period.
22.* Inventory should be valued at its net
realizable value when it is damaged, used,
or obsolete. The net realizable value is the
262 Chapter 8
PRACTICE EXERCISES
The correct answer is A. Cranes at a construction site have not been purchased
with the intent of being resold to customers. The answer is not D because the
screws would be considered part of the overhead cost involved in the
manufacturing of inventory.
Collin Wholesale owns the inventory on December 31, year 1. With shipping
terms of FOB destination, the seller owns the inventory during transit because
ownership does not transfer until the goods reach their destination.
Perpetual Periodic
a. Automobile dealer X
b. Summer snow-cone stand X
c. Supermarket X
d. Large appliance retailer X
e. Newsstand X
f. Discount clothing retailer X
Both the summer snow-cone stand and the newsstand involve busy (hopefully)
locations where the sales price of the merchandise is substantially greater than
the cost of the merchandise. Thus, it doesn’t make economic sense to potentially
lose customers by making them wait while you do detailed accounting to track
inventory that has a relatively low cost.
Chapter 8 263
With the cost of computing continuing to decline, the number of businesses for
which a perpetual inventory system makes economic senses increases every
year.
1. and 2.
Perpetual Periodic
Inventory........................ 25,000 Purchases................... 25,000
Accounts Payable. . . Accounts Payable.
25,000 25,000
1. and 2.
Perpetual Periodic
Inventory........................ 690 Freight In........................ 690
Cash.......................... 690 Cash.......................... 690
1. and 2.
Perpetual Periodic
Accounts Payable......... 2,000 Accounts Payable......... 2,000
Inventory.................. 2,000 Purchase Returns.... 2,000
Returned 20 tables costing $100 each; 20 $100 = $2,000.
1. and 2.
Perpetual Periodic
Accounts Payable......... 23,000 Accounts Payable......... 23,000
Inventory.................. 460 Purchase Discounts 460
Cash.......................... Cash..........................
22,540 22,540
Paid for 230 tables [(250 purchased – 20 returned) $100 = $23,000] with a 2%
discount ($23,000 0.02 = $460).
264 Chapter 8
1. and 2.
Perpetual Periodic
Accounts Receivable.... 8,000 Accounts Receivable.... 8,000
Sales (50 $160)...... 8,000 Sales......................... 8,000
Cost of Goods Sold...... 5,050
Inventory (50 $101) 5,050
1. and 2.
Perpetual Periodic
Sales Returns (8 $160). . 1,280 Sales Returns.................... 1,280
Accounts Receivable. . 1,280 Accounts Receivable. . 1,280
Inventory (8 $101).......... 808
Cost of Goods Sold..... 808
For computation of the cost per table, refer to Practice 8–10.
1. Inventory......................................................................... 23,230
Purchase Returns.......................................................... 2,000
Purchase Discounts...................................................... 460
Freight In................................................................. 690
Purchases............................................................... 25,000
Cameras Costs
Beginning inventory 8 $ 800
Net purchases 34 4,000
Goods available for sale 42 $4,800
Ending inventory 16 1,755
Cost of goods sold 26 $3,045
Cameras Costs
Beginning inventory 8 $ 800
Net purchases 34 4,000
Goods available for sale 42 $4,800
Ending inventory 16 1,990
Cost of goods sold 26 $2,810
Cameras Costs
Beginning inventory 8 $ 800
Net purchases 34 4,000
Goods available for sale 42 $4,800
Ending inventory 16 1,680
Cost of goods sold 26 $3,120
1. Average cost of goods sold: 26 units $114.286 per unit = $2,971 (rounded)
2. Average ending inventory: 16 units $114.286 per unit = $1,829 (rounded)
365 365
Number of Days’ Sales in Inventory = Inventory Turnover = = 59.35 days
6.15 *
*For computation of inventory turnover, refer to Practice 8-20.
1. and 2.
Last Year % Two Years Ago %
Sales $5,000,000 $5,000,000
Cost of goods sold (estimated) 1,750,000 1,500,000
Gross profit (estimated) $3,250,000 $3,500,000
EXERCISES
1. $ 30,000 counted
– 8,000 on consignment from suppliers
+ 10,000 on consignment to customers
$ 32,000 ending inventory
2. $ 27,000 beginning inventory
+ 59,000 net purchases
$ 86,000 cost of goods available for sale
– 32,000 ending inventory (determined in question 1)
$ 54,000 cost of goods sold
3. $ 36,000 counted
+ 4,000 on consignment to customers
– 10,000 on consignment from suppliers
$ 30,000 ending inventory
4. $ 24,000 beginning inventory
X net purchases
$ 77,500 cost of goods available for sale
– 30,000 ending inventory (determined in question 3)
$ 47,500 cost of goods sold
X = $47,500 + $30,000 – $24,000 = $53,500
Inventory................................................................................. 216,000
Purchase Returns.................................................................. 4,000
Purchases....................................................................... 220,000
Closed temporary inventory accounts.
Cost of Goods Sold............................................................... 244,000
Inventory......................................................................... 244,000
To adjust the inventory account to the appropriate
balance of $92,000. ($120,000 beginning inventory
+ $216,000 net purchases – $92,000 ending inventory
= $244,000)
Chapter 8 273
Inventory................................................................................. 12.25
Inventory Shrinkage/Growth........................................ 12.25
To adjust inventory after physical count.
($150.00 + $54.40 + $60.00 + $52.90 = $317.30;
$317.30 – $305.05 = $12.25)
Chapter 8 275
Purchases:
4 Type A rings at $600 = $2,400
2 Type B rings at 450 = 900
5 Type C rings at 300 = 1,500
$4,800
Ending inventory:
Ring A 7 units at $600 = $ 4,200
Ring A 9 units at 650 = 5,850
Ring B 5 units at 300 = 1,500
Ring B 4 units at 350 = 1,400
Ring B 3 units at 450 = 1,350
Ring C 3 units at 200 = 600
Ring C 4 units at 250 = 1,000
Ring C 5 units at 300 = 1,500
$17,400
276 Chapter 8
2. Sales:
Ring A 2 units at $1,000 = $ 2,000
Ring A 3 units at 1,050 = 3,150
Ring A 1 unit at 1,200 = 1,200
Ring B 2 units at 850 = 1,700
Ring B 2 units at 800 = 1,600
Ring C 4 units at 450 = 1,800
Ring C 3 units at 500 = 1,500
Ring C 1 unit at 550 = 550
$13,500
1. LIFO
2. LIFO
3. FIFO
4. Average cost
5. LIFO
Chapter 8 277
FIFO
Cost of Goods Sold
Ring Type Units Cost Total Cost
A 6 $600 $3,600
B 4 300 1,200
C 7 200 1,400
C 1 250 250
$6,450
Beginning inventory...................................................... $19,650
Net purchases................................................................ 4,800*
Cost of goods available for sale.................................. $24,450
Cost of goods sold........................................................ 6,450
Ending inventory............................................................ $18,000
*4 $600 = $2,400; 2 $450 = $900; 5 $300 = $1,500;
$2,400 + $900 + $1,500 = $4,800
LIFO
Cost of Goods Sold
Ring Type Units Cost Total Cost
A 4 $600 $2,400
A 2 650 1,300
B 2 450 900
B 2 450 900
C 5 300 1,500
C 3 250 750
$7,750
EXERCISE 8–14 FIFO, LIFO, and Average Cost Calculations (Periodic Inventory
Method)
(a) FIFO
Cost of goods sold....................42 computers at $1,100 = $46,200
Cost of goods available for sale........................................................ $110,950
Less cost of goods sold..................................................................... 46,200
Ending inventory................................................................................. $ 64,750
Cost of goods available for sale:
Beginning inventory....................................50 computers at $1,100 = $ 55,000
Nov. 5 Purchase....................................12 computers at $1,250 = 15,000
11 Purchase....................................17 computers at $1,300 = 22,100
24 Purchase....................................13 computers at $1,450 = 18,850
Cost of goods available for sale........................................................ $110,950
(b) LIFO
Cost of goods sold................13 computers at $1,450 = $18,850
17 computers at $1,300 = 22,100
12 computers at $1,250 = 15,000
$55,950
Cost of goods available for sale........................................................ $110,950
Less cost of goods sold..................................................................... 55,950
Ending inventory................................................................................. $ 55,000
(c) Average Cost
Units
Model J computers available for sale.......................... 92 (50 + 12 + 17 + 13)
Model J computers sold................................................ 42
Model J computers ending inventory.......................... 50
$110,950
Average cost = = $1,205.98 per computer (rounded)
92
Cost of goods sold.................................42 computers at $1,205.98 = $50,651
Ending inventory....................................50 computers at $1,205.98 = $60,299
Chapter 8 279
4. Dallen pays its suppliers in 41 days, on average. Dallen collects cash from
customers in 140 days (96 days + 44 days). So, on average, 99 days (140
days – 41 days) elapse between the time suppliers are paid and the time
cash is received from customers.
280 Chapter 8
1. a b c
Sales revenue................................ $ 84,000 $ 84,000 $ 80,000
Beginning inventory..................... $ 18,000 $ 18,000 $ 18,000
Net purchases................................ 44,000 44,000 44,000
Cost of goods available for sale.. $ 62,000 $ 62,000 $ 62,000
Ending inventory........................... (13,000) (11,000) (11,000)
Cost of goods sold....................... $ 49,000 $ 51,000 $ 51,000
Gross margin................................. $ 35,000 $ 33,000 $ 29,000
2. The proper method is (b): recording the sale and not counting the inventory.
1. Purchases.................................................................................. 400
Accounts Payable............................................................... 400
Purchased 50 standard widgets at $8 each.
2. Purchases.................................................................................. 300
Accounts Payable............................................................... 300
Purchased 15 deluxe widgets at $20 each.
6. No entry. The floor of $10 is now above the replacement cost, and the
widgets were written down to $10 in transaction 4. (Ceiling is $16, floor is
$10, and replacement cost is $9.)
Sales........................................................................................ $91,300
Cost of goods sold:
Beginning inventory......................................................... $ 5,750
Net purchases................................................................... 58,000
Cost of goods available for sale..................................... $63,750
Ending inventory.............................................................. 4,405†
Cost of goods sold................................................................ 59,345
Gross margin (0.35 $91,300).............................................. $31,955
†
$63,750 – $59,345
Sales............................................................................. $2,000,000
Cost of goods sold:
Beginning inventory.............................................. $ 300,000
Net purchases........................................................ 1,600,000
Cost of goods available for sale.......................... $1,900,000
Ending inventory................................................... 500,000**
Cost of goods sold..................................................... 1,400,000
Gross margin (0.30 $2,000,000).............................. $ 600,000
**$1,900,000 – $1,400,000
Computed ending inventory...................................... $ 500,000
Actual ending inventory............................................. 450,000
Missing inventory........................................................ $ 50,000
PROBLEMS
1. $ 52,600
+ 3,000 a
– 800 b
+ 2,000 c
+ 6,000 d
+ 600 e (2)
+ 4,600 e (4)
$ 68,000 Ending inventory
3. It is helpful to first look at the inventory and related accounts to see what adjustments are needed.
PERIODIC PERPETUAL
Inventory Inventory
Auto tires Auto tires
beg. inv. 4,000 beg. inv. 4,000
Truck tires Truck tires
beg. inv. 5,600 beg. inv. 5,600 (c) 480
(a) 20,000
(b) 24,000
Purchases
(g) 16,000
(a) 20,000
(i) 280 (h) 16,000
(b) 24,000
21,400
Purchase Returns
After posting entries (a)–(i), the inventory
(d) 480
account has a balance of $21,400.
PROBLEM 8–2 (Continued)
The cost of goods sold account will be closed with other closing entries.
PROBLEM 8–3 Income Statement Calculations
The easiest way to solve this problem is to set up the known data in income
statement format as follows:
Criddle Company
Income Statement
For the Year Ended December 31, 2006
Revenues:
Gross sales............................................... $ (1)
Less sales returns.................................... 3,250
Net sales.................................................... $101,750
Cost of goods sold:
Inventory, January 1, 2006...................... $25,000
Gross purchases...................................... $ (2)
Less purchase returns............................ (1,250)
Add freight in............................................ 500 (2)
Cost of goods available for sale............ $75,000
Less inventory, December 31, 2006....... (4)
Cost of goods sold........................................... (3)
Gross margin.................................................... $ (5)
Operating expenses......................................... 6,750
Net income........................................................ $ (6)
Given the above statement, the calculations can be completed in the following
order:
1. a. FIFO
Beginning inventory units...... 460
Purchase, January 16.............. 110
Purchase, February 16............ 105
Purchase, March 10................. 150
Total units available................ 825
Units sold:
January 25........................... (216)
February 27......................... (307)
March 30.............................. (190)
Total units sold........................ (713)
Ending inventory..................... 112
Units Total Cost
Ending inventory................................ 112 (at $28) $3,136
Cost of goods sold: Units Total Cost
Beginning inventory........................... 460 (at $30) $13,800
Purchase, January 16......................... 110 (at $32) 3,520
Purchase, February 16....................... 105 (at $36) 3,780
Purchase, March 10............................ 38 (at $28) 1,064
713 $22,164
Or:
Cost of goods available for sale....... $25,300
Less ending inventory....................... 3,136
Cost of goods sold............................. $22,164
Gross margin:
Sales revenue...................................... $31,500*
Less cost of goods sold.................... 22,164
Gross margin....................................... $ 9,336
*Sales revenue:
216 at $45 = $ 9,720
307 at 40 = 12,280
190 at 50 = 9,500
$31,500
PROBLEM 8–5 (Continued)
b. LIFO
Units Total Cost
Ending inventory................................ 112 (at $30) $3,360
Cost of goods sold: Units Total Cost
Purchase, March 10............................ 150 (at $28) $ 4,200
Purchase, February 16....................... 105 (at $36) 3,780
Purchase, January 16......................... 110 (at $32) 3,520
Beginning inventory........................... 348 (at $30) 10,440
713 $21,940
Or:
Cost of goods available for sale....... $25,300
Less ending inventory....................... 3,360
Cost of goods sold............................. $21,940
Gross margin:
Sales revenue...................................... $31,500
Less cost of goods sold.................... 21,940
Gross margin....................................... $ 9,560
c. Average cost
Units Total Cost
Beginning inventory........................... 460 (at $30) $13,800
Purchase, January 16......................... 110 (at $32) 3,520
Purchase, February 16....................... 105 (at $36) 3,780
Purchase, March 10............................ 150 (at $28) 4,200
825 $25,300
$25,300
= $30.67 average cost (rounded)
825
Ending inventory:
112 at $30.67 = $3,435
Cost of goods sold:
Cost of goods available for sale....... $25,300
Less ending inventory....................... 3,435
Cost of goods sold............................. $21,865
Gross margin:
Sales revenue...................................... $31,500
Less cost of goods sold.................... 21,865
Gross margin....................................... $ 9,635
PROBLEM 8–5 (Concluded)
2. In this case, the average cost alternative results in the highest gross margin.
The reason for this unusual result is that prices are neither going up nor
going down consistently, but are moving randomly in both directions. Since
the highest costs are the average costs (not the earliest or latest), the
average cost alternative keeps more of these costs in inventory than do the
other two alternatives.
1. FIFO
Cases remaining.................................................................................. 4,120
Cost of goods available for sale:
4,250 at $9.50.................................................................................. $40,375
1,350 at $10.00............................................................................... 13,500
980 at $10.50............................................................................... 10,290
1,830 at $11.00............................................................................... 20,130
8,410 $84,295
Cost of goods sold:
4,250 cases at $9.50 = $40,375
40 cases at $10.00 = 400
$40,775
Cost of goods available for sale........................................................ $84,295
Cost of goods sold.............................................................................. 40,775
Ending inventory................................................................................. $43,520
2. LIFO
Cost of goods sold:
1,830 cases at $11.00 = $20,130
980 cases at $10.50 = 10,290
1,350 cases at $10.00 = 13,500
130 cases at $9.50 = 1,235
$45,155
Cost of goods available for sale........................................................ $84,295
Cost of goods sold.............................................................................. 45,155
Ending inventory................................................................................. $39,140
3. Average cost
Cost of goods available for sale........................................................ $84,295
Total units available............................................................................ ÷ 8,410
Average cost per unit.......................................................................... $ 10.02
Cost of goods sold: $10.02 4,290 = $42,986
Ending inventory: $84,295 – $42,986 = $41,309
PROBLEM 8–7 Calculating and Interpreting Inventory Ratios
1. Number of Days’
Inventory Turnover Sales in Inventory
$1,578 M 365
Captain Geech Boating
( $462 M + $653 M) /2 = 2.83 times 2.83
= 129 days
$1,100 M 365
Merchant Marine = 10.48 times = 35 days
( $120 M + $90 M) /2 10.48
2. The results of the ratios show that Captain Geech Boating has more than a
third of the year’s inventory on hand, while Merchant Marine has just over
one month’s inventory on hand. Captain Geech could be holding inventory
longer because it is selling expensive boats, or the company could be
carrying too much inventory. Both ratios show that Merchant Marine is
managing its inventory more efficiently with a smaller amount of money tied
up in inventory.
1. Net Ending
Purchases Inventory
$ 80,800 $29,800
+ 1,800 + 800
– 3,000 – 300
$ 79,600 $30,300
The best way to solve this problem is to remember that inventory overstatements at the beginning of the year
reduce net income, and overstatements at the end of the year increase net income as shown below.
(Understatements have the opposite effect.)
The correct amount of net income can be calculated by subtracting overstatements of ending inventory and
adding overstatements of beginning inventory. Remember that the ending inventory of one period becomes the
beginning inventory of the next period.
2003 2004 2005 2006
Reported net income........................................................................ $30,000 $40,000 $35,000 $45,000
Inventory overstatement, beginning of year................................. 3,000
Inventory understatement, beginning of year............................... (4,000) (1,000)
Inventory overstatement, end of year............................................ (3,000) (2,000)
Inventory understatement, end of year.......................................... 4,000 1,000
Correct net income........................................................................... $34,000 $33,000 $39,000 $42,000
2. Since the ending inventory of 2006 becomes the beginning inventory of 2007, net income would be $3,100
overstated.
1. FIFO
Total cases available........................................................................... 8,300
Total cases sold................................................................................... 4,300
Total cases remaining......................................................................... 4,000
Cost of goods available for sale:
4,100 at $10.50 = $43,050
1,500 at 11.00 = 16,500
1,000 at 11.00 = 11,000
1,700 at 11.50 = 19,550
$90,100
Cost of goods sold:
First sale.............................. 950 cases at $10.50 = $ 9,975
Second sale........................ 1,450 cases at 10.50 = 15,225
Third sale............................. 1,700 cases at 10.50 = 17,850
200 cases at 11.00 = 2,200
$45,250
Cost of goods available for sale........................................................ $90,100
Cost of goods sold.............................................................................. 45,250
Ending inventory................................................................................. $44,850
2. LIFO
Cost of goods sold:
First sale.............................. 950 cases at $11.00 = $10,450
Second sale........................ 1,000 cases at 11.00 = 11,000
450 cases at 11.00 = 4,950
Third sale............................. 1,700 cases at 11.50 = 19,550
100 cases at 11.00 = 1,100
100 cases at 10.50 = 1,050
$48,100
Cost of goods available for sale........................................................ $90,100
Cost of goods sold.............................................................................. 48,100
Ending inventory................................................................................. $42,000
3. Average cost
4,100 at $10.50 = $43,050
Aug. 4 New cost per unit = 1,500 at 11.00 = 16,500
5,600 $59,550
$59,550/5,600 units = $10.63 per unit
4,650 at $10.63 = $49,430
Aug. 13 New cost per unit = 1,000 at 11.00 = 11,000
5,650 $60,430
$60,430/5,650 units = $10.70 per unit
4,200 at $10.70 = $44,940
Aug. 26 New cost per unit = 1,700 at 11.50 = 19,550
5,900 $64,490
$64,490/5,900 units = $10.93 per unit
Cost of goods sold:
$ 90,100
– 43,720 (4,000 cases at $10.93 per case) Ending inventory
$ 46,380 Cost of goods sold
1. a. FIFO
Remaining Inventory
Number
Number Unit Total of Units Total
Date Transaction of Units Cost Cost and Cost Cost
Jan. 1 Beg. inventory 460 $30 $13,800 460 @ $30 $13,800
16 Purchase 110 32 3,520 460 @ $30 17,320
110 @ $32
25 Sale (216) 30 (6,480) 244 @ $30 10,840
110 @ $32
Feb. 16 Purchase 105 36 3,780 244 @ $30 14,620
110 @ $32
105 @ $36
27 Sale (307) 244 @ $30 (9,336) 47 @ $32 5,284
63 @ $32 105 @ $36
Mar. 10 Purchase 150 28 4,200 47 @ $32 9,484
105 @ $36
150 @ $28
30 Sale (190) 47 @ $32 (6,348) 112 @ $28 $ 3,136
105 @ $36
38 @ $28
Sales....................................................... $31,500
Cost of goods available for sale.......... $25,300
Ending inventory................................... 3,136
Cost of goods sold................................ 22,164
Gross margin......................................... $ 9,336
b. LIFO
Remaining Inventory
Number
Number Unit Total of Units Total
Date Transaction of Units Cost Cost and Cost Cost
Jan. 1 Beg. inventory 460 $30 $13,800 460 @ $30 $13,800
16 Purchase 110 32 3,520 460 @ $30 17,320
110 @ $32
25 Sale (216) 110 @ $32 (6,700) 354 @ $30 10,620
106 @ $30
Feb. 16 Purchase 105 36 3,780 354 @ $30 14,400
105 @ $36
27 Sale (307) 105 @ $36 (9,840) 152 @ $30 4,560
202 @ $30
Mar. 10 Purchase 150 28 4,200 152 @ $30 8,760
150 @ $28
30 Sale (190) 150 @ $28 (5,400) 112 @ $30 $ 3,360
40 @ $30
Sales....................................................... $31,500
Cost of goods available for sale.......... $25,300
Ending inventory................................... 3,360
Cost of goods sold................................ 21,940
Gross margin......................................... $ 9,560
c. Average cost
Number of Total
Average
Date Transaction Units and Cost Cost† Cost
Jan. 1 Beg. inventory 460 @ $30 $13,800
16 Purchase 110 @ $32 3,520
Average cost ($17,320 ÷ 570 units) $17,320 $30.39
25 Sale (216 @ $30.39) (6,564)
Remaining inventory 354 @ $30.39 $10,756
Feb. 16 Purchase 105 @ $36 3,780
459 @ $31.67 $14,536 $31.67
27 Sale (307 @ $31.67) (9,723)
Remaining inventory 152 @ $31.67 $ 4,813
Mar. 10 Purchase 150 @ $28 4,200
302 @ $29.84 $ 9,013 $29.84
30 Sale (190 @ $29.84) (5,670)
Remaining inventory 112 @ $29.84 $ 3,343
†
Differences due to rounding.
*Relates to expanded material.
PROBLEM 8–12* (Concluded)
Sales....................................................... $31,500
Cost of goods available for sale.......... $25,300
Ending inventory................................... 3,343
Cost of goods sold................................ 21,957
Gross margin......................................... $ 9,543
2. LIFO results in the highest gross margin because it includes the full amount
of the lowest cost ($28) in Cost of Goods Sold.
2. The gross margin method uses a historical (and maybe outdated) gross
margin ratio. To the extent the ratio changes from period to period, it could
be inaccurate.
You should strongly recommend that Mr. Eddie switch inventory methods. Explain to him that the
perpetual inventory method provides for continually updated inventory and cost of goods sold amounts,
whereas the periodic inventory method calculates cost of goods sold and the amount of inventory actually
on hand only at the end of the period. You should advise Mr. Eddie that although the perpetual inventory
method is more time-consuming and probably more expensive, it will assist him in identifying shrinkage
by continuously tracking inventory; also it will aid in determining how much shoplifting and other theft is
occurring. You should tell him that perhaps small businesses with small amounts of inventory can get by
with the periodic inventory method, but that a business like his with large amounts of inventories would
greatly benefit from the additional information the perpetual method provides. You should stress to him
that, with the technology available today, the perpetual inventory records can easily be maintained and he
can minimize inventory holding costs while maximizing customer satisfaction.
Your advice to Mr. Eddie should include the important point that although his business makes its profit by
selling inventory, having too much inventory on hand can be very costly. Holding inventory costs money.
If, for example, you make $10 by selling one unit of inventory, but it costs $3 to order and store the
inventory, the profit shrinks to $7. Assuming customer satisfaction, it is wise to hold just enough inventory
to serve those customers. Wasting money on holding inventory is like any other kind of waste and should
be eliminated.
JUDGMENT CALL
JUDGMENT 8–1
You Decide: Should inventory be recorded at cost or fair market value?
1. Microsoft’s inventory consists of unsold software packages, disks, CDs, manuals, and other software-
related materials.
2. As of June 30, 2002, Microsoft reports having $673 million in inventory—less than 1% of total assets
($673/$67,646). In Note 5 of its financial statements, Microsoft discloses that this amount consists of
$505 million in finished goods inventory and $168 million in raw materials and work-in-process
inventory.
3. Microsoft mentions various costs that comprise inventory in its discussion of operating expenses. The
cost of revenue portion of management’s discussion of operating expenses mentions costs related to
Xbox, support and service costs associated with the MSN Internet access and MSN network
services, organizational licensing, WebTV Networks’ operations, and hardware peripherals.
2. If it takes GE approximately 90 days to sell its inventory while vendors expect payment in 30 days,
then GE is going to have to finance the remaining 60 days out of its own pocket or by borrowing. If
GE sells inventory on account, then the firm must wait even longer before it receives money to pay
for the inventory, thereby making the problem even more severe.
1. Hopefully students will realize that McDonald’s number of days’ sales in inventory should be very
short (after all, we don’t want to be fed lettuce and tomatoes that have been sitting around for 60
days), and that La-Z-Boy’s number of days’ sales in inventory is probably much longer.
2. Number of days’ sales in inventory for McDonald’s:
$3,917.4/[($105.5 + $111.7)/2] = 36.1 times
365 days/36.1 = 10.1 days
Number of days’ sales in inventory for La-Z-Boy:
$1,647.33/[($257.89 + $208.66)/2] = 7.1 times
365 days/7.1 = 51.4 days
3. The two companies deal with entirely different types of inventories. McDonald’s inventory is
perishable, so 10 days seems reasonable. La-Z-Boy, on the other hand, deals with furniture.
Furniture is meant to last a long time, and changes in fashion make holding large furniture inventories
risky. Fashion changes quickly, but not as quickly as hamburger can spoil.
INTERNATIONAL CASE: Why No LIFO?
Students often think the American way is the way of the world. If inventory is accounted for a certain way
in the United States, it must be accounted for the same way around the world. Not so with LIFO. With this
case, students are forced to think about the consequences of using the LIFO inventory method.
This case asks students to think about specific issues. In periods of rising prices, a LIFO method will
result in older inventory being disclosed on the balance sheet. In periods of prolonged rising prices, it is
possible for very old inventory to be carried on the books even though that inventory was sold long ago.
In addition, should the company ever dip down into those old inventory layers, the result will be artificially
high profits. This result would relate solely to accounting methods and not to firm performance.
As a result of this case, students should become familiar with the risks associated with LIFO and the care
that must be taken in comparing financial statements of companies using different accounting methods.
The company would make a journal entry debiting Accounts Receivable and crediting Sales. If the
company was using a perpetual inventory system, it would also have to fabricate the purchase of
inventory. Then, when the fictitious inventory was sold, an entry would be made debiting Cost of Goods
Sold and crediting Inventory.
A fraud like this could not go on forever because the receivables would build up on the balance sheet.
Without a real customer to pay the bill, the receivables balance would just get larger and larger.
Eventually, someone would perform an analysis of the accounts receivable and determine that a large
number of accounts were uncollectible.
In reviewing the financial statements, users would analyze changes in relationships among accounts. For
example, cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales may be decreasing if fictitious inventory is being
sold. Also, receivables as a percentage of total assets would be increasing at a faster than expected rate.
The gross margin method of estimating inventory is just that, an estimate. It is used to approximate
inventory values and is commonly used for interim reporting. If the gross margin percentage used differs
significantly from prior periods, then the results may be unreliable. Thus, the difference between the
amount computed using the gross margin method and the inventory count may be a result of estimation
problems inherent in the gross margin method. There may be no theft at all.
The point-of-sale scanners track all inventory that goes through the checkout stands. The scanners do
not account for inventory that is damaged. Thus, the difference in inventory amounts between the point-
of-sale scanners and the inventory count may relate to damaged inventory.
Before investigating the possible theft of inventory, the assumptions and limitations of the point-of-sale
scanners and the gross margin method must be evaluated to determine if the missing inventory amount
relates to actual theft or could be partially accounted for by the limitations of the other methods.
THE DEBATE: One Method for All
The objective of this debate is to require students to think about the pros and cons of the various
inventory methods. The following points should be made by the groups involved in this debate:
It’s OK to Be Different
1. For many firms, the use of LIFO or FIFO makes a great deal of sense.
2. Note disclosure allows for comparability.
The solutions to the Cumulative Spreadsheet Project can be found in the Solutions Manual files in the
Instructor's Resource section of the Albrecht Web site at http://albrecht.swlearning.com. In addition,
the solutions can be found on the Instructor’s Resource CD-ROM, ISBN 0-324-20672-0.
(Internet information changes often. For an updated Internet Search solution, check the text Web site at
http://albrecht.swlearning.com.)
1. Sears devotes a section of its Web site to the company’s history. This material is located in the
“about Sears” section. The site begins with a discussion of how Sears got its start. Sears provides a
time line indicating that the first catalog was issued in 1896.
2. Using the 2002 annual report, inventories remained relatively constant—10.1% in 2002, 11.1% in
2001.
3. Using the 2002 annual report, Sears’ number of days’ sales in inventory for 2002 and 2001 were:
Stop & Think (p. 352): The clear separation between product and service companies is disappearing.
For example, does Microsoft sell a product or a service? What about McDonald’s—product or service?
Microsoft sells both a product and a service. We normally think of Microsoft’s products (software
packages), but Microsoft’s business and reputation are also linked to the continuing service given to
customers. McDonald’s sells products (food), but the reason we are willing to buy the product is the fast
and clean service associated with the “production” process.
Stop & Think (p. 358): If you buy your groceries with a credit card or a bank debit card, what kind of
information can the supermarket accumulate about you?
The supermarket already knows each item you have purchased. If you use a credit card or bank debit
card, the supermarket’s database computer can then match the list of purchases with your name. Over
time, the supermarket can construct a detailed record of your personal buying habits.
Stop & Think (p. 361): Should the returned inventory be recorded at its original cost of $10 per shirt?
The original cost of the shirts was $10. However, the fact that customers have returned them may mean
that something is wrong with the shirts. If the shirts are damaged and can be sold for, say, $6, then they
should be recorded at no more than this $6 amount. Recording inventory at less than its original cost is
discussed in the expanded material section of this chapter.
Stop & Think (p. 369): Over the entire life of a company—from its beginning with zero inventory until its
final closeout when the last inventory item is sold—is aggregate cost of goods sold more, less, or the
same as aggregate purchases? How is this relationship affected by the inventory cost flow assumption
used?
Over the entire life of a company, total cost of goods sold is equal to total inventory purchased. This
mathematical fact is not affected by the inventory cost flow assumption (FIFO, LIFO, or average cost)
used by the company. The inventory cost flow assumption affects only the timing of reported cost of
goods sold, not the total lifetime amount.
Please check the text Web site at http://albrecht.swlearning.com for an updated solution to the Net
Work exercise.