JATA SHANKAR QUESTIONS

IPC: 5 questions.

1. The exceptions to the offence of defamation are:

I. public good

II. Public conducts of a public servant.

III. Report of proceeding of courts.

IV. Merit of a case or conduct of witnesses/parties.

V. Merit of public performances.

VI. Bona-fide censure.

VII. Bona-fide imputation.

VIII. Conveying caution.

(a). I,II,III,V,VI and VIII.

(b). I, III, V, VI and VIII.

(c). II, III, IV, VII and VIII.

(d). All of the above

Answer: d

2. Sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife is not rape, if the wife is

(a). above 18 year of age.

(b). above 15 year of age.

(c). above 16 year of age

(d). above 14 year of age

Answer: b
3. Section 376-A to 376-D of IPC were inserted by the

(a). criminal law amendment act 1983

(b). criminal law amendment act 1984

(c). criminal law amendment act 1985

(d). criminal law amendment Act 1982

Answer: a

4. 'A' projected himself as a Scheduled caste candidate and drew out some additional advantage from
U.P.S.C and Government of India to which he wasn't legally entitled as a General candidate. By taking
advantage of his being a SC candidate he appeared at the IAS exams and also got appointed in that Cadre
on the aforesaid false representation and drew-out his salary from Government of India year to year.

(a). 'A' is guilty of cheating.

(b). 'A' is guilty of cheating and forgery

(c). 'A' is guilty of forgery.

(D). None of the above.

Answer: b

5. 'X' on receiving 'grave and sudden provocation' from 'Z', intentionally caused the death of 'Y', who is
"Z's" brother. 'X' committed the offence of

(a).murder

(b). Grievous hurt

(c). culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

(d). attempt to murder.

Answer: a
Evidence: 5 questions.

1. Mark the incorrect statement:

(a). A rebuttable presumption cannot be overthrown by a contrary evidence, while irrebuttable can.

(b). A conclusive proof is Juris et de jure i.e. incapable of rebuttal.

(c). In substance, there is no difference between 'conclusive evidence' and 'conclusive proof'.

(d). Presumption and onus of proof are two sides of the same coin.

Answer: a

2. Which of the following is a public document?

(a). A post-mortem report.

(b). an insurance policy.

(c). A panchnama prepared by a police officer.

(d). A private waqf deed.

Answer: d

3. 'Necessity/convenience rule' as to the admissibility of evidence, contained in section 32 of Indian

Evidence Act, 1872, is applicable when the maker of a statement:

(a). is dead or cannot be found

(b). has become incapable of giving evidence.

(c).can be found but his attendance cannot be procured without unreasonable delay or expense.

(d). all of the correct.

Answer: d
4. What is not necessary for the confession of a co-accused under section 30 of the Indian Evidence Act,
1872?

(a). all the accused should be tried jointly

(b). trials should be for the same offence or offences.

(c). statement of the co- accused must amount to confession.

(d).it is not necessary that the confession made by a co- accused affect himself.

Answer: d

5. In a case, under section. 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the accused stated to the police that "I
have buried the property stolen by me in the field. I will so it. “The inadmissible part of this statement is:

(a). "I have buried the property in the field".

(b). "stolen by me".

(c). "I will show it".

(d). there is no inadmissible part in the statement.

Answer: b
Cr.P.C: 5 questions.

1. Which of the following magistrates can make an arrest?

(a). executive magistrate

(b). Judicial Magistrate

(c). metropolitan magistrate

(d). all of the above

Answer: d

2. No order issued under section 144, Cr.P.C. shall remain in force for more than:

(a). 15 days.

(b). one month .

(c). Two months.

(d). Three months.

Answer: c

3. In which case it was held that a person has been given protection both by section 161(2), Cr.P.C. and
article 20(3) of the Constitution of India against questions whose answer would have a tendency to
expose the person to a criminal charge.

(a). Gyan Singh vs. State.

(b). Nandini satpathy vs. P.L.Dani.

(c). Rupen Deo Bajaj vs. K.P.S. Gill.

(d). RK Dalmia vs. Delhi administration.

Answer: b
4. What is true about a court of session?

(a). it can take cognizance without commitment.

(b). it cannot take cognizance without commitment.

(c). it can take cognizance on the Recommendation of the district magistrate.

(d).it can take cognizance if the challan is put by the superintendent of police.

Answer: b

5. Under which of the following sections, a Court of Session has the original jurisdiction to take
cognizance:

( a). section 199 of Cr.P.C.

(b). section 200 of Cr.P.C.

(c). section 201 of Cr.P.C..

(d). Section 202 of Cr.P.C.

Answer: a