Implementation of 5S Tools in Bottling Industry To Improvement of Productivity

8 X October 2020
https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2020.31992
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.429
Volume 8 Issue X Oct 2020- Available at www.ijraset.com
Implementation of 5S Tools in Bottling Industry to

Improvement of Productivity
Chhatersingh Rai1, Dr. Pankaj Agarwal2, Dr. P. L. Verma 3
1
Scholar, Professor & Head, 3Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, S.A.T.I. Vidisha, M.P., India
2
Abstract: The motive of the paper is to research on the procedure of 5S execution over all the degrees of associations and feature
the critical commitments of 5S to the associations. The paper depends on a precise writing survey that examines how the usage
of 5S method altogether contributed the advancement of various associations in the term of value, efficiency, powerful use of
room, security and workers assurance esteems. The investigation additionally features the assembling accomplishments through
fruitful 5S activities and deterrents that make impediment in the way of actualizing 5S method. As the topic says “Productivity
enhanced by using 5S tools in bottling Industry” so implementing all the 5 tools i.e. Sort, Straighten, Shine, Standardize, Sustain
for the total quality management and constant improvement in the Operation level of SMV Beverage Pvt. Ltd. The procedure
started by visiting the sight. So, for the study the production data will be our primary data, which will be collected from the
company itself. Observe the efficiency and productivity of industry.
Keywords: Productivity, Seiri, Seiton, Seiso, Seiketsu, Shitsuke
I. INTRODUCTION
The difficulties and serious condition in present day world are described by the word 'Change'. The pervious techniques can't ready
to accomplish the alluring outcomes in an association that are required in the quickly developing rivalry and technologic progress.
The assembling division comprehensively has seen radical changes in the later piece of twentieth century. The accomplishment of
organizations and association be unforeseen to react, oversee and oblige to change. In this unique and innovative world, the mystery
of getting by for any sort of association is to be serious and pioneer in its items or administrations. Typically, this improvement has
been accomplished through execution of best practices, which are picked to meet a specific goal. The capacity to accomplish better
expectations of profitability without relinquishing quality is a significant objective of an assembling firm. Some creator accepts that
so as to accomplish the serious advantages, the associations have capacity to adjust the new conditions productively and rapidly.
The solid arranging of change forms needs powerful procedures and apparatuses. The distinctive association is looking through new
creative thoughts or strategies for diminishing the assembling cost of item, up flooding of value and creation inside least time in the
serious market.. The standard of lean assembling is to bring consistent improvement by decreasing the cost which at long last
methods decrease of cost in administrations and items and subsequently after effect of more benefits.
A. What is 5S?
5S is an administration apparatus or strategy created by Takshi Osada during 1980s so as to comprise and continue better quality,
profitability, safe condition in an association. The idea initially brought up in Japanese assembling part which remains of five
Japanese words: Seiri (Organization), Seiton (Neatness), Seiso (Cleaning), Seiketsu (Standardization) and Shitsuke (discipline). 5S
is program which creates self-pride, respect for other people, and group working among the representatives by taking care of the
association development issues with aggregate exertion.
B. 5 Pillars are as follows

1) Sort
a) Meaning: It takes away all items not desired for current production operations. Allows only the uncovered essentials; when in
doubt, throw it out.
b) Significance: Space, time, money, vigour and other assets can be effectively utilised. Decrease difficulties and irritations in the
work flow. Better communication between works. Upsurge the quality of products and better productivity.
c) Problems Averted: Over crammed of the workplace and difficulties to work in are solved. Storage of time obtains in the
manners of communication. Wastage of time in looking for parts/tools. Surplus items and equipment make it difficult to better
the process flow.
©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 734

2) Set In Order
a) Meaning: Position desired items so that they are convenient to use and tag the items so that any person can find them according
to requirement.
b) Significance: Eradicates numerous kinds of waste, including: Probing waste, waste accumulated while difficulty in utilising the
items. Waste accumulated while difficulty in returning items.
c) Problems Averted: Wastage of motion, wastage of worker vigour, surplus inventory, imperfect products and in secure
circumstances.
3) Shine
a) Meaning: Everything in the workshop should be kept near and clean every day.
b) Significance: Workshop changed into a neat dirt-free place where each worker will work with delight. The items are in their
appropriate place so that it can be used whenever they required.
c) Problems Averted: Uneconomical work and low morals are the results of deficient sunlight. Fewer evident of defect injuries
and slipping floor arise due to wet patches of oil and water. In adequate upkeep of machines tend to failure and cause defects.
4) Standardise
a) Meaning: It is condition when we have to support in order to uphold the previous 3S.
b) Significance: It enables execution of the first three pillars by make sure that conditions do not worsen to former state.
c) Problems Averted: Circumstances go back to their old unwanted level. Areas of work are unclean and messy. Storage place of
tool become jumbled and wastage of time for looking tools. Mess starts to accrue over time and occurrence of reverting.
5) Sustain
a) Meaning: Making a habit of correctly upholding right procedures. In order to reverting essential discipline is installed.
b) Significance: Penalties of not custody to the course of action is superior than penalties of custody to it.
c) Problems Averted: Unnecessary items begin helping up. Selected places are vacant from their respective tools and jigs. No
attention is taken towards the unclean equipment. Good are left under the risk location. Condition of workplace is bad light,
unclean and disordered environment result in lower morals.
Diagram of 5S principles
Figure 1 Diagram of 5S principles

II. LITRATURE SURVEY

Study and investigation of different research articles were accomplished for understanding the system, standards and new patterns
of executing 5s in modern associations. It is been considered that how execution of 5s aided for development in efficiency of their
association. These exploration articles are survey as talked about beneath.
Gheorghe Dulhai et al. (2008) this paper presents a steady improvement procedure, process oriented and hoping to improve
manufacturing at auto vehicle exhaust. The improvement of auto vehicle drains quality, using the "5S" rules, is developed at the
action of the disappointing degrees of the affiliation encouraged and helped by the pervasive organization. The capable execution of
the „5S" approach prompts a subsequent improvement of the exhaust’s quality.
Derya Sevim Korkutetal. (2009) This assessment remembers 5S system for ensuring solicitation and control for the associations and
ensuring the administration of both essential and even the tiniest nuances, has been kept an eye on in full nuances and they have
been taken under the substance of the investigation through selecting the gathering division as pilot office for 5S activities which is
applied at a yacht manufacturing association. 5S activities have been coordinated during 28 weeks in the social gathering part of the
outline subject association. The obtained results are evaluated and it has been seen that the association went to a point better than the
basic status. The clearly saw of the without fail results hold tight 5S confirmation sheets inside the association by all work power
accepted a profitable activity and commitment at the same time. 5S technique isn't an assessment covering a particular time period
rather it is a system protecting the need of the standardization and continuation of all upgrades ought to be performed.
Womack et al. (2010) have inspected the association between's a 5S use and productivity, quality and procedure length estimations
in a tremendous collecting plant. The examination contemplated that lean uses less of everything stood out from customary
collecting.
Kobayashi et al. (2010) have analyzed how a Japanese perspective always, the 5S thought, has been applied to achieve business
improvement in Japan, the UK and the US. Japanese 5S has worried upon 'progress' the most, a consideration on progressively
gainful and amazing business execution, while in the UK and US, 5S was authentically related to 'work'. The impression of 5S in
UK and US was compelled to a business related thought, instead of the Japanese interpretation that 5S is an utilization of life
knowledge to business conditions.
Bayo-Moriones et al. (2010) have explored the association between 5S use, pertinent factors and execution. The important
components contain helper features of the firm, condition, HR and advancement and quality organization. An uncommonly strong
positive association has been found with by far most of the moved manufacturing developments considered and enthusiasm for
quality ventures like ISO 9001 or EFQM. Thusly, it was gathered that 5S is normally seen as a fundamental for ground-breaking
quality activities.
Jose H. Ablanedo-Rosas et al. (2010) in this paper delayed consequences of an exploratory assessment applied to some Mexican
relationship with the purpose of understanding their execution experience, careful associations, and advancing troubles related with
the 5S practice are clarified. The 5S practice is used as the purpose behind bleeding edge quality and interminable improvement
perspectives and the affiliation evaluates the points of interest from 5S utilization, for instance, quality improvement. The 5S
practice is beneficial for creation and organization affiliations and is comprehensive to all affiliations. The enormous test is the way
to meld the 5S practice in everyone’s (employee’s) life.
Zhang and Yaqing (2011) have presented discussions about defects found in 5S execution reliant on assessments finished in
workshops of three exceptionally make (MTO) electronic social affair associations of China. The examination assumed that
coordination and support from all specialists and chiefs were major for viable utilization of 5S.
Khamis et al. (2011) has construed that suitable execution of the 5S activity endless supply of top level organization, full scale
relationship of staff at all levels inside the association, limit and establishment of the business, presentation given to the 5S
development ultimately the drove for the relationship in completing the 5S practices.
Osada (2011) has found 5S as a foundation to a hard and fast quality condition. As demonstrated by Osada, 5S exercises realize
reducing waste and smoothing out gainfulness and quality by improving workplace profitability and updating visual workplace the
officials for recognizing basically consistent operational execution. 5S prompts introducing the estimations of affiliation, neatness,
cleaning, standardization and control into the workplace basically in its present arrangement.
R.T. Salunkhe et al. (2011) In this paper, the objective of additional part the officials is to ensure the openness of additional items
for help in least time with the help of different organization methodologies like 5s structure, Kanban system and unmistakable
Kaizens. The 5s structure helps with understanding the certified condition of additional items in store division. It moreover helps
with managing the additional parts feasibly giving tasteful results. The result shows that the improvement in abatement of glancing
through time and besides control the cost of stock in a general sense developed through 5s, Kanban and kaizen systems. The

glancing through time is diminished from 10 - 15 min. to 6 - 8 min. Shahryar Sorooshian et al.(2012) They have experienced of
executing a 5S program and paper incorporates presentation of a veritable logical investigation, unequivocally the effect of 5S on
some fundamental working environment issues and the compensation power on the choice of utilization of 5S. This paper is
fundamentally depiction of basic information with all focal points and impediments about the possibility of 5S.
Prof. S. B. Khedkar et al. (2012) this investigation is dealt with the execution of 5S way of thinking in the S. P. Plastic Industry
MIDC, Hingna Road, Nagpur 16. 5S execution impacts the instructors and worker of industry that work inside the picked place. By
following the 5S procedure, this assessment effort exhibits vital improvements to prosperity, benefit, profitability, confirmation and
housekeeping. The assessment reports improvements by using when pictures.
Ravinder Kumar Panchal et al. (2012) this paper base on the methodology grasped in 5S and utilization of the equal in the creation
business. The 5S rules procure the phenomenal changes the association, for example: process improvement by costs‟ decline,
extending of feasibility and adequacy in the systems, upkeep and improvement of the machines‟ profitability, prosperity growing
and abatement of the business sullying and squander. Marko Milosevic et. al. (2013) This paper explains the techniques and
strategies for lean thought which uses to grow the capability of all methods in the association. Furthermore show the delayed
consequences of the level of utilization this strategy in worldwide and family unit creation associations. It can assume that enormous
associations give a great deal of thought to "lean" thought, both considering the way that effectiveness, and the satisfaction of their
laborers. Harsha Lingareddy et al. (2013) this paper remembers the examination and change for the work spot of an amassing
industry to execution of 5S. This method helps in constraining the hour of collecting and besides fabricates the zone of work place.
The course of action found by 5S philosophy solely restricts a couple of sorts of wastes in the creation strategy and which finally
assistants in the headway of the affiliation. An Inspection system has been executed dependent on 5S check records and the results
dismembered to attest phenomenal changes like extending viability in progress and quality, improves security.
Albert (2013) has induced that 5S program basically redesigned the nearness of the plant and the expanded care and viewpoint of
the workers. The vast majority of their undertakings achieved a half decline in game plan times, as such improving the advantages
for the affiliation. Rojasra and Qureshi (2013) have coordinated an assessment on execution of 5S way of thinking in the Krishna
Plastic Company, Gujarat, India. The examination revealed that out of the available diverse lean gathering procedures, 5S offers
incredible potential for required improvement. The outcomes of the logical examination after the 5S utilization have revealed that
creation structure efficiency has been improved from 67% to 88.8% in a period scope of ten weeks through 5S execution.
Ramesh et al. (2014) has presented an utilization of 5S in advancement in a Bio-mass taking care of unit. 5S lean development has
been utilized for achieving adventure diagnosing the creation strategy, streamlining the work procedure, emptying/reducing process
waste, cleaning the creation condition. The work was a mix of both culture changes and considerable/physical changes on the shop
floor. The 5S execution has realized overhaul of capability and productivity, while ensuring an enchanting legitimate climate. The
endeavor has drastically changed the plant and developed the establishment for a powerful execution of predictable improvement
similarly as other endorsed systems and quality exercises. Shumin and Xiaoling (2015) have proposed to combine downsizing with
5S organization and endeavored to arrange decreasing into five phases: Seiri, Seiton, Seiso, Seiketsu, Shitsuke. In the wake of
perceiving the major motivations behind 5S and curtailing, they developed a downsizing organization mode for adventures reliant
on 5S organization which could be used to handle extreme requests made during the time spent reducing and downsizing risks.
Through this downsizing mode and method, it is useful to keep away from decreasing threats, to achieve target of downsizing and to
improve battling limits. Sarthi (2016) has communicated that improvement in the introduction of Indian affiliations have been
decayed consistently. Since 5S and TQM strategies for thinking have exhibited its thriving worldwide and Indian affiliations are
also taking a comparative course for focusing on 5S and TQM instruments extensively, one of the noteworthy clarifications behind
ominous execution of Indian relationship on the planet market may be credited to the poor focusing on competency-based getting
ready for the improvement of 5S and TQM.
A. Summation of composing diagram

The execution of the 5S course of action of rules prompts the going with impacts concerning the improvement in quality:
1) Visible results inside a short period of time (2-3 weeks),
2) Workers become familiar with solicitation and control,
3) Labeling causes to see change that will occur,
4) Reduction of physical effort, less setbacks during the creation methodology,
5) Increase of the workers‟ capable planning, better relationship of activities.

III. OBJECTIVES
This assessment intends to explore the impact of 5S practices to improve proficiency of the defective bottled drink delivering
association specifically SMV Beverages Pvt Limited, Saoner, Nagpur, Maharashtra. In like manner, the essential objective of the
assessment is to check and take a gander at the creation and excusal of bundling region of the plant when executing 5S practice.
IV. METHODOLOGY
The procedure assumes an inescapable job in supporting the discoveries. It very well may be finished up from the writing that so as
to discover the 5S usage benefits for manageability in enterprises, one must have the genuine mechanical information/information
for the examination. Following is the philosophy structure.
Introduction
Literature Review
Objectives
Data collection before

implementation of 5S
Data collection after

implementation of 5S
Analysis
Result & Discussion

Figure 2 0 shows different steps in methodology of 5S implementation in bottling plant.
V. DATA COLLECTION & ANALYSIS

A. Company Profile
SMV Beverages Pvt.Ltd., was a bottler for PEPSI Foods Pvt.Ltd., Guru gram and has its assembling office at MIDC Saoner, which
is found 50 kms from Nagpur on Pandhurna (Bhopal) Road. SMV Beverages Pvt.Ltd., Saoner is a youthful and dynamic
organization work in packaging of Soft Drinks, Fruit Beverages and Packaged Drinking Water and Synthetic Syrup for Post Mix
Machines. This assembling office is FSSC 22000(Food Safety Management System) and ISO 14001(Environmental Management
System) Certified. AIB (American Institute of Bakery) Audit Passed.SMV Beverages Pvt.Ltd. significant comprehension of
Bottling refreshments challenges comes from the numerous years' understanding of creating different drinks. The number of
employees working in the plant is 92 who are qualified technically. Capacity of plant is 18000 cases of glass bottles & 8000 cases of
PET bottles of soft drinks, 8000 cases of PET bottles of Drinking Water, 8000 cases of fruit beverages in glass and Synthetic Syrup
100bags /hr in total 40000 cases per day.
B. Methodology Framework
The philosophy of the present investigation centers on around a relative examination of imperfections and wastages when the
execution of 5s innovation. The information of different creation, imperfections, wastages and loses are gathered from the
regulatory official of the previously mentioned plant. The means taken for the investigation are talked about beneath.

C. Methodology Before 5s Execution

The methodology can be understood with the help of a flow chart discussed below before 5s implementation
Rejections due to damaged bottles
Rejections due to other defects
Estimation of total rejections
Final goods produced
Estimating the overall efficiency

after 5s implementation
Estimating the overall efficiency

before 5s implementation
Figure 3 flow chart of methodology before 5s implementation
D. Methodology After 5s Execution

The methodology can be understood with the help of a flow chart discussed below after 5s implementation.
After 5s implementation
The overall production of the bottles in the

bottling plant
Rejection of bottles due to loose cap (LC)
Rejection of bottles due to level pasting (LP)
The overall production of the bottles in the

bottling plant
Rejection of bottles due to loose cap (LC)
Final goods produced excluding rejections

Figure 4 flow chart of methodology before 5s implementation

Study of plant creation of packaging area when execution of 5s

The accompanying information was gathered from an authoritative official of the association when execution of the 5s innovation.
Table 1 The overall production of the bottles in the bottling plant
The overall production of the bottles in the bottling plant
Production (nos.) before 5s implementation(11/01/2020 – 11560 13620 12625 13820 12586

15/01/2020)
Production (nos.) after 5s implementation15/02/2020 - 13525 14123 13689 14980 13860
19/02/2020
The below table 2 shows the Rejection of bottles due to lose cap (LC).
Table 3 The Rejection of bottles due to lose cap (LC)
Rejection of bottles due to lose cap (LC)
Rejection (nos.) due to Loose Cap, before 5s implementation 1083 985 860 910 890
(11/01/2020 – 15/01/2020)
Rejection (nos.) due to Loose Cap, after 5s implementation 856 840 763 840 760
(15/02/2020 - 19/02/2020)
The below table 4 shows the Rejection of bottles due to level pasting (LP).
Table 4 The Rejection of bottles due to level pasting (LP)
Rejection (nos.) due to Level pasting, before 5s 240 265 232 185 196
implementation(11/01/2020 – 15/01/2020)
Rejection (nos.) due to Level pasting, after 5s 128 156 147 112 119
implementation(15/02/2020 - 19/02/2020)
The below table 5 shows the Rejections due to damaged bottles.

Table 5 the rejections due to damaged bottles
Rejection (nos.) due to damaged bottle, before 5s 180 165 194 153 168
implementation(11/01/2020 – 15/01/2020)
Rejection (nos.) due to damaged bottle, after 5s 113 108 123 94 89
implementation(15/02/2020 - 19/02/2020)
The below table 6 show the rejections due to other defects.
Table 6 the Rejections due to other defects
Rejection (nos.) due to other defects, 163 108 116 126 138
before 5s implementation(11/01/2020 –
15/01/2020)
Rejection (nos.) due to other defects, after 106 85 82 75 94
5s implementation(15/02/2020 -
19/02/2020)

The below table 7 show the Total rejections.

Table 7 Total rejections
Total rejections
Total Rejection (nos.) before 5s 1666 1523 1402 1374 1392
implementation(11/01/2020 – 15/01/2020)
Total Rejection (nos.) after 5s implementation(15/02/2020 1203 1189 1115 1121 1062
- 19/02/2020)
The below table 8 shows the Final goods produced excluding rejections.
Table 8 the Final goods produced excluding rejections
Final goods produced excluding rejections
Final goods Produced (nos.) before 5s implementation 9894 12097 11223 12446 11194
(11/01/2020 – 15/01/2020)
Final goods produced (nos.) after 5simplementation 12322 12934 12574 13859 12798
(15/02/2020 - 19/02/2020)
VI. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The association effectively actualized the 5s apparatuses in their various areas of plant and got extremely noteworthy increment in
the profitability and productivity of the plant.
The organization successfully implemented the 5s tools for productivity improvement and they got excellent increase in the
productivity. The significant increase in the plant efficiency was observed after implementing the 5s tools.
Based on data collection, graphs were plotted to show the increase in productivity and decrease in the defects and wastages.
Shown fig. 4 the total production before and after implementation of 5s.
TOTAL PRODUCTION
20000 Items/date
PRODUCTION IN
NUMBERS
10000
0
Production (nos.) before 5s
1 2 3 4 5 implementation(11/01/202
NUMBER OF DAYS 0 – 15/01/2020)
Figure 5 shows the total production before and after implementation of 5s
Below shown fig. 6 the rejection due to loose cap before and after implementation of 5s.
REJECTION DUE TO LOOSE CAP

2000
NUMBER OF
REJECTIONS
1000 Items/date
0
1 2 3 4 5
NUMBER OF DAYS
Figure 6 the rejection due to loose cap before and after implementation of 5s

The below shown fig.7 the rejection due to level pasting before and after implementation of 5s.
REJECTION DUE TO LEVEL PASTING

300
NUMBER OF REJECTIONS
Items/date
200
100
0 Rejection (nos.) due to

Level pasting, before 5s
1 2 3 4 implementation(11/01/20
5 20 – 15/01/2020)
NUMBER OF DAYS
Figure 7 the rejection due to level pasting before and after implementation of 5s
The below shown fig. 8 the rejection due to damaged bottle before and after implementation of 5s.
REJECTION DUE TO DAMAGED BOTTLE

200 Items/date
150
100
Rejection (nos.) due to
50 damaged bottle, before 5s
0 implementation(11/01/20
1 20 – 15/01/2020)
2 3 Rejection (nos.) due to
4 5 damaged bottle, after 5s
NUMBER OF DAYS implementation(26/01/20
20 – 30/01/2020)
Figure 8 the rejection due to damaged bottle before and after implementation of 5s
The below shown fig.9 the rejection due to other defects before and after implementation of 5s.
REJECTION DUE TO OTHER DEFECTS

200
150 Items/date
100
50
Rejection (nos.) due to
0
other defects, before 5s
1 2 implementation(11/01/20
3 4 5 20 – 15/01/2020)
NUMBER OF DAYS
Figure 9 the rejection to other defects before and after implementation of 5s

Fig.10 shows the total rejections before and after implementation of 5s.
TOTAL REJECTIONS
2000
Items/date
1500
1000
500
0 Total Rejection (nos.)
1 2 before 5s
3 4 5 implementation(11/01/20
NUMBER OF DAYS 20 – 15/01/2020)
Figure 10 shows the total rejections before and after implementation of 5s
The below shown fig.11 the final goods produced before and after implementation of 5s.
FINAL GOODS PRODUCED

15000 Items/date
NUMBER OF FINAL GOODS
10000
5000
0
Final goods Produced
1 2 3 4 (nos.) before 5s
5
implementation(11/01/20
20 – 15/01/2020)
NUMBER OF DAYS
Figure 11 final goods produced before and after implementation of 5s
The above shown graphs and figures shows clearly that so much reduction in wastages and defects were achieved after
implementing the 5s tool in the organization. It is also observed to have increase in the productivity and efficiency of the plant.
VII. CONCLUSION
This case study was done in a cold drink manufacturing company namely SMV Beverages Pvt Limited, Seoner, Nagpur,
Maharashtra. The detailed study of the plant production in bottling section was done. The several defects, damages, wastages of the
bottles before the implementation of 5s technology was immensely observed. The total production of the plant in bottling section
was observed before implementation of the 5s technology. Various photographs and tabulated data were illustrated to show the
situation of the plant before the implementation of the 5s technology. Then after the plant successfully implemented the 5s
technology and got significance increase in productivity and efficiency. It was observed to have significant decrease in the defects,
damages and wastages in the bottling section of the plant. The various graphs and figures were illustrated to show the successful
implementation of the 5s technology in the plant. Finally it is concluded that the significance increase in productivity and efficiency
of the plant was achieved using the 5s tools of lean manufacturing.
REFERENCES
[1] Ho, S.K., Cicmil, S. and Fung, C. (2010) ‘The Japanese 5S practice and TQM training’, Training for Quality, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp.19–24.
[2] Imai, M. (2011) Gemba Kaizen: A Common Sense, Low Cost Approach to Management, McGrawHill, London.
[3] Khanna, V.K. (2009) ‘5S and TQM status in Indian organizations’, The TQM Journal, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp.486–501.
[4] Jusko, J. (2013) ‘Seeing is believing’, Industry Weekly, Vol. 251, No. 10, pp. 44–46.
[5] Schmidt, E.K., Newton, K. and Robertson, B. (2009) ‘Project plan for improving inventory and warehouse management using five-S JIT strategy’, Review of
the Electronic & Industrial Distribution Industries, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp.32–45.
[6] De Mente, B. (2014) Japanese Etiquette & Ethics in Business, NTC Business Books, Lincolnwood, Illinois.

[7] Gapp, R., Fisher, R. and Kobayashi, K. (2008) ‘Implementing 5S within a Japanese context: an integrated management system’, Management Decision, Vol.
46, No. 4, pp.565–579.
[8] Osada, T. (2011) The 5S: Five Keys to a Total Quality Environment, Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo.
[9] Suehiro, K. (2011) ‘Seiri, Seiton, Seiso no susumekata: Kanzenseisan no daiippo’, Procedure of Organisation, Arrangement and Cleaning: First Step Towards
Perfect Production, Natsume Books, Tokyo.
[10] Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T. and Roos, D. (2010) The Machine that Changed the World, Harper Collins, New York
[11] Osada, T. (2011) The 5S: Five Keys to a Total Quality Environment, Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo.
[12] Suzuki, T. (2012) New Directions for TPM, Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA.
[13] Sarthi, P. (2016) Towards Implementing Total Quality Management, DGM, Human Resources Development Institute, BHEL, New Delhi.
[14] Devadasan, S.R., Karthikeyan, M., Kannan, K., Sunderraj, G. and Balamurugan, K. (2009) ‘Financial accounting system for quality circle programmes’,
Participation & Empowerment: An International Journal, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp.72–87.
[15] Albert, M. (2003) ‘This shop really shines … and sorts, simplifies, standardizes and sustains’, Modern Machine Shop [online]
http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/this-shop-reallyshinesand-sorts-simplifies-standardizes-and-sustains (accessed 10 June 2014).
[16] Kobayashi, K., Fisher, R. and Gapp, R. (2010) ‘Business improvement strategy or useful tool? Analysis of the application of the 5S concept in Japan, the UK
and the US’, Total Quality Management, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp.245–262.
[17] Khamis, N., Ab Rahman, M.N., Jamaludin, K.R, Ismail, A.R., Ghani, J.A. and Zulkifli, R.(2011) ‘Development of 5S practice checklist for manufacturing
industry’, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, London, UK, 1–3 July, Vol. 1, pp.545–549.
[18] Bayo-Moriones, A., Bello-Pintado, A. and Merino-Dıaz de Cerio, J. (2010) ‘5S use in manufacturing plants: contextual factors and impact on operating
performance’, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp.217–230.
[19] Goetsch, D.L. and Davis, S. (2010) Quality Management for Organizational Excellence: Introduction to Total Quality, Pearson Prentice Hall, United States of
America.
[20] Zhang, S. and Yaqing, T. (2011) ‘Defects and improvement of 5S implementation in the workshop of MTO electronic assembly industry at the pearl river delta
economic zone’, International Conference on Management and Service Science.
[21] Ghodrati, A. and Zulkifli, N. (2013) ‘The impact of 5S implementation organizations performance’, International Journal of Business and Management
Invention, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp.43–49.
[22] Rojasra, P.M. and Qureshi, M.N. (2013) ‘Performance improvement through 5S in small scale industry: a case study’, International Journal of Modern
Engineering Research (IJMER), Vol. 3, No. 3, pp.1654–1660.
[23] Ramesh, K., Muruganantham, V.R. and Arun kumar, N.R. (2014) ‘5S implementation studies in biomass processing unit’, International Journal of Innovative
Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp.312–318.
[24] Shahryar Sorooshian, Meysam Salimi, Shanthi Bavani, Hasti Aminattaheri, Experience of 5S Implementation, Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 8(7),
2012, 3855-3859.
[25] Derya Sevim Korkut, Nevzat Cakıcıer, E.Seda Erdinler, Göksel Ulay and Ahmet Muhlis Dogan, 5S activities and its application at a sample company, African
Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 8 (8), 20 April, 2009, 1720-1728.
[26] J. Michalska, D. Szewieczek, The 5S methodology as a tool for improving the organisation, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing
Engineering, Volume 24(2), October 2007, 211-214.
[27] ArashGhodrati, NorzimaZulkifli, The Impact of 5S Implementation on Industrial Organizations’ Performance, International Journal of Business and
Management Invention, vol.2(3), 2013, 43-49.
[28] Jose H. Ablanedo-Rosas, Bahram Alidaee, Juan Carlos Moreno and Javier Urbina Quality improvement supported by the 5S, an empirical case study of
Mexican organisations, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 48 (23), 1 December 2010, 7063–7087.
[29] Prof. S. B. Khedkar, Prof. R. D. Thakre, Prof. Y. V. Mahantare, Mr. Ravi Gondne, Studyof Implementing 5S Techniques in Plastic Moulding , International
Journal of Modern Engineering Research, Vol.2 (5), Sep.-Oct. 2012, 3653-3656.
[30] Ravinder Kumar Panchal, Improving the organization through 5S methodology, Proceedings of the National Conference on Trends and Advances in
Mechanical Engineering, YMCA University of Science & Technology, Faridabad, Haryana, Oct 19- 20, 2012.
[31] Marko Milosevic , Ivan Macuzic , Petar Todorovic , Marko Djapan , Evanthia Giagloglou , jordje Vuckovic, Implementation of 5S system as a factor for
improving the quality management, 7th International Quality Conference, Center for Quality, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kragujevac May 24-2013.
[32] HarshaLingareddy, G.Sahitya Reddy, K.Jagadeshwar, 5S as a tool and strategy for improving the work place, International Journal of Advanced Engineering
Technology, Vol.4(2),April-June, 2013, 28- 30.
[33] R.T. Salunkhe, G.S. Kamble, Prasad Malage, Inventory Control and Spare Part Management through 5S, KANBAN and Kaizen at ABC Industry, Journal of
Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSRJMCE), 43-47.
[34] Gheorghe dulhai, the 5S strategy for continuous improvement of the manufacturing process in autocar exhaust, Journal of Management & Marketing, Vol.
3(4), 2008.

Implementation of 5S Tools in Bottling Industry To Improvement of Productivity

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Implementation of 5S Tools in Bottling Industry To Improvement of Productivity

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

8 X October 2020

Implementation of 5S Tools in Bottling Industry to

B. 5 Pillars are as follows

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 734

Figure 1 Diagram of 5S principles

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 735

II. LITRATURE SURVEY

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 736

A. Summation of composing diagram

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 737

Data collection before

Data collection after

Result & Discussion

V. DATA COLLECTION & ANALYSIS

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 738

C. Methodology Before 5s Execution

Rejections due to damaged bottles

Rejections due to other defects

Estimation of total rejections

Final goods produced

Estimating the overall efficiency

Estimating the overall efficiency

D. Methodology After 5s Execution

The overall production of the bottles in the

Rejection of bottles due to loose cap (LC)

Rejection of bottles due to level pasting (LP)

The overall production of the bottles in the

Rejection of bottles due to loose cap (LC)

Rejection of bottles due to level pasting (LP)

Rejections due to damaged bottles

Rejections due to other defects

Final goods produced excluding rejections

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 739

Study of plant creation of packaging area when execution of 5s

Production (nos.) before 5s implementation(11/01/2020 – 11560 13620 12625 13820 12586

The below table 5 shows the Rejections due to damaged bottles.

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 740

The below table 7 show the Total rejections.

VI. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Figure 5 shows the total production before and after implementation of 5s

REJECTION DUE TO LOOSE CAP

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 741

REJECTION DUE TO LEVEL PASTING

0 Rejection (nos.) due to

REJECTION DUE TO DAMAGED BOTTLE

REJECTION DUE TO OTHER DEFECTS

Figure 9 the rejection to other defects before and after implementation of 5s

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 742

Figure 10 shows the total rejections before and after implementation of 5s

FINAL GOODS PRODUCED

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 743

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 744

Вам также может понравиться