Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ABSTRACT
The article presents a new analytical method for blocking probability
determination in the interface of the UMTS network. In our consideration we use
a modified model of full-availability group with multi-rate traffic. The proposed
scheme is applicable for cost-effective IuB resource management in 3G mobile
networks and can be easily applied to network capacity calculations.
HSDPA
IuB
RNC
Node B Free
resources
Core network
R99
UE Uu
CS 12.2
IuB
CS 64
RNC
PS 128/64
Node B
Uu
IuB RNC
Node B a) Node B
HSDPA
the access part (UTRAN) has a particular
significance, i.e. the radio interface between the user
R99
and NodeB and the IuB connections between NodeB CS 12.2
and RNC. The issues pertaining to radio interface CS 64
dimensioning are widely discussed in the subject PS 128/64
literature, for example in earlier works of the
authors [5-8,12-14,21], whereas those dealing with
dimensioning of the IuB interface have not been
raised so far. IuB RNC
A2 t 2 A2 t 2
A1 t1 A1 t1 A1 t1
n −1 n n +1 n+2
I I I
y1 ( n )t1 y1 ( n + 1)t1 y1 ( n + 2 )t1
The modification of the serviced process shown in On the basis of the above considerations, the
Fig. 4 results in a transformation in the occupancy algorithm of blocking probability calculations in IuB
distribution (Eq. (3)) into the generalized Kaufman- may be written as follows:
Roberts distribution: 1. Calculation of offered traffic load Ai of class i
(Eq. (1)).
M
2. Determination of the value of tBBU as the greatest
n[ Pn ]V = ∑ Ai ti σ i (n − ti )[ Pn −ti ]V , (9)
common divisor (Eq. (2))
i =1
3. Designation of the value of ti as the integer number of
where σi(n) is the conditional state-passage- demanded resources by class i calls (Eq. (4))
probability between adjacent states of the process. In 4. Calculation of state probabilities [Pn]V in FAG
the considered system shown in Fig. 4, the parameter (Eq. (3)).
σi(n) can be determined in the following way: 5. Determination of reverse transition rates yiI(n) in the
FAG (Eq. (6)).
1 for i ∈ S n ≤ N − ti , 6. Designation of the function G(n) for yiI(n) in FAG
(Eq. (7)).
σi (n) = 0 for i ∈ S n > N − ti , (10)
7. Determination of state N in FAG, in which condition
1 for i ∉ S n ≤V,
(8) is fulfilled.
8. Calculation of the occupancy distribution [Pn]V in the
where S is a set of constrained traffic classes. modified Markov chain (Eqs. (9) and (10)).
The parameter σi(n) has to be also considered in the 9. Determination of reverse transition rates yiII(n) in the
reverse transition rates of a class i service stream modified distribution ( Eq. (11)).
outgoing from state n (Fig 4): 10. Designation of the function G(N) for yiII(n) in the
modified distribution (Eq. (12)).
A σ (n − ti )[ Pn −ti ]V /[ Pn ]V for n ≤ V , 11. Checking condition (8) for state N in the modified
yiII (n) = i i distribution
0 for n > V .
12. If the condition (8) is not fulfilled, then we check the
(11)
value of N and if N∈[1;V-1], we adopt N (N=N±1)
The value of yiII(n) parameter, in a given state of the and proceed to step 8.
group, forms the basis of the method of the 13. If the condition (8) is fulfilled, then we determine the
occupancy distribution calculation in the group values of blocking probabilities for all traffic classes
presented in Fig. 4. in the modified distribution (Eq. (13)).
The function G(n) for the modified one-dimensional
Markov chain can be determined as follows: 4 NUMERICAL EXAMPLES
The proposed analytical model of the IuB interface is
M y II (n)ti an approximate one. Thus, the results of the
G (n) = ∑i =1 i
for i ∈ S ,
(12) analytical calculations of the IuB were compared
0 for i ∉ S . with the results of the simulation experiments. In the
study we compare the results obtained for both
In the determination of the blocking probability of organization schemes of the IuB interface.
calls of individual traffic classes serviced in the The study was carried out for users demanding a set
system shown in Fig. 4, one has to take into of services with encapsulation in ATM layer in the
consideration the differences in the availability of the downlink direction (Tab. 1):
group for different traffic classes. Therefore, we get: o t1 = 12.2 x 1.4 ≃ 18 kbps = 18 BBUs,
o t2 = 64 x 1.25 ≃ 80 kbps = 80 BBUs,
V
∑ [ Pn ]V for i ∈ S , o t3 = 64 x 1.3 ≃ 84 kbps = 84 BBUs,
n = N −t +1
Ei = V i (13)
o t4 = 384 x 1.3 ≃ 500 kbps = 500 BBUs (HSDPA).
∑ [P ] for i ∉ S .
n =V −t +1 n V We assume that the amount of resources demanded
i
for HSDPA traffic (class 4) in the IuB interface is
Figure 6: Blocking probability for HSDPA traffic Figure 8: Blocking probability for all traffic classes
class presented in Tab. 1 (t4=500 BBUs, V=5,360 BBUs) presented in Tab. 1 (G=8,000 BBUs and VIuB=13,360 BBUs)
equal to 500 BBUs. This value is assumed by mobile In this case, access to the resources was limited for
network operator and determines the amount of R99 traffic classes whereas for HSDPA classes was
resources which can be assigned to HSDPA user unconstrained. Additionally, it was assumed in this
with predefined probability. model that the limitation G for release R99 was equal
In the first step of our evaluation we discuss the to 8 Mbps (8,000 BBUs). Figures 7 and 8 show the
influence of the organization schemes on the results obtained for the traffic classes presented in
blocking probabilities for the R99 and HSDPA traffic Tab 1.
classes. Figure 7 shows the blocking probabilities for the IuB
Additionally, it was assumed that: interface with unconstrained access to resources. The
o tBBU is equal to 1 kbps, blocking probabilities for the IuB interface with
o a physical capacity of IuB in the downlink constrained access to resources for R99 traffic
direction is equal to VIuB= 13,36 Mbps classes to 8,000 BBUs and unconstrained access to
(13,360 BBUs), resources for HSDPA traffic class are shown
o the services were demanded in the following in Fig. 8. Comparing the results presented in Figs. 7
proportions: A1t1 : A2t2 : A3t3 : A4t4=1:1:1:2. and 8 we can note that the limitation of access to
In the first scenario (Fig. 2a) we assume that resources causes an increase in the value of blocking
dedicated links carried R99 and HSDPA traffic. probability of the constrained traffic classes.
Figures 5 and 6 present blocking probabilities for the Comparing the results presented in Figs. 5-8 for both
IuB interface that consists of two separated links: IuB organization schemes we may observe that the
the first link carries only R99 traffic classes and has lowest values of blocking probabilities for R99
the capacity equal to 8,000 BBUs, whereas the traffic classes can be obtained in the case of the link
second link carries only HSDPA traffic and has the which services HSDPA and R99 traffic classes on
capacity equal to 5,360 BBUs. common resources (Fig. 7). The lowest value of the
In the second scenario (Fig. 2b) we assumed that all blocking probability for HSDPA traffic class was
traffic classes were serviced with common resources. obtained for the second organization scheme of IuB