Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 4

Catarman National High School

TMEA Data Gathering Template


CY 2019, Quarter 3 (First Grading Data)

Name of Adviser: RUEL E. FLORANO Advisory Class: GRADE 12: DIAMOND


IMPORTANT: Must be submitted to the Department Head 15 days after the quarterly exam with MOVs.
A. ACCESS B. QUALITY
Male 26 Mean Percentage Score(MPS)
1 Enrolment(August) Female 22 Subject Taught MPS(%)
Total 48 15 Subject 1 GENERAL MATHEMATICS 58.27%
Male
21
2 Enrolled School-Age Children Female 20 Average 58.27%
Total 41 Number of Students Fail (Based
Subject 1 Subject 2
Male NA on Classrecord)
Students enrolled in school
3 since Grade 7 (For Female NA 16 Male 22
Grade 10 Only) Total NA Female 13
Male NA Total 35
Completers (For Grade 10 Female NA Total
4 Least Learned Competency
Only)
Total NA (Based on Item Analysis) 0
Male 0 Subject: GENERAL MATHEMATICS
5 Dropouts Female 0
Total 0
Male 0
Students at Risk of Dropping
6 Female 0
Out (SARDO)
Total 0
Male 0 17
7 SARDO Saved Female 0
Total 0
Male 0
Learners No Longer in 0
8 Female
School(NLS)
Total 0
Male 0
9 Repeaters Female 0
Total 0
Male 25 Total
Learners with 100% 18 Classes with below 100% Competency coverage (Based on
Curriculum Guide)
10 Female 22 12
attendance
Total 47 Classes implementing contextualized Curriculum(ref: Total
19 Lesson Plan)
Male 0 0
Learners with incidence of Female 0 Learners per Quarterly Assessment(Mastery Level)
11
Tardiness
Total 0 Subject: GENERAL MATHEMATICS Subject 1 Subject 2

Male 1 Mastery(96-100%) 1
Learners with incidence of 0
12 Female Closely Approx. Mastery(86-95%) 24
Habitual Absenteeism 20
Total 1 Moving Towards Mastery(66-85%) 116
Sev.Wasted Male 1 Average Mastery (35-65%) 269
Sev. Wasted Female 0 Low(15-34%) 30
Total 1 Very Low(5-14%)
Wasted Male 2 Absolutely No Mastery(0-4%)
Wasted Female 2
Number of Promoted Total
Total 2
21
Normal Male 22 Male
Learners per Nutritional Status Female
13 Normal Female 18
Category (BMI)
Total 40 Reading Level(For Filipino/English Teachers Only)
Overweight Male 1 Male 0
Overweight Female 0 Non-Reader Female 0
Total 1 Total 0
Obese Male 0 Male 0
Obese Female 0 Frustration Female 0
Total 0 22 Total 0
Sev. Stunred Male 2 Male 0
Sev. Stunted Female 4 Instructional Female 0
Total 6 Total 0
Stunted Male 5 Male 0
Stunted Female 5 Independent Female 0
0
14 Learners per Nutritional Status
Total 10 Total
Category (Height for Age) Normal Male 16 Number of Non-Numerates(For Math Teachers Only)
Normal Female 13 Male 0
Total 29 Female 0
23
Tall Male 0 Total 0
Tall Female 0
23

Total 0
C. GOVERNANCE
No. of Instructional Supervision conducted by YES
24 41 Do you have a very satisfactory Records
School Head/Department Head Management? NO
Do you utilized IPPD/SPPD/RPMS YES No. of Technical Assistance provided by SH/DH/MT on:
25
Development Plan? Classroom Management Implementation
YES 42 Curriculum Implementation
26 Are you trained on K to 12 Implementation?
Teaching-Learning Assessment
Access to LRMDS
27 Number of SLAC Session attended
43 Number of teacher's absences for the quarter 0
28 Number of INSET attended
Number of recognized Effective Practices
In Good Condition 44 documented and replicated within the school or
29 Status of Classroom shared within the Division.
For Repair
Condemnable Number of Learners with Incidence of Teenage
45 Pregnancy 0
Inside the room
30 No. of Comfort Room utilized
46 Number of Parents/Guardians attended during
Outside the room
18
31 No. of Armchairs 48 meetings and assemblies.
32 No. of Desks 5 Classroom repaint Cash 900
47 Stakeholder's Donation
33 No. of Monoblock chairs(plastic) 0 Man-hours
34 No. of Teacher's Table & Chair 1 Number of awards received: Total
35 No. of functional library School level
36 No. of functional science laboratory Division Level
Teacher
37 No. of functional ICT laboratory Regional Level
38 No. of functional e-Classroom 48 National Level
Outstanding (O) School level
Very Satisfactory(VS) Division Level
Student
39 Teacher's IPCRF Rating Satisfactory (S) Regional Level
Unsatisfactory (U) National Level
Poor (P) Programs & Projects Implemented(for Coordinators Only)
Do you have a very satisfactory Classroom 49 Name of Program:
40
Management? Funds Allocated: Funds Utilized:
D. OTHER DATA
Male 0 Male
50 No. Edited learners in LIS Female 0 53 Balik-Aral Female
Total 0 Total
Male 0 Male
No. of Learners Transferred-In
51
in LIS Female 0 54 CCT/4Ps Recipient Female
Total 0 Total
Male 0 Number of trainings attended
52 No. of Learners Transferred- Female 0 55 Name of latest training:
Out in LIS
Total 0

COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS:

This form can be used as reference or means of verification(MOVs) in accomplishing relevant information in the RPMS-IPCRF of
teachers.

I hereby certify that the above data are true and correct basedon my knowledge and understanding.

Prepared by: Checked & Verified by:


RUEL E. FLORANO GEMMA A. TAN
Name & Signature of Adviser Name & Signature of Department Head
Date Submitted:_________________
Noted:

MA. HELENA V. ALUMBRES, Ph D., LlB


Secondary School Principal IV
Catarman National High School
TMEA Data Gathering Template
CY 2018, Quarter 4(Second Grading Data)

Name of Subject Teacher:________________________________Subject Taught:_______________________________

IMPORTANT: Should be submitted to the Department Head 15 days after the quarterly exam with MOVs.
A. ACCESS B. QUALITY
Mean Percentage Score(MPS)
1 Subject Taught MPS(%)
15 Subject 1
Subject 2
2 Average
Number of Students Failed
(Based on Classrecord)
3 16 Male
Female
Total
4 Least Learned Competency Total
(Based on Item Analysis)
1
5

2
6

17 3
7

4
8

5
9

Classes with below 100% Competency Total


18 coverage (Based on Curriculum Guide)
10
Classes implementing contextualized Total
19
Curriculum(ref: Lesson Plan)
11 Learners per Quarterly Assessment(Mastery Level)
Subject:
Mastery(96-100%)
12 Closely Approx. Mastery(86-95%)
20 Moving Towards Mastery(66-85%)
Average Mastery (35-65%)
Low(15-34%)
Very Low(5-14%)
Absolutely No Mastery(0-4%)

21
13
Reading Level(For Filipino/English Teachers Only)
Male
Non-Reader Female
Total
Male
Frustration Female
22 Total
Male
Instructional Female
Total
Male
Independent Female
14 Total
Number of Non-Numerates(For Math Teachers Only)
Male
23 Female
Total
C. GOVERNANCE
No. of Instructional Supervision
Number of Teachers w/ very
24 conducted by School 0 0 0 41
satisfactory Records Management?
Head/Department Head
No. of Technical Assistance provided by SH/DH/MT on:
25 No. of teachers utilized IPPD/SPPD/RPMS
Development Plan? 6 5 11
Classroom Management Implementation 0 0 0
42 Curriculum Implementation 0 0 0
26 No. of teachers trained on K to 12
Implementation? 9 12 21+4
Teaching-Learning Assessment 0 0 0
Access to LRMDS 0 0 0
27 Number of SLAC Session attended 2 1 33
43 Number of teacher's absences for the quarter 1 3 4
28 Number of INSET attended 0 0 0
Number of recognized Effective Practices
In Good Condition 13 13 26 44 documented and replicated within the school 0 0 ### 0
or shared within the Division.
29 Status of Classroom For Repair 2 0 2
Condemnable 0 0 0 Number of Learners with Incidence of
45 Teenage Pregnancy 3 1 4
Inside the room 7 2 9
30 No. of Comfort Room
Outside the room 8
46 Number of Parents/Guardians attended
during meetings and assemblies. 227 120 347
31 No. of Armchairs 616 575 1191
32 No. of Desks 0 7 7 Cash
47 Stakeholder's Donation
33 No. of Monoblock chairs(plastic) 10 29 39 Man-hours 8
34 No. of Teacher's Table & Chair 12 12 24 Number of awards received: Total
35 No. of functional library 1 1 School level 0 0 0
36 No. of functional science laboratory 0 0 Division Level 1 0 1
Teacher
37 No. of functional ICT laboratory 1 1 Regional Level 0 0 0
38 No. of functional e-Classroom 0 0 48 National Level 0 0 0
Outstanding(O) 3 1 4 School level 1 0 1
VSatisfactory(VS) 12 11 23 Division Level 0 0 0
Student
39 Teacher's IPCRF Rating Satisfactory(S) 0 0 0 Regional Level 0 0 0
Unsatisfactory(U) 0 0 0 National Level 0 0 0
Poor(P) 0 0 0 Programs & Projects Implemented(for Coordinators Only)
No. of teachers w/ very satisfactory 49 Name of Program:
40 Classroom Management? 6 8 14
Funds Allocated: Funds Utilized:
D. OTHER DATA
Accomplished of SIP/AIP
Implementation based on
SMEA Result Target

56
Access
Quality & Relevance
Governance

COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS:

This form can be used as reference or means of verification(MOVs) in accomplishing relevant information in the RPMS-IPCRF of
teachers and employees.

I hereby certify that the above data are true and correct based on my knowledge and understanding.

Prepared by: Checked & Verified by:

Name & Signature of Grade Level Chair Name & Signature of M & E Coordinator
Date Submitted:_________________
Noted:

MA. HELENA V. ALUMBRES, Ph D., Ll B


Secondary School Principal IV

Вам также может понравиться