Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Plaintiff,
-against
(PRO SE)
Defendants.
granted.
DISCUSSION
The Order gave Onyema until November 15, 2010 to replead his
Case 1:08-cv-04581-LTS -THK Document 97 Filed 01/11/11 Page 2 of 7
further notice." Onyema did not file his Amended Answer and
PIa iff now seeks the dismiss of the counterclaim arguing (1)
motion.
untimely, in view of fact that (1) it was late by only one day,
its me s.
complaint 1 lly." Roth v. Jennings, 489 F.3d 499, 510 (2d Cir.
2007) (quot Gregory v. Daly, 243 F. 687, 691 (2d Cir. 2001));
however, they are not exempt from the usual pleading requirements.
Twombly, 550 U.S. 544,127 S. Ct. 1955 (2007), adds a "plaus lity
, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009); see also Harris v. Mills, 572
F.3d 66, 72 (2d Cir. 2009); Bilello v. J.P. Morgan Chase Ret. Plan,
No. 07 Civ. 7379 (DLC), 2009 WL 2461005, at *5-6 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 12,
Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. at 1949; see also Harris, 372 F.3d at 72.
1950.
community.
4
Case 1:08-cv-04581-LTS -THK Document 97 Filed 01/11/11 Page 5 of 7
~==== Gargiulo v. Forster & Garbus Esgs., 651 F. Supp. 2d 188, 192
(S.D.N.Y. 2009);
the liti ion./I Lacher v. Engel, 33 A.D.3d 10, 13, 817 N.Y.S.2d
37, 40 (1st ' t 2006) (citing Youmans v. Smith, 153 N.Y. 214,
CONCLUSION
ections. See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a) and (d). Such objections
shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court, with extra copies
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155, 106 S. Ct. 466, 475 (1985); Frank
6
Case 1:08-cv-04581-LTS -THK Document 97 Filed 01/11/11 Page 7 of 7
Respectfully Submitted,
THEODORE H. KATZ
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE