Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 17

Can the new NEP 2020 reform the Indian

Education System?

Aptly quoted, that Indian Education System can be defined as, “​It's several
year-long processes of converting a dreamer kid into the confused and
unemployable youngster​”
After a long wait of 34 years, the Indian education system gets an outhaul. It is
often said that to change a country, change the education system of that
country. And now it has started.

On 31 July, the much-awaited National Education Policy (NEP) was


announced by HRD Minister Ramesh Nishank and I&B Minister Prakash
Javadekar after the Union Cabinet approved the new policy earlier in the day.

The education system of India, we all know how broken the system of
education in our country has become. It teaches us rote learning. It teaches
us to memorize whatever is being taught blindly. In exams, students are
expected to photocopy whatever the teacher says or whatever is written in the
books because these exams are everything. You only have to score marks,
irrespective of whether you understand anything or not.

And to bring these useless marks, students study even 12 hours a day. All
their free time, their hobbies and their playtimes are destroyed. Their whole
life is spent struggling this way, and the pressure results in this to push kids
into depression. Some even suicide and some who walk out realize that the
skills needed by them in real life, we're never really taught!!!
Is this expected from our education system? Then what about other countries,
do they follow the same?

Let's see the education system of a country that is always viewed at the top
whenever we talk about education.

In this country, the education system of Singapore, 20% of the Singaporean


government expenditure is spent only on education. This escalates the
facilities and infrastructure of schools. India has a student-teacher ratio of
about 25 students per teacher, but in Singapore, it is almost half, i.e., 12
students per teacher.

According to the PISA ranking, which tests students of a country and judges
them on subjects like mathematics, science, and reading, Singapore has
always been the topper every year. On the other hand, India last attempted
this test in 2009 and got 73 out of 74.

About 97% of the students are studying from coaching centers, according to a
2008 report. The exciting thing is that Singapore has a compulsory education
after 1996. In that education, students are divided into streams at an early
age, which affects students' equality.

This is the reason that ​the ​Singaporean government removed the streaming
system and started SSB, i.e., Subject Based Banding, which allows students
to choose the specific level category (G1, G2, G3) in a particular subject. This
helped students study the remaining issues with other students, which will not
restrict the students' mindset.

Can we learn from these developed countries?


This is excellent news that our government has brought in; they have
addressed almost all the significant criticism points in their new policy and
brought a revolutionary change in the Indian education system.

● Subjects' flexibility​: One of the first and significant criticisms is


that our educational system tries to fit the students into three
categories after class 10. If someone has the interest in any
other subject, he couldn't do anything. But now students have the
facility to choose their topic by themselves. After implementing
this policy, the 90's kids may feel jealous as they didn't have that
much flexibility.

● 5+3+3+4 Education system​: Govt. replaced the existing 10+2


academic structure to 5+3+3+4 system now. It has become more
similar to the education system of the western developed
countries.
Foundational stage​: Students in the age group of 3-8 years will be part of the
foundational step. This stage will be split into two:
● Three years of playschool and two years in primary school
(grades 1 and 2).
Preparatory Schooling Stage​: For children between 8-11 years of age in
grades 3 to 5. There will be a greater emphasis on experiential learning
across the sciences, mathematics, arts, social sciences, and humanities.

Middle school​: For students between 11-14 years in grades 6 to 8. The thrust
for this​ ​the​ ​level will be to have a subject-oriented pedagogical learning style.

Secondary level​: The final stage is for students between 14-18 years. This
stage is again split into two sub-stages: covering grades 9 and 10 in one
cohort and 11 and 12 in another.

● Evaluation​: Assessments will be done not only by the teachers,


but the students will also self-evaluate themselves. The rest of
the students in the class will also evaluate a particular student.
This step is beneficial because self-assessment is one of the
most com
mon aspects of critical thinking.

● Government Expenditure​: The repeated criticism against the


Indian education system is that the government should spend
more on education, like in other developed countries, as we have
seen Singapore's example. The govt. has decided that at least
6% of the GDP will now be spent on education. Right now it is
3%, which is insufficient as compared to other developed
countries. And 6% of GDP target is excellent in the first step.
● Rote Learning​: The problem that no one can forget is rote
learning in the Indian education system. The government said
that it would try and change this as well. Exams would be
designed as they don't require much memorization or rote
learning. But how exactly this will be achieved is not mentioned.

Changes after school education

Apart from setting a target to increase the Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER) in
higher education from 26.3% to 50%, some other changes are made in the
college education system.
● Multiple Entry-Exit Systems with Appropriate Certifications: While
the three-year traditional BA and BSc degrees will continue, the
new policy has introduced a four-year multidisciplinary Bachelor's
program and an option to exit and enter the course at any time.

If a student exits the program after


Year 1: they will receive a vocational certificate
Year 2: an Advanced Diploma
Year 3: Bachelor's degree
Year 4: Bachelor's degree with research.
Students can resume the course after a specified period prescribed by the
Higher Education Commission.

After a four-year degree program, a student can directly do a year of Master's


degree and then proceed for the PhD program. The MPhil program is being
discontinued.

● Credit Transfer and Academic Bank of Credit​: Students will


have an academic bank of credit. If he/she takes a break in the
third year for a fixed period prescribed by the Higher Education
Commission, he/she can utilize the credits stored in the digital
locker whenever they wish to resume. This approach is
instrumental and already exists in most of the developed
countries.

● Permission to set up ​the ​top 100 foreign institutes ​has​ been


permitted to set up their campuses with India.
● Focus on Vocational Education System​: Govt. has said that it
would be integrated into all schools and higher educational
institutions in a phased manner in the next ten years. The aim for
the next five years, 50% of students in schools and higher
education institutions will have exposure to the vocational
education system.

● Teachers​: A common national professional standard will be set


for the entire teacher by 2022. A four-year integrated BA degree
would be the minimum qualification required to become a teacher
by 2030.

These are some points that will be very beneficial to the Indian Education
System, but some issues are also most criticized. What are they?

Language​: The education of the child until the 5th grade should be in-home
language, mother language, and regional language. This is not compulsory,
but it will force the schools not to teach in English but teach in the local
language as this would restrict the movement of the people from one state to
another. Why is this criticized so much?

Because English is essential at an international level and it is becoming


necessary to learn English in every country. It is required to do any work at
the national level.

Anti-Democratic​: Students and teachers' bodies have criticized this policy of


being anti-democratic. Some parties have also criticized it. They said that the
states were not consulted before making this policy as education is a
concurrent subject that comes under both the Centre as well as the state list.

Theoretical​: This policy changes things theoretically. But to implement them


practically in real life will be a very long, complicated process because as we
have seen conditions in schools that lack proper teachers and adequate
infrastructures.

In conclusion, the Indian education system must change for the better. It must
give the students equal opportunities to shine better in the future. We need to
let go of the old and traditional ways and enhance the teaching standards to
create a better world.

Вам также может понравиться