Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 1:25 AM
To:
Cc:
Subject: Re: House Republican Caucus Reorganization - Updated Information
Matt,
I completely agree with you. We are the party that supports all discussions and differing opinions prior to the
vote, however once the vote takes place and the rules are adopted, we are also the party that lives by the rules
that are adopted by the vote, win or lose.
The rules of the CDC, State Health Dept and City of Bismarck are very clear and concise. Wear a mask if
unable to maintain 6 feet.
We are the party of rules, we live with Roberts Rules, House Rules, Joint Rules, not because we like them all or
support them all, but because they are the rules of the Assembly, and have passed a vote.
You can have your opinion on masks, on herd immunity, on the virus in general, however the rules are the rules
and require a simple majority to put in place with the expectation that everyone follow them. If you don’t like
them, make a motion to change them and then live by the rules.
No shaming, no bullying, no threats of not wearing, no confrontations, no bickering. The rules are the rules until
the majority changes them.
Thanks,
Todd
Just a reminder, we’re supposed to be from the party that supports differing opinions and
encourages discussion. We can have valuable conversations without lobbing personal attacks. At
the end of the day we are on the same team. I’m looking forward to seeing you all this week
whether it’s behind a mask or through zoom!
-Matt
If attended this meeting means we will encounter baseless guilt from our leadership, then I
simply ask that you, as a leader, attend remotely.
Furthermore, history is replete with Patriots and Republicans who resist baseless laws and
soft tyranny. Again. I would be more than happy to share my reasons for that as well.
And the no mask shaming begins. That’s right, we’re uncaring, selfish, and inconsiderate.
Thank you Ms. Caucus Chair. I never said anything derogatory about people who want to
wear masks and I never demanded that they be in close proximity to me. I was called
yesterday and asked if I would mind showing up early to avoid contact with the crowd. I
willingly accepted that suggestion and plan to do so but to read these comments, it appears
someone is upset that we don’t all have the same view on this issue.
As for the comments about not following laws and implying we are hypocrites, the truth is
the “law” is a strong recommendation at best with no penalty and that was done on
purpose. I listened to the whole discussion of the Bismarck City Council and the ordinance
would not have gotten the votes needed with a penalty in place or without some exceptions
added.
I sent my email yesterday to avoid any confrontation at the meeting. I wanted to have the
discussion before Wednesday night. I am content with the option provided and will
accommodate the suggested option but now I am being criticized and shamed by
leadership.
Thanks!
Good Morning!
I just wanted to send a follow up to my email from Sunday. Obviously we've heard from
some of our caucus members and I just want to clarify what will be acceptable at our
meeting tomorrow evening.
There have been some comments about the fact that the vote that we took as a Caucus on
October 21st was to allow those who weren't comfortable in a mask-free environment to
stay at home. While we did make accommodations for those who didn't feel comfortable,
we never discussed having a mask-free environment. What's more, since that vote the law
in Bismarck has changed. It is very troubling that some legislators who are willing to make
laws that they expect others to live under, find it so easy to disregard the laws made by
other duly-elected lawmakers in our state. You can disagree on whether masks work or
not, but the current law states they are required.
That being said, the Caucus will be following the CDC guidelines which allow for masks to
be removed when a person is 6 feet or more from others. For those who are troubled by
wearing a mask, we ask that you arrive early and find a seat separate from others at which
point you can remove your mask. We will expect you to wear a mask when you are moving
about the room.
I ask those opposed to the masks to consider their legislative colleagues. The majority of
our members fall in the high risk category due to age and underlying conditions. What you
are saying with your "if they're concerned, they can zoom in" comments is that your
preference to not wear a mask and attend in person is more important than the desire of
your friends in the legislature to be able to participate fully and gather with friends they
haven't seen in many months. We have already lost a potential colleague to COVID, and
our caucus members have lost family members. Wearing a mask to move amongst your
friends is an act of respect and caring for their well being regardless of whether you think it
helps stop the spread of COVID.
I hope all those who feel well and safe enough to join us, do. I look forward to seeing each
of you. We will ask you to wear a mask as you move about the room. If you're bothered by
wearing a mask, we ask that you arrive early and find a seat that is at least 6 feet from
others. If you feel like you will be unable to wear a mask at any point, the option to attend
via Zoom is your best option.
I'm looking forward to seeing you all tomorrow, whether it's virtually or in person.
Take care,
Shannon