Huawei - PVsyst Guidelines - V 1.2

PVsyst guidelines
Modelling Huawei inverters in PVsyst
Huawei Technologies Deutschland GmbH
September 2018 v1.2

PVsyst guidelines
Issue and Revision Record

Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Narrative
1.0 25/05/2018 JKH/DR/P SR OD First draft
J/GS
1.1 20/07/2018 GRS/JKH/ SR OD Update after addressing
DR client comments
1.2 11/09/2018 JKH SR OD Update after further client
comments
Disclaimer
This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be
relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its
suitability and prior written authority of RINA Consulting being obtained. RINA Consulting accepts
no responsibility or liability for the consequence of this document being used for a purpose other
than those for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying on the document for such
other purpose will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm his agreement to indemnify RINA
Consulting for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. RINA Consulting accepts no responsibility or
liability for this document to any party other than the person by whom it was commissioned.
As provided for in RINA Consulting’s proposal, to the extent that this report is based on information
supplied by other parties, RINA Consulting accepts no liability for any loss or damage suffered by
the client, whether contractual or tortious stemming from any conclusions based on data supplied
by parties other than RINA Consulting and used by RINA Consulting in preparing this report.
September 2018 │ v1.2

PVsyst guidelines
Contents
1 Introduction................................................................................................................................ 4
2 System configuration................................................................................................................. 7
2.1 Designing the string configuration ................................................................................... 7
2.2 Inputting the string configuration into PVsyst .................................................................. 8
2.3 System warnings ........................................................................................................... 11
2.4 PAN file.......................................................................................................................... 13
2.5 OND file ......................................................................................................................... 14
2.5.1 Main parameters ............................................................................................... 15
2.5.2 Efficiency curve ................................................................................................. 20
2.5.3 Additional parameters ....................................................................................... 22
2.5.4 Output parameters ............................................................................................ 23
3 Shading Scene ........................................................................................................................ 26
4 Detailed losses ........................................................................................................................ 28
4.1 Thermal parameter ........................................................................................................ 28
4.2 Ohmic losses ................................................................................................................. 28
4.3 Module quality – LID – Mismatch .................................................................................. 30
4.4 Soiling loss .................................................................................................................... 32
4.5 IAM Losses .................................................................................................................... 33
4.6 Auxiliaries ...................................................................................................................... 34
4.7 Ageing ........................................................................................................................... 35
4.8 Unavailability ................................................................................................................. 36
5 Miscellaneous tools ................................................................................................................. 38
5.1 Inverter temperature ...................................................................................................... 38
5.2 Power factor .................................................................................................................. 38
5.3 Grid power limitation...................................................................................................... 39
6 Loss calculations outside of PVsyst ........................................................................................ 41
6.1 MPPT loss ..................................................................................................................... 42
6.2 Power factor losses ....................................................................................................... 42
6.3 Grid Power Limitation .................................................................................................... 43
Appendices
A. Minimum cell temperature at the PV plant location
B. Module Layout
C. Glossary
D. Frequently Asked Questions

PVsyst guidelines
1 Introduction
Huawei Technologies Deutschland GmbH (‘Huawei’) has enlisted the services of RINA Consulting
Ltd. (‘RINA’) to produce guidelines for replicating the characteristics of Huawei inverters within the
PV yield modelling software, PVsyst.
Using the datasheet, lab test information, research publications, PVsyst’s own guidance
information and RINA experience, these guidelines will outline how best to convert the available
information into PV yield simulation inputs within PVsyst.
Different inverters require different modelling outputs: central inverters will be modelled differently
from string inverters, which will be modelled differently from micro-inverters. Additionally, every
inverter family and model will have different operational parameters and it is important that these
are modelled correctly in PVsyst to ensure that the benefits of each inverter are correctly mirrored.
RINA will introduce the reader to the method by which PVsyst models Huawei inverters, highlighting
the key parameters/PVsyst inputs that describe the inverter and those which impact the inverter
outputs. The guidelines are expected to be useful across Huawei’s range of inverters. To illustrate
some of the principles in these guidelines, two inverter models are used as examples: the
SUN2000-60KTL-M0 and the SUN2000-100KTL-H1.
The following guidelines relate to PVsyst version 6.70 although the majority of the information
contained within this document can be applied to previous versions. When a project is first created
in PVsyst the following home screen is visible (Figure 1). Various project data need to be
input/uploaded, including the meteorological conditions, details of the site, the site topology, PAN
files and OND files. We have assumed the reader is familiar with these aspects of the basic set-up
of a PVsyst project. Within the input parameters sections on the home screen, the sections that
directly relate to inverters are ‘System’ and ‘Detailed Losses’, highlighted in Figure 1 below. The
‘System’ section will be described in Section 2 and the ‘Detailed Losses’ section will be described
in Section 3.
Once a project is correctly setup in PVsyst, a simulation can take between a few seconds and a
few minutes to run, depending on the project size and complexity. A 100 MWp project simulation
could take 5 – 10 minutes to run, for example. Once a PVsyst simulation is run, the energy yield
forecast report presents a loss diagram (see the example in Figure 2). Some of these losses will
be referred to within this guideline document.
September 2018 │ v1.2 4

PVsyst guidelines
Figure 1: PVsyst grid-connected project home screen

PVsyst guidelines
Figure 2: PVsyst report loss diagram

PVsyst guidelines
2 System configuration
Within the ‘System’ window, the module string configuration must be entered for each sub-array of
the PV plant. Prior to entering the details, the string design must be finalised.
2.1 Designing the string configuration

If you are designing a plant then it is important that the number of modules per string and the
number of strings per MPPT input are chosen such that the following parameters are true:
 The maximum voltage of the module string (Max voltage) does not exceed the maximum
voltage permissible for the module and the inverter (whichever is smallest) using the following
formula:
𝑀𝑎𝑥 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 <= 𝑀𝑎𝑥 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒

From:
𝑉max(𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑒) × 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 = 𝑀𝑎𝑥 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒
Given:
𝛽𝑉𝑜𝑐 × (𝑇𝑚𝑖𝑛 – 𝑆𝑇𝐶)
𝑉max(𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑒) = + 𝑉𝑜𝑐(𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑒)
1000
Where:
𝛽𝑉𝑜𝑐 = Module open circuit voltage temperature coefficient
Tmin = lowest ambient temperature expected (see Appendix A for a way to identify Tmin ).
STC = 25°C standard test temperature
𝑉𝑜𝑐(𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑒) = the module’s open circuit voltage at STC
 The maximum operating current of all strings feeding into one MPPT input (Max current) is not
greater than the inverter maximum input current (unless the specific configuration is confirmed
as permissible by Huawei). The maximum operating current is calculated by the following
formula:
𝑀𝑎𝑥 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 <= 𝑀𝑎𝑥 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡

From:
𝐼𝑚𝑎𝑥 × 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 = 𝑀𝑎𝑥 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡
Given:
𝛽𝐼𝑠𝑐 × (𝑇𝑚𝑎𝑥 – 𝑆𝑇𝐶)

𝐼𝑚𝑎𝑥 = + 𝐼𝑚𝑝𝑝
1000
Where:
𝐼𝑚𝑎𝑥 = Maximum current through one module = Maximum current through one string
𝛽𝐼𝑠𝑐 = Module short circuit current temperature coefficient
Tmax = Highest expected module operating temperature. RINA would expect a maximum
module operating temperature in the range of 55°C to 75°C for days of high irradiation and

PVsyst guidelines
temperatures exceeding 25°C, although the appropriate value will vary depending on project
conditions.
STC = 25°C test temperature
𝐼𝑚𝑝𝑝 = Current at maximum power point for one module
 It is further recommended that the number of strings per inverter does not exceed the maximum
number of strings permitted to be input into the MPPT inputs of the inverter.
– For the SUN2000-60KTL-M0 and the SUN2000-100KTL-H1, Huawei recommends a
maximum of 2 strings per MPPT.
– If a higher DC/AC ratio is required due to design requirements, 3 strings per MPPT could
be connected to the Huawei inverters as long as the voltage limitation is respected and
there is sufficient electrical protection.
Note that recommendations for system sizing, protections, and design philosophy, are outside
of the scope of these guidelines.
2.2 Inputting the string configuration into PVsyst

Once the configuration is finalised, select the PV module (PAN file) and PV inverter (OND file) to
be used in the system using the drop-down lists (Figure 3, orange boxes). If the OND file is not
available in PVsyst’s database, the manufacturer can typically provide a default OND file to add to
the user’s PVsyst component database.
Underneath where the inverter OND file has been selected, in most cases, the ‘Use multi-MPPT’
feature should be unticked, and ‘Nb. of inverters’ should be ticked. (Figure 3, purple dashed boxes).
The one exception to this is where unbalanced configurations such as different module types or
different number of modules per string per MPPT are to be modelled (as described in the
Clarification Note later in this Section).

PVsyst guidelines
Figure 3: ‘System’ home screen: choosing the PAN file and the OND file
The following configuration details could be entered:

 ‘Nb of inverters’ – this is the total number of inverters in the sub-array;
 ‘Mod. in series’ – number of modules connected in series in a string;
 ‘Nbre strings’ – total number of module strings in the sub-array (NOT the number of strings per
inverter).
Clarification Note: unbalanced configurations
Sometimes systems need to be set up with unbalanced configurations. Examples of unbalanced

configurations are when different module types or different numbers of modules per string per
MPPT are to be modelled; in this case, a separate sub-array would be defined per configuration.
 The arrow in Figure 4 shows where the user can set the number of sub-arrays.
 For unbalanced configurations, the ‘Use multi-MPPT feature’ box shall be ticked, which allows
each individual MPPT input to behave as a separate inverter
 Figure 4 shows an example of a system with:
– Two sub-arrays (each with different PV modules)
– One inverter in the system. For the SUN2000-60KTL-M0 and the SUN2000-100KTL-M0
there are six MPPT inputs per inverter, as stated on the datasheets

PVsyst guidelines
– Modules from sub-array 1 are connected to four MPPT inputs and modules from sub-array
2 are connected to the remaining two MPPT inputs
– In ‘Nb of MPPT inputs’, the total number of MPPT inputs per sub-array is entered (four for
sub-array 1 and two for sub-array 2)
 ‘Power sharing’, shown by the yellow box in Figure 4, can be entered to adjust the percentage
of nominal power per MPPT for each subarray. This is advised when the user has had to model
using the ‘multi-MPPT feature’ (as for the above example) but the power input for the MPPT
inputs will be drastically different. In the example in Figure 4:
– Five strings are feeding into two MPPT inputs: one MPPT input will have three strings and
the other MPPT input will have two strings. In this case we want to tell PVsyst that the power
between the two inputs should be shared three-fifths and two-fifths respectively.
– If the ‘Power sharing’ is not clicked and the relevant details entered, then the two MPPT
inputs will be expected to take half of the power each, which would lead to incorrect
evaluation of the inverter overload losses.
We refer the user to the PVsyst online help guidelines1 for more detailed information if an
unbalanced configuration must be modelled.
Figure 4: ‘System’ home screen – unbalanced inputs and multi-MPPT feature
1 http://files.pvsyst.com/help/powersharing.htm

PVsyst guidelines
2.3 System warnings

Sometimes a system warning may arise in the blue box to the bottom right of the “system” screen
(Figure 5). The colour of the text of these warnings indicates its severity: blue text = information
only, orange text = additional yield losses may arise, red text = design error, simulation will not run.
There is a large range of warnings that appear but a few common ones that relate to the inverters
are presented in this section.
Figure 5: ‘System’ home screen – warning box
Warning 1 (blue warning, i.e. information only):
“The array Isc value is greater than the inverter maximum input current
(Info, not significant)”
Explanation: The sum of the short circuit current outputs of each string feeding into each MPPT
input is greater than the inverter maximum current per MPPT (which is stated on the datasheets to
be 22 A for the SUN2000-60KTL-M0 and SUN2000-100KTL-M0 inverters).
Solution: Huawei advises against designing PV plants where the maximum input current per MPPT
exceeds 22 A, although the plant will still operate if the maximum input current is exceeded: the
inverter input circuitry will in this case move the operating point of the PV array along its I-V curve
in order to cap the input current. For any plants utilising such a design, the user should ensure that

PVsyst guidelines
the maximum input current per MPPT does not exceed the value of maximum short circuit current
per MPPT, as stated on the inverter datasheets: 30 A for the SUN2000-60KTL-M0 inverter and 33
A for the SUN2000-100KTL-M0 inverter. If these values are exceeded, the design may be
invalidated by Huawei.
Warning 2 (orange or red warning, depending on severity):
“The array Vmpp at 60°C is lower than the inverter minimum operating
voltage.”
Explanation: As module temperature increases, the DC voltage across a string reduces. This
message indicates that at 60°C cell temperature, the output voltage of the module strings might be
lower than the lowest voltage in the inverter’s MPPT voltage window. Beneath the MPPT voltage
window, the inverter cannot find the maximum power point (MPP) of the PV module inputs. This
would lead to increased under-voltage losses.
Solution: For an orange warning, the user should assess the climatic conditions on the site to
evaluate whether cell temperatures over 60°C are likely to be often reached (refer to Appendix A
for guidance). Alternatively, the user can run the PVsyst simulation and check whether there is
significant under-voltage loss in the loss diagram. The user can then decide whether redesigning
the system would be necessary or beneficial. For a red warning, the system configuration should
be redesigned to increase the number of modules, and therefore the output DC voltage, in a string.
Warning 3 (orange warning):
“The array MPP voltage may not attain the inverter minimum voltage
for full power.”
Explanation: Some inverters have a limit on the operating current that can flow through one MPPT
input. For the SUN2000-60KTL-M0 and the SUN2000-100KTL-M0 this limit is 22 A. If the current
limit is exceeded, the inverter input circuitry will move the operating point of the PV array towards
the high voltage end of its I-V curve in order to cap the input current. This process effectively sets
a minimum operating voltage limit and prevents higher powers from being reached. The above
warning reveals that the operating voltage of the module strings feeding into the inverter is below
the minimum voltage needed to reach nominal inverter power output.
Solution: The user should confirm whether the ensuing inverter losses are acceptable for the PV
plant. If not, the system should be redesigned to reduce the number of modules per module string.
Warning 4 (red warning):
“The array Voc at -10°C is greater than the inverter absolute maximum
input voltage.”

PVsyst guidelines
Explanation: DC voltage output increases with decreasing module temperature. This message
indicates that, at -10°C cell temperature, the total open circuit voltage of each string, which is the
absolute maximum voltage across the string, will exceed the maximum input voltage rating of the
inverter.
Solution: Before considering reducing the number of modules in the string, the user should confirm
whether PV cell temperature is ever expected to reach the PVsyst default minimum temperatures
of -10°C. As cell temperature would always be equal or greater than ambient temperature, if the
ambient temperature of the PV project location does not fall below -10°C, neither will the cell
temperature. Appendix A suggests a way to check the minimum expected temperature at the site
and, if necessary, modify the minimum temperature threshold in PVsyst.
Warning 5 (orange or red warning depending on severity):
“The inverter power is slightly/strongly undersized”
Explanation: This message indicates that the DC:AC ratio is unusually high (with a >0.2% overload
loss for ‘slight’ undersizing and a >3% overload loss for ‘strong’ undersizing). If the PV modules
operate well, there is likely to be some energy loss labelled ‘Inverter loss over nominal inverter
power’ in the final PVsyst loss diagram.
Solution: Huawei have not set a DC:AC ratio limit for system designs, but require that the maximum
voltage across a module string and the maximum current per MPPT input are not exceeded. If an
orange warning is raised, there is no need to rectify the design if the voltage and current limits are
respected. For a red warning, the string configuration will need to be modified.
Some of the warnings may arise from an incorrectly configured PAN or OND file. It is important to
check that both of these are in line with their respective datasheets. Checking the PAN file is outside
the remit of this document, however Section 2.4 looks at the parameters that should feed into an
OND file.
2.4 PAN file

The PAN file is used in PVsyst to describe the PV module parameters. Within the ‘System’ window,
once the module is selected, the ‘Open’ button can be clicked to view and modify the module
modelling parameters (Figure 6). Detailed discussion on PAN file modelling is outside the scope of
this document but can be discussed with the module manufacturer or a technical advisor. Some
key module-related parameters will be discussed elsewhere in this document, but there is one main
check that must be made in the PAN file: in the ‘Basic data’ tab the user should check the
parameters match those on the PV module datasheet. If parameters do not match, the user should
modify the values.

PVsyst guidelines
Figure 6: PAN file – Basic data
2.5 OND file

The OND file is used in PVsyst to describe the inverter parameters. Within the ‘System’ window,
once the inverter is selected, the ‘Open’ button can be clicked to view and modify the inverter
modelling parameters (Figure 7).

PVsyst guidelines
Figure 7: System – Opening the OND file
There are six tabs of data within the OND file: the first four will influence the yield modelling and
we will go through each of these in turn. The last two tabs, ‘Sizes and operation’ and ‘Commercial’,
can be ignored for the purposes of energy yield models with Huawei inverters.
2.5.1 Main parameters

The Main Parameters tab for the Huawei SUN2000-60KTL-M0 default OND file is shown in Figure
8; in this tab, the input-side parameters are displayed on the left, the output-side parameters are

PVsyst guidelines
displayed on the right and the efficiency is displayed at the bottom. The parameters here should
be updated to match information found on the datasheet. The SUN2000-60KTL-M0 datasheet is
shown in Figure 9. We will explain how the datasheet parameters match with those in the OND file
and whether any changes need to be made. Screenshots of the modified ‘Main parameters’ tabs
for the SUN2000-60KTL-M0 and the SUN2000-100KTL-M0 will be shown at the end of this
subsection.
Figure 8: Default OND file – 60 KTL-M0 – main parameters

PVsyst guidelines
Figure 9: SUN2000-60KTL-M0 datasheet: matching datasheet parameters with PVsyst

parameters
Name in Pvsyst
[‘Main Parameters’ tab unless specified otherwise]
Max. efficiency [‘Efficiency curve’ tab]

Euro efficiency [‘Efficiency curve’ tab]
Input side (DC PV field)
Absolute max. PV voltage

Maximum current per MPPT
Min. Voltage for Pnom

Minimum MPP Voltage to Maximum MPP voltage
Nominal MPP Voltage
Number of string inputs [‘Additional parameters’ tab]
Number of MPPT inputs [‘Additional parameters’ tab]
Nominal AC Power
Output side (AC grid)
Maximum AC Power
Grid Voltage
Nominal AC current (only integers allowed in PVsyst)
Maximum AC current (only integers allowed in PVsyst)

Power factor, Cos(Phi) [‘Output parameters’ tab]
All parameters in bold are directly used for the PVsyst yield simulation. The rest of the parameters
are information used for some tools, for example the Nominal MPP Voltage is used in the sizing
tool. The OND file input parameters will change depending on the actual system grid voltage. The
default OND file (Figure 8) is written for a grid voltage of 480 Vac. The modified OND file is shown
for 400 Vac (Figure 10) for ease of explanation, as most parameters on the datasheet are given for
400 Vac. Explanations will be given on how to change OND file parameters when different grid
voltages are required.

PVsyst guidelines
Figure 10: Modified OND file – SUN2000-60KTL-M0 – main parameters for 400 Vac
Explanation of changes
Input side
 ‘Minimum MPP Voltage’, ‘Maximum current per MPPT’, ‘Maximum MPP Voltage’ and ‘Absolute
max. PV Voltage are taken straight from the datasheet;
 ‘Min. Voltage for PNom’ was calculated automatically by PVsyst using the equation:
𝑁𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑃𝑉 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑀𝑃𝑃𝑇

𝑀𝑖𝑛. 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑃𝑛𝑜𝑚 =
𝑀𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑀𝑃𝑃𝑇
where
𝑁𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐴𝐶 𝑃𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 (𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑀𝑃𝑃𝑇) 60,000/6

𝑁𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑃𝑉 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑀𝑃𝑃𝑇 = =
𝐸𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦 0.9815
PVsyst takes the efficiency value from the curves in the next tab (‘Efficiency curve’) and is
taken as the value for the nominal MPP voltage and nominal AC power specified (in this case,
600 V and 60 kVA respectively);
 ‘Power threshold’ is the minimum power needed for the inverter to start-up. The datasheet did
not give this information, so the default value in the OND file can be used. PVsyst recommends
using 0.5% of the inverter nominal power for this value if it is unknown, which is often a
conservative estimate. It is rare for this threshold to result in any significant losses, i.e. the
‘Inverter loss due to power threshold’ in the final PVsyst loss diagram is expected to be 0.0%;
 The contractual specifications do not need to be entered for the purposes of an energy yield
study.
Output side
 The Huawei inverters are tri-phased, as indicated by the ‘3W’ on the datasheets;

PVsyst guidelines
 ‘Frequency’ values are ticked as per datasheet specifications;

 ‘Grid voltage’ depends on site specifications, we are assuming 400 Vac in this case
 ‘Nominal AC power’ and ‘Maximum AC power’ are taken from the datasheet, which is
appropriate for a grid voltage of 400 Vac:
– Note that Huawei has stated that their inverters can operate at a voltage between 0.9x and
1x of their inverter rated grid voltage in order to meet site-specific grid code requirements.
If the inverters do not operate at the rated voltage, their output power must be adjusted
accordingly. For instance, should the inverters be required to operate at 0.9x their rated
voltage (while operating at unity power factor), the maximum output power must be reduced
to 0.9 times that stated on the datasheet, e.g.
 for the SUN2000-60KTL-M0 inverter, the maximum power stated on the datasheet is
66 kVA so the user should enter a maximum AC power of 59.4 kVA, for a power factor
of unity.
 for the SUN2000-100KTL-M0 inverter, the maximum power stated on the datasheet is
105 kVA, so the user should enter a maximum AC power of 94.5 kVA for a power factor
of unity.
 ‘Nominal AC current’ and ‘Maximum AC current’ are taken from the datasheet as appropriate
for 400 V grid voltage.
– For other values of grid voltage, these power values can be calculated automatically by
PVsyst by ticking the boxes next to the values. The calculation that PVsyst performs for tri-
phased systems is:
𝑁𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐴𝐶 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟
𝑁𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐴𝐶 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 =
𝐺𝑟𝑖𝑑 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 ∗ √3
 Huawei has provided measured efficiency data at three voltages, so we can tick ‘Efficiency
defined for 3 voltages’. To check the efficiency data held within the OND file, see Section 2.5.2.
A similarly modified OND file for the SUN2000-100KTL-M0 inverter is shown in Figure 11.

PVsyst guidelines
Figure 11: Modified OND file – SUN2000-100KTL-M0
2.5.2 Efficiency curve

Within this tab, the inverter efficiencies can be defined. Inverter efficiencies can be set in two ways
in PVsyst (Figure 12), with Method 2 being recommended if sufficient information is available:
 Method 1: An automatic profile can be set based on overall inverter efficiencies as found on
the datasheet – this should only be used if no detailed efficiency curves are provided for the
inverters;
 Method 2: For three DC input voltages, efficiency as a function of AC output power can be
entered – this method should be used if efficiency curves at three voltage have been provided
for the inverter model in question.
The steps that must be taken to correctly enter the efficiencies when using Method 2 are described
below.

PVsyst guidelines
Figure 12: OND file – Efficiency curve
Method 1
Method 2
Huawei has provided data for the SUN2000-60KTL-M0 inverter and the SUN2000-100KTL-M0
inverters (Figure 13). For the SUN2000-100KTL-M0 inverter, efficiency curves for five DC input
voltages were given. PVsyst only allows three curves to be inputted, in which case the minimum
(880 Vdc), a midpoint curve (e.g. 1,080 Vdc) and the maximum (1,300 Vdc) should be used. When
obtaining this data from Huawei, it is important that the data pertains to the same inverter model as
installed in your PV plant.
Figure 13: Efficiency data for SUN2000-60KTL-M0 and SUN2000-100KTL-H1 inverters
In order to enter data:

 ‘Input voltage’ - input the three DC voltages you will enter the curves for. For the SUN2000-
60KTL-M0 inverter, these would be: 850 V, 720 V and 600 V (as correct in Figure 12);

PVsyst guidelines
 ‘Display mode’ - As we have received data in the form of Efficiency as a function of output
power, we want to display ‘Efficiency = f (P Out)’ in the Display mode box to check that the
curve looks as we expect;
 ‘Units’ - Ensure the power units are correct for your data (kW in this case);
 Select either High voltage, Medium voltage or Low voltage in the ‘Input Voltage’ box before
manually entering the efficiency values in the ‘Values’ box on the right. The example in Figure
12 is correct for the High voltage curve of the SUN2000-60KTL-M0 inverter. Up to eight data
points can be entered per voltage level.
2.5.3 Additional parameters

The ‘Additional parameters’ tab enables the user to enter details about the inverter’s MPPT
capabilities, whether it is transformerless or not, any master/slave capabilities, information on
internal power consumption and other miscellaneous electrical specifications.
The important features to check are the MPPT specifications. The SUN2000-60KTL-M0 and the
SUN2000-100KTL-M0 inverter both have six MPPT inputs, each able to receive data from two
strings, so check this is reflected correctly as shown in Figure 14.
Figure 14: OND file - Additional parameters
The other settings in this tab can be left at their default settings. Note that the small 2 W night
consumption is unlikely to result in any displayed loss in the PVsyst loss tree that results once a
simulation is run.

PVsyst guidelines
2.5.4 Output parameters

The ‘Output parameters’ tab outlines the power factor capabilities and the behaviour of the inverter
output at high temperatures.
Figure 15: OND file – Output parameters
Power factor
The SUN2000-60KTL-M0 and the SUN2000-100KTL-M0 Huawei inverters can operate at a range
of power factors (PFs): from 0.8 leading to 0.8 lagging as stated in the datasheets. These figures
relate to the Cos(Phi) value between the active and reactive power. To model this feature correctly:
 Ensure that ‘Allows power factor specification’ is ticked then confirm that Cos(Phi) min and max
both read 0.8, as per Figure 15;
 For the Huawei inverters, the nominal AC power should be defined as the active power if a
power factor of between unity and 0.9 leading/lagging is to be used on the plant.
 If a power factor of less than 0.9 is to be used, the nominal AC power should be defined as
apparent power because as soon as a reactive power requirement exists, active power will
reduce but overall, the total apparent power will remain the same.

PVsyst guidelines
Temperature derating
Regarding derating of the output power at high temperatures, some basic information relating to
performance at different temperatures is provided within the inverter datasheets. For more detail,
Huawei has additionally provided RINA with temperature derating data tables for both the
SUN2000-60KTL-M0 and the SUN2000-100KTL-M0 inverters at different DC input voltages.
The information from the datasheet and data tables are compared in Figure 16. Only one set of
derating data can be entered into PVsyst, so the curve for one DC input voltage must be chosen.
Input voltage will depend on design and site-specific conditions, for example string-length or
temperature. Given this variation, it is prudent to consider the most conservative temperature
derating curve for modelling in PVsyst.
Figure 16: Temperature derating curves

Inverter Information Data
Source
60KTL-M0 Datasheet Operation Temperature Range: -25°C to 60°C
Data table
from
Huawei
100KTL-H1 Datasheet Rated AC Active Power: 100,000 W @ 40°C

Max. AC Active Power: 105,000 W@ 35°C
Operation Temperature Range: -25°C to 60°C
Data table
from
Huawei
The following steps should be undertaken to model the temperature derating in PVsyst, with these
settings being displayed in Figure 17:
 Tick ‘Allows overpower’;
 ‘Nom AC Power’ - enter the limiting temperature for the nominal inverter power. In the
SUN2000-60KTL-M0 data table, the temperature limit for 60 kW is not listed, so a linear
interpolation between the temperature limits for 65 kW and 50 kW can be calculated;
 ‘Max AC Power’ - enter the temperature up to which the inverter can operate at its maximum
inverter power;
 Tick ‘High temperature limitation’;
 ‘Power limit abs’ – enter the power at the upper limit of the inverter’s operation temperature
range. This upper limit is 60°C for both inverters;
 ‘Power limit #1’ – enter a data point for a temperature above that entered in the ‘Nom AC Power’
box but below the upper limit of the inverter’s operation temperature. For the SUN2000-60KTL-
M0 inverter, no data point has been provided between these limits therefore, again, a linear
interpolation was made between the 65 kW and 50 kW data points.

PVsyst guidelines
Figure 17: Temperature derating of the SUN2000-60KTL-M0 inverter (left) and the
SUN2000-100KTL-M0 inverter (right)

PVsyst guidelines
3 Shading Scene
The user must model the layout of the plant so that the amount of incident irradiance on the modules
can be accurately estimated. This is done by clicking on the ‘Near Shadings’ button (Figure 18) and
then “Construction/Perspective” (Figure 21), which opens a window in which the shading scene
can be constructed. The PVsyst website contains various sources of help for constructing a shading
scene, a good place to start is here: http://files.pvsyst.com/help/near_shadings_tutorial.htm. We
advise the user that for large projects especially, PV tables can be modelled as representative
blocks, i.e. the exact positioning of strings horizontally relative to each other does not matter as the
correct modelling of inter-row spacing, ground topology, external shading objects and division of
PV tables into individual strings.
Figure 18: Near Shadings

PVsyst guidelines
Figure 19: Near Shadings
Once the scene is constructed, the user must ensure that shadings are considered in the yield
analysis by going to the “Use in simulation” box (Figure 19) and selecting either:
 ‘Linear shadings’ if a module has cells along the length of the module (many thin-film modules),
in this case row-to-row shading will affect all cells equally;
 ‘According to module strings’ for all other modules (including all c-Si modules on the market).
A ‘Fraction for electrical effect’ of 100% implies that when a module string experiences any
shade it ceases production. Presence of bypass diodes, arrangement of modules strings and
distribution of shading may cause this number to be reduced. For utility-scale solar PV utilising
modules with 3 bypass diodes, a value in the range 60%-80% can typically be considered,
subject to the considerations above.

PVsyst guidelines
4 Detailed losses
Within the ‘Detailed Losses’ section (Figure 20) there are eight tabs. We will describe them all in
this section; however the following two tabs govern losses that are directly related to the inverter
type:
 Ohmic Losses;
 Module quality – LID – Mismatch.
Figure 20: Detailed Losses
4.1 Thermal parameter

In the ‘Thermal parameter’ tab (Figure 20, the thermal loss factors should be changed according to
the installation. For most utility-scale ground-mount PV plants, ticking ‘Free’ mounted modules with
air circulation will set suitable default thermal loss factors.
4.2 Ohmic losses

Power is lost as it travels through the cables on the PV plant. This loss is related to the length and
cross-section of the wiring. We would expect the plant to be designed in order to minimise the
length of the cables and optimise the size of the cables. These losses are distributed across the
cables of the plant as follows.
 DC ohmic wiring losses between the modules and the inverters. We expect variation of this loss
depending on the set up of the project:
– String inverter configuration: Losses in string cables from the modules to the inverter.

PVsyst guidelines
– Central inverter configuration: Losses in the string cables from the modules to the DC
combiner box and in the cables from the combiner box to the inverter.
 AC ohmic wiring losses from the inverter to the point of connection. The AC low voltage loss is
the loss in the cables from the inverter to the LV/MV transformer. We expect variation of this
loss depending on the set up of the project:
– String inverter configuration: Losses in cables from the inverter to AC Distribution Board
and from the AC Distribution Board to the LV/MV transformer. Usually they are both placed
away from each other.
– Central inverter configuration: Losses in the cables or busbars from the inverter to the
LV/MV transformer. Central inverters are typically installed in substations or skid containers,
connected to an LV/MV transformer by short run cables or a busbar connection.
Within PVsyst we can account for the ohmic losses within the ‘Ohmic losses’ tab (Figure 21).
Figure 21: Detailed Losses - Ohmic Losses
When a PV plant is designed it is usual for the cable sizes to be calculated such that a specific
power loss at Standard Test Conditions (STC) is not exceeded. The voltage drop within a cable
dictates how much power is lost at a specific current; therefore, it is recommended that the User
ascertain the designed voltage drop at STC for all cables, enabling the calculation of an overall DC
ohmic loss at STC and AC circuit loss at a STC to be entered into the ‘Loss fraction at STC’ boxes
shown in Figure 21.
In RINA’s experience, the range of approximate loss fractions at STC anticipated for utility-scale
plants using string inverters are typically:
 0.3%-1.5% for DC circuit ohmic losses, dependent on the system DC voltage (1,000V or
1,500V; the higher the voltage, the lower the losses) and cable design philosophy.
– 1,000VDC systems: 0.7% to 1.5% using 4mm2 copper cables with strings of an averaged
cable length (positive + negative) of 80m to 250m;
– 1,500VDC systems: 0.3% to 1.3% using 4mm2 copper cables with strings of an averaged
cable length (positive + negative) of 80m to 300m.

PVsyst guidelines
 0.8%-2.5% for AC circuit ohmic losses, highly dependent on the location of the connection point
to the grid and cable specifications.
The more detailed the cable calculation applied, the closer the resulting modelling losses will be to
the proposed plant. Note that temperature plays an important part in the cable calculations and
therefore the final calculated PVsyst inputs will need to be for Standard Test Conditions
temperature (25°C). The above figures allow a range of losses to be estimated for any site at a
high level as an indication.
Central inverter based system designs will typically have more DC cabling and less AC cabling
than a similar string inverter system, resulting in different DC and AC losses. For the central inverter
configuration modelled in the Cowdown project2 our assumption for DC cabling losses was 2.5%
at STC, resulting in a 1.2% final loss for this specific project. For the AC side, we considered that
the low voltage connection to the transformer, via a bus bar connection, should result in a loss of
around 0.1%, with the rest of the AC circuitry contributing a further 0.2% cabling loss.
4.3 Module quality – LID – Mismatch

Figure 22 shows the ‘Module quality – LID – Mismatch’ tab. The module quality and LID sections
are related to PV modules only. The mismatch sections, on the other hand, relate to the string
configuration, which is inverter-dependent.
Figure 22: Detailed Losses – Module quality – LID - Mismatch
Module quality and LID
Module quality is a figure based on the power tolerance or binning range of a PV module. For
example, a 280 W module with an advertised power tolerance of -0/+3%, could be assumed to
have an effective average module quality gain of +1.5%. However, if modules from this family are
sold in 5 W increments, then the power bin size corresponds to 5/280 = 1.8%, therefore modules
with greater than 1.8% tolerance may be sold within the next power bin size. In this case, we would
2 RINA, Huawei SUN2000 Inverter Technical Review and Comparative Study, Phase 2: Case Study Comparison,
v1.4, April 2018

PVsyst guidelines
recommend selecting the mid-point of the smaller of the binning ranges for an effective module
quality gain of 0.9%.
LID is the initial degradation of a module after installation on the field, which tends to be higher than
the annual module degradation rate. For crystalline silicon PV modules, this value can typically
range between 0.7% and 2.0% depending on technology specifics, so should be discussed with
the module manufacturer or a technical advisor
What is mismatch?
Mismatch is the term given to any imbalance in current or voltage across modules in a string or
between strings feeding into one MPPT input. When modules are connected in series to form a
string, the current output of the string will be limited to the current output of the lowest performing
module. When module strings are connected in parallel, voltage mismatch can arise if there is a
difference in voltages across parallel strings running into one MPPT input, which might be caused
by different voltage drops along cables and slightly different voltage outputs from module strings.
Mismatch in the current has been shown to have more of an impact on performance than mismatch
in the voltage.
The mismatch loss output in the final PVsyst yield report is for the first year of operation. It should
be noted that modules will degrade at different rates over time, potentially increasing the mismatch
loss. It is important to consider this variation either in an increased mismatch loss for a specific
future year or as one factor feeding into an annual degradation assumption.
Mismatch value for Huawei inverters
RINA has undertaken a study on mismatch losses based on the current and voltage standard
deviation values from module flash test data from several PV plants. Using these values and the
PVsyst mismatch tool, we have identified typical average values of mismatch that we expect to find
on a PV plant under different conditions, considering variations in system configuration and
assuming that the modules are not current-sorted into strings. This calculated mismatch loss should
be increased if strings of different power classes are feeding into one MPPT input. Inputting strings
of different power classes into one MPPT input is not recommended from a design perspective. For
the Huawei string inverter, as there are a maximum of two strings feeding into one MPPT input, it
is easier to avoid strings of different power classes feeding into one MPPT input on a utility-scale
PV plant.
The calculation based upon the flash tests gives the minimum dispersion of the current and voltage
parameters, as the difference in flash-tested electrical parameters is just one source of mismatch.
On a plant, thermal gradients, different voltage drops through different lengths of cable, uneven
soiling and partial shading could all lead to extra mismatch loss.
 For a system containing Huawei string inverters and modules with a positive power tolerance
(as stated on their datasheets), a mismatch value of 0.3% is recommended. This value takes
into account the flash test data calculations and plant-related sources of mismatch:
– 0.3% should be entered into ‘Modules mismatch losses’ > ‘Power loss at MPP’;
– 0.0% can generally remain in ‘Strings voltage mismatch’ as the value of 0.3% accounts for
all the sources of mismatch listed above.
Note that for a central inverter, higher values of mismatch loss are expected, especially when there
is a large spread in PV module power. As an example, RINA modelled the energy yield for a UK

PVsyst guidelines
PV plant, Cowdown, using firstly Huawei string inverters and secondly central inverters. The
mismatch loss figure in the Cowdown project for central inverters was 0.6%3.
Partial shading considerations
Partial shading events can be caused by, for example, passing clouds, which is dependent on
project location, external shading objects and differences in inter-row shading between parts of the
array, with the overall electrical loss dependent on the number of strings per MPPT input. We note
that if unshaded and shaded/soiled module strings are feeding into the same MPPT input of an
inverter then the mismatch would increase.
Although clouds and other transient partial shading events may also cause an increase in mismatch
loss, the magnitude of the effect is considered to be within the uncertainty of the original
calculations. Fixed near shading objects could cause sufficient mismatch difference to affect plants
where there are hundreds of strings per MPPT (i.e. for central inverters) however for string
inverters, with few inputs per MPPT, on a utility-scale plant it is unlikely that any near shading
objects will materially increase plant mismatch losses. If there are likely to be numerous differences
in shading on strings feeding into the same MPPT input, this shading effect can be studied using
PVsyst’s module layout tool (Appendix B), with this mismatching being part of the ‘Near Shadings
– Electrical Effect’ loss in the loss diagram.
4.4 Soiling loss

Soiling loss can be modelled in PVsyst on an annual or monthly basis, The user should change the
soiling loss based on the specifics of the installation. From our experience, annual soiling losses
can typically range from 1% to 3%, although even higher soiling effects are possible if cleaning is
inadequate or in situations where very high soiling rates are present. The lower soiling loss is more
appropriate for a site with ample rainfall and no dust emission sources in the vicinity, the higher
soiling rate would apply to a site with little rainfall, minimal cleaning schedules or high dust emission
sources in the vicinity, e.g. an open mine or a desert.
v1.4, April 2018

PVsyst guidelines
Figure 23: Detailed Losses - Soiling Loss
4.5 IAM Losses

The IAM Losses tab is purely related to the PV module chosen and describes how reflective the
module is at difference angles of incidence. This data should ideally be obtained from the module
manufacturer and entered into the PAN file, if so, ‘Uses definition of the PV module’ should be
ticked (Figure 24, upper). If no information can be obtained, the user should untick ‘Uses definition
of the PV module’ and select ‘Ashrae parametrization’ from the dropdown list. If the PV module
datasheet states that the module has an anti-reflective coating, the default b0 value of 0.050 may
be slightly conservative and a lower value of 0.030-0.040 might be a better estimate (Figure 24,
lower).

PVsyst guidelines
Figure 24: Detailed Losses - IAM Losses
4.6 Auxiliaries
The ‘Auxiliaries’ tab allows for auxiliary losses due to miscellaneous sources of PV plant energy
consumption.
The auxiliary losses for naturally cooled string inverters are in general much lower than that of a
central inverter.
Central inverters usually have a force cooling system using either forced air, or an air conditioning
system. These parasitic loads vary greatly dependant on the type of cooling that is installed in the
inverter, however a range between 0.2% and 0.4% is within our expectations. There is also usually
lighting and electrical supplies included within the inverter cabin as well, which can increase the
consumption increasing the potential variables and making exact figures hard to establish.
With natural cooling and no additional sources fed from the Huawei inverters we would expect
auxiliary losses to be in the region of 0.1%.

PVsyst guidelines
If there are transformers used for the installation then the above figures will need to be revised to
ensure that transformer consumption is considered, along with any other loads that the site may
need to account for, such as air conditioning units within the transformer. We would consider that
a site with transformers and a small security system to have a power consumption of approximately
4 W per kW of installed capacity.
For a system with approximately 0.4% of total auxiliary losses (4 W per kW), the auxiliary losses
could be entered into the tab as shown in Figure 25. The variability of auxiliary losses can be high
and therefore it is recommended to undertake detailed studies based on the Project design in order
to derive an accurate estimation.
Figure 25: Detailed Losses - Auxiliary losses inclusive of a transformer at 0.4%
4.7 Ageing
In the ‘Ageing’ tab, PV module power degradation assumptions can be set. RINA’s practice is use
PVsyst to calculate the initial yield assumption and then to consider degradation over the plant
lifetime as a second step. If the user wishes to consider the yield for a specific year in the future
within PVsyst, they should tick ‘Uses degradation in the simulation’ (see Figure 26), enter the year
for which they wish the simulation to be performed (year 10 in the example shown) and then we
recommend that the annual PV module degradation rate is entered into the ‘Model’ section (0.4%
per year in this example, however the value is dependent on module technology and specifics).

PVsyst guidelines
Figure 26: Detailed Losses - Ageing
4.8 Unavailability
The ‘Unavailability’ tab allows the user to enter the expected fraction of time the plant will be entirely
non-productive (Figure 27).
Plant availability is often linked to, and guaranteed within, the EPC and O&M contracts for the
lifetime of the project. We would recommend using these figures for any yield or financial modelling
for the plant. We note that plants with different types of inverters may experience differences in
availability due to inverter downtime. For example, a much larger portion of generation lost when a
central inverter fails compared to a string inverter. Furthermore, for Huawei string inverters, we note
that string-level I-V testing can be undertaken via the inverter equipment, which would reduce any
downtime resulting from annual I-V curve checking as part of the O&M activities. We consider that
the O&M contractor should consider such factors in their guarantees or cost offerings.
We consider that unavailability can be considered outside of the PVsyst model, however the PVsyst
tool could be useful if periods of plant downtime due to scheduled grid maintenance, for example,
are already known.

PVsyst guidelines
Figure 27: Detailed Losses - Unavailability

PVsyst guidelines
5 Miscellaneous tools
Within the ‘Miscellaneous tools’ section (Figure 28) there are four tabs, three of which have
potential relevance for modelling Huawei inverters: Inverter Temperature, Power Factor, and Grid
Power limitation are addressed below.
Figure 28: Miscellaneous tools
5.1 Inverter temperature

Huawei string inverters are always installed outdoors so the default temperature setting “external
ambient temperature” can remain ticked (as per Figure 28).
5.2 Power factor

The Power factor tab allows the user to state whether there are power factor requirements on the
plant, at point of connection. To enter a power factor, the following steps must be undertaken:
 ‘Use power factor for grid injection’ must be ticked;
 The power factor should be entered in the box ‘Power factor = cos(phi)’. For the example in
Figure 29, a value of 0.9 power factor has been entered;
 Inverter PNom must be defined as ‘Apparent power’ in line with the OND file.

PVsyst guidelines
Figure 29: Miscellaneous tools – Power factor
Additional information on modelling power factor losses for a project are found in Section 6.2.
5.3 Grid power limitation

If the PV plant has grid power limitations enforced upon it, these can be entered in the Grid power
limitation tab (Figure 30). This is the easiest way of implementing an export limitation, but the power
output value upon which PVsyst applies the limitation will not take into account any losses which
are applied outside of the PVsyst software (see Section 6). For this reason we recommend that this
loss be calculated outside of PVsyst using the process described in Section 6.3
Whether there is any grid-connection limit at all and whether such limit is applied at inverter level
or at the point at which the energy is injected into the grid will depend on regulations and conditions
imposed by the network operator.
Figure 30: Miscellaneous tools – Grid power limitation
‘Limit applied at the inverter level’, also known as hard clipping, is the simplest way to ensure that
the grid limitation is met. Using the 600 kW limit as an example, all the inverters running at
maximum power will not be able to export higher than 600 kW in the best operating conditions. If
there is further electrical infrastructure e.g. a transformer and cabling as well, then an even higher
loss will be seen at the grid connection points, this can be as high as 3+% for larger plants. If for
example there was a detailed cable loss calculation for the AC side which returned a loss of 1%

PVsyst guidelines
minimum cable loss, then this could be factored into the hard clipping. In this case the hard clipping
could be increased to 606 kW for the site, as it is known that 1% will be lost through the cabling.
‘Limit applied at the injection point’, usually seen in larger plants where the cost of the additional
equipment, for example a power point controller, can be easily recovered. In this instance, the
inverters will generate as much as possible all the time, until the power point controller has 600 kW
received at the grid connection point, it will then reduce inverter outputs to ensure this limit is never
exceeded. This means that all electrical losses etc. are overcome before any loss in generation is
received. Should there be any underperformance on the site, for example an inverter where some
the strings are shaded causing a reduction in output, then the other inverters will no longer be
clipped until the 600 kW is seen at the grid connection point.

PVsyst guidelines
6 Loss calculations outside of PVsyst

The PR of a PV plant will include some losses that cannot be calculated within the PVsyst
simulation, two of which are described in this section. To calculate the overall PR based on both
the losses from PVsyst those and calculated externally, the following steps must be undertaken:
 Input the individual PVsyst losses from the PVsyst loss diagram into a spreadsheet and then
add the external loss calculations to the table (Columns 1 and 2 in Figure 31);
 As energy passes through the system - from sunlight to energy injected into the grid - each
subsequent loss acts upon the energy that remains after the previous losses are taken into
account, not the total initial energy (Column 3 in Figure 31). In the example below, 90.6% of
input energy reaches the inverter, meaning the next loss, inverter efficiency loss, acts upon
90.6% of the initial input energy. An easy way to calculate this in a spreadsheet, is to calculate
‘1 minus the loss value’ for each of these losses (Column 3 in Figure 31). The final PR is the
product of the ‘1 minus the loss value’ figures.
It is important that the losses are not simply subtracted from 100% in turn (Column 5 in Figure 31)
as this will overestimate the impact of the losses.
Figure 31: Post-processing losses
Note that the Loss figures shown in Figure 31 are from a specific project, the Cowdown PV plant
in the UK, which uses Huawei 33KTL string inverters4. The losses shown will vary according to the
PV plant components used and their specifications, as detailed throughout the rest of this
document. An example of loss estimates of the Cowdown plant using a central inverter model is
given in the Cowdown report.
v1.4, April 2018

PVsyst guidelines
6.1 MPPT loss

An additional loss in energy output occurs because the inverters cannot track the maximum power
point (MPP) of the strings feeding into it with 100% efficiency. As operating conditions change, the
inverter must determine the maximum power available from the module strings and adjusts the
operating point as required. The accuracy of this control algorithm incurs a loss. This loss is derived
from:
 The ability of the inverters to track the maximum power point as tested according to standard
EN50530, in other words the MPPT efficiency;
 The variability in weather conditions on the site, particularly the frequency of passing clouds,
which would result in a more rapidly varying MPP of the strings.
This loss cannot currently be calculated in PVsyst so RINA has developed a methodology5 to
estimate the MPPT loss, based on climatic information for the site region (focussing on the ratio of
global to diffuse irradiance), and detailed static and dynamic MPPT inverter efficiency information
provided.
The static and dynamic efficiencies provided are shown in Table 1 and are considered to be very
high compared to other inverters available in the market. We input the MPPT efficiency figures into
our calculation tool, and evaluate the results for climatic conditions for locations around the world.
Table 1: MPPT efficiency and resulting MPPT loss

Inverter EU static MPPT Dynamic MPPT MPPT loss
efficiency efficiency*
60KTL-M0 99.98% at 600 Vdc 99.87% 0.1% (to one d.p. for all
locations)
100KTL-H1 99.92% at 1080 Vdc 99.82% 0.1-0.2% (to one d.p)
0.1%: to be used for areas with
high GHI including Africa and
the Middle East
0.2%: to be used for temperate
regions including Europe
* average from both the low and high power measurements
We note that the values are strongly inverter model dependent but that for other modern inverters,
RINA has seen MPPT loss figures of up to 0.9% for temperate regions and up to 0.6% for areas
with high GHI.
6.2 Power factor losses

Utilities often require a PV system to absorb or provide reactive power to the grid system. There
are different control modes that may be enforced through the grid code, however the increased
flow of reactive power results in a non-unity power factor which is controlled at the point of
5 M. Egler, S. Gordon & P. Yim, ‘Global Method for Calculating Location Specific MPP Tracking Losses Using
Available Weather Statistics’, 32nd EUPVSEC, 2016

PVsyst guidelines
connection. The inverter’s role is to control the amount of reactive power flow, which must be
provided within its capability: increased reactive current flow from the inverter results in a reduced
capability to generate active power, behaving similar to a power clipping function. For this reason,
the maximum active power from Huawei SUN2000 inverters reduces from the stated maximum AC
power at a power factor of 1.00 (66 kW for the SUN2000-60KTL-M0 inverter and 105 kW for the
SUN2000-100KTL-H1 inverter) to the inverter’s nominal power at a power factor of 0.90.
Inductive and capacitive components of the PV system balance of plant (e.g. transformers and AC
cables) will impact the power factor at the inverter level required, however this is not dealt with in
PVsyst, and for the purpose of a yield study it is a reasonable approximation to assume that the
factor required at the point of connection can be assumed the same at the inverter level. For some
fixed power factor operating scenarios, it is recommended to model the balance of plant to
determine the power factor settings at the inverter.
In PVsyst, the power factor can be adjusted in ‘Miscellaneous tools > Power factor’ (see Section
5.2).
A non-unity power factor requirement will result in the following losses:

 Losses due to reduction in active power capability of the inverter;
 Additional losses in efficiency of the inverter
 Additional losses in AC cables and transformers due to reactive current
The inverter efficiency loss could be considered as an additional loss to be added after the PVsyst
simulation has been run; however the impact of this loss, which varies according to the level of
reactive power requirement, would not be as significant as the above losses and could be
considered non-material.
6.3 Grid Power Limitation

If the PV plant has grid power limitations enforced upon it, these can be entered in the Grid power
limitation tab as described in Section 5.3, however RINA recommend that this loss is calculated
outside of PVsyst by applying the process described below:
 Run the PVsyst simulation;
 Extract PVsyst’s simulated hourly energy output values for the plant and copy them into a
spreadsheet;
 Apply any external losses to the hourly values;
 Determine whether the grid power limitation is exceeded at any point and thus calculate the
resultant power loss over the year due to this limit.

PVsyst guidelines
Appendices
A. Minimum cell temperature at the PV plant location

In the project home screen, click ‘Meteo database’ (orange box, Figure 32) then click ‘Meteo tables
and graphs’ (red dashed box, Figure 32). Select the Tables tab (purple box, Figure 32) and then
select ambient temperature, ‘Amb. Temperature’ and Hourly values before clicking ‘Table’ (blue
dashed box, Figure 32).
Figure 32: ‘Meteo database’ – meteorological tables
The hourly temperature values over a typical meteorological year will pop up in a separate window.
Find the maximum and minimum temperatures recorded in this list. It may help to export the file
into a spreadsheet by clicking ‘Export’ then ‘Copy to Clipboard as text’. Now these values can be
pasted into a spreadsheet for easier examination, and the maximum and minimum ambient
temperatures can be identified. Whilst this provides an indication of the temperature profile for a
typical year, extreme values may not be included here. It is therefore recommended that, should

PVsyst guidelines
local temperature information be available (national meteorological organisations, SYNOPTIC

network ground station data, climatic data etc) temperature extremes are investigated in more detail
to confirm any assumptions used.
Next, go back to the Home screen and open ‘Project settings’ and in ‘Design conditions’ change
the ‘Lower temperature for Absolute Voltage limit’ to the minimum temperature for the site, rounded
down to the nearest integer.
Figure 33: ‘Project settings’ – changing the temperature limits
B. Module Layout
This tool enables the user to set modules into strings according to the Single Line Diagram (SLD).
It can be useful to evaluate partial shading effects on mismatch calculations but should not be used
for very large plants as it is computationally intensive and thus a very slow tool.
Near shadings should be used to model shading for the whole field in order to determine shading
losses but the module layout tool can help us identify how differences in partial shading across
strings that feed into one MPPT input would affect the mismatch value.
To carry out this evaluation, firstly the near shading scene needs to be modelled accurately, as
near shading objects and PV table specifications cannot be changed within this Module Layout
section. Once that is done, the following steps should be undertaken in the Module Layout tool:

PVsyst guidelines
‘Mechanical’ tab
 In the ‘All subfields’ tab – check the module details are correct then click “set modules” and the
formerly white sheds will fill blue. Each individual module needs to be positioned correctly
before other options become available so it is important that the shading scene correctly
matches the dimensions of all the modules.
Figure 34: Module Layout - Mechanical
‘Electrical’ tab
Within the ‘Electrical’ tab, the modules can be positioned into strings. This can be done
automatically, using ‘Auto attribution’ or modules can be placed individually according to the
stringing design.

PVsyst guidelines
Figure 35: Module Layout - Electrical
‘Shadings 3D’ tab
Within the ‘Shadings 3D’ tab, the shading scenario can be run for one day, chosen to be mid-winter
in order to identify the maximum impact on shading. Once run, ‘Shading factor for beam, electrical’
will give the ‘Near shadings – electrical effect loss’ as applicable to the string layout. This value can
be compared to the ‘Near shadings – electrical effect loss’ as calculated for that day in the ‘Near
Shadings’ tool, in order to calculate whether any extra loss should be considered.

PVsyst guidelines
Figure 36: Module Layout – Shadings 3D
C. Glossary
Table 2: Glossary
Term Description
Impp Current at the maximum power point (of a PV module or a string)
Isc Short circuit current (of PV module or a string)
I-V curve Current-voltage curve
MPPT Maximum power point tracker
O&M Operations & Maintenance
OND file Onduleur file = the file detailing the inverter parameters in PVsyst
PAN file Panneau file = the file detailing the PV module parameters in PVsyst
PF Power Factor
PR Performance Ratio
String PV modules connected in series
SLD Single Line Diagram
STC Standard Test Conditions
Vmpp Voltage at the maximum power point (of a PV module or a string)
Voc Open circuit voltage (of a PV module or a string)

PVsyst guidelines
Term Description
Impp Current at the maximum power point (of a PV module or a string)
Isc Short circuit current (of PV module or a string)
D. Frequently Asked Questions

The following questions were proposed by Huawei as being commonly asked questions from their
customers.
1. Why do you use power sharing function since Huawei string inverter doesn’t have power
sharing ability?
The manuals state that the PV strings connecting to the same MPPT circuit should contain the
same number of identical PV modules. The possibility of having an unbalanced input configuration
is not stated.
‘Power sharing’, enables the user to adjust the percentage of nominal power per MPPT for each
subarray (see Section 2.2). We refer the user to the PVsyst online help guidelines
(http://files.pvsyst.com/help/powersharing.htm) for more details information if an unbalanced
configuration must be modelled.
2. What’s the mismatch loss by using string solution?
Although string inverter solutions offer an advantage over central inverters with respect to
mismatch, the overall power loss is dependent on several factors, mainly driven by different climatic
or design conditions as well as non-homogenous electrical properties of the PV array. These factors
include manufacturing tolerances, thermal gradients across modules, uneven soiling, uneven
module degradation, mismatched modules on a string, mismatched strings into an MPPT input and
partial shading.
Based on the module power tolerance i.e. if the module tolerance is positive, symmetrical or
asymmetrical, our expectations for this loss in string solutions will range between 0.3% and 0.6%,
in comparison, central inverter solutions are expected to have a higher mismatch loss.
3. Why do you set the mismatch value for a plant with string inverters lower than that for a
plant with central inverters? How will the mismatch value change with bifacial modules?
There are significantly more strings on a central inverter with each string introducing its own slightly
different electrical characteristics (both from production and also installation e.g. soiling, shadings,
etc.), which is compounded with the higher variance. This means that the MPP tracker will have a
larger number and range of maximum power points to try and track at the same time, causing a
greater loss.
Bifacial modules absorb light from both sides of the module. This causes a greater variability of the
amount of light absorbed by each module and thus a higher value for mismatch should be used for
a bifacial PV plant compared to a monofacial PV plant. The extent of this increase in mismatch
value will depend on factors such as number of PV modules mounted vertically on a table, module
tilt angle and height of modules from the ground and rear shading objects.

PVsyst guidelines
4. Why the overload loss in the “system” is bigger than the inverter power loss in the “loss
diagram” of report?
The loss diagram figures may be significantly different from the ‘system’ sizing value because the
histogram for the sizing tool is a high-level analysis that does not account for all the system losses
(e.g. soiling, DC cable loss, etc). Once these are discreetly calculated in the hourly simulation, the
inverter DC input is lower, which then results in a lower final inverter undersizing loss.
5. Why does the maximum current in the OND file not match the maximum current in the
datasheet?
Some values in PVsyst are only displayed as integers and the maximum current is one such value,
when inverter power ratings exceed ~80 kVA. For example, the datasheet of the SUN2000-
100KTL-H1 inverter states a maximum current of 80.2A, whereas in the OND file, 80A is displayed
and PVsyst does not permit ’80.2’ to be entered. This does not mean that 80.2A is not used,
however. The OND file can be opened as a text file (the OND file located in the user’s personal
PVsyst database, within Compos PV > Inverters) and here the user can check and even modify
the maximum current parameter (see the red box in Figure 37).
Figure 37: OND file text file - modification outside of PVsyst

PVsyst guidelines
6. How do you set the configuration to distinguish the different temperature design. For
example, for 40℃ or 35℃, how to set the parameter?
In the ‘Main parameters’ tab of the OND file, it is possible to define different ‘Nominal AC Power’
and ‘Maximum AC Power’ values. Once these are different, it is possible to define the temperature
intervals in the ‘Output parameters’ tab.
In order to input correct figures, we recommend that the temperature power derating profile of the
inverters are requested from the manufacturer. Huawei has provided these details. In the ‘Output
parameters’ tab, the user should allow for overpower and high temperature limitations and input
the relevant temperatures for each AC power value.
Please see Section 2.5.4 for more details.
7. When overloading more than 40%, the “inverter loss over normal power” of string inverter
is higher than central, why?
Should the user define the same number of modules per string, same inverter MPPT windows and
same DC/AC ratios for string and central inverters with similar efficiencies and oversizing
properties, we do not foresee major deviations, as long as the total number of strings are identical.
If there is a difference in the ‘inverter loss over nominal power’, the difference is likely to be due to
the differences in the inverter efficiencies or oversizing capabilities.
8. How to set availability in PVsyst, what's the difference between string and central
solution?
Plant availability is determined by the quality of the PV components (modules, cables, inverters
etc.) but also dependent upon features of the O&M contract, i.e. how well the plant is monitored
and how quickly any component faults are fixed. As such, we consider that unavailability is a loss
that can be applied after the PVsyst yield is run and should be based upon the specification of the
O&M contract. Typically this would be considered outside of the energy yield simulation as a
separate line item in the financial model.
Saying that, there is an availability function in PVsyst which also allows the periods of unavailability
to be defined. The effective energy loss is dependent on the season and weather conditions during
the unavailability periods. Therefore, the unavailability loss has only a statistical meaning.
Typical financial model assumptions for plant availability do not typically differentiate between string
and central inverter technologies but there will be different factors contributing to the availability of
the two types of system. A central inverter failure generally results in a higher proportion of the
plant being unproductive and the failures can be more complex to repair and may require specialist
labour, which may be reflected in the O&M contract price. The increased complexity and generation
impact from a single unit outage can lead to central inverters contributing towards a lower overall
plant availability. Conversely string inverters have an increased component count and therefore
more frequent failures may be expected on-site; typically string inverter issues can be resolved by
the O&M team by replacing the string inverter with spares stock, assuming number of failures are
within expectations and spares are available.
For Huawei string inverters, we note that string-level I-V testing can be undertaken via the inverter
equipment, which would reduce any downtime resulting from annual I-V curve checking as part of
the O&M activities. For a central inverter system, string-level I-V curve checking would require the
string’s combiner box to be disconnected.

PVsyst guidelines
9. What is the difference in setting “Multi-MPPT feature” and inverter quantity, in system
configuration?
If the inverter has multiple MPPTs, you can connect strings with different characteristics to separate
MPPTs to avoid further mismatch losses; for example if a PV system has different module
orientations, you can connect one module orientation to one MPPT and other orientation to another
MPPT.
When the ‘multiple MPPT’ feature is set in PVsyst, the software models each MPPT as an
independent inverter, enabling more complex system configurations to be input and more accurate
inverter losses to be output.
10. Why is it best to calculate grid power limitation outside of PVsyst?
Section 5.3 describes how a grid power limit can be input into PVsyst and summarises the effect
of different ways of accounting for the grid power limits. Although PVsyst’s grid power limitation tool
is an easy-to-use way of implementing a grid power limitation, for it to be accurate all potential
sources of energy loss must have been modelled within PVsyst. It is important that grid power limits
are applied to the final energy output of the PV array (or inverter, depending on where the limit is
to be applied) after all losses have been accounted for. Therefore if any external losses are to be
applied to the PVsyst output after the simulation has been run, the grid power limitation loss should
only be calculated once these losses have been considered, which means calculating the loss
separately, outside of PVsyst, as described in Section 436.3.
11. What are the P50 and P95 values in Pvsyst? How can one use these parameters?
In ‘Miscellaneous tools’ there is a tab called ‘P50 – P90 estimation’, which displays a probability
distribution graph once the PVsyst yield simulation has been run (Figure 38)
Figure 38: Miscellaneous tools – P50 – P90
 In any single year, there is an estimated 50% probability that the energy produced by the plant
will exceed the P50 energy value.

PVsyst guidelines
 In any single year, there is an estimated 90% probability that the energy production will exceed
the P90 energy value.
 Any Pxx value can be calculated by inputting the xx value in the ‘Resulting estimation’ box
P50 and P90 values are often requested for use in the financial models of any party investing in
the PV plant.
In order to obtain the P90 value, uncertainties are applied to the yield calculation, for example
measurement uncertainties in irradiation or module flash testing. Values for variability and
uncertainty in irradiation data and yield modelling parameters can be input within the ‘P50 – P90
estimation tool’.
A detailed uncertainty analysis is likely to involve more parameters than those listed here, for
example, RINA performs an uncertainty analysis outside of PVsyst to encompass other parameters
such as, uncertainties due to the range of irradiation sources used, inter-annual variability in
irradiation and uncertainties associated with each individual energy loss. We recommend that the
user undertakes (or commissions) a detailed uncertainty analysis before considering the P90
values.
Additionally, it should be noted that PXX factors are not intended to capture the potential for project
underperformance, only uncertainty in the various modelling inputs and methodologies.

PVsyst guidelines
RINA Consulting Ltd.
2nd Floor Offices

Nile House, Nile Street
Brighton, BN1 1HW, UK
+44 (0)1273 819 429

rina.org

Huawei - PVsyst Guidelines - V 1.2

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Huawei - PVsyst Guidelines - V 1.2

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

PVsyst guidelines

Modelling Huawei inverters in PVsyst

Huawei Technologies Deutschland GmbH

September 2018 v1.2

Issue and Revision Record

September 2018 │ v1.2

September 2018 │ v1.2

September 2018 │ v1.2 4

Figure 1: PVsyst grid-connected project home screen

September 2018 │ v1.2 5

Figure 2: PVsyst report loss diagram

September 2018 │ v1.2 6

2.1 Designing the string configuration

𝑀𝑎𝑥 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 <= 𝑀𝑎𝑥 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒

𝑀𝑎𝑥 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 <= 𝑀𝑎𝑥 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡

𝛽𝐼𝑠𝑐 × (𝑇𝑚𝑎𝑥 – 𝑆𝑇𝐶)

September 2018 │ v1.2 7

2.2 Inputting the string configuration into PVsyst

September 2018 │ v1.2 8

The following configuration details could be entered:

Clarification Note: unbalanced configurations

Sometimes systems need to be set up with unbalanced configurations. Examples of unbalanced

September 2018 │ v1.2 9

Figure 4: ‘System’ home screen – unbalanced inputs and multi-MPPT feature

September 2018 │ v1.2 10

2.3 System warnings

Figure 5: ‘System’ home screen – warning box

Warning 1 (blue warning, i.e. information only):

September 2018 │ v1.2 11

Warning 2 (orange or red warning, depending on severity):

Warning 3 (orange warning):

Warning 4 (red warning):

September 2018 │ v1.2 12

Warning 5 (orange or red warning depending on severity):

“The inverter power is slightly/strongly undersized”

2.4 PAN file

September 2018 │ v1.2 13

Figure 6: PAN file – Basic data

2.5 OND file

September 2018 │ v1.2 14

Figure 7: System – Opening the OND file

2.5.1 Main parameters

September 2018 │ v1.2 15

Figure 8: Default OND file – 60 KTL-M0 – main parameters

September 2018 │ v1.2 16

Figure 9: SUN2000-60KTL-M0 datasheet: matching datasheet parameters with PVsyst

Max. efficiency [‘Efficiency curve’ tab]

Absolute max. PV voltage

Min. Voltage for Pnom

Maximum AC current (only integers allowed in PVsyst)

September 2018 │ v1.2 17

𝑁𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑃𝑉 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑀𝑃𝑃𝑇

𝑁𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐴𝐶 𝑃𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 (𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑀𝑃𝑃𝑇) 60,000/6

September 2018 │ v1.2 18

 ‘Frequency’ values are ticked as per datasheet specifications;

September 2018 │ v1.2 19

Figure 11: Modified OND file – SUN2000-100KTL-M0

2.5.2 Efficiency curve

September 2018 │ v1.2 20

Figure 12: OND file – Efficiency curve

Figure 13: Efficiency data for SUN2000-60KTL-M0 and SUN2000-100KTL-H1 inverters

In order to enter data:

September 2018 │ v1.2 21