SE-C-4.3.

1-F02
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSEMENT FORM Project: Sphere Tank Cleaning 2020-2021 Issue: 1 Revision :
0
PERSON PARTICIPATED &
ACTIVITY AREA DEPT SECTION
CONSULTED

Firdaus
SPHERE TANK CLEANING FOR DOSH INSPECTION TERMINAL 3 MAINTENANCE MECHANICAL
Dinesh

DESIGNATION No. ASSESSORS Prepared by ENV ENGINEER REVIEW ERA APROVAL (DEPT HEAD)

Supervisor
1 MR. NORZAMAN MOHAMAD NAZMI BIN MOHAMAD RAFIAN Mr Shanmugam
QC

DATE 2 DATE DATE DATE

07.05.2020 07.05.2020
Hazard Identification Risk Assessment Risk Control

Hierarchy of control in
determining additional control:
Risk 1. Elimination of hazards
Applicable environmental C,PC, significant RQ (I-
No. Sequence / Sub-Activity COA Aspect Impact Existing control measures S (1-5) P (1-5) Rating 2. Substitution
legislations(statesectio n/reg) NC,NA aspect? IV)
(1-25) 3. Engineering
4. Administrative
5. Spill Kit

Mobilization equipment to sphere tank. • Standby tray and spill kits (absorbent EQ (Ind Effluent) Reg 2009 + EQ
1 N/NR Oil/Diesel Spilled Water + Land pollution C 3 1 Y 3 1
(Genset, Aircompressor,Diesel) pads) (Schedule waste) Reg 2005

• Standby tray and spill kits (absorbent EQ (Ind Effluent) Reg 2009 + EQ
N/NR Spillage of diesel onto the ground Water + Land pollution C 2 1 N 2 1
pads) (Schedule waste) Reg 2005

• Ensure that the equipment has

undergoing regular maintenance.
N/NR Emission of dark smoke Air Pollution EQ (ClearAir) Reg 2014 C 3 1 Y 3 1
Running of Genset and Aircompressor. • Emission measurement and
2 monitoring
Refuel Diesel.

N/NR Gas present Air polution • Perform gas test before start work EQ (ClearAir) Reg 2014 C 3 1 Y 3 1

Hazard Identification Risk Assessment Risk Control

 Hierarchy of control in
determining additional control:
1. Elimination of hazards
Risk 2. Substitution
Applicable environmental C,PC, significant RQ (I- 3. Engineering
No. Sequence / Sub-Activity COA Aspect Impact Existing control measures S (1-5) P (1-5) Rating
legislations(statesectio n/reg) NC,NA aspect? IV) 4. Administrative
(1-25)
5. Spill Kit

1) Schedule waste management SE-

Disposal of contaminated EQ (Ind Effluent) Reg 2009 + EQ
3 Housekeeping work area N/NR Land Pollution E4.4.6-P01 2) C 3 1 Y 2 1
material/rag/gloves/absorbent pads (Schedule waste) Reg 2005
Not mixed with other general waste
 Appendix 4.1
RISK ASSESSMENT FLOWCHART Page 1 of 1
Issue 3

TRIGGER
(Internal/External)
Existing.1
New.2
Changes.3
Revision.4
Contractor .5
activities

Appoint minimum of 2
Assesors, Members and
Persons involving in the
activities by Department
Manager

Conduct Risk Assessment

1.Evaluate severity and probability
2.Risk Ranking
3.Risk Rating
4.Evaluate existing control measures
5.Risk Quadrant
6.Risk Conclusion

Safety/Environment
Personnel Review Risk
Assessment

Develop Objective and

Management Programs

Final Approval by
Department
Manager

END
 Appendix 4.2a
POTENTIAL HAZARDS/CONSEQUENCES & CHECKLIST Page 1 of 1
Issue 2

HAZARD CONSEQUENCE

Cut by sharp Edges Cuts to hands, fingers and arms

Poked by protruding Parts Punctures to feet / hand / fingers

Falling / Trip / Slipping Fatality, head injury, minor cut, back injury

Hit by flying Object / Spark / Chip Skin cuts, blind (eye), punctures

Rub against Rough Surface Cuts / scratches to skin, hands

Contact with Hot Surface Burns to skin, hands, fingers

Exposed to High Noise Standard Threshold Shift (STS)

Temporary / permanent deafness

Exposed to High Temperature Dehydration, dizzy and exhaustion

Exposed to Cold Temperature Frostbites, hyporhermia

Hit by Moving Parts injury to body parts / hands / legs

Fingers Caught in between … Cuts to fingers / hands, curshed fingers

Body Strike against … Injury tobody parts / hands / legs

Exposed to Radiation (Ionizing) Injury / burn to tissue / skin

Chemical Splash onto body Severe skin burn, blister, damage tissue, scar

Inhalation of … Nausea, dizziness, loss of consciousness

Exposed to Carcinogenic substance Cancer to skin / lung etc

Fire / Explosion Burns to body / skin etc

Overexertion Back injury, strain, sprain, fatigue, damage to tissue

repetitive Motion Fatigue, stress, human error

Work Long Hours Stress, human error

Out of Reach Back injury, sprain

Contact with Electrical Current Electrocuted, burns to body / Skin, shock

Body subject to Vibration Damage to nerve endings or materials fatigue

 Appendix 4.2b
POTENTIAL ASPECT/IMPACT & CHECKLIST FOR
Page 1 of 1
Environment Risk Assessment Issue 4

ASPECT IMPACT

LAND

Disposal of schedule waste Land contamination, air pollution when incinerate

Disposal of general waste Land contamination, consuming landfill space

Spillage of spent oil Land contamination

Spillage of chemical Land contamination

AIR

Emission of dark smoke Air pollution

Emission of dust particles Air pollution, hazardous air

Emission of CO2 Air pollution, global warming

Emission of noise Noise pollution

WATER

Discharge of effluent Water pollution

Discharge of septic tank water Water pollution

Discharge of IETS water Water pollution

Spillage of oil Water pollution

Spillage of chemical Water pollution

GENERAL

Usage of paper Deforestation

Usage of electrity Emission of CO2

Usage of water Energy use to process water causing emision of CO2

Planting of trees Release of O2

Reuse / recycle of paper Prevent / reduce deforestation

 Appendix 4.3
Page 1 of 1
Issue 4

RISK RANKING CATEGORY - SEVERITY

5 4 3 2 1
CATASTROPHIC MAJOR CRITICAL MARGINAL NEGLIGIBLE

Nature of Injury Multiple Fatality Single Fatality Permanent or partial

LTA Medical treatment
or Ill health total disability
Reversible Injury MTFA/ FA
Irreversible InjuryTemp. total disability
Industrial Diseases
Community One or more fatality One or more severe injury One or more minor injury Annoyance complaints fromNA
or illness or illness public.

Environment Severe environmental
damage.
Severely polluting the
environment in
surrounding plant area
including river, soil or air.
Pollution covers the range
of >200m from plant.
Disaster state, destroying
community, flora and
fauna.
Significant environmental
damage.
Significantly polluting the
environment in
surrounding plant area
including river, soil or air.
Pollution covers the range
from 50m to 200m from
plant.
Severely affecting nearby
community, flora and
fauna.
Moderate environmental Contamination No enviromental damage
damage. Damage sufficiently to or issue.
Sufficient to pollute the attack the environment
environmental at plant within plant area.
area including nearby
river, soil or air.
Pollution covers up to 50m
from plant.
Affecting adjacent
community, flora and
fauna.

Fire & Explosion Extensive Damage Heavy Damage Repairable Damage General Damage Unnoticeable Damage
Irrepairable Major equipment damage Jet fire Equipment Damage Smoke
UVCE/ BLEVE Tank fire Mechanical explosion Fire occurrence
Gas release

Cost > 50 k 50 k 10 k <5k <1k

COA Condition of assessment A

W hazard created from the work itself y GR ent)
d B ssm
V hazard created in the vicinity of workplace
U se sse
A
O hazard originating outside workplace ing sk
R routine activity Be l Ri
A ra
NR non-routine activity CO ene
(G

COA Condition of assessment

E Emergency t)
A en
N Normal
y ER ssm
s e
AbN Abnormal dB s
Use isk A
Determination of Significant Aspect R
ing nt
Contidition Significant Aspect B e me
A o n
S>3 Yes CO nvir
RR > 8 Yes (E
Note: Minimum admin control is needed when S > 3
 Appendix 4.3
Page 1 of 1
Issue : 2
RISK RANKING CATEGORY - PROBABILITY
Consideration on (Engineering,
Rating Likelihood Occurrence Consideration on human factors
Administractive, PPE)

For Administrative control on human factors, the following are observed:

I. Competence, Awareness, Training - Excellent

Can happen =< 1

time in a year
All applicable controls are relevant, ii. Physical condition - height, strength - matches the worker or better
Unlikely

applied and systematically iii. Workers on shift and shift duration - monitored, no longer than 8 hours in one shift
implemented in terms of iv. Fitness required against the work nature - based on medical condition, approved by panel doctor (e.g. MC,
1

Engineering, Administrative and
PPE/spill kit.
Can happen 3 times in a
Yearly health surveillance, Pre-recruitment and upgrading check-up)
v. Behaviour towards safety/environmental - Staffs/worker have the culture of following SWP, concern on
safety/environmental prior to execution of work and react if control not implemented, program for environmental /
behaviour based safety being implemented and maintained with objectives set for continual improvement

For Administrative control on human factors, the following are observed:

I. Competence, Awareness, Training - Adequate
All applicable control are applied, ii. Physical condition - height, strength - matches the worker
Seldom

however, further control on iii. Workers on shift and shift duration - adequate, no longer than 12 hours in one shift,
year
2

engineering, administrative and/or iv. Fitness required against the work nature - based on acceptable medical condition, approved by panel doctor
PPE/spill kit is required v. Behaviour towards safety/environmental - Staffs/worker have the habit of following SWP, concern on
safety/environmental prior to execution of work, program for environmental / behaviour based safety being
implemented

For Administrative control on human factors, any four of the following are observed:
times in a year

I. Competence, Awareness, Training - Adequate

Can happen 6
Occasional

Certain engineering, administrative ii. Physical condition - height, strength - matches the worker
and/or PPE/spill kit control are iii. Workers on shift and shift duration - adequate, no longer than 12 hours in one shift,
3

available, however, not adequate iv. Fitness required against the work nature - based on acceptable medical condition, approved by panel doctor
or relevant to minimize the risk. v. Behaviour towards safety/environmental - Staffs/worker have the habit of following SWP, concern on
safety/environmental prior to execution of work, program for environmental / behaviour based safety being
implemented

For Administrative control on human factors, any 2 of the following are observed:
once a month

I. Competence, Awareness, Training - not adequate

Can happen
Probable

Most of engineering, administrative ii. Physical condition - height, strength - poorly match with physical work assigned
(likely)

and/or PPE/spill kit control are iii. Workers on shift and shift duration - poorly control, more than 12 hours per shift,
4

inadequate. iv. Fitness required against the work nature - poorly evaluated
v. Behaviour towards safety/environmental - poor acceptance of SWP, inadequate environmental / behaviour based
safety program

For Administrative control on human factors, any 3 or more of the following are observed:
once a week
(very likely)

Can happen

I. Competence, Awareness, Training - not adequate

Frequent

There's no obvious control on the ii. Physical condition - height, strength - poorly match with physical work assigned
5

activity. iii. Workers on shift and shift duration - poorly control, more than 12 hours per shift,
iv. Fitness required against the work nature - poorly evaluated
v. Behaviour towards safety - poor acceptance of SWP, inadequate behaviour based safety program
 Appendix 4.4
RISK RATING MATRIX Page 1 of 1
Issue 2

PROBABILITY
1 2 3 4 5

1 1 2 3 4 5
2 2 4 6 8 10
3 3 6 9 12 15
4 4 8 12 16 20
5 5 10 15 20 25
 Appendix 4.5
EXISTING CONTROL MEASURES Page 1 of 2
Issue 4

ENGINEERING CONTROL MEASURES

Enclosure/ Closed system Example Control For GRA
Isolation Example Control For GRA
Local Exhaust Ventilation Example Control For GRA
General ventilation Example Control For GRA
Water spray Example Control For GRA
Control equipment Example Control For GRA
Process Control Example Control For GRA
Alarm/ Detection System Example Control For GRA
Interlock system Example Control For GRA
Physical Protection (SV, dike, etc) Example Control For GRA
Machine Guarding Example Control For GRA
Bund / containment Example Control For ERA
WWTP Example Control For ERA
Steam injection Example Control For ERA
Oil trap Example Control For ERA
Septic tank Example Control For ERA
Oil drainage system Example Control For ERA

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL MEASURES

Operating Procedures/ Work Instruction Example Control For GRA
Training Example Control For GRA
Competency Example Control For GRA
Permit To Work (PTW) Example Control For GRA
Safe Work Practices Example Control For GRA
Signage Example Control For GRA
Maintenance & Inspection (e.g. WWTP, STP, etc) Example Control For GRA
Supervision Example Control For GRA
Hygiene practices Example Control For GRA
Medical surveillance Example Control For GRA
Emergency Response Example Control For ERA
Emission measurement and monitoring Example Control For ERA
Discharge measurement and monitoring Example Control For ERA
Disposal measurement and monitoring Example Control For ERA
Discharge by DOE approved contractors Example Control For ERA
Discharge at DOE approved prescribed premises Example Control For ERA
Labelling - SW Example Control For ERA
 Appendix 4.5
EXISTING CONTROL MEASURES Page 2 of 2
Issue 4

PPE/SPILL KIT REQUIREMENTS

Back Support Example Control For GRA
Protective Clothing/Radiation Shield Apron/Coverall Example Control For GRA
Safety Helmet Example Control For GRA
Safety Glasses Example Control For GRA
Face Shield/Welding Shield Example Control For GRA
Goggles Example Control For GRA
Ear Plugs/Ear Muffs Example Control For GRA
Safety Harness Example Control For GRA
Safety Shoes / Chemical Boots Example Control For GRA
Cotton/Leather/Chemical Gloves Example Control For GRA
Dust mask Example Control For GRA
No Protection Example Control For GRA
Others Example Control For GRA
Chemical cartridge respirators Example Control For GRA
Self Contained Breathing Apparatus Example Control For GRA
Oil/chemical absorbent pad Example Control For ERA
Oil/chemical absorbent boom Example Control For ERA
Oil/chemical absorbent sock Example Control For ERA
Oil/chemical absorbnet pillow Example Control For ERA
Spill kits - sand, saw dust, bags Example Control For ERA
 Appendix 4.6
RECOMMENDATIONS / ACTIONS TO BE
Page 1 of 1
TAKEN Issue 2

Legal
Risk Risk Risk
compliance Action and Time Scale
Rating Quadrant Conclusion
status
I C Trivial No action required
Efforts shall be made to reduce the risk.
III PC Significant Risk reduction measures shall be implemented
within a defined time period (6 months)
1-3
Work should not be started until the risk has been
reduced. Considerable resources shall be allocated to reduce
IV NC Intolerable
the risk. Where the risk involves work in progress, urgent action
(within 3 working days, min. admin control) shall be taken
I C Acceptable No action required
Efforts shall be made to reduce the risk.
III PC Significant Risk reduction measures shall be implemented
within a defined time period (6 months)
4-6
Work should not be started until the risk has been
reduced. Considerable resources shall be allocated to reduce
IV NC Intolerable
the risk. Where the risk involves work in progress, urgent action
(within 3 working days, min. admin control) shall be taken
Efforts shall be made to reduce the risk.
III PC Significant Risk reduction measures shall be implemented
within a defined time period (6 months)
8 - 16 Work should not be started until the risk has been
reduced. Considerable resources shall be allocated to reduce
IV NC Intolerable
the risk. Where the risk involves work in progress, urgent action
(within 3 working days, min. admin control) shall be taken
Work should not be started until the risk has been
reduced. Considerable resources shall be allocated to reduce
20 - 25 I-III NC Intolerable
the risk. Where the risk involves work in progress, urgent action
(within 3 working days, min. admin control) shall be taken