Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
NURS 3241
Quality Improvement Project Proposal Worksheet July 23, 2019
Project
Goal Develop a standardized referral process between specialty care practices within the organization
Keep in mind the IOM Quality Goals: Safe, Timely, Efficient, Effective, Equitable, Patient Centered (STEEEP) , Magnet Standard
Team
Members Nurses, specialty care practice administrators/managers, practice physicians, health system administration
Identify your team members.
Because patients are being lost to specialty care follow-up due to inconsistency in referral processes
Module 1
between practices.
Observations made:
Data to support - What are some -Each practice has a different process for handling referrals: some require both electronic and faxed copies of the same referrals, some require
electronic referral and faxed copies of patient demographics, some process electronic referrals only, while other process faxed paper referrals only.
observations you have made? What -If a provider is not designated in an electronic referral, it goes into a referral “bank" where it is left unaddressed for extended periods of time,
are some of the factors that stand in causing delay in contacting patients
Factors that stand in the way:
the way? -No administrative support to develop consistent method -insufficient staff to monitor referrals
-Cost associated with making changes to electronic medical record system (EMR) for referral process -lack of standard protocols
Of the selected sample of 25 referrals sent from our practice to specialty care practices within the
organization, including cardiology, maternal fetal medicine, and general surgery, 9 referrals either had a
Outcome Data – How prevalent is significant delay in scheduling the patient or patient's were not scheduled at all requiring our staff to call
the problem? Provide results here the specialty practices and get patient's scheduled over the phone. This sample of resulted in 36% of
referrals that did not get completed appropriately.
literature: title, author, intervention, Closing the Loop: A Guide to Safer Ambulatory Referrals in the EHR Era by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI). A focus
group study was performed which found four common breakdowns in the referral process and identified common causes of
sample, details, results & your own malpractice claims related to incomplete referrals. Additionally, a 9-step “loop” process was developed to help close the gap in the
comments. referral process. This document provides excellent guidelines for how to address potential barriers at each of the 9 steps.
Evidence from industry – Find evidence Use of an Electronic Referral System to Improve the Outpatient Primary Care-Specialty Care Interface by The Agency for
from other institutions or the industry: Healthcare Research and Quality. Hospital: University of California San Francisco – San Francisco General Hospital.
what are others doing that would support Developed “eReferral”, an electronic web-based referral system where referring physician fills out internet form with patients
relevant history and reason(s) for consult. The system automatically extracts pertinent patient information from the EHR, links
your goals? it to the request and submits the referral to the specialty practice. A referral reviewed is designated by each practice to review
and monitor all referrals.
Provide the following for TWO sources:
title, hospital/organization, intervention, Implementation Science Workshop: Implementation of an Electronic Referral System in a Large Academic Medical Center by
Barnett et al. Discusses successful implementation of “eReferral” in Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, MA. Also
population, details, results & your own
provides several “Teaching Points” that provides areas of further consideration when implementing such a system.
comments.
Step 3A – Understanding the Process (Context – readiness to change, evidence of teamwork, quality culture)
Directions: Review each principle that determines readiness for change. Score a principle “yes” if you believe you have established support and
Module 2
readiness.
If you have not achieved support, redefine your opportunity and realign your strategies.
(Note: re-evaluating and re-scoring is not necessary for the assignment, but it would benefit your project.)
When all criteria is scored as a “yes” you should proceed with your improvement strategy. As you continue, remember to:
1. Use the PDSA process with a focus on continuous evaluation and reflection. (Use only PD from PDSA cycle)
2. Follow the implementation process as a team
3. Measure effectiveness continuously
4. Market the outcomes to your team and the organization
5. Celebrate success
Define agreed upon project & goals: Do you Yes, organizational administrators, practice administrators, and physicians all agree with project and goals
have senior leadership buy-in? Yes or no?
Yes; the process of submitting and monitoring electronic referrals between specialty care practices in the
Eliminate Blame: Have you defined the outpatient setting
process (not the people) that requires
redesign? Yes or no?
Yes; practice managers will utilize data available within the electronic medical record system to generate
Rely on Data: Have you defined data needs monthly reports of number of referrals sent, referrals received, and referrals completed. All uncompleted
and required support for data management referrals will be investigated to determine why they were not done.
and analysis? Yes or no?
Yes; nurses, medical assistants, practice managers, specialty care physicians, organization administrators
Team Approach: Have you defined an inter-
professional team creating a neutral problem
solving environment? Yes or no?
Include all levels of employees: Have you Yes; the initial refer begins with the physician deeming it necessary. The physician places the electronic referral (or
defined all employees involved in every level the nurse/MA places refer on verbal or written order). The referral goes to a designated referral coordinator for
Module 6
of process? Yes or no? receiving specialty care practice. Referral coordinator calls patient to schedule follow-up and marks referral in
process. Patient is seen for follow-up care by specialty provider who closes the loop by marking referral complete.
EMR system automatically generates summary report from visit and sends to original referring provider.
Yes:
Economic Support: Have you identified -Designated employee for each specialty practice who functions as referral coordinator; may be existing employee if job roles can
economic needs of the project, including accommodate expanded tasks and time commitment
time, personnel and financial support? Yes or -Financial resources for hiring referral coordinators if necessary
-Financial resources for potential minor adjustments to existing electronic referral system
no? -Time for monthly meetings of team members to assess success or failures of process and make adjustments as necessary
Yes; of all the employees, managers, physicians, and administrators who the project was discussed with
Celebrate Success 2: Have you obtained buy- agreed there were major flaws in the current referral system and looked forward to seeing how the new
in for celebration of success? Yes or no? changes could improve the referral process.
Step 3B – Understanding the Process (Diagnosis of system performance, process map, fishbone diagram)
Module1
Fishbone Diagram - We use fishbone diagrams to help identify what caused a particular event to occur. Begin by placing the event at the head of the fish.
Then think about the causes of this event as they relate to each of six categories: People, Methods, Machines, Materials, Measurements, and Environment.
Sample
Timeline:
Literature & Organizational Process Specific Aim Data Identification of Data Collection: Storyboard
Industry Readiness Diagram & Collection: Change Strategy & Post-Pilot Study
Assessment Fishbone Baseline Implementation
Module 6
The operational definition identifies uncompleted patient referrals as those that do not meet the following criteria:
Outcome Measure: Identify the operational Those that are called and scheduled within 24 hours for urgent referrals and 72 hours for routine referrals
AND
definition: how will you measure?
The patient is seen and evaluated by specialty care physician.
Module 3
Step 6 – Identify and Choose Change Idea (What changes can we make that will result in an improvement?)
Directions: Fill out the table below. Enter a change idea then answer yes or no to each question in that row. Give a point for each “yes” response
and include the total
` number of points for the change idea in the “total” column.
Advantage
Evidence to Available Easy to New
Change Idea Over Current Total
Support? Resources? Implement? Innovation?
Process?
Module 6
Process Measure: Identify the operational This will be measured using data reports generated by the
definition: how will you measure? electronic health record system to determine the percentage of
total referrals that are actually recorded as attempted to schedule
or scheduled.
Balancing Measure: Identify the balancing A balancing measure for this proposal is:
measure: are changes to improve one part of Is the designation of a referral coordinator causing disconnect
the system causing new problems in other between the provider’s knowledge of the status of the referral?
areas?
Balancing Measure: Identify the operational Upon a test of change, subjective surveys will be conductive to
definition: how will you measure? assess the provider’s opinion on the use of referral coordinators to
help in the referral process.
Step 6:
Change Idea Evidence to Available Easy to New Advantage Over Total
Support? Resources? Implement Innovation Current Process?
? ?
Implement completely different referral yes yes no no no 2
system
Convert back to non-electronic (paper) no yes yes no no 2
referrals via fax
Update electronic referral system to yes yes yes no yes 4
reflect standardized referral process for all
practices but do not use referral
coordinator
Update electronic referrals system to be yes yes yes yes yes 5
standardized and include referral
coordinator
Appendix
Assess Team Assess Perform Implement Review first Team Implement Final roll-
referral meeting for specialty EHR update referral data on meeting to change ideas out of
practices referrals: #sent,
process project to reflect process #received, brainstorm referral
from an design plan readiness and any changes change methods to process
#completed per
acceptance of
individual necessary to practice; eliminate
change evaluate
practice support causes of
incomplete
referral referrals for
incomplete
process cause referrals
Aug. 1, 2019 Sept. 1, 2019 Sept. 15, Sept. 30, Oct. 1, 2019 Nov. 1, 2019 Nov. 5, 2019 Dec. 1, 2019 Jan. 1, 2019
2019 2019
References
Barnett, M., Mehrotra, A., Frolkis, J., Spinks, M., Steiger, C., Hehir, B., Greenberg, J., & Singh,
Bell, D., Straus, S., Wu, S., Chen, A., & Kushel, M. (2012). Use of an Electronic Referral
System to Improve the Outpatient Primary Care – Specialty Care Interface. (AHRQ
Publication No. 11(12)-0096-EF). Retrieved from Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality Website:
https://healthit.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/citation/ereferralimplementationreportfina
l.pdf
Gandhi, T. (2017). Improve the Referral Process, Improve Safety. Retrieved from
http://www.ihi.org/communities/blogs/improve-the-referral-process-improve-safety
http://www.improvingprimarycare.org/work/referral-management
Institute for Healthcare Improvement/National Patient Safety Foundation. (2017). Closing the
Loop: A Guide to Safer Ambulatory Referrals in the EHR Era. Retrieved from Institute
http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Publications/Closing-the-Loop-A-Guide-to-Safer-
Ambulatory-Referrals.aspx