Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
HRD
Coaching and Mentoring
Coursework assignment
Business research
1
Table of Content
1. Preface........................................................................................................................3
2. Introduction................................................................................................................4
2.1 Glance on Coaching:............................................................................................4
2.2 Glance on Mentoring:...........................................................................................5
2.3 What to Opt …… Coaching or Mentoring??.......................................................5
2
In this assignment, we have studied about the coaching and mentoring. In today’s fast
higher production. Every organization needs to adopt such methods that will increase
its productivity and its profit. Changes in technology or to keep the pace to the
organizations use mentoring and some use coaching to train their staff.
This assignment will guide us the differences between both training techniques. And
this assignment will also speak expressively; whether organizations go for mentoring
or coaching. Which ‘Human Resource Technique’ will entail the specified results.
Assignment will talk about the coaching and mentoring in an organisational level
3
Human resource development is to develop the employees to get the best out of them
and to train and to develop the skills of individual and to improve the quality of work.
So for training and development the two methods are the coaching and mentoring.
know to environment and to teach them how to perform their work in an organisation.
Coaching is done in different ways like seminars ,classrooms etc. whereas mentoring
is the on course of the job training it is done to develop the employees who are
already working and know the environment of the workplace and what is their duty.
Mentoring is done to improve the skills of the employees who on their course of job
and to help them in improving their work performance to get the work done in best
possible way, so that there is reduction in wastage time, money and stock. Therefore
organization should be aware of their needs and these organizations should know
another person to aid in their learning development. They provide their personal
Coaching does not just benefit those whose performance is not satisfactory but also
only a short term process in the workplace and can be performed internally by co-
structured and often just focused on one task such as customer service. “Coaching was
4
designed to enhance the development of employees with particular emphasis on the
transfer of learning from formal training courses into workplace activity.”(Bratton and
formal than coaching although has became more formal in some modern
employee and so the process is carried out internally. It is based on the personal
development of the junior employee and aims to give that person the guidance and
aspects of the job, mentoring focuses more on improving the employees fit within the
based on people and the development of attitudes toward the organisation, and this
assessment should be made of how much it is needed and if there is a critical business
need for it. There should be clear aims of what the organisation want to get out of
coaching and mentoring. Management must be prepared to give their backing but all
who are involved must be willing to take part. “The moves towards a more learner-
centred approach to training and development and the increasing use of coaching as a
development tool have significant implications for the role of training practitioners. It
is likely to demand greater co-operation between trainers and line managers, and
5
In order for organisations to facilitate coaching and mentoring as an approach to
and their trainees. They must be able to communicate with one another and there must
be willingness on both sides to learn from on another and listen to each other ideas
and beliefs. Trainers and trainees must have a degree of trust in each other in order for
them to take on board what each other are saying. Often it is partnerships that have a
lot in common, such as traits and aspirations, which are the most successful and get
the most out of this type of learning. Having similar interests, ideas and backgrounds
is very much a one-step-at a time process, requiring some initial mutual identification
before gains are made.” (Blanchard and Thacker, Effective Training, 1999, 309)
Mentors and coaches are usually mature, experienced people, and in the case of
mentors are usually senior managers who are not line managers although they may
seniority are indeed at an advantage in being able to deliver better career prospects,
but this seems to depend on an element of mentee selection or the partnership being
based on some mutual personal predisposition.” (Study 3.4 Mullen E. Vocational and
coaching and mentoring then are to have someone of seniority and with a lot of
6
However in order for coaching and mentoring to be successful both the person being
coached or mentored and the actual coach or mentor must want to take part in this
type of learning. If the learner is instructed to take part in the coaching or mentoring
and has not volunteered for it they may resent this fact and therefore not wish to take
part. Being forced to take part will often mean that the employee will not get the full
benefit from the learning scheme and will not strike up the critical relationship with
the mentor or the coach. Employees must want to learn in order for them to learn from
Coaches and mentors must also want to help others learn and pass on their knowledge
and experience. “Not only do trainees need to be motivated to learn, trainers need to
be motivated to train”. (Blanchard and Thacker, Effective Training, 1999, 357) One
way to motivate trainers and mentors is to make this role a type of promotion within
the organisation, to make it a high-status role with bonuses, for example more money.
It is easier when coaches or mentors come into the organisation externally as their job
is solely to mentor or to coach and so they are already motivated and trained. It is
more difficult for coaches and mentors internal to the organisation as they may have
to perform their usual work role as well as their role as a coach or mentor. “The
important thing to remember is that someone who is training another employee should
not.”(Blanchard and Thacker, Effective Training, 1999, 357) If coaches and mentors
have too heavy a workload this may greatly inhibit the effectiveness of workplace
learning; coaches and mentors must be granted enough time to fulfil these roles.
7
Finding the right people to become mentors and coaches is essential for these types of
learning within the contemporary workplace. The people who they are coaching and
mentoring will look up to them and seek guidance from them. The people selected for
coaching and mentoring must be enthusiastic about the role but have thorough
knowledge of the job and be able to communicate well with others. The coach or
mentor must be encouraging and helpful towards the person learning from them. If the
wrong people are picked for the roles of coaches and mentors then the learning will
not succeed. The people who are best at their jobs are not always the ones who are
best at passing on their knowledge to others. “You need to choose an employee who
has a solid work ethic and correctly models the appropriate behaviours you want
In the study of Investmentco (Gibb, Learning and Development, 2002) many issues
had affected the success of mentoring in the workplace. Unclear aims had led to
reduce the risk of confusion. The matching of mentors to mentees had not been
assessed efficiently it was simply based on what staff were available. The matching of
coaches and mentors to suitable partners in workplace leaning is essential and perhaps
the most critical factor of it being a success. Unsatisfactory training was given to the
mentors in this case study resulting in little evaluation of the mentoring and no
and coaches is important so that they know exactly how to go about helping others
learn and to know when learning is no longer required. The study shows some of the
factors that inhibit mentoring but if rectified can turn mentoring into a success.
8
The cost of coaching and mentoring may deter some organisations from using it as a
learning method. Most internal coaches and mentors will need some form of initial
training in how to perform these roles properly, costing the organisation money and
time. External coaches and mentors fees could also be very expensive for the
organisation. The one-on-one element of this type of learning means that the process
will take longer and require more people to coach and mentor. There is also the issue
of reduced productivity in the workplace if people (especially those who are highly
skilled) are taking part in learning partnerships as well as their everyday tasks.
However with coaching and mentoring employees are still in the workplace and
working to a certain extent. This is a reason why organisations may choose coaching
or mentoring over other forms of learning as employees are still producing products
or services while learning or teaching at the same time. It may also cut costs as no
additional equipment or materials are required as they are already in the workplace
3. Bibliography
9
Blanchard P.N. and Thacker J.W. (1999) Effective Training, Systems,
PP.309-357
Bratton J. and Gold J., (2003), Human Resource Management Theory and
Study 3.4
Pasloe and Rolph, Coaching; savior or just a fad? Popular new focus on
10