Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
A class transcription from the lectures of Atty. Raymund Christian S. Ong Abrantes, CPA
ATENEO DE DAVAO UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW
FEB 19: ALABAN AN ACT PROVIDING FOR THE REGULATION OF
THE ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS OF
Some of the laws that we will discuss are actually THRIFT BANKS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
important to the bar exam. Most of the questions in
banking come from AMLA, Bank Secrecy Deposit CHAPTER I
Law. Although it is not a banking law, I will also DECLARATION OF POLICY AND DEFINITIONS
discuss the data privacy law; in fact, in the previous
bar exam, there was a question asked and it was Section 1. Title. — This Act shall be known and cited
“what are the rights of a data subject?” Moreover, as the "Thrift Banks Act of 1995."
because of the Facebook scandal in 2015/2016
and social media, it becomes important for a Sec. 2. Declaration of Policy. —
certain country to have a data privacy law. The It is hereby declared the policy of the State to:
European countries developed the GDPR law; (a) Recognize the indispensable role of the private
before kasi kanya kanyaa ang laws nila. sector, to encourage private enterprise, and to
provide incentives to needed investments;
By the way, what is the different between an EU (b)Promote economic development pursuant to
directive or EU regulation? A directive or a the socioeconomic program of the government,
regulation? to expand industrial and agricultural growth, to
encourage the establishment of more private
A regulation is a binding legislative act. It must be thrift banks in order to meet the needs for
applied in its entirety across the EU. capital, personal and investment credit or
medium- and long-term loans for Filipino
A directive is a legislative act that sets out a goal entrepreneurs;
that all EU countries must achieve. However, it is up (c) Encourage and assist the establishment of thrift
to the individual countries to devise their own laws bank system which will promote agriculture and
on how to reach these goals. (source: europa.eu) industry and at the same time place within easy
reach of the people the medium-and long-term
They have the GPDR Law and we have the Data credit facilities at reasonable cost;
Privacy Act. Our own law established a mechanism (d)Encourage industry, frugality and the
for you to complain… for example, pag feeling mo accumulation of savings among the public, and
ginamit yung credit card information, you can the members and stockholders of thrift banks;
actually file a complaint with the Commission in and
charge of that and they can investigate that. If there (e) Regulate and supervise the activities of thrift
is a merchant, for example bumili ka sa kanila, then banks in order to place their operations on a
they share your information, you can actually file a sound, stable and efficient basis and to curtail or
complaint against the merchant, but I have yet to prevent acts or practices which are prejudicial to
see a case wherein the Commission really enforced the public interest.
or penalized those merchants. Still, it’s a good law.
The policy of the state in enacting this law is “to
The House already approved of allowing foreign encourage private enterprise, and to provide
equity ownership for public service. We incentives to needed investments”. For example
distinguish public utility form public service. So, you want to get a loan for whatever reason, medyo
remember Rappler? Per se hindi naman sya illegal; madali makakuha ng loan if it’s a thrift bank.
what makes it illegal is that there’s that condition
in the PDRs (Philippine Depositary Receipts). Now, Sec. 3. Definition of Terms. — For purposes of
the quo warranto case opens the field of whether implementing this Act, the following definitions
or not PDR is illegal per se. Because of that house shall apply:
approval, I don’t think there is a need for PDRs
because kung pwede nang maka own ang foreign (a) "Thrift banks" shall include savings and
entities and di na kailangan ng PDR. mortgage banks, private development banks, and
stock savings and loans associations organized
under existing laws, and any banking corporation
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 7906 that may be organized for the following purposes:
(e) Any bank not organized under this Act and any Sec. 25. Annual Fees. — Consistent with the
person, association, or corporation doing the provisions of Section 28 of Republic Act No. 7653,
business of banking, not authorized under this Act any thrift bank organized under this Act may,
or existing laws which shall use the words pursuant to regulations promulgated for the
"Development Bank," "Savings Bank," "Mortgage purpose by the Monetary Board, be required to
Bank," "Savings and Mortgage Bank," or "Savings contribute to the Bangko Sentral an annual fee in
and Loan Association," as part of the name or title an amount to be determined by the Monetary
of such bank or of such person, association, or Board.
corporation, shall be punished by a fine of not less
than One hundred pesos (P100), but in no case to Sec. 26. Implementation. — For the purpose of
exceed Thirty thousand pesos (P30,000), for each carrying the objectives of this Act, the Bangko
day during which the said words are so used. Sentral is authorized to require the services and
facilities of any department or instrumentality of
Sec. 6. Loans or advances extended by rural banks The foreclosure of mortgage covering loans
organized and operated under this Act shall be granted by rural banks and executions of judgment
primarily for the purpose of meeting the normal thereon involving real properties levied upon by a
credit needs of farmers, fishermen or farm families sheriff shall be exempt from the publications in
owning or cultivating land dedicated to newspaper now required by law where the total
agricultural production as well as the normal credit amount of loan, excluding interest due and unpaid,
needs of cooperatives and merchants. In granting does not exceed One hundred thousand pesos
of loans, the rural bank shall give preference to the (P100,000) or such amount as the Monetary Board
application of farmers and merchant whose cash may prescribe as may be warranted by prevailing
requirements are small. economic conditions. It shall be sufficient
publication in such cases if the notices of
Loans may be granted by rural banks on the foreclosure and execution of judgment are posted
security of lands without Torrens Title where the in the most conspicuous area of the municipal
owner of private property can show five (5) years building, the municipal public market, the rural
on more peaceful, continuous and uninterrupted bank, the barangay hall, the barangay public
possession in concept of owner; or of portions of market, if any, where the land mortgaged is
friar land estates or other lands administered by situated during the period of sixty (60) days
the Bureau of Lands that are covered by sales immediately preceding the public auction or
contracts and the purchase have paid at least five execution of judgment. Proof of publication as
(5) years installment thereon, without the necessity required herein shall be accomplished by an
of prior approval and consent by the Director of affidavit of the sheriff or officer conducting the
lands; or of portions of other estates under the foreclosure sale or execution of judgment and shall
administration of the Department of Agrarian be attached with the records of the case: Provided,
Reform or other government agency which are That when a homestead or free patent is
likewise covered by sales contracts and the foreclosed, the homesteader or free patent holder,
purchasers have paid at least five (5) years as well as his heirs shall have the right to redeem
installment thereon, without the necessity of prior the same within one (1) year from the date of the
approval and consent of the Department of registration of the foreclosure in the case of land
Agrarian Reform or corresponding government covered by a Torrens Title: Provided, finally, That in
agency; or of homesteads or free patent lands any case, borrowers, especially those who are
pending the issuance of titles but already mere tenants, need only to secure their loans with
approved, are issued, the provisions of any law or the procedure corresponding to their share.
regulations to the contrary notwithstanding:
Provided, That when the corresponding titles are A rural bank shall be allowed to foreclose lands
issued, the same shall be delivered to the Register mortgaged to it: Provided, That said lands shall be
of Deeds of the province where such lands are covered under Republic Act No. 6657.
situated to the annotation of the encumbrance:
Provided, further, That in the case of lands pending Discussion:
homestead of free patent titles, copies of notices
for the presentation of the final proof shall also be 1st paragraph: Kaya nga mas comprehensive
furnished the creditor rural bank and, if the yung purpose ng rural bank because it if for the
borrower applicants fail to present the final proof rural development. So kung ikaw, nagborrow ka ng
within thirty (30) days from date of notice, the money kasi gusto mo magdevelop ng building or
creditor rural bank may do so for them at their subdivision, you might not be granted because
expense: Provided, furthermore, That the your purpose must be for agriculture, production,
applicant for homestead or free patent has already farmers, fishermen or farm families and the normal
made improvements on the land and the loan credit needs of cooperatives and merchants.
applied for is to be used for further development Pwede naman magborrow yung negosyante but it
of the same or for other productive economic must be for the normal credit needs, hindi yung
activities: Provided, finally, That the appraisal and capital purposes.
verification of the status of a land is a full
responsibility of the rural bank and any loan
granted on any land which shall be found later to
f. Rediscount paper with the Philippine National 4. Overvalue or aid in overvaluing any security for
Bank, the Land Bank of the Philippines, the the purpose of influencing in any way the action of
Development Bank of the Philippines, or any other the bank on any loan; or
banking institution, including its branches and
5. Appear and sign as guarantor, indorser, or
agencies. Said institution shall specify the nature of
surety for loans granted; or
paper deemed acceptable for rediscount, as well
as the rediscount rate to be charged by any of 6. Violate any of the provisions of this Act.
these institutions;
b. Any applicant for a loan from, or borrower of a
g. Offer other banking service as provided in rural bank who shall:
Section 72 of Republic Act No. 337, as amended,
1. Misuse, misapply, or divert the proceeds of the
and
loan obtained by him from its declared purpose; or
h. Extend financial assistance to public and private
2. Fraudulently overvalue property offered as
employees in accordance with the provisions of
security for loan from said bank; or
Section 5 of Republic Act No. 3779, as amended.
3. Give out or furnish false misrepresentation of
With written permission of the Monetary Board of
material facts for the purpose of obtaining,
the Central bank, any rural bank may act as trustee
renewing, or increasing a loan or extending the
over estates or properties of farmer and
period thereof; or
merchants.
4. Attempt to defraud the said bank in the event of
Nothing in this section shall be construed as
court action to recover a loan; or
precluding a rural bank from performing, with prior
approval of the Monetary Board, all the services 5. Offer any officer, employee, or agent of a rural
authorized and mortgage banks, of for commercial bank as a gift, fee, commission, or other form of
banks, under an expanded banking authority as compensation in order to influence such bank
provided in Section 21-B of the same Act. personality in approving an application; or
Now, who supervises the cooperative banks? "(a) Individual members of the bank’s member-
primary cooperatives; and
Still the BSP.
"(b) Samahang Nayon and Municipal Katipunan ng
ARTICLE. 96. Supervision. – The cooperative banks mga Samahang Nayon (MKSN) which held
registered under this Code shall be under the common shares of cooperative banks prior to the
supervision of the BSP. effectivity of this Act shall apply for conversion to
The BSP, upon consultation with the Authority and full-pledged cooperatives in order to maintain
the concerned cooperative sector, shall formulate their status as regular members of cooperative
guidelines regarding the operations and the banks: Provided, That they shall notify the
governance of cooperative banks. These cooperative bank concerned their intention to
guidelines shall give due recognition to the unique convert within a period of ninety (90) days from the
nature and character of cooperative banks. To this effectivity of this Act.
end, cooperative banks shall provide financial and Samahang Nayon and MKSN are hereby given a
banking services to its members. period of one (1) year from the effectivity of this Act
to complete their conversion as cooperatives.
Cooperative bank shall exert reasonable efforts to
How do you organize a cooperative bank? inform their member Samahang Nayon and MKSN
to finally convert or to give the notice of conversion
within the prescribed period. Upon the failure of
ARTICLE. 100. Powers, Functions and Allied What is the policy of the State for the establishment
Undertakings of Cooperative Banks. – of non-stock savings and loan associations?
The purpose is for members to borrow money Are there incentives? Yes, of course!
(referring to provident funds).
SECTION 5. Tax exemption. —
These nonstock saving and loan association, these
An Association shall be exempt from payment of
are actually catered to an association. Mostly these
tax in respect to income it receives, including
are employees of the same company. It’s like a
interest on its deposits with any bank:
provident fund. For those who have worked, it’s
like a provident fund wherein when one employee Provided, however, That income derived from any
dies the money goes to him. It’s similar to that. of its properties, real or personal, or any activity
(2019 tsn) conducted for profit, regardless of the disposition
thereof, is subject to the corresponding internal
So, how do you organize that?
revenue taxes imposed under the National Internal
At least (5) but not more than (15) members of a Revenue Code.
well-defined group as provided herein may form
Interest earnings on deposits of members with
an Association under this Act. An Association, prior
Associations as well as the shares of its members
to transacting any business, shall secure a license
from the net income of the Associations shall be
from the Monetary Board and register with the
exempt from income tax.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Ang gagawin ng associations, kukunin ang savings
nyo. Ide-deposit nila, so that is tax free.
The Association shall confine its membership to a
well-defined group of persons and shall not SECTION 7. Powers of Associations. —
transact business with the general public. The Association shall accept deposits from and
So, why do we have to discuss this even if it is not a grant loans only to its members, subject to such
bank? Because it functions similar to a bank. The rules and regulations as the Monetary Board may
difference is it does not obtain deposits. You have promulgate to ensure sound, stable and efficient
to be in a well-defined group. operation: Provided, That no deposits shall be
sourced or deducted from the loans granted to a
It is an association. So, under the supervision of the member without his or her written consent. The
SEC. loans shall not exceed the members' deposits and
contributions in the Association, plus twelve (12)
For example, employee ka ni Coca-cola. Well-
months of his regular salary as the Association may
defined group:
allow or seventy percent (70%) of the fair market
“A "well-defined group" shall be defined by value of any property acceptable as collateral on
the Monetary Board, and shall consist of, first mortgage that he may offer as security:
but not be limited to, any of the following— Provided, That no loan shall have the maturity date
of more than five (5) years, except loans on the
1) employees, officers, and directors of one
security of unencumbered real estate for the
company, including member-retirees;
purpose of home building and home
e) maintain deposits with banks: Provided, That What is the PDIC? Is governmanet instrumentality
the amount of such deposits shall be subject to the to insure the deposits of all banks which are
loan limit to a single borrower as prescribed herein entitled to the benefits of insurance.
or by other special laws or regulations;
So, we have discussed already the different types 4. Deposits that are determined to be
of banks. All deposits nun – deposits of their proceeds of an unlawful activity as
depositors are covered by PDIC. defined under the Anti-Money
Laundering Law.
Now, this is very important: What if the bank
has deposits outside the country – mayroon Now, equally important (as this has been asked in
siyang “branch”? the recent Bar exam in Commercial Law) is this
question: What is “splitting of deposits”?
As for Philippine banks with
branches outside the country, RA 9576 Splitting of deposits is actually under the topic of
stipulates that subject to the approval of Insured deposits. The tendency in practice is this:
the Board of Directors, any insured bank Alam mong may 500,000PhP coverage ka. So,
with a branch outside the Philippines ginawa mo, hinati mo yung deposits – nag-“splitting
MAY elect to include for insurance its of deposits” ka, because you thought that you can
deposit obligations payable at such get 500,000 PhP per deposit. So, yung isang hati ng
branch. deposit nakapangalan sa kapitbahay; ang isa pang
hati, nakapangalan sa kapitbahay mo. Ginawa mo
So, the insurance coverage of the deposits yan para lang (in the event) na magsarado ang
pertaining to such branches outside the bangko, you’ll get PhP500,000 for each deposit.
Philippines, is OPTIONAL.
Section 26(f)(1)(e) of RA 3591, as amended,
Foreign currency deposits are provides:
also insured by PDIC pursuant to RA Splitting of deposits occurs whenever a
6426 (“An Act Instituting A Foreign deposit account with an outstanding balance of
Currency Deposit System In The more than the statutory maximum amount of
Philippines, And For Other Purposes”)
TRANSCRIBED BY 3-MANRESA [2019-2020]
Mana-ay, Tan, B., Paulma, Estremos, Talon, Dela Cerna, Bajao, Manligoy, Alaban, Pizarro, Villavicencio, Banosan,
Aberilla, Reyes (Special Thanks to Lara De los Santos)
18
BANKING AND OTHER COMMERCIAL LAWS
A class transcription from the lectures of Atty. Raymund Christian S. Ong Abrantes, CPA
ATENEO DE DAVAO UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW
insured deposit maintained under the name of Pesos) with the different Legacy Banks; and 142 of
natural or juridical persons is broken down and these accounts (amounting to over 20 million
transferred into two (2) or more accounts in the Pesos) were in the names of helpers and rank-and-
name/s of natural or juridical persons or entities file employees of the Gidwani spouses. Thus,
who have no beneficial ownership on transferred according to PDIC, most of them if not all, did not
deposits in their names within one hundred twenty have the financial capacity to deposit the amounts
(120) days immediately preceding or during a recorded under their names, let alone make the
bank-declared bank holiday, or immediately deposits in various Legacy Banks located
preceding a closure order issued by the Monetary nationwide. PDIC also noted that advance interests
Board of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas for the on several of the deposits were paid to the Gidwani
purpose of availing of the maximum deposit spouses even though they are not the named
insurance coverage. owners of the accounts.
So, what you have to remember here is the
beneficial ownership. Kapag walang beneficial Pursuant to its mandate to safeguard the
ownership – hindi entitled sa insurance over the deposit insurance fund against illegal schemes and
deposit. machinations, PDIC lodged a criminal complaint
against the Gidwani spouses and the 86 other
individuals, before the Department of Justice
PDIC v. Manu GIDWANI (DOJ) Task Force on Financial Fraud (DOJ Task
GR No. 234616 Force) for:
June 20, 2018 1. Estafa through falsification under Art.
THIRD DIVISION (Velasco, Jr., J.) 315(2)(a) in relation to Art. 172(1) and
Facts: 171(4) of the Revised Penal Code; and
Pursuant to several resolutions of the 2. Money laundering as defined in Section
Monetary Board (MB) of the BSP, a number of the 4(a) of AMLA.
rural banks owned and controlled by the Legacy
Group of Companies (Legacy Banks, for brevity) On January 14, 2014, the DOJ Task Force
were ordered closed and thereafter placed under promulgated a Resolution dismissing the
the receivership of Philippine Deposit Insurance Complaint. PDIC's motion for reconsideration from
Corporation (PDIC). the said Resolution was likewise denied.
The spouses Gidwani, and eighty-six (86) Unperturbed, PDIC interposed a petition for
other individuals, represented themselves to be review with the Office of the Secretary of Justice
owners of four hundred seventy-one (471) deposit (SOJ).
accounts with the Legacy Banks, and filed claims
with PDIC. The claims were processed and On September 11, 2015, then Undersecretary
granted, resulting in the issuance of six hundred of Justice Jose F. Justiniano issued a Resolution
eighty-three (683) Landbank checks in favor of the (Justiniano Resolution) denying PDIC's appeal.
86 individuals, excluding the spouses Gidwani, in
the aggregate amount of over 98 million Pesos. On June 3, 2016, then SOJ Emmanuel Caparas,
however, overturned the Justianio Resolution
The individuals did not deposit the crossed through his own ruling granting PDIC's motion for
checks in their respective bank accounts. Rather, reconsideration (Caparas Resolution). In his
the face value of all the checks were credited to a Resolution, then SOJ Caparas directed the
single bank account with Rizal Commercial Prosecutor General to file the relevant Informations
Banking Corporation (RCBC) owned by Manu against the spouses Gidwani and the 86 other
Gidwani. individuals.
According to PDIC, it only discovered the Manu Gidwani immediately elevated the
foregoing circumstance when the checks were matter to the Court of Appeals, ascribing grave
cleared and returned to it. This prompted PDIC to abuse of discretion on the part of SOJ Caparas in
conduct an investigation on the true nature of the finding probable cause to charge him with estafa
deposit placements of the 86 individuals. Based on and for violation of the AMLA.
available bank documents, the spouses Gidwani
and the 86 individuals maintained a total of 471 The Court of Appeals reversed the decision of
deposit accounts (aggregating to over 118 million SOJ Caparas. Te CA ruled that SOJ Caparas
SECTION 2. All deposits of whatever nature with In addition, RA 7080 itself states that plunder is a
banks or banking institutions in the Philippines case that involves unexplained wealth since
including investments in bonds issued by the plunder is a crime where any public officer xxx
Government of the Philippines, its political amasses, accumulates or acquires ill-gotten wealth
subdivisions and its instrumentalities, are hereby xxx (Section 2). In addition, Section 1(d) even
considered as of an absolutely confidential nature provides that one of the overt or criminal acts is
and may not be examined, inquired or looked into bribery, which means bribery is essentially among
by any person, government official, bureau or the criminal acts of plunder. Plunder being thus
office, except upon written permission of the analogous to bribery, the exception to R.A. 1405
depositor, or in cases of impeachment, or upon applicable in cases of bribery must also apply to
order of a competent court in cases of bribery or cases of plunder
dereliction of duty of public officials, or in cases
where the money deposited or invested is the
subject matter of the litigation. Another issue: WON the evidence obtained in
violation of this rule is inadmissible.
The phrase "of whatever nature" proscribes any
restrictive interpretation of "deposits." Moreover, it Held: Still admissible
is clear from the immediately quoted provision
that, generally, the law applies not only to money Petitioner's attempt to make the exclusionary rule
which is deposited but also to those which are applicable to the instant case fails. R.A. 1405, it
invested. This further shows that the law was not bears noting, nowhere provides that an unlawful
intended to apply only to "deposits" in the strict examination of bank accounts shall render the
sense of the word. Otherwise, there would have evidence obtained therefrom inadmissible in
been no need to add the phrase "or invested." evidence.
Clearly, therefore, R.A. 1405 is broad enough to
cover Trust Accounts. Section 5 of R.A. 1405 only states that "[a]ny
violation of this law will subject the offender upon
In the case at bar, two exceptions apply: conviction, to an imprisonment of not more than
1. The examination of bank accounts is upon order five years or a fine of not more than twenty
of a competent course in cases of bribery and thousand pesos or both, in the discretion of the
dereliction of duty of public officials; and court."
2. The money deposited or invested is the subject
matter of litigation. Even assuming arguendo, however, that the
exclusionary rule applies in principle to cases
FOLLOW-UP QUESTION: involving R.A. 1405, the Court finds no reason to
apply the same in this particular case. Clearly, the
Q: How about the contention that plunder is not "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine presupposes
among the exceptions under Section 2? a violation of law. If there was no violation of R.A.
1405 in the instant case, then there would be no
A: In Philippine National Bank v. Gancayco, the "poisonous tree" to begin with, and, thus, no
court ruled that “cases of unexplained wealth are reason to apply the doctrine.
similar to cases of bribery or dereliction of duty and
no reason is seen why these two classes of cases DISCUSSION:
cannot be excepted from the rule making bank
deposits confidential. The policy as to one cannot
PNB declined to reveal the records invoking Issue: WON the bank may be compelled to reveal
Section 2 in relation to Section 5 of RA 1405. the records.
SEC. 5. Any violation of this law will subject the Ruling: YES
offender upon conviction, to an imprisonment of
not more than five years or a fine of not more than Section 8 of the Anti-Graft Law amended Section 2
twenty thousand pesos or both, in the discretion of of RA 1405. The truth is that these laws are so
the court. repugnant to each other that no reconciliation is
possible. Thus, while Republic Act No. 1405
On the other hand, the prosecutors invoked provides that bank deposits are "absolutely
Section 8 of RA 3019 (Anti-Graft and Corrupt confidential x x x and [therefore] may not be
Practices Act). examined, inquired or looked into," except in
those cases enumerated therein, the Anti-Graft
SEC. 8. Dismissal due to unexplained wealth. If in Law directs in mandatory terms that bank deposits
accordance with the provisions of Republic Act shall be taken into consideration in the
Numbered One thousand three hundred seventy- enforcement of this section, notwithstanding any
nine, a public official has been found to have provision of law to the contrary. The only
acquired during his incumbency, whether in his conclusion possible is that section 8 of the Anti-
name or in the name of other persons, an amount Graft Law is intended to amend section 2 of
of property and/or money manifestly, out of Republic Act No. 1405 by providing an additional
proportion to his salary and to his other lawful exception to the rule against the disclosure of bank
income, that fact shall be a ground for dismissal or deposits.
removal. Properties in the name of the spouse and Indeed, it is said that if the new law is inconsistent
unmarried children of such public official, may be with or repugnant to the old law, the presumption
taken into consideration, when their acquisition against the intent to repeal by implication is
through legitimate means cannot be satisfactorily overthrown because the inconsistency or
shown. Bank deposits shall be taken into repugnancy reveals an intent to repeal the existing
consideration in the enforcement of this section, law. And whether a statute, either in its entirety or
notwithstanding any provision of law to the in part, has been repealed by implication is
contrary. ultimately a matter of legislative intent.
Under threats of prosecution, PNB filed an action With regard to the claim that disclosure would be
for declaratory judgment. PNB contends: contrary to the policy making bank deposits
confidential, it is enough to point out that while
1. The Anti-Graft Law (which took effect on section 2 of Republic Act No. 1405 declares bank
August 17, 1960) is a general law which cannot be deposits to be "absolutely confidential" it
deemed to have impliedly repealed section 2 of
Mellon Bank then subpoenaed Erlinda Baylosis of UB sent the check for clearing. When the check was
the Philippine Veterans Bank to show that Azada presented for payment, a UB’s staff committed a
deposited HSBC checks No. 339736 and 339737 discrepancy when he under-encoded 1 million to 1
amounting to P874,490.75 in his personal current thousand. UB only discovered this 1 year later. UB
account with said bank. It also subpoenaed notified AB of the discrepancy by way of a charge
Pilologo Red, Jr. of Hongkong & Shanghai Banking slip amounting to 999,999 for automatic debiting
Corporation to prove that said amount was against AB. AB refused to accept the charge slip
returned by Azada to Hagedorn. "since [the] transaction was completed per your
[Union Bank's] original instruction and client's
The testimonies of these witnesses were objected account is now insufficiently funded."
to by the defense on the grounds of res inter alios
acta, immateriality, irrelevancy and confidentiality. In a case filed against AB by UB for the payment of
999,999 before the PCHC Arbitration Committee,
Issue: W/N the admission of the testimonies UB filed a petition for the examination of the said
objected to would violate RA 1405 on the secrecy account. Denied by the RTC stating that case of
of bank deposits. Union Bank does not fall under any of the
foregoing exceptions to warrant a disclosure of or
Ruling: NO Private respondents' protestations that inquiry into the ledgers/books of account of Allied
to allow the questioned testimonies to remain on Checking Account; that the complaint filed before
record would be in violation of the provisions of the PCHC Arbitration Committee is not one for
Republic Act No. 1405 on the secrecy of bank bribery or dereliction of duty of public officials
deposits, is unfounded. much less is there any showing that the subject
matter thereof is the money deposited in the
Section 2 of said law allows the disclosure of bank account in question; that the complaint primarily
deposits in cases where the money deposited is hinges on the alleged deliberate violation by Allied
the subject matter of the litigation. Inasmuch as Bank Corporation of the provisions of the PCHC
Civil Case No. 26899 is aimed at recovering the Rule Book, Sec. 25.3, and as principal reliefs, it
amount converted by the Javiers for their own seeks for the recovery of amounts of money as a
Ruling: NO DISCUSSION:
How is this case different from the case of Mellon
The petition before this Court reveals that the true Bank?
purpose for the examination is to aid petitioner in
proving the extent of Allied Bank's liability. It states: In Mellon Bank, N.A. vs. Magsino, where the
petitioner bank inadvertently caused the transfer of
Indeed, to prove the allegations in its Complaint the amount of US$1,000,000.00 instead of only
before the PCHC Arbitration Committee, and to US$1,000.00, the Court sanctioned the
rebut private respondent's defense on the matter, examination of the bank accounts where part of the
petitioner needs to determine: money was subsequently caused to be deposited:
1. how long respondent Allied Bank had wilfully or “Inasmuch as the case was aimed at recovering the
negligently allowed the difference of P999,000.00 amount converted by the Javiers for their own
to be maintained in the subject account without benefit, necessarily, an inquiry into the
remitting the same to petitioner; whereabouts of the illegally acquired amount
extends to whatever is concealed by being held or
2. whether indeed the subject account was no recorded in the name of persons other than the
longer sufficiently funded when petitioner sent its one responsible for the illegal acquisition.”
charge slip for reimbursement to respondent bank
on May 7, 1991; and Clearly, Mellon Bank involved a case where the
money deposited was the subject matter of the
3. whether or not respondent Allied Bank's litigation since the money so deposited was the
actuations in refusing to immediately reimburse very thing in dispute.
the discrepancy was attended by good or bad
faith.
BSB GROUP v GO
In other words, only a disclosure of the pertinent
details and information relating to the transactions Facts: Petitioner, the BSB Group, is a duly
involving subject account will enable petitioner to organized domestic corporation presided by
prove its allegations in the pending Arbicom case. Bangayan. Respondent Sally Go is Bangayan’s wife,
who was employed in the company as a cashier.
In short, Union is fishing for information so it can
determine the culpability of Allied Bank and the Bangayan filed a complaint for qualified theft
amount of damages it can recover from the latter. against respondent alleging that several checks
It does not seek recovery of the very money (Php1.5M) were instead of depositing to the
contained in the deposit. The subject matter of the company’s coffers, she deposited to her personal
dispute may be the amount of P999,000.00 that account maintained at Security Bank and Trust
CANCIO vs CTA
FEB 26: ABERILLA G.R. No. 73882 October 22, 1987
FACTS:
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 6426 The records show that claimant Mrs. Rosa
Cancio while clearing through the Pre-
AN ACT INSTITUTING A FOREIGN CURRENCY Boarding Area of MIA with her husband
DEPOSIT SYSTEM IN THE PHILIPPINES, AND and three (3) children to board PR 306 for
FOR OTHER PURPOSES Hongkong, was apprehended with One
Hundred Two Thousand Nine Hundred
SECTION 2. Authority to Deposit
Dollars (US$102,900.00) in cash, six
Foreign Currencies. — Any person,
hundred dollars (US$600.00) in two
natural or juridical, may, in accordance
travelers checks, and one thousand five
with the provisions of this Act, deposit
hundred (Pl,500.00) Pesos. In view of
with such Philippine banks in good
claimant's failure, upon being required,
standing, as may, upon application, be
to present the Central Bank Authority, the
designated by the Central Bank for the
said currencies were accordingly
purpose, foreign currencies which are
confiscated.
acceptable as part of the international
reserve, except those which are required
Petitioner's unimpugned evidence shows
by the Central Bank to be surrendered in
that she was a foreign currency depositor
accordance with the provisions of
at the Philippine Commercial and
Republic Act Numbered Two hundred
Industrial Bank at Makati, Metro Manila,
sixty-five.
and that the subject foreign currency was
part of the total amount of
SECTION 3. Authority of Banks to US$116,000.00 she had withdrawn from
Accept Foreign Currency Deposits. — said bank from May 14 to 27, 1981 for her
The banks designated by the Central travel and medical expenses in the
Bank under Section two hereof shall have United States via Hongkong.
the authority:
(1) To accept deposits and to accept ISSUE: Whether or not the forfeiture is
foreign currencies in trust: Provided, That proper?
numbered accounts for recording and
servicing of said deposits shall be RULING: NO.
allowed;
(2) To issue certificates to evidence such It is true that in so far as the exportation
deposits; or taking out of foreign currency from the
(3) To discount said certificates; country is concerned, Central Bank
(4) To accept said deposits as collateral Circular No. 265, issued on November
for loans subject to such rules and 20, 1968, particularly paragraph 3
regulations as may be promulgated by thereof, mandates:
the Central Bank from time to time; and
TRANSCRIBED BY 3-MANRESA [2019-2020]
Mana-ay, Tan, B., Paulma, Estremos, Talon, Dela Cerna, Bajao, Manligoy, Alaban, Pizarro, Villavicencio, Banosan,
Aberilla, Reyes (Special Thanks to Lara De los Santos)
30
BANKING AND OTHER COMMERCIAL LAWS
A class transcription from the lectures of Atty. Raymund Christian S. Ong Abrantes, CPA
ATENEO DE DAVAO UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW
3. No person shall take out or export from Manila International Airport when she
the Philippines foreign currency or any was about to depart. As she had
other foreign exchange except as explained, however, she was unaware of
otherwise authorized by the Central this requirement. And if she had wrapped
Bank. her dollar currency inside a chocolate
box it was for "security reasons." Besides,
Similarly, Central bank Circular No. 534, as instructed in the Circular-Letter
issued on July 19, 1976, reiterates and abovequoted, it is the authorized
provides in Sec. 3 thereof as follows: depository bank which should advise its
depositors to carry with them the
Sec. 3. Unless specifically authorized certificate of withdrawal. At any rate,
by the Central Bank or allowed under respondent Court has found that
existing international agreements or petitioner has presented in evidence her
Central Bank regulations, no person shall foreign currency bank book3 and her
take or transmit or attempt to take or withdrawal cards.4 These may be
transmit foreign exchange, in any form considered as substantial compliance for
out of the Philippines only, through other purposes of this case.
persons, through the mails, or through
international carriers. The provisions of Indeed, given the underlying objective of
this Section shall not apply to tourists and the Foreign Currency Deposit Act, as
non-resident temporary visitors who are amended, which is to attract and invite
taking or sending out of the Philippines the deposit of foreign currencies which
their own foreign exchange brought in by are acceptable as part of the international
them. reserve in duly authorized banks in order
that they may be put into the stream of
However, peculiar to the present the banking system, it would be to defeat
controversy is the fact that, as stated the very purpose of the law to place
previously, petitioner is a foreign undue restrictions on the transferability
currency depositor. Relevant and of such funds. The countervailing effect
applicable to her is the following would be to discourage prospective
provision of the "Foreign Currency foreign currency depositors to the
Deposit Act of the Philippines" (Republic detriment of the banking system.
Act No. 6426, as amended), which took
effect upon its approval on April 4,1972: In fine, Central Bank Circulars Nos. 265
and 534 requiring prior Central Bank
SEC. 5. Withdrawability and authority for the taking out of the country
transferability of deposits. — There shall of foreign currency should not be made
be no restriction on the withdrawal by to encompass foreign currency
the depositor of his deposit or on the depositors whose rights are expressly
transferability of the same abroad except defined and guaranteed in a special law,
those arising from the contract between the Foreign Currency Deposit Act (RA
the depositor and the bank.11 (Emphasis 6426, as amended). As a foreign currency
Ours). depositor, therefore, petitioner cannot
be adjudged to have violated the
Under the foregoing provision, the aforestated Central Bank Circulars. It
transferability abroad of foreign currency follows that neither is there room for the
deposits is unrestricted. Only one application of Section 2530(f) of the Tariff
exception is provided for therein, which and Customs Code, as amended, which
is, any restriction " from the contract provides for the forfeiture of any article
between the depositor and the bank." and other objects, the exportation of
Neither is a Central Bank authority which is effected or attempted contrary
required for the transferability abroad of to law.
foreign currency deposits.
This is not to condone petitioner's failure
It is a fact that petitioner could not to declare the foreign currency she was
present a certificate of withdrawal at the carrying out of the country but just to
Take note that the ruling here is pro hac vice. What PRESIDENTIAL DECREE No. 679
does that mean? “For or on this occasion only.” AMENDING ACT NUMBERED THIRTY NINE
There is still no jurisprudence that clearly gives out HUNDRED AND THIRTY SIX, AN ACT
an exception to the confidentiality of foreign REQUIRING BANKS, TRUST CORPORATIONS,
currency deposits so be careful in citing this case. AND BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS,
SALVACION VS CENTRAL BANK TO TRANSFER UNCLAIMED BALANCES HELD
BY THEM TO THE TREASURER OF THE
DOCTRINE: RA 6426 was intended to PHILIPPINES AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
invite foreign investors, not to give
What if you have a deposit, tapos 10 years na
protection to accounts of foreign
criminals. nabakante, what happens to the deposit? Is it
forever there? After 10 years of it being dormant,
FACTS: Karen Salvacion was raped by a can you withdraw said deposits? —The answer is no
foreigner, Greg Northcott. The trial court because we have the Unclaimed Balances Law. So,
convicted Northcott, and awarded if there is no movement of your balances or your
damages to Karen. Properties of account balances in the bank for a certain time or
Northcott were to be levied to pay for the period, it will be forfeited in favor of the State.
damages, but the bank resisted, claiming
that under RA 6426, foreign bank So, what are unclaimed balances?
deposits are exempt from garnishment,
“Sec. 1. “Unclaimed balances”, within
attachment, and levy.
the meaning of this Act, shall include
credits or deposits of money, bullion,
Petitioner then assails the
security or other evidence of
constitutionality of RA 6426, claiming that
indebtedness of any kind, and interest
it gives a substantial distinction to
thereon with banks, buildings and loan
foreigners, and provides a hiding place
associations, and trust corporations, as
for foreign offenders.
TRANSCRIBED BY 3-MANRESA [2019-2020]
Mana-ay, Tan, B., Paulma, Estremos, Talon, Dela Cerna, Bajao, Manligoy, Alaban, Pizarro, Villavicencio, Banosan,
Aberilla, Reyes (Special Thanks to Lara De los Santos)
34
BANKING AND OTHER COMMERCIAL LAWS
A class transcription from the lectures of Atty. Raymund Christian S. Ong Abrantes, CPA
ATENEO DE DAVAO UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW
hereinafter defined, in favor of any date of filing thereof: Provided, That
person known to be dead or who has immediately before filing the above
not made further deposits or sworn statement, the bank, building and
withdrawals during the preceding ten loan association, and trust corporation
years or more. Such unclaimed shall communicate with the person in
balances, together with the increase and whose favor the unclaimed balance
proceeds thereof, shall be deposited stands at his last known place of
with the Treasurer of the Philippines to residence or post office address.
the credit of the Government of the
Republic of the Philippines to be used as “It shall be the duty of the Treasurer of the
the National Assembly may direct. Philippines to inform the Solicitor
General from time to time the existence
of unclaimed balances held by banks,
But of course, the banks must follow procedures. building and loan associations, and trust
Di naman basta basta they will forfeit it in favor of corporations.
the government. May mga publication
requirement that they have to follow.
“Sec. 3. Whenever the Solicitor General
SWORN STATEMENT shall be informed of such unclaimed
balances, he shall commence an action
“Sec. 2. Immediately after the taking or actions in the name of the People of
effect of this Act and within the month of the Republic of the Philippines in the
January of every odd year, all banks, Court of First Instance of the province
building and loan associations, and trust or city where the bank, building and
corporations shall forward to the loan association or trust corporation is
Treasurer of the Philippines a statement, located, in which shall be joined as
under oath, of their respective managing parties the bank, building and loan
officers, of all credits and deposits held association or trust corporation and all
by them in favor of persons known to be such creditors or depositors. All or any of
dead, or who have not made further such creditors or depositors or banks,
deposits or withdrawals during the building and loan association or trust
preceding ten years or more, arranged in corporations may be included in one
alphabetical order according to the action. Service of process in such action
names of creditors and depositors, and or actions shall be made by delivery of a
showing: copy of the complaint and summons to
the president, cashier, or managing
“(a) The names and last known place of officer of each defendant bank, building
residence or post office addresses of the and loan association or trust corporation
persons in whose favor such unclaimed and by publication of a copy of such
balances stand; summons in a newspaper of general
“(b) The amount and the date of the circulation, either in English, in Filipino,
outstanding unclaimed balance and or in a local dialect, published in the
whether the same is in money or in locality where the bank, building and
security, and if the latter, the nature of the loan association or trust corporation is
same; situated, if there be any, and in case there
“(c) The date when the person in whose is none, in the City of Manila, at such time
favor the unclaimed balance stands died, as the court may order. Upon the trial, the
if known, or the date when he made his court must hear all parties who have
last deposit or withdrawal; and appeared therein, and if it be
“(d) The interest due on such unclaimed determined that such unclaimed
balance, if any, and the amount thereof. balances in any defendant bank,
building and loan association or trust
“A copy of the above sworn statement corporation are unclaimed as
shall be posted in a conspicuous place in hereinbefore stated, then the court
the premises of the bank, building and shall render judgment in favor of the
loan association, or trust corporation Government of the Republic of the
concerned for at least sixty days from the Philippines, declaring that said
TRANSCRIBED BY 3-MANRESA [2019-2020]
Mana-ay, Tan, B., Paulma, Estremos, Talon, Dela Cerna, Bajao, Manligoy, Alaban, Pizarro, Villavicencio, Banosan,
Aberilla, Reyes (Special Thanks to Lara De los Santos)
35
BANKING AND OTHER COMMERCIAL LAWS
A class transcription from the lectures of Atty. Raymund Christian S. Ong Abrantes, CPA
ATENEO DE DAVAO UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW
unclaimed balances have escheated to and render the appropriate judgment
the Government of the Republic of the thereon.
Philippines and commanding said bank,
building and loan association or trust
corporation to forthwith deposit the Take note of the procedure because you can
same with the Treasurer of the question the forfeiture proceedings if there is an
Philippines to credit of the Government irregularity in the procedure.
of the Republic of the Philippines to be
Let’s go to the cases.
used as the National Assembly may
direct. RCBC vs. Hi-Tri Dev.
Corp. , et. al,
“At the time of issuing summons in the G.R. No. 192413, June
action above provided for, the clerk of 13, 2012
court shall also issue a notice signed by
him, giving the title and number of said FACTS:
action, and referring to the complaint Consequently, the Spouses Bakunawa,
therein, and directed to all persons, other through their company, the Hi-Tri
than those named as defendants therein, Development Corporation (Hi-Tri) took
claiming any interest in any unclaimed out on October 28, 1991, a Managers
balance mentioned in said complaint, Check from RCBC-Ermita payable to
and requiring them to appear within sixty Millan’s company Rosmil Realty and
days after the publication or first Development Corporation (Rosmil) c/o
publication, if there are several, of such Teresita Millan and used this as one of
summons, and show cause, if they have their basis for a complaint which they
any, why the unclaimed balances filed with the Regional Trial Court of
involved in said action should not be Quezon City, Branch 99.
deposited with the Treasurer of the
Philippines as in this Act provided and On January 31, 2003, during the
notifying them that if they do not appear pendency of the above mentioned case
and show cause, the Government of the and without the knowledge of [Hi-Tri and
Republic of the Philippines will apply to Spouses Bakunawa], RCBC reported the
the court for the relief demanded in the ₱1,019,514.29-credit existing in favor of
complaint. A copy of said notice shall be Rosmil to the Bureau of Treasury as
attached to, and published with the copy among its unclaimed balances as of
of, said summons required to be January 31, 2003.
published as above, and at the end of the
copy of such notice so published, there Allegedly, a copy of the Sworn
shall be a statement of the date of Statement was posted within the
publication, or first publication, if there premises of RCBC-Ermita.
are several, of said summons and notice. On December 14, 2006, x x x Republic,
Any person interested may appear in said through the [Office of the Solicitor
action and become a party thereto. Upon General (OSG)], filed with the RTC the
the publication or the completion of the action below for Escheat.
publication, if there are several, of the
summons and notice, and the service of [Manuel Bakunawa, through Hi-Tri]
the summons on the defendant banks, inquired from RCBC-Ermita the
building and loan associations or trust availability of the RCBC Managers
corporations, the court shall have full and Check, [Hi-Tri and Spouses Bakunawa]
complete jurisdiction in the Republic of were however dismayed when they were
the Philippines over the said unclaimed informed that the amount was already
balances and over the persons having or subject of the escheat proceedings
claiming any interest in the said before the RTC, which declared the
unclaimed balances, or any of them, and deposits, credits, and unclaimed
shall have full and complete jurisdiction balances escheated to the Republic.
to hear and determine the issues herein,
A demand draft is not therefore of the Diba kapag may check ka, it has to be accepted.
same category as a cashier's check which That’s the time that the bank acknowledges that
should come within the purview of the BSP may utang ako sa’yo, babayaran ko to. Until
law. then, there is yet no debtor-creditor relationship
between the depositor and the bank.
TELEGRAPHIC TRANSFER: INCLUDED
AS TO TELEGRAPHIC TRANSFER: Included
The case, however, is different with
The agreement to remit creates a contractual
regard to telegraphic payment order. It is
said that as the transaction is for the obligation has been termed a purchase and sale
establishment of a telegraphic or cable transaction. The purchaser of a telegraphic transfer
transfer the agreement to remit creates a upon making payment completes the transaction
contractual obligation has been termed a insofar as he is concerned, though insofar as the
purchase and sale transaction. The remitting bank is concerned the contract is
purchaser of a telegraphic transfer upon executory until the credit is established.
making payment completes the
transaction insofar as he is concerned, Pag telegraphic transfer, tinanggap na ng banko
though insofar as the remitting bank is yun. Yes mag tratransfer ako ng ganitong amount.
concerned the contract is executory until There is already a debtor-creditor relationship.
the credit is established. We agree with
the following comment the Solicitor
There are high end shops in Casinos such as 10. TRANSACTION LAUNDERING
Hermes and others. Usually, they survive
even if there are no sales. Money laundering When a merchant unknowingly processes
in this scenario may come in where a foreign illicit credit card transactions for another
national wants to gamble but they find it business. This is like assignment credit. You
hard to bring in huge amounts of dirty assigned but you don’t have anything to be
money in the Philippines without being assigned.
questioned. Hence, they course it through
these shops. It would appear that they 11. USE OF FRONT OR PASS THROUGH
purchase goods such as bags in a pricey COMPANY AND FUNNEL ACCOUNTS
amount but the shops would give the
foreign nationals the money needed for Example is you pretend to be a legitimate
gambling instead of the physical goods. In company and as if you buy goods, that there
effect, the shops would record it as sales but is shipment, and documents to prove such
there is no outflow of inventory and only an but there are really no goods. It is just a
outflow of cash. mere exchange of money coursed through
the company.
5. TRADE BASED LAUNDERING
Example is in BIDDINGS where there are TOP CASES FOR MONEY LAUNDERING
secrecy of bidders.
CASE: Bank of Credit and Commerce
6. SHELL COMPANIES AND TRUST International
Where you pretend to have a company and Banks were investigated as there was
buy goods, that there is shipment and embezzlement. It was found out that the one
documentary evidences but there is really who is engaged in money laundering is the
none. Also, in special purpose vehicles Chairman of the bank and such embezzled
where it is separate from the parent money was in shell companies and trusts.
company and is seldomly checked upon by
the parent company. The dirty money can NOTE: The stricter the bank secrecy law in a
be hidden here. jurisdiction the better the chances for money
laundering because it would be very difficult to
7. ROUND TRIPPING trace the source because the bank deposits will
not be allowed to be checked or scrutinized.
You have money in the Philippines and you
funnel it in tax havens such as Bahamas or
Birtish Virgin Islands. If it’s there and already CASE: Ferdinand Marcos (a published case
laundered, it can come back now to the for money laundering)
Philippines as part of the banking system.
Unknown amount stipulated at $10 Billion
8. BANK CAPTURE were funneled through banks and financial
institutions in USA, Liechtenstein, Bahamas,
They try to become an owner or stockholder Cayman Islands, etc. So, there are so many
of a bank. This is the reason why the law bank accounts.
providing for qualifications of who may
become an officer or stockholder of a bank CASE: HSBC
is very strict. It is to avoid the possibility of
money laundering. If you noticed, HSBC before has this campaign
for issuance of credit cards. This happened
9. CASINOS outside of the PHIL. Where such credit cards
were used to launder money.
“2. the client is not properly identified; 3. the amount involved is not commensurate with
the business or financial capacity of the client;
“3. the amount involved is not commensurate
with the business or financial capacity of the 4. taking into account all known circumstances, it
client; may be perceived that the client’s transaction is
structured in order to avoid being the subject of
“4. taking into account all known circumstances, reporting requirements under the Act;
it may be perceived that the client’s
transaction is structured in order to avoid DISCUSSION: So let’s say alam mo naman na Php
being the subject of reporting requirements 500,000 yung covered transactions so pinagtagpi-
under the Act; tagpi mo siya. So in three days nag deposit ka ng
Php 200,000, Php 200,000 then 100,000. If it is
“5. any circumstance relating to the transaction structured as to avoid detection, it is a suspicious
which is observed to deviate from the profile transaction.
of the client and/or the client’s past
transactions with the covered institution; 5. any circumstance relating to the transaction
which is observed to deviate from the profile of
“6. the transaction is in any way related to an the client and/or the client’s past transactions
unlawful activity or offense under this Act that with the covered institution;
is about to be, is being or has been committed;
or DISCUSSION: So lagi kang may deposit na bente
bente tapos bigla ka lang nag deposit in 1 million.
“7. any transaction that is similar or analogous It deferred from your profile.
to any of the foregoing.”
6. the transaction is in any way related to an
(b-1) ‘Suspicious transaction’ are transactions with unlawful activity or offense under this Act that is
covered institutions, regardless of the amounts about to be, is being or has been committed; or
involved, where any of the following circumstances
exist: 7. any transaction that is similar or analogous to
any of the foregoing.”
We talked last weekend, father had this idea of Please take note of the ways in which money
creating an institute- Ateneo Legal Education laundering can be committed.
Extension Institute. They will do short term courses
for example bank personnel on how to perform
due diligence for bank transaction etc. Which court has jurisdiction over money
laundering cases?
Jurisdiction of Money Laundering Cases and
Money Laundering Investigation Procedures SEC. 5. Jurisdiction of Money Laundering
Cases. – The regional trial courts shall have
➢ The Regional Trial Court shall have the jurisdiction to try all cases on money laundering.
jurisdiction to try all cases of money
laundering Those committed by public officers and private
➢ Those committed by public officers and persons who are in conspiracy with such public
private persons who are in conspiracy with officers shall be under the jurisdiction of the
such public officers shall be under the Sandiganbayan.
jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan.
What if for example, for purposes of reference, the
branch manager of Jupiter branch of RCBC did not
MAR 4: DE LOS SANTOS commit the unlawful activity but dun lang siya sa
money laundering, so you can be convicted or
tried with either or both—the unlawful activity and
So we have discussed or started discussing the the money laundering.
Anti- money Laundering Regulations.
SEC. 6. Prosecution of Money Laundering. –
What constitutes a money laundering offense?
(a) Any person may be charged with and
It is committed by: convicted of both the offense of money
laundering and the unlawful activity as
SEC. 4. Money Laundering Offense. -- herein defined.
Rule 6.7. No element of the unlawful activity, "(6) to apply before the Court of Appeals, ex
however, including the identity of the parte, for the freezing of any monetary
perpetrators and the details of the actual instrument or property alleged to be the
commission of the unlawful activity need be proceeds of any unlawful activity as defined in
established by proof beyond reasonable doubt. Section 3(i) hereof;
The elements of the offense of money
laundering are separate and distinct from the "(7) to implement such measures as may be
elements of the felony or offense constituting the necessary and justified under this Act to
unlawful activity. counteract money laundering;
So by virtue of this law, there was a creation of the "(8) to receive and take action in respect of, any
council or the Anti- Money Laundering Council. request from foreign states for assistance in their
own anti-money laundering operations provided
How do they decide the composition of this? in this Act;
(2) to issue orders addressed to the appropriate (4) to cause the filing of complaints with the
Supervising Authority or the covered Department of Justice or the Ombudsman for the
institutions…xxx prosecution of money laundering offenses
(5) to investigate suspicious transactions and This is what we call the Enhanced Due Diligence:
covered transactions deemed suspicious after an
investigation by AMLC…xxx
i. Obtain senior management approval for Contrary to the enhanced due diligence, we also
establishing or continuing. (for existing have the reduced due diligence.
customers) such business relationships;
Rule 9.a.9.a.1. Reduced Due Diligence. -
ii. Take reasonable measures to establish the Whenever reduced due diligence is applied in
source of wealth and source of funds; and accordance with the covered institution’s
customer acceptance policy, the following rules
iii. Conduct enhanced ongoing monitoring of shall apply:
the business relationship
a.) For individual customers classified as low
Very important is the identification of the risk, a covered institution may open an
depositor. If you are considered as a high-risk account under the true and full name of
person or in a high risk transaction, i-eenhance pa the account owner or owners upon
yun yung identification of the depositor. presentation of an acceptable ID only.
What are the necessary procedures for enhanced b.) For corporate, partnership, and sole
due diligence? proprietorship entities, and other entities
such as banking institutions, trust entities
i. Obtain senior management approval for and quasi-banks authorized by the
establishing or continuing. (for existing Supervising Authorities to operate as
customers) such business relationships; such, publicly listed companies subject
to regulatory disclosure requirements,
ii. Take reasonable measures to establish the government agencies including GOCCs,
source of wealth and source of funds; a covered institution may open an
account under the official name of these
So, it is not sufficient to just ask the depositor entities with only item (e) of those
“where does this money come from?” There must required under Rule 9.a.5 (Board or
be reasonable measures to determine that indeed Partners’ Resolution duly certified by the
it came from legitimate source. A common Corporate/Partners’ Secretary
problem is for example, a deed of sale, tapos authorizing the signatory to sign on
meron kayong consideration. Chances are, yung behalf of the entity) obtained at the time
isa mababa ang value, yung isa mataas. Syempe of account opening.
yung pumapasok nap era dun sa mataas. Yung
ninonotarize yung mababa to lower the applicable
taxes. So ang ginagawa nila niyan is inaaproximate Rule 9.a.16. Politically Exposed Persons. – A
lang sa zonal value even if the consideration paid covered institution shall take reasonable
is Php10 million tapos sa zonal value is just Php5 measures to determine whether a customer or
million, dun lang yan sa mababa. It becomes a beneficial owner is a PEP as defined under Rule
problem kasi pagitngin mo sa cheke Php 10 million 3.b.2 hereof. In cases of higher risk business
pero sa deed of sale mo, Php5 milion. But this is relationship with such persons including foreign
acceptable to the bank because this practice is PEPs, a covered institution shall apply the
prevalent. They would just ask for the internal deed enhanced due diligence measures under Rule
of sale na hindi naman ninonotarize. 9.a.9.a.
Again, if you are high risk, enhanced due diligence. From 2018 TSN:
If low risk ka, reduced due diligence.
Pwede ba na ang transaction both covered and
suspicious? Pwede. Should a transaction be
Now, shell company or shell bank. determined to be both a covered and a suspicious
transaction, the covered institution shall report the
Rule 9.a.19. Shell Company/Shell Bank. – A same as a suspicious transaction. In other words,
covered institution shall undertake there is greater monitoring when it is suspicious.
business/banking relationship with a shell
company with extreme caution and always apply Example of both a covered and a suspicious
enhanced due diligence under Rule 9.a.9.a. transaction: Let’s say walang legitimate purpose
tapos the amount is Php501,000. So covered na
No shell bank shall be allowed to operate or be siya kasi more than 500. Suspicious na siya kasi
established in the Philippines. A covered walang legitimate source.
institution shall refuse to enter into, or continue,
correspondent banking relationship with them.
It shall likewise guard against establishing Rule 9.c.3. Exemption from Bank Secrecy
relations with foreign financial institutions that Laws. – When reporting covered or suspicious
permit their accounts to be used by shell banks. transactions to the AMLC, covered institutions
and their officers and employees, shall not be
deemed to have violated R.A. No. 1405, as
What is a shell company? amended, R.A. No. 6426, as amended, R.A. No.
8791 and other similar laws, but are prohibited
Bawal na to actually eh. Theres a SEC Regulation na from communicating, directly or indirectly, in any
dinidiscourage na to eh. A shell company in manner or by any means, to any person the fact
relation to Enron, is an affiliate company na hindi that a covered or suspicious transaction report
mo sinasali as part of the conglomerate. Kaya shell. was made, the contents thereof, or any other
May sarili siyang mundo. It is frequently used to information in relation thereto.
hide assets. For example, conglomerate tapos
gusto nila magtayo ng shell company. Mga VIP In case of violation thereof, the concerned officer
assets ihiwalay so that in the event of bankruptcy and employee of the covered institution shall be
may mga nakahiwalay. criminally liable.
Rule 9.c.4. Confidentiality Provisions. – When (1) Upon verified ex parte petition by the
reporting covered transactions or suspicious AMLC and after determination that
transactions to the AMLC, covered institutions probable cause exists that any monetary
and their officers and employees are prohibited instrument or property is in any way
from communicating, directly or indirectly, in any related to any unlawful activity as
manner or by any means, to any person, entity, defined in Rule 3.h hereof or to a money
the media, the fact that a covered or suspicious laundering offense, the Court of Appeals
transaction report was made, the contents may issue a freeze order on said
thereof, or any other information in relation monetary instrument or property which
thereto. shall be effective immediately.
So being a person under a covered institution, you (4) The Court shall act on the petition to freeze
are prone to suit, so… within twenty-four (24) hours from filing of the
petition. If the petition is filed a day before a non-
working day, the computation of the twenty-four
Rule 9.c.5. Safe Harbor Provisions. – No (24) hour period shall exclude the nonworking
administrative, criminal or civil proceedings shall days.
lie against any person for having made a covered
transaction report or a suspicious transaction
report in the regular performance of his duties Please take note, the Court shall act on the petition
and in good faith, whether or not such reporting within 24 hours, so mabilis ito. Bakit?
results in any criminal prosecution under this Act
or any other Philippine law. Cause there is danger that it might be transferred
to another account specially now that there is
online banking. SO pag malaman na nila na may
So how does the AMLA work? nag petition for freeze order, bank transfer or wire
transfer agad. That’s why they shall act within 24
Pag meron nareport na suspicious, they would do hours.
it discreetly. Magtatawag lang yan. Tapos minsan
pamgpapadala ng tao yan to look at the business (5) A person whose account has been frozen may
na sinasabi mong source and magtatanong sa file a motion to lift the freeze order and the court
neighbors. They are like the investigating must resolve this motion before the expiration of
department of the Ombudsman. the twenty (20) - day original freeze order.
The next provision is very very important for So the remedy is you can file a motion to lift the
purposes of your bar. freeze order, or a TRO or a writ of injunction before
the Supreme Court.
RULE 10
Authority to File Petitions for Freeze Order Ito very important and laging tinatanong:
Rule 10.b. Definition of Probable Cause. – This is also a favorite bar exam question.
Probable cause includes such facts and
circumstances which would lead a reasonably So, pwede nilang i-inquire by order from the Court
discreet, prudent or cautious man to believe of Appeals and upon establishment that there is
than an unlawful activity and/or a money probable cause that the deposits or investments
laundering offense is about to be, is being or has involved, including related accounts, are related to
been committed and that the account or any an unlawful activity as defined in Rule 3.h hereof or
monetary instrument or property sought to be a money laundering offense under Rule 4.
frozen is in any way related to said unlawful
activity and/or money laundering offense. Now when is a court order not required?
Rule 12.a. Authority to Institute Civil Rule 13.d. Limitations on Requests for Mutual
Forfeiture Proceedings. – The AMLC is Assistance. – The AMLC may refuse to comply
authorized under Section 7(3) of the AMLA, as with any request for assistance where the action
amended, to institute civil forfeiture sought by the request contravenes any provision
proceedings and all other remedial proceedings of the Constitution or the execution of a request
through the Office of the Solicitor General. is likely to prejudice the national interest of the
Philippines, unless there is a treaty between the
Philippines and the requesting State relating to
Now we also have this provision because of the provision of assistance in relation to money
globalization… laundering offenses.
RULE 13
Mutual Assistance among States
RULE 15
Rule 13.a. Request for Assistance from a Prohibitions Against Political Harassment
Foreign State. – Where a foreign State makes a
request for assistance in the investigation or Rule 15.a. Prohibition against Political
prosecution of a money laundering offense, the Persecution. – The AMLA, as amended, and
AMLC may execute the request or refuse to these Rules shall not be used for political
execute the same and inform the foreign State of persecution or harassment or as an instrument to
any valid reason for not executing the request or hamper competition in trade and commerce. No
for delaying the execution thereof. The case for money laundering may be filed to the
principles of mutuality and reciprocity shall, for prejudice of a candidate for an electoral office
this purpose, be at all times recognized. during an election period.
Rule 13.b. Powers of the AMLC to Act on a Pwede naman kasi talaga siyang gamitin diba? You
Request for Assistance from a Foreign State. – know for a fact na kalaban ko sa negsyo yun
The AMLC may execute a request for assistance madami siguro pera yun so kunwari magfa-file ka,
from a foreign State by: gagawa ka muna ng kwento na from unlawful
funds.
(1) tracking down, freezing, restraining and
seizing assets alleged to be proceeds of any We have several cases…
unlawful activity under the procedures laid down
in the AMLA, as amended, and in these Rules; SUBIDO PAGENTE CERTEZA
AMLC's inquiry into bank deposits does not (1) ex-parte application by the AMLC;
violate due process nor the right to privacy:
(2) determination of probable cause by the CA;
1. Section 11's allowance for AMLC's ex-parte and
application for an inquiry into particular bank
deposits and investments is investigative, not (3) exception of court order in cases involving
adjudicatory; unlawful activities defined in Sections 3(i)(1), (2),
and (12)
2. The text of Section 11 itself provides
safeguards and limitations on the allowance to
the AMLC to inquire into bank deposits: (a) Section 11 does not violate SUBSTANTIVE due
issued by the CA based on probable cause; and process
(b) specific compliance to the requirements of
Sections 2 and 3, Article III of the Constitution; The Court held that Section 11 of the AMLA
providing for ex-parte application and inquiry by
3. The ex-parte procedure for investigating bank the AMLC into certain bank deposits and
accounts is necessary to achieve a legitimate investments does not violate substantive due
state objective; process, there being no physical seizure of
property involved at that stage.
4. There is no legitimate expectation of privacy
as to the bank records of a depositor; It is the preliminary and actual seizure of the
bank deposits or investments in question which
5. The examination of, and inquiry, into SPCMB's brings these within reach of the judicial process,
bank accounts does not violate Attorney-Client specifically a determination that the seizure
Privilege; and violated due process.
6. A criminal complaint is not a pre-requisite to a The Court cited the same Eugenio case:
bank inquiry order.
A bank inquiry order under Section 11 does not
necessitate any form of physical seizure of
ISSUE: WON Sec 11 of RA 9160 is property of the account holder. What the bank
unconstitutional for being violative of the right to inquiry order authorizes is the examination of the
due process – particular deposits or investments in banking
institutions or non-bank financial institutions. The
monetary instruments or property deposited with
RULING: NO such banks or financial institutions are not seized
in a physical sense, but are examined on
PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS – SEC 11 does Textually, the AMLA is the first line of defense
NOT violate procedural due process against money laundering in compliance with
our international obligation. There are three (3)
Procedural due process is essentially the stages of determination, two (2) levels of
opportunity to be heard. In this case, at the investigation, falling under three (3) jurisdictions:
investigation stage by the AMLC into possible
money laundering offenses, SPCMB demands (1) The AMLC investigates possible money
that it have notice and hearing of AMLC's laundering offences and initially determines
investigation into its bank accounts. whether there is probable cause to charge any
person with a money laundering offence under
SPCMB Argues: Investigation is akin to Section 4 of the AMLA, resulting in the filing of a
extradition proceedings complaint with the Department of Justice or the
Office of the Ombudsman;
SPCMB points out that the AMLC 's bank inquiry
is preliminary to the seizure and deprivation of (2) The DOJ or the Ombudsman conducts the
its property as in a freeze order under Section 10 preliminary investigation proceeding and if after
of the AMLA which peculiarity lends itself to a sui due notice and hearing finds probable cause for
generis proceeding akin to the evaluation money laundering offences, shall file the
process in extradition proceedings Citing: necessary information before the Regional Trial
Secretary of Justice v. Hon. Lantion Courts or the Sandiganbayan;
In this instance, the grant of jurisdiction over Nowhere from the text of the law nor its
cases involving money laundering offences is Implementing Rules and Regulations can we
bestowed on the Regional Trial Courts and the glean that the AMLC exercises quasi-judicial
Sandiganbayan as the case may be. functions whether the actual preliminary
investigation is done simply at its behest or
In fact, Rule 5 of the IRR is entitled Jurisdiction of conducted by the Department of Justice and the
Money Laundering Cases and Money Ombudsman.
Laundering Investigation Procedures:
THEREFORE; The AMLC functions solely as an
Rule 5.a. Jurisdiction of Money Laundering investigative body in the instances mentioned in
Cases. The Regional Trial Courts shall have the Rule 5.b. Thereafter, the next step is for the
jurisdiction to try all cases on money laundering. AMLC to file a Complaint with either the DOJ or
Those committed by public officers and private the Ombudsman pursuant to Rule 6.b.
Now, dahil 60itto, marami masyadong tao ang So when you talk about personal information, you
naniniwala sa fake news. Actually kung meron ka are not just referring to your name, it can also be
ng isang, diba the theory of inception. Meron ka ng any information that can be reasonably and directly
idea of what has happened tapos ise-search mo ascertained by the entity holding the information
siya, chances are lahat ng mababasa at mababasa or when put together with other information would
mo for the nxt few days are related to that. This will directly and certainly identify an individual.
figure the belief that that idea is true when in fact
hindi naman. Binebenta yung data mo sa mga Pinaka obvious, full name. Hindi lang limited dun.
marketing departments ng companies. This is the So any information na kapag tinahi-tahi mo
problem in social media. malalaman mo na ikaw to.
Because of this problem, the arising threat to data In contrast to that, we have the Sensitive Personal
privacy, they were compelled to enact a Data Information. If you try to read the different Data
Privacy Law. Privacy Laws of different jurisdictions laging may
dalawa yan. You have:
What is peculiar here is that it has (a) The act, practice or processing relates to
EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION. Most laws, are personal information about a Philippine citizen or
territorial in nature but Data Privacy Law is a resident;
extraterritorial because data is processed not only
locally but globally. Thus it must be comprehensive Let’s say sa India yung call center and I am Unilever
enough to secure those outside the country. in the Philippines, but my customer services is
processed by a call center in India, so kung may
SEC. 5. Protection Afforded to Journalists and customers ako from the Philippines calling for
Their Sources. – Nothing in this Act shall be some defects in my products, it will refer you to the
construed as to have amended or repealed the call center in India. In that case, the call center in
provisions of Republic Act No. 53, which affords India is also included kasi it processes information
the publishers, editors or duly accredited for customers in the Philippines.
reporters of any newspaper, magazine or
periodical of general circulation protection from Some countries have what they call the “White List
being compelled to reveal the source of any Provision”. Like Malaysia. It has a white list
news report or information appearing in said provision wherein any information of their
publication which was related in any confidence residents can only be processed by jurisdictions
to such publisher, editor, or reporter. within the white list. Usually nasa white list ka if
meron kang effective na Data Privacy Law.
SEC. 6. Extraterritorial Application. – This Act What if your country is not among the white list?
applies to an act done or practice engaged in
and outside of the Philippines by an entity if: Ipasok mo muna sa white list. Anyway, those are
the tricks of the trade.
SEC. 17. Transmissibility of Rights of the Data 2. Several public officials were charged
Subject. – The lawful heirs and assigns of the data before the Sandiganbayan for violation of
subject may invoke the rights of the data subject the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act
for, which he or she is an heir or assignee at any involving the anomalous award of a multi-
time after the death of the data subject or when billion contract to Corporation Z.
the data subject is incapacitated or incapable of
exercising the rights as enumerated in the The Information alleged that each of the
immediately preceding section. accused received kickbacks from
Corporation Z in exchange for the
dispensation of certain bidding
SEC. 18. Right to Data Portability. – The data requirements, and that the said kickbacks
subject shall have the right, where personal were deposited to the accused's respective
information is processed by electronic means bank accounts in the Philippines. Upon
and in a structured and commonly used format, request of the Office of the Ombudsman,
to obtain from the personal information the Compliance and Investigation Staff of
controller a copy of data undergoing processing the Anti-Money Laundering Council
in an electronic or structured format, which is (AMLC) conducted an intelligence
commonly used and allows for further use by the database search.
data subject. The Commission may specify the The search revealed that there were
electronic format referred to above, as well as remittances to the bank accounts of the
the technical standards, modalities and accused with six (6) different banks.
procedures for their transfer.
(a) May the AMLC examine the bank
accounts of the accused-public officials
(skipped some provisions) even without seeking a prior court
order? Explain.(2.5%)
SEC. 34. Extent of Liability. – If the offender is a
corporation, partnership or any juridical person, (b) May a court order be issued ex
the penalty shall be imposed upon the parte for the freezing of the bank
responsible officers, as the case may be, who accounts of the accused-public officials
participated in, or by their gross negligence, upon application of the AMLC? If so, in
allowed the commission of the crime. If the what instance may this be done and
offender is a juridical person, the court may which court can issue such order?
suspend or revoke any of its rights under this Act. Explain. (2.5%)
If the offender is an alien, he or she shall, in
addition to the penalties herein prescribed, be
deported without further proceedings after 2018
serving the penalties prescribed.
If the offender is a public official or employee Through various acts of graft and bribery, Mayor
and lie or she is found guilty of acts penalized Ycasiano accumulated a large amount of wealth
under Sections 27 and 28 of this Act, he or she which he converted into U.S. dollars and deposited
shall, in addition to the penalties prescribed in a Foreign Currency Deposit Unit (FCDU) account
herein, suffer perpetual or temporary absolute with the Yuen Bank (YB). On a tip given by the
disqualification from office, as the case may be. secretary of the mayor, the Anti-Money Laundering
Council (AMLC) sent an order to YB to confirm the
Given that her appropriation of the Section 2. Declaration of Policy. - It is the policy of
necklace was theft, may Flora be the State to regulate the establishment of pre-need
successfully prosecuted for money companies and to place their operation on sound,
laundering? efficient and stable basis to derive the optimum
advantage from them in the mobilization of savings
and to prevent and mitigate, as far as practicable,
practices prejudicial to public interest and the
2. Prosperous Bank is a domestic bank with
protection of planholders.
head office in Makati. It handles the banking
The State shall hereby regulate, through an
requirements of thousands of clients.
empowered agency, pre-need companies based
on prudential principles to promote soundness,
The AMLC initiated a discreet investigation
stability and sustainable growth of the pre-need
of the financial transactions of Lorenzo, a
industry.
suspected drug trafficker based in Naga
City. The intelligence group of the AMLC, in When we talk about prudential principles, it means
coordination with the counterpart group that preneed companies should be conservative in
from the PDEA and the NBI, gathered managing their resources. Hindi sila dapat puro
ample evidence establishing Lorenzo’s speculations. We will discuss later on the concept
unlawful drug activities. The AMLC had of trust fund when it comes to preneed which is
Discussion for (b) Pre-need plans: If you misstated your age, your eligibility,
you are NOT entitled to any benefits.
As distinguished from insurance: However, please take note, all your
payments shall be refunded accordingly
INSURANCE PRENEED PLAN without interest, provided, that you or your
beneficiary surrender your Plan Contract
One cannot determine One can actually have
and all supporting documents associated
the time wherein one the maturity date. Alam
with the same. The preneed plan should not
will pay the insurance. mo kelan mag-aaral
contain any provision that your payments
yung nasa educational
Example: Death plan. It has a future are considered non-refundable,
although death is determinative period. confiscated. It must be returned of course
certain, the time of without any interest because you misstated
death is not certain. your eligibility.
IX. INCONTESTABILITY
INSURANCE COMMISSION CIRCULAR LETTER The contestability period for any of the
NO. 2016-11 above insurance benefits shall be one (1)
7. Maximum Benefit (Total Education (d) "Planholder" refers to any natural or juridical
Benefit for education plans, Maturity person who purchases pre-need plans from a pre-
Benefit for pension plans and Plan Value for need company for whom or for whose
memorial plans) - The Maximum Benefit beneficiaries' benefits are to be delivered, as
shall not exceed 1000 times the daily stipulated and guaranteed by the pre-need
minimum wage rate for non-agricultural company. The term includes the assignee,
workers in Metro Manila. transferee and any successor - in - interest of the
planholder.
8. Terms and Conditions - A micro pre-
need contract shall clearly state the benefit Discussion:
amount (Total Education Benefit, Maturity Similar to a policy holder.
Benefit or Plan Value whichever is
applicable) and terms of coverage. A planholder could be a natural or juridical person.
Contract provisions shall be clearly stated in Please take note. Hindi lang limited sa natural
simple and easy to understand language. person. A juridical person could also be
considered as a planholder as long as that juridical
9. Effectivity - A micro pre-need contract person purchases a pre-need plan from a pre-need
becomes effective immediately upon full company for whom or for whose beneficiaries'
payment of the first installment including benefits are to be delivered.
fees or charges.
Section 9. Paid-up Capital. - A pre-need company In determining whether an individual is fit and
incorporated after the effectivity of this Code shall proper to hold the position of a director or officer
have a minimum paid - up capital of One hundred of a pre-need company, regard shall be given to
million pesos (P100, 000,000.00). Existing pre- his integrity, experience, education, training and
need companies shall comply with the following competence. The following persons, and those
minimum unimpaired paid - up capital: determined by the Commission to be unfit, shall in
no case be allowed to serve or act in the capacity
(a) One Hundred million pesos (P100, 000,000.00) of an officer, employee, director, consultant or
for companies selling at least three (3) types of sales counselor of any pre-need company:
plan;
“Any violation of this section shall be considered “One hundred percent (100%) of the capital stock”
sufficient cause for the suspension or revocation of The pre-need companies may declare dividends,
the company's certificate of authority” because they are stock corporations, with the
This again shows that it is not easy to organize a condition (as to all corporation) that there is
pre-need company. Aside from the heavy sufficient capital that will not impair 100% of the
regulations, there is a strict qualification as to the capital stock (subscribed capital). So the company
director. cannot declare if a,b and c are not covered by the
retained earnings and others.
Section 26. Payment of Plan Proceeds. - In the
case of scheduled benefit plans, the proceeds TRUST FUND
Facts: SEC issued the corresponding New Rules Legacy is not a beneficiary. It must be stressed
on the Registration and Sale of Pre-Need that a person is considered as a beneficiary of a
Plans (New Rules) to govern the pre-need trust if there is a manifest intention to give such a
industry prior to the enactment of R.A. No. 9829, person the beneficial interest over the trust
otherwise known as the Pre-Need Code of the properties. Here, the terms of the trust
Philippines (Pre-Need Code). It required from agreement plainly confer the status of
the pre-need providers the creation of trust beneficiary to the planholders, not to Legacy.
funds as a requirement for registration. The beneficial ownership is vested in the
planholders and the legal ownership in the
As defined in Rule 1.9 of the New Rules, "'Trust trustee, LBP; Legacy, as trustor, is left without any
Fund' means a fund set up from planholders' iota of interest in the trust fund.
payments, separate and distinct from the paid-
up capital of a registered pre-need company, To rule that Legacy has retained a beneficial
established with a trustee under a trust interest in the trust fund is to perpetuate the
agreement approved by the SEC, to pay for the injustices being committed against the
benefits as provided in the pre-need plan." planholders and violate not only the spirit of the
trust agreement but, more importantly, the
Legacy (pre-need company) entered into a trust lawmaker's intent. If indeed Legacy had an
agreement with the Land Bank of the interest that could be reached by its creditors
Philippines (LBP). Subsequently, Legacy became even during insolvency, the planholders would
a subject of a petition for involuntary insolvency be prejudiced as they would be forced to share
by private respondents in their capacity as in the assets that would be distributed pro rata
planholders. to all creditors, whether planholders or not.
It was declared insolvent by the RTC and it also Legacy merely agreed to facilitate the payment
ordered Legacy to submit an inventory of its of the benefits from the trust fund to the
assets and liabilities. SEC opposed the inclusion intended beneficiaries, acting as a conduit or an
of the trust fund in the inventory of corporate agent of the trustee in the enforcement of the
assets on the ground that to do so would trust agreement.
contravene the New Rules which treated trust
funds as principally established for the exclusive Issue 2: Is Legacy a debtor of the planholders
purpose of guaranteeing the delivery of benefits relative to the trust fund? – NO.
due to the planholders.
Ruling: The Court cannot subscribe either to the
Despite the opposition of the SEC, Judge Laigo Assignee's position that Legacy is a debtor of the
ordered the insolvency Assignee to take planholders relative to the trust fund. In trust, it is
possession of the trust fund. RTC stated that the the trustee, and not the trustor, who owes
trust fund could be withdrawn by the Assignee fiduciary duty to the beneficiary. The trustee,
to be used for the expenses he would incur in the LBP, is tasked with the fiduciary duty to act for the
discharge of his functions and to be distributed benefit of the planholders as to matters within
among the creditors who had officially filed their the scope of the relation.
valid claims with the court.
The trust fund should not revert to Legacy, which
Issue 1: Whether or not the trust fund of Legacy has no beneficial interest over it. Not being an
form part of its corporate assets. – NO. asset of Legacy, the trust fund is immune from its
reach and cannot be included by the RTC in the
Ruling: The Trust Fund is for the sole benefit of insolvency estate.
the planholders and it cannot be used to satisfy
the claims of other creditors of Legacy.
Sir’s Question: Would it be necessary for a
The Assignee argues that Legacy has retained a planholder to file a notice of claim in the
beneficial interest in the trust fund despite the proceeding where the rehabilitation or
execution of the trust agreement and that the insolvency is taking place?
properties can be the subject of insolvency
proceedings. Diba sa FRIA we have discussed na kapag may
insolvency proceedings, lahat ng creditors magfi-
TRANSCRIBED BY 3-MANRESA [2019-2020]
Mana-ay, Tan, B., Paulma, Estremos, Talon, Dela Cerna, Bajao, Manligoy, Alaban, Pizarro, Villavicencio, Banosan,
Aberilla, Reyes (Special Thanks to Lara De los Santos)
81
BANKING AND OTHER COMMERCIAL LAWS
A class transcription from the lectures of Atty. Raymund Christian S. Ong Abrantes, CPA
ATENEO DE DAVAO UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW
file ng notice of claim dun sa proceedings to of suits. Kaya ang recourse nila (planholders or
participate in the insolvency proceedings. creditors) ay to file a notice of claim with the court
where the proceeding of insolvency or
rehabilitation is taking place.
Sabi natin, si planholder, necessary ba kay
planholder na mag file ng notice of claim given na
hindi naman kasali dun sa assets na ili-liquidate SEC v CAP
yung trust fund? GR No. 202052, March 7, 2018
Student: The planholder as creditors of the pre- Facts: College Assurance Plan Philippines, Inc.
need company may file a claim against the pre- (CAP) sells preneed education plans. To
need company in the insolvency proceeding. guarantee the payment of benefits under its
educational plans, CAP set up a Trust Fund
Sir: How would you reconcile that with the ruling in
contributing therein a certain percentage of the
this case which says that the trust fund is not part of amount actually collected from each planholder.
the assets which should be given to the creditors? The Trust Fund, with the aid of trustee banks, is
Student: They will raise the claim against the trust invested in assets and securities with yields
higher than the projected increase in tuition
itself for the release of their claims against the trust
fees.
fund given that the trust fund is solely for their
benefit. CAP incurred a trust fund deficiency of 3.179
Sir: So the answer is yes, magfi-file ka pa rin kasi billion. In compliance with the directive of SEC to
what's going to be resolved by the insolvency submit a funding scheme to correct the
deficiency, CAP, among others, proposed to
proceedings ay hindi lang naman yung
purchase MRT III Bonds and assign the same to
distribution. Pati yung issue, yung genuine issue
the Trust Fund.
on whether or not may utang ba talaga sayo,
that is also resolved. Once ma-determine na CAP purchased MRT III bonds from SMART and
meron talaga [utang], yung sa planholders will be FEMI but was ordered by the SEC Oversight
from a different asset which is the trust fund. Board to stop paying SMART/FEMI due to its
perceived inadequacy of CAP's funds.
Sino CAP planholder dito? Did you remember that
time wherein there was information saying na kung Subsequently, CAP filed a Petition for
meron kayong claim, you file within a particular Rehabilitation. In the interim, CAP sold the MRT
period? If hindi, they will no longer consider that III bonds and the buyers’ payment was credited
you have a claim. There was that time na nag issue to CAP’s trust accounts with Philippine Veterans
sila ng circular. It was posted in the CAP office that Bank (PVB). However, CAP’s payment to SMART
you have to file a claim. Kung meron kayong claim, and FEMI remained to be executed. Because of
then just attach your plan policy. That is for the this, the receiver moved for the payment of the
purpose of determining the validity of your respondent's obligations to Smart and FEMI.
claims. Kung meron ka naman talagang claim, it
will not come from the general assets but from Issue: Does the obligation to pay to SMART and
FEMI constitute
the trust fund.
• “benefits” or
So please take note, hindi pwedeng (--choppy or • “cost of services rendered or property
nawala talaga si Sir dito--) if there is a pending delivered” or
insolvency or rehabilitation proceeding kasi it • “administrative expense”
would result to multiplicity of suits, which is really that could be validly withdrawn from the trust
prohibited or what the court is trying to prevent. fund? – NO.