Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
☞ took effect on August 30, 1950 2. When the law makes the act only
voidable and not void (ex.
Effectivity of laws voidable contracts where consent
Laws take effect 15 is vitiated)
days following the 3. When the law makes the act valid
completion of its publication but punishes the violator (ex.
Unless otherwise provided marriage solemnized by a person
by the law. This refers to without legal authority)
the 15 day period and NOT to the
requirement of publication. (Tanada vs. Waiver of rights
Tuvera) ☞ Requisites: (EKI)
1. Existence of a right
NOTE: Administrative rules and 2. Knowledge of the existence of a right
regulations must also be published if their 3. Intention to relinquish the right
purpose is to enforce or implement
existing laws pursuant to a valid Rights can be
delegation. The publication must be in
waived.
full since its purpose is to inform the
1. If the waiver is contrary to law,
public of the contents of the law. (Phil. Int’l
public order, public policy, morals
Trading Corp. vs. Angeles)
or good customs (LPPMG)
Ignorance of the law excuses no one ☞ 2. If the waiver is prejudicial to a third
party with a right recognized by
considered a CONCLUSIVE presumption
law.
and applies only to mandatory and
prohibitory laws. (Consunji vs. CA)
NOTE: A stipulation requiring the recipient
of a scholarship grant to waive his right to
Non-retroactivity of laws
transfer to another school, unless he
Laws have no
refunds the equivalent of his scholarship
retroactive effect.
in cash is null and void. The school
(UCIPELT) concerned obviously understands
1.Unless the law otherwise provides scholarship awards as a business scheme
2. Curative statutes designed to increase the business
3. Interpretative statutes potential of an educational institution.
4. Procedural/remedial Thus, conceived, it is not only inconsistent
5. Emergency laws with sound policy, but also with good
6. Laws creating new rights morals. (Cui vs. Arellano University)
7. Tax laws
Laws applicable
1. Ex
1. Penal laws and laws of public security
post facto laws 2. Laws that impair
obligation of contracts ☞ territoriality rule governs
☞ laws of the Philippines will govern
upon ALL those who live or
Acts Contrary To Law
sojourn in it
Acts which are contrary 2. Laws relating to family rights and
to mandatory or prohibitory laws are void. duties, or to the status, condition and
1. When the law itself authorized its legal capacity of persons
validity (ex. lotto, sweepstakes)
/
Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
2 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
spouse capacitating well as personal 3. Amount of
him or her to remarry, property is subject to successiona l rights
the Filipino spouse Covers 4. Order of succession
☞ nationality rule shall likewise have family Covers only the forms &
applies the capacity to rights & duties, status, solemnities (extrinsic
condition & legal validity)
☞ laws of the remarry under
capacity Exception :
Philippines will govern Philippine law. (Article
Art. 26, par. 2 of Family
its citizens, 26(2) Family Code)
Code
regardless of their Covers both real & Exceptions: 1. Art. 26,
residence NOTE: domiciliary personal par. 1 of
When a marriage rule supplants the property Family Code (marriage
between nationality rule in involving
a Filipino citizen and a cases involving Filipinos
foreigner is validly stateless persons solemnized abroad,
when such are void in
celebrated and a
Exceptions: (CIAO) the
divorce is thereafter 3. Laws on property
1. Capacity to succeed Philippines) 2. Intrinsic
validly obtained ☞ lex rei sitae applies validity of
2. Intrinsic validity of
abroad by the alien ☞ real property, as the will contracts
Renvoi Doctrine
the law of the country where it is ☞ Where the conflict rules of the
situated forum refer to a foreign law, and
the latter refers it back to the
4. Laws on forms and solemnities ☞ internal law, the latter (law of the
lex loci celebrationis applies forum) shall apply.
NOTE: If the foreign law refers it to a
Rules on Personal Law
DOMICILIARY RULE
his citizenship Presumption ☞ The foreign
third country, the said law, whenever applicable,
Basis for determining
country’s laws shall govern, should be proved by the
personal law of an individual is
his domicile and is referred to as the proponent thereof; otherwise,
NATIONALITY RULE transmission theory. such law shall be
basis for determining
personal law of an individual is Doctrine of Processual
LEX LEX REI SITAE TIONIS exactly the same as
NATIO NALII LEX LOCI CELEBRApresumed to be the law of the forum.
Rule on Prohibitive Laws Prohibitive laws
Art. 15, CC
Art. 16, CC Art. 17, CC
Citizenshi p is the basis applicable and laws which have conventions agreed
for determini ng the Law of the place where for their object public upon in foreign
personal law the contract was order, public policy or country.
applicable executed is the basis good customs are not
Law of the place for
rendered Art. 26, par. 2 Family
where the property is determining law
situated is applicable
ineffective by laws, Code
the basis for concerning persons, judgments ☞ Example: Divorce
determinin g law their acts or property promulgated or law
2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND SUBJECT CHAIRPERSONS Maricel
Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC-
Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VC-EDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark
David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
/
of the wife to perform her Cannot be causes Cannot exist without
wifely limited or juridical capacity Can be
Lost only through death restricted restricted, modified or limited
Lost through death and other
Can exist without capacity to act
2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND SUBJECT CHAIRPERSONS Maricel
Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC-
Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VC-EDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark
David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
/
their customs, rites and practices
2. solemnized outside the Phil. where
NO marriage license is required by
the solemnizing officer, with their the country where they were
personal declaration that the take solemnized
each other as husband and wife in 3. of a man and a woman who have lived
the presence of not less than two together as husband and wife for at
witnesses of legal age least 5 years and without legal
impediment to marry each other
Effects: NOTE: The 5-year period should be
1. Absence of essential or formal computed on the basis of a
requisites cohabitation as husband and wife
☞ the marriage is void ab initio 2. where the only missing factor is the
Defect in any of the essential requisites marriage contract to validate the
☞ The is marriage voidable union. This 5-year period should be
3. Irregularity in any of the formal the years immediately before the day
requisites of the marriage and it should be a
☞ Does NOT affect the validity of the period of cohabitation characterized
marriage BUT will hold the party by exclusivity - meaning no third party
responsible for such irregularity was involved at any time within the 5
liable years and continuity - that is
unbroken (Ninal vs. Bayadog, GR No.
Persons Authorized To Solemnize 133778 March 14, 2000).
Marriages: (PMJCCC)
1. priests, rabbis, and ministers of any NOTE: In the case of Manzano vs.
church Sanchez (G.R. No. MTJ-00-1329,
2. municipal and city mayors March 08, 2001), the Supreme Court
3. members of the judiciary laid down the requisites to avail the
4. ship captains or air plane chiefs 5. exemption under Article 34 of the
commanders of military unit, in the Family Code:
absence of chaplain a. The man and woman must have
6. consul generals, consuls or vice been living together as husband
consuls and wife for at least five years
before the marriage;
Authorized Venues Of Marriage b. The parties must have no legal
Must be solemnized impediment to marry each other;
publicly, and not elsewhere, in the: 1. c. The fact of absence of legal
chambers of the judge or in open court impediment between the parties
2. church, chapel or temple must be present at the time of
3. office of consul-general, consul or marriage;
vice-consul d. The parties must execute an
affidavit stating that they have
1. marriage at the point of lived together for at least five
death (articulo mortis); years [and are without legal
2. marriage in remote places impediment to marry each other;
3. marriage at a house or place and
designated by the parties with the e. The solemnizing officer must
written request to the solemnizing execute a sworn statement that
officer he had ascertained the
qualifications of the parties and
Marriages Exempt From License that he had found no legal
Requirement: (MOLAR) impediment to their marriage
1. among Muslims or members of ethnic 4. in articulo mortis
cultural communities, provided such 5. in remote places
were solemnized in accordance with
2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND SUBJECT CHAIRPERSONS Maricel
Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC-
Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VC-EDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark
David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
/
cohabitation
Psychological Incapacity
☞ no exact definition but is restricted to
intention to marry the other, killed the psychological incapacity “to comply
latter’s spouse, or his/her spouse. with the essential marital obligations
of marriage”
NOTE: Under the FC, the following can ☞ involves a senseless, protracted and
now marry each other: constant refusal to comply with the
a. Brother-in-law and sister-in-law; b. essential marital obligations by one or
Stepbrother and stepsister; both of the spouses although he, she
c. Guardian and ward; or they are physically capable of
d. Adopted and illegitimate child of the performing such obligations (Chi Ming
adopter; Tsoi vs. CA)
e. Parties who have been convicted of
adultery or concubinage. ☞ Essential elements:
(MAVFFCCI) a. Mental condition
D. Subsequent marriages b. Applies to a person who is maritally
1. without judicial declaration of nullity of contracted to another
previous void marriage (Article 40) c. Marriage entered into with volition
2. without judicial declaration of d. Failure to perform or comply with
presumptive death of absent spouse the essential obligations in
(Article 41) marriage
3. where the spouse was presumed dead, e. Failure to perform is chronic f.
and both the present spouse and Cause is psychological in nature g.
would-be spouse were in bad faith in Cause is serious, with juridical
contracting marriage (Article 44) antecedence and must be
incurable
NOTE: Where there was failure to record h. Incapacity results in the failure of
in the civil registry and registry of property the marriage.
the judgment of annulment or of absolute
nullity of the marriage, partition and
distribution of the property of the spouses (Republic vs. Molina)
and the delivery of the children’s 1. burden of proof belongs to the plaintiff
presumptive legitimes it shall not affect 2. root cause of the psychological
third persons (Articles 52-53). incapacity must be:
a. medically or clinically identified b.
NOTE: Even if a marriage is void, it must alleged in the complaint
be declared void first because the parties c. sufficiently proven by experts d.
cannot decide for themselves the explained in the decision
invalidity of their marriage. 3. incapacity must be existing at the time
of the celebration of marriage 4. incapacity
must be permanent or incurable
VOID VOIDABLE 5. illness is grave enough to bring about
Decree of nullity Decree of annulment disability to assume marital
Never be ratified Ratified by free obligations
Attacked directly or collaterally 6. marital obligations refer to Art. 220,221 and
Attacked directly only Art. 68- 71 of FC as well as
Co-ownership Conjugal 225 of the FC
Partnershi 7. interpretations of the National Appellate
p Matrimonial Tribunal of
Always void Valid until annulled
Action for Action prescribes controlling should be given
declaration of nullity does not the Catholic Church of the great respect.
prescribe Philippines while not 8. trial court must order the
2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND SUBJECT CHAIRPERSONS Maricel
Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC-
Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VC-EDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark
David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
/
conditions concur, the subsequent
JUDICIAL OF DECLARATION OF bigamous marriage shall be valid: 1.
NULLITY ☞ The absolute nullity of a absence of the other spouse must have
previous marriage may be invoked for been for four consecutive years, or two
purposes of remarriage on the basis years where there was danger of death 2.
solely of a final judgment declaring such well-founded belief of the present spouse
previous marriage void. that absent spouse was already dead
NOTES: 3. judicial declaration of presumptive
✍ For purposes of remarriage, the only death
legally acceptable basis for declaring a
previous marriage an absolute nullity is EFFECTS OF TERMINATION OF
a final judgment declaring such SUBSEQUENT MARRIAGE: (ICADI) 1.
previous marriage void, whereas, for Children of the subsequent marriage
purposes other than remarriage, other conceived prior to its termination shall
evidence is acceptable. (Domingo vs. be considered legitimate;
CA) 2. The absolute community or conjugal
✍ In a case for concubinage, the partnership shall be dissolved and
accused need not present a final liquidated. If either spouse acted in
judgment declaring his marriage void bad faith, his/her share in the net
for he can adduce evidence in the profits shall be forfeited:
criminal case of the nullity of his a. in favor of the common children; b.
marriage other than proof of a final if none, in favor of the children of the
judgment declaring his marriage void. guilty spouse by previous marriage;
Hence, the pendency of the civil action or
for nullity of marriage does not pose a c. in default of children, in favor of the
prejudicial question in a criminal case innocent spouse;
for concubinage. 3. Donations by reason of the marriage
remain valid except if the donee
✍ Parties to the marriage should not be contracted the marriage in bad faith;
permitted to judge for themselves its
4. The innocent spouse may revoke the
nullity, for the same must be submitted
designation of the spouse in bad faith
to the judgment of the competent
as the beneficiary in any insurance
courts and only when the nullity of the
policy; and
marriage is so declared can it be held
5. The spouse who contracted the
as void, and so long as there is no
subsequent marriage in bad faith
such declaration, the presumption is
shall be disqualified to inherit from the
that the marriage exists for all intents
innocent spouse by testate or
and purposes. Therefore, he who
intestate succession.
cohabits with a woman not his wife,
NOTE: The above effects apply in
before the judicial declaration of nullity
voidable bigamous marriages. Except for
of the marriage, assumes the risk of
(1), the above effects also apply to
being prosecuted for concubinage.
marriages which are annulled or declared
(Beltran vs. People, June 20, 2000)
void ab initio under Art. 40 of the Code.
BIGAMOUS MARRIAGES
DECLARATION OF PRESUMPTIVE
DEATH ☞ Requisites: (MR-BF)
A marriage contracted
1. That the absentee spouse has been
by any person during the subsistence of a
missing for 4 consecutive years or 2
previous valid marriage shall be null and
consecutive years if the
void.(Gomez vs. Lipana)
disappearance occurred where there
When the following
/
establish that he had a well-founded belief Fraudulent means of obtaining consent of
required by law that his absent wife was either party
already dead that would sustain the 4. Vitiated consent of either party through
issuance of a court order declaring force, intimidation or undue influence
presumptive death. In the case of RP vs. 5. Physical incapability of either party to
Nolasco, The SC believed that consummate the marriage with the
respondent Nolasco failed to conduct a other, and such incapacity continues
search for his missing wife with such and appears to be incurable
diligence as to give rise to a “well 6. Sexually-transmissible disease of either
founded belief” that she is dead. When he party found to be serious and appears
arrived in San Jose, Antique after learning to be incurable
of his wife’s departure, instead of seeking
the help of local authorities or of the NOTE: Mode of ratification for Nos. 1-4 is
British embassy, he secured another COHABITATION. In Nos. 5 & 6, there is
seaman’s contract and went to London, a no ratification to speak of since the defect
vast city of many millions of inhabitants, to is permanent. The latter can be
look for her there. (RP vs. Nolasco) convalidated only by prescription, i.e. 5
years from the date of marriage.
Effect of Reappearance of Absent Specifically, in no.5, the healthy spouse
Spouse: may still annul the marriage within 5yrs.
The subsequent after celebration.
bigamous marriage under Article 41
remains valid despite reappearance of
the absentee spouse. Circumstances amounting to Fraud
under Article 46: (SPND)
If the reappearance was
made in a sworn statement 1. Non-disclosure of a previous conviction
by final judgment of the other party of
recorded in the civil registry, the
a crime involving moral turpitude;
subsequent marriage is “automatically
terminated.” 2. Concealment by the wife of the fact that
at the time of the marriage, she was
If there Pregnant by a man other than her
was a previous judgment annulling or husband;
declaring the first marriage a nullity, the 3. Concealment of a Sexually
subsequent bigamous marriage remains transmissible disease, regardless of
valid. its nature, existing at the time of the
marriage; and
VOIDABLE MARRIAGES 4. Concealment of Drug addiction,
☞ Grounds: (UP-FAVS) habitual alcoholism, homosexuality or
1. Age of the party in whose behalf it is lesbianism existing at the time of the
sought to have the marriage annulled marriage.
was 18 years of age or over but below
21, and the marriage was solemnized NOTES:
without the consent of the parents,
✍ Misrepresentation as to character,
guardian or person exercising
health, rank, fortune or chastity is not
substitute parental
a ground for annulment.
authority over the party, in that order,
and both lived together as husband ✍ The enumeration in Article 46 is
and wife; EXCLUSIVE. (Anaya vs. Palaroan)
2. Unsound mind of either party 3.
2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND SUBJECT CHAIRPERSONS Maricel
Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC-
Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VC-EDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark
David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
/
ceased Impotence exists at the time permanent c. incurable
Requisites for annulment of the celebration of the d. The impotence is unknown
due to Impotence under marriage to the other spouse
Art.45(5) (CUPIN) a. b. The impotence is
2. Fraud Injured party w/in 5 years from
the dis e. The other spouse must not also be
covery of impotent
fraud
the insanity Article 45(6) (ICSIIF) 1.
(b) relatives, Either party is inflicted with a
3. incapabi lity to guardians or sexually transmissible disease
consum persons ha
(STD)
mate ving legal
Injured party w/in 5 years after charge of the
insane ADDITIONAL
the
celebration (c) insane REQUIREMENTS FOR
of the spouse ANNULMENT OR
marriage (a) anytime before the death of DECLARATION OF
Doctrine of Triennial either NULLITY
party
Cohabitation ☞ presumption 1. Prosecuting attorney or
(b) anytime before the death of
that the husband is impotent either fiscal should:
should the wife still remain a party a. Take steps to prevent
virgin after 3 years of living (c) during lucid collusion between the parties
together with her husband. interval or after b. Take care that evidence is
regaining sanity not fabricated or suppressed
4. Insanity (a) sane spouse who Requisites for annulment 2. The following must be
has no due to Disease under
knowledge of
5. Non consent (a) anytime before the a. Partition and c. Recording of the
(a) parent/ legal “no distribution of the judgment of
guardian consent” party properties of the annulment or absolute
having charge of the “no reaches 21 (b) w/in 5 spouses nullity.
consent” years after reaching 21
party b. Delivery of the
(b) ”no consent “ party accomplished: children’s NOTES:
presumptive legitimes
6. STD Injured party w/in 5 years after parties had arranged to make it
the appear that a ground existed or had
celebration been committed although it was not,
of the
or if the parties had connived to bring
marriage
about a matrimonial case even in the
absence of grounds therefore.
NOTE: In Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5, when
(Ocampo vs. Florenciano)
cohabitation takes place after the defect
ceases to exist, the prescriptive period is ✍ A grant of annulment of marriage or
rendered moot and academic. Whichever legal separation by default is fraught
/
00-11-01-SC)
☞ took effect on March 15, 2003 ☞ this NOTES:
Rule shall govern petitions for declaration ✍ Cooling-off Period – 6 months period
of absolute nullity of void marriages and designed to give the parties enough
annulment of voidable marriages under time to further contemplate their
the Family Code of the Philippines. positions with the end in view of
☞ the Rules of Court has suppletory attaining reconciliation between them.
application ✍ The enumeration in Article 55
☞ for a more comprehensive discussion regarding legal separation is
on the procedural aspects of the EXCLUSIVE. (Lacson vs. San Jose
Rule, please refer to the Remedial Lacson)
Law Memory Aid.
Grounds for denial of petition:
LEGAL SEPARATION (CCCC-MP-DR)
☞ Grounds: (SAMBA-LIPAD)
a. Condonation -NOTE: failure of the
1. repeated physical violence or grossly husband to look for his adulterous
abusive conduct directed against the wife is NOT condonation to wife's
petitioner, a common child, or a child adultery. (Ocampo vs. Florenciano)
of the petitioner
b. Consent
2. attempt of the respondent to corrupt or c. Connivance
induce the petitioner, a common d. Collusion
child, or a child of the petitioner, to e. Mutual Guilt
engage in prostitution, or connivance f. Prescription
in such corruption or inducement g. Death of either party during the
3. attempt by the respondent against the pendency of the case (Lapuz-Sy vs.
life of the petitioner Eufemio)
4. final judgment sentencing the h. Reconciliation of the spouses during
respondent to imprisonment of more the pendency of the case
than 6 years even if pardoned
5. drug addiction or habitual alcoholism of Effects of filing petition:
the respondent a. The spouses shall be entitled to live
6. lesbianism or homosexuality of the separately from each other.
respondent
b. The husband shall have no more right
7. abandonment of the petitioner by the to have sexual intercourse with his
respondent without justifiable cause wife.
for more than 1 year
c. In the absence of an agreement
8. physical violence or moral pressure to between the parties, the court shall
compel petitioner to change religious designate the husband, the wife, or a
or political affiliation
3rd person to manage the absolute
9. contracting by respondent of a community or conjugal partnership
subsequent bigamous marriage; and 10.
property.
sexual infidelity or perversion.
2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND SUBJECT CHAIRPERSONS Maricel
Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC-
Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VC-EDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark
David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
/
Cannot be rights allowed during
included the marriage except in
3. property acquired case of judicial
May be included during the marriage by separation of property.
provided donation is gratuitous title, except The waiver must be in
Future mortis causa
property
when the donor, a public instrument.
No limit
May be donated but up except that donor shall testator or grantor
to 1/5 of leave expressly provides Administration of the
donor’s present property property otherwise community
enough for his support NOTE: No waiver of
Grounds for Art. 86, FC Arts. 760, 764, & 765, It shall
revocation NCC belong to both spouses jointly.
property
1. In case of disagreement,
Rule on Donation Between Spouses husband’s decision shall prevail. 2. In
During Marriage case one spouse is incapacitated or
VOID, either direct or unable to participate in the
indirect donation administration of the common
1. moderate gifts on properties, other spouse may assume
occasions of family celebrations sole powers. NOTE: These powers do
2. donations mortis causa not include:
NOTE: This rule also applies to a. Disposition
common-law spouses. (Article 87, Family b. encumbrance
Code)
NOTE: Any alienation or encumbrance is
Grounds for Revocation (VIRAL-CN) 1. void if without the written consent of the
marriage Not celebrated or declared Void other spouse
ab initio except those made in marriage
settlements Rule on Game of Chance
2. marriage without parental Consent 3. ☞ LOSS: Shall be borne by the loser
marriage is Annulled and donee is in bad spouse and shall not be charged to
faith the community property
4. upon Legal separation, the donee ☞ WINNINGS: Shall form part of the
being the guilty spouse community property
5. complied Resolutory condition 6.
donee commits acts of Ingratitude Steps in Liquidation of AC:
(IP-DDP) 1. Inventory
SYSTEM OF ABSOLUTE COMMUNITY a. Inventory of Community Property b.
(AC) ☞ The property regime of the Inventory of separate property of the
spouses in the absence of a marriage wife
settlement or when the marriage is
2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND SUBJECT CHAIRPERSONS Maricel
Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC-
Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VC-EDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark
David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
/
4. fruits of the conjugal property 5. spouse
acquired through occupation 6. net fruits 3. Payment of debts to each spouse 4.
of their exclusive property 7. share of Payment of obligations to third parties
either spouse in hidden treasure 5. Delivery of exclusive properties 6.
Payment of losses and deterioration of
Exclusive Property Of Each Spouse: movables belonging to each spouse
(OGRE) 7. Delivery of presumptive legitimes 8.
1. that which is brought to the marriage Division of the net conjugal partnership
as his/her own properties
2. acquired during the marriage by
gratuitous title NOTE: Property bought on installments
3. acquired by right of redemption, barter paid partly from exclusive funds of the
or exchange with property belonging spouses and partly form conjugal funds:
to either spouse a. If full ownership was vested before
4. purchased with exclusive money of the marriage – it shall belong to
either spouse the buyer-spouse
b. If full ownership was vested during
Rules In Cases Of Improvement Of the marriage - it shall belong to
Exclusive Property the conjugal partnership
1. Reverse Accession – if the cost of the
improvement and the plus value is Charges Upon and Obligations Of AC
more than the value of the principal and CP:
property at the time of the 1. Support for family except for
improvement, the property becomes illegitimate children of either spouse;
conjugal 2. Debts and obligations which must have
2. Accession – if the cost of the been contracted:
improvement of the plus value is a. by administrator-spouse for the
equal to or less than the value of the benefit of the family;
principal property at the time of the b. by both spouses; or
improvement, the entire property c. by one spouse with the consent of
becomes the exclusive property of the the other;
spouse. 3. Debts and obligations without marital
consent provided the family was
Steps In Liquidation Of CP: benefited;
(DIRDO-DIP) 1. Inventory of the Conjugal 4. All taxes, liens, charges and expenses
Partnership of Gains assets including major or minor repairs upon
2. Restitution of advances made to each the community or conjugal property;
/
debtor-spouse. a. petitioner’s spouse has been
✍ The conjugal partnership property sentenced with a penalty which
shall likewise be liable for the carries with it civil interdiction;
payment of the personal debts of b. loss of parental authority of the
either spouse insofar as they have petitioner’s spouse as decreed by the
redounded to the benefit of the family. court;
✍ Indirect benefits that might accrue to a c. petitioner’s spouse has been judicially
husband in his signing a surety or declared an absentee; d. abandonment by
guarantee agreement not in favor the petitioner’s spouse and failure to
view would put in peril the conjugal comply with the obligations to the family;
partnership property by allowing it to e. spouse granted power of administration
be given gratuitously as in cases of in marriage settlement abused such
donation of conjugal partnership power; and
property, which is prohibited. (Ayala f. at the time of the petition, spouses are
Investment Corp. vs. CA) separated in fact for at least 1 year
and the possibility for reconciliation is
Grounds For Termination Of Absolute highly improbable.
Community And Conjugal Partnership:
(LADS) NOTE: The spouses contribute to the
family expenses proportionately with their
1. decree of legal separation
2. annulment or declaration of nullity of income and the value of their properties.
marriage However, the liability of the spouses to the
creditors for family expenses is solidary.
3. death of either spouses
4. judicial separation of property
PROPERTY REGIME OF UNIONS
REGIME OF SEPARATION OF WITHOUT MARRIAGE
PROPERTY ☞ Causes: (CLAAPS) Art. 147 Art. 148
of the family but in creditors cannot go
favor of his employer against the conjugal Applica bility 1. With legal
corporation are not partnership property 1. Without impediment to marry
legal 2. Adulterous
the benefits that can of the husband in
impediment to marry relationships 3.
be considered as satisfying the 2. Void Bigamous or
giving a direct obligation subject of marriages due to polygamous marriages
advantage accruing tothe surety agreement. absence of formal 4. Incestuous
the family. Hence, the A contrary requisite
2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND SUBJECT CHAIRPERSONS Maricel
Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC-
Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VC-EDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark
David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
/
declared against its legitimacy or have sexual intercourse with his wife
was sentenced as an adultress within the 1st 120 days of the 300
6. Legally adopted days immediately preceding the
7. Legitimated, conceived and born child’s birth, due to:
outside of wedlock of parents a. physical incapacity of the husband;
without impediment at the time of b. husband and the wife were living
conception and had subsequently separately; or
married c. serious illness of the husband
which absolutely prevented
Illegitimate Children sexual intercourse
Those conceived and 2. biological or scientific proof that the
born outside a valid marriage are child could not have been that of the
illegitimate. husband; and
Children who are: 3. written authorization or ratification of
1. born of marriages which are void either parent for artificial insemination
ab initio such as bigamous and was obtained through mistake, fraud,
incestuous marriages and violence, intimidation or undue
marriage was declared void for influence.
being contrary to law and public
policy B. Prescriptive periods
2. of voidable marriages born after 1. one year, from knowledge of birth or
the decree of annulment recording in the civil register, if
husband or heirs lives in the SAME
Rules on Impugning city/municipality
Legitimacy A. Grounds (PBA) 2. two years, if resides in the Phils.
1. physical impossibility of the husband to
2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND SUBJECT CHAIRPERSONS Maricel
Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC-
Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VC-EDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark
David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
/
amended any crime involving moral
Article 176, FC turpitude g. emotionally and
Receive support according to FC psychologically capable of
Receive support from parents Legitime is ½ of the legitime of a caring for children
Entitled to the legitime & other legitimate child
successional rights parent of the adoptee 2. Alien:
2) adopter is the spouse of the a. same qualifications as a
R.A. No. 9255 adoptee’s parent Filipino b. country has
Use of mother‘s surname f. has not been convicted of diplomatic relations
NOTE: However, RA 9255
with the Phil.
☞ An Act Allowing Illegitimate Children to
c. has been living in the Phil. for at
use the surname of their Father,
least three (3) continuous years
amending for the purpose Article 176
prior to the application for
of EO No. 209, otherwise known as
adoption and maintains such
the "FAMILY CODE OF THE
residence until the adoption
PHILIPPINES":
decree is entered, except when
☞ Approved February 24, 2004
1) former Filipino citizen who
seeks to adopt a relative
Illegitimate children may use the
surname of their father if: within the 4th degree of
1. their filiation has been expressly consanguinity or affinity
recognized by the father through the 2) one who seeks to adopt the
record of birth appearing in the civil legitimate or illegitimate child
register, or of his/her Filipino spouse
2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND SUBJECT CHAIRPERSONS Maricel
Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC-
Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VC-EDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark
David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
/
3. the legitimate/adopted children, 10 adoption so as to impose a liability upon
years old or over, of the adopter and the adopting parents accruing at the time
adoptee when the adopting parents had no actual
4. the illegitimate children, 10 years old or or physical custody over the adopted
over, of the adopter if living with the child. Retroactive effect may perhaps be
adopter and the latter's spouse given to the granting of the petition for
5. spouse of the adopter and adoptee adoption where such is essential to permit
the accrual of some benefit or advantage
Effectivity of Decree of Adoption in favor of the adopted child. To hold that
parental authority had been retroactively
☞ a decree of adoption shall be effective lodged in the adopting parents so as to
as of the date the original petition was burden them with liability for a tortious act
filed. It applies also in case the that they could not have foreseen and
petitioner(s) dies before the issuance of which they could have prevented would
the decree of adoption to protect the be unfair and unconscionable. (Tamargo
interest of the adoptee. vs. CA 209 S 518)
2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND SUBJECT CHAIRPERSONS Maricel
Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC-
Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VC-EDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark
David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
/
1. Legal – that which is required or given other: 1. spouses
by law 2. legitimate ascendants and descendants
2. Judicial – required by the court to be 3. parents and their legitimate children
given whether pendente lite or in a and the legitimate and illegitimate
final judgment children of the latter
3. Conventional – given by agreement 4. parents and their illegitimate children
and the legitimate and illegitimate
Characteristics: (PIN-ERV) children of the latter
1. Personal 5. legitimate brothers and sisters whether
2. Intransmissible full or half-blood
3. Not subject to waiver or compensation
4. Exempt from attachment or execution NOTE: Support shall be in proportion to
5. Reciprocal on the part of those who are the resources or means of the giver and
by law bound to support each other to the necessities of the recipient.
6. Variable
/
2. If the child is illegitimate, for the child are ordinarily 3. parents are the usufructuary
parental authority is with the 3. child is also the usufructuary, but
mother. the child’s use of the property shall
be secondary to the collective daily
needs of the family
Parental Preference Rule 4. property administered by the
4. property administered by the child
☞ the natural parents, who parents
are of good character and
who can reasonably provide Termination of PA
PERMANENT TEMPORARY
2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND SUBJECT CHAIRPERSONS Maricel
Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC-
Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VC-EDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark
David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
/
2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND SUBJECT CHAIRPERSONS Maricel
Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC-
Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VC-EDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark
David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)