Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
IN
STEEL RE-ROLLING INDUSTRY
By : Nitendra Dewangan
Mail : devangann@pcra.org
Mobile : 9406122508
SALARY
5%
CONSUMABLES
5% ELECT
18%
COST BREAK UP FOR REROLLING
INDUSTRIES – COAL UNIT
BURNING
LOSS COAL
21% 38%
LABOUR
11%
SALARY
CONSUMABLES ELECT
5%
5% 20%
FURNACES
What is a Furnace?
Forging
Re-rolling
Furnace According Periodical (Batch / continuous
classification to mode of pusher)
charging Continuous Pot
Glass tank
melting
(regenerative /
Mode of heat Recuperative recuperative)
recovery
Regenerative
Characteristics of an Efficient Furnace
Outflow Heating
Viscosity of furnace Temp. below Temp. at which easy Temp. for proper
oil in Redwood no. 1 which oil is not pumpability can be atomization
@ 37.8oC pumpable achieved
(100 oF)
TOTAL KWH SAVING POTENTIAL PER ANNUM = 5,249 KWH PER ANNUM
IN PRACTICE – 20 TO 25%
42 TO 45 %
IN FLUE GAS
FLUE GAS
MOISTURE
9.28 %
DRY
UNACCOUN
RADIATION
OPOENING
TABLE
LOSSES
LOSSES
10 %
2.7%
9%
Performance Evaluation of a
Typical Furnace
Wall Loss:
Radiation (opening) loss
Wall losses:
Air infiltration
Stored Heat Loss:
Figure 4.11 wall losses
50 55
75 63
100 71
EXCESS AIR – AFFECTS AND CONTROL
1. Air – O2 – 23 % Useful , N2 – 77 % Not useful
2. All gases and extra Air ( O2 + N2 ) leaving athigh
temp .
3. 10 % extra air – 1 % fuel loss – Observed values –
300 % in coal and 110 % in Oil .
4 Other effect-
a. Reduction in flame temp.
b. Increase the burning losses.
c. Cost due to extra mass handling .
d. Increase in initial heating time .
e. Reducing the overall furnace temperature .
f. Results in non uniform heating of material .
AIR FUEL RATIO
FUEL O2 % IN FLUE GAS
S. No. Item
1 Weight of 8 Billets before charging 481.5
Align burner
properly to avoid
touching the
material
To reduce scale
loss
8 Extra Heat for extra heating per day = 326700.00 Kcal /day
9 Furnace Efficiency = 25 %
7 lacs /year
LOW TEMPERATURE OF MATERIAL
1. It’s most of the time is non uniform temp. instead low
temp.( Extreme Range observed in the same mat. From
1180 C to 1300 C )
2. Major Factors for this problem
A. Furnace Design and mismatch between capacity and actual
production.
B. Changing in production speed during the day’s operation.
C. Slow movement of hot material between stands.
D. Improper material feeding in the furnace .
E. Improper combustion
F. Use of unnecessary measures like putting extra material
layer, coating of lime solution etc
G. Improper burner alignment and operation .
H. Changing the fuel setting very frequently.
I. No temperature measuring device .
4) Reducing Heat Loss from Furnace
Openings
Heat loss through openings consists of direct radiation and
combustion gas that leaks through openings.
The heat loss from an opening can be calculated using the formula:
Q=4.88 x T 4 x a x A x H … k.Cal/hr
100
T: absolute temperature (K),
a: factor for total radiation
A: area of opening,
H: time (Hr)
5)Maintaining correct amount of
furnace draught
16
Consumption
14
FUEL GALLON/HR.
10 50
S.F.C.
8
40
6
30
4
20
2
10
Comb. Air
temp
3. IMPROVEMENT IN COMBUSTION
COLD
HOT FLUE
FLUE
GASES
GASES
COLD HOT
COMB. COMB.
AIR AIR
RECUPERATOR EFFICIENCY AND
SAVING POTENTIAL BY INSULATION OF HOT COMBUSTION AIR LINE
RECUPERATOR EFFICIENCY
SALIENT POINTS
• As wall thickness increases, heat loss reduces
• As thickness of insulation increase, heat loss
reduces
• Effect of insulation is better :- (Roughly 1 cm of
insulation brick is equivalent to 5 to 8 cm of
refractory)
• In intermittent furnaces – (Thin wall of
insulations are preferred than thick wall of
refractory to reduces heat stored
5. Ceramic fiber to be used in intermittent
furnaces
ENERGY CONSERVATION
IN FURNACES
Refractory/Insulation Thickness
4 4
5/4 t1 273 t2 273
Q a x (t1 t2 ) 4.88 E x
100 100
where
a : factor regarding direction of the surface of natural convection
ceiling = 2.8, side walls = 2.2, hearth = 1.5
tl : temperature of external wall surface of the furnace ( C)
t2 : temperature of air around the furnace ( C)
E: emissivity of external wall surface of the furnace
Ceramic
Fibre
Rapid heat-up
Increased heat transfer at steady state
Improved temperature uniformity
Increased refractory life
Elimination of refractory dust.
High Emissivity Coatings
ENERGY CONSERVATION
IN FURNACES
General Observations of Furnace
Load
4% Motors other than Fans
• Lighting & Airconditioning – 69% & Blowers 567.5 HP
KW
ø2
ø1
A
KVAR
KVA
B
As can be clearly seen KVA requirement has been reduced for the same
KW requirement in case A.
• Motor Lifetime
• Size Motors for Efficiency
• Proper Maintenance
• Energy Efficient Motors
• Reactive Power Compensation
• Issue of Motor Rewinding
Why ?
Energy-efficient
motors, are 2 to 8%
more efficient than
standard motors.
110 150 24 29 33 37
132 180 31 36 38 43
160 218 35 41 44 52
200 274 43 47 53 61
250 340 52 57 63 71
280 380 57 63 70 79
355 482 67 76 86 96
400 544 78 82 97 106
450 610 87 93 107 117
• The Efficiency
& Power factor
depends on the
loading of the
motor.
Why ?
• The fixed Losses remain the
same at lower loads therefore
Size motors to run primarily in the
65% to 100% load range.
• Demand Analyzer
• Digital power recorder
• Lux Meter
• Anemo meter
• Digital Manometer
• Techometer
• The motor frame and bearing plates (if accessible) are not
unduly hot;
• Check the motors & driven equipment for proper alignment &
Inspect the condition of the belts.
Location wise
• Raipur-122 Nos
• Bhilai –Durg –Rajnandgaon -23 Nos
• Bilaspur-03 Nos
Fuel Used
• Coal Fired - 97 nos
• Oil Fired- 43 Nos
• Producer Gas fired- 8 Nos **
16% 2%
Raipur
Bhilai –Durg -Rajnandgaon
Bilaspur
82%
Product wise distribution
14%
42%
44%
Coal
FO
Producer Gas
Specific Energy Consumption of Rolling Mill using FO as Fuel (Lit of FO/Ton of
Production)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Specific Energy Consumption (Lit of FO/Ton of Production)
Specific Energy consumption of Rolling Mill Using Coal as Fuel
(Kg of Coal/Ton of Product)
250
200
150
100
50
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Specific Energy consumption of Rolling Mill Using Coal as
Fuel (Kg of Coal/Ton of Product)
Variation in % Scale Loss in the Cluster
0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 % Scale loss
Specific Energy Consumption of Rolling Mill using Producer gas (Kg
of Coal/Ton of production) and FO (Lit /Ton of production) as Fuel
90
80
70
60
50
FO consumption in Lit/Ton
40 Coal consumption in Kg/Ton
30
20
10
0
1 2 3 4 5
Specific Power Consumption
130
125
120
KWH/Ton 115
110 Specific Power Consumption
105
100
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37
Units
Variation in Power Factor in the Cluster
0,95
0,9
0,85
0,8
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 Power Factor
TYPICAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION PATTERN
IN ROLLING MILLS
Auxiliaries 10%
Mill Proper
20%
Reheating
Furnace 70%
(Base Case: Solid pusher hearth, oil fired and 15tph continuous reheating furnace
with conventional features with 20 hours/day operation, 250 days working in a
year)
PROJECT BENEFITS
I. Direct Benefits
Consumption of energy & other Unit Status in the Target / Expected
important performance beginning of Outcome after
parameters of re-rolling mills the Project project
(Model Units) completion