Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 7

LESSON 1.

HUMAN FLOURISHING

OBJECTIVES
At the end of this lesson, the students should be able to:

1. Analyze the human condition in order to deeply reflect and express philosophical
ramifications that are meaningful to the student as a part of society;
2. Critique human flourishing vis-à-vis the progress of science and technology so that
the student can define for himself/herself the meaning of the good life.

CONCEPTUAL BACKGROUND
With the emergence of the Environmental crisis brought by new technologies that change
social structures, students should be given an opportunity to reflect on those issues that have a
significant impact on society. This course will reinforce the integral development of learners to
become truly human.
This lesson deals with interactions between science and technology and social, cultural,
political, and economic contexts that shape and are shaped by them. (CMO No. 20, series of 2013)
This interdisciplinary lesson engages students to confront the realities brought about by science
and technology in society. Such realities pervade the personal, the public, and the global aspects
of our living and are integral to human development. Scientific knowledge and technological
development happen in the context of society with all its socio-political, cultural, economic, and
philosophical underpinnings at play. This lesson seeks to instill reflective knowledge in the
students that they can live a good life and display ethical decision making in the face of scientific
and technological advancement.
The progress of human civilizations throughout history mirrors the development of
science and technology. The human person, as both the bearer and beneficiary of science and
technology, flourishes and finds meaning in the world that he/she builds. In the person’s pursuit of
the good life, he/she may unconsciously acquire, consume or destroy what the world has to offer.
It is thus necessary to reflect on the things that truly matter. Science and technology must be taken
as part of human life that merits reflective and –as the German philosopher Martin Heidegger says
–meditative thinking. Science and technology, despite its methodical and technical nature, gives
meaning to the life of a person making his/her way in the world.
To be able to appreciate the fruits of science and technology, they must be examined not
only for their function and instrumentality but also for their greater impact on humanity as a
whole. The various gadgets, machines, appliances, and vehicles are all tools that make human
lives easier because they serve as a means to an end. Their utility lies on providing people with a
certain good, convenience, or knowledge. Meanwhile, medical research employs the best
scientific and technological principles to come up with the cures for diseases and ways to prevent
illnesses to ensure a good quality of life.

What is flourishing?

It is a state where people experience positive emotions, positive psychological functioning


and positive social functioning, most of the time, “living within an optimal range of human
functioning”.

What is Human Flourishing?

35
Human
flourishing is defined as an effort to achieve self-actualization and fulfillment within the context
of a larger community of individuals, each with the right to pursue his or her own such efforts.

It involves the rational use of one’s individual human potentialities, including talents,
abilities and virtues in the pursuit of his freely and rationally chosen values and goals.

Human Flourishing in Science Technology


-
Must be treated as part of human life that needs reflective and meditative thinking.

What is reflective thinking?

It helps to determine an individual’s strengths and weaknesses by allowing individuals to


question values and beliefs, challenge assumptions, recognize biases, acknowledge fears, and find
areas of improvement.

Example: a.) Think about what happened. Learn from the experience; that’s reflective
thinking b) An example Have you ever missed the bus and then thought next time I’ll leave the
house 5 minutes earlier? This is an example of you being reflective: you thought about an
experience and decided to learn from it and do something different the next time.

What is Meditative thinking?

Kind of thinking that thinks the truth of being that belongs to being and listens to it. And
also, it helps us to understand our life’s meaning, placing significance on the individual rather
than the collective. When we “meditate,” we consider our being, our singular truths, and the
meaning of our lives. We, subsequently, develop a self-derived kind of meaning, a real kind of
truth.

Why is human flourishing important?

36
Human flourishing is the reward of the virtues and values and happiness is the goal and
reward of human flourishing. Self-direction (i.e., autonomy) involves the use of one's reason and
is central and necessary for the possibility of attaining human flourishing, self-esteem, and
happiness.

Technology as a Mode of Revealing


First, the essence of technology is not something we make; it is a mode of being, or of
revealing. This means that technological things have their own novel kind of presence, endurance,
and connections among parts and wholes. They have their own way of presenting themselves and
the world in which they operate.

Understanding Heidegger Technology


In his important work, The Question of Technology, Martin Heidegger urges us to
question technology and see beyond people’s common understanding of it.
Who is Martin Heidegger?

Figure 8. Photo of Martin Heidegger


MARTIN HEIDEGGER, a German philosopher and a seminal thinker in the Continental
tradition of philosophy, widely acknowledged to be one of the most original and important
philosophers of the 20th century.

HEIDEGGER’S VIEW ON TECHNOLOGY

Martin Heidegger strongly opposes the view that technology is “a means to an end” or “a
human activity. They said that these two approaches, which he calls, respectively, the
“instrumental” and “anthropological” definitions, are indeed “correct”, but do not go deep enough;
as he says, they are not yet “true.” He also, points out, technological objects are means for ends,
and are built and operated by human beings, but the essence of technology is something else
entirely. Since the essence of a tree is not itself a tree, he points out, so the essence of technology
is not anything technological. What, then, is technology, if it is neither a means to an end nor a
human activity? Technology, according to Heidegger must be understood as “a way of revealing”
(Heidegger 1977, 12).

37
What is revealing?
Revealing is his translation of the Greek word alètheuein, which means ‘to discover’ – to
uncover what was covered over. Related to this verb is the independent noun alètheia, which is
usually translated as “truth,” though Heidegger insists that a more adequate translation would be
“un- concealment.” What is reality?
According to Heidegger, it is not given the same way in all times and all cultures (Seubold
1986, 35-6). It is not something absolute that human beings can ever know once and for all is
relative in the most literal sense of the word – it exists only in relations inaccessible for human
beings. As soon as we perceive or try to understand it, it is not ‘in itself’ anymore, but ‘reality for
us.’

ACTIVITY 1

Instruction: Complete the table below based on your own perception.

Know-Want-Learn
What are the things you already Know, what you Want to learn and what you have
learned from the topics above?
Know Want Learned
already know that I want to learn more I learned that Human
Flourishing is leads to about human flourishing must be
one's happiness, it is an flourishing and what is achieved through a
effort to achieve human the relationship of person's own efforts.
fulfillment and also to human flourishing to Each person has reason
achieve success Science Technology and free will and the
and also how to capacity to initiate
achieve human conduct that will
flourishing and success enhance or inhibit his
flourishing. Rationality,
the cardinal virtue for
human flourishing, can
only gain expression
when a man has
responsibility for his
own choices.

What does Heidegger mean when he says that technology is “a way of revealing”?

Everything we perceive or think of or interact with “emerges out of concealment into


unconcealment, by entering into a particular relation with reality, reality is ‘revealed’ in a specific
way; a) Technology is the way of revealing that characterizes our time.
b) technology embodies a specific way of revealing the world, a revealing in which humans take
power over reality. While the ancient Greeks experienced the ‘making’ of something as ‘helping
something to come into being’ – as Heidegger explains that modern technology is rather a ‘forcing
into being’. Technology reveals the world as raw material, available for production and
manipulation.

38
WHY IS TECHNOLOGY NOT A HUMAN ACTIVITY?

According to Heidegger, there is something wrong with the modern, technological culture
we live in today. In our ‘age of technology’ reality can only be present as a raw material (as a
‘standing reserve’). This state of affairs has not been brought about by humans; the technological
way of revealing was not chosen by humans. Rather, our understanding of the world - our
understanding of ‘being’, of what it means ‘to be’ - develops through the ages. In our time ‘being’
has the character of a technological ‘framework’, from which humans approach the world in a
controlling and dominating way. Every attempt to climb out of technology throws us back in. The
only way out for Heidegger is “the will not to will”. We need to open up the possibility of relying
on technologies while not becoming enslaved to them and seeing them as manifestations of an
understanding of being.

ACTIVITY 2

Instruction: Read and follow the statements enclosed in the box.

Watch the video on “The Magician’s Twin”: CS LEWIS AND THE Case Against
Scientism. Answer the following guide questions.

What is scientism?
**Scientism is the promotion of science as the best or only objective means
by which society should determine normative and epistemological values.
Scientism is a rather strange word, but for reasons that we shall see, a useful
one.. Olson defines scientism as “efforts to extend scientific ideas, methods,
practices, and attitudes to matters of human social and political concern.”
(1) But this formulation is so broad as to render it virtually useless.

How is science comparable to magic?


**Science is the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the
physical and natural world through observation and experiment. Magic is an
unexplained phenomenon of apparently influencing the course of events by
using mysterious or supernatural forces.

Why is science more dangerous than magic?


**Science is far more dangerous than magic because magic fails.
If it does not work then, people could not use it to control the world
while science has the potential that you really can’t control the people .
If you find the right charge, the right treatment, you can manipulate
them. In Science, you don’t have any other way of protecting what you
are doing and so it becomes dangerous.

What is the presented essence of modernity and its consequence?

39
**The essence of modernity is that “ nothing is sacred.” Its consequence
include the human person. When modernity happens, there will be no
distinctions between individuals or humans between animals and vegetables
and all other non-human creatures. Modernity is presented to be the
solution to everything and we are supposed to accept it as the only path to
the future.

What do we need for the science to be good?


**We need to be good people because science is valued by society because
the application of scientific knowledge helps to satisfy many basic human
needs and improve living standards. Finding a cure for cancer and a clean
form of energy are just two topical examples.

ACTIVITY 3

Instructions: Read this article: Forget 'developing' poor countries, it's time to 'dedevelop' rich
countries. Make a Reflection Paper.

Guide Questions for Reflection:

1. Why must we change our paradigm of growth and consumption to that of dedevelopment?
2. What are the terms de-development, de-growth, and zero growth seemingly unacceptable to
the usual framework of human progress?
3. How have we been enframed by the notion of growth?
4. How do we improve our lives and yet reduce consumption?
5. What are the similarities and differences between Heidegger’s and Hickel’s article?

Growth is an inevitable part of human life and society. However, as time


progressed by, people have been engrossed and enframed with the notion of growth
that we forgot our own values and morals. The following are some of the ways in which
we are enframed with the notion of growth: As a country, the government spend a huge
amount of money in order to accommodate the needs of its citizens. According to the
recent trend of growth, it could produce negative outcomes wherein the poor become
more poorer and the rich would amass a bigger amount of money and become richer.
Since we are enframed with the concept of growth, we tend to disregard the impact of
our actions to the environment. We would often convert a large amount of forest of
farm into urban settings.

40
I'd say both are humanist and greenie in view, and concerned with the
destructive nature of powerful human constructs like tech / econ policy. But neither sees
these constructs as inherently bad. They r just big things we made that have gotten out
of hand and need to be used right.
Yet they pitch at diff levels. Heid is concerned w how in touch we r w ourselves,
our being, the world we naturally live in. Tech can drive us from that. Hic's concerns are
more sociopolitical - poverty, sustainability. When resolved, heid has tech reflect us like
a poignant life lesson, while hick has econ improve human life standards and the natural
world.
It is given that " we change our paradigm of growth and consumption to that of
'de-development."
The above-mentioned statement is justified enough because the idea of growth
generally refers to a change thereby leading to the development and the term de-
development refers to stagnation which is not practical.

REFERENC
ES
https://www.coursehero.com/file/44187812/STS-CHAPTER-4-pdf/

https://www.slideshare.net/memijecruz/human-flourishing-in-science-andtechnology-technology-
as-a-mode-of-revealing

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionalsnetwork/2015/sep/23/developing-
poor-countries-de-develop-richcountries-sdgs

http://existentialismatrhodes09.blogspot.com/2009/09/meditative -thinking-more- important-


than.html

McNamara, D. J. et. al. Human Flourishing as Reflected in Progress and


Development. C & E Publishing

41

Вам также может понравиться