Complaint

That on or about December 17,2008 Rebecca Caperton Rutledge did allow to be filed,
disseminated, and or used in the official conduct of a child custody proceeding, child
abuse investigation, and or circuit/juvenile court matter, one Fraudulent Psychological
Evaluation, whereupon the “Test Results” maintained herein, are not those of Roy
Scheulin, and have maintained in the action of Perpetrating Fraud upon this Court,
Tampering with or Fabricating Evidence as per TN Code, Statutes, Laws, Rules.

That these documents herein, are not harmless, and have allowed irreparable harm to
befall the parties to this case, that these documents have Constituted Criminal Contempt
whereby the ability of this Court to function have been impeded by these actions.

39-16-503. Tampering with or fabricating

evidence. —

(a) It is unlawful for any person, knowing that an investigation or official proceeding is
pending or in progress, to:

(1) Alter, destroy, or conceal any record, document or thing with intent to impair its
verity, legibility, or availability as evidence in the investigation or official proceeding;
or

(2) Make, present, or use any record, document or thing with knowledge of its
falsity and with intent to affect the course or outcome of the investigation or official
proceeding.

(b) A violation of this section is a Class

C felony.

[Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1.]

That on or about December 17,2008 Rebecca Caperton Rutledge did allow to be filed,
disseminated, and or used in the official conduct of a child custody proceeding, child
abuse investigation, and or circuit/juvenile court matter, one Fraudulent Psychological
Evaluation, whereupon the “Test Results” maintained herein, are not those of Roy
Scheulin, and have maintained in the action of Perpetrating Fraud upon this Court,
Tampering with or Fabricating Evidence as per TN Code, Statutes, Laws, Rules.

That these documents herein, are not harmless, and have allowed irreparable harm to
befall the parties to this case, that these documents have Constituted Criminal Contempt
whereby the ability of this Court to function have been impeded by these actions.

39-16-507. Coercion of
witness. —
(a) A person commits an offense who, by means of coercion, influences or attempts to
influence a witness or prospective witness in an official proceeding with intent to
influence the witness to:

(1) Testify
falsely;

(2) Withhold any truthful testimony, truthful information,

document or thing; or

(3) Elude legal process summoning the witness to testify or supply evidence, or to
be absent from an official proceeding to which the witness has been legally summoned.

That on or about December 17,2008 Rebecca Caperton Rutledge did allow to be filed,
disseminated, and or used in the official conduct of a child custody proceeding, child
abuse investigation, and or circuit/juvenile court matter, one Fraudulent Psychological
Evaluation, whereupon the “Test Results” maintained herein, are not those of Roy
Scheulin, and have maintained in the action of Perpetrating Fraud upon this Court,
Tampering with or Fabricating Evidence as per TN Code, Statutes, Laws, Rules.

That these documents herein, are not harmless, and have allowed irreparable harm to
befall the parties to this case, that these documents have Constituted Criminal Contempt
whereby the ability of this Court to function has been impeded by these actions.

_____________________________________________________________
39-16-402. Official
misconduct. —

(a) A public servant commits an offense who, with intent to obtain a benefit or to harm
another, intentionally or knowingly:

(1) Commits an act relating to the servant's office or employment that constitutes an
unauthorized exercise of official power;

(2) Commits an act under color of office or employment that exceeds the servant's
official power;

(3) Refrains from performing a duty that is imposed by law or that is clearly
inherent in the nature of the public servant's office or employment;

(4) Violates a law relating to the public servant's office or

employment; or
 (5) Receives any benefit not otherwise
authorized by law.

(b) For purposes of subdivision (a)(2), a public servant commits an act under color of
office or employment who acts or purports to act in an official capacity or takes
advantage of the actual or purported capacity.

(c) It is a defense to prosecution for this offense that the benefit involved was a trivial
benefit incidental to personal, professional or business contact, and involved no
substantial risk of undermining official impartiality.

(d) An offense under this section is a Class

E felony.

(e) Charges for official misconduct may be brought only by indictment, presentment or
criminal information; provided, that nothing in this section shall deny a person from
pursuing other criminal charges by affidavit of complaint.

[Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1; 1990, ch. 980, § 10.]

That on or about December 17,2008 Rebecca Caperton Rutledge did allow to be filed,
disseminated, and or used in the official conduct of a child custody proceeding, child
abuse investigation, and or circuit/juvenile court matter, one Fraudulent Psychological
Evaluation, whereupon the “Test Results” maintained herein, are not those of Roy
Scheulin, Constituting the action of Perpetrating Fraud upon this Court, Tampering with
or Fabricating Evidence as per TN Code, Statutes, Laws, Rules, etc.

That these documents herein, are not harmless, and have allowed irreparable harm to
befall the parties to this case, that these documents have Constituted Criminal Contempt
whereby the ability of this Court to function has been impeded by the actions of Rebecca
Caperton Rutledge.

39-16-403. Official oppression. —

(a) A public servant acting under color of office or employment commits an offense
who:

(1) Intentionally subjects another to mistreatment or to arrest, detention, stop, frisk, halt, search,
seizure, dispossession, assessment or lien when the public servant knows the conduct is unlawful; or

(2) Intentionally denies or impedes another in the exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege,
power or immunity, when the public servant knows the conduct is unlawful.

(b) For purposes of this section, a public servant acts under color of office or employment if the
public servant acts, or purports to act, in an official capacity or takes advantage of the actual or
purported capacity.

(c) An offense under this section is a Class E

felony.

(d) Charges for official oppression may be brought only by indictment, presentment or criminal
information; provided, that nothing in this section shall deny a person from pursuing other criminal
charges by affidavit of complaint.

[Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1; 1990, ch. 980, § 11.]

That on or about December 17,2008 Rebecca Caperton Rutledge did allow to be filed,
disseminated, and or used in the official conduct of a child custody proceeding, child
abuse investigation, and or circuit/juvenile court matter, one Fraudulent Psychological
Evaluation, whereupon the “Test Results” maintained herein, are not those of Roy
Scheulin, Constituting the action of Perpetrating Fraud upon this Court, Tampering with
or Fabricating Evidence as per TN Code, Statutes, Laws, Rules, etc.

That these documents herein, are not harmless, and have allowed irreparable harm to
befall the parties to this case, that these documents have Constituted Criminal Contempt
whereby the ability of this Court to function has been impeded by the actions of Rebecca
Caperton Rutledge.