Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
T&T Clark’s Guides for the Perplexed are clear, concise and accessible introductions
to thinkers, writers and subjects that students and readers can find especially
challenging. Concentrating specifically on what it is that makes the subject difficult
to grasp, these books explain and explore key themes and ideas, guiding the reader
towards a thorough understanding of demanding material.
Forthcoming titles:
Interfaith Relations: A Guide for the Perplexed, Jeffrey Bailey
Eucharist: A Guide for the Perplexed, Ralph N. McMichael
BENEDICT XVI:
A GUIDE FOR THE PERPLEXED
TRACEY ROWLAND
Published by T&T Clark International
A Continuum Imprint
The Tower Building, 11 York Road, London SE1 7NX
80 Maiden Lane, Suite 704, New York, NY 10038
www.continuumbooks.com
Tracey Rowland has asserted her right under the Copyright, Designs
and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as the Author of this work.
Acknowledgements ix
Introduction 1
Chapter 1: The Romantic Antecedents 9
Chapter 2: The Humanist Culture of the Incarnation 25
Chapter 3: Revelation, Tradition and Hermeneutics 48
Chapter 4: The Theological Virtues 71
Chapter 5: History and Ontology after Heidegger 93
Chapter 6: Christianity in the Marketplace of
Faith Traditions 114
Chapter 7: The Vision of Unity 129
Conclusion 152
Notes 161
Select Bibliography 182
Index 195
vii
This page intentionally left blank
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ix
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Tracey Rowland
Beechworth, Eastertide, 2009.
x
INTRODUCTION
1
BENEDICT XVI
2
INTRODUCTION
which was ever presented to students and the mode of its presenta-
tion in manuals was of questionable pedagogical value. Moreover,
this pre-Conciliar Thomism prided itself on being ‘above history’
and marketed itself as the ‘perennial philosophy’. One of the most
helpful and even-handed accounts of it has been provided by
Fergus Kerr in his Twentieth-Century Catholic Theologians: From
Neoscholasticism to Nuptial Mysticism.4 Kerr observes that almost
every significant Catholic theologian after the Second World War
(including Ratzinger) was in some sense in rebellion against this,
and that the most extreme rebel, Hans Küng, was the one who had
been given the longest (seven-year) exposure to it at the Pontifical
Gregorian University in Rome. This is not to say that Kerr thinks it
was all bad, merely that he makes the historical observation that
while twentieth-century Catholic theology began in a neo-scholastic
key, it ended with two successive papacies and their leading theolo-
gians singing the not so baroque tune of the nuptial mystery. Thomas
F O’Meara has presented the following snapshot of the pre-Conciliar
period which goes some of the way to explaining the rebellion:
3
BENEDICT XVI
4
INTRODUCTION
5
BENEDICT XVI
Paul VI, he based the retreat on ideas from that book by Ratzinger.13
From these beginnings the two developed a quarter-century partner-
ship which lasted until the death of John Paul II in 2005.
In his preface to the 2004 edition of the Introduction to Christianity,
Ratzinger reflected on the two watershed years of the second half of
the twentieth century: 1968 and 1989. He began with the observation
that 1968 marked the rebellion of a new generation, which not only
considered postwar reconstruction in Europe as inadequate, but
‘viewed the entire course of history since the triumph of Christianity
as a mistake and a failure’.14 After noting the attraction of Marxism
to the elite of this generation, he further observed that the collapse
of Communist regimes in Europe in 1989 left behind them ‘a sorry
legacy of ruined land and ruined souls’.15 Marxism ultimately failed
the generation of ’68, but even so, at the moment of its collapse
within Europe, Christianity ‘failed to make itself heard as an
epoch-making alternative’.16
The Church in 1989, a decade into the pontificate of John Paul II,
was still wallowing in post-Conciliar introspection and suffering
the political side-effects of sharp internal theological divisions. The
cultural and political weakness of the faith was also in part due to
sociological factors. The emergence of a wealthy Catholic middle
class in the US and the countries of the British Commonwealth,
desperate for acceptance by Protestant elites and wanting to accom-
modate its faith to the culture of modernity, including the adoption
of a decidedly modern attitude to sexuality, created numerous
intellectual and pastoral challenges which were simply beyond the
capacities of many of the clergy to address.17
At the same time in Latin America social and economic problems
were being addressed by a new generation of ecclesial leaders sym-
pathetic to Marxism. Paradoxically, while Catholics in places like
Poland, China, Korea and Vietnam were being persecuted by Com-
munists, true believing Marxists could still be found in Catholic
theology academies outside the Soviet bloc and its Asian derivatives.
As Ratzinger noted, ‘in 1968 there was a fusion of the Christian
impulse with secular and political action and an attempt to baptize
Marxism’.18 This project labelled as liberation theology was particu-
larly strong in countries which were formerly Spanish or Portuguese
colonies such as the Philippines, Honduras, Nicaragua, Argentina
and Brazil. However it was also popular among Catholic intellectual
elites throughout Europe and the Anglophone countries. Ratzinger
6
INTRODUCTION
7
BENEDICT XVI
8
CHAPTER 1
9
BENEDICT XVI
person and the quest for self-transcendence. They chose to enter the
controversy about the relationship between faith and reason only
after deepening their understanding of the relationship between
faith and history.2 History in turn opens onto the terrain of memory
and tradition and ultimately hermeneutics.
In Germany the centre of this Catholic engagement with Romantic
thought was to be found at the University of Tübingen.3 Its leading
theologians were Johann Sebastian Drey (1777–1853); Johann Adam
Möhler (1796–1838) and Johannes Evangelist von Kuhn (1806–
1887). As Grant Kaplan has noted, they followed the lead of Schelling
in rejecting Kant’s project of stripping the positive and historical
from Christianity, of proclaiming Christianity as a pure religion of
reason.4 They also eschewed the post-Kantian tendency to reduce
Christianity to the level of an ethical framework. Drey emphasized
that the Catholic faith is a religion of ‘sentiment’ (Gemüth) as well as
of reason (Verstand) and that revelation is itself an historical event.
This in turn highlighted the importance of the individual in the
reception of revelation. Following the logic of Lessing’s Education
of the Human Race, Drey concluded that what education is for the
individual, revelation is for all of humanity.5 Similarly, von Kuhn
described the philosophy of Christian revelation as ‘the presence of
Christ revealed historically, not dialectically’.6 Meanwhile Möhler
added to this accent on history by positing an organic unity between
the Christian community and Christ. As Kaplan explained, for
Möhler ‘the chain of history from nineteenth-century Swabia to
first-century Palestine is unbroken. In order to be salvific, the saving
truth of Christianity must have been present, even in a truncated
form, for every generation of believers’.7 This is because access to
the truth occurs by living the truth. In a work published in 1988,
Joseph Ratzinger was to describe Möhler as ‘the great reviver of
Catholic theology after the ravages of the Enlightenment’.8
In addition to the cluster of scholars at Tübingen there were other
theologians focused on the issues of the Romantic movement. These
included Johann Michael von Sailer (1751–1832), the Bishop of
Ratisbon, described by some as ‘the Church father of Bavaria’, his
disciple Heinrich Alois Gügler (1782–1827) who became the leader
of the romantic school in Lucerne and one of those who influenced
Möhler, Franz Xaver von Baader (1765–1841) the Professor of
Speculative Theology at Landshut who argued against the Kantian
severance of philosophy from religious traditions, and Matthias
10
THE ROMANTIC ANTECEDENTS
11
BENEDICT XVI
12
THE ROMANTIC ANTECEDENTS
13
BENEDICT XVI
14
THE ROMANTIC ANTECEDENTS
15
BENEDICT XVI
16
THE ROMANTIC ANTECEDENTS
17
BENEDICT XVI
Man is open to the truth, but the truth is not in some place but
rather in the concrete-living, in the figure of Jesus Christ. This
concrete-living demonstrates truth precisely through the fact that
18
THE ROMANTIC ANTECEDENTS
it is the unity of what are apparent opposites, since the logos and
the a-logon are united in it.47
Not only did Guardini inspire Pieper and the young Ratzinger but
he also taught Hans Urs von Balthasar at the University of Berlin.
Balthasar was later to publish a work of tribute to him under the title
Romano Guardini. Reform aus dem Ursprung.48 As a Jesuit student in
the years 1931–1937 von Balthasar had his own taste of the dryness
of scholastic theology and through the inspiration of his confrères
Erich Przywara and Henri de Lubac, he set his studies on a radically
different course. Przywara, one of those responsible for introducing
Newman to a German audience, empathized with von Balthasar’s
intellectual frustration and counselled him to learn the scholastic
philosophy with ‘an attitude of serene detachment’. Accordingly,
von Balthasar claims to have sat through classes on scholasticism,
with his nose defiantly glued to the works of the non-scholastic
Augustine, and with his ears plugged.49 While Przywara got him
through his studies of pre-Conciliar scholasticism, de Lubac, he
wrote, ‘showed us the way beyond the scholastic stuff to the Fathers
of the Church’, and ‘while all the others went off to play football’,
he, Jean Daniélou and Henri Bouillard read Origen, Gregory of
Nyssa and Maximus the Confessor.50
De Lubac was influenced by Maurice Blondel’s account of tradi-
tion as presented in his History and Dogma (1903) and Blondel in
turn had been influenced by Newman whose work had been intro-
duced to a French audience by Henri Bremond. Blondel also came
to know of the Tübingen school through Georges Goyau, who was
an author of an important study on Johann Adam Möhler. In his
introduction to the English translation of Blondel’s The Letter on
Apologetics and History and Dogma, Alexander Dru (a close friend
of Theodor Haecker thanks to their mutual dedication to Kierkeg-
aard) noted that the very first edition of Annales de Philosophie
Chrétienne (a journal owned by Blondel and to which he was a
frequent contributor) ‘pointed to the need to break away from the
narrow Latin, Roman and Mediterranean conception of Catholicism
by pointing to the relevance of the German Catholic writers of the
Romantic period’.51 He also noted that Blondel, Bremond and
Goyau – among others – were ‘carrying on (unbeknown, at first,
to themselves) the tradition of Tübingen (and in some respects
therefore of Newman)’.52
19
BENEDICT XVI
20
THE ROMANTIC ANTECEDENTS
21
BENEDICT XVI
22
THE ROMANTIC ANTECEDENTS
‘bring God down to the level of the people’ and was to describe such
actions as a form of ‘apostasy’. In The Meaning of Christian Brother-
hood and in Principles of Catholic Theology Ratzinger also gave
significant space to what he described as the authentically ‘biblical’
inspiration of von Hildebrand’s depiction of the Christian attitude
of readiness to change and convert to the radical newness of Christ.
This topic pervades von Hildebrand’s publications but its most
extensive treatment can be found in his Transformation in Christ.64
Ratzinger’s criticisms of Karl Rahner’s account of human freedom
in Hearers of the Word are focused on this theme of conversion and
transformation in Christ.
The expression ‘the Rhine flowed into the Tiber’ is a well-worn
cliché used to explain what happened within the Catholic Church in
the first half of the 1960s. Many ideas which had been percolating
in the theology academies of Munich, Lucerne and Tübingen rose
to the surface as the bishops of the world, or at least a significant
majority of them, came to accept that neo-scholasticism had its
limitations.65 It was the ideas of those who were humanists by disposi-
tion, interested in anthropological questions, often multidisciplinary
and above all concerned to understand the theological significance
of history and tradition, which became ascendant.
None of the above is intended to suggest that Ratzinger/Benedict
XVI is neatly pigeon-holed as the Tübingen School’s most illustrious
heir, or a German apogee of John Henry Newman, or the Bavarian
soul mate of the Swiss von Balthasar. Like all great scholars, he is
not so easily labeled and packaged. However, one might at least
conclude that there is some degree of truth in these tags, and that it
is not possible to understand Ratzinger without a certain familiarity
with the Romantic reaction against the rationalism of the Enlighten-
ment and with the Catholic wing of the Romantic tradition. Indeed,
it helps to have knowledge of the Romantic movement generally,
including the works of Friedrich Nietzsche, with whom Ratzinger is
a frequent interlocutor.
Cardinal Joachim Meisner has suggested that Ratzinger is the
‘Mozart of theology’, and while it is true that Ratzinger does not
jettison the classical repertoire, given the influence of the Romantic
movement on German theology, coupled with Ratzinger’s recogni-
tion that the failure to provide an adequate account of the mediation
of history in the realm of ontology represented the single greatest
23
BENEDICT XVI
24
CHAPTER 2
25
BENEDICT XVI
26
THE HUMANIST CULTURE OF THE INCARNATION
The Gospel and the Church are plundered like a fruit tree, but
the fruits, once separated from the tree, go rotten and are no
longer fruitful. The ‘ideas’ of Christ cannot be separated from
Him, and so they are of no use to the world unless they are fought
for by Christians who believe in Christ, or at least by men who
are inwardly, though unconsciously, open to Him and governed
by Him. Radiance is only possible when the radiant centre is
permanently active and alive. There can be no shining from stars
long dead.4
27
BENEDICT XVI
The Truth is that only in the mystery of the incarnate Word does
the mystery of man take on light. For Adam, the first man, was a
figure of Him who was to come, namely Christ the Lord. Christ,
the final Adam, by the revelation of the mystery of the Father,
and His Love, fully reveals man to man himself and makes his
supreme calling clear.
28
THE HUMANIST CULTURE OF THE INCARNATION
29
BENEDICT XVI
30
THE HUMANIST CULTURE OF THE INCARNATION
longing into flight and moves us toward the truly Beautiful, to the
Good in itself’.21 Ratzinger also quotes the fourteenth-century
Byzantine theologian Nicholas Cabasilas:
31
BENEDICT XVI
without the pain of the cross and the fear of sin’, which Ratzinger
suggests may have become ‘too overpowering in the images of the
late Middle Ages’.28 Today, he concludes, Christian art stands between
two fires:
It must oppose the cult of the ugly, which says that everything else,
anything beautiful, is a deception and that only the depiction of
what is cruel, base, and vulgar is the truth and true enlightenment.
And it must withstand the deceptive beauty that diminishes
man instead of making him great and that, for that very reason,
is false.29
32
THE HUMANIST CULTURE OF THE INCARNATION
33
BENEDICT XVI
34
THE HUMANIST CULTURE OF THE INCARNATION
that rock music’s engagement with the body may contradict the incarna-
tional emphasis on the rational Word redeeming the sensual.46
It is difficult to find other such sustained critiques of the rock
music industry in Catholic theological circles, though the non-
Catholic English philosopher Roger Scruton has reached similar
conclusions to Ratzinger in his cultural studies and the Anglican
theologian Catherine Pickstock has written theological analyses
of recent music history which resonate with some of Ratzinger’s
concerns.47 In a lecture delivered in Cambridge on the morality of
pop, Scruton argued that much contemporary pop music arrests
its listeners in a state of adolescent psychological development.
In the essay ‘Youth Culture’s Lament’ he described the pop star
as someone who excites his fans to every kind of artificial ecstasy,
knowing that nothing will change for the fan, that the void will
always remain unfulfilled. In words that could have been written
by Ratzinger he concluded:
35
BENEDICT XVI
36
THE HUMANIST CULTURE OF THE INCARNATION
37
BENEDICT XVI
38
THE HUMANIST CULTURE OF THE INCARNATION
39
BENEDICT XVI
40
THE HUMANIST CULTURE OF THE INCARNATION
41
BENEDICT XVI
42
THE HUMANIST CULTURE OF THE INCARNATION
43
BENEDICT XVI
44
THE HUMANIST CULTURE OF THE INCARNATION
45
BENEDICT XVI
The Magi of the Gospel are but the first in a vast pilgrimage in
which the beauty of this earth is laid at the feet of Christ: the gold
of the ancient Christian mosaics, the multi-coloured light from
the windows of our great cathedrals, the praise of their stone, the
Christmas songs of the trees of the forest are all inspired by him,
and human voices like musical instruments have found their most
beautiful melodies when they cast themselves at his feet. The
suffering of the world too – its misery – comes to him in order,
for a moment, to find security and understanding in the presence
of the God who is poor.81
46
THE HUMANIST CULTURE OF THE INCARNATION
the intimacy between the Divine and the human, the sacramental
presence of God in the world. As David S Yeago has explained
the theory:
47
CHAPTER 3
48
REVELATION, TRADITION AND HERMENEUTICS
49
BENEDICT XVI
human thought and experience. But, for Thomas, what God reveals
has precisely that quality which Luther sought to recover in his
translation – that is, the intimate self-manifestation, the word
which pours from the heart, and which animates faith.4
50
REVELATION, TRADITION AND HERMENEUTICS
51
BENEDICT XVI
52
REVELATION, TRADITION AND HERMENEUTICS
53
BENEDICT XVI
54
REVELATION, TRADITION AND HERMENEUTICS
The truths that come into new prominence can never contradict
the old, but nevertheless the Spirit can in every age blow where he
will, and in every age can bring to the fore entirely new aspects
of Divine Revelation. What is entirely intolerable is the notion
that the ‘progress of dogma’ gradually narrows down the unex-
plored area of divine truth, continually allowing less and less
space to the free play of thought within the faith, as though ‘pro-
gress’ consisted in first of all establishing the main outlines of the
faith, and then proceeding to the more and more detailed work
required to complete the edifice until finally – shortly before the
Last Judgment, perhaps? – the structure would stand there
complete, consisting in all its aspects of fully ‘used up’ defined
dogma.23
55
BENEDICT XVI
contemplative part of the Church learns more and more about the
revelation contained in Scripture. Scripture contains an infinite
number of ‘seeds’ or interpretations that require time to unfold
them.24
56
REVELATION, TRADITION AND HERMENEUTICS
but on the other hand allows me to hear the message of the text
and not something coming from my own self ? Once the methodo-
logy has picked history to death by its dissection, who can reawaken
it so that it can live and speak to me? Let me put it another way: if
‘hermeneutics’ is ever to become convincing, the inner harmony
between historical analysis and hermeneutical synthesis must be
first found.26
57
BENEDICT XVI
Ratzinger then suggests that the thesis that the word has priority
over the event gives rise to two further pairs of antitheses: ‘the
playing off of word against cult and of eschatology against apo-
calypse’.33 Closely connected to this is the tendency to oppose the
Jewish to the Hellenistic and among those things that Bultmann
considered Hellenistic were the idea of the cosmos, mystical religio-
sity and cultic piety.34 What remains of Christ after he has been
de-Hellenized is a ‘strictly eschatological prophet who at bottom
proclaims no substantive message’.35 Christianity is thereby reduced
to a syncretic mixture of Jewish eschatology, stoic philosophy and
Greek mystery religion:
58
REVELATION, TRADITION AND HERMENEUTICS
The mutual presence to each other of text and readers creates its
own dynamic, for the text exercises an influence and provokes
reactions. It makes a resonant claim that is heard by readers
whether as individuals or as members of a group. The reader is
in any case never an isolated subject. He or she belongs to a
social context and lives within a tradition. Readers come to the
text with their own questions, exercise a certain selectivity, pro-
pose an interpretation and, in the end, are able either to create a
further work or else take initiatives inspired directly from their
reading of Scripture.
59
BENEDICT XVI
60
REVELATION, TRADITION AND HERMENEUTICS
Man cannot get out of himself, but God can get into him. In the
dynamism of his being, man can also transcend himself; he
becomes more like God, and likeness is knowing – we know what
we are, no more and no less. This first idea is paired with a second
one in Gregory: God’s entrance into man has taken historical
form in the Incarnation. The individual human monads are
broken open into the new subject that is the new Adam. God
wounds the soul – the Son is this wound, and by this wound we
are opened up. The new subject, the Adam who finds his unity
in the Church, opens from within to be in contact with the Son,
61
BENEDICT XVI
and so with the triune God himself. Thomas gave these two
ideas a metaphysical turn in the principles of analogy and parti-
cipation. By doing so, he made possible an open philosophy
that is capable of accepting the biblical phenomenon in all of its
radicalism.47
62
REVELATION, TRADITION AND HERMENEUTICS
It is not dialogue with the world that one should expect to find
on the theological agenda, but rather conversion of a world
characterized by the absence of faith and declining values. The
current context, certainly the European context, has alienated
itself to such a degree from the Christian faith that an emphasis
on the Christian alternative as a rupture with the world is the
only approach that can claim legitimacy.51
63
BENEDICT XVI
64
REVELATION, TRADITION AND HERMENEUTICS
65
BENEDICT XVI
66
REVELATION, TRADITION AND HERMENEUTICS
‘the faith in the one God, who has created the whole world through
the Word, does not tolerate the religious appearance of myths, it
rather enlightens the world’.58 It is precisely for this reason that
Balthasar argued that the real battle between religions begins after
the Incarnation. More recently as Benedict XVI, Ratzinger wrote
in paragraph 5 of Spe Salvi:
[Saint Gregory Nazianzus] says that at the very moment when the
Magi, guided by the star, adored Christ the new king, astrology
came to an end, because the stars were now moving in the orbit
determined by Christ. This scene, in fact, overturns the world-view
of that time, which in a different way has become fashionable once
again today. It is not the elemental spirits of the universe, the laws
of matter, which ultimately govern the world and mankind, but a
personal God governs the stars, that is, the universe; it is not the
laws of matter and of evolution that have the final say, but reason,
will, love – a Person. And if we know this Person and he knows us,
then truly the inexorable power of material elements no longer has
the last word; we are not slaves of the universe and of its laws, we
are free. In ancient times, honest enquiring minds were aware of
this. Heaven is not empty. Life is not a simple product of laws and
the randomness of matter, but within everything and at the same
time above everything, there is a personal will, there is a Spirit
who in Jesus has revealed himself as Love.
The reference here to the Holy Spirit is significant. If one asks the
question of Möhler and Newman about how they can be certain the
faith of a nineteenth-century Bavarian is the same as a first-century
Roman the role of the Holy Spirit becomes a central factor. As
Balthasar noted the ‘task of making the historical existence of Christ
the norm of every individual existence is the work of the Holy Spirit.
The Holy Spirit does not issue a further revelation, he exposes the
full depth of what has been completed, giving it a total relevance
for every moment in history’.59
Such an account of the work of the Holy Spirit is contained in
paragraph 7 of the Conciliar document Lumen Gentium: ‘In order
that we might be unceasingly renewed in Him [cf. Eph. 4:23], He has
shared with us His Spirit who, existing as one and the same being in
the Head and in the members, gives life to, unifies and moves through
the whole body’. The theme is also strong in the Pauline scriptures.
67
BENEDICT XVI
As Ormond Rush explains in his essay ‘The Holy Spirit and Revela-
tion’, for St Paul, the understanding of the Gospel and the event of
preaching, including the hearing that leads to faith, are all the work
of the Holy Spirit:
[In First Corinthians], Paul affirms the revelatory role of the Spirit
who knows the depths of God, and, because believers are taught
by the Spirit, they now have the mind of Christ, enabling them to
understand the gifts of God . . . Paul also witnesses to the graced
quality of his re-reading of the Jewish Scriptures; it is the Holy
Spirit who enables him to properly interpret them. He believes
that his proclamation of the Gospel is a divinely-assisted inter-
pretation of the tradition. For example, in 2 Cor. 3:12–18, he
writes of understanding the reading of Scripture in the light of
Christ, and of the Spirit’s role in removing the veil that would
prevent proper interpretation. Paul is here naming the Christian
experience of the Holy Spirit as the source of the capacity to
interpret the new in terms of the old, and the old in terms of
the new.60
68
REVELATION, TRADITION AND HERMENEUTICS
69
BENEDICT XVI
70
CHAPTER 4
71
BENEDICT XVI
and his second encyclical Spe Salvi dealt with the relationship
between faith and hope. The first half of Deus Caritas Est built upon
Guardini’s theme that Christianity is primarily about a personal
relationship with the Trinity and Balthasar’s theme, expressed most
strongly in Love Alone is Credible, that it is the reality of love rather
than clever dialectics that will ultimately convince ‘modern man’ of
the truth of Revelation. Motifs which appear in Spe Salvi were also
foreshadowed in Ratzinger’s earlier academic works including: Faith
and the Future (1971), The Theology of History in St Bonaventure
(written as an Habilitationsschrift in the 1950s and published in an
English translation in 1971), Principles of Catholic Theology (1982);
Politik und Erlösung (1986); Spiritual Exercises in Faith, Hope and
Love: The Yes of Jesus Christ (1991); and The End of Time? (2004) –
a paper delivered at a meeting with Johann Baptist Metz, Jürgen
Moltmann and Eveline Goodman-Thau.1 In the shadows behind
many of these publications there stands the influence of Josef
Pieper’s works on Glaube, Hoffnung and Liebe published together
with a translation in English in 1997 and his Über das Ende der Zeit
published in an English translation in 1999.2 Behind Pieper there
stands the works of Paschasius Radbertus (c.790–865) – a Frankish
theologian of the Carolingian era, as well as critiques of despair
and presumption and the spiritual malady of acedia in the moral
theology of Augustine and Aquinas. To these Ratzinger adds reflec-
tions on hope from St Bonaventure’s Advent Sermons and insights
from more contemporary, predominately Marxist authors, such
as Ernst Bloch (1885–1977), Max Horkheimer (1895–1973) and
Theodor Adorno (1903–1969) of the Institut für Sozialforschung,
known colloquially as the Frankfurt School. The significance of
these non-Christian authors is that they provide insights into post-
Christian analogues for the theological virtue of hope. The third
encyclical, Caritas in Veritate, also builds on the critique of liberal
notions of progress in Spe Salvi, but shifts its application from
eschatology to the intersection of theology with social theory. The
core theological ideas of Caritas in Veritate were all present in
Ratzinger’s essay (published in 1969) on the notion of human dignity
in the Conciliar document Gaudium et Spes and these in turn
reiterate themes in de Lubac’s The Drama of Atheistic Humanism
(1944), specifically the notion that all secular visions of a perfected
humanity are ultimately tragic.
72
THE THEOLOGICAL VIRTUES
73
BENEDICT XVI
74
THE THEOLOGICAL VIRTUES
75
BENEDICT XVI
Grace does not cancel out justice. It does not make wrong
into right. It is not a sponge which wipes everything away, so
that whatever someone has done on earth ends up being of equal
value. Dostoevsky, for example, was right to protest against this
kind of Heaven and this kind of grace in his novel The Brothers
Karamazov. Evildoers, in the end, do not sit at table at the eternal
banquet beside their victims without distinction, as though nothing
had happened.10
This encounter with Him, as it burns us, transforms and frees us,
allowing us to become truly ourselves . . . His gaze, the touch of
his heart heals us through an undeniably painful transformation
‘as through fire’.11
76
THE THEOLOGICAL VIRTUES
77
BENEDICT XVI
Let us ask once again: what may we hope? And what may we not
hope? First of all, we must acknowledge that incremental progress
is possible only in the material sphere. Here, amid our growing
knowledge of the structure of matter and in the light of ever more
advanced inventions, we clearly see continuous progress towards
an ever greater mastery of nature. Yet in the field of ethical aware-
ness and moral decision-making, there is no similar possibility
of accumulation for the simple reason that man’s freedom is
78
THE THEOLOGICAL VIRTUES
79
BENEDICT XVI
80
THE THEOLOGICAL VIRTUES
purification of sight takes place through faith (Acts 15:9) and through
love, at all events not as a result of reflection alone and not at all by
man’s own power’.24 In this Christmas reflection he added a criticism
of Cartesian rationality or what Bernanos has called ‘the logos of
the machine’:
81
BENEDICT XVI
[For those who separate eros and agape] the person’s subjectivity
imposes a meaning on the body which each person technically
manipulates in a way that treats it as a purely physical and exterior
reality. This vision of things is ultimately destructive for authentic
love: It disconnects the spiritual dimension of love, often reduced
to a chaste amorous feeling, from sexuality, which is reduced to
a purely biological function, ceasing to be a sacrament of love.29
82
THE THEOLOGICAL VIRTUES
On the one hand everything is getting better all the time – a new
generation of mobile phones is being released every week. But
in order to make use of it you need to follow new instructions.
83
BENEDICT XVI
84
THE THEOLOGICAL VIRTUES
85
BENEDICT XVI
It will not forget the Logos made flesh as its ‘ratio’ and look for it
within its discourse. It will not hide this light for its certainty, its
reasonableness. Sometimes Church discussion gives the impres-
sion that we could construct a just world through the consensus
of men and women of good will and through common sense.
Doing so would make faith appear as a beautiful ornament, like
an extension on a building – decorative, superfluous. And when
we look deeper, we discover that the assent of reason and good
will is always dubious and obstructed by original sin – not only
does faith tell us this, but experience, too. So we come to the
realization that Revelation is needed also for the Church’s social
directives: the source of our understanding for ‘justice’ thus
becomes the Logos made flesh.44
86
THE THEOLOGICAL VIRTUES
grace and the two ends theory of human nature. Among the latter,
prominent twentieth-century Americans included the Conciliar
peritus, John Courtney Murray, and the ethicist, Germain Grisez.
Schindler has summarized the difference between the political impli-
cations of the accounts of nature and grace represented by de Lubac
and Murray in the following statements:
87
BENEDICT XVI
88
THE THEOLOGICAL VIRTUES
89
BENEDICT XVI
90
THE THEOLOGICAL VIRTUES
91
BENEDICT XVI
92
CHAPTER 5
93
BENEDICT XVI
The impetus for examining the historical end of the pole can be
found at least as far back as Johann Gottfried von Herder (1744–
1803), however it became a driving force in theological speculation in
the twentieth century following the publication of Heidegger’s Being
and Time in 1927. Heidegger had abandoned his Catholic faith in
1919 and in the 1920s he turned to Protestantism, particularly to
Martin Luther’s criticisms of scholastic metaphysics. This was at a
time when neo-scholasticism was the dominant theological tradition
in Catholic academies, in particular in the pontifical academies in
Rome and Belgium. Heidegger was in full rebellion from the anti-
historical spirit of the scholasticism of his youth. While later scholars
would defend Thomas Aquinas and Bonaventure from the charge
of having ignored history, it is generally acknowledged that post-
Tridentine scholasticism prided itself on its rejection of what was
perceived to be a Protestant fixation on history. Rudolf Voderholzer
noted, for example, that Cajetan skipped whole passages in his
commentary on the Summa of St Thomas precisely because they
concerned mere history and so, in Cajetan’s understanding, resisted
systematization and as such were of no interest to him.3 However
what interested the young Heidegger was precisely what he called the
‘hermeneutics of facticity in concrete life’ or being as it is in time,
which became known as an ‘existential analytic’ in Being and Time.
The key categories of this analytic were care and existence, concern
and instrumentality, temporality and historicity.
In the 1920s these categories were appropriated by Rudolf
Bultmann, one of Heidegger’s colleagues in Marburg, and applied
to his deconstruction and demythologization of the Gospels. Later,
in the 1930s, Heidegger’s attention was drawn away from Luther to
the works of Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900) and the poet Friedrich
Hölderlin (1770–1843). Notwithstanding the fact that as Rector
of the University of Freiburg between April 1933 and April 1934
Heidegger had allowed himself to be publicly associated with the
Nazi ideology, during the decade of the 1930s a whole generation of
Catholic scholars were attracted to the study of his philosophy. These
included Max Müller, Gustav Siewerth, Johannes B. Lotz and Karl
Rahner. His impact was such that in 1969 Rahner was to write that
‘Catholic theology can no longer be thought of without Martin
Heidegger, because even those who hope to go beyond him and ask
questions different from his, nonetheless owe their origin to him’.4
He also remarked that although he had had many professors in the
94
HISTORY AND ONTOLOGY AFTER HEIDEGGER
95
BENEDICT XVI
96
HISTORY AND ONTOLOGY AFTER HEIDEGGER
97
BENEDICT XVI
hope for the future. Salvation history is, therefore, not merely the
past, it is also the present and the future, as we continue on our
pilgrimage till the Lord’s return.23
98
HISTORY AND ONTOLOGY AFTER HEIDEGGER
99
BENEDICT XVI
100
HISTORY AND ONTOLOGY AFTER HEIDEGGER
Decisive for the Greek concept of God was the belief in God as a
pure and changeless being of whom, consequently, no action
could be predicated; his utter changelessness meant that he was
completely self-contained and referred wholly to himself without
any relationship to what was changeable. For the biblical God,
on the other hand, it is precisely relationship and action that
are the essential marks; creation and revelation are the two basic
statements about him, and when revelation is fulfilled in the
Resurrection, it is thus confirmed once again that he is not just
one who is timeless but also one who is above time, whose exis-
tence is known to us only through action.36
101
BENEDICT XVI
In the 1970s and most of the 1980s until the collapse of European
Communism in 1989, this approach nurtured the liberation theology
movement since in those decades Marxism was seen by many mem-
bers of the international intellectual elite as the embodiment of
human reason. In his response Ratzinger asked whether it is true
that Christianity adds nothing to the universal but merely makes
it known:
Is the Christian really just man as he is? Does not the whole
dynamism of history stem from the pressure to rise above man as
he is? Is not the main point of the faith of both Testaments that
man is what he ought to be only by conversion, that is, when he
ceases to be what he is? Does not such a concept which turns
being into history but also history into being, result in a vast
stagnation despite the talk of self-transcendence as the content
of man’s being?40
102
HISTORY AND ONTOLOGY AFTER HEIDEGGER
supernatural end right or you will not be able to get his natural or
this worldly end right’.41
Against Rahner’s treatment of the relationship between history
and ontology, Ratzinger suggested that ‘we must comprehend why
God’s universalism (God wants everyone to be saved) makes use of
the particularism of the history of salvation (from Abraham to the
Church)’, and further, that ‘concern for the salvation of others should
not lead to this particularism being as good as completely deleted:
the history of salvation and the history of the world should not be
declared to be simply identical because God’s concern must be
directed at everyone’.42 Moreover, Ratzinger argued that Christianity
does represent a very particular intervention in the history of being
and the being of history since how otherwise could it be such a sign
to be rejected (Lk. 2: 34)?43
Referring to passages in Rahner’s Foundations of Christian Faith:
An Introduction to the Idea of Christianity, Ratzinger concluded that
the real problem with Rahner’s synthesis is that he ‘sought for a phi-
losophical and theological world formula on the basis on which the
whole of reality can be deduced cohesively from necessary causes’.44
Ratzinger believes that at the root of this approach is a concept of
freedom taken from idealistic philosophy, and while he believes that
such a concept is appropriate for an understanding of divine free-
dom, he thinks it does not work for human freedom. He notes that
Rahner defines freedom as the ‘ability to be oneself’ and that it is
nothing less than the ‘the ultimate self-responsibility of the person’.45
He described such a concept of freedom as ‘an almost godlike ability
for self-action’ and suggested that ‘wanting to be like God is the inner
motive of all mankind’s programs of liberation’.46 He also recom-
mended the work of M. Kriele, Befreiung und politische Aufklärung,
for an exposition of the alternative accounts of human freedom on
the intellectual market.47
The specific difference of a Christian conception of freedom was
addressed by Jean Daniélou in his essay, ‘The Conception of History
in the Christian Tradition’. Daniélou wrote:
103
BENEDICT XVI
of sacred history, where the individual inserts himself into the web
of an economy which goes beyond him and which constitutes
an objective plan.48
Man finds his centre of gravity, not inside, but outside himself.
The place to which he is anchored is not, as it were, within himself,
but without. This explains that remnant that remains always to
be explained, the fragmentary character of all his efforts to com-
prehend the unity of history and being. Ultimately, the tension
between ontology and history has its foundation in the tension
within human nature itself, which must go out of itself in order
to find itself; it has its foundation in the mystery of God, which is
freedom and which, therefore, calls each individual by a name that
is known to no other. Thus, the whole is communicated to him in
the particular.49
104
HISTORY AND ONTOLOGY AFTER HEIDEGGER
love and hope grope their way through the darkness: they believe
the incredible; they love that which withdraws itself, abandoning
them; they hope against hope. The darkness with its withdrawal
of all available unity makes them one.50
105
BENEDICT XVI
106
HISTORY AND ONTOLOGY AFTER HEIDEGGER
107
BENEDICT XVI
notions of God, human nature, ethos and religion and the emergence
of counterfeit notions of faith, hope and love, set limits on the intel-
lectual horizons of people at the same time as encouraging social
and institutional practices which require a capacity for vice rather
than virtue and thereby diminish a person’s ability to love. As Bonsor
has expressed the idea in Heideggerian terms, ‘the play of historical
contexts continually opens what can be seen, what can be thought’
and conversely, whatever ‘is said and thought is intrinsically bound
to the opening, to the context which makes it possible’. 57 However,
for Ratzinger, unlike Heidegger, the whole purpose of the Church
as the universal sacrament of salvation is to act as the agent by which
the eternal is mediated to the present. Self-transcendence, including
the transcendence of one’s culture, is made possible by grace given by
a personal God. Some cultures however are more or less hospitable
to the humanism of the Incarnation than others. As de Lubac argued,
no culture is ever theologically neutral.
It is sometimes remarked by those writing from a liberation theo-
logy perspective, that Ratzinger appears closer to the eschatological
end of the spectrum than to the incarnational. This is because of his
scepticism about the possibility of a moral ‘leap forward’ in human
behaviour and organization. He is wary of neo-Pelagian presump-
tions about the perfectibility of human nature through education
and he regarded the terminology in the discussion of freedom in
Gaudium et spes as ‘downright Pelagian’. Education however valuable
it might be in eliminating ignorance, cannot eradicate sin. Nonethe-
less his disposition is never to occupy one extreme end of a theological
spectrum but rather to try and balance the poles in a creative tension.
One might say that his tendency is to think of Good Friday from the
perspective of Easter Sunday and Easter Sunday from the perspec-
tive of Good Friday. In his Introduction to Christianity, he wrote:
108
HISTORY AND ONTOLOGY AFTER HEIDEGGER
109
BENEDICT XVI
110
HISTORY AND ONTOLOGY AFTER HEIDEGGER
111
BENEDICT XVI
112
HISTORY AND ONTOLOGY AFTER HEIDEGGER
113
CHAPTER 6
114
CHRISTIANITY IN THE MARKETPLACE OF FAITH TRADITIONS
gods. Their natural habitat was the theatre which in classical times
was thoroughly religious and cultic in character. According to popular
conviction theatre shows were established in Rome on the orders of
the gods. The content of mystical theology was thus the myths of the
gods. The natural theologians were the philosophers, those who went
beyond the mundane and searched to understand reality as such.
Their natural habitat was in the academies and the content of their
theology focused on the subject of what the gods are made. The
political theologians were those whose natural habitat was found in
the organs of government and the content of their theology covered
cult worship.
From these sets of distinctions Varro concluded that natural theo-
logy deals with the nature of the gods and the remaining theologies
deal with the godly institutions of men. Civil theology does not
ultimately have any god, only religion; while natural theology has
no religion, but only some deity. Moreover, within this triad the order
of worship, the concrete world of religion, does not belong to the
order of reality as such, but to the order of mores, or customs. The
gods did not create the state, rather the state instituted its own gods,
and their worship is important to the state in order to maintain the
good conduct of its citizens. According to this view, religion is essen-
tially a political phenomenon or what today would be called an
ideology. Ratzinger noted that within this triad of theological types,
Augustine placed Christianity in the realm of physical or natural
theology. Christianity therefore has its antecedents in philosophical
rationality, not in mythical cults which have their ultimate justifi-
cation in their political usefulness.
From this foundation Ratzinger concluded that precisely because
Christianity understood itself as the triumph of knowledge over
myth, it had to consider itself universal – ‘it had to be taken forth to
all peoples not as a specific religion elbowing its way among others,
not through any sort of religious imperialism, but as truth which
makes illusion superfluous’.1 Since it did not concur with the relati-
vity and changeability of the civic gods it frustrated the political
usefulness of religion and as a result its adherents were subjected to
successive waves of persecutions by Roman emperors.
Nonetheless, while Ratzinger, following Augustine, classified Chris-
tianity under the banner of a natural religion, he observed that with
Christianity there is a profound modification of the philosophical
image of God: the God in whom the Christians believe is truly a
115
BENEDICT XVI
natural God, in contrast to the mythic and political gods; but not
everything which is nature, is God. God is God by his nature, but
nature as such is not God. There is a certain separation between
all embracing nature and the Being which affords it its origin and
beginning. Further, this God is not a silent God. This God entered
human history.
According to Ratzinger’s reading of history, Christianity was
convincing precisely because it joined faith and reason and because
it directed action to caritas, to charity – the moral practices which
were a part of the Christian package placed an accent on the loving
care of the suffering, the poor and the weak:
116
CHRISTIANITY IN THE MARKETPLACE OF FAITH TRADITIONS
117
BENEDICT XVI
term, nor is there any ‘soul of the world’ or interior dynamic in the
classical Stoic sense.
While accepting that there are micro-evolutionary processes at
work, Ratzinger believes that the world was created in time by God
and that Christians cannot surrender this principle if Christianity
is not to mutate into some kind of Gnosticism. He believes that all
the monotheistic traditions share this basic belief that the world was
created by God according to his own principles, giving the natural
order an internal coherence and beauty. In a series of essays pub-
lished in 1995 under the title of A Catholic Understanding of the Fall
and Creation he wrote:
I see the common core of Gnosticism, in all its different forms and
versions, as the repudiation of creation. This common core has a
common effect on the doctrine of humankind to be found in the
various models of Gnosticism: the mystery of suffering, of love,
of substitutionary redemption, is rejected in favour of a control
of the world and of life through knowledge. Love appears too
insecure a foundation for life . . . It means one has to depend on
something unpredictable and unenforceable, something we cannot
certainly make ourselves, but can only wait and receive . . . instead
of being a beautiful promise, love becomes an unbearable feeling
of dependence, of subjection . . . In the Gnostic view of the world,
whether ancient or modern, creation appears as dependence, and
God as the reason for dependence . . . [this is] the reason why
Gnosticism can never be neutral in matters concerning God, but
rather aggressively anti-theistic . . . .Gnosticism will not entrust
itself to a world already created, but only to a world still to be
created.9
118
CHRISTIANITY IN THE MARKETPLACE OF FAITH TRADITIONS
love is real reason. In their unity, they are the real basis and goal
of all reality.10
119
BENEDICT XVI
120
CHRISTIANITY IN THE MARKETPLACE OF FAITH TRADITIONS
121
BENEDICT XVI
Guardini went on to say that if one tries to mute this personal and
historical side, ‘then all depth of thought, all intellectual keenness,
all ecstasy that you may have is nothing’ since one will have
‘dissolved Christ’.20
In his own genealogy of the destruction of the classical-theistic
synthesis of faith and reason Ratzinger agrees with the view that
all roads to modernity run through the Kantian intersection, but
he is also interested in the side-road of the Italian philosopher
Giambattista Vico (1668–1744). Against the Scholastic equation
verum est ens (being is truth), Vico advanced a new formula,
verum quia factum (the true is what we make).21 Vico thereby
introduced the problematic of the relationship between being
and history. Ratzinger notes that through Hegel and Comte being
itself came to be understood as an historical process. Marx then
gave economics an historical slant and Darwin gave biology an
historical slant. With F. C. Baur theology turned into history.22
By the end of the twentieth century Ratzinger suggests that Vico’s
verum quia factum had been replaced with verum quia faciendum
with the result that the truth with which we are now concerned
is feasibility. The dominance of history is being replaced by the
dominance of techne.23
This theme is treated in the series of essays Ratzinger published
as Values in a Time of Upheaval. In these he traced the transition
from mutations in the concept of God in the eighteenth century
(from God the Creator to god the mechanic) to a ‘second Enlighten-
ment’ which renders all conceptions of God and even of Marxist
eschatology and epistemology obsolete. It takes as its criterion of
rationality the experience of technological production based on
science. This more contemporary conceptual mutation markets
itself under the label of a ‘new world order’. Ratzinger observes
that proponents of this concept share with Marxism ‘the evolu-
tionistic idea that the world we encounter is the product of irrational
chance’ and ‘cannot bear any ethical directives in itself as the old
idea of nature envisaged’.24 The principles of this new order are
therefore not derived from considerations of what is according to
nature but from the dreams of scientific and entrepreneurial elites
who represent a new ruling class and bring with them new forms
of coercion. The greatest scope for their operation lies in the fields
of biotechnology. Human life becomes a product and hope is
122
CHRISTIANITY IN THE MARKETPLACE OF FAITH TRADITIONS
123
BENEDICT XVI
Such unity of the Christian attitude of faith, hope and love is the
ultimate basis of Christian understanding or knowledge whose
nearest analogy is the knowledge of a beloved human being . . .
The mediator of such understanding in love is the Holy Spirit
which, as the ‘Spirit of Childhood’ encourages two attitudes. The
first is the immediate, open approach to all the treasures and
secrets of God; the second is the childlike spirit which does not
presume to take what does not belong to it.26
124
CHRISTIANITY IN THE MARKETPLACE OF FAITH TRADITIONS
into the realm of Him who is the logos, the reason, and the reason-
able ground of all being, all things, and all mankind’.29 Thus
‘Man can rethink the logos, the meaning of being, because his
own logos, his own reason, is logos of the one logos, thought of the
original thought, of the creative spirit that permeates and governs
his being’.30
The model of reason members of Western cultures have received
from the eighteenth century, especially from Kant, cannot, however,
accommodate the structure of the faith by such an expansion of the
range of reason. Like MacIntyre, Ratzinger believes that there are
different rationalities associated with different theological traditions
and thus that some theological frameworks may be more or less
open to fostering the expansion of reason’s range. He has also stated
that he prefers the epistemology of St Augustine because Augustine
‘is well aware that the organ by which God can be seen cannot be a
non-historical “ratio naturalis” [natural reason] but only the ratio
pura, that is, purificata [purified reason] or, as Augustine expresses it
echoing the Gospel, the cor purum [pure heart]’.31 Belief in the sense
intended by the Creed is not an incomplete kind of knowledge, an
opinion that subsequently can or should be converted into practical
knowledge. It is rather an essentially different kind of intellectual
attitude, which stands alongside practical knowledge as something
independent and particular and cannot be traced back to it or
deduced from it.32 Ratzinger is also of the opinion that ‘neo-Scholastic
rationalism failed in its attempts to reconstruct the “preambula fidei”
with wholly independent reasoning, with pure rational certainty’.33
Karl Barth, he says, was ‘right to reject philosophy as the foundation
of faith independent of faith’, since if that were so, ‘our faith would
be based from the beginning to the end, on the changing philosophi-
cal theories’.34 Nonetheless, he believes that Barth was wrong to
propose faith as a pure paradox that can only exist against reason
and totally independent of it. For Ratzinger faith and reason need
one another and their relationship is an intrinsic one: ‘Reason will
not be saved without the faith, but the faith without reason will
not be human’.35
In his Introduction to Christianity, Ratzinger wrote that ‘the
Christian corrects philosophy and lets it know that love is higher
than mere thought’.36 With the arrival of Christianity, purely philo-
sophical thinking was transcended on two fundamental points:
whereas the philosophical God is essentially self-centred, thought
125
BENEDICT XVI
126
CHRISTIANITY IN THE MARKETPLACE OF FAITH TRADITIONS
127
BENEDICT XVI
128
CHAPTER 7
129
BENEDICT XVI
130
THE VISION OF UNITY
131
BENEDICT XVI
132
THE VISION OF UNITY
133
BENEDICT XVI
to the Hebrews and the Gospel of John (in Jesus’ high-priestly prayer)
go beyond the traditional link between the Last Supper and the Pasch
and see the Eucharist in connection with the Day of Atonement’.26
One might say that just as Ratzinger likes to employ a hermeneutic
of continuity in his presentation of the Church’s teaching before and
after the Second Vatican Council, he likes to emphasize an analogous
hermeneutic of continuity between the Old and New Testaments, in
which the New Testament is the fulfilment, not the abrogation, of
the Old Testament. This theme is strong in paragraph 1968 of The
Catechism of the Catholic Church which Ratzinger helped to draft:
134
THE VISION OF UNITY
Jews are thus the ‘older brothers’ of Christians and this expression
of solidarity is one which has been well received in Jewish quarters.
In 2008 when Ratzinger invited Shear-Yashuv Cohen, Head Rabbi of
Haifa, to address the Synod on the Word, the Rabbi gave a positive
response to the invitation and in this he stated that the policy and
doctrine of describing the Jewish people as G-d’s Chosen People and
the Older Brothers of Christians is something deeply appreciated.
Ratzinger frequently uses this older sibling language and emphasizes
that together Christians and Jews can offer a shared witness to the
One God and his commandments, the sanctity of life and the promo-
tion of human dignity and the rights of the family.32 Thus, in his 2009
Address to the two chief Rabbis of Jerusalem, Ratzinger reiterated
his commitment to the path chosen at the Second Vatican Council
for a ‘genuine and lasting reconciliation between Christians and
Jews’ which ‘continues to value the spiritual patrimony common to
Christians and Jews and desires an ever deeper mutual understanding
135
BENEDICT XVI
The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems. They adore
the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and
all-powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth, who has spoken
to men; they take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even His
inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham, with whom the faith of
Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God. Though
they do not acknowledge Jesus as God, they revere Him as a
prophet. They also honor Mary, His virgin Mother; at times they
even call on her with devotion. In addition, they await the Day
of Judgment when God will render their deserts to all those who
have been raised up from the dead. Finally, they value the moral
life and worship God especially through prayer, almsgiving and
fasting.
136
THE VISION OF UNITY
137
BENEDICT XVI
planned long before the Regensburg Address and the main intention
was for the pope to participate in the annual St Andrew’s Day delega-
tion of the Holy See to the Fanar. The basic message of this visit
was papal support for those Muslims and Christians who live in a
political culture deeply ingrained with secularist ideologies and
opposed to any religious expression in the public square. In a meeting
with members of the Diplomatic Corps to the Republic of Turkey
Benedict XVI remarked that ‘Christians and Muslims, following
their respective religions, point to the truth of the sacred character
and dignity of the person’.35 Like many world leaders Ratzinger makes
a distinction between violent religious fanatics and pious people of
good will, and implores members of the Islamic world not to follow
those who fit into the first category.
In summary one might argue that when addressing members of
the Islamic tradition he makes appeals to reason and to a common
belief that human beings have been created by God, when addressing
members of the Jewish tradition he appeals to common theological
elements in the Jewish and Christian traditions such as atonement,
sacrifice, priesthood and covenant and when confronted with the
various versions of the ‘praxis project’ he makes MacIntyresque noises
about how notions like justice are themselves tradition-dependent
and Milbank-sympathetic observations about how eighteenth-century
Western liberal philosophical presuppositions lie dormant at their
foundations.
When one moves from inter-faith dialogue to ecumenical dialogue
Ratzinger tends to emphasize the primacy of prayer for unity and
the path of ‘spiritual ecumenism’ – a theme which was prominent in
John Paul II’s encyclical Ut Unum Sint (1995). For example in his
Letter to the Participants in the Third European Ecumenical Assembly
he wrote that ‘two elements must guide us in our commitment: the
dialogue of truth and the encounter in the sign of brotherhood.
Both need spiritual ecumenism as their foundation’.36 Similarly, in his
Catechesis on the Work of Prayer for Christian Unity, he wrote that
common prayer is what ‘distinguishes the ecumenical movement
from any other initiative of dialogue and relations with other reli-
gions and ideologies’.37 On the occasion of the Feast of Saint Henrik
he even described the joint prayer of Lutheran and Catholic Finns as
‘the royal door of ecumenism’, which ‘reinforces our bonds of com-
munion; and enables us to face courageously the painful memories,
138
THE VISION OF UNITY
social burdens and human weaknesses that are so much a part of our
divisions’.38 Since grace is the most effective healer of the wounds
of the eleventh and sixteenth centuries, prayer is the primary element
of ecumenical efforts.
Ratzinger’s most significant ecumenical achievement as a Cardinal
was to be instrumental in saving the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine
of Justification with the Lutheran World Federation (which the
Methodist World Council has now also signed as its own confession
of faith on this matter). Bishop George Anderson, head of the Evan-
gelical Lutheran Church of America, publicly acknowledged that it
was ‘Ratzinger who untied the knots’ when it looked as though the
document would be shipwrecked by officials from the Pontifical
Council for the Promotion of Christian Unity. Ratzinger got the
agreement back on track by organizing a meeting with the Lutheran
leaders at his brother Georg’s house in Regensburg. It is said that at
that meeting Ratzinger made three concessions that salvaged the
agreement. First, he agreed that the goal of the ecumenical process is
unity in diversity, not structural reintegration. Secondly, he acknowl-
edged the authority of the Lutheran World Federation to reach
agreement with the Vatican (this was something which the Pontifical
Council for the Promotion of Christian Unity had questioned).
Thirdly, Ratzinger agreed that while Christians are obliged to do
good works, justification and final judgment remain God’s gracious
acts. The actual wording of the key sentence of the declaration is:
‘By grace alone, in faith in Christ’s saving work and not because
of any merit on our part, we are accepted by God and receive the
Holy Spirit, who renews our hearts while equipping us and calling
us to do good works’.39
Consistent with his first concession above, that the ecumenical
process is one of acquiring unity in diversity, not structural reintegra-
tion, in his Ecumenical Meeting Address during World Youth Day
at Cologne Ratzinger remarked that ‘Ecumenism does not mean
what could be called ecumenism of the return: that is, to deny and to
reject one’s own faith history – it does not mean uniformity in all
expressions of theology and spirituality, in liturgical forms and in
discipline’.40 In this address he also spoke of dialogue as an exchange
of gifts in which the Churches and Ecclesial Communities can make
available their own riches. This theme was reiterated in a parallel
address in the Crypt of St Mary’s Cathedral in Sydney, at the Second
139
BENEDICT XVI
It is the hope of the Holy Father, Pope Benedict XVI, that the
Anglican clergy and faithful who desire union with the Catholic
Church will find in this ecumenical structure the opportunity to
preserve those Anglican traditions precious to them and consis-
tent with the Catholic faith. Insofar as these traditions express in
a distinctive way the faith that is held in common, they are a gift
to be shared in the wider Church. The unity of the Church does
not require a uniformity that ignores cultural diversity, as the
history of Christianity shows.41
140
THE VISION OF UNITY
141
BENEDICT XVI
142
THE VISION OF UNITY
ecclesial model was juridical, Johann Adam Möhler in his Die Einheit
in der Kirche oder das Princip des Katholicismus (1825) described the
Church as a community whose growth is conditioned by the presence
of the Holy Spirit.50 Murphy writes:
143
BENEDICT XVI
144
THE VISION OF UNITY
145
BENEDICT XVI
146
THE VISION OF UNITY
On that account [the notion that the Eucharist makes the Church],
the local churches have the whole reality of the Church, not merely
a parcel of the whole. On the other hand, the fresh discovery that
Christ can exist only as a whole must not lead us to forget the
complementary truth that he can only be one and that we accord-
ingly possess him in his entirety only when we possess him together
with others, when we possess him in unity. The unity of the uni-
versal Church is in this sense an inner moment of the local church,
just as the multiplicity and inherent dignity of the local churches
is an essential component of ecclesiastical unity.62
147
BENEDICT XVI
148
THE VISION OF UNITY
149
BENEDICT XVI
150
THE VISION OF UNITY
151
CONCLUSION
152
CONCLUSION
153
BENEDICT XVI
154
CONCLUSION
155
BENEDICT XVI
156
CONCLUSION
157
BENEDICT XVI
158
CONCLUSION
159
BENEDICT XVI
160
NOTES
INTRODUCTION
1 Joseph Ratzinger, Salt of the Earth: The Church at the End of the
Millennium an Interview with Peter Seewald (San Francisco: Ignatius,
1997), p. 66.
2 C. E. Olsen, Interview with Fr D. Vincent Twomey, Ignatius Insight,
7 June; ignatiusinsight.com/features2007/vtwomey_interview_jun07.sp
3 Joseph Ratzinger, Principles of Catholic Theology: Building Stones for a
Fundamental Theology (San Francisco: Ignatius, 1987), p. 158.
4 Fergus Kerr, Twentieth-Century Catholic Theologians (Oxford: Blackwell,
2007).
5 T. F. O’Meara, Church and Culture: German Catholic Theology, 1860–
1914 (Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1991), p. 50.
6 Jean
. Daniélou, ‘Les orientations présentes de la Pensée religieuse’,
Etudes 249 (1946), p. 14. For a short essay on the debates and personali-
ties of this period, see: Aidan Nichols, Beyond the Blue Glass: Catholic
Essays on Faith and Culture (London: Saint Austin Press, 2002): 33–53.
7 Joseph Ratzinger, Salt of the Earth; p. 61.
8 G. Valente, and P. Azzardo, ‘Interview with Alfred Läpple’, 30 Days,
1 (2006), p. 60.
9 Ibid. p. 60.
10 Joseph Ratzinger, Milestones: Memoirs 1927–1977 (San Francisco:
Ignatius, 1998), p. 44.
11 Ibid. pp. 42 & 43. Note in this publication Haecker was written with
an umlaut over the “a”, but Haecker himself used the “ae” rather than
“ä”. Both styles of spelling are found in the literature.
12 For an account of the formation of Communio which includes direct
quotations from Ratzinger see: M. Bardazzi, In the Vineyard of the Lord:
the Life, Faith, and Teachings of Joseph Ratzinger/Pope Benedict XVI
(New York: Rizzoli, 2005), pp. 50–55.
13 George Weigel, God’s Choice: Pope Benedict XVI and the Future of the
Catholic Church (New York: Harper Collins, 2005), p. 178.
14 Joseph Ratzinger, Introduction to Christianity (San Francisco: Ignatius,
2004), p. 11.
15 Ibid. p. 11.
16 Ibid. p. 11.
17 E. Michael Jones, Living Machines (San Francisco: Ignatius, 1995).
161
NOTES
CHAPTER 1
1 H. G. Schenk, The Mind of the European Romantics (Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 1979), p. xviii.
2 In this context it is interesting to note that arguably the country in which
Aeterni Patris has had the greatest long-term popularity is the US, and
which, as John Milbank has noted, ‘in a sense never had a 19th century –
never had historicism and the cult of society and culture and socialist
popularism’. See; John Milbank, ‘The Gift of Ruling: Secularization and
Political Authority’, The Dominican Council, 2004: 212–38 at 235.
3 For histories of the Catholic Faculty of Theology at Tübingen see:
J. R. Geiselmann, Die Katholische Tübinger Schule. Ihre theologische
Eigenart (Freiburg, 1964) and Reinhardt, R, (ed.); Tübinger Theologen und
ihre Theologie. Quellen und Forschungen zur Geschichte der Katholisch-
theologischen Fakultät Tübingen; Contubernium, Beiträge zur Geschichte
der Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen 16. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr,
1977; and D. D. Dietrich and M. J. Haines (eds), The Legacy of the
Tübingen School: The Relevance of Nineteenth-Century Theology for the
Twenty-First Century (New York: Crossroad, 1997).
4 Grant Kaplan, Answering the Enlightenment: The Catholic Recovery of
Historical Revelation (New York: Herder and Herder, 2006), p. 80.
5 J. S. Drey, ‘Aphorismen über den Ursprung unserer Erkenntnisse
vonGott – ein Beitrag zur Entscheidung der neuesten Streitigkeiten über
den Begriff der Offenbarung’, Die theologische Quartalschrift 8 (1826):
237–84. Quoted by Grant Kaplan, Answering the Enlightenment, p. 107.
6 J. E. Kuhn, ‘Über den Begriff und das Wesen der speculativen Theologie
oder christlichen Philosophie’, Die theologische Quartalschrift 14 (1832)
411 f. Quoted in T. F. O’Meara, Romantic Idealism and Roman Catho-
licism: Schelling and the Theologians (Indiana: University of Notre Dame
Press, 1982), p. 154.
7 Grant Kaplan, Answering the Enlightenment, p. 104.
8 Joseph Ratzinger, The Church, Ecumenism and Politics (New York:
Crossroad, 1988), p. 4.
162
NOTES
163
NOTES
27 Joseph Ratzinger, Salt of the Earth: The Church at the End of the
Millennium. An Interview with Peter Seewald (San Francisco: Ignatius,
1997), p. 61.
28 For example, see Karol Wojtyła, Person and Community: Selected
Essays, Theresa Sandok (trans.) (New York: Peter Lang, 1993) and
M. A. Krapiec, I-Man: An Outline of Philosophical Anthropology (New
Britain, CT: Mariel Publications, 1983).
29 Hans Urs von Balthasar, Martin Buber and Christianity: A Dialogue
between Israel and the Church (London: Harvill Press, 1960), pp. 34–5.
30 For an entire work which compares the theme of relationality in the
works of Buber and Ratzinger see: M. Rutsche, Die Relationalität Gottes
bei Martin Buber und Joseph Ratzinger (Munich: Grin Verlag, 2008).
31 Joseph Ratzinger, ‘Concerning the Notion of the Person in Theology’,
Communio: International Catholic Review 17 (3) (1990): 439–54.
32 E. C. Kopff, Introduction to Josef Pieper, Überlieferung: Begriff und
Anspruch (Munich: Kösel, 1970) and the English version Tradition:
Concept and Claim (Wilmington: ISI Books, 2008), p. xxiv.
33 Josef Pieper, No One Could Have Known: An Autobiography: the Early
Years 1904–1945 (San Francisco, 1987), p. 46, as quoted in E. C. Koppf’s
introduction to Tradition: Concept and Claim, p. xxiv.
34 E. C. Koppf, Introduction to Josef Pieper, p. xxv.
35 Josef Pieper, Scholasticism (New York: 1960), p. 126.
36 Joseph Ratzinger, The Yes of Jesus Christ: Spiritual Exercises in Faith,
Hope and Love (New York: Crossroad: 1991).
37 Joseph Ratzinger, On the Way to Jesus Christ (San Francisco: Ignatius,
2005), p. 37.
38 Josef Pieper, Tradition: Concept and Claim, p. 44.
39 Ibid. p. 44.
40 Joseph Ratzinger, Introduction to Christianity (San Francisco: Ignatius,
1990), p. 27.
41 R. A. Krieg, Romano Guardini: the Precursor of Vatican II (Indiana:
University of Notre Dame Press, 1997)
42 V. Consemius, ‘The Condemnation of Modernism and the Survival
of Catholic Theology’, in Gregory Baum (ed.); The Twentieth Century:
A Theological Overview (London: Continuum, 1999), p. 21.
43 Joseph Ratzinger, The Spirit of the Liturgy (San Francisco, Ignatius,
2000), p. 8.
44 Ibid. p. 7.
45 Joseph Ratzinger, ‘Guardini on Christ in our Century’, Crisis Magazine,
(June, 1996): 14–15 at p. 14.
46 Ibid. p. 15.
47 Joseph Ratzinger, Perché siamo ancora nella Chiesa,(Rome: Rizzoli,
2008), p. 261.
48 Hans Urs von Balthasar, Romano Guardini: Reform aus dem Ursprung
(München: Kösel-Verlag, 1970).
49 Hans Urs von Balthasar, Prüfet alles – das Gute behaltet (Ostfildern:
Schwabenverlag, 1986), p. 9.
50 Ibid. p. 9.
164
NOTES
CHAPTER 2
1 Erich Przywara, Weg zu Gott (Einsiedeln: Johannes Verlag, 1962), p. 502.
2 James Cardinal Stafford, ‘Knights of Columbus-States Dinner Keynote
Address”, Washington DC, 3 Aug. 2004.
3 Joseph Ratzinger, On the Way to Jesus Christ (San Francisco: Ignatius,
2005), p. 45.
165
NOTES
4 Hans Urs von Balthasar, Das Ganze in Fragment. Aspekte der Geschich-
testheologie (Einsiedeln, 199), p. 198f as quoted in John Saward,
‘Chesterton and Balthasar: the Likeness is Greater’, Chesterton Review,
Vol. XXII, No. 3, Aug. 1996, p. 314. The author is indebted to Karl
Schmude for this reference.
5 Joseph Ratzinger, On the Way to Jesus Christ, p. 44.
6 Ratzinger, ‘Christ, Faith and the Challenge of Cultures’, Address to
the Presidents of the Asian Bishops’ Conference, 2–5 March 1993.
www.ewtn.com/library/CURIA/RATZHONG.HTM.
7 Ibid.
8 Ibid.
9 Ibid.
10 Joseph Ratzinger, Co-Workers of the Truth: Meditations for Every Day
of the Year (San Francisco: Ignatius, 1992), pp. 18–19.
11 Aidan Nichols, Say It is Pentecost (Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 2001), p. 3.
12 International Theological Commission, ‘Faith and Inculturation’,
Origins 18 (1989): 800–7.
13 Aidan Nichols, Say It is Pentecost, p. 3.
14 Joseph Ratzinger, J The Spirit of the Liturgy (San Francisco: Ignatius,
2000), p. 124.
15 Ibid. p. 124.
16 Joseph Ratzinger, The Ratzinger Report: An Interview with Vittorio
Messori (San Francisco: Ignatius, 1985), p. 130.
17 Ibid. p. 129.
18 Joseph Ratzinger, Message to Comunione e Liberazione, August 2002,
Rimini, Italy – published in Adoremus, Oct. 2006 Vol. XII, No. 7, p. 1.
19 L’Osservatore Romano, 16, No. 6, (1986), pp. 10ff.
20 Josef Pieper, Darstellung und Interpretationem: Platon, Vol. I, ed. B. Wald
(Hamburg, 2002).
21 Joseph Ratzinger, The Spirit of the Liturgy, pp. 126–7.
22 Joseph Ratzinger, On the Way to Jesus Christ, p. 35.
23 Ibid. p. 36.
24 Ibid. p. 36.
25 Ibid. p. 37.
26 Joseph Ratzinger, ‘Art, Image and Artists’, Adoremus Bulletin; Vol. Viii
(1) Mar. 2002, p. 1.
27 Joseph Ratzinger, The Spirit of the Liturgy, p. 129.
28 Ibid. p. 129.
29 Joseph Ratzinger, On the Way to Jesus Christ, p. 40.
30 Joseph Ratzinger, The Spirit of the Liturgy, pp. 132–3.
31 Joseph Ratzinger, On the Way to Jesus Christ, pp. 32–3.
32 C. M. Johansson, Music and Ministry: A Biblical Counterpoint (Peabody,
MA: Hendrickson, 1998).
33 Ibid. p. 55.
34 Ibid. p. 5.
35 H. J. Burbach, ‘Sacro-pop’, Internationale katholische Zeitschrift,
3:148–57 (1974).
166
NOTES
167
NOTES
CHAPTER 3
1 Joseph Ratzinger, ‘Commentary on the Dogmatic Constitution on Divine
Revelation: Origin and Background’, in Herbert Vorgrimler (ed.), Com-
mentary on the Documents of Vatican II, Vol. III (New York: Herder and
Herder, 1969) pp. 155–272.
2 Casarella, P, Introduction to the 2000 edition of Scripture in the Tradition
(New York: Herder and Herder, 2000), p. xvi.
3 John Montag, ‘The False Legacy of Suárez’, in John Milbank , Catherine
Pickstock and Graham Ward (eds) Radical Orthodoxy (London: Rout-
ledge, 1999) pp. 38–64.
4 Ibid. p. 57.
168
NOTES
169
NOTES
31 Ibid. p. 20.
32 Joseph Ratzinger, ‘Biblical Interpretation in Crisis: On the Question of
the Foundations and Approaches of Exegesis Today’ in Jose Granados,
Carlos Granados and Luis Sanchez (eds), Opening Up the Scriptures:
Joseph Ratzinger and the Foundations of Biblical Interpretation, (Grand
Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2008), p. 11.
Note this particular essay of Ratzinger’s has been published in English
twice, first in the work edited by Neuhaus, and secondly in the work
edited by Granados. The translations are different, so that while they
remain the same in substance, the precise words used vary.
33 Ibid. p. 14.
34 Ibid. p. 14.
35 Ibid. p. 15.
36 Ibid. p. 16.
37 Ibid. p. 19.
38 International Theological Commission: ‘Memory and Reconciliation:
the Church and the Faults of the Past’, The Pope Speaks 45, 4, (2000)
208–49 at p. 224.
39 See for example: Alasdair MacIntyre, ‘Some Enlightenment Projects
Reconsidered’, in R. Kearney and M. Dooley (eds), Questioning Ethics:
Contemporary Debates in Philosophy, (London: Routledge, 1998)
pp. 245–58 at p. 250.
40 Kevin J. Vanhoozer, ‘Scripture and Tradition’ in The Cambridge
Companion to Postmodern Theology (Cambridge University Press: 2003),
pp. 152–3.
41 Joseph Ratzinger, ‘Biblical Interpretation in Crisis’ in Jose Grenados,
Carlos Granados and Luis Sanchez (eds), p. 29.
42 Joseph Ratzinger, footnote 25 of ‘Biblical Interpretation in Crisis’
in Richard John Neuhaus (ed.), Biblical Interpretation in Crisis: The
Ratzinger Conference on Bible and Church, p. 18.
43 Romano, Guardini, ‘Heilige Schrift und Glaubenswissenschaft’, Die
Schildgenossen 8 (1928) 24–57.
44 Joseph Ratzinger, ‘Guardini on Christ in our Century’, Crisis Magazine,
(June 1996) 14–16 at p. 15.
45 Hans Urs von Balthasar, Explorations in Theology Vol. I: The Word
Made Flesh (San Francisco: Ignatius, 1989), p. 21.
46 Kevin J. Vanhoozer, ‘Scripture and Tradition’ , p. 165.
47 Joseph Ratzinger, Biblical Interpretation in Crisis’, in J. Granados, Carlos
Granados and Luis Sanchez (eds), p. 23.
48 Lieven Boeve, Interrupting Tradition: An Essay on Christian Faith in a
Postmodern Context (Louvain: Peeters Press, 2003), p. 24.
49 Ibid. p. 35.
50 Ibid. p. 49.
51 Lieven Boeve, God Interrupts History: Theology in a Time of Upheaval
(London: Continuum, 2007), p. 6.
52 Joseph Ratzinger, ‘Interreligious Dialogue and Jewish-Christian
Relations’, Communio: International Catholic Review, 25, (1998) 29–41
at p. 31.
170
NOTES
CHAPTER 4
1 See also: Joseph Ratzinger, ‘Eschatology and Utopia’, Communio: Inter-
national Catholic Review, 5 (1978) 211–27; ‘Vorfragen zu einer Theologie
der Erlösung’ in L. Scheffczyk, (ed.), Erlösung und Emanzipation (Munich,
1982) pp. 167–79; ‘Gottes Kraft – unsere Hoffnung’ in Klerusblatt 67
(1987) 342–47; ‘On Hope’ Communio: International Catholic Review, 12
(Spring, 1985) 71–84.
2 Josef Pieper, Faith, Hope and Love, (San Francisco: Ignatius, 1997) and
Josef Pieper, The End of Time: A Meditation on the Philosophy of History
(San Francisco: Ignatius, 1999).
3 James V. Schall, ‘The Encyclical on Hope: On the De-immanentizing’
of the Christian Eschaton’, Ignatius Insight, 3 December 2007; James
171
NOTES
172
NOTES
32 Ibid.
33 Joseph Ratzinger, ‘The Dignity of the Human Person’ in Herbert
Vorgrimler (ed.), Commentary on the Documents of Vatican II Vol. V,
(New York: Herder and Herder, 1969), p. 115–64.
34 Ibid. p. 120.
35 Henri de Lubac, ‘Duplex Hominis Beatitudo’, Communio: International
Catholic Review 35 (Winter 2008) 599–612.
36 Fergus Kerr, After Aquinas: Versions of Thomism (Oxford: Blackwell,
2002), p. 134.
37 Karl Rahner, Paul Imhof and Hubert Biallowons, Faith in a Wintry
Season: Conversations and Interviews with Karl Rahner in the Last Years
of His Life, (New York: Crossroad, 1991), p. 49.
38 Romano Guardini, The Conversion of Augustine (London: Sands & Co.,
1960), pp. 68–69.
39 Jean Borella, The Sense of the Supernatural (Edinburgh: T & T Clark,
1998), p. ix.
40 Robert Spaemann, Philosophische Essays (Stuttgart: Reclam, 1983),
pp. 26–7.
41 Ibid. pp. 26–7.
42 Nicholas Healy, ‘Henri de Lubac on Nature and Grace’, Communio:
International Catholic Review (Winter 2008), 535–65 at p. 546.
43 Serge-Thomas Bonino, ‘Nature and Grace in Deus Caritas Est’, Nova
et Vetera, Vol. 5 (2), (Spring 2007) 231–48.
44 Paul J. Cordes, ‘Not Without the Light of Faith: Catholic Social
Doctrine Clarifies Its Self-Understanding’, Address at the Australian
Catholic University, Sydney, 27 November 2009, p. 6.
45 David L. Schindler, Heart of the World, Center of the Church: Communio
Ecclesiology, Liberalism and Liberation (Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1996),
p. 79.
46 George Weigel, ‘Caritas in Veritate in Gold and Red’, National Review
On-Line, 7 July 2009.
47 Karol Wojtyla, Person and Community: Selected Essays, translated by
Theresa Sandok (New York: Peter Lang, 1993), pp. 270–1.
48 Adrian Walker, ‘The Poverty of Liberal Economics’, in Doug Bandow
and David L. Schindler (eds), Wealth, Poverty and Human Destiny
(Wilmington: ISI Books, 2003), p. 23.
49 Joseph Ratzinger, ‘The Church and Economics’, Communio: Interna-
tional Catholic Review 13 (1986): 199–204 and On the Way to Jesus Christ
(San Francisco: Ignatius: 2005), p. 121.
50 Joseph Ratzinger, Interview with the Italian Catholic Agency SIR,
Rome, 7 May 2004.
51 Joseph Ratzinger, The Ratzinger Report: An Interview with Vittorio
Messori (San Francisco: Ignatius, 1985), p. 53.
52 Ibid. p. 67.
53 Joseph Ratzinger, Salt of the Earth: The Church at the End of the
Millennium (San Francisco: Ignatius, 1996), p. 266.
54 Joseph Ratzinger, Images of Hope, p. 26.
55 Joseph Ratzinger, The Yes of Jesus Christ, p. 77.
173
NOTES
CHAPTER 5
1 Joseph Ratzinger, Principles of Catholic Theology (San Francisco:
Ignatius, 1987), p. 160.
2 Ibid. p. 153.
3 Rudolf Voderholzer, ‘Dogma and History: Henri de Lubac and the
Retrieval of Historicity as a key to Theological Renewal’, Communio:
International Catholic Review, 28 (Winter 2001) 648–68 at p. 651.
4 Karl Rahner, cited in Thomas Sheehan, Karl Rahner the Philosophical
Foundations (Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press, 1987), p. xi.
5 Ibid. p. xi.
6 John D. Caputo, ‘Heidegger and Theology’ in Charles Guignon (ed.),
The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1993), p. 284.
7 Buber, M. Between Man and Man (London: Fontana, 1971), p. 203.
8 Ibid. p. 208.
9 Ibid. p. 210.
10 Joseph Ratzinger, Principles of Catholic Theology, p. 157.
11 Ibid. p. 157.
12 Ibid. p. 158.
13 Ibid. p. 174.
14 See, for example: Oscar Cullman, Salvation in History (London: SCM
Press, 1967); Christ and Time (London: SCM Press, 1962); Gottlieb
Söhngen, Die Einheit in der Theologie (Munich: Karl Zink, 1952), Aus
der Theologie der Zeit (Regensburg, 1948).
15 Joseph Ratzinger, Principles of Catholic Theology, p. 174.
16 Jean Daniélou, ‘The Conception of History in the Christian Tradition’,
Journal of Religion Vol. 30 (3) (1950) 171–9 at p. 177.
17 Ibid. p. 177.
18 Ibid. p. 177.
19 Ibid. p. 177.
20 Ibid. p. 177.
21 Avery Dulles, Revelation Theology: A History (New York: Herder and
Herder, 1969), p. 124.
22 Joseph Ratzinger, Dogmatic Theology: Eschatology: Death and Eternal
Life (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1988). p. 54.
23 Ibid. p. 54.
24 Ibid. p. 55.
25 Martin C. D’Arcy, The Sense of History: Secular and Sacred (London:
Faber & Faber, 1959), p. 182–3.
26 Joseph Ratzinger, ‘Christian Universalism: On Two Collections of
Papers by Hans Urs von Balthasar’, Communio: International Catholic
Review (Fall 1995) 545–57 at p. 546.
27 Joseph Ratzinger, Principles of Catholic Theology, p. 176.
28 Ibid. pp. 177–8.
29 Paul Henry, ‘Christian Philosophy of History’, Theological Studies,
Vol. XIII, No. 1 (March, 1952) 419–32 at p. 430.
174
NOTES
175
NOTES
CHAPTER 6
1 Joseph Ratzinger, ‘The Sorbonne Millennium Address’, translation by
Maria Klepacka. Nov. 1999.
2 Ibid.
3 Joseph Ratzinger, Truth and Tolerance: Christian Belief and World
Religions (San Francisco: Ignatius, 2004), p. 32.
4 Ibid. p. 39.
5 Ibid. p. 39.
6 Ibid. p. 40.
7 Ibid. p. 42.
8 Joseph Ratzinger, Principles of Catholic Theology, pp. 155–6.
9 Joseph Ratzinger, ‘“In the Beginning”. . . A Catholic Understanding of
Creation and the Fall’ (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1995), p. 97.
10 Ibid.
11 Balthasar, H. U. von, Love Alone is Credible (San Francisco: Ignatius,
2004), p. 16.
12 Ibid. p. 26.
13 Balthasar, H. U. von, Love Alone is Credible, p. 35.
176
NOTES
177
NOTES
CHAPTER 7
1 Joseph Ratzinger, ‘Interreligious Dialogue and Jewish-Christian Relations’,
Communio: International Catholic Review, 25 (Spring 1998) 29–40 at 32.
2 Ibid. p. 32.
3 Joseph Ratzinger, Many Religions, One Covenant: Israel, the Church
and the World (San Francisco: Ignatius: 1999), p. 94. fn 6.
4 Joseph Ratzinger, ‘Interreligious Dialogue and Jewish-Christian
Relations’, p. 38.
5 Benedict XVI, Homily in Bari, June 2005, as reported in The Tablet,
4 June 2005, p. 30.
6 Joseph Ratzinger, ‘Interreligious Dialogue and Jewish-Christian
Relations’, p. 34.
7 Ibid. p. 34.
8 Ibid. p. 34.
9 Ibid. p. 39.
10 Ibid. p. 31.
11 Joseph Ratzinger, Address of His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI, Crypt
of St Mary’s Cathedral in Sydney, 18 July 2008.
12 Joseph Ratzinger, Principles of Catholic Theology (San Francisco:
Ignatius, 1982), p. 70.
13 Gavin D’Costa, The Meeting of Religions and the Trinity (New York:
Orbis, 2000), p. 113.
14 Ibid. p. 30.
15 Ibid. p. 30.
16 Gavin D’Costa, ‘Taking Other Religions Seriously: Some Ironies in the
Current Debate on a Christian Theology of Religions’, The Thomist, 54
(3) (July 1990) 519–31 at p. 521.
17 Ibid. p. 521.
18 Ibid. p. 523.
19 John Milbank, ‘The End of Dialogue’ in G. D’Costa (ed.), Christian
Uniqueness Reconsidered: Myth of Pluralistic Theology of Religions
(London: Orbis Books, 1990), pp. 174–192.
20 Ibid.
21 Joseph Ratzinger, ‘Lecture on the Current Situation of Faith and
Theology’, L’Osservatore Romano, 6 Nov. 1996.
22 Joseph Ratzinger, Address to the Representatives of the Jewish
Community, Elysèe Palace, Paris, 12 Sept. 2008.
23 Joseph Ratzinger, ‘Interreligious Dialogue and Jewish-Christian
Relations’, p. 36.
24 Ibid. p. 36.
25 Joseph Ratzinger, Many Religions – One Covenant: Israel, the Church and
the World, p. 32.
26 Ibid. p. 63.
27 Ibid. p. 33.
178
NOTES
28 Ibid. p. 39.
29 Ibid. p. 40.
30 Ibid. p. 40.
31 Ibid. p. 41.
32 See for example: ‘Letter of His Holiness Benedict XVI to the President
of the Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews on the
Occasion of the 40th anniversary of the Declaration “Nostra Aetate”’.
33 Benedict XVI, Address during Courtesy Visit to the two chief Rabbis of
Jerusalem at Hechal Shlomo Center in Jerusalem in Pope Benedict XVI
on Christian-Muslim-Jewish Relations: Excerpts from the Addresses and
Homilies of His Holiness Pope Benedict XVU during his Pilgrimage to
the Holy Land (8–15 May 2009), (Sydney: Columban Mission Institute,
2009).
34 James V. Schall, ‘The Regensburg Lecture’ (South Bend, IN: St Augustine’s
Press, 2007), pp. 44–5.
35 Address of Benedict XVI to the Meeting with the Diplomatic Corps
to the Republic of Turkey, 28 Nov. 2006.
36 Benedict XVI, ‘Letter to the Participants in the Third Ecumenical
Assembly organized by the Council of European Episcopal Conferences
and by the Conference of European Churches’, Castel Gandolfo, 20
Aug. 2007.
37 Benedict XVI, Catechesis on the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity,
18 Jan. 2006.
38 Benedict XVI, ‘Address to an Ecumenical Delegation from Finland
on the Occasion of the Feast of Saint Henrik’, 18 Jan. 2008.
39 John Allen Jnr, ‘Ratzinger credited with saving Lutheran Pact’, National
Catholic Reporter, 10 Sept. 1999.
40 Joseph Ratzinger, Address of His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI,
Archbishop’s House, Cologne, 19 Aug. 2005.
41 Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, ‘Note of the Congregation
for the Doctrine of the Faith about Personal Ordinariates for Anglicans
Entering the Catholic Church’, Oct. 2009.
42 Digby Anderson, ‘English Gentlemen’, New Directions, Oct. 2008, p. 29.
43 Ibid. p. 29.
44 Robert Mickens, ‘Pope committed to unity with Orthodox’, The Tablet,
4 June 2005, p. 30.
45 Patriarch Bartholomew I, ‘Speech delivered in the Sistine Chapel’,
18 Oct. 2008.
46 Joseph Ratzinger, The Episcopate and the Primacy (New York: Herder
and Herder, 1962), pp. 58–9.
47 Joseph Ratzinger, ‘Primat’ in Josef Höfer and Karl Rahner (eds), Lexikon
für Theologie und Kirche, (Freiburg: Verlag Herder, 1963), p. 763.
48 Robert Moynihan, ‘A Walk by Night’, Inside the Vatican, 12 Nov. 2009.
49 Joseph Ratzinger, Milestones: Memoirs 1927–1977 (San Francisco:
Ignatius, 1998), p. 98 and Co-Workers of the Truth: Meditations for Every
Day of the Year (San Francisco: Ignatius, 1992), p. 124.
50 F. A. Murphy, ‘De Lubac, Ratzinger and von Balthasar: A Communal
Adventure in Ecclesiology’ in F. A. Murphy and C. Asprey (eds),
179
NOTES
180
NOTES
CONCLUSION
1 Hans Urs von Balthasar, Martin Buber and Christianity: A Dialogue
between Israel and the Church (London: Harvill Press, 1960), p. 9.
2 Philip Blosser, ‘The Kasper-Ratzinger Debate and the State of the
Church’, New Oxford Review (April, 2002) 18–25 at p. 25.
3 Paul Claudel, Positions et Propositions (Paris: Gallimard, 1926), p. 175.
4 Ibid. p. 175.
5 Peter Wust, Crisis in the West (London: Sheed and Ward, 1931), p. 53.
6 J. Mouroux, L’experience chretienne (Paris: Aubier, 1952), p. 5 as quoted
by A. Maggiolini, ‘Magisterial Teaching on Experience in the Twentieth
Century: From the Modernist Crisis to the Second Vatican Council’,
Communio: International Catholic Review, (Summer 1996) 225–43.
7 Lieven Boeve, God Interrupts History: Theology in a Time of Upheaval
(New York: Continuum, 2007), p. 4.
8 Ibid. p. 4.
9 Ibid. p. 100.
10 Roger Scruton, The Philosopher on Dover Beach (Manchester: Carcanet,
1990), p. 123.
11 William T. Cavanaugh, Theopolitical Imagination (Edinburgh: T & T
Clark, 2003), p. 5.
12 For a poetic expression of this idea see Gottfiried Benn, ‘Verlorenes Ich’,
the Penguin Book of German Verse (New York: Penguin, 1957), 425–7.
181
SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY
182
SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY
183
SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY
184
SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY
185
SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY
186
SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY
187
SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY
188
SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY
SECONDARY SOURCES
Balthasar, H. U. von, Martin Buber and Christianity: A Dialogue Between
Israel and the Church (London: Harvill Press, 1960).
Balthasar, H. U. von, A Theological Anthropology (New York: Sheed and
Ward, 1967).
Balthasar, H. U. von, Love Alone is Credible (San Francisco: Ignatius, 2004).
Bardazzi, M. In the Vineyard of the Lord: The Life, Faith and Teachings of
Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI (New York: Rizzoli, 2005).
Batlogg, A. R., Michalski, Melvin E. and Turner, Barbara G., Encounters
with Karl Rahner: Remembrance of Rahner by Those who Knew Him
(Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 2009).
Biemer, G. ‘Theodor Haecker: In the Footsteps of John Henry Newman’,
New Blackfriars, Vol. 81. Number 957, July, 2007.
Blondel, M. Action (1893): Essay on a Critique of Life and a Science of
Practice, trans. Olivia Blanchette (Indiana: University of Notre Dame
Press, 1986).
Blosser, P. ‘The Kasper-Ratzinger Debate and the State of the Church’,
New Oxford Review, (April 2002), 18–25.
Boeve, L. Interrupting Tradition: An Essay on Christian Faith in a
Postmodern Context (Leuven: Peeters Press, 2003).
Boeve, L. God Interrupts History: Theology in a Time of Upheaval (New
York: Continuum, 2007).
Bonino, S-T. ‘Nature and Grace in Deus Caritas Est’, Nova et Vetera, Vol. 5
(2) (Spring 2007), 231–48.
Bosco, M. ‘Georges Bernanos and Francis Poulenc: Catholic Convergences
in Dialogues of the Carmelites’, Logos, 12 (2) (Spring, 2009), 17–40.
Canty, A. ‘Bonaventurian Resonances in Benedict XVI’s Theology of
Revelation’, Nova et Vetera, Vol. 5 (2) (Spring, 2007), 249–67.
Caputo, J. D. ‘Heidegger and Theology’, in Charles Guignon (ed.) The
Cambridge Companion to Heidegger(Cambridge University Press, 1993),
pp. 270–89.
Chaput, C. J. ‘Reflections on Cardinal Kasper’s “On the Church”’, America,
30 July 2001.
Congar, Y. ‘Johann Adam Möhler 1796–1838’, Theologische Quartelschrift
(1970), 47–51.
Congar, Y. The Revelation of God (New York: Herder and Herder, 1968).
Copleston, F. ‘Peter Wust: Christian and Philosopher’, in On the History
of Philosophy, (New York: Barnes and Noble, 1979).
Daniélou, J, ‘The Conception of History in the Christian Tradition’, Journal
of Religion, Vol. 30 (3) (1950), 171–9.
D’Arcy, M. C. The Sense of History: Secular and Sacred (London: Faber &
Faber, 1959).
DeClue, R. G. ‘Primacy and Collegiality in the Works of Joseph Ratzinger’,
Communio: International Catholic Review 35 (Winter, 2008), 642–70.
Dietrich, D. J. and Haines, M. J. (eds); The Legacy of the Tübingen School:
the Relevance of Nineteenth Century Theology for the Twenty-First Century
(New York: Crossroad, 1997).
189
SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY
190
SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY
191
SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY
192
SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY
193
This page intentionally left blank
INDEX
Abelard, Peter 26 Barth, Karl 63, 96, 97, 98, 113, 125
acedia 80 Bartholomew I 141
Acton, Harold 41 Basil the Great, Saint 37
Adorno, Theodor 33, 72, 74, 75 Bauer, Bruno 56
Aestheticism 33 Baur, F. C. 122
Aeterni Patris 2, 9 Beatles, The 41
Afanasiev, Nicholas 142 beauty 21, 22, 26, 29, 32, 33, 43, 46,
agape 82, 121 71, 80, 98, 113, 118, 121, 158
Aggiornamento 48 Beethoven, Ludwig 37
Alfeyev, Archbishop Hilarion 141–2 Behler, Wolfgang 33
Alighieri, Dante 76 being and love 119
alienation 35 Bernanos, Georges 4, 20, 38, 39,
Anderson, Digby 140, 141 77, 81, 153
Anderson, Bishop George 139 Bernard, Saint 26
Anglicans 140, 149, 150, 151, 159 Bildung 25, 71, 99, 105, 106
Anglican Ordinariate 140, 150 Billot, Louis 84
Annales de Philosophie Bio-technology 17, 122
Chrétienne 19 Blake, William 13
Apollonian music 34 Blank, Reiner 57
Aristotle 3, 14, 16, 146 Bloch, Ernst 72, 73
Astrology 67 Blondel, Maurice 19, 49, 52, 53, 62,
Augustine, Saint 4, 13, 14, 15, 19, 110, 153, 156
30, 79, 80, 85, 110, 112, 115, Blosser, Philip 152, 153
117, 142, 145, 148, 153, 155 Böckle, Franz 5
Boethius 20, 110
Baader, Franz Xaver von 10 Boeve, Lieven 62, 65, 66, 158–9
Bach, Johann Sebastian 37 Bonaventure, Saint 4, 13, 17–18,
Bahrdt, K. F. 56 30, 50–1, 55, 72, 94, 113,
Balthasar, Hans Urs von 5, 9, 15, 19, 153, 156
20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 27, 30, 39, 53, Bonino, Serge-Thomas 82, 85–6
54, 55, 61, 62, 67, 73, 82, 84, 104, Bonsor, Jack Arthur 108
105, 112, 113, 119, 120, 123–4, Boot, Alexander 45, 83
142, 144, 148, 152, 153, 156 Borella, Jean 85
195
INDEX
196
INDEX
197
INDEX
198
INDEX
199
INDEX
200
INDEX
201
INDEX
Theological virtues 16, 71, 73, 82, Varro, Marcus Terrentius 114,
104, 105, 123–4 115, 157
Thérèse of Lisieux, Saint 105 Veritatis Splendor 155
Thomas Aquinas, Saint 2, 3, 14, 15, Vico, Giambattista 122
17, 36, 49, 50, 62, 79, 80, 85, Voderholzer, Rudolf 94
91, 94, 143, 148, 155 Voegelin, Eric 73, 74
Tracy, David 27, 63, 158–9 Voluntarism 136, 137
tradition 1, 3, 46, 48, 49, 51, 53,
62–3, 64, 66, 155, 156, 157 Walker, Adrian 89
Traditional Anglican Communion Watkin, E. I. 13
150 Waugh, Evelyn 41
traditionalists 38, 40, 41, 44, 45, 46, Weber, Carl Maria von 24
62–3 ‘Westman’ 45
Trent, Council of 54 ‘Whig Thomism’ 87, 113
Trinity 71, 90, 110, 111 Wiechert, Ernst 4
Truth 2, 71 Wiegel, George 87, 88
and love 113 Williamson, Richard 44
Twomey, D. Vincent 1 Wojtyła, Karol 5, 13, 14, 88, 89,
99, 113
Ut Unum Sint 138 Wordsworth, William 13
‘utlity music’ 33, 40 Wust, Peter 4, 13, 14, 153,
154, 155
Vanhoozer, Kevin 61
Vanhoye, Cardinal Albert 51 Yeago, David S. 47
202