Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Framework
Economic Development Department
October 2015
1|P a g e
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 3
1.1 Contextual Background ................................................................................................................. 3
1.2. Project Brief....................................................................................................................................... 4
1.3M&E framework ................................................................................................................................. 4
2.Methodology ........................................................................................................................................... 4
3. Theoretical framework .........................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
4. Legislative framework ........................................................................................................................... 5
4.1 Policy Framework for the Government-wide Monitoring and Evaluation ............................ 5
4.2 Provincial –Wide Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (PWMEF) ....................................... 5
4.3 Monitoring and evaluation in the City of Cape Town Context .............................................. 6
5. Governance ........................................................................................................................................... 7
5.1 Defining monitoring ......................................................................................................................... 8
5.2 Defining evaluation ......................................................................................................................... 8
5.3 Objectives of M&E: .......................................................................................................................... 9
5.4 Relationship between Monitoring and Evaluation .................................................................... 9
6. Economic Development Department ............................................................................................... 9
6.1 Purpose and service mandate of Economic Development Department ........................... 9
7. Putting the M&E Framework into practice ...................................................................................... 10
7.1 Phase 1: Planning .......................................................................................................................... 11
7.2 Phase 2: Monitoring ....................................................................................................................... 18
7.3 Phase 3- Evaluation ....................................................................................................................... 20
7.4 Phase 4 - Evaluation report .......................................................................................................... 24
7.5 Phase 5 - Communicating and providing feedback of M&E to stakeholder .................... 24
8. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 25
9. References ............................................................................................................................................ 26
10. Annexures .............................................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
10. 1 Annexure 1 ....................................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
10.2 Annexure 2 .....................................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
10.3 Annexure 3 .....................................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
2|P a g e
1. Introduction
It is expected that local area development is demonstrated to community members and this
raises a challenge of local government having to provide proof of meaningful impact on
community members’ lives. To meet the challenge local public and private sector actors
must work together in order to create sustainable local economies and provide physical and
documented evidence of such developments.
The rationale of placing Cape Town in a broader economic context is to make Cape Town a
competitive city to enable it to address the challenges it faces.
The need for providing evidence of development gives rise to the development and
implementation of a Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) system, and this document will
constitute as a framework for the above mentioned system.
3|P a g e
1.2. Project Brief
The EDD M&E project is aimed at facilitating the development of M&E mechanisms and
indicators for the Department as well as for the Economic Development projects. M & E
project outcomes should assist in assessing whether the Economic Development Department
is achieving its intended objectives or not, what are the areas of weakness are and what the
areas of strength are.
2. Methodology
The methodology used in developing the M & E framework is a combination of desktop
information collection and benchmarking and work shopping of the project with EDD staff.
The project evolution has been guided by the project management team (PMT) which met
on weekly basis.
Below are project methodological tools\mechanisms that have been used to develop the
EDD M & E Framework:
• Literature Review: This formed the crucial base for the framework as it entailed getting
background information from similar initiatives for benchmarking purposes.
• Review of all EDD documents: This exercise aimed at establishing the basis upon
which the programmes, projects, and services was planned and implemented in the
Department.
• Consultation with EDD staff.
4|P a g e
3. Legislative framework
5|P a g e
decision-making processes of the Provincial Government (Department of the Premier,
2009:47).
The policy prescribes that the Performance management system must include the following
components:
6|P a g e
Adapted from Performance Management Framework (Compliance) Policy
4. Governance
Public institutions constantly strive for more efficiency and effectiveness. Greater efficiency
and effectiveness come from:
Monitoring and Evaluation is an important tool which enables users to evaluate the links
between:
7|P a g e
Monitoring and Evaluation systems provide users with reliable evidence on which to base
their decisions to apportion spending and budget priorities. They help to analyse and identify
how important challenges should be dealt with identify lessons learned from programmes
and projects and provide learning for future programmes and projects implementation.
Functions of evaluation
Both monitoring and evaluation are geared towards learning from what you are doing and
how you are doing it, by focusing on:
Efficiency tells you that the input into the work is appropriate in terms of the output.
Effectiveness is a measure of the extent to which developments programme or
projects achieve the specific objectives it set.
8|P a g e
Impact tells you whether or not your actions made a difference to the problem
situation you were trying to address (Kusek & Rist 2004:12).
From this it should be clear that monitoring and evaluation are best done when there has
been proper planning against which to assess progress and achievements.
9|P a g e
knowledge of economic development. It contributes to the City’s core business by leading,
advising, advocating, and facilitating implementation of programmes and partnerships to
support the city’s economic development agenda (Economic Development Department
business plan).
Planning for M&E usually takes place concurrently to the strategic planning and project
planning. This adoption of M&E takes place over 5 phases if Kusek and Rist (2004) 10 steps to
10 | P a g e
a Results Based Monitoring and Evaluation Framework system is divided into phases. It is thus
suggested when plans are compiled and considered for the department, unit and projects
officials should consider how will it be known whether the goals or outcomes have been
achieved, how will action be kept on tract, and action be kept track of, and how will
corrective action be taken when needed. These considerations will inform the M&E planning
which is basically concerned with tracking, assessing and reviewing performance and
delivery. The five phases of M&E implementation is graphically demonstrated below.
Phase 5:
Communicating and
Phase 1: Planning for Phase 2: Conducting Phase 3: Conducting Phase 4: Reporting on
providing feedback in
M&E monitoring evaluations M&E findings
respect of M&E and
delivery
The theory of change will help managers to demonstrate a linear path of cause and effect
(Taplin and Clark, 2012). It will also position the departmental programme within a wider
analysis of how change will come about and help the Department in articulating its
understanding of how it intend change to occur. It will also challenges the developers to
explore the intervention further by considering the wider systems in which the policy exist and
the environment and actors that influence it
The development of the theory of change involves identifying what inputs are needed to
perform the specific activities required to produce certain outputs that will help the
Department achieve its outcomes and assist in reaching of the City’s goals.
11 | P a g e
Identify the Identify the Identify the Identify outputs Identify
Outcomes
Inputs
Activities
Outputs
Impact
resources activities that deliverables required to envisioned long-
needed for will result in viewed as achieve impacts term goal
activities desired output necessary to (Indicators, (Indicators,
(Indicators, (Indicators, achieve baselines, baselines,
baselines, baselines, outcomes targets) targets)
targets) targets) (Indicators,
baselines,
targets)
The various inputs required, for delivery on the defined activities (Step 5) Steps 1 and 2
generally relate to strategic planning (as reflected within the IDP and EGS), while steps 3, 4
and 5 tend to align more with the City’s ‘business planning’ and annual planning processes.
By nature, the theory of change process usually starts from impact to input. The identification
of the impact basically involves the identification of the envisaged long-term goals- what the
Department aims to change. These impacts then normally align with the IDPs goals.
As many factors influences goals and impact, like the policy environments, international
events, research, stakeholders and politicians, the identification of the envisioned impacts
should thus include :
A status quo analysis, and research into the future vision for the City – with due
consideration challenges and opportunity faced, shaping forces, and dynamics
within other spheres of government;
A problem analysis – to identify the gaps between the desired future, the current
state and the causal steps to support a movement to this future
Testing the future vision and the desired impacts through participatory processes
Refining the defined impacts, on the basis of thorough analysis of information
emerging from the research and stakeholder engagement process; and
Recognising the need to review ‘impacts’ on a regular basis, ensuring continued
applicability in the context of a rapidly changing environment (Rabie, 2011: 120).
12 | P a g e
After the impact has been determined, it needs to be considered what we wish to achieve
by change the situation. This involves the identification of outcomes that will contribute to the
achievement of the goals or desired. Outcomes are usually positive present-tense
statements of the changed state, identified through an inclusive, participatory process – with
the underlying logic and assumptions reviewed, debated and through this process, jointly-
owned by all stakeholders (Rabie, 2011: 120).
Next project/programme managers should identify outputs that link to the outcomes.
Outputs are usually framed within the context of short and medium term delivery reflected in
documents like the SDBIB, business plans, unit plans and individual performance assessment.
When developing outputs:
Always prioritize outputs
Focus on what should be delivered, achieved, provided and produced (stated in
past tense)
Following the output development process, the activities/ tasks and jobs that should be done
to deliver the output should be determined. These activities should always be in present
tense, contain a verb and should align to both inputs and outputs (Rabie, 2011: 120)..
In this regards, inputs refer to resources that we use to do the work. These usually include
human resources, financial resources, skills, consensus amongst other things.
13 | P a g e
14 | P a g e
Step 2 - Indicators
In order to know whether and when we achieved our planned impacts, outcomes, outputs,
activities and inputs it’s essential to identify indicators that will enable assessment of these
things. Indicators are “the quantitative or qualitative variables that provide a simple and
reliable means to measure achievement, to reflect the changes connected to an
intervention, or to help assess the performance of an organisation against the stated
outcome” (Kusek & Rist, 2004:95).
Kusek and Risk further argues that indicators need to be:
“Clear Precise and unambiguous
Relevant Appropriate to the subject at hand
Economic Available at a reasonable cost
Adequate Provide a sufficient basis to assess performance
Monitorable Amenable to independent validation” (Kusek & Rist, 2004:95).
Indicators should further encapsulate time, quality and quantity standards, be precise, be
responsive to programmes and be unaffected by change.
Step 3 - Baseline
The next step is to determine where exactly we are before the monitoring exercise begins.
This information can be collected in many ways.
Conversatio
ns with informal Focus Direct Field
concerned interviews groups census experiment
individiuals s
Review of
Field official One time
Surveys
visits documen survey
ts
15 | P a g e
Step 4 – Setting targets
Following step 3 targets needs to be set. Targets here will provide the planned value against
which an indicator will be measured against at a specific time in the future. Thus the target
should encapsulate the specific number, time and location to be realised. Targets should be:
Next it would be ideal to determine the mechanisms through which progress against defined
targets is to be assessed, for both evaluation and monitoring. The means of verification will
tell us where we should obtain the data necessary to prove the objectives defined by the
indicator have been reached. The different data collection sources are graphically
illustrated below (Rabie, 2011:97).
Key informantl
Focus groups Questionnaires One time survey census
interviews
Field experiments
Step 6- Integration
Following the completion of Steps 1 to 5, the M&E planning process comes to a conclusion
through the integration of all elements (indicators, baselines, targets and data collection/
MoVs) into various levels of integrated M&E plans. On completion of this planning phase
potential for improved delivery is increased. A log frame should house all these different
elements.
16 | P a g e
Logical Framework
Activities • What you do to accomplish your • Any external factors • Where we should obtain
• What you do to accomplish your objectives?
objectives? which may adversely the data necessary to
• What else do you do to accomplish these
objectives? Are there any sub-objectives that Example: Training affect the attainment of prove the objectives
should be measured?
the stated objectives defined by the indicator
has been reached
Inputs/
• Quantifiable resources going in to your • Any external factors
Resources
Quantifiable resources going in to your activities – the activities – the things you budget for. which may adversely
things you budget for. affect the attainment of
Examples: # of training manuals
the stated objectives
amount of money spent on
the training workshop
17 | P a g e
Conclusively, the key steps covered in the planning stage.
The primary focus of monitoring is the gathering, collating, inspecting and analysing of
information, in the context of indicators and short, medium and long-term targets.
This step firstly involves identifying the most appropriate tools through which monitoring-
related (or evaluation-related) information will be gathered and analysed. The choice and
confirmation of monitoring tools is usually directly related to the level of the outcomes
approach being assessed, audience and level of detail to collect. Monitoring tools is usually
divided amongst three categories. Examples of monitoring tools across the categories are
illustrated below.
18 | P a g e
Monitoring tools should in most cases be supported by a monitoring system through which
indicators; baseline information, data and analysis can be stored, maintained and readily
accessed (Rabie, 2011:100). In setting this system up developers should consider
What data will be collected? (i.e. source)
How often will data be collected? (i.e. frequency)
How will data be collected? (i.e. methodology)
Who will collect the data?
Who will report on the data?
For whom is data collected?
After the supporting monitoring system is established a manager of the system should be
identified to ensure the system managed, maintained and the data kept on it is credible.
19 | P a g e
Step 4 - Reporting on findings
The M&E Framework will only be of value if findings are reported on and put into action,
where necessary. It should also noted that there are a set of pre-defined reporting
mechanisms in place within the City, many of which are legislated – while others represent
good practice that has evolved within the City over time.
Monitoring reports such as the quarterly review report assists in building an understanding of
progress and delivery in the context of business plans and the SDBIP, thereby ensuring on-
going strategy-aligned implementation.
20 | P a g e
There are 6 types of evaluations. The table below host the types of evaluation.
Aims to evaluate whether an intervention’s operational Once or several times Secondary data – e.g.
mechanisms support achievement or not and understand why. during the intervention statistical analyses; interviews;
Looks at activities, outputs, and outcomes, use of resources and focus groups discussions;
Implementation the causal links. It builds on existing monitoring systems, and is direct observation; literature
evaluation applied during programme operation to improve the efficiency reviews
and efficacy of operational processes. It also assesses the Field work – e.g. participant
21 | P a g e
quality of the indicators and assumptions. This can be rapid observation; data collection,
primarily using secondary data or in-depth with extensive field and survey research
work.
Seeks to measure changes in outcomes and the well-being Designed early on, Quasi-experimental design
of the baseline implemented with before and after
Designed early on, baseline implemented early, impact early, impact checked at comparisons of project and
checked at key stages e.g. 3/5 years key stages e.g. 3/5 years control populations
The target population that is attributable to a specific Ex-post comparison of project
intervention. Its purpose is to inform high-level officials on the and non-equivalent control
Impact evaluation extent to which an intervention should be continued or not, group
and if there are any potential modifications needed. This
kind of evaluation is implemented on a case-by-case basis.
22 | P a g e
The evaluation process would involve:
•Develop a structure for your analysis, basis on your intuitive understanding of emerging theme and corcerns, and
Step 3 where you suspect there have variations from what you had hoped and/or expected
•Go through your data, organising it under the theme and concerns.
Step 4
•Write up your finding and conclusions. Work out possible way forward (recommendations)
Step 6
23 | P a g e
6.4 Phase 4 - Evaluation report
This phase also involves communicating the M&E findings to the City’s wider range of
stakeholders. To maximise the extent of this exercise it needs to be determine
beforehand, which stakeholders should be kept up to date, how often, in what
format and the frequency. Officials can consult the draft stakeholder engagement
framework to determine the before mentioned. A communication strategy aligned
to the M&E Plan will assist in ensuring follow-through in this regard. In this way, the
credibility of the system and those who manage it will be supported. Stakeholders
will also be afforded the opportunity to gain a real understanding and appreciation
of the efforts, achievements and challenges faced by the City.
24 | P a g e
To gain support—demonstrating results to help gain support among
stakeholders
To promote understanding—reporting results to enhance understanding of
projects, programs, and policies.” (Kusek & Rist, 2004: 130).
7. Conclusion
This M&E Framework aimed at creating a shared understanding of the realm within
which M&E occurs, clarifying concepts, exploring reporting processes, systems and
tools of M&E. Good practice principles in relation to M&E systems have been
explored, along with accepted practices in terms of M&E implementation.
Ultimately, this framework is primarily concerned with ensuring a real focus on the
delivery of the Economic development long-term outcomes – through short and
medium-term planning, delivery, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms, and the
associated reporting.
If the M&E framework and system is implemented correctly it would enable the unit,
programme and project managers to:
Have an on-going picture of progress
Use resources efficiently
Plan workflow
Identify problems, solutions and opportunities
Have archived records of events
Motivate staff by illustrating purpose of work
Establish baselines
Provide information for decisions
Review causes of a problem
Assist in deciding amongst alternatives
Build consensus on the causes and responses to a problem
Identify unintended results
25 | P a g e
References
City of Cape Town. 2013. Economic Growth Strategy. Available at:
https://www.capetown.gov.za/en/IDP/Documents/EconomicGrowthStrategy.pdf.
Accessed on 20 February 2015.
City of Cape Town. 2011. Performance Management Framework (Compliance).
Available at:
https://www.capetown.gov.za/en/Policies/All%20Policies/Performance%20Managem
ent%20Framework%20(Compliance)%20Policy%20-
%20approved%20on%2011%20May%202011.pdf. Accessed on 09 May 2015.
Department of the Premier. 2009. Provincial-wide Monitoring and Evaluation
Strategy. Available at: https://www.westerncape.gov.za/other/2010/4/the_provincial-
wide_monitoring_and_evaluation_system_provincial
wide_monitoring_and_evaluation_framework_2009.pdf. Accessed on 07 April 2015.
Drucker, P. 1954. The Practice of Management. New York: Harper.
Kusek, J.Z. & Rist, R.C. 2004. Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and
evaluation system. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
National Humanities Centre. 2005. Frederick Wilson Taylor, The Principles of
Scientific Management, 1911. Available at:
https://www.google.co.za/search?client=ms-android-om-
lge&site=webhp&source=hp&ei=qaAhVfa-
B4v0UrSWg7gI&q=Monitoring+and+evaluation+report&oq=Monitoring+and+evaluati
on+report&gs_l=mobile-gws-
hp.3..0l5.2138.17057.0.22591.26.25.1.10.10.8.2524.17411.3-
11j4j4j1j2j2j1.25.0.msedr...0...1c.1.64.mobile-gws-hp..2.24.12767.3.lk-uOp-
QCbs#q=scientific+management+theory+pdf
Rabie,B. 2011. Improving the systematic evaluation of local economic development
results in South African local government. PhD. Stellenboschh University.
Segone, M. (ed) 2008a. Bridging the gap. The role of monitoring and evaluation in
evidence-based policy making. UNICEF Evaluation Working Papers Issue # 12.
Romania: UNICEF.
Taplin, D and Clark, H. 2012. Theory of Change Basics. Available at:
http://www.theoryofchange.org/library/publications/. Accessed on 12 May 2015.
The Presidency. Republic of South Africa. 2007. Policy Framework for the
Government-wide monitoring and evaluation system. Pretoria: The Presidency.
Vigoda,E. 2003. New Public Management. Available at:
http://poli.haifa.ac.il/~eranv/material_vigoda/NPM.pdf
26 | P a g e
Economic Development Department logframe
28 | P a g e