BUSI 3158
20 Credits, Level 3, Autumn 2020 to Spring 2021
1
Details of Module Convenor and Teaching Staff
Available to all Part II students. CANNOT be taken if taking or have taken BUSI
2065/ N12616 Management Strategy, N12410 Strategic Management: Content and
Analysis, or BUSI 3132/ N13420 Strategic Management: Process and Practice
Contact Hours:
Autumn: 11 x 90 minute whole class sessions (lectures/ workshops), and one 2 hour
seminar.
Spring : 11 x 90 minute whole class sessions (lectures/ workshops), and one 2 hour
seminar.
Module Aims:
To provide students of management with key tools, concepts and frameworks of strategic
analysis and to examine the process of strategy implementation.
2
Outline of Lecture and Syllabus
http://timetablingunmc.nottingham.ac.uk:8016/reporting/Individual;module;id;032550/01
%0D%0A?days=1-5&weeks=3-14&periods=3-
20&template=SWSCUST+module+Individual&height=100&week=100
Intellectual skills
This module develops:
The ability to analyse facts and circumstances to determine the cause of a problem and
identifying and selecting appropriate solutions
Conceptual and critical thinking, analysis, synthesis and evaluation
3
Transferable (key) skills
This module develops:
Self-management and a readiness to accept responsibility and flexibility, to be resilient,
self-starting and appropriately assertive, to plan, organise and manage time
Articulating and effectively explaining information
Building and maintaining relationships.
This Module Outline should be read in conjunction with your Student Handbook.
Feedback on Teaching
The School operates a system of formal teaching appraisal (termed SET/SEM). You may be
asked to complete a short on-line questionnaire relating to the teaching on this module.
Your co-operation would be very much appreciated, as we value feedback to maintain the
quality of our programmes. SET/SEM is completed online using Evaluate.
Assessment DETAILS
Autumn 2020
Select an organisation (in discussion with your module convenor/s). Identify a key strategic
problem /issue facing the organisation of your choice and analyse the problem / issue through
the application of relevant strategic theory /frameworks learnt in class. From your analysis
how would you recommend the organisation respond to this strategic issue?
Please note that 4000 words (excluding references) with a 10% plus or minus
tolerance will be permitted. All words including those in tables and figures are
included within this word count. Coursework which exceeds this word count will normally
be treated as having a major error (as defined in the Business School’s Undergraduate
Marking Guide) and hence will be limited to a maximum of 59%.
Any coursework that is not appropriately referenced in Harvard Style (as explained in your
UG Student Handbook) in the text where required and with a single and matching alphabetical
list of Harvard Style references under the heading of References at the end of your
coursework will be deemed to have a major error.
4
2. Do note that it may take up to 24 hours to obtain the Turn-it-In Similarity Index Report
when you submit your final coursework onto MOODLE TURN-IT-IN. Hence you should
complete this much earlier.
3. You may use the Test-your-Text Tab for Turn-It-In to determine your similarity index
before submitting the final coursework assignment.
Five marks will be deducted for each working day (or part thereof) if coursework is submitted
after the official deadline date without an extension having been obtained. Except in
exceptional circumstances, late submission penalties will apply automatically unless a claim
for extenuating circumstances is made within five calendar days following an assessment
deadline.
The group coursework marks will only be available after 18 January 2021, i.e. after the
examination period.
Spring 2021
Final Examination: One 2 hour examination (contributes 50% towards the module grade).
There are two sections in the paper. Answer two compulsory questions from section A, each
worth 30 marks. One question from a choice of four from Section B, worth 40 marks.
The Teaching timetable for Spring 2021, will be updated in due time
5
Reading List
AUTUMN 2020
Principal text:
Title: Contemporary Strategy Analysis (9th edition)
Author: Robert Grant | Publisher: Wiley | Copyright: 2016 (Other editions are fine)
We will, however, explore issues that fall outside of the scope of, or are not covered in
sufficient detail in, the course text. There are a range of recommended readings for each
topic, which should be used to both supplement and complement the principal text.
The Reading List also provides additional book titles, which you may find useful.
Search “BUSI 3158” from: readinglist.nottingham.edu.my or click
https://rl.talis.com/3/unmc/lists/27B7EA0A-4322-3D71-8CBD-6F0B40607900.html
Grant, Chapter 1.
Hambrick, D., & Fredrickson, J. (2001). Are you sure you have a strategy? Academy
of Management Executive, 15(4), 48-59.
Mintzberg, H. (2014). Five Ps for Strategy in Lampel, J., Mintzberg, H., Quinn, J.,
Goshal, S. The Strategy Process. Pearson: UK.
o (The above excerpt will be made available within lecture 1 and on Moodle)
Porter, M. E. (1996). What is Strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61-78.
Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The Right Game: Use Game Theory
to Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.
Porter, M. E. (2008). The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy. Harvard
Business Review, 86(1), 78-93.
Rumelt, R. P. (1991). How Much Does Industry Matter? Strategic Management
Journal, 12(3), 167-185.
Yoffie, D. B., & Kwak, M. (2006). With Friends Like These. Harvard Business Review,
84(9), 88-98.
Grant, Chapter 5.
6
Leonard, D. (1992). Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A paradox in Managing New
Product Development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 111-125.
Prahalad, C. and Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation, Harvard
Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
- Generic Strategies
Banker, R., Mashruwala, R., & Tripathy, A. (2014). Does a differentiation strategy
lead to more sustainable financial performance than a cost leadership
strategy?. Management Decision, 52(5), 872-896.
Porter M. (1996). What is Strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61-78.
Thornhill, S. and White, R. E. (2007). Strategic Purity: A Multi-Industry Evaluation of
Pure vs. Hybrid Business Strategies, Strategic Management Journal, 28(5), 553-561.
Grant, pp.216-221.
7
Goold, Michael, and Andrew Campbell. "Do you have a well-designed organization?."
Harvard business review 80.3 (2002): 117-24.
Campbell, A., Goold, M., & Alexander, M. (1995). Corporate Strategy: The Quest for
Parenting Advantage. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 120-132.
Wilden, R., Gudergan, S. P., Nielsen, B. B., & Lings, I. (2013). Dynamic capabilities
and performance: strategy, structure and environment. Long Range Planning, 46(1),
72-96.
Notes:
- Additional Readings as needed will be informed / provided during class
- This module outline is a guide to teaching and learning for this course. It may be
changed due to current developments and unforeseen circumstances
=====================================================
SPRING 2021
Lampel, Mintzberg, H., Quinn, B. & Ghoshal, S. (2014) The Strategy Process:
Concepts, Contexts, Cases (Fifth Edition) Pearson. (LMQG)
Dobson, P., Starkey, K. & Richards, (2004) Strategic Management: Issues and Cases,
Blackwell (DSR) (Available from the library as an eBook library resource. Please
contact the library for further details).
Additional reading:
The following business magazines are recommended for cases and developments in industry-
- The Financial Times (FT), The EDGE (Malaysia / Singapore), The Business Week, The
Economist, Fortune, Forbes Asia and the business sections of the good quality
newspapers are good sources of information (Eg Saturday edition of The STAR has a
StarBiz). For further sources of company information for coursework please consult
the library.
Some additional readings that may be provided during the lecture / case sessions
8
Topic: Strategy Execution and Organisation
References
Dobson, Starkey & Richards (DSR) Ch. 5
Lampel, Mintzberg, Quinn & Ghoshal (LMQG)–Ch. 3 (Reading 3.3 Hamel & Prahalad
–
‘Strategic Intent’); Ch. 5 (5.4 Pascale – ‘The Honda Effect’); Ch. 8 (8.1 Mintzberg –
‘The Structuring of Organizations’)
Collins, J. C. & Porras, J. I. (1994) Built to Last: Successful habits of visionary
companies, Harper Business.
Hamel, G. (2009) Moon Shots for Management, Harvard Business Review, Vol.87
No.2, pp.91-98.
Hamel, G. & Valikangas, L. (2003) The quest for resilience, Harvard Business Review,
Vol.81 No.9, pp.52-63.
Kirby, J. (2005) Toward a theory of high performance, Harvard Business Review,
Vol.83 No.7/8, pp.30-39.
Nohria, N., Joyce, W., & Roberson, B. (2003) What really works, Harvard Business
Review, Vol.81 No.7, pp.42-52.
Peters, T. & Waterman, R. (1982) In Search of Excellence, Harper & Row.
(Retrospective reviews in (2002) Academy of Management Executive, Vol.16 No.1,
pp.38-56.)
Rosenzweig, P. (2007) Misunderstanding the nature of company performance: the
Halo Effect and other business delusions, California Management Review, Vol.49 No.4,
pp.6-20.
Waterman, Jr, R. H., Peters, T. J., & Phillips, J. R. (1980) Structure is not organization.
Business Horizons, Vol.23 No.3, pp.14-26.
References
(DSR) - Ch. 6
(LMQG)- Ch. 2 (2.1 Mintzberg – ‘The Manager’s Job’; 2.3 Wrapp – ‘Good Managers Do
Not Make Policy Decisions’; 2.4 Senge – ‘The Leader’s New Work: Building Learning
Organizations’); Ch. 12 (12.2 - Selznick ‘Leadership in Administration’)
Ancona, D., Malone, T. W., Orlikowski, W. J. & Senge, P. (2007) In praise of the
incomplete leader, Harvard Business Review, Vol.85 No.2, pp.92-100.
Collins, J. (2001) Level 5 Leadership: The triumph of humility and fierce resolve, Harvard
Business Review, Vol.79 No.1, pp.66-76.
Goleman, D. (2000) Leadership that gets results, Harvard Business Review, Vol.78 No.2,
pp.78-93.
9
Ireland, R. D. & Hitt, M. A. (2005) Achieving and maintaining strategic competitiveness
in the 21st century: The role of strategic leadership, Academy of Management Executive,
Vol.19, 4, 63-77. (reprinted - original 1999, AME, Vol.13 No.1, pp.43-57.
Kotter, J. P. (1988) The Leadership Factor, The Free Press.
Kotter, J. P. (2007) Leading Change: Why transformation efforts fail, Harvard Business
Review, January, 85, 1: 96-103. (reprinted – original 1995, HBR, Vol.73 No.2, pp.59-67).
Kotter, J. P. & Schlesinger, J. A. (2008) Choosing strategies for change, Harvard Business
Review, 86, 7/8: 130-139. (reprinted – original 1979, Vol.57 No.2, pp.106-114).
Lewis, M., Andriopoulos, C. & Smith, W. (2014) Paradoxical leadership to enable strategic
agility, California Management Review, Vol.56, 3, pp.58-77.
Mayo, A. & Nohria, N. (2005) Zeitgeist leadership, Harvard Business Review, Vol.83
No.10, pp.4560.
Miles, S. A., & Watkins, M. D. (2007) The leadership team. Harvard Business Review,
Vol.85 No.4, pp.90-98.
References
(DSR) - Ch. 6
(LMQG) - Ch. 6 (6.2 Tushman, Newman & Romanelli – ‘Convergence and Upheaval:
Managing the Unsteady Pace of Organisational Evolution’; 6.3 Quinn & Voyer – ‘Logical
Incrementalism: Managing Strategy Formation’)
Agarwal, R. & Helfat, C. (2009) Strategic renewal of organizations, Organization Science,
Vol.20 No.2, pp.281-293.
Balogun, J., Hope-Hailey, V., & Gustafsson, S. (2016) Exploring Strategic Change, 4th
Edition, Pearson Education.
Balogun, J. (2006) Managing Change: Steering a course between intended strategies and
unanticipated outcomes, Long Range Planning, Vol.39 No.1, pp.29-49.
Beer, M. & Nohria, N. (2000) Cracking the Code of Change, Harvard Business Review,
Vol.78 No.3, pp.133-141.
Dunphy, D. & Stace, D. (1993) The strategic management of corporate change, Human
Relations, Vol.46 No.8, pp.905-920.
Hope Hailey, V. & Balogun, J. (2002) Devising Context Sensitive Approaches to Change:
The example of Glaxo Wellcome, Long Range Planning, Vol.35, pp.153-178.
Kotter, J. P. (2007) Leading Change: Why transformation efforts fail, Harvard Business
Review, 85, 1: 96-103. (reprinted – original 1995, HBR, Vol.73 No.2, pp.59-67.
Kotter, J. P. (1996) Leading Change, Harvard Business School Press.
Pettigrew, A. M. (1987). Context and action in the transformation of the firm. Journal of
Management Studies, Vol.24, No.6, pp.649–670.
Pettigrew, A. & Whipp, R. (1991) Managing Change for Competitive Success, Blackwell.
10
Topic: Stakeholder Management
Stakeholder management
Stakeholders, strategic management, and competitive advantage
Strategy narratives
Strategy, purpose & responsibility
Sustainable strategy, sustainable leadership and stakeholders
References
(DSR) - Ch.7
(LMQG) - Ch. 12 (12.1 Gustafsson ‘New Values, Morality and Strategic Ethics’; 12.3
Ghoshal, Bartlett & Moran ‘A New Manifesto for Management’)
Barnett, M. L. & Salomon, ft. M. (2012) Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the
shape of the relationship between social and financial performance, Strategic
Management Journal, Vol.33 No.11, pp.1304-1320.
Freeman, ft. E. (1984) Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach, Pitman.
Freeman, ft. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., De Colle, S. (2010)
Stakeholder Theory: The state of the art, Cambridge University Press.
McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D. S. (2011) Creating and capturing value: Strategic corporate
social responsibility, resource-based theory and sustainable competitive advantage,
Journal of Management, Vol.37, No.5, pp.1480-1495.
Polman, P. (2012) Captain Planet, Harvard Business Review, Vol.90 No.6, pp.112-118.
Porter, M. E. & Kramer, M. ft. (2006) Strategy & Society: The Link between competitive
advantage and corporate social responsibility, Harvard Business Review, Vol.84 No.12,
pp.78-92.
Porter, M. E. & Kramer, M. ft. (2011) Creating shared value, Harvard Business Review,
Vol.89 No.1/2, pp.62-77.
Starkey, K. & Crane, A. (2003) Towards green narrative: Management and the
evolutionary epic, Academy of Management Review, Vol.28, pp.220-237.
Stead, W. & Stead, J. (2004) Sustainable Strategic Management, M. E. Sharpe.
Good exam answers will introduce evidence, examples and arguments that require reading
beyond the lecture notes about the topics concerned. Therefore, those aiming for 1 st or 2i
marks are strongly advised to consult the reading list detailed for each lecture.
You are also encouraged to explore other texts and articles. For example, the following
journals provide useful sources: Harvard Business Review, Strategic Management Journal,
Academy of Management Perspectives, California Management Review and Sloan
Management Review.
The Financial Times, The Economist, Fortune, Management Today and the business sections
of quality newspapers are also good sources of information.
11
MyNottingham Terminology
The University of Nottingham is introducing a new student records system across its campuses in the UK, Malaysia
and China. Students will access the new system through a web portal called MyNottingham.
MyNottingham will introduce some new terminology that you will need to understand and become familiar with.
The guide below has been developed to help prepare you for this change. You will receive more information about
MyNottingham and what this means for you before we launch the system to UK students.
12