0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
13 просмотров2 страницы
Scientific explanations require identifying causal links between variables, which is difficult as correlational data does not imply causation. Decisions involving science and technology must consider technical feasibility, costs, impacts, and ethics. While science has improved lives, unintended consequences have occurred, so a distinction between possible and advisable applications must be made by considering technical, economic, environmental, and ethical factors. Conflicting views from social or ideological commitments must also be acknowledged.
Scientific explanations require identifying causal links between variables, which is difficult as correlational data does not imply causation. Decisions involving science and technology must consider technical feasibility, costs, impacts, and ethics. While science has improved lives, unintended consequences have occurred, so a distinction between possible and advisable applications must be made by considering technical, economic, environmental, and ethical factors. Conflicting views from social or ideological commitments must also be acknowledged.
Scientific explanations require identifying causal links between variables, which is difficult as correlational data does not imply causation. Decisions involving science and technology must consider technical feasibility, costs, impacts, and ethics. While science has improved lives, unintended consequences have occurred, so a distinction between possible and advisable applications must be made by considering technical, economic, environmental, and ethical factors. Conflicting views from social or ideological commitments must also be acknowledged.
Data and Explanations Social Influences on Science Causal Links Risk and Risk Decisions about Science
and Technology Assessment and Technology
The idea that any measurement always Recognise that the focus of To recognise that many To have a knowledge of To recognise that whilst the has an element of uncertainty much research is influenced by questions of interest do not different ways of expressing application of science and associated with it and that confidence the concerns and interests of have simple or evident causal risk and an awareness of the technology has made is increased with repetition and society and the availability of explanations. Rather, that uncertainties associated with substantial contributions to replication. funding. much valuable scientific work is risk measurement. the quality of life of many based on looking for people, there has been a set The idea that any experiment requires That scientists’ views and ideas correlations and that such a To be aware that there is a of unintended outcomes as the identification and control of may be influenced by their own relationship does not imply a variety of factors which well. variables. interests and commitments. causal link. impinge on people’s assessment of risk. That technology draws on That explanations require the use of That the personal status of To recognise that confidence in science in seeking solutions to creative thought and invention to scientists and their standing in correlational links is dependent That risk assessment is human problems. However, a identify what are underlying causal the field is a factor which, on the size of the sample and central to many of the distinction should be drawn relationships between variables. Such wisely or not, is often used in its selection. Events with very decisions raised by science in between what can be done explanations are often based on the judgement of their views low frequency are particularly contemporary society. and what should be done. models that cannot be observed. and ideas. difficult to explain causally. Decisions about technical applications are subject, That the goal of science is the To recognise that eliminating therefore, to a host of elimination of alternative explanations causal factors for a considerations such as to achieve a single, consensually correlational link is highly technical feasibility, economic agreed account. However, data shows problematic. Rather that much cost, environmental impact only that a single explanation is false scientific work relies on the and ethical considerations. not that it is correct. Nevertheless, our identification of plausible confidence in any explanation mechanism between factors That certain groups or increases if it offers predictions which which are correlated. individuals may hold views are shown to be true. based on deeply held religious or political commitments and All new explanations must undergo a that the tensions between process of critical scrutiny and peer conflicting views must be review before gaining wider recognised and addressed in acceptance. considering any issue. IDEAS ABOUT SCIENCE LINK: https://webspace.oise.utoronto.ca/~benczela/NoSTEd.html
Tutorial Letter 103/0/2020 Teaching Practice For Intermediate Phase (Grades 4-6) Assignment 50 Year Module Department of Curriculum and Instructional Studies