School of Chemical, Biological, and Materials Engineering and Sciences
MAPUA UNIVERSITY
RUBRIC FOR GRADING LABORATORY REPORT
Criteria Good to Very Good
(80 < Rating < 100)
Theoretical Background The theoretical background and
concept were explained
(15%) sufficiently.
Experimental The experimental methodology
was detailed and can be easily
Methodology (30%) understood.
Results and Discussion The results were discussed very
detailed and were related to the
(40%) theoretical background. The
possible sources of errors were
identified and suggested
solutions to avoid it.
Conclusions (10%) The conclusion of the report was
well defined and provided
recommendations to improve the
experiment.
Mechanics (5%) There are no grammatical and
spelling errors. The references are
properly cited. The page limit (6-
10 pages) was achieved.
This rubric is a modified version of iRubric: Journal Article Critique Rubric (https://www.rcampus.com/rubricshowc.cfm?sp=yes&code=A22B44)
Prepared by Joseph Albert M. Mendoza and Peter Matthew T. Fowler for CH117L (2Q2021)
Fair
(60 < Rating < 80)
The theoretical background and
concept were explained good but
lacks some details.
The experimental methodology
was explained but some parts
are ambiguous.
The results were discussed well
but lacks some details related to
the concepts and theoretical
background. Only identified the
possible sources of errors.
The conclusion of the report was
defined and discussed but lacks
proper recommendations to
improve the experiment.
There are some grammatical and
spelling errors. Only some of the
references were properly cited.
The page limit was met.
Poor
(10 < Rating < 60)
The theoretical background
and concept were not
explained well.
The experimental methodology
was not organized and poorly
developed.
The results were not discussed
properly and lacks organization in
the discussion. The expected
discussions were not met.
The report failed to provide
proper conclusions and
recommendations.
The report contains many
grammatical and spelling errors.
No references were included. The
number of pages did not meet
the minimum number.