MARKUS AND KITAYAMA • Pointed out that the primary method in which cultural values influence psychological process is in terms of how individuals define their selves and how they see themselves in relations to others in their social network. INDIVIDUALIST VS. COLLECTIVIST INDIVIDUALIST - Subscribe to individualistic values see themselves as separate entities from others - They believe that they are independent from others and therefore can think, decide, and exist on their own - Have stable personality traits that characterize their uniqueness INDIVIDUALIST VS. COLLECTIVIST INDIVIDUALIST Place a premium on individual effort, performance and needs over that of cultural norms and standards - In an individualist culture; expected to prioritize the expressions of self and identify to stand out, to be best in whatever they do and to be successful Most westerns work and strive for their goals and dreams for themselves, they may want to contribute to society or their communities and families but their primary motivation is for their own gratification INDIVIDUALIST VS. COLLECTIVIST INDIVIDUALIST - In terms of emotions and mental health - Said to be happier, because westerners tend to work towards their personal hapiness - Have better self-enhancement beliefs - Less personal responsibility for failures - Experience emotions directly related to their sense of self INDIVIDUALIST VS. COLLECTIVIST INDIVIDUALIST - In terms of emotions and mental health Are less affected by failure and feelings of shame and guilt because they attribute these externally and hence protect their sense of self - When they experience success, they attribute this to their own strength and perseverance - They may experience greater feelings of frustrations and isolations which may cause depression and a poor sense of selfworth INDIVIDUALIST VS. COLLECTIVIST COLLECTIVIST - Do not exist independently of their society, family and culture - Believe that each one is highly interdependent in one's family, tribe, community and culture - Each one contributes to the success and well-being of the family - Primary motivation for achieving one's goal is always for the honor of the family INDIVIDUALIST VS. COLLECTIVIST COLLECTIVIST - Filipinos are largely collectivist, in the study of “Pagkataong Pilipino” it was reported that collectivist values such as strong family ties, national identity and sense of national pride are all high Filipinos appear to share individualist values such as being independent, self-reliant and self-sufficient are also high. Thus to some degree Filipinos share individualist traits with other westerners INDIVIDUALIST VS. COLLECTIVIST COLLECTIVIST - Filipinos do refer to themselves in relation to other people "kapwa" – does not refer to others, but rather as like one - Kapwa-tao - or sa aking kapwa, they are also reffering to their sense of self - Filipinos are also placing value on hard-work, being internally motivated, uniqueness and excellence, but these are always in relation to their family and religion/spirituality INDIVIDUALIST VS. COLLECTIVIST COLLECTIVIST - In terms of emotions and mental health Tend to be less happy when it comes to personal endeavors as they often have to consider the needs and plans of their elders and family members Tend to experience greater feelings of shame and guilt as they are afraid to bring dishonor to their families INDIVIDUALIST VS. COLLECTIVIST COLLECTIVIST - In terms of success, attribute this to situational factors and downplay their own efforts but tend to take responsibility for failures as challenge to do better - Base their emotional expressions on the outcome of their actions They feel positive emotions when they are able to contribute to the betterment of other people - The self in a collectivist culture is buffered by social networks and family that lessens the possibility of depression and other mental health issues SELF AS SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION Who we are and who we become is heavily influenced by our environment and the relationships we have in it - SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION - As much as self is a mental representation of the totality of who we are Would refer to how our reality is shared and influenced by our interactions with others The conceptualization of the self is dependent on experiences that the individual had with other people SELF AS SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION - Can be examined along the lenses of shared knowledge and language Knowledge - Endowed to the knower of self What is known is brought about by a shared knowledge of what is truth, objectives, rational and moral - What we consider to be the truth depends on the rules and practices in a society SELF AS SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION - Can be examined along the lenses of shared knowledge and language LANGUAGE Refers to the signs and symbols that any given society use to transmit information and knowledge - Primary means of communicating with others - Emojis & acronyms: means of self-expression and communication SELF AS SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION Self does not emerge as a separate entity and then relates to others, rather, it is through the relations and transactions with others that the self is formed - Quest in understanding the self; look into your own interactions with your family, parents and siblings, as they clearly have an impact on your beliefs about yourself SELF IN CONFUCIAN THOUGHT Confucius - Became a spiritual symbol and has become venerated as some sort of teacher, leader and mentor Oriental Philosophy - Concerned with how experience is able to transform the individual, not with formal tenets and logic Eastern ideas - The self emphasize the greater good, intuition, experiences and personal relationships SELF IN CONFUCIAN THOUGHT Confucianism - Both a philosophical way of life and a spiritual-religious system of belief - This system of thought began 200 BC during the Han dynasty - Systematically laid out the tenet of Chinese philosophy which emphasized correct behavior, obedience and loyalty SELF IN CONFUCIAN THOUGHT Confucianism - Defines the self in terms of the five most important cardinal relationships that an individual has - Between ruler and minister - Between father and son - Between husband and wife - Between brothers - Between friends These relationships must be nurtured by adopting and demonstrating proper behavior which is composed of reciprocity, interdependence and interrelatedness SELF IN CONFUCIAN THOUGHT Confucianism The focus of Confucianism is relational identity which is the identity of the self as it is defined by the individual's significant relationships with others. The roles that we take on define and dictates the proper behavior that we should exhibit, not from our personalities SELF IN CONFUCIAN THOUGHT Confucianism Self is embedded in the collective identity of the group or family to which the individual belongs - The individual shares in the pride and shame of the group and thus the individual must act in the best possible way to be obedient and loyal to the group, so as not to commit acts that would bring shame to the group SELF IN CONFUCIAN THOUGHT Confucianism - Self should have an unwavering commitment to goodness and to observe propriety and sincerity in one's behavior - To sacrifice oneself and to act in propriety is the highest virtue - To sacrifice oneself is the ability to act in accordance with social requirements and obligations and to disregard individual desires and needs SELF IN CONFUCIAN THOUGHT Confucianism - OFW's – they have taken on the role of providers - Provider has to be a good provider, one that will put everyone else's needs and desires ahead of their own - Parents: primary goal is to provide a good and stable future - Filial piety: refers to the obligation of the child to take care of his parents - It is important to examine the self in terms of various perspectives that will help in gaining a better understanding of our own selfhood and identity
Student as a student Marrying someone parents disapprove, maburos at a young age